2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 7)

Sample 1:

In today’s world, there is a noticeable shift in how both men and women view the importance of their personal appearance. The contemporary landscape, marked by the widespread use of social media and the growing beauty industry, has led to an increased emphasis on physical looks. When considering the statement that individuals today are more concerned about their appearance compared to the past, I tend to agree. This essay will explore the various factors contributing to this trend, offering a nuanced examination of changing attitudes towards appearance in modern society.

One factor contributing to this trend is the pervasive influence of social media. Platforms such as Instagram and Facebook expose individuals to carefully curated images of beauty and perfection. This online environment promotes a culture where appearance is not only a personal matter but also a form of social currency that affects self-esteem and societal acceptance.

Furthermore, the rise of the beauty and fashion industries has significantly altered perceptions of self-worth. Advertisements and celebrity endorsements create an aspirational image that many people feel compelled to imitate. The wide availability of beauty products and services further fuels the desire to achieve an idealized appearance.

However, it’s important to acknowledge that historical and cultural factors have also played a role in shaping ideals of beauty. In the past, societal norms may have dictated different standards, and individuals may have focused on conforming to those ideals.

Nevertheless, despite these historical variations, the contemporary obsession with appearance appears to be a defining characteristic of our times. The constant exposure to idealized images, along with the booming beauty industry, has magnified the importance people attach to physical attractiveness.

In conclusion, while historical and cultural contexts may have influenced perceptions of beauty, the pervasive impact of social media and the beauty industry has unquestionably heightened the significance people place on their appearance today. I agree with the notion that both men and women are more preoccupied with their looks in the present era.

Sample 2:

Generally, people are more fashion-conscious these days. The economy has become stronger and wider, in comparison with past time, which provides more freedom to people to do what they want. Nowadays they have many more possibilities to be in trend and build their own fashion style. On the face of it, a negative wind is also there. However, I would appreciate the former opinion.

One reason for this is that these day, men and women feel they have to look good too. In fact, the majority of them believe that image and clothes are really important to give some information about habits, lifestyle or personality. Overall, a good look could influent on career or personal life, because the first view about individuals is made by estimating appearance. For examples, if person well-dressed it makes them attractive and expresses a good impression on others.

Yet another reason for this trend is the coming up of new brands. Nowadays the brands play a relevant role in the society. In fact, the brands are really important as well as the good look because it give also information about social background. Especially among young people, the brand represents a fundamental requirement to be part of a group. Furthermore, fashion changes quickly, and this is one of the reasons why people buy clothes every season, even if they don’t really have any need.

In conclusion, shopping and estimating appearance help people in the work relationship or for the young people, help them to be a part of a group.

Sample 3:

In modern days, more and more people regarding their age, gender, and social level have started to reconsider their appearance, therefore spending way more time, energy, and resources on enhancing their looks compared to past times. I would certainly agree with this statement and will also discuss why I can’t agree with some aspects of this topic.

First of all, I would like to separate men and women due to different social expectations and norms. Throughout history, women were more likely to experience a certain pressure on their looks and behavior. That is the reason why women today spend even more time and money on their looks. In our modern age, we have a new term, "neopatriarchy”, which basically sells the idea that women should do plastic surgeries, be slimmer, put makeup on, and so on just for themselves. This is completely misleading and sets the wrong ideas for young girls. Before, it was straightforward that women should look better for their man, husband, and family, while nowadays women believe that looking better is something that they are doing because of themselves. It is getting harder to not think about it because of social media, where people post only the best of themselves without showing the actual and truthful side of their appearance. That’s why I believe that these social media content creators can do more harm to ordinary people, and it’s something that women have to understand how to stay rational and truthful to themselves.

On the other hand, men have never faced the same criticism as women before recent times. Even fifty years ago, almost none would say anything about men having wrinkles or being slightly obese. Unlike nowadays, men also have begun to think more about their looks, they have started to work out more to be in shape, and they also have begun doing plastic surgeries and going to the barbers. I wouldn’t necessarily say that now it is better than it was before because it also has some downsides. For example, toxic masculine men are usually the ones who will try to offend men who try to change their looks, do nails, change their hairstyle, or wear “women” type clothes. In this case, the problem lies deep in our social norms and standards, which are slowly moving towards gender naturality and accepting yourself, and hopefully, in the future, no one will be ashamed to be themselves.

To sum it up, there is definitely a trend for men and women, where they are trying to look better and care more about their appearance than in previous times.

Sample 4:

Today, males and females are more concerned about their looks than in the past, the essay will agree because the statement showed me something about my reality and something I see every day.

This is unfortunately sad, our society changing, and sometimes people change to be better sometimes not, one of the bad things that changing badly is concern about looks, and it’s horrible because it is not something we can choose, I know many people who did not accept their look and try to change it every day and this makes them lose confidence in themselves, In Oxford University research, it was found that most people who suffer from communication problems are the same who are concerned about their appearance.

But that happened? With time we began to appreciate beauty, however, we did not know the limit, and we misunderstood the meaning of beauty, we started asking about beauty in everything, that really bad, and now we do not know anything about the stranger, However, we judge him by his appearance. Even if he is a good person, we will hate him because of his looks.

So, women and men need to change this and be more accepting of their looks because it will be helpful to them in many ways, one of these ways is to pay attention to their personalities more and develop our thoughts to be better, I know that person how has really normal look but the special about him is his personality, this what we suppose to care about.

Sample 5:

In the present age, education is playing an increasingly critical role in every country. In the meantime, a number of people believe that it is necessary for students to finish their exercises even in their spare time. Personally, I think their view is overly simplistic and I believe there are other activities except for study which will have a beneficial impact on students.

First, joining various kinds of extra-curricular activities, such as camping and hiking will relax their bodies and minds since most students are under too much peer pressure currently. Moreover, if children have a chance to travel with their family to various places and interact with the local residents, it will definitely broaden their horizons and enrich their experience. Except that, the students who live in a needy family might need to find a part-time job in order to support themselves, if they only spend hours on finishing tasks given by the school, they might not be able to earn abundance money for their next semester.

Admittedly, students should give priority to study, and it is apparent that finishing their homework will assist them with reviewing the courses and having a better understanding. More specifically, the main purpose of giving practices is to help students digest and have a good command of knowledge. Moreover, it is common for students to waste their life playing computer games and a number of them might even be addicted to the mobile phone which will have a baneful impact on them physically and mentally. Nevertheless, I believe that students’ spare time should not be occupied fully with homework, there is abundance of knowledge in this world which they cannot learn from textbooks.

Overall, I am convinced that it is worthwhile for students to arrange their leisure time independently while it should also schedule the space to study.

Sample 1:

In the realm of sports, a perennial debate exists over whether success is primarily a result of innate talent or continuous hard work. While it is undeniable that natural talent provides a solid foundation for athletic prowess, I firmly believe that relentless dedication and consistent effort are the ultimate determinants of success in sports.

Firstly, natural talent undoubtedly plays a significant role in providing athletes with a competitive edge. Those born with exceptional physical abilities, such as speed, agility, and coordination, often find it easier to excel in sports from a young age. This innate advantage can set them apart from their peers and provide a head start in their athletic careers. For example, many legendary athletes, such as Usain Bolt and Serena Williams, have been lauded for their extraordinary natural abilities that were apparent even in their early years.

However, relying solely on inborn talent can be a double-edged sword. Talent without hard work is often wasted. The history of sports is replete with examples of prodigiously talented individuals who failed to reach their potential due to a lack of discipline, perseverance, and dedication. On the other hand, numerous athletes with modest natural abilities have achieved greatness through sheer hard work and relentless determination. A prime example is Michael Jordan, who, despite not being the most naturally gifted player, became a basketball legend through his unwavering commitment to improvement and an unparalleled work ethic.

Moreover, continuous hard work fosters resilience and mental toughness, essential attributes for success in sports. The journey to athletic excellence is fraught with challenges, setbacks, and failures. Athletes who cultivate a habit of relentless practice and self-improvement are better equipped to overcome these obstacles. They develop a growth mindset, viewing failures as opportunities to learn and grow, rather than insurmountable barriers. This resilience is often the distinguishing factor between those who achieve lasting success and those who fall by the wayside.

In addition, the modern sports landscape demands more than just physical prowess. Strategic thinking, tactical awareness, and the ability to adapt to different situations are crucial for success. These skills are honed through continuous learning, practice, and experience. Athletes who dedicate themselves to studying their sport, analyzing their performance, and constantly seeking ways to improve are the ones who ultimately achieve sustained success.

In conclusion, while natural talent provides a valuable head start in sports, it is the continuous effort, hard work, and dedication that ultimately determine success. The combination of innate ability and relentless perseverance creates a powerful synergy that propels athletes to the pinnacle of their sports. Therefore, I firmly believe that continuous working on oneself is the key to achieving lasting success in sports.

Sample 2:

Without any doubt society is divided into two groups due to the distinct mindsets of people, therefore it has become a debatable issue whether a win comes from inborn talent or hard work done by an individual later in life brings success. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions, but my point of view will be also elaborated in the conclusion.

To commence with the first notion, the qualities that individuals have from their birth play a vital role in becoming an excellent sportsperson because the genetics of a person are responsible for the growth of a body and most players receive sportsmanship in heritage from their parents. To illustrate, a survey was conducted in India, and it was observed that well-known sports people had parents or grandparents who were interested in games and had participated at various high levels tournaments. Hence, talent from birth cannot be neglected.

Moving towards the other idea, self-improvement can change a learner's life because it is said that perfection comes from practice and the same notion applies to athletics. In addition, the body can be changed by practice as qualities like stamina, which is considerable strength comes from long-term running practices and other physical activities. Thus, players spend a huge amount of time in playgrounds. For instance, Neeraj Choopra who was an Indian-origin player participated multiple times in the commonwealth games and won the gold medal in javelin throw in 2022, he told in his interview how the practice made him capable of winning a gold medal. Therefore, hard work makes a big difference in the performance of sportsmen.

In conclusion, in my opinion, working hard is the only way to achieve something in life but inborn skills are also a kind of privilege for some people but, it cannot not be said that a person became fine in any field only because of skills that he had from birth.

Sample 3:

The success factor of a sportsman has always been a controversial one. Few people believe that the innate talent is the reason for achievement while others concur that continual working is a key factor. This essay will examine both the views and the reason why I agree that hard work is a much needed one to excel in sport.

To begin with, those people who advocate that inborn talent is enough for a person to become a successful sportsman have their own justifiable reasons. Firstly, a few sports really do not need great effort or practice to win a game. Running, for example, apparently, those people from African continent are sprinters by nature, and they easily compete and win other people. In addition to that, they believe that only having the physical strength will make an athlete achieve higher in their games. For instance, to become a successful basketball player, they think height is the only needed qualification.

Having said that, others and I believe that hard work and continuous practice are the success formula to reach the goal of victory in any games. A player can never be a successful one without dedication and perpetual work. Furthermore, even though if someone is not with the inborn talent, he or she can improve their skills and succeed by doing the regular practice. To illustrate, Sachin Tendulkar, the greatest Cricket player of this era, reached a milestone where no one can reach him. This success never came to him in an easy way. He practiced a lot with dedication for at least 5 to 6 hours a day, which made him as a unique batsman than others. Evidently, hard work and dedication are the key formula to win.

In summary, I would like to reiterate my views, although few sportsmen are achieved with only their innate ability, only those who continually practicing improving their skills can taste the victory for ever.

Sample 1:

Both politicians and individuals are responsible for protecting the environment and curbing damages. While some argue that politicians and mankind make no difference in constructing a friendly-environment, I totally disagree with this stance and assert that both governments and individuals contribute largely to preserving the environment.

Incorrectly seeing short-term profits and results, proponents of politicians and persons having tiny contributions are short-sighted. Doubtless, repairing an ecosystem that has been destroyed is a perennial process, so humans need to have enough patience to implement actions step by step. This way, effective results will sooner appear.

Huge impacts are made by officeholders. Firstly, large infrastructural changes needed for significant environmental impact can mostly be overseen and funded by governments. For example, research on finding alternative sources of fresh water is urgent since the grave water scarcity. Both glacial water and desalinated slat water hold huge potential as vast sources of water, however, these techniques are too expensive to allocate, so only official institutions and wealthy men can afford them. Moreover, governments can release reasonable policies and regulations, constraining actions that instill large contamination to the environment and offering incentives to ecosystem-friendly shops like reducing taxation.

Individuals also contribute to constructing the environment. Firstly, uninformed or misinformed about the baneful influence that individuals’ daily activities injury the ecosystem is the culprit of environmental problems. Individual actions such as reusing or rejecting plastic packing items, shutting down taps quickly and conserving fossil fuels accumulate together and make a significant difference. Furthermore, education and personal responsibility towards the environment can foster a culture of sustainability among the populace. For instance, in China, there are ubiquitous banners saying, green mountains and clear water are gold mountains and pupils in schools are required to recite methods about protecting the environment.

In conclusion, not only officeholders but individuals are responsible for being conservationists. Although the result only can be seen in the long-term, they both produce huge contributions from past to present.

Sample 2:

Environmental problems have risen alarmingly worldwide. Many believe that people individually have less power to solve this phenomenon. I disagree with those who argue that this responsibility belongs only to politicians because a comprehensive collaboration is urgently needed.

Global environmental damage is a huge problem. It is indeed that politicians have a major voice in influencing people and government. They could address a new regulation to prevent and reduce this damage. Nevertheless, the number of politicians is too small and probably accounts for one-third of the population. Without real movement and changes, the regulation would only be a piece of written argument. For example, the Safe the Earth campaign declared by the politicians on television would be useless if there is little to no support from individuals. Therefore, a collaborative action is necessary and needs to be considered.

On the other hand, a small impact by each individual on earth can bring profound change. The accumulation of real continuous movement will result in a greater positive impact. In order to solve a global problem, recent studies show that the involvement of all stakeholders are critical. All layers ranging from individuals to politicians, international bodies, and government are responsible for taking action together. An effort to reduce household products, recycling plastic bottles, reusing bags, and wise use of electricity are examples of individual responsibility for tackling environmental problems. Moreover, the community awareness of environmental-friendly action in developed countries like Europe is also great evidence of how individuals could successfully be part of the Safe Earth movement.

In conclusion, preventing and reducing environmental damage is the responsibility of all human beings. Even though politician has strong power, this problem is considerably unable to be solved only by them. Therefore, an inclusive movement involving individuals should be addressed.

Sample 3:

Some people think that politicians should be responsible for protecting the environment as there is nothing much that individuals can do about this problem. In my opinion, the responsibility to protect the environment should not fall upon politicians alone because ordinary citizens can make a significant contribution.

Firstly, politicians can urge the government to impose new laws against actions that damage the environment. For instance, one of the major factors leading to environmental pollution is the overuse of plastic products, like bottles and bags, and this can be stopped if the government issues an official ban on all companies from using plastic packaging. In addition, the rate of deforestation can also be reduced if high-ranking bureaucrats agree to impose strict punishments, such as long-term imprisonment and heavy fines, on those who cut down trees illegally. However, besides introducing and enforcing new laws and regulations, I doubt that there is any further action that politicians can take to protect the environment.

On the other hand, I believe that ordinary people, through small, everyday actions, can also greatly contribute to protecting the environment. First, citizens in many countries, like the Netherlands, have now shifted towards using bicycles and subway trains for their daily travel instead of cars, which has so far helped reduce a tremendous amount of CO2 released into the air, and improved air quality. Second, the problem of polluted oceans has also been tackled in many places thanks to groups of young people who voluntarily spend their time cleaning up beaches, or even diving into water to pick up trash. For example, many students in Nha Trang, a coastal city of Vietnam, spent nearly their whole summer holiday in 2018 keeping the beaches of their hometown clean by collecting all the trash from tourists, and even banned Chinese people from entering certain areas to prevent them from littering.

In conclusion, I hold the view that politicians alone cannot deal with all environmental problems, and therefore individuals should also make a contribution to protecting our environment.

Sample 4:

Many people think that governments should hold accountable for environmental protection as individuals just play an insignificant role. I disagree with this idea for some reasons.

Of course, if governments get involved with fighting global environmental damage, they can make a world of difference. There should be strict legislation which can impose coercive effect on individuals. For example, Singapore is well-known for the healthiest and cleanest environment. This is because the government imposes a severe penalty to fine heavily anyone who does things harmful to the local environment.

On the other hand, some people believe that our small individual actions often seem insignificant compared to official measures, and we can do nothing to look after the environment. However, individual actions can prove more effective than they think. If each avoids driving their own car for short journeys, takes public transportation, and walks or cycles instead, the use of fossil fuels and the level of contaminated air will be reduced to some extent. Another example is that many people stop using plastic bags as it is a hazardous pollutant of the soil, and they take eco-friendly substitutes such as paper or cloth bags into consideration. These examples show that individuals making compromises to green their lifestyles can play an important role towards environmental protection.

In conclusion, when it comes to environmental problems, governments should take responsibility, but I think that individual actions are indispensable in the problem-solving process. The idea of making people responsible for environmental protection should be promoted in every country.

Sample 5:

It is believed that only governments have the power to solve environmental problems that are posing serious threats to today’s world. However, I think that protecting the earth is the responsibility of both governments and individuals.

It is true that some environmental issues are too big for individuals to deal with. In order for serious problems, such as global warming, prolonged droughts, violent storms or other extreme weather events, to be effectively addressed, it requires the efforts and cooperation of politicians and large environmental organizations. This is because solving such problems requires special equipment, the use of modern technological devices and large numbers of experienced scientists to work together. For instance, it takes years for researchers to collect various samples and analyse huge amounts of data in order to know the major causes of global warming, and to help them find the most effective solutions to tackle this problem. Only governments can have sufficient funds and resources to invest in this.

However, I believe that individuals also need to take responsibility for environmental protection. As individuals, we can help in various ways, such as recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items or planting more trees in our gardens. I think that without the cooperation of both politicians and individuals, environmental issues will never be effectively tackled. For example, if farmers continue to burn forests for their own purposes, regardless of the government’s regulations, the problem of climate change will never be successfully mitigated.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.

Sample 6:

Damage to the global environment is increasing at an alarming rate. Some people argue that government officials should be mainly held accountable for environmental protection, since little can be done by ordinary people. However, I believe although politicians do have a crucial role to play in addressing this problem, individual contributions are by no means negligible.

The fundamental part of governments in mitigating environmental damage is effective policy implementation on both domestic and international levels. By enacting laws and measures regarding global environmental issues, such as emission control, waste treatment practices, and sanctuaries for endangered species, policy makers are able to take concrete actions to realize sustainable development, because these policies act as guidelines for individuals and private sectors in their daily activities. Besides, it is politicians who can make sure sufficient funding is allocated in that regard, in order to support and sustain environmental actions which have strong reliance on continuous investment. In essence, politicians can make a difference on a much bigger picture than individuals.

However, government policies and spending ultimately rely on public support, without which all efforts would be in vain. A convincing evidence is that similar environmental policies often have various outcomes in different countries, largely due to the level of public participation. When people have greater environmental awareness, they would be more willing to comply with relevant laws and regulations. Another responsibility of Individuals lies with everyday actions to protect the environment. For instance, recycling and reuse help to cut down waste; transport conservation assists in reducing greenhouse gas emissions; economizing energy use in daily life contributes to reducing excessive exploitation of natural resources.

In conclusion, I assert politicians have indisputable responsibility for reducing damage to the environment, but this does not mean that individual efforts are insignificant, since the general public can join hands with the government. Lack of individual participation could mean that addressing environmental issues is beyond reach.

Sample 7:

Climate change has triggered a wide range of natural disasters across the globe, ultimately accelerating environmental degradation. It is argued by some that the onus of preventing this lies more with politicians than with individuals. From my perspective, I contend that individuals should assume a greater level of responsibility in addressing this issue.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that governments have failed to sufficiently address climate change. Politicians not only possess financial resources but also wield significant authority. They have the capacity to revise policies aimed at mitigating actions that contribute to climate change. Furthermore, governments can play a crucial role in raising awareness about the perils of global environmental damage and promoting environmentally friendly lifestyles within society. This can help to foster a greater understanding of the dangers posed by climate change, thereby encouraging more individuals to take proactive measures to safeguard the environment.

Despite the negligence of politicians, individuals have also failed to take effective actions to combat climate change. It is apparent that a substantial number of people still engage in wasteful practices such as excessive water and electricity consumption. While there are existing policies in place to regulate the emission of air pollutants, many factories continue to engage in illicit activities that exacerbate the effects of climate change. For instance, numerous factories indiscriminately discharge significant amounts of industrial wastewater, further deteriorating the environmental situation. Additionally, a considerable portion of the population views global environmental damage as a trivial issue and fails to take any preventive measures. The primary reason for this apathy is the lack of awareness about the severity of climate change.

In conclusion, while it is undeniable that governments have not adequately fulfilled their obligations to address environmental shifts, the primary responsibility rests on individuals due to their lack of attentiveness to this pressing issue.

Sample 1:

Accomplishment, to some people, is based on money and material things. In addition, a number of individuals believe that success and personal achievements are linked to having considerable wealth. I believe that each person has their own definition of accomplishment, and on this basis, affluence cannot be taken as a reference of measurement for personal achievements or goals.

Firstly, when we were children, we were told that getting good grades in school was imperative. Moreover, we learned from a young age that a successful career is related to a good education. Furthermore, society made us competitive and encouraged us to be better than our friends. This competitiveness was nurtured in school. To illustrate, there was a recent study that revealed most university students not only chose their career based on their future earning potential, but also prosperity is a result of success. One clear example is in Spain, whereby far students prefer to study business instead of science because they believe working in business is as sound as a dollar and they will get a run for their money and not just get by.

More specifically social media has the ability to influence the way in which happiness is measured. Social media influencers, in particular, can have content that is based on a luxury lifestyle. Admittedly, they show a fantasy reality that is unachievable for most of humankind, nevertheless, many humans are still influenced. To illustrate, Instagram is filled with profiles that portray how wonderful their existence is, although these images may be a rip-off. Clearly, all that glitters is not gold and many of these lives are as phoney as a $3 bill. Despite this an instantaneous duality of thought between frustration and ambition is still perceived by many users. As a result, many people can feel dissatisfied with their lives.

To sum up, there are two sides to every coin. I am totally convinced that personal realization is independent and different for each individual. Additionally, I believe that what makes a successful human is based on their own goals. As far as I am concerned, wealth is not the best way to advance in your evolution. In conclusion, to me to possess wealth and success your heart needs to be content, which is for me my family, my job, and my friends.

Sample 2:

In the current era, we live in a world where approximately everything is measured by your financial performance. It is believed by some parts of the population that material belongings are the best way to estimate success.

To begin with, on the one hand, wealth can be the best measure of successful people since it shows the results of hard work and development. This is because of the fact that not only did people spend a lot of their time studying and working in order to have money but also, they might sacrifice some benefits in order to increase their fortune. As a result, if we calculate how much of real cash does a person have in his bank account, we can put him in one of the social statuses existing in our society and assess his achievement. For example, in Ukraine, the majority of people are classified by the amount of money they have earnt during their work, and it is the most popular way to measure businessmen's achievements.

However, on the other hand, money is a very unstable thing and, moreover, it can be classified as something virtual since even though it can be gained quickly you can lose it in on the day and become bankrupt. The main reason for this is that not only do wise entrepreneurs learn financial literacy to know how to keep all the money earned but also since the majority prefer to spend all their cash without thinking and then, they are left with nothing. Therefore, those who are successful do not have to be rich or wealthy since they may reinvest all their money into their companies in order to increase their fortune even more significantly. For instance, recent research has shown that a major part of businessmen who achieved a lot, in reality, do not have real cash inside their wallet since they prefer to own assets and reinvest the money.

Eventually, to conclude, although wealth can somehow describe a person and his achievements it cannot be classified as the best measure of success. In my opinion, people become successful when they own a large number of assets that lead to a balanced and calm life.

Sample 3:

For many generations, money and possessions are considered as indicators of success. In my perspective, financial stability is only one aspect of being jubilant in life and an individual needs an economical, domestic, social, and spiritual balance to be recognized as an idol of accomplishment. This essay will be focusing on two major elements of success: domestic and spiritual balance apart from monetary power.

Although, the publishers have often advertised the individuals who have acquired riches as lucrative, no one has ever paid attention to hypothesis of overall success. Unfortunately, the majority of the so-called successful people might have their banks loaded with cash but none of them openly discuss their happy family life. Their failure in family life testify to the unsuccessful life. For example, it is quite common among Hollywood actors and actresses often leave their respective partners once they become famous and wallets heavy.

A fundamental ingredient that completes a man’s success story is his mental stability. If a person is showering in cash but still does not have peace of mind, then then calling triumphant is doubtful. A research conducted by University of Kelaniya has endorsed that the richest businessmen have the least sleep due their unease mind. Thus, it is clear that to call someone wealthy one must not only claim his wealth but also a spiritual wellbeing as well.

To attest one’s success, the marker for assessing should vary depending on different aspects, not solely upon the weight of their bank balance. Despite being against the idea, achieving one’s desire or aim can be considered as successful. Thus, depending on the desire, the victory will vary from being economically sound, well-educated, building a house to living a happily ever after.

Sample 4:

In contemporary society, the accumulation of wealth and material possessions is often heralded as the quintessence of success. However, equating prosperity with triumph is a myopic view; success is far more multifaceted, involving personal fulfillment, contributions to society, and the ability to overcome adversity. This essay will delve into these broader dimensions of success, arguing that it cannot be solely measured by material gains.

The essence of true success lies not merely in the superficial accumulation of wealth, but more profoundly in personal satisfaction and growth. Achieving personal goals, whether they involve advancing in education, refining personal skills, or enhancing emotional intelligence, stands as a testament to one's unwavering dedication and deep-seated passion. For example, an individual who dedicates themselves to mastering a new language or instrument experiences a sense of accomplishment that wealth simply cannot quantify. This intrinsic satisfaction fosters a profound sense of achievement, illustrating vividly that success is deeply personal and cannot be universally gauged by monetary standards or material acquisitions.

Furthermore, contributing positively to society marks a person as truly successful in a way that transcends monetary achievement. Individuals like teachers, who may not amass substantial wealth, play a pivotal role in shaping future generations, imparting knowledge and values that foster societal growth. Their impact is immeasurable in monetary terms but invaluable in societal development, embodying the true spirit of altruism. Moreover, philanthropists, who utilize their wealth for societal betterment, exemplify that the ultimate utilization of wealth in contributing to the common good redefines success. Their actions demonstrate that societal contribution and influence are significant indicators of success, far surpassing the mere possession of material wealth and highlighting a broader, more inclusive definition of achievement.

In conclusion, while wealth and possessions are visible indicators of success, they do not wholly encapsulate its essence. True success is a complex amalgamation of personal fulfillment, societal contribution, and resilience in the face of challenges. It transcends material accumulation, residing instead in the impact one has on the world and the personal milestones one achieves.

Sample 5:

In modern society, success is frequently equated with wealth and the accumulation of material assets. However, this perspective is reductive and overlooks the multifaceted nature of human achievement. True success should be measured by personal fulfillment, the impact on others, and the ability to overcome adversity, rather than solely by financial status.

The essence of success transcends mere financial wealth; it encompasses personal satisfaction and the positive influence one has on one’s community. For instance, an individual dedicating their life to teaching or nursing may not amass substantial wealth but plays a crucial role in shaping future generations and saving lives, respectively. Their contribution to society's fabric, although not quantifiable in monetary terms, is invaluable. Similarly, entrepreneurs and innovators who revolutionize industries or solve pressing societal issues contribute significantly beyond their financial gains. These examples underscore that impact and fulfillment are paramount in defining success.

Moreover, the journey towards overcoming challenges is a critical indicator of success. History is replete with stories of individuals who, despite facing significant obstacles, persevered and achieved their goals, demonstrating unwavering resilience and determination. These qualities are hallmark traits of truly successful individuals. For instance, scientists engaged in groundbreaking research may encounter years of setbacks and failures before finally reaching significant breakthroughs. Their success is not measured by the immediate financial return but by the extraordinary perseverance, tenacity, and unrelenting dedication they exhibit in the relentless pursuit of their ambitious goals, setting a sterling example for future generations.

In conclusion, while wealth and material possessions are visible indicators of success, they do not fully encapsulate the essence of true achievement. Success is better gauged by personal fulfillment, societal impact, and resilience in the face of adversity. These dimensions not only provide a more comprehensive understanding of success but also encourage a society that values contributions beyond material wealth.

Sample 6:

In contemporary society, success is oftentimes equated with financial prosperity and the possession of material assets. While wealth is undoubtedly one aspect of success, it is far from being the definitive yardstick. In my opinion, true success is multifaceted, encompassing various elements beyond monetary riches.

While wealth does play a role in measuring success, it cannot be considered the sole determinant. Success should be viewed through a broader lens that includes personal fulfillment, contentment, and achieving one's aspirations and goals. Consequently, an individual should be evaluated based on their accomplishments, contributions to society, personal growth, and overall happiness rather than purely their financial status. For instance, someone who dedicates their life to a noble cause, makes a significant impact in their community, or attains self-actualization through creative pursuits can be considered immensely successful despite not being immensely wealthy.

In my opinion, qualities such as resilience, perseverance, determination, and the ability to overcome obstacles are integral components of success. A person's success is often rooted in their capability to face adversity, learn from failures, and adapt to changes. For instance, an individual who faces numerous setbacks but continues to strive towards their goals with unwavering determination embodies the essence of success, irrespective of their financial standing.

In conclusion, while wealth can be a facet of success, it is overly simplistic and limited to consider it the ultimate measure. Genuine success encompasses a multitude of aspects such as personal fulfillment, contributions to society, resilience, and perseverance. Therefore, a person's success should be assessed holistically, taking into account their achievements, growth, and impact on others beyond material wealth.

Sample 7:

“Success is the sum of small efforts – repeated day in and day out.” A famed quote by Robert Collier. Capital and valuables are used as a measurement of victory consistently. In my opinion, a person’s success cannot be determined by possessions or credits. Money will always be life satisfying but never be soul satisfying. I will be explaining this in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Folks who have wealth may not be delighted. They will be crying hard because of the unsatisfactory life. Conventional societal standards see finances as a measure of status. A perfect blend of a supportive family, a promising career and sound health is what makes a successful person. A student who doesn’t study for an exam might fail. Money can’t make him pass the exam. Hard work is more valuable than money.

If one has capital, it doesn’t mean that the person has gained. If success were free, everyone would have it. The truth is that only a few people are determined and diligent. If people are more productive and satisfied with what they do, they derive positive self-worth, pride, and contentment. The nectar of success does not depend upon money. It depends upon the hard work and satisfaction that we get from that. The story of Thomas Edison is a classic example. He conducted thousands of failed experiments with the filament until the most famous light bulb was invented. His strive and brilliance made him successful rather than his wealth

In conclusion, for all the reasons I have mentioned above, I believe that to become a successful person, people must be hardworking and determined to work on their dream rather than money. If an individual finds success from their life experience and creates a depiction of victory out of it, then this approach will lead him to avoid wasting energy and pursue a modern and higher crest. Achievement obtained by an individual is different, but happiness and contentment are the real metrics of success.

Sample 8:

Wealth and material things are frequently used as measures of an individual's success or achievement in today's materialistic society. Wealth or material possessions, in my opinion, are an inaccurate yardstick by which to judge one's achievement. However, an individual's ability to deal with adversities, optimistic outlook and personality contribute to true success. For a long time, the great majority has measured success primarily through riches and material belongings. These two indications have a significant role in a distorted picture of achievement. This is due to the fact that everyone's notion of success is different. A successful person can determine his or her own meaning of success. Which allows him or her to avoid spending energy and time pursuing the concept of progress of another person. In an ideal world, success isn't defined solely by wealth and material possessions. Being successful at what one is doing can potentially result in money and material belongings. However, these two characteristics should never be used to determine success. Different components, however, have a role in an individual's success. To begin with, the strength to handle one's circumstances is what defines success. To give an example, a person's upbringing. And the hardships she or he has faced in life may be an excellent indicator of his success. And the individual who can overcome all obstacles, no matter how difficult, is truly successful. Furthermore, having a good attitude makes it easier to deal with the stresses of daily life. Indeed, it evokes positivity in their lives and makes it easier to overcome anxieties and negative thinking. This results in positive changes in their lives and, as a result, success. Finally, charisma is a key aspect of achieving success. This does not imply that every charismatic person succeeds. But it does imply that all successful people possess some level of charisma. To sum up, riches and material possessions are not accurate markers of success. It is, in fact, the result of success. To be successful, one has to be able to conquer life's challenges, have a good outlook, and be charming.

Sample 9:

Many people believe that the amount of money and other material possessions a person has in his life are the best indicators of his success. However, I feel that financial stability is not the most important factor in determining an individual's success. A successful human is defined by a harmonious combination of a loving family, a bright career, and good health. Every individual has his or her unique way of feeling fulfilled. Even while wealthy and prosperous people are regarded as the most successful, they may not feel the same way about themselves. For instance, a millionaire businessman with $2 billion in income is regarded as a successful entrepreneur by many. Despite the fact that he has yet to attain his intended goals and hence feels dissatisfied with his accomplishment. Furthermore, individuals set their own objectives, no matter how big or small, based on their wants and interests. And achieving those goals through pure hard work and dedication is a personal achievement for them. As a result, the actual measure of victory is a sense of fulfillment. Apart from income, there are a lot of other elements that contribute to a person's success. To begin with, a caring and supportive family will always encourage an individual to focus on his goals and make him feel whole. Additionally, having a dream career is another method to find fulfillment in life. Finally, these elements, when combined with good health, provide an excellent combination for achieving success. As people who sustain a healthy balance between work and life are better than those who have enough money to buy anything in the world but lack calmness. To summarize, success means different things to different people. While some people associate wealth with success, I believe that a sense of accomplishment gained through satisfaction is the true measure of success.

Sample 10:

Money and luxuries are widely accepted as a measure of victory. A person's success, in my opinion, cannot be defined by their belongings or credits. Money will always provide a sense of fulfillment in life, but it will never provide a sense of fulfillment in the soul. In the following paragraphs, I will explain why. People who have a lot of money may not be happy. They could be sobbing uncontrollably due to their unsatisfactory lives. Finances are viewed as a measure of prestige under traditional society standards. A successful person has a perfect blend of a loving family, a promising career, and good health. If a student does not study for an exam, he or she may fail. He won't be able to pass the exam with money. Money isn't as valuable as hard labor. A person's fortune does not imply that he or she has made money. Everyone would have prosperity if it was free. The truth is that only a small percentage of people are dedicated and conscientious. Positive mental, happiness, and satisfaction are derived when people are more effective and productive with what they do. The honey of success isn't bought with money. It all depends on how hard we work and how satisfied we are with the results. Thomas Edison's story is a classic example. He experimented with the filament hundreds of times before inventing the most renowned light bulb. Rather than his fortune, it was his hard work and brilliance that made him successful. To summarize, I feel that in order to be successful, people must be diligent and motivated to work on their ambition. Rather than depend on money for all of the reasons stated above. If a person derives success from their life experiences and depicts it as a victory. This attitude will inspire him to avoid squandering energy and chase a more modern and higher peak. Individual achievement differs, but happiness and fulfillment are the true indicators of success.

Sample 1:

Many feel that strict teaching better encourages academic excellence. In my opinion, though there is value in discipline, it is more important to motivate hard work through healthier means.

On the one hand, a harsh teacher can ensure a basic minimum of good behavior. Most individuals will remember a strict teacher from their childhood who carefully monitored and inspired fear. The punishment for not paying attention, cheating, or performing badly would be a critical comment at best and, at worst, corporal punishment. This fear of being physically or mentally injured is the primary catalyst that then compels hard work and discourages misbehavior. Though modern viewpoints categorize this as abuse, there is little doubt that it was effective in the past at curbing the actions that negatively affect academic performance.

However, to inspire a healthy attitude towards achievement, teachers must foster a more positive learning environment. The above-mentioned methods, including both positive and negative reinforcement, focus on the external opinion of teachers and, by extension, society at large. This can overburden students and stands in contrast to a freer learning style that encourages students to explore their own passions, make mistakes, and learn simply for the sake of learning. Evidence for the superiority of this approach can be found in recent research showing the impact of a positive mindset on learning and the importance of growing in a safe environment without the risk of punishment. Following this approach is therefore more likely to result in a long-lasting positive attitude towards learning.

In conclusion, despite the value of strict discipline for discouraging bad behavior, it cannot motivate passionate commitment as well as more modern methodologies. Teachers should strive for a balance but focus on a friendly atmosphere that allows for self-expression.

Sample 2:

Teachers play a vital role in mentoring students and the skills acquired by them during their academic tenure reveal their hard work. One school of thought believes that teachers should be very strict in the classroom while others believe that the amiable nature of instructors yields better results. I believe that combination of both models could potentially produce favourable results; these two models will be analysed in the essay.

Proponents of hard teaching style believe that if the student feels petrified from their instructor, they will become more disciplined and organised. The strict behaviour of teachers helps in maintaining classroom ethics. For instance, I was usually weak in mathematics in my bachelor's program, it was the stringent nature of the instructor that kept me terrified, and I worked hard to achieve decent grades. Teachers who develop the image of strict pedagogues tend to control the classroom environment more effectively. Moreover, students submit their assignment on time, remain punctual, respect their instructor and do not create a mess in the classroom.

On the contrary, the harsh attitude of a teacher kills the creative skills of a student. Amiable nature improves collaboration between the two. Students afraid of their teacher tend to avoid asking questions, and they might struggle in absorbing the lecture which will impact their academic grades. For instance, students generally prefer frank and polite instructors in their project work, because they believe that they can discuss problems with them in greater detail than with strict and arrogant teachers. Moreover, the friendly attitude of instructor helps students in sharing their view and discussing their problems.

To recapitulate, the aforementioned provide plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, in my opinion, instructor and student bond should be a blend of both models as it will not only help in maintaining the required discipline but will also improve collaboration in the class.

However, others argue that it depends on the student’s attributes. In this essay, I will discuss both views in the upcoming fourth paragraph.

On the one hand, teachers play a significant role in student life. Good tutors motivate or demotivate their pupils. For example, if the child is scoring fewer marks in physics subject or they can try to get a good score and impress his tutor. In contrast, the bad behaviour of the educator hurts student confidence that can be affected to learn their lesson. Thus, the tutor can know their pupils’ strengths and weaknesses which can be helpful for the student to be motivated.

On the other hand, the student can succeed in any field, requiring reasonable effort. If pupils should study hard, then they get the desired score. Such as, no matter how the teacher teaches, if the student is unwilling to learn, they do not achieve a goal. Also, in class with the same teacher, students do not get good scores or get good scores. As a result, hard work and self-learning success in life without a good educator.

To sum up and offer my position, I support the latter view. A good student does not need a good tutor. Children who learn anywhere without a teacher need reasonable effort to succeed. However, good teachers also play a good role in student life.

Sample 2:

In recent decades, many researchers have studied the significance of educational success, owing to which it is generally argued whether the character of the scholar relies on educational success or not. Both views are discussed in the following paragraph, along with my perspective.

On the one side, there are a plethora of reasons why a good teacher has a big hand in the educational success of learners. The first and foremost reason is that mentoring students develops their mind, which is fruitful for their holistic development. So that individual becomes successful. Besides this, this pupil also develops their cognitive skills, which could lead to scholars earning a good amount of capital in future. Take Canada as an epitome, which showed that the teacher’s role is more valuable than other factors in student life for the pupils’ success. As a result, it is constructive development and drastically improves students’ lives.

On the other side, few individuals opine that another key factor, such as the character of the learners, is significant for success. This is because, provided that the pupils are punctual, they perform Every task at the proper time and do hard work in order to accomplish triumph in their life. Furthermore, youngsters also have self-discipline and confidence, which is advantageous for their physical and mental health. For instance, in 2016, the United Kingdom’s authority revealed that youth become eager beavers and attain educational success because of punctuality in their character. Consequently, it is the ideal choice to achieve success in scholarly life.

Having concluded, although the responsibility for favourable educational achievement is of the pedagogue, I believe the individual’s character depends on the learner’s success.

Sample 3:

A highly controversial issue today relates to whether teachers have a big impact on the student’s educational success or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then explain why I believe the arguments for the importance of the teacher’s role are stronger.

There are people who argue that most qualified students had been impacted by their excellent teachers in some way during their life. The main reason for believing this is that great educators always want to extract the maximum for their learners even if it is necessary to dedicate their extra time to it. It is also possible to say that some students could spend more time learning new subjects to impress their teacher. To illustrate, in my high school where I started to enjoy studying physics because of my excellent teacher’s didactic and due to it I graduated in Civil Engineering five years ago.

On the other hand, others believe that who determines success is the student himself. It is often argued that the only person responsible for your success is yourself. People often have this opinion because of countless cases where some individuals did not have the internet to study and can achieve their goals on their own. A second point is that if you did not dedicate yourself to learning your subjects, a good teacher could not make any difference in their future. For example, some students who do not enter universities even study in rich’s schools by their whole life, while some poor people enter to it studying alone.

In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that a good teacher can make the path to success much easier to achieve. This is because they will help the student to focus on the right path and to expand their ideas.

Sample 1:

Everyone has a dream to go abroad for studies or a job. Some people dream of a tour to some abroad countries. This was impossible a few years back for most people. Nowadays, it has become very common. People relocate to different nations in search of better employment, and an increasing number of them choose to bring their families with them. In this essay, we will discuss if this phenomenon has more advantages than disadvantages. We will also see what the reasons for this development are. 

No one wants to leave their family and stay somewhere else. It has many negative impacts on their life. This is the main reason; people nowadays take their family with them. There are multiple advantages of this, starting with manpower. Suppose a working couple moves abroad with their 2-year-old son. Now when both parents go to work, there is no one to take care of the children. If they take their parents and other family members, it will be easier for the child to grow up. The second is loneliness. It is possible for each person to experience loneliness and isolation when they move to a new nation. People feel lonely when they have no friends and family. They are relatively new to the area and making friends might take a long time. They might also get distracted in life and get addicted to alcohol or other addictive drugs. As a result, it is undeniable that moving to a foreign country in search of more pay and a better job has a negative impact on specific families. This negative impact can be neutralized if the family travels along with them. There are more advantages also. Their children get an education abroad and they get to see new places. They become more advanced technologically in life. In view of both improved standards and facilities in the educational system, it is advantageous that pupils have access to a larger learning environment. Let us take an example of a man who works in a technical company in the US and stays with his wife and kids. His kids can increase their practical knowledge instead of concentrating mostly on theory like in Vietnam. In other words, it is indisputable that children who have the assistance of both parents during their formative years will experience a better parenting process. Rather than those who do not have access to either their moms or fathers. We can say that raising kids in a foreign country also opens many doors for them. Not only that, but their parents also get to see a new world. They are able to give their parents a well-deserved treat. Yes, they might miss their homeland but the facilities that they get abroad are much more advantageous. 

I believe that taking the family abroad and staying has much more advantages than disadvantages. It provides a better and more suitable life. Also, they earn more abroad and avail all the facilities provided. Hence, if someone gets a chance, they should travel abroad and see the world with their family. 

Sample 2:

These days, a lot of people move abroad to find jobs, and frequently they bring their families along. This tendency has both positive and negative aspects. But in my opinion, the positives outweigh the drawbacks, and the following article will go into detail on each. Many people think that taking their families and working abroad will help them greatly for a variety of reasons.

First of all, many individuals think that working abroad will increase their income. In turn, their families' level of life and financial situation will improve, particularly for those who migrate from developing to developed nations. Another reason some families are relocating abroad is so that their children might receive a better education in the new nation. For instance, some Indonesians are moving permanently to Australia and finding employment there. They are doing this in the hopes that their children would be able to attend one of the country's top colleges. Last but not least, expatriate employment will improve and diversify the workers' and their family’s quality of life. In addition to learning a new language and making plenty of new friends, they might get the chance to go to numerous locations in the new nation. There are some drawbacks that people should be aware of despite all the advantages of working abroad and bringing up the family. There is a potential that the family members will experience culture shock because some traditions and habits may not match them. For instance, many Westerners might not be familiar with the custom of the Japanese people, who will bow their heads when they meet others. Then, the worker's family members may experience some challenges adjusting to the regional cuisine. Due to the fact that most Asian dishes use spices and chilies, many Westerners find Asian cuisine to be unappealing. In conclusion, it is accurate to say that more people are moving abroad today, and most of them do so with their families. Having a family relocate to a new nation has both advantages and disadvantages. But in my opinion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages if we can adjust to the new surroundings and culture.

Sample 3:

Due to globalization, an increasing number of people are choosing to work abroad with their families. Some people believe that this strategy will be advantageous for family connections. Others counter that they shouldn't bring their family because it might have some bad impacts. We shall thus examine both perspectives in order to determine which strategy is best.

To begin with, there are a lot of negative consequences to leaving your family behind. First of all, it may make it more difficult to forge lasting connections. For instance, if your family is not physically present, distance may erode the bond. Given that some people cannot handle long-distance relationships, it might even result in separation. Second, it can result in increased financial strain on the families. As an example, it is frequently seen that people who live and work overseas might share their residences with others and as a result pay less rent. However, if families are already taken, they will need to rent the entire property. If a person has a large family, this may be very difficult. Finally, the family members must deal with a number of issues in a foreign nation. Children and older individuals frequently endure culture shock and linguistic challenges when they immigrate to a new country. It serves as an example of this. If a person has a large family, this may be very difficult. Finally, the family members must deal with a number of issues in a foreign nation. Since having more members means making more money. Last but not least, it will be really beneficial for the kids because this age needs to be stressed more and they require both parents' love and care. By residing in a developed nation, they can also benefit from improved educational and employment opportunities. Finally, it can be said that both strategies have advantages and disadvantages when it comes to family issues. Personally, I think the decision should be up to the individual. Taking blood relations is the greatest option if he is financially able to handle the responsibilities. And if he is incapable of doing so, it is preferable to travel alone at first.

Sample 1:

In the age of email and telephone communication, the perception of interpersonal connections being less personal has become prevalent. I partially agree with this view, acknowledging the benefits and drawbacks of these technological advancements. While it is true that emails and telephone conversations lack the physical presence and non-verbal cues of face-to-face communication, they have undoubtedly facilitated efficient and timely interactions.

The primary drawback is the absence of non-verbal communication, such as facial expressions and body language, which play a crucial role in conveying emotions and intentions. In personal interactions, these cues contribute significantly to understanding the context and depth of the conversation. However, with the advent of email and telephone conversations, these elements are often lost, leading to potential misunderstandings.

On the positive side, these communication tools have broken down geographical barriers, enabling people to connect across vast distances. Business negotiations, family updates, and friendships can be maintained and strengthened with the click of a button or the dialing of a number. This efficiency in communication has allowed for a more interconnected world, fostering collaboration and understanding among diverse individuals.

In conclusion, while email and telephone communication may lack the personal touch of face-to-face interactions, they have undeniably revolutionized the way we connect and share information. Striking a balance between the convenience of technology and the richness of personal interactions is crucial for maintaining meaningful relationships in this digital age.

Sample 2:

The assertion that modern communication methods, such as email and telephone conversations, have led to a reduction in the personal nature of interactions is a complex matter. While it is true that these technologies can lack the richness of face-to-face communication, they have also introduced new dimensions to human connections that should not be overlooked.

Undoubtedly, the absence of physical presence in email exchanges and telephone conversations limits the range of expressive elements available. Non-verbal cues, including facial expressions and body language, are integral to understanding the emotional nuances of a conversation. However, the convenience and speed afforded by these technologies cannot be ignored. In today’s fast-paced world, the ability to communicate instantly, irrespective of geographical distances, has become a necessity.

Moreover, the written record provided by emails allows for a more thoughtful and precise exchange of information. Unlike verbal communication, which is often fleeting, written messages can be revisited and analyzed, fostering clarity and avoiding misinterpretations. This aspect enhances the quality of communication, especially in professional settings where precision is paramount.

On the contrary, personal interactions offer a depth of connection that is challenging to replicate through electronic means. The warmth of a smile, the firmness of a handshake – these elements contribute to a sense of intimacy that is often absent in virtual exchanges. Face-to-face communication is also more conducive to building trust, as it allows individuals to assess sincerity through subtle cues that electronic communication may lack.

In conclusion, the impact of email and telephone communication on the personal nature of interactions is a nuanced issue. While they may fall short in certain aspects, the efficiency and precision they offer contribute positively to the overall landscape of human connection.

Sample 3:

The assertion that modern communication technologies, particularly email and telephone conversations, have diminished the personal nature of human interaction oversimplifies a multifaceted reality. While it is true that these mediums lack certain elements inherent in face-to-face communication, a more nuanced perspective reveals that they have ushered in a new era of connectivity and efficiency.

At its core, communication is about the exchange of ideas and emotions, and while face-to-face interactions excel in conveying nuanced emotions through non-verbal cues, email and telephone conversations provide unparalleled convenience and accessibility. In an era where global connections are essential, these technologies have dismantled barriers, enabling instant communication across continents.

The argument against the personal nature of email and telephone exchanges often centers around the absence of non-verbal cues. However, this perspective neglects the richness of written communication. Emails, for instance, allow individuals to articulate thoughts with precision and provide a documented trail that can be revisited, fostering clarity and avoiding misunderstandings. In professional settings, this written record is invaluable for reference and accountability.

Furthermore, the efficiency offered by email and telephone conversations cannot be overstated. In the hustle and bustle of modern life, the ability to convey information rapidly and asynchronously has become indispensable. The convenience of sending an email or making a quick phone call transcends geographical boundaries, making it possible for individuals to maintain connections and collaborations without being physically present.

In conclusion, while face-to-face communication remains unparalleled in its ability to convey the full spectrum of human emotions, the advent of email and telephone conversations has revolutionized the way we connect. It is not a matter of one diminishing the other; rather, these mediums complement each other, contributing to a diverse and dynamic tapestry of human interaction.

Sample 4:

In my opinion, utilizing new procedures of communication like email or telephone do not harm human interaction or connection; instead, it makes it more successful.

To start with, it is precious for students and employees who remain in a foreign nation to use email, the web and cell phone to remain connected with their loved one’s members and relatives. Before we had phones and emails, those folks could barely speak with their family, as a result of this modern technology. Twenty years ago, my uncle was in this same nation, and he would barely contact his family since letter-writing was the only method to convey afterwards. So, I would say those contemporary technologies have enhanced how we communicate nowadays.

Moreover, contemporary communication saves time and price. The rate of electronic emails and telephone calls are overpowering, and individuals are creating many friends beyond bounds. In my opinion, those are personal, and technology has made it feasible to maintain more personal relationships than ever before. By way of instance, Facebook helped me locate many of my childhood friends and that I have a fantastic friendship with them today. In my view, it is a fantastic case to illustrate how technology has significantly enhanced our private connection. Next, individuals nowadays store, pay bills and perform banking online and also these online actions save their private time they can spend with their family and friends. What is more, emails have very positive impacts in maintaining the bond between individuals more private as a result of its attributes that allow sharing images, videos and files that are important. Folks may now communicate with virtual physical existence that’s called video calling, and this makes communication more straightforward and more successful.

In conclusion, I would love to state that phone and email have an extremely positive effect on communication and relationships. Without those, we would have been isolated and lonely than we could imagine.

Sample 5:

Telephone and email are the results of technological advancement. The modern communication system has made our life comfortable and less laborious. In my view using new methods of communication like telephone or email do not hurt human interactions or relations, rather it makes it more effective.

To initiate with, it is very helpful for students and workers who stay in a foreign country to use email, the Internet and mobile phone to stay connected with their family and relatives. Before we had emails and telephones, those people could scarcely communicate with their family members. For instance, one of my cousins studies in New Zealand and he calls and sends emails to his family and friends regularly. Thanks to modern technology. Twenty years ago, my uncle had been in this same country, and he could rarely contact his family as letter-writing was the only way to communicate then. So, I would say those modern technologies have improved the way we communicate these days.

Moreover, modern communication saves time and cost. The speed of electronic mails and phone calls are overwhelming, and people are making many friends beyond boundaries. In my view those are all personal and technology has made it possible to keep more personal relationships than ever before. For example, Facebook helped me find many of my childhood friends and I have a good friendship with them now. This, in my opinion, is a good example to illustrate how technology has improved our personal relationships.

Next, people nowadays shop, pay bills and do banking online and these online activities save their personal time that they can spend with their friends and family members. Furthermore, emails have quite positive impacts in keeping the bond between people more personal due to its features which allow sharing pictures, videos and important files. People can now communicate in virtual physical presence which is known as video calling and this makes communication easier and more effective.

To sum up, I would like to say that telephone and email have a very positive impact on our relationship and communication. Without those, we would have been more isolated and lonelier than we can imagine.

Sample 6:

It is often suggested that machinery advancements, namely phones and emails have gained popularity, which results in a lack of personal face-to-face communications. Personally, I completely agree with this view for a variety of reasons.

To begin with, people when using phones or sending emails cannot concentrate on detailed ideas or information. This means that individuals can miss out on visual cues and lose in translations as well as lack professional interactions. In fact, while listening and talking online are very convenient, people cannot feel natural when they miss physical conversations. For example, in some companies, when employees send emails to their manager for results or help, they often trust the leader's announcements and accept their demands without a doubt. Therefore, this also leads to the fact that critical conversations in an organisation are complicated to tackle in immediate situations, which can decline business progress.

Furthermore, getting acquainted with email or phone can prevent opportunities for people to learn from other experiences. This is because modern communications separate individuals from face-to-face interactions with each other. As a result, it can affect not only human interactions but also close-knit relationships. For instance, students with high-tech devices are not allowed to talk to their friends via phone screens to teach new lessons, communicate with relatives as well as cooperate with social communication.

In conclusion, it is widely believed that meeting each other via sending emails or calling is not personal enough. In my opinion, I'm more convinced that individuals should participate in face-to-face meetings or conversations to interact with them comfortably and expand international relationships.
Sample 7:

It is believed that modern ways of communication like email and telephone are less personal than talking face-to-face. This essay disagrees with the fact that the young generation are adapting to these modes and folk who are less confident in person are able to communicate and express themselves better through them.

It is true that most people are not able to communicate better through phone or email, as they miss out on visual cues and a lot is lost in translation. Moreover, the human mind has evolved in such a way that it is accustomed to seeing faces while talking or listening; therefore, it feels natural while conversating physically. Some people often trust each other less if they are on a phone or they are emailing, rather than meeting in person. This also leads to the fact that critical conversations in an organization are done through in-person meetings rather than through phone calls or emails.

On the other hand, youngsters are getting used to telephone communication, since they are born amongst technological advancements. For them, it is indifferent as they are adapted to talk on phones or through text. Also, people who are less confident while talking physically prefer talking on phones and they are able to express themselves in a better way. Furthermore, these ways of communication are much more accessible and feasible. For instance, it helps people from different countries to talk without any problems. Sometimes, even if people are close, they have no option but to rely on these devices. For instance, during a pandemic, they help people to connect with their loved ones.

To conclude, I disagree that people are less personal while communicating through these devices. In fact, I believe that these communication modes are changing people’s way of conversation including the way they express their emotions, as evident from the case of youngsters and people who are less confident.

Sample 8:

Nowadays, technology plays a vital role in interacting with the public. Many individuals believe that people are less likely to do face-to-face interaction due to technological gadgets such as the telephone and email. I strongly agree with this view. I will explain my paintings in the ensuing paragraphs.

There are multiple reasons for this situation. The first and foremost cause is that it is a faster and easier way of conversation. Individuals can talk with their near and clearly whenever and whatever they want. They do not need to go out of their houses. They can send their message in fewer seconds. Another concrete reason is that they can express themselves without any fear or hesitation. Some people cannot show their feelings openly. Hence, they like to use these gadgets. For instance, these days many chatting applications are available due to technological devices. Therefore, some introverted persons prefer to do chatting to tell their inner voice without any discouragement.

Moreover, it is a more interesting way to tell your things. In this facility, the community can send some photos or videos to the receiver. It makes your conversation interesting also, there are some emojis also available to make communication funny. Apart from that, societies can save their talks with their person for a longer period. There are many facilities available to do it, such as audio recordings and many more; consequently, they can memories the good times whenever they want, last but not least, it is an affordable way for wealthy people as well as poor people.

To conclude, restate my opinion that all generally use this new invention for myriad reasons nevertheless, personal talk is still significant in some situations to avoid misunderstanding.

Sample 9:

In this techno-savvy world, machinery advancements namely phones and emails have gained popularity tremendously. Some people opine that because of such mediums, the connection between the individuals is rarely confidential than in the past. This essay will highlight why such inventions are extremely crucial for improving the private relationship of the masses.

To begin with, the inventions of mobile phones and the internet have significantly improved the relationships between people as they can easily contact their loved ones through such machinery. Nowadays, most people are more money minded than ever before, and prefer to work for a prolonged period. The development of the telephone and email has helped in making contact and staying in touch with their families and friends. For instance, a survey taken recently by the Nepal Marital Law office stated that the divorce rate has abated significantly in recent years among the population whose partner are working in another nation due to the availability of the telephones, email and the internet. Therefore, such inventions have enhanced the connection among people both personally and professionally, and also for another reason discussed below.

Furthermore, telephones and emails are considered a reliable way to remain up-to-date about the daily happenings of our loved ones. Individuals can communicate with anyone at any time all across the globe in any topic and is the only medium to remain connected with anyone in another nation. To illustrate, a survey taken recently by the Malaysian Information Centre stated that 49% of the masses assert that the phones and the internet has helped in brushing up their relationship with their families and friends.

In conclusion, the innovations of such technologies have optimistic repercussions in communication among people both personally and professionally.

Sample 1:

In this modernization era, transportation modes have turned the whole world into small villages. Presently, some masses assert that spending a significant amount on the fastest transportation modes is necessary. In contrast, others say that the government must use the money on other factors such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Here. I would like to accord both viewpoints with my perception.

To begin with, it could be argued that providing citizens with faster forms of public transportation has brought about specific benefits. Firstly, more rapid forms of transport help people, particularly commuters, downsize travelling time to and from work. Therefore, people will have more leisure time, which will increase their work productivity. Secondly, people are less likely to be packed in cramped and hot buses by adopting the various modes of conveyance. As a result, one would not be in need to rush to get to work on time or get up so early to get a seat on a bus, and consequently, they will have more time to prepare before going to work or school or to enjoy their breakfast with their family.

Innumerable points can be mentioned to support the opposing view mentioned earlier. Initially, the government should spend money on the eco-friendly transport system. Specifically, excessive personal vehicle use reduces natural resources such as oil, fuel, and others, so it is imperative to make eco-friendly modes for people. Thus, more eco-friendly sources mean less traffic and less air contamination, which is fruitful for the environment. Moreover, in this inflation era, the government must reduce the transportation cost so that anyone can take public transport service and the prices of food and other necessities dependent on transport do not increase. Other than that, other crucial fields the government should focus on are healthcare, drinking water and education.

To reiterate, I believe that there are many long-term benefits of improved methods of transportation. Still, we cannot be oblivious to its impacts on cost and the environment.

Sample 2:

Several individuals say that governments should spend money to improve faster means of public transportation; however, others think that there are more issues that need to be prioritized than public vehicles. Personally, I agree with both views because of some major reasons which I shall explain in more detail in this essay.

To begin with, it is clear that the government should prioritize investing in faster means of public transport in big cities because the problems of traffic congestion and pollution from the emission of vehicles are increasingly serious in these. This causes negative effects on people's physical and mental health. For example, in big cities in my country, Vietnam, people face traffic jams for hours every day after work in peak time. They have to absorb an amount of emission from different vehicles during that time unexpectedly. This makes citizens feel very tired and just want to stay at home and go to sleep after work. Consequently, individuals living in modern cities in my country is easy to have sick and limited socialization as well as enhancing pressure of travelling.

On the other hand, if the government allocates finance to provide public transport in the countryside where the population is less than in the modern city is not justified because there are many more urgent problems such as a lack of education of youngsters from poor families. For instance, in my hometown where the residents are small, only a few vehicles are on the streets but there are a major number of children coming from problem families needing help to access education. Therefore, in this case, spending to help children improve their living standards and go to school is more necessary than public transport.

In conclusion, in this essay, I support the idea that governments should spend money to improve faster means of public transportation in modern cities where there are big troubles with traffic and pollution. Additionally, emphasize investing in other issues such as disadvantageous finance, education, and so on. in rural areas where the population is too little to use public transportation.

Sample 3:

These days it is believed that increasing the speed of public transit should receive the majority of funding from the state while others claim that other aspects such as cost, and the environment should be prioritized. Both viewpoints are reasonable but personally, I would lean towards the latter.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people advocate investing money in making public transit faster. Firstly, this practice would help reduce citizens' daily commuting time. Therefore, they would have more spare time for their interests, study or work, which can eventually increase their overall productivity. Secondly, faster means of mass transit can also help reduce the incidence of passengers being packed in cramped and hot public vehicles. For example, those people would not need to rush to get to work on time or get up so early in order to get a seat on a bus, and therefore they will have more time to prepare before going to work or school, or to enjoy their breakfast with their family.

On the other hand, I am convinced that the authorities should consider allocating budgets for other important alternatives such as costs or the environment. The first reason is that a reduction in the price of public transit would benefit many people, especially low-income commuters. This could help them travel to their desired destinations faster and more conveniently on a daily basis. In addition, a more environmentally friendly public transit system could greatly contribute to saving the environment. This is because the levels of air pollution would be significantly reduced due to the lower consumption of fossil fuels.

In conclusion, why there may be some reasons to support mainly pouring money into making mass transit travel more quickly, I strongly believe that they are stronger reasons for the government to provide financial support for other priorities like cars and the environment.

Sample 4:

Nowadays there is an idea of whether the authority should spend money on making means of transport with higher speed or using it for other aims. While some people think that quicker shipping is more necessary, I would argue that there are more priorities which need more concentration.

There is a common belief that transit with high speed should be taken into consideration by politicians. A reason for this thought is that faster shipping will help people travel through streets much quicker, which reduces traffic jams during rush hour. Consequently, this solution will save much time for commuters in the centre of the city, who have usually been affected by traffic problems. Furthermore, having more kinds of transport with high speed helps companies reduce the time for shipping goods. This advantage brings about more consensus with their partner, which gives businesses countless opportunities to gain profit. For example, DHL, a logistic company, has made a huge profit these years by creating modern transportation with higher speed.

However, the benefits of spending funds on other priorities are far more significant. One reason for this is that if the authorities use the money on our infrastructures, the life of residents will be improved dramatically. Community buildings such as parks, cinemas and shopping centres. For instance, Hanoi has recently established a new supermarket in the centre of the city, which makes it more convenient for people to buy groceries without having to travel too far. Moreover, governments should take the environment into account. Using cash to reduce the effect of global warming and pollution will save nature. As a result, our offspring can have good conditions to live in and continue to develop their lives.

In conclusion, it seems to me that although quicker means of transport are essential, the benefits of spending funds on other aims are more important. It is recommended that the authority should concentrate on many other significant priorities.

Sample 5:

In this concurrent world, a number of people believe the authorities may increase their funding in fast public transportation. Otherwise, others believe the environmental cost from transportation should be considered in order to preserve mother nature. In this essay, I will give my own perspectives and provide an explanation as well.

On the one hand, time is important nowadays, bustling people should manage their time. The faster public transportation could provide many advantages for communities to reduce their journey times. For Example, In the Capital City of Indonesia, from Lebak Bulus station to Bundaran Hotel Indonesia (HI) station require more than an hour by private car. However, with Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) the journey is more efficient with only 30 minutes. As a result, more people tend to use MRT for work or any other activity due to efficiency.

On the other hand, environmental and social parameters are the same important to sustaining the city as well as empowering the communities. Recently, environmental issues such as household waste and pollution are the government's main concern. According to Sustainable Development Goals from United Nations, these two issues should be mitigated by all nations worldwide because the long-term effects could lead to an undesirable impact on the environment. For Instance, pollution might be a main cause of global warming, hence, household waste could lead to environmental damage such as water pollution.

In conclusion, I believe faster public transportation is beneficial for society to establish a better lifestyle as long as the government has a high willingness to an environmental parameter to reduce and mitigate an undesirable effect in the future.

Sample 6:

Owing to the various requirement that humans are struggling with, some individuals believe to allocate financial resources to enhance the speed of commuting infrastructures, while the opponents have mentioned the other priorities, such as environmental issues, as more essential realms to concentrate on. However, in my point of view, without the capacity of living on the earth, societies' achievement about pace would not be usable, therefore, saving the nature is more vital. Different sides are explained here.

One of the most highlighted benefits of exploiting high-speed public vehicles has to do with the needed development in the contemporary era, not only to increase the knowledge in various realms but also to rescue from the probable threats. To enlighten, if people have the capability to decrease the hours on way, then it is feasible to concentrate on their project more fruitfully. As a vivid case, neither lack of time nor tiredness of long access routes are irritating, while the saved time could be allocated to new inventions for the future, especially in the sector of the military part to defend against both other nations r the aliens. Furthermore, by qualifying such services, divergent obstacles would be addressed, namely, either air pollution or even the annoying traffic of the metropolises. Actually, multitudes of city-dwellers that used to be reluctant toward sharing machines, like buses or trains, would be attracted to them if were witnesses of the fortified qualification.

On the other hand, nowadays, humans are encountered with the results of ignoring the ecosystem, whereas they would be surrounded by more of them in the future if they do not revise their treatment. As a vivid case, the alternations of the weather condition that has taken place is considered as an offspring of the emitted green-house gasses from the cars' exhausts, based on the scientists' claims. Moreover, it is possible for the human race to vanish from the globe due to the lack of food or loss of the residential circumstance potentials of the earth. Based on the released news, the number of some creatures have skyrocketed in absence of their predators that have been eradicated as an offspring of human's functions. For instance, the rate of the rats, as a form of spreading divergent diseases like leishmaniasis, have swelled, when the snakes have been hunted for their skins or their poisons in some vicinities around the world.

To recapitulate, while some alleged the existing wealth should be dedicated to ascending the speed of transportation, which not only is required but also is necessary to use the time more efficiently in the technology era, others notice the importance of the role of the environment in people lives, which need to absorb the investments. Ultimately, to me, to utilize rapid vehicles, firstly, the menacing factors should be tackled.

Sample 7:

What the government should give the highest priority when creating public transport. Some people think that the union should spend more money on providing faster means of public transport. On the other hand, others believe that the authority should focus more on other important aspects such as cost or environment. This essay, as my opinion leads to, will try to elaborate on both points of view and my own idea with some considerations.

To commence with, it is true that time is money and there are some people who think that they do not want to spend time going to work as little time as possible. In other words, faster transportation is very effective for people and the government should spend more money. For example, there are both normal trains and bullet trains in Japan. The fees of the latter trains are not cheap, but these vehicles are three times faster than normal trains which you usually use. In Japanese society, a lot of workers use bullet trains to go to work every morning and they consider bullets trains very convenient.

On the other hand, I personally believe that it should be noted that the government must focus more on the environment. That is to say, more eco-friendly trains will be required in the near future. It is mainly because human activities are the main cause of global warming. To give an illustration of this, a lot of means of transport generate carbon dioxide, leading to an increase in the levels of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere. Therefore, there is no doubt that the environmental issue is one of the serious problems all over the globe and the union should deal with this problem.

To sum up, it is true that both points are crucial when it comes to developing means of public transport; however, I personally think that measures against environmental problems are given the highest priority in today's world.

Sample 8:

There are conflicting views regarding whether the government should spend money on public transport or other emergent issues like social welfare costs and environmental protection. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, followed by my perspective on this matter.

People who consider the government should invest in public transport may put forth the following argument. It is undeniable that the time we spend commuting is becoming longer and longer because of traffic congestion, which wastes lots of our time. For instance, we will have less time to dedicate ourselves to working if we spend one or two hours on the bus or underground, impairing productivity. In the long run, economic development will be impeded by the deterioration of the traffic situation. Moreover, it is detrimental to people’s health. For example, lots of people are reluctant to go outside to socialize with their friends because they cannot accept that they have to spend a long time on travel, which will make them lack the opportunity of communicating with others and taking outdoor activities, such as climbing, posing a threat to both their mental and physical health.

Nevertheless, those who think governments should invest in other social and environmental problems can also justify their opinions. For one thing, it is common to see that the budget of governments is tight because of the burden caused by the increasing population. For instance, If the government do not invest more money in social aspects, such as healthcare, the public will complain to the government about they cannot receive enough healthy services, which will lead to their resentment, affecting the social stability. For another, some issues like climate change are threatening people’s lives, and solving such environmental problems will cost lots of money, which could only be solved by the government.

In conclusion, both traffic and other emergent issues like social cost and environmental problems need to be invested equally because solving these problems could bring complimentary benefits.

Sample 9:

Some people support the idea that the government should increase amounts of money on providing faster means of public transport, but other people are against this idea because of the significant primaries. This discussion has some misunderstood aspects such as faster means of public transport cause various issues for societies and natural life. To make it clear, costs and environmental effects are some of the most crucial subjects of this discussion.

Costs are one of the main problems in this situation because faster cars, trains and other transport create more production money, energy cost, and employment. To make it clear, companies or governments that manage public transport spend more money on not only providing vehicles but also workers and energy. As an illustration, if one firm chooses to provide faster vehicles, they must hire more personnel such as managing new systems, and users of vehicles and it will create a massive budget for them.

On the other hand, the health of nature is a critical worry for almost every person and faster public transport is influencing global warming and other dangerous activities. Additionally, faster transport is causing more energy consumption than the others. Consequently, these facets show us new vehicles create more pollution of air, water, and forest. For instance, experts published new research about that, and it demonstrates that faster transportation ways damage the human habitat and natural life.

In conclusion, providing faster means of public transport has fewer positive parts and more efficient and impactful drawback features in there. In my opinion, this type of idea will harm numerous areas of our globe and humanity.

Sample 10:

In politics, exerting the national cost is a hotly-debated issue. Several societies believe that the government should exert money for public installation like shipment, meanwhile, others have a notion that another priority such as the environment is preferable. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall elucidate both perspectives and detail why the first preference is more urgent than the last choice.

To begin with, shipping access for the population is indispensable to developing the economy. It happens because the fast connectivity as an output of concerning to the transport facilities allows people to go instantly. Consequently, it might ameliorate the GNP, and by reason, trading will be easy. Furthermore, if the government exerts the national allocation for this issue, there will be equal economic status in multitudinous areas. To exemplify, Indonesia constructs a plethora of roads in many provinces such as Papua to distribute the equality of the economy. As a result, the price of some products such as fuel in Papua similar when it is compared with the capital.

In contrariety to the earlier paradigm, the public might suggest the policy makers spend the state budget on other priorities like environmental issues. When the state pays attention to the previous problems, it can make sure that the development activity never forgets about the ecosystem. From that case, there will be a green economy and it will help the country to apply the Sustainability Development Goals from the United Nations. Moreover, the state might avoid the natural disasters because many ecosystem components, namely forests, rivers, etc. have been conserved previously, so people will feel safe to stay in their homeland.

In conclusion, there are several paths to spending the national account. Although, exerting it in the environmental agenda makes some benefits, nevertheless, I believe that government should use wisely it for public connectivity such as shipment because it has the potency to escalate the GNP and obliterate the gap among the provinces.

Sample 1:

Excess intake or exposure to anything can be vicious for the human body, and sugar is one of the many evils. While excess consumption of sugar is causing health emergencies worldwide, people are tussling with their opinion about whether individuals should curb and control this themselves or should the government step in. This essay will discuss the same.

Sweets are a savoury delight that almost everyone enjoys. Found in sweets, sugar is among the most addictive substances known to us. Consuming it without a cap is detrimental to us. Additionally, if resolute, an individual’s resolve is virtually unbreakable, and many people opt to either stop consuming sugar or switch to alternatives like Stevia and Sugarfree. This constitutes how individuals can be responsible for their own sugar consumption.

However, the government also contributes to this cause. One way to do this is by taxing the sugary delights and confectionary items. On top of that, the government can promote sugar alternatives and a healthy lifestyle or create their own choice which matches the taste of sugar since the existing substitutes have a flavor that requires time to get used to it, which can hold people back. From a personal standpoint, I feel people should take greater responsibility in this scenario. For instance, I’ve seen people who have diabetes forgo anything that has sugar in it. Similarly, cautious consumption can do greater good than government taxations and awareness campaigns.

To conclude, the growing concern regarding sugar consumption is indeed valid, as it causes various illnesses in the body. I feel that the people can take charge of changing the current setting, and the government can assist them in doing so.

Sample 2:

People know that overconsumption of sugar is detrimental for health but how that should be controlled is somewhat controversial. Many believe that governments ought to shoulder the onus of controlling sugar consumption, yet others place accountability for curbing sugar intake on the individuals. This essay will expound on both views, and I believe that both individuals and governments should take responsibility.

To commence with, controlling sugar intake is an obligation of the authority so as to keep the nation fit and healthy. The authorities spend millions of dollars to treat and prevent diseases, and increasing sugar intake can be responsible for many people falling victim to those diseases. With a comprehensive set of policies, governments can curb overconsumption of sugar efficiently and effectively. They can set standards for sugary foods and restrict the production and sale of harmful sugar items. They can also monitor food supplied to hospitals, workplaces and schools, and run campaigns to make the masses aware of the dangers of higher consumption of sugar and sweet items. Likewise, another effective policy the government can implement is the restriction on sugary food advertising and commercial promotion. Put simply, governments ought to tighten regulations on food advertising to children, including sugary items so that the acceptability, awareness and availability of sugary food advertised are reduced.

On the flip side, individuals are the cornerstone of any business and the money they spend shapes the products sold in the market. In other words, the more consumers tend to purchase sugary products, the more they are produced. If people do not purchase such products enriched in sugar, then it would definitely reduce their production. The boycott of plastic packaging in many places has brought plastic production to a lower level and this is the best example of public responsibility. Similarly, the production of sugary foods will be cut if the individuals boycott those products.

To conclude, excessive sugar intake is harmful to people and both the authority and people should shoulder the onus of reducing the production and intake of sugar. Their collaborative efforts will improve the situation and public health.

Sample 3:

Eating too much sugar may cause some serious problems with health. It is why society wants the law of a country to do something about that. However, there are people who believe that everyone has to take care of themselves. I think that individuals have to decide alone what they prefer to eat. This essay agrees with this statement.

The government may decrease the possibility of having a chance to buy some sugar which would push humanity to stop feeding themselves with it so often which would have a good impact on their body. However, there may come a situation where some people would still keep purchasing as many sweets as before as it is delicious and addicting. For instance, if someone does not have self-control, they will still do everything just to get that bar of chocolate, unless sugar is going to be forbidden in every shop they will visit.

On the other hand, humans may decide alone about the number of sweets they eat. If he reduces it, he may see soon enough some positive results of it. Which would be getting slimmer. Moreover, once he starts to avoid desserts, he tries his best to keep that in mind and choose more nutritious meals. For example, if he sees a snack in a supermarket, he makes his own decision if he is going to get it or not. This means that if he takes it, he will have to face the consequences alone, which may give him a lesson for the future.

In conclusion, people may wait for the government to make sweets more unavailable around the world, or simply to control their eating habits which is a much better option. As it may teach them to be patient. Also, no power can control your appetite if not you by yourself.

Sample 4:

It is often argued that for the excess usage of glucose, the ministry shall be responsible and should take the control measures, while others believe that it is a personal responsibility for the well-being of their health. In my opinion, I believe that the duty belongs to both, while it is more of a self-responsibility to control the intake of sucrose

First of all, a growing body of research suggests that the government can regulate the measures of carbohydrate consumption by regulating taxes. One key benefit is that by increasing the taxes, the masses would restrict themselves from purchasing, and thereby would reduce the utilization of glucose. Moreover, imposing taxes is only one part of control measures, it is clear that local bodies shall make campaigns, and raise more awareness amongst people for the ill effects of overconsumption of sugar.

However, there are also regulatory paths that must be considered by the population. One major issue is that overconsumption of sucrose leads to serious health effects. This means that it leads to obesity, tooth decay, and worst-case diabetes. For instance, WHO has reported that there is an increase in diabetic patients across the world by 10% per annum.

In conclusion, while authority contributes to controlling the sugar intake by raising awareness, it is also the duty of individuals to be self-aware and help themselves from the consequences like tooth decay, overweight, and majorly diabetes. In my opinion, I believe a person is more responsible for their health. However, I would argue that government should act more aggressively by imposing high duties on sugar and monitoring diabetic patient records via hospitals.

Sample 5:

It is true that sugar is not healthy food, and over consuming it is the primary factor that makes people obese. While some people argue that the government should take some measures to diminish sugar consumption, others believe that controlling sugar intake is up to the individual. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both sides and explain why I think ordinary people should be responsible for their diet.

There are some people who believe that the government should create a way to control the consumption of sugar. First, they believe the government should run campaigns to teach people how unhealthy those carbohydrates are. For example, there are some commercials that try to convince people that smoking is harmful to their health, and the authorities should create commercials with regards to sugar. In addition, they argue that the government is responsible for public health, which means governors should do what is necessary to improve people's health condition.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that individual freedom should be respected. In other words, the government should not worry about their diet because people have the right to decide what they eat. To illustrate, they believe there is numerous the government’s interference in our lives, and campaigning against sugar would be another one. Besides, many people think the authorities can solve all the problems of society, such as over-consuming sugar. Nevertheless, necessary changes come from the society as a whole, not from politicians, and, as a consequence, if society understands that over-consuming carbohydrates is harmful, they will adjust their habits naturally.

In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that individuals should decide whether they will consume carbohydrates. This is because ordinary people know what is better for them and their freedom to eat what they want has to be respected.

Sample 6:

Eating carbohydrate in an amount more than necessary is not healthy. According to a few individuals, the state should take care of this matter while the rest think that people should take control of their own sugar consumption. In my opinion, I believe that everyone should keep a track of their carbohydrate intake. However, this essay will discuss both views.

To begin with, the excess amount of sweetness in food items harms our energy. Likewise, if anyone is practicing this, then he is at a risk of serious well-being problems relating to heart and moreover, it leads to premature aging. Therefore, it is very important to limit sugar going inside our body. For instance, a diabetic patient should monitor and curb the carbohydrates and carbohydrates he is including in his diet, and he should know the consequences of not doing so.

Contrastingly, the government should also take the initiative in this matter in order to protect the fitness of its citizens. Since it has the power to reach a mass crowd, it should organise awareness campaigns to create a sense among people regarding this issue. This should be done often in order to create a sense of awareness among a maximum number. For example, they can organise health programs to educate people about nutrition and obesity and the dangers it can cause.

To conclude, I opine that although the government should take measures to decrease the usage of this substance, I believe that it is self-duty to eat well and maintain the soundness of the body.

Sample 7:

Eating vast amount of sugar is harmful for health. While some individuals opine that it is a state's work to limit the amount, some people believe it is self-liability. In my opinion, the consumer's concern is obvious to choose a proper food-chart for them; however, this essay will discuss both views.

On the one hand, a person himself only can ensure a proper diet. This is because not everyone's body has the same requirement of nutritions and additives; that means, the same volume of sweet intake is not dreadful for all. Likewise, the taste and the recipes also vary among the people; some individuals prefer sugary meals, while some salty. Therefore, it is not possible to identify individuals’ demands, rather people own self can select what is good and bad for their own. Meaning that, if a certain measure of sugar consumption makes anyone sick, he has to cut the amount of it from regular cuisines. For example, a diabetic patient usually curbs carbohydrates from daily dishes to maintain fitness.

On the other hand, awareness programs organized by the administration could prevent citizens from over-eating glucose. Because the government has the power to reach mass people and educate them, which will create a sense among them to avoid white poison. For instance, they can organize medical campaigns to promote the importance of taking nutritionally dense food items, and ignore the items that cause diseases, like obesity. Despite this, no matter how many actions are taken by the country to distribute the knowledge of proper diet, the program will surely fail if individuals have no such concern to follow the plan.

In conclusion, adding too much glucose definitely has negative impacts on the human body. Although the government can inaugurate programmes to decrease the intake of this substance, I believe it is the self-duty to eat well and maintain soundness of body.

Sample 8:

Eating sugar in excessive amounts can lead to health problems. According to some people, governments are responsible for their citizens’ health and hence they ought to control sugar consumption while others opine that it is the duty of individuals. In my opinion, everyone should take care of their own health and control the intake of sugar as they understand their body requirements better than others.

It is the moral duty of the government to keep the nation healthy and fit. There are many ways through which excess sugar consumption can be controlled by the government. Firstly, the government should impose higher taxes on sugar and sugary products. For example, if the government levies a high tax rate on these products, their selling prices will be increased, and people will be discouraged to buy them. Therefore, consumption will automatically go down. Secondly, governments should run health awareness programs to educate people about the adverse ramifications of over sugar intake. If they are aware of the negative side of having excess sugar, they will share the same with their family and friends too and this will motivate them not to include excess sugar in their diet.

On the other hand, no one can take care of a person’s health better than themselves as individuals know their own body requirements better. Also, everyone is different and cannot be measured on the same scale. For instance, if someone has a family history of diabetes then he should take precautions and consume less sugar than the others because he is more likely to develop diabetes. In addition, there are multiple ways through which people can regulate their sugar cravings. For example, they can use sugar-free products instead of real sugar.

To conclude, although governments should take the initiative to control excessive sugar intake, in my opinion, largely, it is the responsibility of individuals to restrict themselves from consuming more sugar and take precautions to avoid any negative consequences on health.

Sample 9:

It is irrefutable that health is the biggest jewel one can possess. People often consider sugar as a slow poison, being said that there is a debate going on among a different group of people. Some people consider that the government should take initiatives to keep sugar consumption under control. While others argue that it is the responsibility of an individual to keep track of one's health. I tend to agree with the latter part of the argument and in this essay, will present my views with examples.

The most significant step that the government bodies can take is passing an amendment to limit sugar in soft drinks. This would help in restricting the sugar contents among all the soft drinks. For example, it has been discovered that sodas are considered as the biggest source of rising obesity, especially in the developed countries. It is because most of these products help in getting rid of food cravings. As a result, a large percentage of people skip their meal and lack nutrients to maintain health.

On the other hand, everyone should give priority to their health. Nowadays, fast food has gained so much attention, as it is easy to get and saves time. People around the globe have forgotten the downside of fast food. To illustrate this, a regular McDonalds meal of two-hundred calories, contains fifty percent more sugar, in contrast to a meal cooked at home of equivalent calories. As a consequence, everyone is less prone to being healthier and more attracted to viruses.

In conclusion, the government support is a huge plus in maintaining a healthy country, by restricting sugar. In my opinion, everyone's health begins at home, and it takes one's own effort to maintain it. We should conserve our health in a similar manner as we conserve our treasures.

Sample 1:

With globalization, people are migrating abroad in search of better job opportunities with higher financial incentives. Some argue that developed countries should not recruit educated and trained labour from developing countries because they need them more. I partially disagree with the statement, since there are limitations for jobs offered in developing countries, which force the unemployed to turn towards foreign countries.

Third-world countries fall under the category of being poor. These nations are nevertheless in the development phase. Despite having a sizable number of qualified applicants, there are only so many seats available, resulting in a sizable portion of the population being jobless. This has an impact on both the country and the people. For instance, India has a huge number of graduates who have appropriate skills. But there are reserved seats for the scheduled castes and tribes, making the general caste helpless. As a last resort, they look for opportunities in developed countries.
People who move abroad to pursue jobs help their families financially. This, in turn, is useful in decreasing poverty in developing countries. This is useful for developed nations as well, because they acquire equally proficient labour from poor countries at a cheaper salary than there.

I also disagree with this, because developing nations can develop and flourish by using the proficiency and expertise of these people. It struggles in the shadows, while developed countries benefit from the success brought by migrant workers. The migrants are treated unfairly; they often receive low pay checks and are discriminated against.

In conclusion, I don't agree with the idea that rich countries shouldn't hire talented people from poor countries because doing so helps the poor countries get rid of poverty and unemployment but also deprives them of developing due to a lack of trained manpower.

Sample 2:

People move to developed countries for better work prospects, which is an unavoidable truth. It is also true that this trend hampers their own nation's growth in a number of ways. For example, it has an influence on the availability of qualified workers in their home country.

Brain drain has long been a major issue. People often move to rich nations in order to receive a high income that compensates for the time and effort they put in to get their degrees. In fact, the chance to move abroad motivates many students to study better in school. For example, acquiring a degree in medicine is quite expensive and labour-intensive. A medical student will be more motivated to put in the effort required to become a doctor if she is confident that, after completing her studies, she will find a fruitful career overseas. Moreover, by having the opportunity to interact with some of the brightest minds on the planet, talented individuals who relocate to a developed nation will be able to further strengthen their capabilities.

On the contrary, due to this migration, the home country suffers in the absence of skilled workers. Just like doctors, people with IT skills are also migrating to countries like Germany and the UK since they provide a better prospect. As a result, there is a lack of qualified IT workers that can help the country progress technologically. Cyber security and privacy are not as advanced as in other countries, putting citizens' personal information at risk.

To conclude, there seems to be no arguing that skilled labour's migration to developed nations limits those countries' national growth. However, each person has the liberty to decide where they prefer to live and work. Certainly, nations could prevent this practice by providing better opportunities within their own borders.

Sample 3:

Some people feel that developed countries recruiting trained human resources from underdeveloped nations should be prohibited because those countries require them more. Everyone has a varied opinion on this statement. I believe that affluent nations should employ manpower from these nations, because it gives the individual a chance to flourish.

Unemployment is significant in various developing countries because these nations have a limited availability of jobs. A huge young population there face rejection due to reserved seats as per the government legislations. Recruiting them resolves the problem of unemployment. For example, business administration aspirants are recruited by various multinational companies. The proverb, “kill two birds with one stone” sits well in this situation as both the companies as well as the individuals are benefitted from it. This also decreases poverty that is prevailing in developing nations. It gives a wider window of progress and knowledge to individuals. For example, the current CEO of Google is an Indian migrant, who moved to America for his job in Google.

Further, when acceptance to international employment is supported, poor nations also win. When advanced economies need skilled employees from the developing world, a demand is produced in those nations, which promotes the development of their internal infrastructure, including better educational institutions. For instance, the Indian tech-related education industry witnessed substantial growth when the United States began recruiting numerous IT personnel in the late twentieth century. Consequently, these employees bring the cosmopolitan culture of developed nations, which alters traditional ideas in third world nations.

To conclude, recruitment of skilled manpower from poor countries is beneficial for both the countries as well as the employees themselves. The education system, infrastructures and so on are improved and advanced. Even the employees achieve their dreams professionally.

Sample 4:

Brain drain is a much-debated issue, and many people believe that developed countries should not provide work for skilled professionals from developing or poor nations since they are better utilised in the homeland. I personally believe that this system should be stopped as it would make poor countries poorer while rich countries would be richer in the long run.

First, poor countries can produce only a handful number of talented people each year through their broken economic and educational system. The government and public money are spent to support those students and professionals and when they are ready to serve the country, rich nations actually hijack them. This is quite unethical, and a majority of the migrated professionals serve the migrated countries than the countries they were born in. This system allows the developed countries to have a large number of talented professionals, scientists, writers, engineers, doctors and so on while poor countries suffer from the scarcity of such experts. These talented and qualified people are the keys to the development of a poor country, and they should serve their motherland.

Second, a developed country already has a large number of skilled labours and expert workers, and they can do quite well without alluring skilled professionals to come and work there. For instance, the number of native astronomers and scientists in the United States is already huge and they could easily do without brain draining talented and skilled professionals from other countries. Rich countries have a natural obligation to actually send their proficient workers to work and train citizens of poor nations for the betterment of the world. Employing skilled labours from other countries is actually a practice that ruins the equilibrium of development in the world.

Finally, many skilled labours that migrate to the first world countries often end up working in a sector which is simply irrelevant to their education and skill and hence is a wastage of talent and time. For instance, many doctors and engineers in first world countries actually work in a restaurant or drive a cab only because they migrated from poor countries and failed to show their worthiness. They could have better served the humanity by being enrolled in their original professions in their homelands.

In conclusion, the better lifestyle and more money are the reasons skilled labours migrate to rich countries and this brain drain system should be stopped for the overall betterment of the world.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, a plethora of individuals are migrating to foreign countries in search of better opportunities, and it is not a new phenomenon. A chunk of individuals opines that this trend will be detrimental for the economy of the country whilst others are skeptical about it. I, however, believe that it has both pros and cons, and we need to delve into both sides before forming any opinions.

To begin with, developed countries get immense benefits by offering jobs to skilled workers outside their country. Firstly, rich countries have complicated modern economies, which require skilled and experienced workers for the efficient operation of the country. Secondly, the corporations employ people from underdeveloped countries so they can reduce the expenditure of the organisation as they pay them less compared to their native workers. For instance, hourly wages are fixed by developed countries therefore they cannot pay less than minimum wage which is mandatory by the authorities.

On the other hand, the situation is indeed harmful to develop countries as they spend enormous money to educate and generate productive labour so they can support their countries’ economies. For instance, it is estimated that India spends billions of dollars on tertiary education but when the time comes to serve the country they migrate to a foreign land. This process is called brain drain. Thus, it increases the wealth gap between countries.

In conclusion, it is true that skilled workers need everywhere. I feel they are needed more in their home countries because they should pay back to their motherland by living there and serving their community. Henceforth, which country should limit the number of foreign field workers.

Sample 1:

It’s become increasingly common for students to experience stress in schools and colleges, often being compelled to work at a young age. This trend has both positive and negative implications, affecting various aspects of human life.

On one hand, I agree that academic pressure adversely impacts students’ mental well-being. Given their developmental stage, they may not possess full awareness or resilience to address all school-related challenges. This can lead to feelings of fatigue, anxiety, and low self-esteem. Consequently, they may turn to alcohol or cigarettes as coping mechanisms. Moreover, allocating excessive time to academic pursuits leaves little room for relaxation and family bonding.

On the other hand, there are benefits to this situation. Firstly, the adage ‘no pressure, no diamonds’ suggests that pressure can motivate individuals to achieve their goals. In fact, many individuals thrive under pressure and perform their best when challenged. Challenges faced by learners include academic competition, tackling complex exercises, and balancing schoolwork with extracurricular commitments such as volunteering or club activities. However, these challenges pale in comparison to the complexities encountered by employees, including hazardous working conditions. Therefore, early exposure to challenges enables individuals to develop problem-solving skills crucial for future employment. Employers gain insight into students’ ability to handle workplace pressures through their academic journey.

In conclusion, while hard work undoubtedly enhances students’ future job prospects, it must be balanced with leisure activities to mitigate mental health challenges.

Sample 2:

It is often considered that the strain on pupils and professors has been rising, and they are forced to perform with more effort, particularly young ones. I completely agree with this approach and reckon that this will lead to more effective results.

First and foremost, this approach brings the seriousness of children towards education. Those who tend to be lazy and lethargic in their studies will be influenced more. As a result, due to strictness in educational establishments, they will perform better and produce greater outcomes. For example, many children in my hometown are performing better than those in the nearby town, due to strict teachers and a tough education system. That is why it is clear that tough educational systems will make brighter students.

Moreover, firing teachers who are lenient and easygoing is a prudent technique. On the other hand, hiring educators in schools who are strict and tough is a good option, because many children will tend to perform effectively under pressure. Additionally, parents will also be satisfied with learning institutes, and they will happily pay a lump-sum amount of fees. To make it clearer, I would like to give an example. American parents pay huge amounts of money to schools for their children's education, because they know the learning institutes in the United States are second to none. They are happy paying the fees because they know their children are forced to work hard and complete the tasks timely. Thus, this approach brings a positive change.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that children should be trained to work harder and more effectively, in order to gain marvelous results.

Sample 3:

Improvement in living standards has brought about more chances for people to get access to education. These days, school and university pupils are facing increasing pressure, and they are forced to learn very hard from their early childhood. From my perspective, there are pros and cons associated with this trend.

On the one hand, this phenomenon can be advantageous in various ways. Youngsters tend to absorb knowledge much more quickly and effectively than old people. Therefore, they should try their best to study and broaden their mind during this ideal period. If students do not spend time learning in their childhood, they may find learning difficult in their later life. For example, the best time for kids to learn a new language is in their 7's as they will memorise new vocabulary and grammatical structure easily. Moreover, having a good education is one of the main factors leading to a successful career. People need to be knowledgeable and highly qualified to have a well-paid job in this competitive world.

On the other hand, forcing students to study too much may have various detrimental consequences on them. Firstly, pupils are likely to suffer from physical and mental health problems. Since they have to sit for lessons and homework all day, they do not have time for leisure and outdoor activities. As a result, being inactive and stressed will lead to diseases such as obesity, heart disease, and depression. Secondly, these pupils may lack interpersonal skills, which are important for their future. They may not know how to socialize well or cooperate with others because they are focusing too much on their studies and paying little attention to society. However, most companies these days require employees to have not only good qualifications but also life skills.

In conclusion, although increasing pressure on students has some benefits, I believe this phenomenon has its drawbacks. Students should try to balance their studies and their lives to lead a healthy lifestyle as well as acquire the necessary abilities.

Sample 4:

In this fast-paced life, people become success-oriented, and everyone is in the race to get high educational qualifications. Undoubtedly, this increases the tension among the school and tertiary level students to become good competitors and therefore, students are put under a high amount of pressure to work hard at a very early age. However, as stress can be a hindrance in the overall development of anyone, it certainly impacts negatively on students.

To begin with, when pupils are under pressure, they do not understand what they have learned, hence, to get a high score they generally prefer rote-learning method. Though this method of learning may be useful to get a good result, it does not make the students' basic knowledge clear. For example, to become a good engineer or a doctor, one must have a thorough understanding of any subject, which is only possible when the students' base is clear.

Moreover, school and college students are agile and impulsive. If they get a lot of burden on their shoulders, they may become aggressive and violent in several severe cases, which creates chaos in society. Furthermore, some students cannot tolerate the burden and they end up with their lives. For instance, a study by the Asia Education Centre, has revealed that more than twenty percent of students attempt suicide, because of the academic pressure. So that, teachers should teach students according to their learning capacity, rather than putting pressure on them.

To conclude, as students are the future of the nation, they should be lived freely without any burden. The overall development of children can evolve them into better citizens.

Sample 5:

Pressure on educational establishments such as schools and universities is growing and students put on assiduous work when they are young. Although hard work instils determination and resilience in the youthful generation, I believe this perspective has a negative impact. Let us consider some positive and pessimistic sides of this topic.

The first thing that needs to be said is nowadays academic institutions influence soft and hard skills which lead to future careers. An important point is that hardworking inspires one to strive for excellence, because to secure a well-paid job and be considered a highly qualified individual, one needs to be dedicated in studies and gain valuable skills and knowledge. Moreover, the current generation of students is lazy and sleepy. Force by university pushes effort to keep moving forward and making progress in various aspects of life.

Secondly, it is undeniable that curriculum complication leads to perpetual tension during the tuition period which has a disadvantageous effect on psychology and physical condition. It should be noted that a stressful state before an exam affects assessment, moreover, these aspects can decrease motivation and resilience in the future. In addition, plenty of pressure takes up great quantities of free time, and as a result students and pupils cannot find hobbies and other interests besides homework and learning educational materials. For instance, they don't have the opportunity to realize other talents and possibilities. Furthermore, resting and relaxing is like a breath of fresh air for the brain and leisure makes sense.

The conclusion, there are both merits as well as demerits of expanding pressure at schools and universities. I believe that if the mental load on the scholar stabilizes and stands out in countless pastimes of studying it will motivate and equipe with proficiency and knowledge.

Sample 6:

In the modern world, school and university students suffer from a growing amount of pressure. As a result, they start working at an early age. Although students can earn more money if they commence working as early as possible, in my opinion, it should be viewed as a negative situation since students cannot acquire patience.

On the one hand, pressure at academic facilities can make students cope with difficulties. Students need to go through exams and activities under constant pressure. As a result, this hard experience enables students to acquire patience. For instance, many prime ministers finished university, and they come to work under pressure. I agree with this opinion since patience is a lifetime skill that is crucial once students start their careers.

On the other hand, according to some individuals, students can earn more money if they work without finishing school. In general, people can receive more financial resources if they work for a long period. For example, in Japan, a person can receive a salary according to the duration of the engagement, thus a person who has worked for a long duration can receive a higher salary than those who do not. However, I disagree with this idea since students can obtain more fortune if they make a leap to self-employment and start a new business.

To conclude, even though students can obtain more money because they can work longer than others who finish university, in my perspective, it can be argued that this situation is a negative development as students are unable to become patient via studying under pressure.

Sample 7:

These days, in most developed countries, students are increasingly challenged at educational institutions. I believe such a phenomenon is rather beneficial as it not only teaches youngsters to endure and thrive in life but also enhances their mental abilities, which helps to avoid age diseases such as Dementia and Alzheimer’s.

First and foremost, when kids are pushed to work hard at school, they learn to overcome adversity at a young age. As a result, they acquire fundamental life skills, which prove essential to achieving further educational challenges. For example, if school attendants are pushed when they are young, they develop inner strength and confidence, therefore they believe they can succeed at every challenge imposed. Consequently, when these individuals become adults, they already have a strong sense of purpose and thus they achieve their goals much easier than their peers.

Additionally, owing to the fact that they endured stressful circumstances at a young age, young professionals have far healthier brains, which is fundamental to avoiding mental illnesses when elderly. For instance, it has been proven that young professionals that graduated under pressure showed surprising signs of enhanced mental activity, which contributed to the development of healthier minds at an older age. Furthermore, scientific research showed that those who reportedly struggle at the academy had half the chances of acquiring traditional age diseases such as Dementia and Alzheimer's. In other words, younger minds that overcome stressful academic situations develop better neuronal interfaces which keep their minds healthier for longer.

To conclude, while some debate whether it is a positive or negative development whether pupils should be pushed to work harder when attending school, I strongly believe that it is most advantageous that they get pushed and encouraged to become their best self in an educational aspect. This is because they will not only build a prosperous life but also keep a healthier mental state throughout their lives.

Sample 8:

In a constantly-changing world today, students are under much more pressure from schoolwork since they are forced to be diligent in academics from an early age. In my opinion, it should be considered negative on account of several reasons below.

To begin with, I believe that putting increasing academic pressure on students can leave many detrimental implications for their physical well-being. In particular, many young children have to suffer from fatigue and health deterioration when they are pushed to spend most of their time studying at school and in extra classes on a daily basis. In other words, too much time is allocated to studying hard, which means that they are likely to lead a sedentary lifestyle without any chances to do physical activities regularly.

In addition, with a tight study schedule, young children and university students can be put at risk of mental health issues such as stress and depression which are the main culprits of the increasing suicide rate. This can be exemplified by the cases in some Asian countries such as Korea and China where studying is very pressured due to tough competitiveness with prestigious universities. This leads many students to make a desperate decision to end their own lives to escape from all pressure.

Some parents hold an argument that it is beneficial for children to form a study routine and work hard at school at a young age. To be more specific, they strongly argue that with serious efforts, their offspring can gain fruitful achievements in their future. Although I accept that studying hard is of vital importance to children’s future jobs, I still support the view that learning should be enjoyable, so children need to have a carefree and happy childhood. In fact, children are vulnerable, and too much pressure can make them obsessed and unmotivated in the learning process.

In conclusion, in light of the aforementioned reasons including adverse effects on physical and mental health as well as children’s inner will to learn new knowledge, I firmly hold a belief that this trend is overall a negative development.

Sample 1:

While some argue that the government should play a significant role in promoting and safeguarding public health, others contend that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices regarding their lifestyle. This essay will explore both perspectives, arguing in favour of the view that it is a personal choice and responsibility.

Those who advocate for the government's involvement in ensuring a healthy lifestyle argue that it is a matter of public welfare. They believe that the government has a duty to protect the health of its citizens by implementing policies and regulations that promote healthy practices. For instance, the government can enforce regulations on food labelling and advertising, impose taxes on unhealthy products, and provide subsidies for nutritious foods. By taking such measures, the government can create an environment that supports healthy choices and reduces the prevalence of unhealthy behaviours.

On the other hand, proponents of individual responsibility argue that personal choices and self-determination should dictate one's lifestyle. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to make choices regarding their health, as it is a matter of personal autonomy. They argue that individuals are better equipped to understand their own needs, preferences, and circumstances, and should be responsible for managing their own health. By promoting personal responsibility, individuals can be motivated to educate themselves, adopt healthier habits, and make informed decisions about their well-being.

In my opinion, it is ultimately the responsibility of individuals to prioritize and maintain a healthy lifestyle. While the government can provide support and resources through education, public campaigns, and access to healthcare services, it is important to preserve individual freedom and autonomy. Individuals should be empowered to make choices based on their unique circumstances, cultural backgrounds, and personal preferences.

To conclude, while some argue that the government should play a more active role in ensuring a healthy lifestyle for its citizens, I believe that personal choice and individual responsibility should take precedence. By allowing individuals to make their own decisions regarding their health and well-being, we promote personal freedom, autonomy, and accountability.

Sample 2:

According to some, a healthy lifestyle is a personal choice, and this should be determined by individuals. Others, however, believe that the government should ensure a healthy lifestyle for all citizens. This essay will discuss both these perspectives. Personally, I believe that a healthy lifestyle is a choice that should be made by each individual while the government of a country should guarantee proper healthcare services and facilities that promote public health.

On the one hand, if an individual has the determination to lead a healthy life, she would need little help from the state. A healthy lifestyle is a choice. The government can make sure better healthcare, exercise and entertainment facilities throughout the country but if someone does not develop the habit of leading a healthy life, the government can do very little about it. Interestingly, this is a choice we can make regardless of our social, educational and economic status. For instance, a rich man might live an unhealthy lifestyle while someone with very little earnings can decide to live a healthy lifestyle.

On the other hand, there is no denying that a government also has an important role to play to ensure a better lifestyle for its citizens. For instance, in countries where the government fails to ensure proper education, health care facilities, recreation and economic development, people usually follow an unhealthy lifestyle there. Some important laws and policies like mandatory vaccination, carbon emission, and drug control can determine the extent of people’s healthy lifestyles. Thus, it is true that government policy and initiatives help citizens to have a better lifestyle.

Considering both viewpoints, I would like to conclude that the healthy lifestyle of citizens in a country is a combination of individual choice and government initiatives. Thus, I feel that each person should choose a healthy lifestyle while the government of a country should ensure proper facilities to make it easier for citizens.

Sample 3:

With the increasing dependency on technology, demanding jobs and a busy lifestyle, people nowadays, tend to invest less time in maintaining a salubrious lifestyle. However, a person can bring about many changes in their lifestyle to lead a better and healthy life as it is a personal choice. The government, on top of that, has an equal role to play in making policies and laws to highlight important health issues to bring public attention.

On the one hand, people's yearning for a better lifestyle is a driving force in self-motivation and encouragement to lead a positive, active and healthy life. To substantiate this, if someone decides to lead a sedentary lifestyle, it becomes harder for her to stay focused on a healthy track. But, if they adopt a healthful lifestyle, it keeps them determined and dedicated to their fitness goals. Personal choices in daily life make a big difference in keeping us healthy regardless of our profession, economic condition and age. For example, people who decide to maintain personal hygiene and a balanced diet are 60% less prone to getting ill from common diseases than their counterparts who ignore basic hygiene.

On the other hand, the government can bring significant changes by implementing many action plans and promoting awareness campaigns for a healthy lifestyle. Local authorities may encourage many people to take up outdoor activities and sports by establishing and maintaining health and sports centres in the community. Through awareness programmes about salutary food and diet, they can change a great proportion of the community. Furthermore, lifestyle-related health campaigns could be promoted to shift people's interest in considering healthy lifestyle options. Schools in Japan, for instance, are funded by food and health authorities to encourage their pupils to participate in various physical activities such as sports and gymnastics. This has a significant contribution towards improving public health. 

To conclude, both the government and citizens should play a collaborative role in choosing, implementing and encouraging many healthier options to bring about a major improvement in public health and their lifestyles.

Sample 4:

It is often argued that the State should take the responsibility of ensuring a healthy lifestyle for its citizens. However, others believe that the ones lie on the person to lead a healthy, stress-free life. I believe that it is the joint responsibility of the individual and the government and over the course of my essay, I will explain my point of view.

On the other hand, it is true that each person is responsible for his own life choices. A healthy body is a healthy mind. So, it is our duty to eat healthily and lead an active life. Nobody will be able to change our lifestyle for the better if we ourselves are unwilling to adopt a healthy way of living. What one eats, how much one exercises, what one does to lead a healthy stress-free life is one's own concern. To illustrate, most textbooks teach us about balanced healthy diet in our science class. However, with time, most of this knowledge is put on the back burner when we indulge in eating fast food. Similarly, the statutory warnings like "Smoking kills", "Alcohol is injurious to health" are flashed during the screening of any such scene on television. However, that does not deter people from taking up these vices! Therefore, it is up to the individual to make healthy lifestyle choices to ensure longevity and wellbeing.

Having said this, it is also true that the government, being an administrative body, should take the responsibility of maintaining the well-being of the public for various reasons. Firstly, improving the health of the citizens eventually leads to a decrease in disease burden and healthcare-related expenditure. This money can be utilised by the State for other beneficial purposes like building infrastructure. For example, the NHS of the United Kingdom takes care of the country's health, and it would be advantageous if a part of the expenditure could be cut down thanks to a healthier society. Secondly, the government alone has the authority to take the fast food chains heavily and to curb the sale of liquor and tobacco. This will ensure decreased availability to the people and therefore improve the health of the public. Moreover, government-sponsored health awareness programmes can help to build a healthy future generation.

Sample 5:

Healthy lifestyles have emerged as one of the cornerstones supporting the upkeep and transformation of contemporary societies during the past ten years. While some believe that the government should use limited force to urge people to live healthy lifestyles. Others believe that it is the responsibility of each individual to curb their behaviours and adhere to these programs. Both points of view will be covered in this essay.

Government agencies that support the implementation of such programs include the ministry of public health. However, in order to create new plans and close gaps, it is crucial to measure the results. Governments must allow the necessary funds based on the outcomes obtained. Following such initiatives, for instance, will result in fewer patients, which will significantly lower the expenditure needed for medical care. The government's power to open and build health clubs in numerous places is another reason why those measures should be implemented. For instance, the government can offer healthy food recipes and workouts that can significantly alter people's lifestyles. These illustrations support the argument that the government should implement the policies.

On the other hand, individuals play a major role in adopting and sustaining a healthy lifestyle. Without their tenacity, all government initiatives would be unsuccessful. A person cannot take action if he is not convinced of its benefits. For instance, someone who is committed to adopting that lifestyle will find the time to do so throughout the day. For maintaining your physical fitness in just 15 minutes a day, there are now some online exercise videos. For his own benefit, he will adopt a healthy diet in order to achieve greater results. If he changes his eating habits, his health will significantly improve, and the number of ailments will decline.

In conclusion, it is clearly obvious that sustaining a healthy lifestyle is a shared responsibility of the government and the general public. My belief is that encouraging and enticing people to participate in such activities is absolutely necessary. Without the assistance of the government, such an engagement would be impossible.

Sample 6:

Some groups in society argue that governments should be in charge of ensuring that their citizens lead healthy lifestyles. While others support the viewpoint that this cannot be managed by any one individual. Both sides have virtues, in my opinion, but I believe that the government should be in charge of it, and this essay seeks to support my position.

On the other hand, depending on each person's willpower, leading a healthy life can help people regain their fitness. In reality, a growing body of studies has demonstrated that people can lose weight and balance if they engage in rigorous exercise and a restricted diet. For instance, after three months of living a balanced lifestyle, my weight, which was 64 kg, dropped to 52 kg. A healthy lifestyle might also lessen the risk of contracting diseases. Fast food consumption that is processed and seldom exercised are factors that may gradually increase the risk of obesity and other lifestyle-related diseases.

On the other hand, many people think that governments are in a good position to implement policies that promote healthy living. First and foremost, enhancing residents' health eventually lowers the incidence of sickness and costs associated with providing healthcare. In the long term, this may lead to a bigger share of the state budget going into other crucial areas like infrastructure and education. More importantly, life expectancy can increase as a result of living healthfully. Japan is one typical illustration. By consuming nutrient-dense, low-calorie meals like salmon instead of calorie-dense. And by exercising every day, the Japanese are known for maintaining an optimum lifestyle. Japan is recognized as having the longest life expectancy, at 80 years old, as a result.

In conclusion, while there are many solid grounds for individual responsibility. It is more logical to infer that the government should explore and implement some principles for a healthy life.

Sample 7:

People who lead healthy lifestyles live longer and are happier. Many people think that the government should oversee leading a healthy lifestyle. Some people, however, hold the opinion that leading a healthy lifestyle is a personal decision. Both of these viewpoints are covered in this essay.

On the one hand, there are several government policies that assist people in enhancing their health. The first is that the authorities can construct a variety of exercise equipment for use in the parks. Everyone is welcome to exercise there for free. Additionally, the government has the power to enact laws that forbid the smoking of cigarettes and other dangerous items in public places. For instance, there are various locations where smokers can smoke in public. To decrease usage, the company also raised the price of cigarettes.

However, each person must take responsibility for himself. First off, leading a healthy lifestyle makes it simple for people to get healthier. Since it depends only on the individual, everyone can be proactive about exercising at anytime and anywhere. Additionally, because people are diverse, there are variations in dietary preferences, culture, and customs. Each person must therefore find a strategy that works for them if they wish to improve their health. Not everyone can be treated by all of the government's policies.

I believe that in order to promote a healthy lifestyle, the government must be in charge of citizens' health. Additionally, people must improve their health on their own. Even though the government has created numerous community centres, doing exercise relies on each individual.

In conclusion, I feel that in order to live a healthy lifestyle, each individual must be mindful of their health. Even though the government should have some policies to enhance people's health.

Sample 8:

Opinions are divided on whether the responsibility for maintaining a healthy lifestyle lies with the government or individuals. In my view, both parties should have a significant role in promoting a healthier way of life.

Governments have a duty to ensure the well-being of their citizens. They can regulate the sale of unhealthy products like fast food, alcohol, and tobacco, leading to reduced access to harmful substances. For example, the UK's implementation of a sugar tax on soft drinks in 2018 resulted in decreased sugar consumption and increased sales of low-sugar alternatives. Additionally, government-led health awareness programs can effectively promote healthy habits and disease prevention. Japan's successful "Metabo" campaign raised awareness about metabolic syndrome and encouraged healthier lifestyle choices through education and outreach initiatives.

However, individual responsibility is also crucial. Individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices regarding their health and well-being. Empowering individuals to engage in regular physical activity, maintain a balanced diet, and abstain from harmful substances like tobacco and alcohol is essential. While recognising disparities in access to resources and opportunities, it's important to acknowledge that everyone possesses the ability to make choices that positively impact their health. The government can support individuals by providing information, resources, and initiatives that promote healthy choices, such as affordable gym memberships and nutrition education programs.

In conclusion, a balanced approach is needed. Governments should regulate unhealthy products and raise awareness, while individuals should take responsibility for their own health. By fostering collaboration between the two, we can create a society that values well-being and encourages healthy living.

Sample 1:

These days, many celebrities gain fame for their excessive wealth and lavish lifestyles rather than their work. While I agree that these celebrities have a negative influence on those who look up to them, I also believe that there are still many people who are well-known for their hard work and significant achievements.

Admittedly, there are a number of top stars who gain significant public attention simply because they are born into an extremely wealthy family or have a glamorous lifestyle. Paris Hilton is an excellent example of this. Her fame is largely due to her family’s real estate empire and her own extravagant lifestyle. By continuously showing off excessive wealth by posting pictures of her private jets, huge mansions, and A-list parties, she delivers a message that one’s worth is measured by material possessions. This idea might make impressionable young people think that they need to be very rich in order to be respected and admired by others. This relentless pursuit of wealth might cause some to take shortcuts, like engaging in illegal acts, just to become rich.

Despite some bad celebrity role models, I would argue that there are many people who are positive role models for young people. Michael Jordan is a powerful testament to the belief that anyone can become famous and successful as long as they put in enough effort and never give up. He is considered one of the greatest basketball players in history and his fame and recognition is thanks to years of training, failing, and trying again and again. Young people who look up to him will learn that failure is nothing more than a chance for them to try again; hence, they will be ready to face any obstacles and make every possible effort to make their dreams come true.

Although some celebrities’ fame is in large part due to their wealth and extravagance and they send a misleading message that wealth is the main indicator of one’s worth, I would contend that there are many public figures who make significant contributions in their chosen field and who are outstanding role models to those around them.

Sample 2:

These days, the fact that some celebrities are known for their money rather than for what they have achieved has become a hotly debated topic. In my opinion, I believe that these celebrities are bad influences on young people. Nevertheless, there are many other stars who are good examples to adolescents.

First of all, many celebrities are well-known for their glamorous lifestyle, which does not come from hard work. These celebrities may achieve fame and wealth from their parents, partners, families, or from being scandalous. This can mislead youngsters to believe that success can be achieved through unconventional means and give them a twisted perspective on life’s values. Take the Kardashians for example, they build an empire of reality shows by showing their quarrels, infidelities, and partying - which are not healthy behaviours that children should learn.

On the other hand, there are various self-made celebrities with admirable qualities and achievements that can influence young people in a positive way. These stars work their way up with talents, work ethics, and kind personalities. Such celebrities will inspire children to work hard and behave appropriately. For example, Keanu Reeves is an internationally famous star who is also widely known for his humble characteristic and good deeds. One of which is that he gave 70 percent of his earnings from the first “The Matrix” movie to leukemia studies. Another well-known star is Emma Watson, who became a millionaire after her role in the “Harry Potter” franchise. Despite becoming well-off at a young age, Emma never neglected her studies and even graduated from an Ivy-League school.

In conclusion, even though there are stars who exert negative influence on young people, there are several other celebrities who are exemplary to youngsters in the way they live their lives. It is crucial that children can differentiate between which celebrities to learn from.

Sample 3:

Celebrities have always been a subject of fascination for people around the world. However, in recent years, the focus on celebrities has shifted from their accomplishments to their glamorous lifestyle and wealth. This has raised concerns among many that it may set a negative example for young people. Due to several reasons, I will disagree with this view. 

Some celebrities are more famous for their wealth and glamour than their achievements. Many young people today aspire to be like these celebrities and try to emulate their lavish lifestyles. For example, young girls idolize famous models and actresses who flaunt their designer clothes, expensive jewelry, and luxurious vacations on social media. This creates unrealistic and unhealthy expectations among young people. 

However, it is not entirely fair to blame celebrities for setting a bad example for young people. Many celebrities have worked hard to achieve success, and their wealth and glamour are merely the byproducts of their achievements. For instance, athletes who have trained rigorously for years and have won medals and trophies deserve to enjoy the fruits of their labour. Similarly, successful entrepreneurs who have built successful businesses through their hard work and dedication should be able to enjoy their wealth.

In my opinion, the problem lies not with celebrities but with the way the media portrays them. The media often focuses on their glamorous lifestyle and wealth, rather than their achievements, to attract more viewers and readers. This has resulted in the perception that celebrities are famous only for their wealth and glamour. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the media to shift the focus back to the achievements of these celebrities and highlight the hard work and dedication that went into their success.

In conclusion, it may be true that a few celebrities are more famous for their assets and glamour than their achievements, which can set a negative example for young people. However, it is not the whole picture as most celebrities work hard to gain fame and success.

Sample 4:

It is true that most celebrities are known for their luxurious lifestyles than for their performance or talents these days. Many people think that this kind of attitude is not a good example for the young generation. To a certain extent, I would agree that this kind of behaviour would be a bad example for society, but there are other famous people are popular due to their outstanding accomplishment.

On the one hand, it is a fact that many famous people become popular due to their fancy lifestyle, instead of their outstanding achievement these days. Their acting talent might be standard or below average, but they are making sensation to the public by showing their wealth and glamorous lifestyles. One of the examples would be Kim Kardashian who is famous for her reality television program, whereas it mostly shows her luxurious mansion, party and shopaholic lifestyles and less of her acting. It is believed that the behaviour would be a negative influence for the young people as it teaches them about hedonistic lifestyle.

On the other hand, there are celebrities who are popular for their incredible acts or outstanding performance. These people have shown to the world that they have reached success due to strong determination and hard work, and the public always recognise them for their masterpiece of arts and great achievements. One of the examples would be the legendary English footballer, David Beckham. He was not only a good athlete but also became the model for some sports apparels. Although David Beckham sometimes had shown his glamorous lifestyle, he had also shown to the public that he was a good football player. He had informed in his biography that to achieve success, he had to work hard in his young age, as he had to practice in doing penalty kick for around 1000 kick per day consistently. These kinds of celebrities are worth being followed by the young generation.

In conclusion, many famous people are well known for their wealth and luxurious style, instead of their achievement and it would be a negative example for young people. To a certain point, I would disagree with this opinion, since there are other celebrities who are famous due to their great talent and performance. In my opinion, I think the public should be more selective in choosing their role models, not just in front of the camera, but we should also see from their personal life as well.

Sample 5:

Fame and fortune are largely dependent on the hard work, persistence, luck and creativity displayed by individuals of a society. These qualities often make them very famous and popular so that the whole nation becomes anxious and curious just to get their glimpse or an autograph. Few people believe that people are popular due to their glamour and rich lifestyle. They claim that youngsters should not follow their footprint because they may lead them astray and I don’t agree fully with this proclamation. This essay will analyse the merits and demerits of idealising celebrities before presenting a conclusion.

Famous people such as movie or sports stars can be role models for the young people of a society. Idealising and treating them as their idol can help them to achieve their required goal in life. Following their footprints can result in exploring their own talent which can further showcase marvels and brilliance. Their creativity, innovation and display of their skills and abilities inspire adolescents to bring change in their life for good. For instance, legendary Amir Khan, the famous Bollywood celebrity, is known for his inspirational and creative movies but not for his wealth or attractive personality. Adolescents copying his qualities and attributes have promoted strong moral and ethical values in a society.

On the contrary, few people believe that following superstars and famous people displaying negativity can mislead young people of our society. Proponents of this viewpoint believe that inspiring from their negative roles and displaying the same act at home or in streets can have a severe impact on the society. Moreover, celebrities are often found in smoking advertisements, charged with drugs and other criminal activities, youth following their path can result in the destruction of ethical values of a society. For instance, Sanjay Dutt, Bollywood Actor is well known for his money and roles as a villain, his terrorist acts in different movies have given rise to violence and crime in streets of Mumbai, all these were committed by adolescents for thrill and adventure.

To recapitulate, the aforementioned provides plausible arguments in favour of both views. There is no doubt that famous people have their influence, as youth is not mature and in the growing phase of their life. However, one should not criticise celebrities as it depends on the young people how they perceive and take it forward.

Sample 6:

It is certainly true that today more TV and movie personalities are better known for their glamorous look and wealth rather than their accomplishments. This will probably have a negative impact on gullible young individuals but not for the critically thinking teenagers.

The primary reason to agree with this statement is that minors are gullible. They are easily taken into those who they watch on television, movie or even in advertisements. For instance, Philippine presidential sister and TV and movie superstar, Ms. Kris Aquino is the most admired especially for the Filipino adolescents, and at the same time most dislike celebrity in the country. She came from a very powerful political family, but she uses her wealth for the sake of glamour through liposuction and spending too much for expensive branded products such as Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Hermes. This will perhaps affect believing younger people in a negative way because she is actually showing that it is alright to spend too much money for manipulating God-given body and for unnecessary costly things.

On the other hand, not all young ones are credulous; most of them are critical thinkers. So, they are wise enough not to look just at the allurement and richness of TV and commercial stars but to focus on their notable achievements. For example, the international boxer figure, Emmanuel "Manny" Pacquiao who was then a typical Filipino poor man and became an extremely wealthy boxing man because of his undeniably perseverance and dedication. These are the qualities some youths in the Philippines are trying to emulate

In conclusion, I think that in my country, there are more discerning younger people than unwise ones. So, they are not easily affected by just the celebrities' beautiful aura and wealth. They know which one to be emulated and that is the figure's good qualities.

Sample 7:

Mass media enabled inviting fame to those who have a commanding presence and dominant influence, best of whom are celebrities. People follow their leads as their graceful lives set bars for glory, far less than their own achievements. As this needs imperative attention, I think it shall take a while for this concern to be addressed.

Marked by their elusive beauty, celebrities hail in all forms of media; thus, people only see their outer sophistication. Nonetheless, their achievements are commonly left unnoticed. This is mainly due to idolatry where beauty is considered an investment. Hence, in today's era, a person needs someone to look up to and is perfect enough to stand out among the rest. This notion is even exacerbated by the media, to which they preserve one's outer elements as priorities.  For instance, adverts hire celebrities whose commanding influence hypnotizes others to follow. This is quite hard to control since creativity is companies' best shot.

Notwithstanding the attention that artists' glamour and richness are getting, this creates a notion to people's mind to achieve something rather than to stay mediocre and plebeian. However, the point of losing one’s sight towards achievements is getting into trouble. This creates a bad impact on our society since people no longer feel the hunger to do the best in their own fields; instead, they want to become gorgeous, rather than a winner, because it is perceived as a trend way more than the other.

By and large, I think it has both positive and negative remarks. Although one is given more importance than the other, still, people consider it a point of reference for standards. The drawbacks may outweigh the good points, I believe that general trends be acknowledged on their own.

Sample 8:

It is an unfortunate reality of today's world that celebrities are cherished and celebrated, not for their achievements, but merely for their fame and wealth. Youth, in particular, views such worldly possessions of celebrities as the highest mark of human achievement. No wonder this trend has devastating effects on the younger generation. To prove this, one has to analyze how the youth perceive celebrities' success in general and the fact that many amongst them don't pose the right kind of image for the youth to look up to.

Firstly, very few young people realise that all the fame and glory that the celebrities get to enjoy is never achieved overnight, rather it is all blood, sweat and tears. It takes years and years of struggle to get to that point, which many youngsters choose not to go through, rather, they look for shortcuts towards success. Thus, as a result, they are overcome with procrastination and laziness, which is a direct consequence of idealising the materialistic possessions of their ideals.

Secondly, one should consider the fact that a number of superstars in the entertainment business are infamous who should not be looked up to in any way. For instance, musicians who use extremely obscure lyrical themes in their music, or the actors working in biographical movies dedicated to serial killers etc. These instances show that when the youth venerate such forms of entertainment, they are somehow led to believe that they can also become as famous and successful merely by imitating their so-called ideals. Hence, the negative influence of such a trend is obvious.

Having analysed how glorifying rich people, not for their hard-earned achievements, but merely for their worldly possessions, can affect youth's perception of success, it is proven that this tendency does set a bad example. It is highly recommended that youth should be encouraged to realise that a man's worth should not be judged by his possessions, rather by the journey he goes through to achieve those possessions.

Sample 9:

It is believed by some that these days, many people have acquired their fame and popularity by showing people that they are leading a glamourous and wealthy life rather than working hard to achieve amazing feats in their chosen field. While I agree that these people set a bad example to the young, I believe that there are still others who are well-known for their talents and hard work and are a source of inspiration for the next generations.

On the one hand, many people do achieve fame without working for it. Some of them were born to a wealthy family, and others got married to a rich spouse or even worse, some even deliberately caused scandals to be famous. Ngoc Trinh, a famous Vietnamese model, is a prime example. She has gained her popularity among the young mostly due to her shocking and provocative photos and her videos showing her impulsive buying habits with the latest, often most expensive luxury items on the market. Her lifestyle can be misleading because it conveys a message to youngsters that success is easy, and that beauty is more important than hard work and good characteristics.

On the other hand, there are many celebrities whose accomplishments make them excellent role models for young people. Many actors, actress, sports stars and musicians become world-famous idols because they have persevered and applied themselves to harness and sharpen their skills and abilities. They demonstrate great effort, determination, persistence, and ambition, which are required for those who want to make a name for themselves in their chosen field. For example, the international football star Cristiano Ronaldo is well-known for his self-discipline which is the key factor that leads him to his peak performance in every match. This kind of self-made celebrity can inspire the young to be diligent and persistent to achieve their dreams and be successful in life.

In conclusion, while there are people being famous for the wrong reasons and they can have a negative impact on younger generations, I believe that there are other celebrities out there who are living examples of hard work and determination, and they are great role models for young people to look up to.

Sample 10:

It is a well-known fact that most celebrities and TV personalities are better known for their luxurious lifestyles than their performances or accomplishments. Consequently, their extravagant lifestyle instigates such attitudes in the youth, and I believe it negatively impacts youngsters. The negative impacts will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs

Nowadays, there are several famous celebrities and actors who are extremely popular due to their extravagant lifestyle, instead of their acting skills or performances. Such celebrities always manage to make it to the headlines by creating sensational acts either in films or in real life. Therefore, these kinds of celebrities have a negative influence on young people because instead of influencing people with their achievements and accomplishments, they try to manipulate youngsters by their wealth and luxurious lifestyle.

Furthermore, there are some famous superstars in the entertainment industry whose acting skills might be average. Still, they always manage to stay in the headlines by showing off their wealthy, and glamorous lifestyles. Their behaviour and attitude always have an adverse influence on teenagers. For example, Kylie Jenner, who is famous for her reality show, usually shows off her palatial mansion, high-profile parties, and opulent lifestyles instead of merely acting. Thus, it is possible that the young people will easily get influenced by her behaviour and her rich lifestyle, which would have a negative effect on them.

Though there are a few actors in the entertainment industry who portray positive acts on screen and are extremely talented, there are a lot many others who spoil young minds.

In a nutshell, we can reiterate that all TV personalities have positive and negative impacts on people. But the difference lies in the influence they have on the people, either positively or negatively. Thus, in my opinion, people should be relatively selective in choosing their ideal role models.

Sample 1:

The usage of social networking websites and applications like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok etc. has dramatically increased recently with the advancement of technology. Although it has some detrimental effects on society, its positive side has transformed the world. I believe this technology has a significant contribution in bringing people closer around the globe and also acts as a source of cheap and efficient means for communication and staying connected.

It is true that with the increasing use of social networking websites, some people have become disjointed and fragmented. Youngsters are more receptive to this change as they like to spend most of their time on these sites. This has led to many negative consequences for their physical and psychological health. Moreover, families are greatly affected by this, and their social bonding is no longer present in contemporary days.

Nevertheless, social networking sites play a pivotal role in mitigating the communication gap not only in the immediate social circle but also with friends and families in remote areas. Furthermore, many social groups exist on such sites which help people find people of the same interests and attitudes without confiding them to only geographical boundaries. It has recently been seen that many injustices and social issues were shared on social networking sites, and that made an overall huge impact. That has brought justice to the victims in several instances. Moreover, social networking sites are a common ground for mass people to share their updates, views and other details. Thus, this has created a world without any boundaries.

To conclude, I would like to say that people have become more social and interactive through the use of social networking sites. It gives people a sense of freedom to talk around the world without worrying about the huge cost. It is expected that we would try to mitigate its negative sides and reap the maximum benefits of staying connected.

Sample 2:

The increasing popularity of social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter has sparked a heated debate on whether these platforms have had a positive or negative impact on individuals and society. While these sites have made communication cheaper and more accessible, I firmly believe that their negative effects on society and the community are enormous.

On the one hand, social networking websites have enabled people to communicate and stay connected with others online. These platforms offer an efficient way for individuals to share information, ideas, and experiences with a wide audience. For example, social media platforms have played a vital role in some countries to fight government corruption, as protesters used Twitter and Facebook to coordinate their activities and share their messages with the world.

On the other hand, social networking sites have a huge negative impact on society and the community. First, they promote a culture of superficiality and narcissism, where people are more concerned about their online image and popularity than their real-life relationships and experiences. As a result, many individuals become addicted to social media, spending countless hours scrolling through their feeds and neglecting their responsibilities and duties. Second, social media platforms have become a breeding ground for fake news, hate speech, and cyberbullying, which have a devastating impact on society and democracy. For instance, the spread of fake news and misinformation on Facebook has been blamed for influencing the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential Election.

In conclusion, while social networking sites have made communication cheaper and more accessible, their negative effects on society and the community are enormous. It is essential that we recognize and address these issues to create a more healthy, productive, and democratic society.

Sample 3:

A large group of people believe that social networking websites and apps like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram have largely a detrimental impact on individuals, society, and local communities. While I believe that these sites have some benefits for individuals, I agree that they have mostly negative impacts on local communities or societies as a whole. This essay explains my position.

Social media has brought people from different countries together and enabled them to connect and communicate in an unprecedented way. Facebook's social groups offer individuals the opportunity to interact with like-minded people and participate in discussions on topics of interest while other apps allow them to chat or talk with others without spending extra money. These are clear advantages that online social media has brought to individuals.

However, the effect of Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites on societies and local communities is highly negative. Due to their influence, people are choosing to engage more online instead of participating in their local communities. As a result, local communities are no longer forming the strong, corroborating relationships that we used to have in the past. Society, as a whole, is becoming increasingly fragmented and disconnected as people spend more time online with people they have never met and are unlikely to meet in the future.

To conclude, while social networking sites have brought individuals closer together, they have not had the same effect on society or local communities. Local communities should take steps to involve their members in local activities to promote the future of community life. Social media can continue to bring individuals together, but it is important to recognize its limitations when it comes to strengthening local communities.

Sample 4:

Thanks to the technological advancements of our era, social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram have been in existence for a considerable period. However, many individuals believe that these platforms have a negative impact on society and individuals. Personally, I strongly oppose this viewpoint, and I’ll outline my key arguments below.

Firstly, people nowadays can communicate more easily and instantly through social media. Moreover, they can maintain relationships and form additional ones regardless of physical distance. For example, individuals can share photos instantly with family members living in different parts of the world, leading to the preservation of close-knit family ties. Moreover, these platforms enable people to leverage a substantial user base, thus facilitating business engagement with customers. Many individuals are inclined to trust products endorsed by influencers on social media more than television advertisements, resulting in enhanced authenticity and reliability. Consequently, businesses can access a broader consumer base and increase brand awareness.

In conclusion, although social media may have negative impacts on society and individuals, the positive effects outweigh the negative ones. Social media serves as an effective platform for marketing expansion and enhanced communication.

Sample 5:

With the development of new technologies, the popularity of social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, etc., has skyrocketed. Despite its many negative effects on society, its potential benefits should not be overlooked. I firmly bolster with the former viewpoint my preference and other side is justified further. 

To begin with, social networking sites play a crucial role in bridging the gap in communication between people, both locally and with far-flung loved ones. In addition, these platforms typically host numerous social groups that enable users to locate others who share their interests and worldview regardless of physical proximity. In recent years, we've witnessed how sharing stories of injustice and social issues on social media has had a significant impact on authority and resulted in victims receiving justice. Internet social networks have become a widespread medium for people to disseminate and discuss news, ideas, and other information.

However, as social networking sites have become more commonplace, it has been observed that people have become disjointed and fragmented. The younger generation is more open to this shift, and they prefer to devote the majority of their time to these platforms. Their mental and physical health have suffered as a direct result of this. Furthermore, this has a significant impact on families, whose once-robust social bonds have all but vanished in the modern era. Individuals are becoming reliant on these platforms, leading to a decline in their interpersonal skills.

In a nutshell, the use of social networking sites has made people more sociable and interactive. The huge cost previously incurred for international calls is eliminated, giving people the confidence to talk to anyone, anywhere in the world. However, as a result of their hectic schedules, most people prefer electronic communication to face-to-face encounters, which increases the distance between them.

Sample 6:

There are those who believe that social media is bad for people and society as a whole. Since people are vulnerable to developing an unhealthy addiction and social media can lead to schisms in society, I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint.

The most noticeable impact of social media is on users' psychological well-being. The small doses of dopamine that come from scrolling through one's feed, feeling outraged at posts, receiving likes, and making positive or negative comments have become addictive for the vast majority of social media users. While there are many ways to find fulfilment, none of them are as healthy as actually accomplishing something worthwhile in the real world. Some people would rather hide away in a virtual world where the risks are much lower, and the interactions are always one-sided.

On top of that, the negative effects of social media are widely recognised. Facebook is full of isolated communities that foster antisocial behaviour. Conspiracy theories, for instance, are a common subject of online discussion and speculation. Isolation from the rest of society is a gradual process that can manifest itself in real-world events like the January 6 insurrection and the Occupy Wall Street movement. These events have the appearance of protests, but the ideas being advocated are usually too radical to result in reform that can be defended or implemented pragmatically.

To recapitulate, for the average person and for society as a whole, social media has far more negative effects than positive ones. Governments' aversion to regulation means that users should stop bothering with these services.

Sample 7:

There are countless ways in which humankind benefits from the progress of technology. Some people believe it leads to a surge in anarchy in society. However, a few others are of the viewpoint that it gives people a global stage on which to be seen. In this respect, I concur with the claim that technological advances in social media provide numerous advantages for young people.

It's undeniable that the advancements in technology provide us with a wide stage on which to perform. A person can expand their business and network by connecting with people all over the world. For instance, people today use these platforms to set up shop online, where they can describe their wares, receive orders for them, and collect payment, all without ever having to physically interact with a single customer.in addition to this, in the modern era, people can always find the most recent news on these sites. During the recent covid-19 pandemic, for example, people were able to access information from a variety of sources, including those on the other side of the world, in a matter of seconds. 

However, there are those who worry about the potential downsides to people's personal and social lives brought on by this progress. To cite just one example, people become "mouse potatoes," causing children to lose focus on their schoolwork and causing adults to waste a lot of time. Furthermore, as people spend more time on these sites, they become more introverted and, paradoxically, more mature in their thinking, as obscene content is readily available even to those with immature minds.

To sum up, there are those who believe that these sites are harmful to individuals and communities. However, I'm inclined to argue that many advantages exist. We need to regulate these platforms more strictly.

Sample 8:

Experts are of the viewpoint that Facebook and other social media websites have far-reaching, negative effects on both individuals and communities. I completely bolster such a viewpoint. My preference and the other side are justified in the ensuing paragraphs.

The first and foremost reason for my inclination is that the primary reason I feel this way is that many young people today would rather spend their time on Facebook or another international social networking site than out in their neighbourhoods making friends and acquaintances. In addition to this, people are spending more time online with people they have never met in person and are unlikely to meet in the future, further fracturing and destabilising society as a whole.

On the other hand, there is no denying the positive effects that online media has had on people personally. First, thanks to the rise of social networking sites like Facebook, people from all over the world can connect with one another in a way that was previously impossible. Facebook's social groups also provide users with an opportunity to connect with and learn from others who share similar interests. For instance, if parents send their children to study abroad can see their children through WhatsApp video calls, facetime and google meets. As a result of such social networking sites one can connect to their closed ones anywhere in the entire world.

To conclude, while social networking sites have undoubtedly brought people closer together, they have not had the same effect on larger institutions or neighbourhoods. Communities can do more to foster future community life by encouraging residents to participate in local activities.

Sample 9:

Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on individual people as well as society and local communities. However, while I believe that such sites are mainly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on local communities.

With regards to individuals, the impact that online social media has had on each individual person has clear advantages. Firstly, people from different countries are brought together through such sites as Facebook whereas before the development of technology and social networking sites, people rarely had the chance to meet or communicate with anyone outside of their immediate circle or community. Secondly, Facebook also has social groups which offer individuals a chance to meet and participate in discussions with people who share common interests.

On the other hand, the effect that Facebook and other social networking sites have had on societies and local communities can only be seen as negative. Rather than individual people taking part in their local community, they are instead choosing to take more interest in people online. Consequently, the people within local communities are no longer forming close or supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is becoming increasingly disjointed and fragmented as people spend more time online with people they have never met face to face and who they are unlikely to ever meet in the future.

To conclude, although social networking sites have brought individuals closer together, they have not had the same effect on society or local communities. Local communities should do more to try and involve local people in local activities in order to promote the future of community life.

Sample 10:

Many today argue that social media has an overall negative impact on both the average person and society more generally. I am in complete agreement with this opinion as individuals are likely to suffer from an unhealthy addiction and social media can cause fractures in society.

The most obvious effect of social media is on the mental health of individual users. Most people on social media have become to varying degrees addicted to the small dopamine bursts that come from scrolling through their feed, feeling outraged at posts, receiving likes, and making positive or negative comments. Each person is likely to gain satisfaction through a different route, but all these self-esteem boosts are unhealthy relative to achieving something in the real world. In some cases, individuals retreat from the real world in favor of a virtual one where the stakes are considerably lower, and interactions are safely one-sided.

Additionally, the drawbacks of social media are evident throughout society. There are numerous small groups and communities on Facebook that encourage anti-social impulses. For instance, many people post and read about conspiracy theories online on a daily basis. Over time, these individuals begin to feel isolated from mainstream society and the effects of this can appear during real-world events such as the January 6 insurrection and the Occupy Wall Street movement. Although these actions can be interpreted as protests, the viewpoints being expressed are often too extreme to lead to defensible and pragmatic reform.

In conclusion, social media is an overwhelming negative for both normal citizens and the entirety of society. Since governments are averse to regulation, it is important for individuals to abandon these platforms.

Sample 1:

Traffic jams are one of the major issues that affect the standard of living in urban areas. This essay will identify the causes of this problem and suggest practical solutions accordingly.

Traffic jams can be attributed to two main issues: large volume of vehicles and poor quality of infrastructure. First, the population is generally very dense in metropolitan areas, which means the number of traffic participants is also very high, leading to traffic congestion during rush hours. This is especially true in developing countries where the public transport system is underdeveloped and the majority of dwellers use private vehicles like cars, motorbikes… The second cause of traffic jams may lie in the quality of infrastructure. In some countries, roads are degraded with a lot of potholes due to the lack of maintenance. This, combined with the lack of traffic facilities such as traffic signals, road markings, warning signs… will result in traffic accidents and consequently traffic jams.

To solve these problems, the government can issue a number of policies to reduce the volume of vehicles and improve the quality of infrastructure. Counter-urbanization policies encouraging people to resettle in rural areas will help reduce the number of traffic participants and thus the likelihood of traffic jams. In addition, the government should encourage the use of public transport such as metro, bus, tram. This could be achieved by introducing concession fares for public transport and a car tax. In addition, the government should continuously improve the quality of infrastructure by conducting regular road maintenance and building modern facilities such as highways, overpasses, underpasses to ease the pressure on the roads.

In conclusion, traffic congestion is an urban issue that largely stems from the high volume of vehicles on the road and the low quality of infrastructure. To address these issues, there are a number of measures that the government can take, such as counter-urbanizing, promoting the use of public transport, maintaining roads regularly and upgrading transport facilities.

Sample 2:

Traffic congestion has increasingly plagued major cities worldwide. This issue arises due to several factors, and it necessitates effective measures to alleviate it. Several factors contribute to the significant, sudden increase in traffic congestion in big cities.

Primarily, the problem stems from the significant, sudden increase in the urban population. Over the past decades, there has been a trend of people migrating from rural to urban areas in search of employment opportunities, resulting in an overwhelming population for the existing transport infrastructure to handle. Consequently, traffic congestion has become a prevalent issue.

Secondly, inadequate development of the public transport system in many cities exacerbates the problem. Insufficient public transportation options compel commuters traveling significant distances to work to rely heavily on private vehicles, further congesting urban roads with numerous cars and motorcycles.

However, there are viable solutions that governments could implement to address this issue. The primary solution involves relocating industrial parks and businesses to rural areas, thereby creating more employment opportunities for residents there. This initiative could incentivize urban workers to return to their hometowns, consequently reducing overpopulation in urban areas and mitigating traffic congestion.

Another measure entails enhancing the public transport system and imposing higher taxes on private vehicles. These actions aim to encourage more individuals to utilize buses, trams, or subways, while discouraging the use of private vehicles. This shift would alleviate the burden on transport infrastructure and contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

In conclusion, traffic congestion in major cities arises from the influx of people from rural areas and inadequate development of transport infrastructure. However, governments can mitigate this problem by allocating more resources to rural areas and promoting the use of public transport.

Sample 3:

It is undoubtedly the case that urban areas around the world increasingly suffer from traffic congestion. In this essay, I will examine the reasons for this trend and suggest some practical policies the authorities could implement to reduce the level of traffic in our cities.
The first step is to understand why traffic has increased in towns and cities. Broadly speaking, there are three main reasons for this. One is that cars have become more affordable for the average consumer, and they are no longer a luxury item, but something that most families expect to own. A second reason is that public transport has become increasingly unreliable in recent years, not least because many bus and train services have been reduced because of the difficulty in funding them. The third reason is that society has, in general, become more mobile and this means more people are prepared to commute to work by car than they were before.

The biggest causes of traffic jam lack of proper road and bridges in cities. If there is an additional way for buses and large trucks in cities, traffic jams will reduce in cities.

There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes. However, one option has to be to improve the reliability of public transport to encourage people to take the bus or the train rather than get in the car. It would also be possible to discourage people from driving to work by introducing special tariffs for using the roads, especially during peak periods.
In conclusion, there are a variety of different factors that have led to rising levels of traffic in urban areas. While it may not be possible to find a complete solution, but actions should probably involve encouraging more use of public transports. Furthermore, taxes on private cars should be increased and eco-friendly transportation like bicycles should be promoted.

Sample 4:

It is a fact that traffic congestion has become a serious problem for many cities and towns. More and more people get stressed with this situation, as they have to spend hours after hours in the street and lose their productivity and valuable time. The following essay will discuss the cause of the issue and some of the solutions that can be taken into account.

For a number of reasons, traffic has become the main problem of many cities and towns all over the world. Firstly, as the population growth in many metropolis cities such as Shanghai, New York, Dhaka and Bangkok has increased rapidly in the past recent years, it means that there are more cars in the city. Secondly, in some cities, such as in Jakarta or Manila, public transportation facilities are poorly managed therefore the people choose to drive their own vehicles. Lastly, in many countries such as Indonesia or China, the economic development is not widely spread, and a result a lot of people from rural areas move to cities which would create traffic related problems. The number of commuters in many cities has increased dramatically but in proportion, the total number of roads remained almost same as it was in the past. Many people are buying private cars, and it is not unusual that many families own more than one car. These are two reasons for the poor traffic management system in many cities which cause unmanageable traffic jam nowadays.  

However, there are several things that the government could do to reduce the problem. The state government should provide decent, safe and clean public transportation facilities, therefore more people would use public transport, instead of driving their own private vehicles. And then the government should develop new industrial and commercial areas outside of the city. It is hoped that some people would move to these new areas and would reduce the density problem. The government could provide some bicycle lane, as it brings a lot of benefit for the people and the city itself. Bicycles as the primary means of communication could reduce traffic. It is also safer for the environment and has positive effects on the rider’s health. The roads and highways should be expanded, and new roads should be introduced. Severe punishment should be imposed for violating traffic rules and restrictions should be implemented in private car ownership. Finally, an improved traffic system should be introduced, and unfit cars and vehicles should be removed from the streets.

In conclusion, cities and towns all over the world are facing serious traffic problems these days. It is mainly due to the population growth, density and poor public transportation facilities. But there are several things that the government could do to address the problem, such as improving the public transports, developing new areas and persuade its resident in using bicycles.

Sample 5:

In today's world, traffic congestion is an extremely difficult problem for commuters around the globe. A 10 minute office to home ride had become a pathetic 40 minutes or even longer ride, spending one's valuable time on roads. This essay will explore some of the causes and recommended practices to reduce this issue.

The possible sources for increased traffic could be from several factors. Firstly, I consider migration of people from urban areas to cities in search of making a living as one of the primary reasons. This, in turn, leads to an increased number of vehicles on the road. Based on a recent study conducted by the Transportation Department of London, there is a 20% surge in volume of car sale in the United Kingdom each year over the last decade. Secondly, failing to adhere to traffic rules is another factor contributing to the waiting time due to traffic.

The government and public should be pragmatic about the actions that will solve this issue. The government should encourage using public transport instead of personal vehicles because in my country one will hardly find a co-passenger in a car other than the driver. In addition, the traffic control department should implement stringent traffic rules, for instance, diverting traffic in peak hours on a particular avenue.

In summary, a rapid rise in the number of car users is one of a major reason for increasingly pathetic traffic congestion. The government and public should cooperate to reduce the number of vehicles by using public transport.

Sample 6:

It is well known that traffic congestion has become a common problem around the world. In many cities, traffic jams substantially affect their citizens and their daily lives. This essay will examine the reasons why this problem occurred and potential solutions to overcome it.

Road congestion, which has been experienced in many cities, happened due to two main factors, the vehicle volume increase rate outweighs the road development rate and people's tendency to purchase their own vehicles. Firstly, road construction may require a longer duration than producing vehicles. A toll road construction in urban areas, for instance, demands the government to clear up the space first by destroying specific housing areas before building the toll road. On the other hand, personal vehicles, which are more convenient for most citizens, are getting cheaper over time. As a result, people prefer to buy their own vehicles rather than using public transportation. For example, in Indonesia, the cheapest car in 2010 was around two hundred million rupiah while the cheapest car in 2024 is around a hundred million rupiah.

The government plays a pivotal role in addressing this phenomenon. Public transport master plan and vehicle pricing strategy, which are governed by the national authorities, may be suitable solutions to solve this problem. The authorities should consider improving public transportation, such as buses, MRT, and LRT, in order to attract people to use them. For example, additional terminals can be constructed around business districts so that many offices can be easily accessed using public transport. As a next step, the institutions can establish a regulation to increase the price of personal vehicles. Singapore, which rarely experiences traffic jams, already implemented it resulting in a decrease in people's tendency to buy a private car.

In conclusion, the rapid growth of vehicle volume and cheaper vehicle options available in the market are two key factors why road congestion happens in many places. In order to solve this problem, the government's involvement is crucial in improving public transportation quality and establishing a regulation to make personal vehicles more expensive.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, in some regions of the world, traffic jam is a growing problem. It seems to me that not only do crowded streets waste our time but also steps should be taken to address this dilemma. This issue will be discussed, in this essay.

To begin with, a majority of eminent scientists strongly believe that congestion increases some imminent perils such as chronic diseases. Moreover, children and adolescents who live in bustling streets suffer from high stress. In some cases, employees would rather apply for occupations which are near their houses. Furthermore, some investigations from Tehran university have shown that the proportion of private cars has increased recently and consequently, we encounter a lack of some crucial energies like gas and oil. For example, in Iran, air pollution has risen rapidly and besides it serves as a barrier to living in this town.

However, there are a number of implications in this specific situation and governments should feel an obligation to them. Bicycles perform a significant role in our social and individual status. We should press a law in which our policies change. For instance, some organizations tackle this challenge with eco-friendly schedules. In Shiraz, engineers persevered to build new roads and in fact, it made a huge contribution to decreasing traffic. Nevertheless, in some parts of overcrowded places, trains are added to alleviate this predicament.

To sum up, in our sophisticated life, every year manufacturers produce new vehicles, therefore politicians should provide the required infrastructure and handle them perfectly.

Sample 8:

Nowadays, the most common problem in the world's major cities is Traffic congestion. The main reasons for this are a large number of private cars ownership and inadequate public transportation. Let us talk about it in this essay.

Firstly, the most common reason for traffic congestion is a lot of people tend to use cars for their daily activities rather than using public transportation. This is reasonable because in some countries, a car can cost as cheap as ten thousand dollars. Furthermore, when a lot of automobiles occupied the road spaces, it will create a traffic jam. Although placing additional lanes will not solve the problems, on the contrary, it will generate more bottlenecks. This condition will get worse if the public transportation services are poor. For example, Jakarta of Indonesian capital city. Nearly eighty per cent of the citizens use private vehicles as their daily mode of transportation. Right now, Jakarta becomes the most congested city in Indonesia.

To solve the problems, The Government should improve public transportation quality as comfortable as using private vehicles. In addition to the quality, public transportation capacities should be increased by building a busway line. The Bus Rapid Transit will operate as a feeder for the MRT line and serve downtown areas. As for rural areas, a Metro line must be built to catch the demand from hinterlands. Another simple solution is to encourage people to walk and bicycle by providing good pedestrian ways and bike lanes. For example, Japan Government prohibit cars and motorcycles to operate in the morning rush and increase vehicles tax to reduce cars ownership.

To conclude, the main cause of traffic congestion in the world's major cities is the number of private cars ownership increase rapidly meanwhile road and Metro development is lagging behind. A simple solution is encouraging people to walk and building more public transportation services.

Sample 9:

Traffic congestion is an enormous issue for big urban cities in the whole world and it is directly affecting all individuals who are living in these places. Even though this problem has a big magnitude, but still there are a few affordable solutions, like an improvement in the main road's infrastructure system and the introduction of more public transport to the public. The essay will further discuss both facets of a proposal with appropriate examples and reach a logical conclusion.

To begin with, the most effective solution is an amelioration of roads and highways in big cities that can definitely help to mitigate the problem. Although there are roads in every city, making more tunnels and flyovers would reduce the traffic jams because people start using these facilities without hassles. For example, in Delhi the government solved 50% of the complication by constructing more roads and tunnels in the city.

Additionally, there is one more significant solution available is providing a flexible public transportation system to the community. However, people are using their own transportation because some time there is no public transit available for them that compel them to buy their own vehicle, if the authority should make the public transit flexible and affordable for all of them then people would stop using private vehicles which could directly reduce the congestions. For instance, in Mumbai the council runs a more frequent service in the morning or evening, which has a trivial impact on the travel amount of the city.

In conclusion, unavailability of public transport and roads are the primary cause of this horrific trouble, so enhancement of these sectors could alleviate the issues. The government should spend more money in these areas, so people would not suffer more.

Sample 10:

The disparity between the urban and the rural is a major problem even in developed countries. In a significant topic of large city traffic congestion globally. This essay will explain the major reason for this issue and provide some solutions.

The main cause of traffic congestion is the rising population of the main city which increases with job opportunities. For instance, in Bangkok, major companies are based in the city and there are very few companies that launch in rural areas, thus more and more people decide to relocate to urban areas. As a result, a significant number of people are using personal vehicles. One solution could be for the government to provide companion tax concessions to support businesses in rural areas.

In addition, the city plan is structured incorrectly and has not developed over time. For example, developing countries are stuck in urban development problems because city planning in the past was inflexible and unable to develop further. To solve this problem, the government should contribute more to urban expansion to rural areas, such as promoting affordable home purchases reasonably or developing basic facilities.

Moreover, public transport does not regulate the whole country. For Instance, in developing countries, public transport systems are still being built. Consequently, some roads were closed to facilitate construction. One solution could be for the government to set a timeline for construction.

In conclusion, traffic congestion is connected to prosperity in urban, city planning, and public transport systems. Finally, it is important to encourage the government to introduce policies that promote urbanization and accelerate the development of the basic system in the country.

Sample 1:

It is argued that teaching in lecture halls to large numbers of students is outdated and that instead, these should take place exclusively on the internet. This essay disagrees with the above statement. The essay will first discuss how interaction between students and teachers is essential to the learning process, followed by a discussion of how demotivating learning online can be.

Learning via computer may be convenient, but it stops students and teachers actually talking to each other about their subject. Pupils need to ask the teacher questions in order to fully understand the material and they also need to talk about the topic to help them remember and fully understand it. For example, the School of Law at Queen’s University allows students to question the professor at the end of each lecture and then they have a seminar in which learners can debate each topic, resulting in some of the best exam results in the UK.

Presenting lectures solely online also presents the problem of students not being motivated to watch them. It would be very difficult to know who actually viewed the lecture and if students know this, it is likely to result in more people not watching and not being fully prepared for the exam at the end of the course. For instance, Udemy, the online learning company, found that only 12% of people who purchased their online courses actually watched all the videos and completed the online tasks, principally due to lack of supervision.

In conclusion, exclusively online lectures are a bad idea because they do not allow face-to-face communication and they can lead to a drop-off in student attendance.

Sample 2:

Technological advancements have brought significant changes in walks of life, including education where it has opened up an option of online classrooms. This has prompted many to suggest shelving classroom-based teaching methods. As to why technology is considered as the future of education will be discussed in this essay.

Technology has not only introduced the concept of distance learning but also, it has removed the time and place barrier from the way of learning. For instance, with the improvement in the educational structure, a person who is willing to go for higher qualifications can enroll for classes through the internet with ease without causing any harm to set schedule. Also, with the help of such growth, one can provide custom made tutorials to anyone across the globe such as providing guided lessons to a student sitting oceans apart which can be viewed anytime with a facility to watch lessons multiple times.

Similarly, conventional teaching is a tedious way of imparting knowledge. In such a setting, teachers usually interact with more than a hundred students at one time, and a few students may not be able to cope with the others. For example, in a traditional setup, where the educator is focusing on completing the syllabus, will not be able to repeat the whole chapter for any new student in the middle of the session. Moreover, such arrangements also face resistance from those who fail to express their doubts, fearing being judged for not being able to comprehend. 

In hindsight, it is needless to say that technology has not only enhanced the learning experiences in many ways but also has laid unprecedented convenience at the disposal of learners, whereas the classroom sessions are now only restricted to areas which lack the better infrastructure and technology.

Sample 3:

There is a school of thought which advocates that physically delivering lectures to large audience is not viable anymore. With the advent of this techno-savvy era the world should be doing everything electronically. I do not whole-heartedly agree with this concept and feel that some parts of the lecture require a human presence.

In today’s environment, it is more practical and cost-effective to teach online. Almost every aspect of education can be digitized and delivered. The students also have an edge while learning as they can learn from the best global teachers and access to universal educational resources. Apart from that in situations like pandemics and disruptions of daily life, online lecturing can be extremely relevant. Therefore, it is feasible that this mode of imparting education is very effective not only for the people who deliver but also for the pupils who attend these sessions.

On the contrary, the traditional model of delivering lectures has its own charm. The teacher is physically present, and mentoring is easy. A holistic approach can be taken by the teacher to teach as the bonding between teacher and student is much more. Some concepts which require a demonstration like dissecting a body or having hand-on experience in a carpentry shop cannot be delivered online. These minor areas which require experiments can be a major deterrent to complete digitization. So, we cannot completely rule out this method which has been prevalent for eons.

From my perspective, it is not a wise thing to convert everything online and remove the human presence totally. A hybrid model can be evolved in which a speck of human factor is blended with digitization to bolster education.

Sample 4:

There is currently a contentious argument over whether physical presentations should keep being held or be replaced by online ones as a new way of schooling in regard to the advance of technical resources. I believe that e-learning is the recommended option due to its convenience in comparison to the contemporary way of learning.

Firstly, having online classes or lectures is far more practical than regular ones. Online apprenticeship brought together all qualities that the future requires, which is unavoidable for most countries in the years to come because it offers the feasibility of learning from anywhere and in most cases at any time. For instance, if starts raining then the student will not have to mind going to school to attend classes as all what he needs is a good internet connection to attend the classes from their home which is really convenient.

Secondly, attending a virtual environment for lectures can be cheaper. This underlying trend allows institutions to cut direct costs; therefore, the price for attending a specific school or college will dramatically drop, which offer more opportunities for those students who cannot afford high tuitions especially in poor areas or in developing countries. Thus, considering that most learning institutions will not have to tackle the costs with water, lighting, rental and suchlike it is only a matter of time until the society starts to fell the benefits from the online learning.

In conclusion, when it comes to lectures, the e-learning system has proved that is far convenient for society as it is possible to access any platform from anywhere. Furthermore, tuition from private institutions tends to decrease at an alarming rate since they will not have to cope with staples costs to maintain their functionality.

Sample 5:

Technological advancements in recent times have brought significant changes to our lives. It is often thought by many that classroom-based teaching methods are old fashioned and should not be continued in this era of technology. I completely agree with this viewpoint. This essay discusses how technology helps improve our teaching processes.

Firstly, technology has introduced the concept of distance learning. In other words, it has removed the time and place barrier from the way of learning. In a traditional way of teaching, the teacher and students were required to be in the same place at the same time. In contrast, with the help of electronic gadgets and the internet, one can deliver lectures to multiple students who are residing in the other hemisphere. To exemplify, many teachers in Pakistan now teach to people who are living in foreign countries and cannot travel to Pakistan to attend classes.

Secondly, personalized learning experience has become possible with the help of advanced technology. In classroom-based teaching, a teacher would be interacting with more than a hundred students at one time, and a student may not be able to cope with the other students. However, technology has allowed us to take one-on-one sessions so that learning can be enhanced. In addition to this, we can watch and listen to recorded lectures multiple times, which helps clarify our confusion. For instance, one of my friends has opted to take coaching classes from an Indian teacher rather than joining classes in the institution to get a personalized experience.

In conclusion, it is needless to say that technology has improved the learning experience in myriad ways. It has removed the hazards of space and time and has made customized learning experience possible. It is predicted that in the future, more and more lectures will be delivered through online classes.

Sample 6:

It is true that current generations are obliged to participate in not only formal classes but also extra ones.

On the one hand, the proponents of said opinion have their rational grounds. First, this measure would endow useful and versatile individuals in society. Particularly, increased study time allows students to be able to learn more subjects, and they would have more skills in more majors, which is very important to society’s development. In fact, to be able to handle the problems of accounting software, society will need individuals who study both programming and economics. Second, excellent civilians are able to receive a significant number of vocation chances when graduating. Particularly, students would graduate with excellent degrees which endow a competitive advantage for undergraduates when they face employers in the upcoming years. If one day this measure ceases to exist, students have to join an intense competition to seek an excellent job.

On the other hand, the above arguments are insufficient to overshadow the shortcoming of the topic in question. The most pertinent reason is that learning excessively has detrimental impacts on the mental and physical well-being of pupils. Specifically, because students have to join extra classes after school, they lack respite. Worse still, learning too much in a long time forces them to deplete relaxation time. In addition, said practice prevents children from developing social relationships because of a lack of time. Particularly, studying could occupy all their leisure time, which should have been allocated to communication with friends. In reality, they are able to become lonely and reclusive adults, and lack interpersonal skills, one of which is public speaking.

In conclusion, it is indisputable that this policy allows learners to become versatile and own wonderful vocations. Nevertheless, the health of students and lacking soft skills are the matters which render this practice no longer an optimal decision.

Sample 1:

Since times immemorial, evolution has played an important role in the growth and development of the human species. From a nomadic life in the jungles to a civilized society with customs and regulations, man has come a long way. A century ago, it was believed that human beings were making positive developments in all aspects of life. Moreover, in today's world, it is often debated whether we have reached the targets which we had set for ourselves. This essay will analyze this statement critically and try to come to a conclusion.

Undoubtedly, science and technology have progressed by leaps and bounds. Firstly, from igniting fire by friction of two stones to sending spaceships to other planets, man has come a long way. In his quest for knowledge, he has conquered and used nuclear powers, other sources of energy like sun, wind, and water to his advantage. To illustrate, the invention of the nuclear bomb, utilisation of solar energy, and tidal energy to generate electricity are examples of their evolution. Secondly, the knowledge of the physiology of the human body has enabled us to create a living being from a single cell by the process of cloning. In-vitro fertilization has given hope to millions of infertile couples worldwide to being their progeny into the world. Organ transplantation is a reality and not a myth. Every day, newer medicines and principles of treatment are invented which has led to increased life expectancy of human beings. For example, over the last 50 years, the mean life expectancy has increased from 50 years to 60 years worldwide. Last but not the least, the invention of the computer and internet has brought the world closer. Within seconds, we can connect to anyone, anywhere in the world through Skype and Whatsapp. All this was a distant dream when the first computer was invented by Charles Babbage.

But, just as a coin has two sides, there are areas where we have failed miserably. Firstly, in our race for prosperity and quality of life, we have forgotten the virtues of honesty, hard work, and respect for elders, which our ancestors believed in. We have taught our progeny all about science, without teaching them moral values needed to sustain humanity. This has endangered the very existence of the human species. The nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are a classic example of this failure on our part. Moreover, tolerance has decreased worldwide to hate crimes and other terrorist activities which endanger peace and sanity of our mother earth. So, essentially on our path to scientific progress, we have left our humane qualities behind.

To reiterate, it is true that although we have made massive breakthroughs in the fields of science and information technology, qualities which distinguished us from other animal species have been pushed to the backburner. This is a threat to the basic existence of mankind and therefore, we must make consolidated efforts to rekindle the good qualities of the human spirit.

Sample 2:

It is irrefutable that the world we live in today has changed beyond recognizable limits to what it was a hundred years ago. It has all been possible due to the growth of science and technology. This essay shall look into some areas in which we have made progress and the areas in which we still have a lot to do.

Let us first consider the growth in medical science. We have discovered newer cures and medicines for many diseases which were earlier considered untreatable. Even the surgical techniques adopted today are safer and quicker. Organ transplantation surgeries have given life to many.

Furthermore, there have been revolutionary developments in the transport and communication sector. Air travel has become safer and faster. Road and rail transport have also achieved newer heights. Communication technology has shrunk the planet Earth into a global village. People are now constantly in touch with each other through the mobile phone and the internet. The internet is an ocean of knowledge. Even manufacturing technology has made mass production available and everything is available to everyone in all corners of the world.

However, there are still many sectors where we have to work further. Treatments for many types of cancers and AIDS have yet to be found. Alternative sources of energy have yet to be widely recognized and adopted. Ways to reduce pollution and thus put a halt to global warming have yet to be made. Many frontiers of outer space have yet to be explored. Effective ways to destroy nuclear waste have yet to be found.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that we have made a lot of progress in the last hundred years but there are still many areas in which we have to work further.

Sample 1:

People have different views with regard to which is the most effective way to deter crime. While I admit that putting people in jail for an extended time is an excellent measure, I would argue that there are other alternatives that are equally important.

On the one hand, I believe giving longer prison sentences to criminals could do wonders for the battle against crime. Firstly, this method would act as a deterrent since it may discourage people from breaking the law. Knowing they would serve a long prison sentence, those who have the idea of committing a crime would think carefully and realize that it would not be worth the risk. Furthermore, a longer time in incarceration may help rehabilitate offenders. This is because they have more time to think about what they have done and feel remorse for their wrong behavior. Therefore, when being released, they would be afraid of engaging in activities that could lead to criminality.

On the other hand, other alternatives are also essential to reduce the crime rate. The first measure is for authorities to hold more workshops which educate people on legal knowledge. These programs would help people realize how risky breaking the law is, and therefore could raise people's awareness. Another good step is for the government to install more surveillance cameras and have more policemen patrolling the streets. This clearly could prevent pre petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets, since they are less likely to operate when being watched. Last but not least, ensuring that ex- prisoners will have a decent job when they are free is a great relapse prevention plan. Being able to support themselves and their family, they have no reason to turn back to crime.

In conclusion, although letting people serve long prison sentences can be a great contributor to preventing crime, there are other effective measures that need to be taken simultaneously.

Sample 2:

Crime is a serious problem across the globe and all countries are trying to deal with this pressing issue. A section of society believes that prison sentences for a longer duration can help reduce crime, whilst others disagree and argue that there are other better ways to solve this. This essay agrees with the argument that alternative ways such as educating people and giving them resources to earn are far more beneficial than confining them to a prison cell. This essay will discuss both points of view.

To begin with, many people believe that offenders should be punished with long prison sentences because this phenomenon can invoke fear among other criminals. In other words, if a person is already aware of the intensity of punishment before committing any crime, it will discourage him from becoming a criminal. For example, in the UAE, the rapist and the murderer usually get lifetime prison sentences, resulting in making people think twice before committing any serious crime. Hence, imposing strict punishment deters people from committing atrocities.

However, I believe that alternative ways such as providing proper education facilities and employment can solve the issues far more effectively. Sufficient education and job opportunities keep the masses busy and away from crimes. To exemplify, in Sweden education is free for everyone and the country’s authority is continuously working for more employment opportunities. That is the reason why Sweden tops the list of peaceful countries where the crime rate is almost ignorable.

In conclusion, longer prison terms certainly instill fear in the minds of potential criminals and discourage them from committing offences. However, eradicating the root cause of crime by providing education and employment opportunities is a far better option.

Sample 3:

In the modern century, the world suffers from an increase in the crime rate throughout many nations. This eventually breeds the fear of innocent civilians and forces them to demand stronger punishment for those who committed a crime. Some insist giving prisoners longer prison sentences, and others insist alternative ways will be more effective and I lay my thoughts alongside the alternative ways as well.

There are many benefits of sentencing offenders for a longer prison period. The longer the criminals who committed serious damage to others such as stealing, violence, arson and murder are separated from society, the higher the chances of the innocence being safe increases dramatically. During their time in prison, the offenders will have an opportunity to get them rehabilitated through many services available inside. For instance, they could reflect on their own behaviour and educate themselves in a way not to re-offend once they are released. Moreover, this long period of the prison sentence will work as a deterrent to future criminals.

On the other hand, others argue that there are more effective ways to reduce the crime rate. They insist that sparing their life after committing serious crimes involving one’s life will be only wasting the tax that citizens paid. Hence to sentence to death will show a powerful warning to other, which result in a stiff drop-in crime rate. In my opinion, these people can be of service to the whole community during their imprisonment. The labour force from these criminals will be a great contribution to society. It does not imply that these violent and dangerous people will be released and walk around the inner city freely. They will be under heavy supervision. For example, they will be tied to heavy chains and placed in construction sites to assist the building companies, or they could be working as farmers when the harvesting season comes.

To summarise, there are clear grounds both for and against long imprisonment. Thus, the government must protect innocent lives from brutal and reckless criminals by researching the best method out of all these fine arguments.

Sample 4:

Crime levels have been increasing at an exorbitant rate in the recent decades. The methods with which to curb the rising levels of crime are often a debated topic. Some argue that the best way to reduce delinquency is to give longer prison sentences, while others contend that there are better alternatives to tackle this epidemic. Both sides of this debate will be analysed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

Many believe that handing out longer jail sentences is the right measure to be employed, this makes sense as the main purpose of such punishments is to deter individuals from committing crimes in the first place. For instance, Saudi Arabia, where ramifications for committing a crime are much harsher than the rest of the world, has much lower crime rates than even the most developed nations. This example illustrates the fear that harsher sentences can instill in the hearts of potential criminals. Hence, it is obvious why this point of view has garnered support.

On the contrary, some argue that there are better alternatives than longer prison sentences such as educational programs and community services. Take a study conducted by a non-profit organisation in my area, for example, which found out that people become more empathetic after spending time with people from disadvantaged backgrounds. As a result of this increased sympathy, people are less likely to commit heinous crimes. Therefore, it is comprehensible why this is a popular opinion among many.

After musing upon both sides of this argument, it is felt that a balance should be struck between handing out longer prison sentences and other measures. It is hoped that felony rates will decrease in the coming years and the world will become a safer place to live in.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, crime rates are inclined and there has been a discussion on possible steps that could be implemented to tackle the scenario. However, a debate has arisen between two groups of citizens. While the majority thinks that an extended imprisonment would be the best way, some are of the opinion that better options are required to be explored and implemented.

To begin with, long-term incarceration is a practical and effective method of removing criminals from society. Thinking about a long-term prison term will deter someone from committing an offense psychologically. Elaborating on it, they will consider a wretched life in prison before engaging in any unlawful activity. Especially, crimes like murder, rape, or arson which are completely the intention of the criminal deserve severe penalties. Thus, extended prison punishment would work in reducing crime rates.

However, it is not completely acceptable to consider long imprisonment as the best way to tackle the situation. Criminals are humans, after all, any living being is capable of adapting to changes, small or big. Illustrating it, being in jail for a long period can crush them into guilt and aggression, on the other hand, organizing rehab centers or labor training can help them engage themselves in productive activity. This will not only imply productivity but also flexibility in switching aspects of life. 

In conclusion, lengthy prison sentences are an effective way to stop people from committing crimes but to reduce the overall crime rate, a change in criminal perception along with a chance to show abilities to do something productive is necessary and effective too. I strongly believe that criminals should be provided with different ways to improve themselves rather than putting an end to his/her life for a long time. 

Sample 6:

There are numerous negative effects on the country that could possibly result from rising crime. Long-term incarceration is seen to lessen this occurrence by some, although others claim that rehabilitation may assist lower the ratio. However, I will go over both points of view and then state my position.

To start with, crime rates are a major challenge to society as a whole. We need to identify the contributing elements to crime if we want to lower the rate. Social problems including a lack of possibilities in life, poverty, and low educational attainment might inspire people to engage in an illegal activity instead of just being motivated by malice. Hence exploring different ways to provide at least basic amenities to poor families, especially the criminal or culprits’ families could be very helpful. Moreover, charity organizations should be organized and promoted by the public sector, which supports the objectives of the culprits’ well-being.

However, there are many benefits of sentencing offenders to a longer prison period. A convincing argument for the incapacitating effect of prison is that while convicted, a criminal cannot commit more crimes in public. Because of the dread that this occurrence can inspire in other criminals, many people think that culprits should be punished with lengthy prison terms. In other words, if someone is informed of the severity of the penalty beforehand, it will deter them from committing any crimes.

To summarize, rates of crime shall be reduced by any means, but more efficient ways could be used rather than long prison sentences. Extended jail punishment can be considered effective for the short term, but it cannot be called an idle way to improve the country’s position as far as crimes are concerned. Hence, reducing overall crime rates should be done by way of facilitating education and charity.

Sample 7:

Crime is a major issue that needs to be addressed nationwide, and all nations are working to do so. Whilst others in society feel that longer jail terms can help reduce crime, others disagree and contend that there are alternative, more effective solutions. This essay supports the claim that less harmful alternatives to locking individuals up in a cell include educating them and providing them with the means to support themselves. Both perspectives will be discussed in this essay.

To begin with, many people opine that criminals should be sentenced to imprisonment for a longer time than usual. I think this opinion must have arrived from a victim-conscious perspective where people have either witnessed an illegal deed or have actually been driven by looking at how its consequences affect other people. Basically, the motive behind this opinion is to send a message to other ill-motivated people so that further crimes may stop. 

However, I think alternative approaches, including establishing suitable educational facilities and employment opportunities, can address the challenges far more successfully. Setting up a message would not win against setting up hope for similar culprits out there in society. Intricating it, the government should provide education in order to make them aware of their own abilities to achieve things by legal means. A little confidence could lift their hope to give another try to their journey.

In conclusion, longer prison sentences undoubtedly induce fear in would-be offenders and deter them from committing crimes. However, my opinion is that it is far preferable to eradicate the primary source of crime by offering education and economic possibilities.

Sample 8:

The upsurge in crime rates across numerous countries in the twenty-first century is a problem for the entire planet. As a result, dread soon spreads among innocent bystanders, driving them to call for harsher penalties to be meted out to criminals. I place my opinions alongside the alternative methods because some people think that handing offenders lengthier prison terms will be more beneficial.

Longer prison terms for offenders have several advantages. The likelihood that the innocent will remain secure grows considerably the longer offenders who have caused serious harm to others such as theft, violence, arson, and murder are exiled from society. Through a variety of services offered inside, criminals will have the chance to get themselves rehabilitated while they are incarcerated. For instance, individuals should examine their own actions and educate themselves on how to avoid committing crimes again after being freed. Additionally, the lengthy prison term will serve as a deterrent to potential criminals.

Others, though, contend that there are more practical ways to lower crime. They maintain that if their life is spared after committing heinous crimes affecting human life, the tax that the public has already paid will be wasted. Therefore, a death sentence will serve as a potent deterrent to others, which will sharply reduce crime. It does not suggest that these threatening and aggressive individuals would be freed and allowed to roam the inner city. These individuals, in my opinion, may benefit the entire community while they are incarcerated.

In conclusion, arguments are quite convincing for and against lengthy imprisonment. Therefore, the government must investigate the best strategy out of all these excellent arguments in order to defend innocent lives from harsh and careless offenders. I think that the government should be concerned about the root causes and explore more practical and effective ways accordingly.

Sample 9:

Crime is a serious and growing problem in most societies. Although many people believe that the best way to tackle this is to place people in prison for longer periods, others are of the opinion that other measures will be more effective.

There are benefits of giving offenders longer prison sentences. Firstly, spending a long time in prison provides an opportunity for the prison services to rehabilitate a prisoner. For example, someone who has committed a serious offence such as assault will need a long time in prison in order to be sure they can be re-educated not to re-offend. In addition to this, longer prison sentences will act as a deterrent for someone who is thinking of committing a crime.

However, some people argue that leaving people in prison for a long time means that they will mix with other criminals and so their character will not improve. One alternative is community service. This gives an offender the opportunity to give something positive back to society, and so it may improve their character. Also, the government could focus its resources on the causes of crime, which would lead to less crime in the future.

In my opinion, it is important to look at alternative methods. Many countries have lengthy prison sentences, but crime has continued to increase throughout the world, so it is clear that this is not completely effective. That said, long prison sentences should remain for those who commit serious crimes such as assault or murder, as justice for the victim and their family should take priority.

To conclude, there are good arguments for and against long sentences, so governments must continue to research the various methods of crime reduction to ensure effective policies are in place.

Sample 10:

At this time, there's hardly any country that has got no crime. The rate of crime is increasing day by day and has caused a serious problem to deal with across the globe. This has led to fear in the minds of innocent people and has forced the law to give stronger punishment to those who are committing it. Many people believe that increasing the sentence of a prisoner can be the solution to reducing the rate of crime while others believe in other alternatives to reduce crime.

To start with, many people believe that there are advantages of long sentencing to a prisoner. Firstly, a prisoner can understand the mistakes he committed during his time in prison. For example, he can start a new life by availing free education from the government inside the prison and learning productive activities. This will help him to get motivated and he can start an honest life by proper means of earning. Another important aspect of a long prison is that, if the sentence is too long then the person will think twice before committing a crime. The intensity of the punishment will generate fear in his mind.

However, some people think long prison sentences can hurt the mind of the prisoner and have adverse effects on him. Inside the prison, they get to stay with other prisoners which may motivate them to plan things worse. Hence staying long with other prisoners will not change the character of the person but give rise to more serious issues. The only solution for this issue is to give separate schooling and proper counseling. The government needs to give jobs to the unemployed as most crime is committed due to a lack of financial stability. With proper opportunities and jobs, one can feel positivity in their mind which will keep negative thoughts away.

In the end, I believe that a longer sentence can reduce crime because of its intensity, but the government should also take steps to stop the crime before it gets committed by providing proper jobs and facilities to the people.

Sample 11:

People have different views regarding the reduction of crimes. Some think long tenure can be the solution for it and some prefer other solutions for it. Both ways have different outcomes.

On one hand, there are certain benefits of long prison sentences. The criminals will not commit a crime when they realize that they have to spend a long time in prison in a harsh way. Moreover, the citizens will feel safe and secure when the offender is behind bars. For example, many people used to be afraid while passing from the Araku Jungle near Andhra Pradesh due to the heists performed by the dacoits, so the local people who used to pass nearby from the jungle or tourists were very worried. When the dacoits were caught by the police and put behind bars, the people felt secure and comfortable while passing from that forest.

On the other hand, there are people who believe in other ways rather than giving long prison sentences. The offender can be put in a rehabilitation center. The police should maintain the law and order more strictly. The prisoner should be given vocational training so that he can earn a living after getting out of prison. There are also counseling sessions inside the prison and there are reports of offenders becoming good after the counseling and in return getting their sentence reduced by the government.

In conclusion, I think the government should intervene more in helping society to become better and thus reduce the negativity in people's minds.

Sample 12:

These days crimes are hitting an unbelievable high rate. The news channels and dailies are flooded with the commencement of illegal acts. With the advancement of technology, the crime rate has increased for its loopholes. Now the offender does not need to be present physically to commit a crime. In this topic, I would like to throw some light on increasing the sentence of prison and other alternative ways to reduce crime.

There are instances where prisoners commit more serious crimes after their release from jail. I believe the punishment should be as harder and longer in the same context of the crime. Most prisoners do not learn from their mistakes if the intensity of the punishment is low. They do the same violation against the law even after serving the penalty. Thus, the sentence should be long and hard enough to reduce the rate of crime.

However, some people agree with others on performing other alternatives to reduce the rate of crime. Here the government has a big role to play. Prisoners who can be re-educated by numerous penalties and punishment by getting trained and skilled must be under strict government observation. Sometimes they do catch nasty habits from their mates inside the jail. Overall, the government needs to focus more attention on unemployment. This will scrape the major reasons for performing criminal acts.

Therefore, in my opinion, the government should punish the offenders according to the severity of the crime, and punishment should be given after proper investigation and thinking of alternative ways to improve the person.

Sample 1:

While some people enjoy reading fiction, others prefer watching movies. Personally, I believe that reading fiction is more entertaining than watching films. In the following paragraphs, I shall elaborate on my viewpoint.

There are several advantages to reading fiction. Firstly, a book can be carried with you wherever you go. For example, one can read a book while travelling or taking the bus. Secondly, reading enhances one’s vocabulary and even writing skills. Consequently, it is vital for youngsters as it broadens their interests, strengthens their creativity, and allows them to absorb more information and experience through literature. My mother always had me read a lot of books when I was a kid. Because of her, I had no trouble writing various types of essays in school and received great scores.

Additionally, reading seems like an active task to me. When one reads novels or short stories, one can imagine what is happening in the text or how the character feels. This makes the person more invested in the novel’s characters than in the movie. The way it is usually composed is simply phenomenal; one can visualize the situations more vividly than a movie could ever hope to represent and feel emotions. For example, I recently finished “Pride and Prejudice” by Jane Austen. I identified with the characters, especially the protagonist of the narrative. Austen’s portrayal of the figure is so beautiful that it elicits both sympathy and dread.

However, it cannot be denied that some individuals prefer watching movies to reading books. Several individuals find reading books mundane but enjoy viewing a movie in a theatre because of the sound effects, widescreen, etc. It is also a great way to unwind with friends, release stress and anxiety, and have fun.

In conclusion, viewing a movie with a group of people makes it more fun and remarkable. However, reading a book helps people engage in great details of the characters and overall plot.

Sample 2:

Some people prefer to read fiction. However, others like to watch movies. Personally, I think that the question whether reading fiction is more enjoyable than watching movies is a controversial one. For several reasons, which I will mention below, I think each of these options has its advantages.

On the one side, reading fiction brings many benefits. First of all, a book can be taken anywhere one goes. For example, while traveling or just taking a bus one can read a book. When I was a student a couple years ago, I used to read books while taking a boring lecture. Second of all, reading extends one's vocabulary, improves reading and even writing skills. Reading is essential for children. It extends their range of interests, improve their imagination and helps them gain more knowledge and experience through books. When I was a child my mom always made me read a lot of books. Thanks to her I did not have a problem with writing different kinds of essays in school and I got only high grades.

On the other side, watching movies has many benefits too. Firstly, movies usually have more influence on people, their behavior and mood. In addition, watching a movie in a movie theatre gives many advantages such as sound effects, a large screen, etc. Secondly, it is a good way to relax with one's friends, eliminate stress and tension and just have a good time. My husband and I like to watch a movie on Sunday evenings. We drink coffee, eat grapes or apples and make comments while watching the movie. In addition to these benefits, watching movies usually takes less time than reading the whole book.

In conclusion, I think that there is no doubt that watching a movie is more enjoyable and impressive than reading a book. However, reading a book brings more benefits for people in general. Moreover, children should spend more time reading books than watching different kinds of movies because scientists say that watching movies has much less use for the growing child.

Sample 3:

Nowadays the question of whether watching movies is more enjoyable than reading fiction is much discussed.  There are lots of different opinions and statements which are for and against these activities. In my opinion, reading novels and any other kind of books is a way more enjoyable than watching movies. However, I also think that both possibilities have their own advantages and disadvantages.

Primarily, reading a book is a way more personal experience, which can provide you with many benefits. The fact that you should imagine all of the author’s descriptions and characteristics can develop your imagination in a good way. This is impossible when you watch movies, because there you see the director’s idea and concept, instead of creating your own notion.

Secondly, reading a book is not only an entertaining activity, but also can expand a lot your vocabulary. No matter how educated you are, there is always a possibility to improve your knowledge and reading can help you a lot. Moreover, you can develop your own grammar structure and you are able to create your own writing style.

However, there are many people who prefer watching movies rather than reading books and these people have their own reasons for their choices. By watching a movie, you can save a lot of time, because the time you need to watch a movie is less than the time you need to read a book. Furthermore, you can share the experience of watching a movie with your family and friends.

To sum up, I believe that reading books is more enjoyable than watching a movie, although there are lots of advantages in both possibilities. Reading is a way more pleasurable activity, because it expands your ideas and improves your culture in many different ways.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, there has been a tremendous increase in the time spent watching movies or reading novels. Some people argue that they enjoy reading fiction novels more as compared to watching movies. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion on this regard.

First of all, people like to read fiction novels and short stories. These are written in a way to easily develop the interest of the readers. These are so popular among readers that many companies have developed tablets or book readers for them. Many readers like to read novels whenever they get time. For example, I have seen many people reading novels while traveling to their work in public transportation.

On the contrary, many people like to watch movies more as compared to reading novels. People in groups or families can enjoy movies watching together. It is also considered more entertaining. For example, a few friends can have a good time while watching movies and having popcorn. Furthermore, people can also dance to the tunes of songs in the movie.

To conclude, watching movies is more enjoyable as compared to reading fiction. It can be enjoyed more in groups, and families or friends love to watch movies together.

Sample 5:

Books and movies are some sort of entertainment for people to spend their leisure time. Some people think that reading fiction books brings more enjoyment than watching films. Personally, I do not agree with this opinion. These paragraphs will explain some reasons for my opinion before.

Firstly, video formats offer richer content than books. While the books tell the stories with text and some figures, movies show us some stories with moving scenes from their actor. Moreover, the supporting audio like sound effects and songs. This extensive kind of media can bring a stronger message from the filmmaker to the audience. Besides, it enables viewers to experience the same condition as the actors have in the film. For example, in horror movies, the director applies some horrifying sounds to build the vibe. Also, a film can touch human emotions whether it's a sad or happy scene. Therefore, I think it is more enjoyable due to the immersive experience that movies offer rather than books.

Another reason is that movies can be completed in a certain duration. Usually, the movies time length is about two hours. It contains a full storytelling structure like opening, conflict, resolution, and ending. In contrast, books usually take a longer time to complete. For instance, there is an Indonesian novel that tells an introduction of the main story in about 50 pages, which normally takes days to complete at a regular pace. If some individuals are not patient enough, they can get bored and not get an enjoyable experience.

To sum up, watching movies is more enjoyable than reading fiction books. It is because movies offer a lot more content to touch human emotion and can be completed in a shorter time than book reading.

Sample 6:

Undoubtedly, recently, the topic of whether reading fiction is more enjoyable or watching movies has sparked a heated debate. In my opinion, both are totally different in nature and hence, the advantages of both are totally different from each other. Therefore, the comparison is impossible.

On the one hand, firstly, when fiction books are considered, first of all, they are portable in nature, thus they can be taken anywhere one goes. That is to say that people in the first world countries and industrialized nations read different kinds of books such as novels or fictions to enjoy it when they are travelling by bus, taxi or metro. For a tangible example, scientists in 2008 in London and in a study proved that 66% of people who have used the public transport system for travelling have read different books on their travel. Secondly, people read books to increase their knowledge and experience, which can decrease the consequences of unwanted events in people's lives and this event is extremely enjoyable for individuals.

On the other hand, watching movies has many benefits too. First of all, watching movies or TV can affect behaviour and mood of people, thus it can be regarded as a remarkably valuable entertainment. In the second step, this kind of recreation extremely eliminates stress and tension, but it is not accessible anywhere.

To summarize, some people are of the opinion that watching movies is more enjoyable than reading novels, while others are opposed to this view. In my opinion, reading this kind of book is unbelievably more enjoyable than watching movies.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, people prefer watching movies to reading books as a hobby. While some people argue that reading books is more enjoyable, others indicate that going to the cinema is more preferable. In this essay, I will explain why reading stories is much more preferred.

To begin with, people take advantage of their imagination to the fullest when they read books. For example, reading allows people to imagine whatever they want to make. Let us take an example of Harry Porters series. Thanks to the series, people are able to imagine a magician's nation and how these wizards would be trained to become good magicians. In contrast to movies that limit the background, set and frame, stories do not limit people’s imagination. To be specific, readers are able to imagine a different type of castle from the movie. This example clearly represents how reading books can play a pivotal role in people's imagination.

On top of this, immersing oneself in books provides second-hand experiences for people. For instance, when people read fiction depicting some astronauts exploring Mars, people have an opportunity to experience being on Mars. This indirect experience can benefit people by broadening people's minds and knowledge. The more second-hand experiences they have, the more open-minded they become.

To sum up, readers have a more pleasant experience than movie-goers. Reading fictions supplies chances for readers to imagine without limits and bounds and to have second-hand experiences. Therefore, I strongly believe that reading stories is more pleasurable than watching movies.

Sample 8:

These days, some people relax after a busy day in numerous ways. Two very common methods are watching movies or reading fictional books. There are some people who choose reading as a preferred method to enjoy. However, others opt to watch movies or even series on TV. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present some characteristics of each choice.

Firstly, the fact of reading can present some benefits to human abilities. The first benefit is that reading and interpreting a text stimulates our brain in an intensive way. As a fact, we can observe the ones who are frequent readers, organize better the ideas and are even able to speak in a clearer speech. Secondly, fictional books usually can bring deeper ideas, and more complex story development and relationships among characters. For instance, some researchers state that a healthy habit is equaled to eating one apple a day and read one book a week.

On the other hand, some people prefer to watch movies instead of reading a story. Nowadays, while a book has the same textual information, a movie has evolved impressively when it applies visual effects, fighting scenes, 3D interactions. Therefore, the experience of watching movies has become richer every time. Secondly, beyond the difference of individual experiences, it is really fast to share reactions and emotions with family and friends while the movie is being watched. For example, it is really more common to invite friends to watch a movie, but not to read a book.

In conclusion, I do not agree that reading novels are more interesting than watching movies. I truly believe that a group experience is much more enjoyable than an individual experience. This is the main reason I would choose to watch a movie with the company of my family rather than reading a novel lonely.

Sample 9:

Some believe that reading a good story brings more joy and satisfaction than watching movies. This essay agrees with that statement because novels usually provide a deeper understanding and comprehension of the story and give a more intimate and personalized experience.

To begin with, reading fiction allows for a deeper engagement with the main figures in the story, understanding their motives and circumstances that develop intense emotions and might bring more satisfaction to a reading person. Readers have an opportunity to use their imagination to visualize scenes and characters based on the author's descriptions. This process fosters a sense of connection and ownership over the story, as readers actively participate in constructing the world within the text. Additionally, the act of reading encourages slower, more contemplative consumption, allowing readers to savour each word and sentence, thereby enhancing their appreciation of the storytelling craft.

Furthermore, reading fiction offers a more special and individual experience. Reading allows individuals to create their own mental images and interpretations based on their unique perspectives and experiences. This subjective aspect of reading fosters a sense of autonomy and agency, as readers have the freedom to envision the story in a way that resonates with them personally. This personalized engagement can deepen the emotional impact of the narrative, leading to a more fulfilling and enriching experience.

To conclude, readers have a more pleasant and rich encounter with the story. Reading fiction books gives a chance for readers to imagine without limits and bounds and feel a real connection with the characters.

Sample 1:

There is an opinion that employers should not overly concern themselves with what their employees wear, as their quality of work should be the primary focus. I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint, and this essay will elaborate on my reasons.

The major consideration for employers should indeed be the quality of their employees' work. When employers prioritize work performance over dress code, they create an environment where employees can focus on their tasks without unnecessary distractions. For example, in the tech industry, companies like Apple have adopted a more relaxed dress code, allowing employees to wear casual attire. This approach has contributed to a culture of innovation, where employees feel comfortable and empowered to generate groundbreaking ideas. By emphasizing work quality over attire, companies like Apple have demonstrated that allowing employees to dress comfortably can lead to enhanced creativity and productivity.

Furthermore, an excessive focus on dress codes can negatively impact inclusivity and diversity within the workplace. When employers impose strict dress codes, they may inadvertently exclude employees from various cultural backgrounds who have unique clothing preferences or requirements. For example, in multinational corporations with employees from diverse cultures, mandating a Western dress code might alienate those who prefer traditional attire. Embracing a more flexible dress code policy fosters an inclusive environment where employees from different cultural backgrounds feel respected and valued, contributing to a more harmonious and diverse workplace.

In conclusion, employers should place their main focus on the quality of their employees' work rather than micromanaging their attire. As exemplified by companies like Apple and multinational corporations, this approach not only enhances work performance but also fosters an inclusive and diverse working environment.

Sample 2:

Opinions vary regarding whether employers should focus on the working performance of their employees rather than on how they dress. Although a professional appearance can be important to a certain extent, I firmly believe that allowing employees to have some freedom in their clothing choices can have a ripple effect on their work performance.

One perspective claims that an established dress code is essential for portraying a professional image and fostering a conducive work environment. When employees are dressed in appropriate and tidy attire, it reflects positively on the company's reputation. Clients and customers are more likely to have confidence in a well-presented workforce, which can ultimately lead to increased business opportunities. However, I believe that establishing a more formal dress code is only necessary in a few cases. For client-facing roles, adhering to this policy is undoubtedly essential, whereas in a large number of situations and fields, it would not yield the same benefits.

Conversely, I completely support a more lenient approach to employee attire since focusing on the quality of work should supersede concerns about appearance. When individuals feel at ease and confident in what they wear, they are more likely to be content and motivated in their work environment. This positive mindset can lead to an increase in creative thinking and problem-solving abilities, which in turn can enhance overall productivity. Furthermore, in today's rapidly evolving work landscape, especially in tech-driven industries, a strict dress code may be perceived as outdated and hinder recruitment efforts, particularly among younger, innovative professionals who value a relaxed work environment.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments in favor of maintaining a formal dress code to project professionalism and enhance the company's image, I firmly believe that a more flexible approach to employee attire is conducive to productivity and overall job satisfaction.

Sample 3:

The way employees dress in the workplace has divided people over whether companies should be concerned with their staff’s choice of clothing. While some believe that how they dress is none of their employer’s business, as work performance should take precedence, I am inclined to disagree with them.

It is understandable that companies ought not to govern their employees' clothing. After all, productivity should be the primary focus of any firm, and personal matters should be left to the employee’s discretion. Being uptight about the staff members’ clothes may create unnecessary friction and drive down company morale; in turn, this will be detrimental to employee performance. Another argument, meanwhile, supports employees’ freedom to choose their clothing, as long as they stay appropriate. As opposed to enforcing rigid dress codes, this can help to create a more leisurely and comfortable workplace. Therefore, workers would have a relaxed environment to perform, leading to increased quality of their output.

Nevertheless, firms should be conscious of how their employees dress. This is because in certain sectors, particularly where publicity or presentation in front of clients is a significant element, clothes reflect the organization’s reputability. If employees look professional in their clothing, a positive impression can be created on customers and stakeholders. That is why investment banking firms, for instance, usually have strict dress codes, with heavy emphasis on formality and established styles. Inversely, should workers dress themselves sloppily, potential clients and members of the public might develop a negative perception of the business. The fashion industry can be notorious for this, since employees simply cannot afford to be seen in public as slovenly or too casual. It would seem from these points that workers’ clothing is a contributing element to an enterprise’s reputation; hence, concerns about it can be justified.

In conclusion, I disagree that companies should not be interested in the way their staff dress. It is recommended that they become aware of the possible impact employees' clothing choices can have and ensure that workers are dressed professionally.

Sample 4:

It is sometimes asserted that the management should not regulate their subordinates’ attire and instead place emphasis on the importance of work performance. I largely agree with this assertion given the fact that additional regulations cause greater work stress and damage companies’ competitive advantages; however complete freedom might be detrimental to the office environment.

The first rationale for my disagreement with the involvement of managers in the office dress code is the extra stress it imposes on employees. Specifically, they might interpret these policies as an invasion of their privacy and excessive supervision by bosses, further burdening their work. Conversely, if employers solely attend to work performance, employees can have a greater sense of freedom and autonomy and therefore exhibit innovation and commitment which drive their company’s success.

Another argument for why I oppose managers dictating workplace attire is the significant resources required for implementing and enforcing such regulations. Instead of lavishing valuable time and money on addressing employees’ appearances, managers can allocate these sources to more crucial factors, which more directly improve their company’s competitiveness, such as talent retention and product research.

However, I acknowledge that granting employees complete freedom in their office attire choices could potentially harm the professional work environment. For instance, some may opt for casual attire like jeans or flip-flops, which could convey a lack of seriousness towards work and respect for their colleagues. If this practice becomes ingrained in the workplace culture, it could negatively impact the company’s image of professionalism and dedication.

In conclusion, I am mostly in agreement with the proposition of those in management positions not dictating employees’ dress codes due to the stress it can generate at work and its potential to harm the company’s competitiveness although employees might dress inappropriately if there is no regulation. That is why managers and HR should develop a comprehensive plan to foster a culture of respect and unity among employees, ensuring that even in the absence of strict regulations, workers maintain appropriate attire standards.

Sample 5:

Some argue that employers should not focus on the attire of their employees, as it is the caliber of their work that truly matters. This essay will delve into this discourse, exploring the merits of each perspective and ultimately presenting a balanced view on the matter.

It is imperative to recognize that an employee’s competence and productivity should be the paramount concerns for any discerning employer. In today’s dynamic and fiercely competitive work environment, the value an employee brings through their profound skills and expertise far outweighs the significance of their attire. For instance, in creative industries such as graphic design or content creation, what holds utmost importance is the quality of the output rather than conforming to stringent formal dress codes. Furthermore, a workplace that wholeheartedly embraces individual expression fosters a more vibrant and diverse environment. Granting employees the latitude to dress comfortably and express their unique style can lead to elevated job satisfaction and a profound sense of belonging. This, in turn, engenders an atmosphere of heightened creativity and innovation within the team.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that in certain client-facing roles or industries with a high emphasis on professionalism, a specific level of dress code is imperative. In fields as esteemed as law, finance, or executive leadership, the image of the company is intricately linked with client trust, rendering adherence to a formal dress code a matter of necessity. This professional image not only instills confidence in clients but also mirrors the organization’s unwavering commitment to excellence. Moreover, in industries where safety stands as a priority, such as construction or manufacturing, enforcing specific dress codes transcends mere preference; it becomes a vital necessity. Protective gear, encompassing helmets, goggles, and specialized attire, stands as an indispensable aspect in ensuring the well-being of employees and averting potential accidents or injuries.

In conclusion, while the emphasis on an employee’s competence and productivity stands as of paramount importance, it is equally crucial to strike a judicious balance between professionalism and individual expression. In certain client-facing roles or positions where clothing styles significantly impact safety, I ardently advocate for the imposition of a stringent dress code.

Sample 6:

The importance of how employees dress at workplaces has already been recognised and accepted. Although I agree that the relaxation of the dress code at work is not a matter in measuring their performance, I think that in some areas, a strict dress code is essential.

In some companies, employees are allowed to dress in their own way. For example, many of my colleagues were promoted because they often care more about their performance improvement than the dress code at the workplace. In fact, they often dress casually as they explained that they feel more comfortable when doing their work. Also, there are similar examples at famous technology companies such as Google and Facebook where employers encourage relaxed dress code to create a fun, satisfied and creative environment.

In most cases, employers need to pay more attention to the way their staff dress for several reasons. Firstly, dressing formally promotes a professional working atmosphere and helps employees do their job better. To take the banking sector as an example, a uniform or a smart suit can convey an image of trustworthiness to ensure that customers feel confident that their money is in safe hands, thereby using the services of the bank. In this case, casual clothes can give a very bad first impression of the company. Secondly, wearing a uniform is a mandatory issue in some jobs like firefighters or doctors as such uniforms are sophisticatedly designed to allow people who wear them to work under hazardous or special working conditions.

To conclude, an employee’s ability to perform well in their job has to be the highest priority in any profession. Whether the dress code should be relaxed or strict should depend on the working environment and work culture of the workplace.

Sample 7:

In contemporary professional settings, there is a popular notion that employers should put a greater emphasis on the work productivity of subordinates rather than their attire. Personally, I disagree with this viewpoint and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why many individuals prefer the absence of dress codes at the workplace. Firstly, such restrictions on clothing seem to bear little relation to the overall growth and success of a company, which would be better indicated by workers’ actual job performances and contributions. Another argument against dress codes is that they are sometimes perceived to suppress individuality and self-expression. This lack of personal freedom could then give rise to decreased morale and job satisfaction among employees, potentially diminishing their productivity and delaying the general work progress.

On the other hand, I firmly believe that formal dress codes can have positive impacts on both the public image of an organization and the spirit of its employees. Regarding the former, an employee’s attire would reflect the professionalism and credibility of an entire company, a crucial factor in terms of customer dealings and interactions. To illustrate, a formally and politely dressed workforce is more likely to project a polished and credible image to clients or partners, facilitating business cooperation or negotiation processes. As for the latter, the introduction of dress codes could ensure that all employees are uniform in their appearance, thus fostering a strong sense of belonging and equality among the labor force. Such cohesion is particularly conducive to today’s team-oriented work environments.

To recapitulate briefly, despite the belief that employers should primarily focus on the overall work quality instead of their subordinates’ clothing, it is still my firm conviction that for optimal business operation and development, both aspects should be sufficiently addressed.

Sample 8:

Around the world, employers typically enforce some kind of dress code on their employees, be it a uniform or merely a code of formality. Some people, however, suggest that employers should not have these sorts of rules because it is more important that their staff work effectively. This essay will mostly disagree with that notion.

Admittedly, it is true that the quality of an employee’s work is more important than their appearance and thus it is understandable that some people say workplaces should not have rules concerning workers’ clothing. Indeed, in countries like the United Kingdom, it is normal for certain businesses like bars and music shops to allow their employees a reasonable amount of freedom to choose their own clothes and express their individuality.

However, there are much better reasons to argue that employers should enforce some form of dress code. First of all, there is of course the issue of safety and hygiene. Many workplaces have rules to protect their employees and customers, such as factories or restaurants. Elsewhere, it is important for staff to be easily identified by customers, so a uniform is necessary. For example, supermarkets need their staff to stand out from shoppers so that people can ask them for help. In addition, you have basic public morality, which, although admittedly subjective and constantly in flux, is a genuine concern in all parts of the world. Some types of clothing may be offensive to certain groups of people. It would be reasonable to require an employee not to wear a T-shirt with a swear word on it, for example.

In conclusion, although it does sound reasonable that people should have the right to wear what they want at work, this does not hold up to scrutiny for most workplaces and thus employers should continue to have reasonable rules governing what their employees wear while they work.

Sample 9:

In the modern workplace, dress codes are changing as employers focus more on results than on the rules that employees must follow. While I agree that the way people dress should be seen as irrelevant in many work contexts, I believe that dress codes still exist for good reason in certain professions.

On the one hand, many employers have stopped telling their staff how to dress, and I see this as a positive trend. Some of the most successful companies in the world, including technology giants like Google and Facebook, are famous for the relaxed office environments that they try to create. Employees are encouraged to dress casually, and even the company executives and leaders are rarely seen wearing anything other than T-shirts and jeans. However, while managers and programmers are free to dress how they like, they are expected to produce work of outstanding quality. It is clear from the performance and global dominance of such companies that strict dress codes are completely unnecessary in the technology sector.

However, I would also argue that rules regarding employees' clothing are still relevant in other work situations. We expect certain professionals, such as nurses, police officers and airline pilots, to wear uniforms. These uniforms may have a practical or safety function, but perhaps more importantly they identify the person’s position or role in society. Similarly, a lawyer, politician or school principal may choose to wear formal clothing in order to portray an image of authority, trustworthiness and diligence. I believe that most of us prefer to see these professionals in smart, formal attire, even if it is not strictly necessary.

In conclusion, I support the trend towards relaxed dress codes for workers, but I do not see it as applicable to all occupations or sectors of the economy.

Sample 10:

In today's dynamic workplace, the notion that attire is irrelevant and that an employee's merit should solely be gauged by their performance has gained traction. While this perspective holds merit, I argue that professional attire remains an essential aspect of corporate culture.

One valid viewpoint suggests that an employee's work quality should be the primary concern for employers, and the way someone dresses should be immaterial. This line of reasoning gains strength when considering roles such as software development or research, where an employee's attire has little to no bearing on performance. For instance, in the burgeoning tech industry of Vietnam, professionals often adopt a casual dress code while excelling in coding and problem-solving skills. However, the absence of a dress code can be detrimental in certain contexts. Take customer-facing roles in the banking sector, for example; if employees dressed too casually, it could potentially undermine the institution's reputation for professionalism and trustworthiness.

However, I believe that the importance of attire should not be overlooked, particularly in professions where presentation and first impressions hold significant weight. In Vietnam's growing hospitality industry, for instance, a hotel staff's impeccable appearance directly correlates with the establishment's perceived quality. Should a hotel in the heart of Ho Chi Minh City employ staff who appear unkempt, the repercussions would not merely be internal but would also tarnish the hotel's public image. While the quality of service is indispensable, the visual presentation serves as the initial touchpoint for customer interaction, which is equally valuable.

In conclusion, while the quality of work should undeniably be a focal point for employers, the role of appropriate dress code cannot be entirely dismissed. A nuanced approach that takes into account the specifics of the industry and job function is, therefore, essential for striking the right balance between appearance and performance.

Sample 1:

In this period of modernity, many people do not have financial discipline as they are spending huge amounts of money rather than saving for future needs. As a result, they are landing in problems at a later stage. My opinion, I strongly agree that this is a negative development, and my opinion will be discussed in my further paragraphs along with a sensible conclusion.

Supporting my agreement with the given statement, I firmly believe that people's earning capacity will decline with their age hence they should plan their savings when they are earning well. For instance, a survey conducted in Hong Kong revealed that most elderly people depend on their retirement benefits for their minimum needs. Moreover, due to the recession, we never know when we are going to lose our job so we should have a proper bank balance to lead a quality life during that tough situation.

Explaining some of the other points in favour of this statement, it is true that sufficient money is required to aim high and achieve something in life. For example, if we do not have a sufficient budget, we may not be able to join our loved ones in the best schools. Furthermore, the younger generation tends to spend too much on unnecessary things such as expensive gadgets, bikes and many more, which is not a good sign. As a result, they may get into a financial crisis.

In conclusion, I would like to say that the current spending trend is a negative development, one should spend money wisely to lead a quality life. I believe that the aforementioned points strongly support my viewpoint.

Sample 2:

Finishing up all the salary or keeping it for the needy day are the two options that people have had since the beginning. Apparently, the former possesses more advocates than the latter recently. There are several justifications for this phenomenon. And for each reason, the extent of positivity will be discussed in this article.

In fact, individuals used to save money for some objectives they would consider doing in the future. For example, they put aside some expenses for obtaining a house or car they wished for. However, nowadays many banks offer the public some huge loans which they cannot resist. As a result, they do not have to save up for the upcoming days, but also, they are obliged to pay the instalments of what they have already bought. This situation may be considered positive according to the majority because they believe the folk do not need to wait for years to get to their aims.

Another reason behind this using up the income would stem from inflation. For instance, a nation may have come up with the conclusion that everything they want to purchase will be pricier tomorrow. Consequently, they are frustrated with trying and not achieving their goals, which is the case in my country. In addition, some parts of society have concluded that saving up is another meaning of wasting money, due to the fact that our money value is decreasing day by day. Of course, this cannot be assumed as a beneficial development of a society.

In conclusion, exhausting all the people's bank accounts might root in distinct issues. The level this would be called a forward step for a community, depends very much on its cause. Moreover, the circumstance seems very much different from one culture to another.

Sample 3:

It is believed that most individuals have high expenditures as per their income source and as a result these people don't have any saved money. The high inflation rate and the way of living are the main causes for no saving. As I think it leads to negative development since we just live in present without caring about the future.

First, the rate of inflation is one of the most important reasons which leads to zero balance. This is a problem, which is regulated by the government, as it can be seen that every essential product has a high cost due to numerous taxes applied on it. Even if anyhow people manage to purchase these products, then they have to think about their accommodation, electricity and wifi, which becomes an integral part of the human. For example, In the year 2020, I have purchased a car and anyhow paid the loan of the car each month, but the high cost of fuel compelled me to take debt from my friend to maintain life. So, the rate of inflation disturbs the balance of expenditure and saving.

Secondly, maintaining a high living standard to create a false impression in society is the second significant reason that leads to high spending of money. Nowadays, people prefer to purchase branded clothes, gadgets, and luxurious cars and believe in visiting a prestigious hotel for dinner and lunch that needs a huge part of their income. For instance, one of my friends always talks about the price and he is extravagant never compromising with his living standard and in reality, he is always in debt. Therefore, people must think about their overall life.

To conclude, I believe that people must do monthly analysis about their expenditure and saving and should be conscious about the future, since no one knows what will happen next time.

Sample 4:

Currently, the phenomenon of developing a tendency towards expending money rather than saving has given rise to heated debate. This trend, from my perspective, can be considered a negative trend due to the following reasons.

Some compelling reasons can explain why not keeping some wealth in the reserves can cause some damage to humans. In the first place, we lead a hectic lifestyle in which challenging several unprecedented financial issues is far more likely to be inevitable. Specifically, just via falling back to your savings your financial wherewithal to deal with such monetary predicaments will be guaranteed. In the second place, people will suffer the consequences incurred to their life as a result of a lack of financial capability in their dotage just due to the fact that they are not tactful enough in keeping some cash in reserves. Essentially, in an organic family, earning a livelihood would be problematic when people step into their old age and their household expenditures will increase just owing to the fact that they should be welcoming more than before as a result of regular family reunions in which they have no alternative but to expend to make their children happy. Last but not least, savings as a cushion have a vital role in fulfilling your dreams and plans for the future. To drive my message home, I can give a matter of immigration as an example in which expenditures will cost you an arm and a leg when it comes to rendering financial compliance for the immigration office or catering to the basic needs for affording a rental house or living on your savings until you get hired.

Admittedly, being at liberty to spend your cash on what you are desired at the time without concerns about the future offers a redeeming feature such as the fact that you can enjoy yourself and your spending with the utmost freedom will be yielded in such a way that there would be no room to harbour regret in your mind. Despite that, some opinion polls indicate that such force major periods like the viral outbreak of Covid-19 put some people in trouble because of abandoning the thought of putting their salary into the banks to save for rainy days.

In conclusion, squirrelling away and striking a balance between saving and spending and refraining from going on spending sprees bring relief, comfort, and convenience to your life compared to applying the avenue of expending your income perfunctorily.

Sample 1:

In this period of modernity, many people do not have financial discipline as they are spending huge amounts of money rather than saving for future needs. As a result, they are landing in problems at a later stage. My opinion, I strongly agree that this is a negative development, and my opinion will be discussed in my further paragraphs along with a sensible conclusion.

Supporting my agreement with the given statement, I firmly believe that people's earning capacity will decline with their age hence they should plan their savings when they are earning well. For instance, a survey conducted in Hong Kong revealed that most elderly people depend on their retirement benefits for their minimum needs. Moreover, due to the recession, we never know when we are going to lose our job so we should have a proper bank balance to lead a quality life during that tough situation.

Explaining some of the other points in favour of this statement, it is true that sufficient money is required to aim high and achieve something in life. For example, if we do not have a sufficient budget, we may not be able to join our loved ones in the best schools. Furthermore, the younger generation tends to spend too much on unnecessary things such as expensive gadgets, bikes and many more, which is not a good sign. As a result, they may get into a financial crisis.

In conclusion, I would like to say that the current spending trend is a negative development, one should spend money wisely to lead a quality life. I believe that the aforementioned points strongly support my viewpoint.

Sample 2:

Finishing up all the salary or keeping it for the needy day are the two options that people have had since the beginning. Apparently, the former possesses more advocates than the latter recently. There are several justifications for this phenomenon. And for each reason, the extent of positivity will be discussed in this article.

In fact, individuals used to save money for some objectives they would consider doing in the future. For example, they put aside some expenses for obtaining a house or car they wished for. However, nowadays many banks offer the public some huge loans which they cannot resist. As a result, they do not have to save up for the upcoming days, but also, they are obliged to pay the instalments of what they have already bought. This situation may be considered positive according to the majority because they believe the folk do not need to wait for years to get to their aims.

Another reason behind this using up the income would stem from inflation. For instance, a nation may have come up with the conclusion that everything they want to purchase will be pricier tomorrow. Consequently, they are frustrated with trying and not achieving their goals, which is the case in my country. In addition, some parts of society have concluded that saving up is another meaning of wasting money, due to the fact that our money value is decreasing day by day. Of course, this cannot be assumed as a beneficial development of a society.

In conclusion, exhausting all the people's bank accounts might root in distinct issues. The level this would be called a forward step for a community, depends very much on its cause. Moreover, the circumstance seems very much different from one culture to another.

Sample 3:

It is believed that most individuals have high expenditures as per their income source and as a result these people don't have any saved money. The high inflation rate and the way of living are the main causes for no saving. As I think it leads to negative development since we just live in present without caring about the future.

First, the rate of inflation is one of the most important reasons which leads to zero balance. This is a problem, which is regulated by the government, as it can be seen that every essential product has a high cost due to numerous taxes applied on it. Even if anyhow people manage to purchase these products, then they have to think about their accommodation, electricity and wifi, which becomes an integral part of the human. For example, In the year 2020, I have purchased a car and anyhow paid the loan of the car each month, but the high cost of fuel compelled me to take debt from my friend to maintain life. So, the rate of inflation disturbs the balance of expenditure and saving.

Secondly, maintaining a high living standard to create a false impression in society is the second significant reason that leads to high spending of money. Nowadays, people prefer to purchase branded clothes, gadgets, and luxurious cars and believe in visiting a prestigious hotel for dinner and lunch that needs a huge part of their income. For instance, one of my friends always talks about the price and he is extravagant never compromising with his living standard and in reality, he is always in debt. Therefore, people must think about their overall life.

To conclude, I believe that people must do monthly analysis about their expenditure and saving and should be conscious about the future, since no one knows what will happen next time.

Sample 4:

Currently, the phenomenon of developing a tendency towards expending money rather than saving has given rise to heated debate. This trend, from my perspective, can be considered a negative trend due to the following reasons.

Some compelling reasons can explain why not keeping some wealth in the reserves can cause some damage to humans. In the first place, we lead a hectic lifestyle in which challenging several unprecedented financial issues is far more likely to be inevitable. Specifically, just via falling back to your savings your financial wherewithal to deal with such monetary predicaments will be guaranteed. In the second place, people will suffer the consequences incurred to their life as a result of a lack of financial capability in their dotage just due to the fact that they are not tactful enough in keeping some cash in reserves. Essentially, in an organic family, earning a livelihood would be problematic when people step into their old age and their household expenditures will increase just owing to the fact that they should be welcoming more than before as a result of regular family reunions in which they have no alternative but to expend to make their children happy. Last but not least, savings as a cushion have a vital role in fulfilling your dreams and plans for the future. To drive my message home, I can give a matter of immigration as an example in which expenditures will cost you an arm and a leg when it comes to rendering financial compliance for the immigration office or catering to the basic needs for affording a rental house or living on your savings until you get hired.

Admittedly, being at liberty to spend your cash on what you are desired at the time without concerns about the future offers a redeeming feature such as the fact that you can enjoy yourself and your spending with the utmost freedom will be yielded in such a way that there would be no room to harbour regret in your mind. Despite that, some opinion polls indicate that such force major periods like the viral outbreak of Covid-19 put some people in trouble because of abandoning the thought of putting their salary into the banks to save for rainy days.

In conclusion, squirrelling away and striking a balance between saving and spending and refraining from going on spending sprees bring relief, comfort, and convenience to your life compared to applying the avenue of expending your income perfunctorily.

Sample 1:

There are differing views on who should be responsible for making school rules – whether it should be the schoolchildren themselves or the teachers. While some people argue that children should have a say in making the rules, others believe that teachers are better equipped to make such decisions.

On the one hand, those who believe that schoolchildren should be allowed to make decisions about school rules argue that this would encourage a sense of responsibility and accountability in them. Giving them a voice in such matters could also help to foster a sense of ownership and engagement in the school community. Furthermore, allowing children to participate in the decision-making process could lead to more inclusive and democratic decision-making that takes into account the needs and interests of all stakeholders.

On the other hand, those who believe that teachers should be responsible for making the rules argue that they are better equipped to understand the educational needs of children and the school community. Teachers have years of experience and training that enables them to make informed decisions about what is best for the students. Furthermore, school rules must be made in accordance with the laws and regulations of the education system, which teachers are better equipped to understand and comply with.

In my opinion, while it is important to give children a voice in the decision-making process, the responsibility of making school rules should ultimately rest with the teachers. This is because teachers have the necessary knowledge and experience to make informed decisions that are in the best interest of the students and the school community. However, it is important to involve students in the decision-making process by seeking their input and feedback, as this will encourage a sense of ownership and responsibility among them.

In conclusion, while there are differing views on who should be responsible for making school rules, it is important to strike a balance between involving students in the decision-making process and entrusting teachers with the responsibility of making informed decisions. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a safe, inclusive, and productive learning environment for all students.

Sample 2:

Rules and regulations play an indispensable role in every person’s life, owing to which it is generally whether making rules in school is the responsibility of the mentor or not. Both views are discussed in the following paragraph, along with my perspective.

On the one hand, there are a plethora of reasons why making rules in school is beneficial if scholars make them. First and foremost, it reduces the burden of the tutor. This is because, provided that, in alma, a major rule is made by aspirants, then it is quite advantageous for the teacher as it solely reduces the stress of the mentor but also saves time. Besides this, it is also fruitful for the holistic development of children. Take Canada as an epitome, which showed despite various disadvantages, students in institutes make rules because it reduces either stress or depression from teachers. Consequently, it is constructive development and drastically improves student life.

On the other hand, other individuals believe that discipline is the educator’s responsibility because it creates ample conflicts among learners in the schools as students become the victim of inequality because of their affluent background. Moreover, it maintains equality among all the students in the schools, which is a justified boon for all the students. For instance, In the United Kingdom, teachers make decisions for students in order to maintain equality. As a result, it is fruitful for the students.

Having concluded, although making the decision by scholars reduces the burden on teachers, if teachers make decisions, then it is beneficial for students to bring equality.

Sample 3:

The question of who should have the authority to establish rules in schools is a topic of debate. While some people argue that this is the responsibility of children, I firmly believe that students should be allowed to participate in the process.

On the one hand, some people believe that the teachers, with their experience and expertise, should be in the authority of making rules. Teachers being adults are often equipped to see the long-term implications of the rules to ensure that they align with educational objectives. For example, a teacher might enforce a rule that prohibits students from using mobile phones during classes to prevent distractions and enhance their learning process. Apart from this, teachers can ensure that all of the rules are being consistently followed across all classes and grades. For example, a school might have a uniform rule which should be followed by every student regardless of their grade and class.

On the other hand, some people argue that students should have some say in the formulation of school rules. This perspective comes from the belief that students are in the best position to understand their needs and challenges. For example, the rule about the duration of breaks can be better decided by the student according to their attention span and need for relaxation. Moreover, involving students in the decision-making process can foster a sense of responsibility and ownership among them. For example, if students are involved in creating a rule about maintaining cleanliness in the school, they are more likely to understand its importance. In my opinion, the students should also be considered while making rules to ensure that they are practical and acceptable for all. It also promotes an inclusive and conducive learning environment.

To conclude, while teachers undoubtedly have the experience and expertise to make effective rules, I believe that the students should be allowed to participate in this process as it not only ensures that the rules are practical and relevant but also contributes to the development of the students.

Sample 4:

Nobody would dispute the fact that everyone should obey rules in society. While some people believe that only educators are allowed to participate in making rules in school, I hold the view that young students should be involved in it as well. In this essay, I will discuss both sides and give reasons for my opinion.

The reasons why young students should be involved in making rules are manifold. Firstly, it is true that children can learn from the decision-making process, and they can understand more about why rules are tremendously important. For example, children are more likely to follow the rules if their opinions are considered. Another key benefit is that these young students can learn how to make decisions, and this will help form their decision-making mind. Furthermore, it is obvious that children are in general more creative than adults, hence they can make the rules more interesting such as they can add more visuals.

However, there are benefits when solely teachers are allowed to make rules. Adults are more mature than children because they have more life experience and more knowledge. If only educators were making rules, the process would be more efficient. For instance, adults know what is best for their students, so multiple perspectives will still be considered. Although teachers are less creative than kids, rules are not supposed to be like arts, and they are supposed to be strict and clear.

In conclusion, although some people would argue that only educators should make rules, I believe that there are more benefits when young students also involve in the process, such as their creativity can make the rules more interesting, they can learn from making decisions, and they will be more likely to follow the rules.

Sample 1:

The pervasive use of the internet among young children, coupled with unsupervised access, has raised concerns about potential threats and dangers they might encounter in the digital realm. This essay explores the challenges children face online without parental supervision and proposes solutions to mitigate the associated risks.

Firstly, children navigating the online world without parental guidance may inadvertently expose themselves to inappropriate content, including violence, explicit material, and hate speech. For instance, a young child innocently searching for a favourite cartoon character could stumble upon explicit content that is not suitable for their age. This can have lasting psychological effects and shape their perceptions of acceptable behaviour.

Secondly, online interactions with strangers pose a significant threat, as children are vulnerable to manipulative individuals who might exploit their naivety. Cases of cyberbullying, online grooming, and identity theft are becoming increasingly common. For instance, a child interacting with a seemingly friendly online acquaintance may unknowingly share personal information and photos that could be used for malicious purposes.

To address these challenges, a multi-pronged approach is essential. First of all, parents should actively engage in their children's online activities and guide them on safe internet usage. They can also utilise the operating system and browser's parental control features to make a child's internet usage safe. Secondly, educational institutions can integrate digital literacy programmes into curricula to equip children with the skills to discern between trustworthy and harmful online sources. This education would help them get smarter at detecting harmful content and distinguish people who pretend to be friendly but have malicious intents.

In conclusion, unsupervised access to the internet exposes young children to various dangers, including inappropriate content and interactions with potential threats. However, by adopting a proactive approach that involves parents, schools, and policymakers, these problems can be addressed effectively. With comprehensive digital education and technological safeguards in place, children can navigate the online world safely and responsibly.

Sample 2:

The 21st century is marked by the internet revolution and with the coming of personal computers, kids often gravitate to them to play games, watch videos, interact socially and learn from educational websites. However, allowing your kids to access the internet without any parental supervision opens them to potential risk.

One of the biggest problems facing children all across the world with unsupervised access is that they might share information with people they shouldn’t. The risk associated with sharing personal information includes revealing identifiable information that could provide criminals with the child’s location or children can share their parent’s financial information online, like the credit card number. To solve this problem, parents and teachers need to come together to aware children about the possible risks of sharing information and teach them the nitty gritty of online interaction.

Another issue is the exposure of the child to cyber bullying. Cyber bullying involves online harassment, and it might occur in chat rooms, on social media websites and through email or text messages. With unsupervised access your child might either become the bully or the victim. This kind of bullying is slowly gaining momentum and recent cases of suicides have left people shocked. The problem could be addressed by parents taking care of what the child is doing on the internet. The communication between parents and the child must be friendly enough that the child can tell his/her parents of the issues she/he is facing.

To sum up, although it is clear that unsupervised access causes some major issues, it is undoubtedly possible to start to tackle these issues and use the internet in a more positive manner. Parents and teachers must take the lead in dealing with this problem, otherwise a whole lot of young lives will be disturbed.

Sample 3:

The internet has become an integral part of our daily lives, and it is no surprise that even young children have access to it. However, the lack of parental supervision can lead to a myriad of problems for children when they go online.

One of the main problems children face when using the internet without parental supervision is exposure to inappropriate content. The internet is filled with all sorts of content, and children may stumble upon violent, sexual, or other harmful material. This can have a negative impact on their psychological development and well-being. Additionally, children may also become victims of cyberbullying, as they interact with others online. This can lead to emotional distress and even physical harm in extreme cases.

Furthermore, children may also be at risk of falling prey to online predators. Without parental guidance, children may unknowingly share personal information with strangers, putting themselves in danger. This can lead to abduction, exploitation, or other serious threats to their safety.

To address these problems, it is crucial for parents to take an active role in monitoring their children’s online activities. Setting up parental controls and filters can help limit children’s exposure to inappropriate content. Moreover, parents should educate their children about online safety and the potential dangers they may encounter. Teaching children about the importance of privacy and the risks of sharing personal information online can go a long way in protecting them from online predators.

In conclusion, unsupervised access to the internet can pose significant risks for young children. However, with proper parental guidance and education, these problems can be mitigated. It is essential for parents to be proactive in ensuring their children’s safety while they navigate the online world.

Sample 4:

The increasing autonomy of young children on the internet, often without adequate parental oversight, raises significant safety concerns. This essay will discuss the primary issues children encounter online, such as identity theft and the spread of misinformation, and will propose effective interventions, including technological safeguards and proactive parental involvement.

The first significant risk for unsupervised children on the internet is identity theft. Young users often lack the necessary caution required to protect their personal information online, making them easy targets for identity thieves who may use stolen details to commit fraud. For example, a child might unknowingly share their family’s financial information while playing an online game that seems benign but is actually designed to harvest data. This vulnerability underscores the importance of implementing advanced security measures such as automatic encryption of sensitive information and regular audits of sites frequented by children to ensure compliance with data protection standards. Additionally, parents and educators should regularly update security software and educate children about the risks of sharing personal information online.

Another critical concern is the ease with which misinformation can be spread among young internet users, who may lack the critical thinking skills needed to evaluate the validity of the information they receive. This can lead to harmful behaviours or attitudes shaped by false narratives. Educational initiatives that emphasize media literacy from an early age can empower children to critically assess the content they encounter online. Schools should integrate lessons on media credibility into their curricula, teaching children to question the source and intent of the information they find. Furthermore, parents can reinforce these lessons at home by discussing real-world examples of misinformation and encouraging skeptical thinking about online content.

In conclusion, the dual threats of identity theft and misinformation significantly endanger children navigating the internet unsupervised. Addressing these issues effectively requires a combination of robust security protocols to protect personal information and comprehensive education strategies to foster discernment in young internet users.

Sample 5:

The pervasive access of the internet among young children, coupled with the lack of parental supervision, presents significant risks as they navigate online social interactions. This essay will explore the potential dangers such as exposure to inappropriate content and cyberbullying and propose solutions including stringent parental controls and educational programs.

Firstly, one of the primary concerns is the exposure to inappropriate content, which includes violent and adult materials that are not suitable for young minds. This exposure can lead to psychological distress or skewed perceptions of reality. Children, being naturally curious, may inadvertently stumble upon harmful websites or be manipulated by online predators who often disguise themselves as peers. Such encounters can have lasting negative effects on their development and mental health. For instance, a study by the Child Online Protection Act revealed that over 60% of children who encountered inappropriate content did so unintentionally. This underscores the need for protective measures that shield children from harmful digital content while allowing them educational benefits. Parental control tools and monitored internet use can significantly reduce these risks, providing a safer online environment for children.

Moreover, cyberbullying has emerged as a rampant issue affecting children online. The anonymity of the internet provides a shield behind which bullies operate, inflicting psychological harm through harassment or public shaming. This form of bullying can be particularly damaging as it follows the victim everywhere, accessible on all digital devices, exacerbating feelings of isolation and distress. The impact of such experiences can range from decreased self-esteem to severe anxiety and depression, affecting the child's social development and academic performance. Solutions to combat cyberbullying include the implementation of robust digital literacy programs that teach children about the responsible use of the internet. Schools can also play a pivotal role by integrating cyber ethics into their curriculum, ensuring children understand the consequences of their online actions and the importance of respecting others.

In conclusion, while the internet is a repository of vast knowledge and a platform for social interaction, it also poses significant risks to unsupervised children. By employing rigorous parental controls and fostering an environment of digital literacy and ethics, we can safeguard our children from the darker facets of the online world, ensuring their internet experience is both safe and educational.

Sample 6:

In today's advanced world, electronic devices are used widely for communication by society, especially the young generations. However, without parental supervision in doing so, children might be affected by the disadvantages of surfing the internet. This writing will discuss several negative impacts that can affect teenagers following some activities that can be done to overcome them.

There are numerous types of online crimes which can destructively impact the users such as online phishing. On the other hand, the majority of youngsters are not aware yet of the illegal activities done by evildoers. For instance, most of the perpetrators are looking for an innocent child who can be taken advantage of. Moreover, Adolescents might search for inappropriate websites where they accidentally click on something irrelevant and are redirected to other pages. From there, the hacker can track the owner's data namely bank account numbers, passwords, and house addresses which can be utilized by them to steal some money or even break into the victim's house.

Apart from the fact that there are a tremendous number of cyber crimes, parents can take part in controlling their loved ones, one of which is by using applications or routers to restrict some unverified sources. For example, an app called YouTube for kids can be easily used to entertain the under-aged watcher without fear of being disturbed by criminals. On top of that, elders can also give knowledge about crimes that have existed and forbid them from opening several pages. Therefore, the internet can finally be a safe place for people to look up pieces of information and news.

In conclusion, people can safely use the internet by controlling their kids with support from several technologies to limit the figures of sites that can be visited. In addition, parents can give their views to teenagers on the dangerous side of online-related activities.

Sample 7:

These days the internet is as essential as food for certain teenagers. Not only do they have unrestricted allowance to use the internet but also, they are using the internet to build social interaction. However, this trend brings with it numerous repercussions which need to be addressed and overpowered.

To commence with, fraud is the major issue a child could come across with unsupervised access to the internet. The social site is a hub for fraudsters. They trap innocent kids, especially girls, and misuse their private information and in worst cases, they even blackmail them to fulfil their sexual desires or monetary benefits. Furthermore, such incidents can traumatize an individual. Another problem that needs to be considered is that students can get distracted while studying. To exemplify, according to reports, there are around 3000 cases every month concerning the hacking of social media accounts for defamation. Hence, privacy is at stake through irrational access to the internet.

One immediate practical solution is that the internet should be allowed with parental controls and for a limited time only. Additionally, the feature of blocking unprotected websites should be implemented by parents. Moreover, constant monitoring is a necessity. For instance, AppVault is one such software which blocks and even at times tracks the usage of risky sites. Thus, with the help of technology, this hurdle can be crossed.

To conclude, although the internet has innumerable advantages and is a stack of knowledge yet excessive use by adolescents can be harmful to them as well as their families. Thus, continuous governance is mandatory.

Sample 8:

In recent times, the usage of the internet by youngsters has geared exceedingly to connect online socially. Although it is beneficial sometimes, this could probably prove to be life-threatening for a young child if not supervised. This essay will discuss two problems that have resulted from these trends and propose measures that might address them.

One concern in terms of sharing data network with children is that they may get trapped under unauthorized activities for their age. This is because many social applications such as Facebook and Instagram provide free access to socialize with the unknown person who might have a fake identity. To cite an example, a teenager might get enrolled in a group of criminals focusing on young boys to perform a certain crime, if their activities are left unattended by their guardians. To tackle this issue, parents could prevent their children by prohibiting access to networking sites by enabling sensitive mode up to a matured age.

Turning to another issue, one pressing problem is appealing to unqualified earning opportunities which are advertised online. In other words, while accessing online games children may come across money deals while playing with an opponent. A boy, for instance, who plays rummy at a young age might feel reluctant to study because of greediness to earn without studying. As a result, a dangerous situation in future may arise if not supervised by parents at an early stage. This problem could be mitigated by incorporating privacy options in various modes of the internet for an adolescent to ensure limited usage, omitting false activity and checking spontaneously.

In conclusion, two of the main concerns that unsupervised internet access can result in is the possibility of ruining childhood through involvement in crimes and the distraction caused in education by the means of gaining a sum of money based on online games. However, these problems can be managed via strict enforcement of limited accessibility and by participating in the performance of their everyday tasks online.

Sample 9:

The internet is the greatest invention of the 21st century, which has changed how youngsters socialize with others. However, full access to the web can have disturbing effects on the young ones, as they do not have the proper familiarity with the different websites and their effects. Although these issues can be managed by taking certain steps by the parents.

To begin with, giving maximum exposure to the adolescent with the world wide web without guardian supervision can be a risky thing. There are many reasons for it, like they don't have a proper understanding of the effect of these websites on their mind and there are high chances of getting addicted to them. For example, the content of the pornography covers almost 60-70% of the entire web, and it is most likely that children will get attached to it in their teenage's, which has many disturbing consequences on their mind and their character development. Hence, giving exposure to web without supervision of the parent can have negative results.

To resolve this particular problem, certain steps can be taken which can give a proper understanding to the children about the negatives of the internet. Firstly, parents can limit access to the internet which can restrict children from visiting harmful forums and pages on the network. For instance, nowadays there is an option available on the different browsers such as child protect, which will not allow to open eighteen plus content. Secondly, parents should give proper knowledge and the side effects of these websites, so that children can understand and have awareness about it. Thus, by taking certain measures we can prevent negative conditions.

To conclude, it is fact that the internet can lead teenagers to harmful links, which can create dangerous situations, if proper guardian supervision is not given. These problems can be solved by taking certain steps, such as limiting access to the certain website as well as imparting learning to the children.

Sample 10:

The usage of the internet has increased over the past few years. It provides us with multiple platforms to connect with people. Because of its easy-to-use nature, children can exploit it on their own. It may lead them to some dangerous situations. Hence, parents need to be careful with their usage of cyberspace.

The main problem with providing children with free and unrestricted access to the web is that they might get trapped in dangerous situations by bad people. Children cannot differentiate between right and wrong. The evildoers are always in search of young and innocent children over social media, whom they can exploit for their selfish purposes. For example, a thief may project himself as a very good person and try to get details such as the address, lifestyle of the child's parents, etc. Such details can then be used to rob the house.

Because the intensity of the threat is high, parents need to take some steps to save the children from the ill-effects of the web. Parents should try to be around when children are using the internet. This way they know which all websites their kids are using, and they can guide them. Parents should also use technological solutions such as software, which help parents track the browsing history of their kid. They can also purchase the software at the router levels, which will block some genre of websites and therefore, children cannot access them.

To conclude, exposure of the internet to the young may lead them to difficult situations, but, in this era, keeping them away from it is not an option. As a result, parents may need to use technological solutions to stay careful and attentive of the stuff their children have accessed over the web.

Sample 1:

Some people believe that the environment cannot be overhauled by individuals, rather it could only be improved by large organizations and the government. I strongly disagree with this statement because I believe that individual actions play the vital roles to facilitate the efficient activity of the waste management system, and they do it by conserving the environment and creating awareness among mass people

One of the most effective steps an individual could take is to maintain an appropriate disposal of non-biodegradable items. This would not only improve the environment, but also boost the efficient recycling of plastics and metals. Moreover, a large portion of pollution could be easily curbed if each of the citizens contributes towards maintaining a low emission atmosphere and restricts the wastage of natural resources. For instance, most of the Europe's environment has no pollution, as numerous citizens have opted for automobiles running on green fuels, and they have restricted usage of natural resources. Furthermore, it is not about the myriad ways that could be employed to make environment better, rather it is about the mindset of the people of a nation that needs to be transformed.

In addition, individuals can also influence other people in society through different channels; they can inspire more people to participate in a wide variety of environmental protection activities. A friend of mine is an environmentalist who established a Facebook page to encourage people to take part in her ocean cleaning team. The number of participants has been increasing significantly over the past few months. This example clearly shows that even with a very minor individual effort, huge support can be received from the public if we promote it in a proper way.

All things considered, the environment cannot be improved all alone by the government or large companies; rather it is the people of a nation who play an important role in environmental protection alongside the local authority and large companies’ contributions.

Sample 2:

The claim that "Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference" simplifies the complex issue of environmental conservation. This essay argues that alongside the pivotal role of governments and corporations, individual actions are equally crucial for a sustainable future. It will examine the synergy between large-scale efforts and personal initiatives in nurturing environmental health.

Governments and large companies indeed wield substantial power in effecting environmental change, possessing the resources and reach necessary to implement wide-ranging policies and innovations. For instance, government legislation can enforce emissions reductions, while corporations can invest in sustainable technologies, significantly curbing environmental degradation. These entities are pivotal in addressing global challenges such as climate change and deforestation, suggesting that their role is irreplaceable. Their ability to enact swift, large-scale changes underscores the argument that "only governments and large companies can make a difference."

However, undermining the potential of individual actions is a critical oversight. Grassroots movements and personal lifestyle changes have historically driven societal shifts towards sustainability. Simple acts like reducing waste, adopting renewable energy sources, and supporting eco-friendly businesses can collectively create a substantial impact. Furthermore, public demand for sustainable practices can influence both governmental policies and corporate strategies, demonstrating the interconnectedness of individual and institutional efforts. This challenges the notion that "Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment," highlighting the symbiotic relationship between personal initiative and systemic change.

In conclusion, the monumental efforts of governments and corporations are crucial, yet individual contributions are vital for environmental conservation. The oversimplified dichotomy overlooks the complex nature of environmental challenges, underscoring the need for a collective approach. Embracing both individual and large-scale actions is key to a sustainable future, highlighting that everyone has a role in preserving our planet.

Sample 3:

The problem of environmental degradation is becoming ever more significant nowadays; however, there is still a huge debate regarding who should be responsible to clean up the environment. I agree to some extent that the government and multinational firms should be made accountable for the damages, but I strongly believe that pollution will only be eradicated if every one of us work towards the same goal with the help of organizations.

To begin with, collective action is the key to alleviating environmental pollution. Everyone themselves does not have the power to change the earth for the better, but the billions of individuals together can make immense impact. For example, if everyone recycles one bottle every day, collectively the earth would have recycled 100 billion bottles daily and more than 30 trillion annually. Imagine how many marine animals can be saved from dying each year from plastic poisoning and suffocation.

On the other hand, governmental bodies and firms also have a major role to play in the creation of a cleaner and more sustainable earth. More specifically, governments should take the leading role in advocating and advertising the positive externalities of improving the environment, this may include educating the young about benefits of recycling, reusing, and reducing waste materials, which may eventually be passed to their parents, generating multiplier effects. Additionally, governments have the authority to provide prizes to businesses who reduce pollution to a certain level. Thus, firms will be encouraged to develop more environmentally friendly production methods, so preserving the environment.

To sum up, no individuals have the ability to make a big difference, but one should not think that they can leave it to others, because eventually no one will do anything due to this lack of accountability. Therefore, everyone living on earth is responsible for making a difference.

Sample 4:

In today’s globalised world, environmental protection has become a significant concern for everyone worldwide. However, it is argued that only the government and business conglomerates contribute to environment protection. For these people, an individual is roleless. However, I can’t entirely agree with this viewpoint because individuals can make substantial efforts to protect the environment.

It is undoubtedly true that human intervention to mother nature has led to the deterioration of the environment and has posed some serious threats. As a result, there is an urgent need to save the environment. People should realize it and make some significant contributions to protect the environment. For instance, they can save water by closing the faucet when not in use, save power by turning off the lights, and clean up the community garbage. In addition, a group of individuals can educate local people on pollution, set up campaigns to teach the conservation of water and trees, and so on.

Furthermore, individuals’ efforts will impact the environment positively. Despite the government’s efforts to safeguard the environment, every individual can make a habit of preserving the environment. Also, every individual has the right to make their own choices about protecting the environment. For example, individuals can make a difference by choosing public transportation for short distances. They can also follow the 3Rs, reduce, reuse, and recycle. The most effective way to protect the environment is to conserve energy, refrain from dumping wastes into the soil, and curbing plastics. Finally, they can attempt to plant as many trees as possible to maintain the ecological balance.

However, the government and business tycoons make a difference, where the government introduces environmental protection laws and implements strict regulations to address large-scale issues. The tycoons contribute donations to the government to carry out its strategy. Subsequently, they continue to cooperate and make full use of their powers to shield the environment.

To summarize, an individual’s input and efforts can significantly make the world a better place to live. As a result, I strongly oppose the claim that individual contributions are unimportant. They are just as important as the governments and businesses’ contributions in making a difference in the environment.

Sample 5:

For many people, environmental protection is solely the responsibility of governments and corporations, not of individuals. However, I believe that this huge task requires the cooperation of all forces in society.

Individuals can be considered as the smallest units of society where environmental actions start. Indeed, when living in the natural world, each person has a variety of needs every day to fulfil, and many of them directly affect the environment. For instance, a reduction in the use of plastic bags by a shopper, or an action of turning off unnecessary lights seems insignificant on the surface but really makes great differences in protecting the environment. In particular, cutting down on the number of plastic bags means saving the environment from the excessive plastic waste which leads to the contamination of oceans by micro-plastic. Meanwhile, using electricity sparingly helps limit the emission of greenhouse gases in thermal energy generation and slows down the depletion of natural resources like coal and natural gas. Therefore, thousands and millions of actions of each person during his or her life can entail a huge sum of impacts on the environment.

However, there also needs to be the interference of governments and colossal organizations in the fight against environmental pollution. Governments are expected to create a legal frame to ensure people do not dare to trade their clean environment for their economic achievements. Laws on forest protection, proper treatment of industrial waste, limited use of agricultural chemicals, heavy taxes on products harmful for the environment and the like are essential to keep society on track in sustainable development. Also, the participation of countries in international treaties of carbon neutrality also engender laws that require more responsibility from the corporate world to curb air pollution. As for huge companies with numerous manufacturing activities, they need to have their waste treated reasonably before discharge. If this is ensured, there will be at least no water and soil pollution in industrial zones and their neighbouring residential areas.

In conclusion, no matter how much people or organizations can contribute to the improvement of the environment, joint efforts of the whole society are essential to ensure that the contribution of one party is not ruined but resonated by that of others.

Sample 6:

It might be debated whether or not regular people have any responsibility for preserving the planet. There are others who believe that in order to save Earth, governments and corporations must shoulder an enormous responsibility. Both of them, in my view, need to do their part to protect the environment.

In the first place, it is correct that legislation protecting habitats should be enacted. All businesses, no matter how big or little, are in business to increase their wealth and earnings. They are more concerned with making money than they are with preventing catastrophic climate change. For instance, pollutants from industry cause severe air pollution in urban centres. Furthermore, there are industries that dump their garbage into waterways. As a result, the environment and aquatic life will suffer. This, in turn, will have repercussions for the planet's biosphere. Governments should thus impose heavy fines on businesses to encourage them to cut back on emissions and toxic waste.

Second, government entities should use social media to promote green behaviour. Therefore, advocating for recycling, decreasing plastic usage, and urging garden tree planting. The ideal approach is this, in my opinion, because forcing them to do it is like allowing reckless parents to have children. Overpopulated countries like India value individual freedom, making it more challenging to impose rules on the populous. In addition to this, individuals should be encouraged to use public transportation rather than driving.

In conclusion, governments should prohibit legislation that mandates emission and harmful material reductions by businesses. But individuals do their share by opting for eco-friendly lifestyles and taking advantage of public transportation.

Sample 7:

Only large corporations and governments can effect lasting change in the environment; individuals can do nothing to help. Since many different people have made important advances in this area, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint.

To begin with, many people all around the world have been working tirelessly on their own, for their own personal causes, to enhance the environment, and many have been rather successful. They have improved the ecosystem while working primarily alone with little help from the government. Tulsi Gowda, 72, who was recently honoured with India's highest civilian honour, the Padma, is a prime example. He cultivated a forest from scratch by planting more than 30,000 plants.

Second, self-employed people can start their own cleanliness projects for the sake of the environment and with minimal initial expenditure, all while avoiding cumbersome governmental red tape. They start with what they have, right where they are. They typically succeed through sheer determination and the assistance of volunteer resources (both financial and human). The river Kali Bein in Punjab, India was cleaned up in the year 2000 by the well-known environmentalist Balbir Singh Seechewala with the help of just volunteers. Whereas most projects that are undertaken by large corporations or governments need substantial investment of time and money.

As a result, I would argue that it is not correct to say that people on their own cannot effect positive change for the betterment of the environment, and that only governments and large organisations can do so. In contrast to popular belief, a huge number of individuals acting independently and successfully for the sake of the environment can accomplish the mission of restoring nature to her pristine splendour.

Sample 8:

It is commonly held nowadays that governments and multinational corporations are better equipped to clean up the environment than individuals are. In the next paragraphs, I'll elaborate on my arguments.

To begin, the government is better equipped to protect the environment due to the wide range of measures it can take. The transportation system, the leading contributor to global warming, is one of the many things that are primarily the purview of national governments. Due to inadequate public transportation options, many people in the United States rely significantly on their own cars. If the government invests in and makes improvements to the public transportation system, more people will choose to use it, and the difficulty associated with reducing pollution will be greatly reduced. But no single person can do these tasks.

However, big businesses play a crucial part in this as well. Waste from manufacturers, both in terms of toxic gases and water, is a significant contributor to pollution. It can be seen that during the process, manufacturers require a significant amount of water and fuel. After that, the waste is released into the environment, which eventually leads to a decline in the quality of life for both humans and marine life. Many serious environmental concerns can be easily alleviated if multinational corporations employ eco-friendly raw materials and energy sources and properly dispose of water.

To wrap up, I no longer believe that the government and huge corporations can effectively improve the environment by providing better quality transportation and by switching to renewable energy sources.

Sample 9:

Nowadays, environmental protection has become one of the most important issues the public are concerned about. While some people deem that it is the responsibility of the government and big companies to protect the environment because they hold power and pool the resources necessary while individuals are too feeble to make a lot of effort, I think that every individual can make a difference.

There is an old saying that goes as: Constant efforts bring success. This means that individuals did have the capacity to save our motherland if they band together and move towards the same direction. For example, if everyone in China saves one piece of paper every day, nearly a million trees can be saved in one day. Therefore, we must realize the power of each person and shoulder our own responsibility.

Moreover, the most important thing must be the effect on big companies and factories caused by public awareness and habits. Specifically, environmental-friendly behaviors of the public can largely influence the business strategies of big companies. For example, when disposable plastic bags are not popular anymore in the market, the manufacturers will stop their production and find eco-friendly replacements such as fabric bags. Thus, the power of individuals is maximized and makes a big difference.

However, that is not to say we should ignore the responsibility of the government and big companies. Admittedly, in solving some large-scale problems like deforestation and greenhouse effect, the government and big companies should fully harness their technology and power to come up with strategic plans.

In summary, everyone is responsible for protecting our planet. Meanwhile, the government and big companies should shoulder their responsibilities and make full use of their power and resources. Only in this way can we assure that we can hand over the planet to our next generation.

Sample 1:

It is argued that the architectural style of new buildings should be the same as that of old buildings in local areas, while others believe that people should be free to design their own house the way they prefer. I personally agree with the second group.

On the one hand, the primary reason why some people think that modern constructions should follow the style of the old ones in local areas is that this helps preserve traditional and cultural values, which could boost tourism in these areas. Take Hoi An, which is one of the most famous ancient cities in Vietnam, as an example. Local people in this city are encouraged to preserve their old houses or construct new houses in traditional architectural styles. As a result, Hoi An has become a popular tourist destination that attracts millions of tourists on an annual basis.

On the other hand, I would argue that people should have the right to make their own decisions when it comes to building their own house. The first reason is that many people do not like the style of old buildings in their neighbourhood. Their rights would be violated if they were forced to live in a house that they do not feel comfortable about the design. Another reason that needs to be mentioned is cost. It would be much cheaper to build a modern simple house rather than one which has to mirror past architectural standards.

In conclusion, although some people say that the design and construction of modern and traditional buildings should be the same, I personally believe that the owners should be allowed to decide the way their own house will be built.

Sample 1:

The significant rises of the population, fast paced life, crime rate and dependency on technology in the urban areas make more people become unacquainted with and unfriendly to their neighbours. However, there are measures that can be taken to alleviate this issue.

In today’s technology dependent era, people are mostly busy with their own work. Major streets in the cities are filled with busy people walking fast to reach their office or business place. They are even busy talking to their office colleagues and family members over the phone. After they return home late in the evening, they watch television, use computer and the Internet or spend time with family members. They scarcely have any time to socialise with neighbours. In some scenarios, people do not even know who lives next door in city areas. These are the everyday scenarios in the cities where social interactions could be rarely seen as individuals have no time to socialise and are much focused on their own work or personal interests.

Again, the rampant acceleration of crimes in the urban community makes individuals become unnecessarily cautious and suspicious about other people, especially with the people they meet for the very first time. Even trusting their own neighbourhood would be tough for them as they are in constant fear of being harmed. As a result, inhabitants of cities tend to become isolated as they are afraid to mingle because of undeveloped acquaintance. Unlike rural areas, where comparatively fewer people live together, city areas are highly populated, and it is not unlikely that several thousands of people live in a block. Maintaining social relationships with all of them is thus quite impossible.     

On the other hand, considering possible measures to improve a sense of community in the neighbourhood community officials must organise programmes regularly to encourage camaraderie. Secondly, building more parks, social gathering places, community centres and children’s playground in the community could be a good measure to let people socialise and get to know each other. This is also helpful for meeting friends, bonding with family and neighbours. As a result, people living in the community would develop a sense of friendship. Positive news and events among community members should be highlighted in the media to eradicate the fear people have about unknown people. Finally, organising different community groups to help people find others with the same interest and to share common passions is a very effective measure to help people enhance their neighbouring bonds and relationship in my opinion.

To sum it up, city life and the overwhelming population should not be hindrances to our sense of community and our relationship with our neighbours. It would be nicer for the community to develop a friendly environment to create a better place to live in with all the neighbours.

Sample 2:

Nowadays, most people have little time to socialize with their neighbours. This happened due to the busy life of individuals which is caused by economic problems they tackle with. This essay cites a few causes and provides some solutions to alleviate this issue.

The main reason for this problem that the public does not know their neighbours is their busy lives. These days, individuals should work hard in order to provide welfare for their families. For example, in a nuclear family, both man and woman might have a nine-to-five job in order to earn high revenue. On the other hand, there are always traffic jams in metropolitans, especially in rush hours. So, employees are stuck in traffic and spend most of their time commuting. As a result, they have no energy to communicate with their neighbours on weekdays, and at the weekends they want to rest and regain their energy to start the week energetically.

However, there are some solutions to make free hours to socialize with each other. Firstly, most countries have some traditional events nations celebrate. People could plan a ceremony to celebrate these special events together. For instance, they could gather in one’s home or if the building has a garden they could meet each other there. In addition, families who have children could let them play with each other and strike a friendship. In this way, the child’s parents meet and get to know others’ parents as well.

In conclusion, economic situations and bustling lives are causing society to have less time to know the next-door families. But there are some suggested ways to rectify it, such as celebrating traditional events together or by allowing their children to strike up a friendship.

Sample 3:

People living in cities have lost their sense of communication most likely as a result of their busy schedules. They usually wake up early in the morning to get to the office and return late at night. This is a very common practice now a days. Due to this, they are unable to even communicate nor say a simple "Hi" to their neighbors. In fact, they only get a limited amount of time to interact with family members, so they prefer to spend the weekend with them. As a result, it's possible that they won't even notice the neighbors.

In addition, a widespread trend among people today is a preference for spending time alone and interacting with others on social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook. They probably find this more exciting and interesting than meeting people in their neighborhoods. Another reason why they don't interact as much is that people who move into newly established housing societies come from all over the country. It's hard for these people to step outside of their comfort zones to meet new people. For instance, they might prefer not to see each other because they don't share common interests in politics or food. There are instances where neighbours do not know each other though they have been living in the same building for years. If something happens to a person living in the next flat, we are unaware of it. This can cause serious problems and might have bad implications.

Since it's hard to live alone, having a strong sense of community is important. It can be instilled if residents of a community hold once a week gathering at which they can meet. It can be a religious gathering, similar to Friday prayers for Muslims or Sunday worship at church. To organize get-togethers, society can form a board of elderly people who live in every house and are mostly free. This could take the form of a high tea or dinner which everyone should be required to attend. It is likely that this will make things better.

In conclusion, men become unsocial for a variety of reasons, which can be controlled. If not controlled, the rate of isolation will rise alarmingly, which has serious health effects.

Sample 4:

It is widely believed that a greater percentage of people are unaware of their neighbors. As a result, the term "togetherness" does not apply in today's world. There are multiple factors contributing to this development but the most important is lack of community sense. We will also discuss a few solutions to the problem in this essay.

Firstly, it depends more on the area which a person is living in. It might be suburban or urban areas. In the suburban areas, the majority of crimes are committed in the districts that are further away or are isolated. Since there is no guarantee of safety, the group instinct is more likely to be absent. If we return to the people who live in the city, their daily routines appear to be erratic and busy. This is the main reason for the city people not to communicate with each other. We live a fast lifestyle in the metropolitan cities. Hence, communication becomes impossible due to the lack of time. As a result, we ought to raise the alarm for a few events that might bring everyone in the neighborhood together.

This can start with setting up a cooperative community center where everyone could apply for a specific position. For instance, there is a location in each Russian apartment building that provides particular services. People will need to use their teamwork skills if there is a broken elevator, and they are unhappy with the building's operations. On the other hand, people ought to take care of this problem on their own, as there won't be anyone to report anything suspicious. It is essential to consider making a neighbor your friend as a significant and life-saving act. There might be accidents in the apartment and the neighbours are the first ones to come and help. Authorities will take time to reach the location and hence, the people living around you come first.

In conclusion, it's possible that bringing a sense of unity to the table is not the most significant issue. However, I believe that creating a community centre will help people interact and know each other.

Sample 5:

The substantial climbs of the populace, fast-paced lifestyle, crime rate and dependence on technologies in the metropolitan areas make more individuals unacquainted and unfriendly to their acquaintances. Nevertheless, there are steps which may be taken to resolve this matter.

In the modern technology-dependent age, individuals are mostly occupied with their work. Essential roads in the towns are full of busy people walking quickly to reach their workplace or business. They are even occupied speaking to their office coworkers and relatives over the telephone. As soon as they come home late at night, they watch tv, use the Web or spend some time with relatives. They barely have any opportunity to socialise with neighbors. In certain situations, people do not even understand who resides next door in town locations. These are the regular scenarios from the towns in which social interactions might be seldom viewed as folks do not have an opportunity to socialise and focus on their work or personal interests.

Also, the uncontrolled acceleration of crimes in the urban neighborhood makes people cautious and suspicious about others, particularly with those they meet for the first moment. Thus, inhabitants of towns tend to become isolated as they are scared to mingle due to undeveloped acquaintance. Unlike rural locations, where relatively fewer individuals live collectively, city places are inhabited, and it is not improbable that many tens of thousands of individuals reside in a block.

On the flip side, considering possible steps to enhance a community’s feeling in the area, community officials should organise programmes frequently to promote camaraderie. Second, building more parks, social gathering areas, community centers, and children’s playgrounds in the community might be a significant step to allow people to socialise and understand each other. Because of this, individuals living in the area would create a feeling of friendship. Ultimately, organising distinct community groups to help people locate others with the same interest and discuss common passions is an effective step to help individuals improve their millionaires and connection, in my own opinion.

To sum up, city life and overpowering inhabitants should not be hindrances to our awareness of our connection with our neighbors. It would be simpler for your community to develop a friendly environment to make a much better place to reside in with the neighbours.

Sample 6:

It has been observed that an increasing number of people are unknown to their neighbours. Out of any reasons, technology is one of the reasons, and arranging social events is one of the solutions to make people socialize with their neighbours.

First off, Technology. To elaborate, people work around the clock, and when they get tired, they prefer to use electronic devices to play games and communicate with their near and their ones. Thus, they have fewer interactions physically with their neighbours. For instance, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram entertain individuals. People spend a lot of time seeing the reels and messages instead of visiting them in person. Even they chat or make video calls to avoid going a few steps to meet others.

A lot of things can be done to strengthen the bonding of neighbours. Arranging social events can work well. To explain it, social programs can bring people close to each other. Individuals spare some time to attend those functions when they are invited on such occasions. Even their short presence at these events can give them a chance to be a part of a debate or gossip. They will feel light and would prefer to visit such occasions more and more. To exemplify it, local festivals, marriages, and birthday parties are such memorable periods which can bridge the communication gap. They will be more interested in making their neighbourhood beautiful and upgraded. The regular visits to each other’s homes will make them outspoken.

To conclude, it is clear that technology has made people reserved, and people avoid visiting other’s places just for the sake of entertaining themselves more on it. Besides, arranging social programs is beneficial to mitigate the conversational gap. Individuals would participate in those events and put forward their plans to make their surroundings pleasant.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, most individuals are not introduced to their neighbourhoods. In my opinion, it is happening to a lack of socializing with each other and a busy lifestyle. I will briefly discuss these causes and give some possible solutions in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, in the fast-paced world, people don’t feel able to spend time with their neighbours due to their busier lifestyle. To be more precise, nowadays, people want to earn more money and live luxurious lifestyles; they work long hours and feel tired after their jobs. For instance, in the nuclear family, men and women both work in an office and sometimes they spend most of their time travelling, so they feel less energetic and don’t involve in talking with neighbours. Moreover, people want to relax into their busier life on the weekends. Therefore, they are taking a rest and don’t get to communicate with neighbours.

In addition, sometimes people do not communicate with their next-door due to a lack of social skills. Specifically, many people have extroverted natures; they are not involved in any type of social activities. They do not understand neighbours’ benefits and always close the door when the next-door families try to interact with them. For example, in metropolitan cities, people always close their doors, concentrate on their work, and do not provide interest to talk with others.

However, there are different solutions to tackle this situation. Firstly, people organize social events at the weekends in their society and must involve all members of the buildings. In this way, every weekend, people interact with each other and realize the importance of neighbours. Secondly, since parents give permission to their children to get along with each other and play different games, children must introduce themselves to others and enhance their knowledge by exchanging important notes and experiences, which helps to improve their social skills. Another important thing is that individuals get along with next-door people, which can be useful to share and solve each other’s problems. For example, women always interact with their neighbours, which can be helpful in both good and bad situations. Hence, there are various ways to express feelings about the neighbourhood.

In conclusion, although, in the modern era, people don’t spend their valuable time with neighbours due to complex lifestyles and lack of social skills, however, there are different ways to solve this problem, such as organizing social events and functions which try to must people include and allow to children for playing games with neighbour’s child and exchange things and knowledge.

Sample 8:

In recent years, it has become increasingly common for individuals to be less connected with their immediate neighbors. In my opinion, this is largely a result of a more insular society and can be somewhat alleviated through initiatives that encourage more community interaction.

The main reason that many residents today do not often speak with their neighbors is that the world is more physically isolated. In past generations, people were more in the habit of going outside and occupying their time by talking with those living nearby. Today, the rise of technology allows the average person to do a variety of activities online including talking with friends, watching movies, playing computer games, and listening to music. These habits now occupy the vast majority of a person’s time and there is no longer a need to interact with one’s neighbor out of boredom or a feeling of connection.

This modern tendency can be countered by more communal activities. Since there is no reversing technological advancement, it must be countered through proactive measures. An example of this would be a local government organizing a festival or musical performance in a park. Neighbors who meet at such events are likely to form connections and thereafter remain in contact as either casual acquaintances or actual friends. If governments are unwilling to undertake such initiatives, then local citizens can also organize various events. The result over time will be a gradual thawing of relations between neighbors.

In conclusion, the way people live today leads to less interaction with one’s neighbors and this phenomenon can be mitigated with more community events. If nothing is done, society will only become more fractured and alienating.

Sample 9:

It is vastly believed that a larger number of people are not aware of their neighbours. Consequently, in this situation, the term of togetherness is not applicable at all. Regardless, the lack of community sense may be identified by a series of reasons, that will be illustrated below. Additionally, this essay is going to cover a few solutions to tackle a problem.

First and foremost, it might be dependent on whether the issue is related to either suburban or urban areas. Speaking of the former, according to the common and biased statistics, the majority of crimes are committed in the furthest districts. Therefore, the group instinct is more likely to be absent, as long as there is no security guarantee. Referring back to the city inhabitants, their daily regimen appears to be unstable, and that would be a good example to highlight the issue. Compared to the rural cooperations, where the families are striving to live a relaxed life, the metropolitan areas are the hastiest. Hence, we should ring the alarm for some activities that could bring all the neighbourhood together.

On the one hand, the best solution might be establishing a cooperative community centre, where everyone would be able to get a certain position. For instance, in each Russian block of flats there is a place, which provides for particular services. If there is a broken elevator and people are unsatisfied with the building's operations, they will have to address to their teamwork abilities. On the other hand, people should take care of this issue themselves, otherwise, there will be no one to call the police if something suspicious happens. Befriending a neighbour must be considered as an important and life-saving act.

In conclusion, bringing the sense of togetherness to the table might not be the most significant trouble. However, if there was one, I would like to stick to the community centre plan, to brighten the neighbours' gloomy days with refreshing activities.

Sample 1:

As the number of senior individuals continues to rise, interest in retirement benefits is increasing as well. Pension is one of the most important advantages of retirement. However, the eligibility age is debatable. Numerous nations have age requirements for obtaining pensions. In spite of this, I believe that age should be more flexible for every individual. Specifically for people whose jobs entail a great deal of physical exercise.

To begin with, every family and individual has a unique life and family plan. Consequently, forcing people to retire at a set age does not seem rational. It should have a fair duration so that people can retire in accordance with their goals. For instance, if the law permits people to get their pension between the ages of 60 and 70, then people can plan their post-retirement life with flexibility and to the greatest extent possible.

Particularly, occupations in the trade, hospitality, and athletics necessitate different physical activities. Due to the characteristics of jobs, it is difficult for workers to continue working past age 65. In other words, it is physically impossible to continue working and earning an income in those jobs when people are old, whereas office employment may be maintained regardless of age. In other words, the age rule must be loosened if certain positions may be filled for reasonable reasons.

In conclusion, it is irrational to have a predetermined age requirement for retirement and pension. Respecting varied life plans and job characteristics, it is possible to have a flexible period, allowing individuals to construct their own retirement plans.

Sample 2:

In some nations, the idea of lowering the retirement age is becoming increasingly popular. Some individuals believe that having an age requirement for employment is absurd. This essay will show why positive discrimination is crucial in such circumstances.

Obviously, it is essential to establish a trustworthy and equitable work environment. Therefore, everyone's current retirement age is the same. Everyone must retire at age 65, notwithstanding the fact that various circumstances apply to older ages. The fundamental issue is the pensions that retired people get. For instance, if a person attains financial independence at the age of 50, others will be able to replicate this position since they will acquire wealth without working or exerting any effort. To guarantee equity, the government obliges that everyone retires at age 65.

However, each individual has their unique difficulties and interests, so this age must be taken into account. Especially as an employee age, health concerns can be a disadvantage. Moreover, in addition to these disadvantages, everyone has their own life goals; therefore, establishing a specific age restricts the freedom of humanity. For instance, many seniors intend to travel the world, see new locations, and experience new cultures. In addition, several of them fantasize about switching careers or launching their own enterprises. In this way, early retirement paradoxically restricts human rights and respect.

In conclusion, this essay argues that workers should determine their own retirement age and that doing so is detrimental to equality. I believe that workers with critical illnesses who are willing to sacrifice their pension for their ambitions should be eligible for early retirement.

Sample 3:

A number of individuals do not comprehend that a fixed retirement age for everyone, regardless of their occupation, is fair. These individuals believe that certain workers should begin their retirement earlier than others. This essay will explain the evidence that some professionals (such as bus drivers and firefighters) should be eligible for early retirement.

Firstly, it is indisputable that a bus driver is under significantly more strain than a person working in an office or a store. This professional has been subjected to the stress of traffic for a number of years, requiring their whole concentration throughout the day without a single blink because they are responsible for a great number of lives during their route. This strain is exemplified by the fact that they have little tolerance for error, although in other pursuits, a mistake may be viewed as part of their development.

Secondly, it is completely unfair for an elderly firefighter (e.g., over 60 years old) to pursue a victim inside a burning building. Despite the fact that a person of this age often possesses extensive job experience, this employment involves vigorous physical activity. In addition, this professional consistently puts their life at risk. Therefore, it is just to provide them with this benefit. However, in certain occupations, it is normal to have an individual around 60 years old. This is represented by a salesperson in a retail store, who is in a safe and secure environment and is not exposed to potentially dangerous situations.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that employees who work in stressful environments should be able to retire and get a pension earlier than the general population.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, various work types stand out in business life, resulting in a range of workloads, some of which are distinct from others. Some contend that having a standard age for retiring for all workers, irrespective of profession, is unjust. This point of view is totally sensible, as some professions related to health and the military field have physically challenging tasks, and their own health is negatively affected while performing these duties.

First of all, job profession types such as military or health service servants make people strenuous and laborious for workload. To put it another way, compelling labor lies behind their own profession. To cite an instance, surgeons confront a set of challenges while they are in operation, and they should be extremely attentive when cutting or sewing any zone in the patient’s body. Therefore, people working in jobs requiring caution should have the right to retire early from their jobs.

Secondly, professions such as military service or the healthcare industry may trigger some health problems. To elaborate in detail, spending time in these types of professions causes some health disorders. To exemplify, staff dealing with the security of our country and are exposed to severe distress conditions for a long time, may suffer from psychological disorders. Therefore, employers should take this problem into account, and authorities should provide deserved retirement, earlier compared to other job branches.

To conclude, the idea that employees should be able to retire and commence receiving a pension earlier based on certain occupations is totally reasonable on the grounds that some professions related to health and the military field entail highly physical labor and may experience negative effects on workers’ health. That governments impose acts associated with early retirement might open an accurate window into employees.

Sample 5:

Many governments set an arbitrary retirement age such as sixty five, but some people are physically worn out or mentally exhausted before they reached this age. While some people believe the set age is reasonable, others think it should be more flexible with exemptions for certain workers. In my opinion, a fixed retirement age is actually best for everybody because it is the easiest and fairest arrangement, but I think a tribunal could be established to decide whether individual workers deserve to receive a pension at an earlier age.

Before the new economy, when most people had a single occupation for life, it would have made a lot of sense to allow some manual laborers or people working in psychologically stressful roles to retire earlier. Today, however, so many people change jobs and shift between industries every few years that it is difficult to make these distinctions.

An ideal middle ground would be to have a set retirement age for everybody, but to create a tribunal that could hear individual cases. A sixty-year-old who had been a miner for forty years could get an early pension, for example, whereas someone of the same age who had spent only eight years mining in his twenties would not.

Two types of workers would benefit from early retirement. First are those who work in tough physically demanding conditions such as construction workers, coal miners and welders. The others are in a high stress position where sound judgement is crucial for public safety. Emergency medical practitioners and air traffic control operators are two such examples.

With people’s working lives differing on an individual basis, it is difficult to classify them into large groups and distribute pensions accordingly. Nevertheless, many individuals still deserve an early pension and in some cases our well-being may depend on giving it to them.

Sample 6:

Fixed retirement age is a hotly debated issue, and people's opinions are often split when it comes to the right age to part from work. When some recommend a fixed retirement age, which, according to them, is a win-win proposition both for employees and employers, others believe in early retirement facilities. I accord with the latter point of view.

It is undeniable that setting different retirement ages for different professions is complex to manage for the government, and it would create discontent among many. That is why a state-wise fixed retirement age is in place in most countries in the world. It not only ensures fairness and equality but maintains the ratio of young and experienced workers' proportion in most sectors.
However, forcing employees to work till a fixed age, like until 65 or 70, is an archaic method that has more demerits than merits. Moreover, letting employees retire early can create job opportunities for fresh-graduates, and this will have a positive impact on the unemployment issue. For instance, many Europeans leave their job before they turn 60, and as a result, youngsters get job opportunities.

Finally, when people are given free will to retire early, they work more enthusiastically and contribute more to the company they work for. They can also contribute to the local economy by setting up small businesses afterwards, which also creates job vacancies. Some retirees travel the world and contribute to tourism industries. So, I believe that professionals like architects, nurses, technicians, politicians, military personnel, journalists and teachers should be given choices to retire early. This way, they could enjoy their free time after a career filled with hard work and can also contribute to the economy and tourism industry.

In conclusion, early retirement options can be beneficial in a tremendous way for the government, employers and employees. It could be a type of appreciation for the great effort of those workers who can fulfil their job objectives pretty accurately during their service years.

Sample 7:

Retirement age is a controversial issue and having a single policy for all professionals is not practical according to many. While some people think that a pre-set retirement age would be helpful both for the government and the citizens, others often disagree. This essay delves into this issue and gives a brief description of what type of workers would benefit from early retirement.

To start with, 65 years as the retirement age seems quite acceptable to many. This is the age when a person becomes physically weak and wants to enjoy life without taking extra pressure on the occupation. Moreover, this ensures that the government can plan the retirement scheme for the retirees properly and does not face any problem in supporting those senior citizens who retired from their jobs.

However, this is not the case in all professions and that is why many disagree with the set departure age. They also say that some professionals should have the freedom to leave their jobs early and enjoy the benefits of early retirements. They express their view on the ground that 65 years is too late and some particular employees who want to enjoy their post-retirement years by travelling or doing something on their own. For instance, many employees dream of traveling to different parts of the world after their retirement and if they wait till 65, it becomes physically more challenging. Moreover, people who are in professions like teaching, politics and research have things to contribute even after they are 60. But this is not the case in many professions, and they should be given the chance to take early retirements and create opportunities for the new. For instance, an IT professional might want to leave a full-time job when he is 45 and start his own company. If he is forced to work in a company till 65, he would never be able to fulfil his dream and a young graduate would not be able to find a job.

Getting back to the question of who would get advantages from early retirement, I think there are many professionals who can do so. First of all, any doctor can retire from his job and start a private clinic to serve more people at a convenient time. Similarly, engineers and technicians can leave their job at around 40 and start their own business, travel the world and get involved in innovative works. I think anyone who has a better plan that continuing their job after 45 should be able to do so.

To conclude, a set evacuation age is helpful for certain mediocre professions but not for the people who have their own dreams and plans. The government should consider letting employees take early retirement to give chances to the fresh graduates and to let the aged people achieve their aspirations.

Sample 8:

The debate on retirement age and whether it should be set keeping in mind the type of role a person is employed in has been a pressing issue. Since the job market is becoming more dynamic by the day, people are more inclined towards having a flexible retirement age. It is widely believed that early retirement is necessary for certain jobs. I wholeheartedly agree with this notion. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on the topic and justify my views on the same.

First and foremost, we must acknowledge that the requirements of a particular profession are distinctly different from another. Some roles are physically demanding, while others need the incumbent to be mentally focused. For example, blue-collar jobs in the fields of manufacturing, installation of machinery, repair and maintenance are manual labour intensive. Thus, the performance of the employees tends to diminish as they get older. Therefore, expecting such individuals to be productive after the age of 60 is unreasonable.

Furthermore, it is not just the unskilled workers who are susceptible to declining productivity due to old age. People tend to lose their physical as well as their mental strength after a certain age. With the rising cases of health complications among the general public, such occurrences are more widespread. The ability to carry out tedious responsibilities that come along with professions like law, accounting and also teaching can also run out as workers get older. Therefore, it is crucial to make sure that such factors are kept in mind when deciding the time for an employee to retire.

However, it is understandable that adopting such a framework will be a strenuous task for the organization, and it might also affect many economically backward families because the individual may be the sole bread-earner. Nevertheless, it is a significant step that needs to be taken for the betterment of both the employers and the personnel.

Finally, an organization must recognize the needs of their workforce. Consequently, to maintain productivity and to create a healthy work culture, certain workers should be allowed to retire early with a decent pension scheme, depending on their physical and mental capabilities.

Sample 9:

Some often argue that it is not fair to set the retirement age of an employee, for example, to 65 years. They also opine certain employees should retire and be given pension at an earlier age. I think the option of retirement should be preferably made based on the individual himself. It seems to me that those who had overstressed during their service need to retire early.

The major reason why I support voluntary retirement is because of the fact that only an employee knows his potential to its best. For example, some prefer to retire early and seek pension because they feel either incapable of pursuing their career, or the external circumstances would not allow them to do so. On the other hand, there are certain employees who are young in their minds, and this reflects in their attitude towards work. I feel such people should be given ample opportunities and time so that the organization can make use of their service to the maximum.

I definitely feel that employees working in certain sectors benefit from an early retirement and pension. Those who had strained their brains and muscles to the extreme, and those who had met tough emotional challenges during work fall in this category. Defense personnel and laborers of mine are pertinent examples of this type of employee.

To conclude, I feel retirement should be made voluntary except in exceptional cases. I also think there would be fewer disputes when an overstressed employee is extended an early retirement and pension.

Sample 10:

The concept of a universal retirement age, such as 65 years, has been a subject of contention, with arguments asserting its inequity across diverse occupations. I concur that certain professions warrant an earlier retirement due to the unique demands they impose on individuals. This essay will explore the rationale behind early retirement for physically demanding and high-stress jobs.

Physically demanding roles, such as construction workers or firefighters, subject individuals to extreme physical stress that can exacerbate health issues over prolonged periods. These professions often involve rigorous physical activity, exposure to hazardous materials, and a significant risk of injury, which can lead to chronic conditions. Consequently, extending the retirement age for these workers not only endangers their health but also compromises the quality of work they are able to deliver. For instance, a comprehensive study revealed that firefighters experience a notably higher rate of cardiovascular diseases compared to the general population, emphatically underscoring the need for them to have the option to retire earlier to mitigate such grave health risks effectively.

Similarly, occupations with high emotional and psychological demands, such as healthcare professionals and educators, warrant consideration for early retirement benefits. These workers endure constant stress, emotional drain, and the potential for burnout due to the intense nature of their duties, which demand high levels of empathy and continuous, thoughtful engagement with individuals' well-being and educational needs. Allowing early retirement offers these dedicated professionals a well-deserved respite and ensures that their sectors remain highly productive with a workforce that is both mentally fit and deeply motivated. For example, numerous teachers who opt for early retirement report significant improvements in their mental health and overall life satisfaction, vividly illustrating the profound benefits and positive impact of implementing such forward-thinking policies.

In conclusion, a one-size-fits-all retirement age neglects the unique demands and risks of certain jobs. Prioritizing early retirement for those in physically strenuous and high-stress roles is crucial for their well-being and the quality of their work, fostering a fairer and healthier society.

Sample 11:

The debate over a universal retirement age has garnered considerable attention, with many advocating for adjustments based on occupational demands. I staunchly support the notion that retirement should not be uniformly dictated but instead tailored to the nature of the work, especially for professions that impose severe physical and mental strains on workers.

Occupations such as healthcare and mining undeniably present unique challenges that justify an earlier retirement age. Healthcare professionals, for example, face relentless stress and irregular hours that can have profound effects on their physical and mental health. The continuous exposure to high-stress environments, coupled with the physical demands of long shifts, often results in burnout. According to a comprehensive study by the American Medical Association, over 40% of healthcare workers experience burnout symptoms before reaching the age of 60, clearly underscoring the need for earlier retirement options to preserve health and maintain quality of care. This preventative approach not only enhances the longevity of healthcare workers’ careers but also ensures they can provide optimal care throughout their tenure.

Similarly, miners work under hazardous conditions that are not only physically demanding but also perilous. The daily risk of accidents in such environments increases with age, as physical agility and sensory acuity typically decline. Research from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health highlights a significant increase in mining accidents involving workers over 55, compared to their younger counterparts. This data compellingly argues for policies that permit these workers to retire earlier, ensuring their safety and well-being. Early retirement for miners would not only reduce the incidence of work-related injuries but also decrease the long-term health costs associated with such high-risk occupations.

In conclusion, tailoring retirement ages to occupational demands is crucial. Professions like healthcare and mining pose significant risks, necessitating earlier retirement to preserve health and safety. Adjusting policies accordingly not only respects workers' contributions but also ensures a more sustainable workforce.

Sample 12:

The circumstances of being retired is an ongoing debate. There is an opinion that profession plays a key role in deciding the age of retirement and some individuals should have a right to retire before others. I completely agree with this statement and in my essay, I will explain the reasons and some kinds of jobs. 

It is obvious that some humans have a more exhausting programme in their business life than others, namely health workers. They have obligatory shifts in order to make a constant treatment for their patients. Additionally, it is mostly impossible to prefer working only during the day. To be more precise, almost everyone has to work in the hospitals even at night while other people sleep. In a survey which was conducted by the Psychology Department of Uludag University between 2022-2023, it was found that working during the day is less stressful than at night and the stress level of some individuals, who work just weekdays and during the day, is lesser. From my view, everyone deserves to have a healthy lifestyle and we should take action for early retirement in order to both encourage people to work in medicine and give health workers a chance to maintain a healthy life.

There should be some arrangements for early retirement for certain jobs such as health workers and miners. As people get older, they lose their concentration to maintain their jobs and this situation may result in accidents. For instance, a nurse who is in her 50s cannot be as effective as a young colleague. So, it is reasonable to make them retire at an early age on behalf of both them and their patients. Additionally, miners need to be careful while doing their risky jobs. However, it is inevitable to make more mistakes with an increased age. 

In conclusion, in my opinion, it is sensible to impose early retirement for some professions such as health workers and miners because of the nature of these jobs and workers’ harsh working conditions. 

Sample 13:

The imposition of a uniform retirement age, typically at 65, has sparked debate over its fairness across different professions. This essay argues that the notion of a fixed retirement age does not account for the diverse demands and risks associated with various occupations, particularly advocating for early retirement for physically intensive and high-stress roles.

Physically intensive occupations, such as those in construction and emergency services, impose a significant toll on workers' physical health. The strenuous nature of these jobs, coupled with exposure to potential hazards and the relentless physical demands, unequivocally demands a reassessment of retirement age policies. For example, research robustly highlights that construction workers are notably prone to musculoskeletal disorders, suggesting a tailored retirement age could significantly prevent long-term health deterioration and enhance quality of life.

Similarly, professions experiencing high levels of emotional and psychological stress, including healthcare workers and teachers, present a compelling case for early retirement considerations. The chronic stress associated with these pivotal roles can precipitate burnout, adversely affecting both performance and mental health, thus undermining the efficacy of the services provided. An illustrative, comprehensive study on healthcare professionals demonstrated a direct, undeniable correlation between job stress and the quality of patient care, reinforcing the argument for allowing these dedicated workers to retire earlier to maintain high service standards and safeguard their well-being.

In conclusion, adhering to a universal retirement age overlooks the specific challenges and health risks inherent in certain professions. Recognizing the need for differentiated retirement ages, especially for jobs that are physically demanding or involve high stress levels, is crucial for protecting workers' health and ensuring the continuation of quality services. Such a policy shift would not only honor the contributions of these workers but also contribute to a more adaptable and compassionate society.

Sample 14:

There is a popular view that a fixed retirement age should not be applicable to everyone, some specific sector workers could be counted as exceptional regarding this age limit rule. I certainly support this idea considering the risk and hostile workplace conditions of some professions. I will elucidate why the key workers like health professionals and construction staffs could be allowed to reap their early retirement benefits.

The value of the working hours varies in accordance with different time, culture, and context. In fact, it goes according to the necessity of a society, and more importantly, it depends on a country’s overall economic structure. Here in Brazil, in the late nineteen fifties, construction workers were highly paid mostly because of the nation´s rapid development. This contrasts with today´s situation in which their income is below the national average. Nevertheless, in both contexts, their retirement age limit has been the same even though the payment and workload are varied.

In addition, we know that some labours have more exposure to riskier work environment, and this should be addressed by the National Providential system. It is ridiculous to put both the comfort office workers and the workers of life-threatening adverse atmosphere in the same basket. This irrational common ground mechanism is a clear reflection of governmental ignorance to the key workers who dedicate their everything at a relatively younger age than the other groups. It includes construction workers, miners, radiologists, and many blue colour workers who are always exposed to health risk and end up with losing work fitness at an early age. Considering this scenario, governments are obliged to support them with early retirement age benefits.

In conclusion, each society has its own values and needs. We must take into account all the labour risk factors as key criteria for setting up the retirement age limit. In fact, a great community is the one that respects individual distinctions and appraises them accordingly.

Sample 15:

Nowadays, superannuation is determined at a pre-defined period by the higher authorities. However, some people believe that fixing the retirement age for every employee, irrespective of their work, is totally an injustice. According to their perspective, certain employees should have a chance to get after-service benefits at their earlier phase. I completely agree with them. This essay will shed light on the reasons behind it in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, there are various factors which support this. Firstly, some workers indulged in tasks which cost them their liberty and freedom to enjoy their time with their family and relatives. Early retirement provides them with the opportunity to utilize that period. For instance, an Army personnel is not able to find time for his personal life due to the tough situations present in the work environment, however, retirement at an early age will enable them to accompany their close ones. Secondly, People suffering from some sort of medical ailments will also get advantages from this scheme as well.

On the other hand, it also benefits myriad people working in various sectors. Primarily, Workers who are serving the nation will get benefit from this scheme. It will enable them to enjoy their life to the fullest. For example, Military personnel, as well as Policemen who perform regular duties, deserve to receive a pension at an earlier stage than others. Additionally, Persons with health-related issues can also be included in the list of persons who are eligible to enjoy this perk.

To conclude I would like to reiterate that government and lawmakers should make policies for the aforesaid categories of workers in order to assure their interests. Therefore, I agree with the above-said question that some employees deserve to retire at an earlier age.

Sample 1:

The energy consumption has been growing dramatically in the past few decades, and to meet the rising demand, seeking energy sources in places far away from human habitats has become conventional. Despite some environmental repercussions, I believe the benefits of this exploration are more significant.

The major advantage of such practice is to ensure the quality of individuals’ daily life and the development of various industries of nations. Undoubtedly, exploiting resources in these remote areas can expand the available pool of resources and thus tackle the energy problem. After all, every aspect of life and production requires energy, ranging from the electricity it produces to the fuels for vehicles or manufacturing equipment. Should people stop exploring new sources of energy, the coming shortage could drive the price to a high level that both people and companies are unable to afford. What comes next might be more severe problems that could threaten the normal function of society.

However, I understand the environmental concerns raised by some people. The mining or drilling activities for fossil fuels as well as the construction of solar farms or wind turbines could pose a threat to the ecological balance in that area, considering the destruction of animal habitats and the pollution caused by hazardous chemicals involved in the process. Nevertheless, these worries should not be overstated as the international community is fully aware of the potential danger and in turn well prepared with relevant resolutions. There are already regulations and laws restricting reckless exploitation at both national and international levels, meaning that the risk and impacts could be meticulously monitored and kept at an acceptable level.

In conclusion, with appropriate preventive actions, the possible environmental consequences of seeking energy sources in remote areas could be alleviated. Therefore, I am convinced that this practice has more advantages than disadvantages.

Sample 2:

In today's globe, it is evident that a great number of energy resources, such as oil and natural gas, are in high demand. As a result, drilling for these resources has become an important source of income for individuals all over the world. At the same time, this phenomenon has put additional strain on the global ecosystem. As a result, I am certain that the drawbacks of this phenomena exceed the benefits.

It is undeniable that the exploitation of natural resources such as oil and gas has several benefits, such as the industrial revolution, which will also assist residents find jobs. Oil has a high energy density and is readily available to create numerous types of energy. Furthermore, drilling for oil from the earth generates greater fuel supply. As a consequence, gasoline prices are reduced. Overall, these natural resources contribute to the country's economic growth and long-term development.
The major problem of exploiting these resources is that they will significantly harm the ecosystem. Furthermore, the extraction of natural resources has negative environmental consequences such as global warming and climate change. Excessive usage of fossil fuels, oil and gas extraction cause a rise in global temperatures that affects green spaces. As a result, exploitation of green areas and drilling for natural resources will endanger humanity as more and more illnesses spread faster, hurting human health. As a result of human activity, the environment will be disrupted.

To restate, while the extraction of natural resources has some advantages, it also has a number of disadvantages for the environment that exceed the advantages. As a result, in my opinion, mankind should cease exploring unexplored countries for natural resources and instead look for alternate sources.

Sample 3:

With the recent advancement in technology, the world is seeing unprecedented growth in the demand for oil and gas. Though it is a direct effect of growing consumerism, capitalism, and manufacturing and developmental spheres. These are the new measures of uplifting the quality of life to be stated in easier terms. Though this method is not backed by certain groups of people, it has an uncanny way of escalating the lifestyle standard. Oil and gas are both used for the warming of houses, viable uses of cars, aircraft and also functioning of products.

The standard of living of people has significantly increased due to the vast presence of the supplies. Moreover, people have been trying to shift to remote places only to have access to natural resources at lower costs. No matter how advanced the method is, we can never absolutely affirm the fact that it causes big destruction to the environment. The demand for oil and gas directly sabotages the ecosystem. It causes catastrophic changes in untouched and evergreen places. Let us take, for example, the North Pole, a dwelling of lively penguins, polar bears, and also massive glaciers, and more distinctive species. This is a place that other nations have been eyeing but a single mistake of oil spillage would demolish the whole ecosystem. Since these are sheer unique creatures, protecting them tends to be the utmost priority for everybody across the globe. In fact, the excessive use of gasses and oil results in an immense level of pollutants, and also vehicle usages. Extending the usage of oil and gas is not going to be a helpful solution for the environment. Greenhouse gasses are emitted into the air and that is becoming a risk factor for you. What should be the concern right now is searching for environmentally friendly energy sources. Usage of solar energy for generating power vehicles is a good way to proceed. Hence, the disadvantages can be considered to be higher than advantages. People need to focus on using energy efficient resources which are renewable like solar or wind energy. 

Sample 4:

In today’s time when there is a boundless increase in the transport system, industrial growth, and population, there is a simultaneous increase in consumers, globalization, and industrialization. This growth trend has resulted in the depletion of natural resources, and concurrent demolition of gas and oil. The growth increased so much that the demand for oil and gas is immensely increasing. Therefore, amassing gas and oil from untouched or unscathed places has been concluded as an option.

This decision, no matter how productive would make the present world’s civilization advanced, would impose a traumatizing threat on the ecosystem. It may be identified that many countries have been trying to shift their focus from oil and natural gas to electricity produced from renewable sources. For instance, electric vehicles have come into the market and has been increasingly reducing the pollution concentration in the environment. However, many consider the shift to remote areas as essential to make use of the natural oil and gas. There are only a handful of remote areas left behind on Earth, and attacking those just to feed the avaricious demands of human beings is not worth it. But a prominent factor to consider about the gas and oil demand is, an abundance of people is employed because of these industries. If restrained, they are going to face immense trouble in finding new places to earn their livelihood. If there is a reduction in production, there will also be fewer people earning. The companies when earning a restrained amount will deprive the economy of getting enough revenues. A proper way to gear both the production and ensure the safety of the ecosystem is not uncovering the untouched areas. However, overutilisation of the natural non-renewable resources would eventually result in its scarcity hence, disadvantages are more than advantages. 

Sample 5:

Irrefutably, as more and more nations undertake the process of industrialization and modernization, there will be a corresponding increase in demand for fossil fuels like natural
gas and oil. To satisfy this need, exploration of previously unexplored regions is being considered. That being said, I don't think this is the best way to solve the problem.

Such a tactic does have its advantages. The first is that people everywhere, but especially in less developed regions, want to raise their standard of living, and fuels like oil and gas make that possible by powering things like machinery, vehicles, and factories. All of them contribute to improved quality of life, but they are finite, therefore we need to find replacements. Additionally, there is the risk that we will damage or destroy otherwise stunning natural areas. Any drilling or other extraction processes on precious land would be detrimental to the ecosystem, but spills in particular would have a devastating effect on the natural world.

Furthermore, we should no longer pursue such kinds of energy due to health concerns and global warming. It's clear that the widespread use of these fuels has harmed the environment and the health of residents in cities where automobile use is concentrated. Consequently, carbon dioxide is being released into the air, which could eventually prove fatal to all life on Earth. Consequently, we need to prioritize renewable sources of energy like wind and solar to power homes and vehicles.

To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that discovering new oil and gas reserves will help us maintain and even raise our quality of living, but it will also cause irreparable devastation to the local ecosystems, not to mention the ongoing detriment to our own health and the planet.

Sample 6:

The demand for fossil fuels around the world keeps climbing. Those who think rural regions should be mined for fossil fuels utilize this argument to support their position. Threatening animals and depleting natural resources are the downsides, but it could help with fuel shortages and the economy.

One way to deal with the oil and gas crisis is to develop the undeveloped regions where there may be more of these resources. The growth of cities has led to a rise in demand for fuel to power factories and transportation, yet current resources are inadequate. Therefore, it's essential to seek out alternative resources. For instance, Congo and other economically underdeveloped regions can benefit much from such exploitation. Nonetheless, there are still numerous regions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo that is unexplored and rich in resources, from which a lot of valuable possessions can be mined.

The loss of native plant and animal life is one of its major drawbacks. The areas where fossil fuels are mined take up a lot of space, and the byproducts of the process, such as heat and smoke, make it difficult for local wildlife to thrive. The second disadvantage is that this method leads to the rapid depletion of natural resources. That is, it takes thousands of years for oil and gas to form, and if we exploit even the most remote locations, we will run out of resources in only a few short years.

Finally, the economic and resource benefits from offshore oil and gas development outweigh the potential environmental costs. While it's true that we need a lot of energy on a regular basis, there must be stringent standards in place to save the environment and cut back on our reliance on fossil fuels.

Sample 7:

In this contemporary world, many people think that it is okay to keep penetrating environmentally sensitive areas because they need fossil fuels to power their cars and homes. The benefits of this alone, in my opinion, are sufficient to justify its growth.

However, there are a number of drawbacks, and all of them have to do with protecting the environment. Firstly, there have been instances of severe oil spills that have contaminated previously unspoiled nature preserves. Second, when the planet is facing a potentially catastrophic confrontation with the repercussions of climate change, it is not the time to promote the exploitation of fossil fuels in any form. The last unspoiled regions of Earth should be left alone and not eaten greedily to sustain a situation that is only becoming worse by the day.

In contrast, economically and in terms of safety, drilling for oil and gas in less populated places has its advantages. Oil and gas are vital to the economies of many countries, especially those still on the rise. Businesses in these sectors would suffer a direct hit without their revenue, and the whole economy would feel the effects through lower tax revenues and fewer jobs. The oil and gas industry will continue to operate, but drilling near homes poses a risk to local residents, especially when using more hazardous methods like fracking. Because of the dangers of oil spills and increased air pollution, infiltrating is restricted to areas far from populated areas.

To summarise, the benefits to the economy and the people do not outweigh the threats to the environment from offshore oil and gas extraction. Protocols to safeguard the environment are necessary, but they must be weighed against the value placed on nature by humans.

Sample 8:

Many today believe that growing demand for fossil fuels justifies the continued exploitation of remote natural landscapes. In my opinion, the advantages of this are enough to warrant its expansion.

The disadvantages all relate to environmental conservation. Firstly, there have been cases of disastrous oil spills spoiling untouched natural preserves. This occurred more than a decage ago in an isolated part of Alaska and resulted in the deaths of thousands of rare species and long-lasting damage to the ecosystem. Secondly, fossil fuel exploitation in general should not be encouraged at a time when the Earth is facing a potentially cataclysmic reckoning with the effects of climate change. The last untouched areas of the planet should be left in peace and not greedily consumed to feed a problem that is growing more dangerous daily.

On the other hand, the advantages of drilling for oil and gas in less populated regions relate to economics and safety. Many countries, particularly developing ones, are reliant on oil and gas to prop up their economies. Losing the revenue from these industries would not only affect the companies themselves but they would pay fewer taxes and employ fewer people, who would then contribute less to the consumer economy. The second justification is safety. Companies will continue to drill for oil and gas but if they do it in residential areas there is the potential for human contamination, especially when it comes to more dangerous practices such as fracking. By limiting drilling to remote regions, the human population is safely protected from the risk of spills and increased air pollution.

In conclusion, the environmental risks do not outweigh the benefits to the economy and the citizenry that accrue from remote oil and gas exploitation. There should be protocols to protect the environment, but these must be balanced against humanity’s precedence over nature.

Sample 9:

It has been observed that the need for fossil fuels such as gas and oil is growing, and to meet this need, it has become mandatory to ascertain other sources in developed regions. I believe that the disadvantages are greater than the benefits of exploring other sources in rustic areas as it will destroy the natural scenery of that place as well as global warming will increase.

First off, drilling at such above-mentioned places will destroy the natural beauty of the place. To elaborate, when a place is selected to explore to find energy resources, a lot of digging is done with the assistance of machines or tools. A lot of trees have been cut down, which has been the shelter for many bird species. Resultantly, the place loses its beauty, and it cannot be again as productive as it was before the excavation. For instance, earlier people used to build their farmhouses in the countryside areas to enjoy some holidays or live in those places after retirement. Now they have postponed their plans due to barren land or lack of greenery. So, this step will put humanity and fauna at risk.

On the other hand, if these places are dug, it will undoubtedly create employment opportunities. To explain it, a larger workforce is needed, and individuals can get better facilities and they can raise their living standards. And also, skilled professionals from other nations can be hired, which will strengthen a country’s relations with other nations, and it will generate another source of income for a country. In this way, a country can be economically sound but by putting the environment at risk. To exemplify it, excavation in remote areas brings profit to a country or its people. People enjoy a lavish lifestyle, but they will be living in a world that is full of pollution and lack of green spaces.

To conclude, it is clear that the disadvantages are more as people will not be able to enjoy nature and the places where digging is done will lose their beautiful scenery. Although people enjoy a lofty lifestyle, they will do it at the cost of putting their biodiversity at risk.

Sample 10:

Many nations depend on oil and gas for various reasons, such as providing light, fueling cars, and preparing meals. Therefore, the demand for gas and oil is high, so finding new sources in secluded and new areas is important. The advantages could be that it would help in the development of the area and improve the revenue of the country.

Foremost, opening up a remote area due to the demand for oil production will help in developing the area. Governing bodies that regulate production also help in employing the local people in the community, which would directly increase the employment of people. Once companies notice a direct need for services such as restaurants and stores, they would tend to relocate to the area. For example, in Nigeria, precisely the delta state, the rural areas are now developed due to the opening of refineries.

Furthermore, another of the pros is the improvement of revenue generated by the country. Countries are established on the amount of revenue generated. This would help in putting it into sectors that need more funding. For instance, Arab countries are well known for their natural resources in oil production. This has further enabled their countries to give free access to education and health care.

In conclusion, the pros outweigh the cons because opening up these new areas due to high demand would bring about the advancement of the area and skyrocket the revenues generated.

Sample 1:

Global deforestation is currently on the rise, which has numerous negative impacts on both the ecosystem and the habitats of various animals. Therefore, it is crucial to implement a number of preservation measures instantaneously in order to safeguard the earth’s lungs and environmental wellbeing, which would be subjected to careful discussion during the course of this essay.

To begin with, the development of a country may profit greatly from the timber industry. Nevertheless, each nation’s government must enact stringent logging rules to prevent the exploitation of wood in order to promote sustainable growth and preserve the ecosystems and biodiversity. To increase adherence to forest protection rules, harsher penalties should be applied for unauthorised logging and forest devastation.

In terms of society, substantial education about the value of forests is required, along with public awareness-raising initiatives for environmental issues. From an early age, individuals need to be instructed to respect the natural environment and the important role that forests play on the planet. Furthermore, communities should develop a sense of obligation to protect forests as a result, and initiatives for forest conservation would garner widespread support in addition to increased application. Last but not least, reusing wood-based products including paper, packaging, crates, furniture, and timber is one of the most practical and effective actions that everyone can take. Additionally recyclable, these goods significantly lower the amount of wood consumed.

Finally, every region of the world should take responsibility for preventing deforestation with a combination of solutions since forests are a splendid privilege to the planet that helps to sustain biodiversity and environmental well-being.

Sample 2:

Trees, from all over the world, are continuing to be reduced by mankind, with many serious perils to our nature and people should not connive at this deforestation. We need oxygen for our survival and trees provide us with this most important element for our living. Immediate individual and governmental steps should be taken to save our most trusted friends, trees.
Forests are the essential source of oxygen and trees encourages the soil and keep the ground from erosion. Furthermore, forests are habitats of a lot of animals and are home to myriad insects. People should take these aspects of forests into account and reform some regulations. The government should be stricter to control the unauthorised chop down activities. Namely, Amazon rainforest has been felled and used commercially and has already caused a huge damage to the wildlife and the environment. Consequently, proper legislations are very vital for preventing deforestation. In addition to legislations informing people might help to slow down saw down of forests.

In spite of the legislations are oppose to people who remove trees, people will not perceive how perilous these actions are and they will continue to cut trees without realising the danger. Due to their benefit from trade, the most efficient way to prevent deforestation is to inform people. For instance, governments might make some advertisement to show on the TVs and also on the roads. Furthermore, doing some interviews by experts in the news may be another solution.

More forest securities should be in place to prevent people from cutting down trees. Logging should be banned in areas where the percentage or forest is low and alternative ways of cooking should be introduced. Finally artificial and metal furniture should be used instead of using woods.  
To sum up, in spite of the vital roles’ forests play in our life people do not stop cutting down trees and use them for luxury. In this case, governments should reform legislations and inform people about logging danger. Without information people deforestation will continue for commercial use and array of animals and insects will get extended and we will endanger our mother planet.

Sample 3:

Deforestation, which is the result of human’s abuse and luxury to the nature, is spreading out all over the world, with strict impacts for our environment. For avoiding this problem in my opinion some precautions and proper laws should be taken, such as forbidding logging and putting marks on the areas of trees.

Under the control of the government, law enforcers should arrest people who log trees without any permission. By this way illegal logging can be prevented if sufficient attention is directed to this area. However, another issue still exists, legal deforestation. From my point of view the biggest error is occurring by federal systems. Because when a government wants to build up an infrastructure there is no other government to criticize it and warn it to not make a wrong choice.

By logging many trees and destroying lungs of the earth forests to raise a huge building, it may be to country’s profit, nonetheless, is not a good idea for both ecology and human relief at all. Therefore, that job remains to the government itself to judge and check benefits of work it has done. Probably legal deforestation can be prevented in that way.

To sum up, in spite of the fact that people and governments have both decided some wrong choices to take trees and put houses, factories and other buildings instead of those trees they can still correct their mistakes. By increasing the number of trees grown and by decreasing the number of trees logged humanity can gain a lot more oxygen to breathe.

Sample 4:

Human activities are responsible for deforestation around the globe, which leads to serious influences on their living environment. From my perspective, I believe this problem could be reduced by applying three possible solutions including sustainable logging policies, afforestation and enforcing financial punishments.

Firstly, in order to mitigate deforestation, we could promote sustainable logging practices, such as selective logging and reduced-impact logging, reducing the environmental impact of timber extraction. In particular, sustainable logging ensures that only mature trees are harvested, leaving younger trees to continue absorbing carbon dioxide and supporting the ecosystem. Indeed, almost all the European logging companies, such as Poland's timber, have applied this scheme to meet their productivity and limit deforestation. As a result, by maintaining a careful balance between timber production and forest conservation, we can mitigate the adverse effects of deforestation.

Secondly, reforestation and afforestation initiatives are critical steps in combating deforestation. Initially, reforestation involves replanting trees in areas that have been previously deforested, helping to restore the ecological balance and biodiversity. Afforestation, on the other hand, focuses on planting trees in areas that were not previously forested. Therefore, both approaches contribute to carbon sequestration, soil protection, and the preservation of vital habitats. For example, some reports by the United Nations have shown that these methods have improved the total forest areas in Brazil to 500 million square kilometres in 2012. Consequently, these efforts not only replenish lost forests but also create new green spaces that benefit the environment and society.

Thirdly, Effective government regulations and their rigorous enforcement play a central role in curbing deforestation. In other words, governments must establish clear laws and policies aimed at protecting forests and preventing illegal logging. In further explanation, enacting more financial penalties or even imprisonment for those involved in unlawful activities, including illegal logging and land clearance, could help intended logging criminals consider the benefits and consequences. As a consequence, this will reduce the numerous of illegal logging because these criminals worry about imprisonment sentences if they are caught by police officers.

To conclude, to mitigate this issue, we could encompass these methods to achieve the most effective performance: sustainable logging practices, reforestation and stricter punishment for illegal logging.

Sample 5:

Since many years ago, people have been logging and destroying forests in myriad zones of nature. In order to prevent such damage to the environment, I believe by deploying some approaches such as recycling wooden materials or utilising other resources instead of wood we can overcome this challenge.

There are several methods to lessen the usage of wood and consequently deforestation. For instance, by recycling the papers which are filled and useless, we will be enabled to intercept destructing the vegetation. Indeed, individuals can re-use the papers at various times. Moreover, recycling not only prevents obliterating the forest but also avoids extra payments of production. To illustrate this, the price of recycled paper is cheaper than the fresh ones. Hence, forests will not vanish, and the prices would be decreased.

On the other hand, deforestation can be inhibited by replacing other resources instead of wood. In fact, humans can fulfil their needs with other materials instead of wooden ones. For example, people can construct their houses and villas with cement and bricks or metals instead of wood. Although woods have specific features in some parts of the constructions, they can be replaced by special plastic. In another instance, to avoid dangerous annihilation to nature, authorities should encourage students to benefit from online books instead of physical and paper ones. Thus, the rate of felling trees will be deducted significantly.

In conclusion, forest eradication has detrimental effects on the environment, which can be avoided by modifications in consuming and changing the primary materials of our products and buildings.

Sample 6:

In this contemporary world, some people are cutting down an array of trees only for their own profit. The removal of a large number of trees has a tremendous negative impact on our environment and it causes myriad issues such as soil erosion, flood, drought, heatwaves, acid rain etc. In this essay, I will depict the reasons and examples.

On the one hand, logging deteriorates day by day in the whole world and it damages our ecosystem. Wood has been used since the ancient period for furnishing the room as well as a pillar of a house and because of this people cut trees randomly and destroy terrestrial and aquatic animals. For example, a research group in Chicago found that more than 70% of animals live in trees and they have continued a food chain with other animals which are living in the water. As a result, they lost their house and die off easily which affects our biodiversity. To regulate this situation; government should take proper steps or imposed a ban on cutting down trees.

On the other hand, trees are used as a fuel or to produce coal so, many people have cut down trees which enhance our environment pollution. Trees work as a defender to defend our natural area from pollution. For instance, trees play a significant role in breaking soil erosion and water pollution. Deforestation has vanished the stability of soil and it erodes the soil from the shore of the river which is also polluting the water. At the same time, land has become barren for the erosion of soil, and it harms our agriculture. People need to be aware of this problem which is occurring for felling trees, and they might promise to plant two trees if they cut one.

In conclusion, nowadays, the whole world gets worse environmentally because of deforestation. However, we need to be more conscious to regulate the cut-down trees and must help the government to mitigate this problem and to save the world.

Sample 7:

Like humans, the earth has a green lung that is the forest. Logging is all the time a sensational subject in many countries of the world. However, all of us have no true behaviour towards the surrounding environment. In this topic, I will highlight the importance of forests, and also divide a few directions to defend against deforestation.

Firstly, as far as I noticed that vegetation has played a vital role in our life. Trees have brought us fresh air that is polluted in this developing period. Cutting down trees keeps pollutants airborne, where they can mix with water vapour and form acid rain. All of that is necessary aware since studying in schools. Teachers direct students' attention to the importance of the environment. Furthermore, we are capable of educating our children about this global topic thereby reading newspapers, watching movies, ...

On the other hand, the government needs to have an appropriate punishment for those who destroy the forests. For instance, loggers will be fined with money or worse, sent to prison. This makes forest robbers understand their actions, as well as decrease the number of people who have a purpose to harm the environment.

In addition to that, factories should prevent pollutants to the air. Similarly, we should use more public transport, because emissions, from motorbikes and cars, have warmed up the earth. This leads to the death of the forest due to global warming.

To summarize, therefore, it is no exaggeration to recognize that forests are essential to our survival and livelihood. Absolutely, we have difficulty living healthy with the air pollution. Now is the time for each individual to change behaviour to protect our forest.

Sample 8:

In addressing the critical issue of deforestation caused by human activity, several effective solutions can be implemented to mitigate its adverse environmental impacts.

Firstly, stringent government regulations and enforcement mechanisms should be established to curb unsustainable logging practices and illegal deforestation activities. Legislation imposing penalties on those who engage in unauthorized deforestation can serve as a deterrent and encourage compliance with sustainable forestry practices. For instance, countries like Brazil have implemented laws and established protected areas to combat rampant deforestation in the Amazon rainforest.

Moreover, promoting reforestation and afforestation initiatives is essential to restore degraded ecosystems and offset the loss of forest cover. Encouraging communities, businesses, and governments to participate in tree planting campaigns can help replenish forest resources and enhance biodiversity. For example, initiatives such as the Billion Tree Campaign initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme have mobilized global efforts to plant trees and restore forest landscapes.

Furthermore, raising public awareness and fostering education about the importance of forests in mitigating climate change and preserving biodiversity are crucial steps in combating deforestation. Educational programs and campaigns can inform individuals about the ecological significance of forests and empower them to make informed choices that contribute to conservation efforts. Organizations like WWF and Greenpeace actively engage in advocacy and educational initiatives to raise awareness about the consequences of deforestation and promote sustainable land management practices.

In conclusion, addressing deforestation caused by human activity requires a multifaceted approach involving policy interventions, community engagement, and public awareness initiatives. By implementing robust regulations, promoting reforestation efforts, and educating the public about the value of forests, we can work towards preserving these vital ecosystems for future generations.

Sample 1:

If a murderer is given the death penalty, then everyone in society is also guilty of the crime. The issue if a jail term is preferable to the death penalty or not has been raised by this scenario in society. Individually, I believe that life in jail without the possibility of parole is the best, most rational, and most moral method to cope with murderers.3

There is no simple explanation for why people kill, thus a single act motivated by a number of circumstances should not be used to decide whether or not someone else's life should be taken. Among the most severe things a person can do is kill another person, it's not just a matter of coming up with a plan and carrying it out like most other chores are, rather, there's an internal battle going on between the killer's emotions and thoughts. As a result, basing a person's fate on their conduct of the past is unethical and should be eliminated.

It would be a contradiction to kill the person who committed the crime. When a person is condemned to die by the legal system, which is comprised of individuals chosen by society, the general population unwittingly takes on the role of the murderer. Nobody ought to have to shoulder the guilt for the repercussions of actions they did not take or cause. In addition, the cash that is used for the court system comes from the general public. As a result, not only the judgment but also the money is taken to carry out an activity that the majority of people would consider immoral.

In the end, putting murderers to death as a punishment is not an ethical choice. As a culture, people must work together to fix this unfair system and create our community a safer place for us and the next generation.

Sample 2:

Society has an obligation to look out for its members' safety. One such method is reducing the severity of punishments for criminals and murderers. Instead of executing them, many people think it would be better to put them in prison. Even though it's unlikely they'll ever be able to conduct crimes again, some people believe it's preferable to terminate their lives anyhow. This is why, among others, I believe that a life sentence in prison is the most appropriate penalty for murder.

In today's world, there are a variety of methods for committing crimes, as well as a growing population explosion. In addition, administrations in emerging areas have tough rules about illegal acts. They make an effort to determine who the actual culprit is and punish them accordingly. In point of fact, they are looking for more people to make sure it is the end of every wrongdoing, and they do not wish to get those people another chance. In addition, they are of the opinion that there is insufficient room for all the killers.

On the other side, the vast majority of people are of the opinion that offenders should spend their time behind bars as the most appropriate form of punishment. They are also able to modify their beliefs, and they can make up for their wrongdoing by participating in acts of kindness and charity. They also bring up another problem, which is the possibility that the justice system can fail to identify actual criminals or make an error about the severity of their sentence.

In conclusion, I agree with this statement because of all the reasons I gave above. We can give all criminals, even murderers, a chance to think about what they did and feel bad about it. They can also try to make up for their mistakes.

Sample 3:

Today's globe has steadily increased crime rates. There are many people who believe that the death penalty is akin to murder. They favor a receptive judicial system instead. Canceling the death penalty is a controversial proposal that I do not support. And this is because sending a strong message to would-be murderers by punishing them is important, and it is wasteful to put people who cannot be rehabilitated into public prisons, where they will use public resources forever.

To begin, a sentence of life in jail is an unnecessary use of the money provided by the taxpayers. It is common knowledge that the administration of correctional facilities comes at a high expense. As a consequence of this, it is a waste to put money into murderers who will never be allowed to rejoin society after serving their sentences.

Moreover, there is no other way that is as successful as the death sentence in preventing people from engaging in criminal behavior. In other words, by not showing pity to those who have committed murder, we demonstrate that the life of any human being is valuable, and as a result, we deter other criminals from committing any kind of murder.

In conclusion, there are more important ways to spend tax dollars than on murderers and rapists, and the death penalty has been proven to be highly successful at discouraging violent criminals. In my opinion, we are not making the correct choice by abolishing the death penalty. More nations are expected to reevaluate their use of the death penalty in the future in light of this research.

Sample 4:

Nowadays human life is being protected under the law of justice. Some people prefer that life in prison after committing a murder, while others think that the death penalty should be executed as soon as possible. In my opinion, I disagree that the death penalty should be forbidden, and, in this essay, I would explain my latter view.

Firstly, it is wasting the resources that are provided by the government. As there would be a burden for people to pay taxes in order to keep on the maintenance. For example, those criminals who live in prison are allowed to use the facilities of prison as long as they could. These seemed like living in isolated places where a daily basis is provided without paying. Although they do have some duty work, it was just some simple tasks. So, the resources required would rise as the population of the life-sentenced in prison forever increase.

Besides that, responsibility seems relatively untrustworthy by just being life in prison after a precious life is being ended. There might be some people who plan to kill. For instance, they could hire to kill and search for a scapegoat. Also, if the scapegoat has well behaved as time passed, they may reward with a release as an exception. While the mastermind had gotten away flawlessly and still committed a crime. In the end, they will not admit it and won't realise their mistake. These endanger the community and may cause future sequela.

In conclusion, besides the usage of resources could be better in other domains, but also lack of responsibility after a crime will do harm in the future. In my view, the death penalty should be preserved in order to manage the order publicity and prevent the life lost.

Sample 5:

Several individuals are of the opinion that criminals must not be hanged because the death penalty is also a criminal offence. They suggest life in prison to be a better option for the law offenders. I strongly agree with the assertion that criminals must not be killed. The essay below will discuss this view at length.

First and foremost, some prisoners are wrongly accused of crimes they did not commit. Therefore, hanging an innocent soul because of court injustice is unfair. That is why I support that criminals must not face the death penalty. For instance, in 2015 the Zimbabwe high court had a case of a twin brother confessing to having killed their mother, while the other twin was wrongly arrested and had already served one year in jail awaiting to be hanged. In such a case the first twin was going to die without justice being served.

Furthermore, the jail has become a rehabilitation centre for some convicts. Therefore, the death penalty means there is no time to repent and change their ways. Hence, I agree that those in jail should not be hanged but rather spend the rest of their lives in prison. For example, there is a television program in South Africa where they interview prisoners. Almost 90% of the convicts show remorse towards their actions and mostly ask for forgiveness from the people they wronged. If such prisoners were killed, then they would not get time to confess and ask for pardon.

In conclusion, the essay above agreed that criminals must not be given the death penalty, it is better for them to spend the rest of their lives in prison. This is because there are innocent people in jails who are convicted for crimes they did not commit, and prison sometimes changes the convict's character. These and other issues were discussed in the essay above.

Sample 1:

The debate regarding the significance of physical education in a child's academic curriculum continues to evoke divergent opinions. This essay will attempt to explore both perspectives, albeit firmly advocating that physical education classes constitute an indispensable component of a child's holistic education.

Proponents of prioritizing academics over physical education argue that focusing solely on intellectual development during school hours enhances cognitive abilities and academic performance and ensures that school time is best utilized. They contend that rigorous academic instruction facilitates intellectual stimulation, thereby fostering critical thinking and knowledge acquisition. For instance, countries with a strong emphasis on academic achievement often allocate more classroom time to core subjects, believing that this approach better prepares students for academic success.

Conversely, proponents of physical education advocate for a more balanced approach, underscoring the numerous advantages of incorporating physical activities into the curriculum. Engaging in physical education not only promotes physical health but also nurtures essential life skills such as teamwork, discipline, and resilience. For instance, participation in team sports cultivates cooperation and leadership skills, preparing children for real-world challenges beyond the confines of the classroom. Moreover, studies consistently demonstrate a positive correlation between physical activity and academic performance. Physical exercise has been shown to improve cognitive functions, including attention span and memory, ultimately contributing to enhanced academic achievements.

In conclusion, while academic instruction is undeniably crucial, the integration of physical education into a child's educational journey is equally imperative. Physical education classes not only promote a healthy lifestyle but also foster essential life skills and positively impact academic performance. Therefore, it is expected that the school authority would integrate physical education into their school curriculum for young children.

Sample 2:

It is argued by many people that physical education is vital for children and should be introduced into the academic curriculum, yet others deem that children should put emphasis on academic activities during school time. This essay expounds on both viewpoints before coming up with a logical opinion.

To commence with, introducing physical education into the academic curriculum might be an effective approach not only to augment children’s physical activity participation levels but also to improve academic outcomes. On the one hand, physical inactivity causes a range of non-communicable diseases like obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Physical activity, on the other hand, helps to maintain fitness, in turn, increases children’s school engagement and thus improves their cognitive and academic performance. A case in point is Australia. The country enhances the physical activity and literacy levels of children in elementary school by integrating physical education into the academic curriculum.

In contrast, others think that children should devote school time to their studies. According to them, physical literacy can be taught at home, whereas school time needs to be dedicated to acquiring academic knowledge. This is because if physical education is integrated with the curriculum, then one or two major subjects would be compromised accordingly. This, in turn, will hamper overall academic activities.

I believe that schools are not an ideal place for physical education. The reason is that once gymnasiums were rare in a community, but today, every community has a gymnasium for physical education. Therefore, there is no ground for adding physical education to the primary school curriculum.

It seems reasonable to conclude that physical education should not be included in the primary school curriculum because it could handicap the academic process while killing valuable time for learning important lessons.

Sample 3:

The question of whether physical education classes hold significant value in a child’s education or if the academic focus should take precedence during school time has sparked an animated debate. While some argue for the importance of physical education as an integral part of a well-rounded education, others emphasize the primacy of academic pursuits. In my opinion, physical education classes are essential for a child’s holistic development, and striking a balance between academics and physical activity is crucial.

On the one hand, proponents of academic focus argue that the primary goal of education is to equip children with the necessary knowledge and skills for future academic and career success. They emphasize that dedicating more time to core subjects like mathematics, science, and languages maximizes intellectual growth, fosters critical thinking, and enhances problem-solving abilities. Academic achievement is often seen as the primary measure of a child’s success and is crucial in preparing them for higher education and professional opportunities.

On the other hand, advocates for physical education highlight the numerous benefits it offers to a child’s overall well-being. Regular physical activity not only promotes physical fitness but also enhances cognitive function, concentration, and memory retention. Physical education classes provide opportunities for children to develop crucial social skills such as teamwork, cooperation, and leadership. Engaging in sports and physical activities instils values of discipline, resilience, and healthy lifestyle habits from an early age.

Furthermore, integrating physical education into the school curriculum can address the growing concern about sedentary lifestyles and childhood obesity. With the prevalence of technology and sedentary forms of entertainment, physical education classes play a vital role in promoting an active lifestyle and instilling lifelong habits of regular exercise. For example, incorporating physical education classes into the school curriculum ensures that students engage in regular physical activity, reducing the risk of obesity-related health issues.

In conclusion, while academic focus is undeniably important, physical education classes should not be neglected in a child’s education. Incorporating academics with physical activity is essential for well-rounded development, promoting physical fitness, cognitive function, social skills, and a positive attitude towards a healthy lifestyle.

Sample 4:

This is an ongoing discussion regarding the importance of curriculum activities and studies. A group of individuals claims that physical tasks are more crucial in order to improve mental health. On the other hand, some people believe that students should focus on books. Both situations have pros and cons. As far as I am concerned, I would like to hold the former opinion due to some facts.

First of all, I will elaborate on the advantages of focusing on the academic system. Firstly, it is an outstanding way to improve reading skills as well as writing. Secondly, it enhances the knowledge of pupils and gives them the ability to think outside of the box. Thirdly, communication skills can cut the edge of creativity through debates. Last but not least, maturity level grows up quickly. For example, when I cast my mind back, I used to remember that I got the first position in my school by dint of my outraged mentality, which I got through numerous dialogues with a different bunch of learners.

Alternatively, I am going to explain why some people give their vote to other activities instead of studies. Furthermore, they think that children's brains have no capacity to perform work on numerous works. In my opinion and also scientists proved, in childhood kids have the ability to perform multitask and can learn more than one language. Moreover, after school time parents can play games with their children.

In conclusion, due to these facts, I would prefer that in school time students need to focus on learning skills instead of playing games and watching animated movies, which can be available at home time.

Sample 5:

Recently, it has been widely believed that not only knowledge of academics in schools is an important part, but gymnastics classrooms are valuable also, which some have preferred to educational matters. I, in my point of view, am convinced that both are equally needed, and the support will be covered in this essay.

To begin with, focusing on physical education subject will lead to the vital merits of the body to students, which their quality of physical standard will be encouraged. In other words, students’ healthy strength will be improved with exercise lessons in schools both a strong body and good mental health. For example, when their bodies are worked out, the chemical elements in their bodies will be operated, which affects mental health such as the happiness aspect which is a stressful reduction caused by the overload of studying.

Besides, attention to general academic subjects is essential also, which there are important benefits for children’s future. That is to say, some parents feel educational materials will establish wealth, stability and a high salary rate for them. For instance, when they grow up to the appropriate period for college admission, all mandatory subjects must be provided for the national examination. Moreover, all top-ranking universities in this world still have measured students’ ability with GPA and school record, it is undeniable that concentrating on lessons is also significant.

In conclusion, as the aforementioned advantages of both views, I, from my point of view, consider that although P.E. is necessary for well-being, general academic classes are essential for graduation and the occupation process also. Therefore, if individuals are able to balance both matters efficiently, they will be high-quality persons definitely.

Sample 6:

The school system has always been a subject of debate among people. The latest point of contention is the value of physical education classes and if the time should be redirected towards academic endeavours. I believe the importance of PE classes can’t be undervalued and a balance of both views is the way to go.

On the one hand, the main reason for sports class is its health benefits. With today’s, sedentary lifestyle institutions must take it upon themselves to obligate and educate the youth to be more active and healthier. For example, a biweekly PE class. Furthermore, team sports are a tool in which students may acquire and hone multiple traits. Via the participation in a team, activity the students work on their teamwork, leadership and many other skills that are applicable outside of the field. To illustrate, studies show the kids that played a team sport are more successful in their adult life.

On the other hand, the primary goal of the school is scholastic. Kids attend school to learn and for that 100% of their time should be applied to sharpen their minds in ways that may advance them. For instance, the learning of a second language. Additionally, a secondary goal is preparation for college. Nowadays, the competition to be admitted to college is a fierce one, thus time that could be used to improve ASAT skills cannot be wasted. to give an example, the competition for medical universities in Israel is immense and only the best of the best may enter.

In conclusion, although the academic part of the educational system is clear to all, the benefits of sanctioned physical education on the kid's health and mental skills cannot be denied and should be fostered as it will have long-lasting benefits.

Sample 7:

A majority of people have different views about whether physical education is a critical subject, or if students should mainly concentrate on academics at school. In my opinion, I strongly agree with both views as each has its own merits.

On the one hand, it is true that pupils need to learn physical education at school. The main reason is that this kind of activity is important for the students' healthy growth and development. For example, students are required to learn how to play sports such as badminton, basketball or football. By doing so, they would get better health and fit body. Also, physical education classes can help students relieve stress and anxiety and even build their social skills. For instance, students who have a hectic school life are already under pressure so playing with friends or outdoor activities might reduce their stress after academic classes.

On the other hand, focusing on academics is truly beneficial to students in several ways. First of all, pupils can gain knowledge from a variety of fields, in particular, Mathematics, History and Economics, etc. Secondly, students who have excellent academic records might have a better future. As an example, they would have great opportunities to find a well-paid job for life. As far as I'm concerned, spending a little time each day being physically active can help children concentrate well on their school works.

In conclusion, I believe that physical education classes can offer several advantages such as healthy growth, development and mental health. However, there are many good points in focusing on academics during school time in terms of widening children’s knowledge and helping them have a better future.

Sample 8:

The inclusion of physical education in the academic curriculum has always been a hot topic of discussion. Some people hold the view that sports are an essential aspect of the school education system, whereas others have totally different opinions as they believe full emphasis should be given to the studies only. In this essay both the opinions will be discussed.

The group supporting the involvement of physical activities in the school system focuses on students being both physically and mentally fit, along with their educational development. As it is very rightly said that a healthy mind dwells in a healthy body. Similarly, health and games related subjects can definitely help in the overall development of the kids. For instance, a recent study has also shown that children involved in sports have better concentration and grasping power as compared to the ones focusing only on studies. Apart from this, some parents believe that physical education can teach their wards major etiquettes like the sportsman spirit, dedication, teamwork and many more, which can be beneficial in their survival in the practical world.

On the contrary, some parents strongly disagree with the above facts and the emphasis on simply focusing on academics. They think games and physical activities can divert the student’s focus away from the studies. In this world of high competition, long hours of study are demanded to beat others and achieve great ranks. For example, in entrance tests like IIT, AIIMS, NDA and many others, thousands of candidates appear every year and the selection criteria demands one to excel in the exams. Additionally, they believe, to be successful in life and to opt for good carrier, games and sports won’t help, so all the focus should be set in the science and other important subjects in the school.

To conclude, in my opinion, it is rightly said ‘All work and no play can make Jack a dull boy’. So definitely a balance should be maintained in both learning and health. Focusing on a single activity can have detrimental effects on a child’s life.

Sample 9:

Opinions differ as to whether physical education is a critical subject of system education or whether students should concentrate on academics while they study at school. I do think both views are reasonable as each has its own merits.

It is certainly true that students need to learn physical education at school. The main reason why students should learn physical education at school is it is important for their healthy growth and development. For example, the student is required to learn basketball, volleyball, swimming, etc. in this class. As a result, they would have good health and a fit body. Another upside of the physical education class is to help students relieve stress and anxiety. Because school life is hectic for every individual. For instance, the student can play sports or attend many interesting outdoor activities in this class. This might help students relax after stressful academic classes.

Nevertheless, there are several benefits for students to focus on academic classes. Since academic classes widen student’s knowledge in a variety of fields. For example, students can learn how to calculate in mathematics classes, or they can learn about the location, economy, culture of many countries all around the world. Besides, students who learn academic subjects well at school might have a better future. Because they are provided full of the necessary knowledge that need for their future life. And Students achieving high results at school would have opportunities to find a well-paid job.

In conclusion, I believe that there are also many advantages of physical education regarding the healthy growth and development and the decreasing stress and anxiety. However, there are several plus points to concentrate on academics during school time in terms of widening children's knowledge and also helping students have a better future.

Sample 1:

It is argued by many that an individual’s worth today is judged by his socio-economic condition rather than his personal morality and quality. I totally agree with this opinion. This essay will first delineate how people often make instant judgments about others by their clothing choices and belongings and then it will suggest that most celebrities are adored despite lacking moral values demonstrating that material possessions are more important to society.

People are often held in high regard for their elegant clothes, luxurious cars or the latest gadgets. This quite superficial paradigm of thought is prevalent among all segments of society, whether be it how an attendant treats consumers in a restaurant, or what interviewers might think of applicants while interviewing them for a job. In professional contexts, for example, people who dress in a well-tailored business suit are perceived as more competent, professional, and successful than those who wear casual clothes. Thus, people hold someone in considerable respect for his material possessions.

This is also apparent in our celebrities’ cases. Most actors, singers and models are revered for their lavish lifestyle or superior status in the social hierarchy. However, many of these superstars lack moral fibre as they get involved in substance abuse, cheating spouses and so on. Things like having a magnificent mansion, maintaining an extravagant lifestyle or achieving a high position in society are exalted above moral principles. A case in point is a celebrity in Bollywood, who was convicted for poaching rare antelopes, yet he still continues to receive accolades for his acting career.

To conclude, I think that material possessions are more important to society these days, and this can blatantly be obvious by how we behave towards those with no money and how we treat vacuous celebrities.

Sample 2:

We live in a world in which everyone is judgmental to the extent that one often makes inconsequential remarks in regard to things that does not affect one in the least bit, such as if other people are driving a Lamborgini or if they are carrying a Hermes bag. It seems as though old-fashioned values such as honour, generosity, and trust do not amount to much in today's condemnatory world. Apropos of the statement, I am in part accordance with it.

It is inarguable that a staggering number of people only consider how their connection can bring advantages to them when befriending someone. For instance, one might think twice before making friends with someone who is kind but impoverished, as there is no benefit that is likely to stem from the connection. On the flip side, ingratiating with someone who displays ostentatious wealth might be more auspicious for one in the future.

Similarly, one from a wealthy family might feel hesitant to befriend someone who is struggling to make ends meet, seeing as the latter is not on the same level as one in terms of social status. Also, there is no guarantee that one will not be on the receiving end of bullying if one befriends someone of a lower status. Case in point, kids from my school will not let Jaycea hear the end of it because she is friends with Elaine, a driver's daughter, notwithstanding the fact that Elaine is trustworthy and dependable.

On the contrast, I also believe that it is unreasonable to stereotype the whole society based on the behaviour and way of thinking of some people. Like the aforementioned case in which Jaycea is willing to befriend Elaine despite being bullied, it shows that it is possible for some people to value trust and generosity over social status.

To sum up, while it is commonplace for people to hold a higher value of material possessions and social status in this overcritical world, there are also people who value old-fashioned values more and they are not to be overlooked.

Sample 3:

It is true that people are judged based on their social status and personal wealth nowadays, and traditional values such as integrity and honesty are being forgotten. To a certain extent, I would agree with the fact that people are valued based on their wealth and status these days, but I also believe that old-fashioned values still play an important part in our societies.

It is believed that we are living in the pop culture and materialistic era these days, as the public judge each individual based on his/her social status and wealth. It can be seen from how celebrities become famous nowadays. Many celebrities are popular because of their physical appearance and personal wealth such Kim Kardashian. Her reality television program never shows any world class acting quality, but only shows her luxurious mansions and fancy cars. And then there are other celebrities who are well known due to his/her social status as the son or the daughter of a wealthy family. One of the examples would be Paris Hilton. Although she has many bad attitudes, she is still popular because she inherits the assets of her parents.

Although traditional values such as respect others, being responsible, honesty and integrity seem to be forgotten nowadays, they still play an important part in many communities. In common cases, employers are still assessing their potential employees based on their hard-working attitude, positive behaviour and their integrity. And then businesspeople are still looking for business partners who are reliable, can be trusted, and dependable. Therefore, it is important for adults to educate their children about these positive values because they still play an essential part in society.

In conclusion, even though people are judged based on their wealth and social status nowadays, I do believe that old-fashioned values such as honour, respect and trust cannot be eliminated from our daily lives. Therefore, we must teach our young generation about these cultures, in order for them to survive and succeed in the future.

Sample 4:

The rapid pace of global change has had a profound impact on the way society assesses an individual’s value. It is evident that contemporary evaluation of worth is heavily influenced by one’s financial standing and societal rank, while traditional virtues like honor, compassion, and trust seem to have diminished in significance. I vehemently disagree with this viewpoint.

While it is undeniable that material possessions and social status contribute to the external perception of an individual, I contend that the intrinsic value of a person is rooted in traits such as honor, kindness, and trust. It is a common adage not to judge a book by its cover, aptly illustrating the fallacy of assessing individuals solely based on their external wealth and status. These traditional values serve as a benchmark for genuine worth, distinguishing individuals of substance from those merely adorned with external opulence. For instance, a student at my former school discovered a substantial sum of money and promptly returned it to a teacher, displaying remarkable integrity. In recognition of this virtuous act, the principal commended the student in front of the entire school community.

Furthermore, the enduring significance of honor, kindness, and trust is underscored by their ability to shape meaningful relationships and foster a cohesive society. These virtues cultivate an environment of mutual respect and empathy, which are essential for sustainable and harmonious communal existence. Consequently, the notion that these values have become outdated or inconsequential in contemporary society is grossly misplaced.

In conclusion, despite the prominence of material wealth and social status as external markers of worth, the enduring value of a person lies in their possession of virtues such as honor, kindness, and trust. These intrinsic qualities not only define an individual’s character but also contribute to the fabric of a cohesive and ethical society.

Sample 5:

In today’s world, there is a widespread belief that a person’s value is mainly determined by their wealth and social status, while older virtues like integrity, compassion, and confidence are seen as unimportant. I strongly uphold the view that traditional values continue to hold great importance.

The emphasis on material riches can be attributed to two primary factors. Firstly, it is undeniable that wealth enables a comfortable and luxurious lifestyle, providing individuals with the means to engage in various experiences that contribute to their happiness and leisure. Consequently, many individuals prioritize the pursuit of wealth as a path to attaining contentment. Secondly, the widespread use of technology has led to an increased focus on material possessions in the pursuit of personal goals. Those who acquire wealth are often admired and revered, with modern-day billionaires serving as models to emulate.

However, despite the practical advantages outlined above, I argue that conventional values continue to exert a crucial influence on human existence. It is essential for individuals to recognize that integrity, compassion, and confidence form the foundation of their character. These attributes enable people to build connections within society and foster meaningful relationships, which are essential for achieving success. Moreover, possessing admirable traits not only cultivates sincerity but also enriches interpersonal relationships, thereby improving the overall quality of life.

In conclusion, while the pursuit of wealth and status has become a focal point for many due to societal progress, the enduring impact of traditional values on the attainment of success remains evident. It is therefore sensible to affirm that these values retain their significance in the contemporary context.

Sample 6:

There are numerous ways in which a person can be valued, and these vary widely from culture to culture. They also vary over time, and some people suggest that in the modern era it is more common for people to be judged according to their wealth, rather than personality attributes. This essay will argue that it is probably not true.

Looking around, it is easy to see why someone might claim that people are increasingly judged by their material possessions. One just has to look at social media, such as Instagram, to see how expensive possessions can equate to popularity. Young people aspire to have fast cars and designer clothes so that they can appear wealthy and gain the attention of others, building large online followings.

However, is this a modern phenomenon? It seems unlikely. In ancient eras, it was kings and queens who were revered by the wider society. They were not necessarily loved for their honour and wisdom; mostly they were adored for their wealth and power. People wanted to emulate them, just like today’s celebrities. The idea that these “old fashioned” values were somehow of value in historical eras, but not today, is probably false. In fact, in today’s democratic societies, it is common to see people admired and even rewarded because of their outstanding personality traits, whereas in the past these may have been overlooked.

In conclusion, people have probably always worshipped others because of their social status and material possessions. The idea that we are now living in a vapid, materialistic age is likely untrue.

Sample 7:

Given the power and influence of the super-rich, it might seem as if social status and material possessions are the new symbols of personal worth, but in everyday life, I do not think this is true.  

It is apparent that most celebrities today are admired or envied solely for their material wealth or position in various social hierarchies. Many of these people are known to turn their backs on friends, cheat on their spouses or spend their evenings over-indulging in alcohol and drugs. Things like owning a mansion, driving an expensive car, and getting into A-list parties are exalted above old-fashioned values. Ultimately, though, it is the many readers of gossip magazines and celebrity blogs who reinforce these ideas.  

Nevertheless, I believe that most people still believe in values such as honor, kindness, and trust in their day-to-day lives. In some way, most of us want to form loving families, raise our children to be good citizens, stand up for the oppressed, and protect our communities from harm. We still form friendships, romances, and business partnerships based on old-fashioned criteria. When our trust is abused, or we are unfairly treated, we see that as a major violation of our relationship, and we judge the wrongdoer accordingly.

In conclusion, I believe there is some truth to the notion that status and possessions have superseded old-fashioned values as a measure of a person’s worth. However, looking beyond the tabloids, it is apparent that most ordinary people have still preserved an old-fashioned conscience. 

Sample 8:

Our society has progressed in many ways but regrettably regressed in terms of humanity. It is argued that a person's value is determined more significantly by their social stature and wealth as opposed to the core values they possess. This essay only strongly agrees with the statement as we are indeed currently surrounded by a materialistic generation but there are still instances where the importance of humanity has not been superseded yet.

It is irrefragable that the community we live in today is superficial. Someone's influence and affluence are enough to earn them friends, a job and uncountable favours. As repulsive as it could get, people have even begun initiating connections with others based on looks, popularity and richness. Korean drama shows such as True Beauty, for instance, exemplify exactly that. The web series features a girl who is mistreated and ignored due to her appearance notwithstanding her beautiful persona, all of which changes drastically when she uses heavy makeup to entirely change her get-up. In real life too, a politician's son would hypothetically receive more benefits at a government-funded institute as opposed to a poorer but brighter student. This mirrors how our current society has become quicker to "judge a book by its cover".

On the contrary, this mindset hasn't entirely infiltrated this generation. There are still areas where fundamental human values like honour, kindness and trust take precedence. A befitting example of this is the practice that doctors follow. In a hospital, patients are never prioritised or shown partiality based on parameters like financial strength or social credibility. Instead, they are only prioritised based on clinical needs and every patient is treated with compassion regardless of their position in the societal hierarchy. Instances like these truly leave room for hope, convincing us that the importance of human values has not yet eroded completely.

In conclusion, this essay agrees that an individual is analysed more based on parameters like social status and wealth to only some extent because people do indeed behave rather ostensibly nowadays. However, the essay cannot fully agree with the statement as there are also aspects of society where primary principles like kindness matter most.

Sample 9:

Human society is changing rapidly and core values such as honour, trust and kindness are not as important as they used to be. It is believed by many that money has replaced those core human values and people are now analysed by their status. I partially agree with this point of view and believe that still there are some areas where humanity does matter instead of money.

To begin with, there is no doubt that the way people live has now changed a lot and the most visible change in society is its hunger towards money. Everyone in the world is after money and due to this fact people are now making connections with those who their status matches. For example, nowadays, people judge others based on their appearance and then give them treatment based on their judgement. Because of this money-driven society, there are many other serious problems rising like extremism and polarization.

On the contrary, though society is changing rapidly, and core human values are not as important, still there are some places where core values matter. For instance, when hiring an employee, a recruiter does not focus on the candidate's status or wealth, but his skills are checked. Secondly, there are still many people in society who value humans rather than money.

To conclude, it is true that society has changed a lot and is now driven by money. But still, there are instances and people in this world who value the core aspects of being human.

Sample 10:

There are groups of individuals who believe that social status and material belongings are the basis of their worth at the present time. Others opine that honour, kindness and trust, which are the old-fashioned core values, are not essential. I firmly agree that the behaviour and character of a person are crucial to judging the worth of one's life.

In our society which is surrounded by famous and wealthy artists who owned luxurious private vehicles and villas, the community might see them as the worthiest citizen above all. For instance, in the Philippines, the public gives importance to this popular actor since their material possessions are immeasurable to the extent that the state provides them all the special treatment and access to fine dining restaurants once they had their meal. Consequently, in the public, they are indispensable people.

However, I think people who possess good right conduct must be considered by society to look up to because material things may vanish in just a snap of seconds, but the character will remain as it is. In addition, being kind and trustworthy along with having an honour for themselves may help others to realize the real essence of living and treating others even without those fancy valuables. For example, in Africa, most population have the kindest and pure hearts that can be seen in every situation, likewise, these human beings can be trusted enough because it's from the bottom of their hearts and conscience. Hence, not having material objects and showing old-fashioned behaviour made them worthy throughout their existence.

As an average individual, I had observed in our village that people are showcasing honour, kindness and trust towards their fellow men in such a way the young generations may witness it, practice and inherit this valuables behaviour that money cannot buy. Like my own grandparents, they are farmers in my hometown and most neighbourhoods respect them a lot as a result of the kindness that they shared with the community.

To conclude, others may possess all the material wealth in this world and people might see them as worthy, however, in the long run, those crowds who showcase great values and right conduct are still the worthiest among all people.

Sample 1:

In the past, young people only had limited rights to handle their own lives since their parents made all the decisions for them. Yet with the appearance of the Internet and the awareness of most parents, young people today have more rights and a better ability to make their own decision. In the first place, rapid development of the Internet makes it easier for young people to gather information for decision-making. The Internet can provide almost all the information people need, and with the valuable information got from the Internet, adolescents have the ability to make more considerate decisions than they used to. In contrast, parents acted as the only source of information for young people, for no other information was available, which made young people depend too much on their parents. Take my experience for instance. I used to make a perfect family party plan by searching and collecting useful information on the Internet. I learned from other successful plans online and took key factors into full consideration, such as the weather, financial budget, transportation, the health condition of my grandmother, etc. This party plan makes my parents believe I have the ability to decide on my own and since then I was given more chances to make decisions independently. Furthermore, parents now attach more importance to cultivating children's ability to think independently. Thanks to the new education concept, a growing number of parents believe that the core of education is the promotion of comprehensive quality and more of them realize that it is important to build children's confidence and independence. This realization makes parents respect young people and turn the decision over to children. Besides, the school today offers various courses, and the children now are educated in a more well-rounded way than before. Parents do feel powerless to make all decisions for their kids. For example, my cousin, Jack, has been encouraged to make most decisions on his own. His parents, who have read lots of books on child growth, believe that only by training Jack to be independent at a young age can he achieve success in the competitive society. Moreover, sometimes they also find it difficult to give any valuable suggestions for Jack's study, since they are not the experts of all the fields. How can parents decide which English dictionary should be bought when they know nothing about English? In conclusion, the situation is much better than it used to be, in which parents build trust in their kids and kids are able to decide by themselves. While at the same time, rational suggestions from parents can never be ignored.

Sample 2:

The ability to make decisions can be considered as one of the vital signs of maturity. Because it proves that the individual's personality is developed enough to choose the right path in life, even though some people believe that today, young people are better decision-makers, due to lifestyle changes, I am afraid I have to disagree with this belief for two critical reasons.

Firstly, in the past, people used to get married at very young ages. The youth was both mentally and physically prepared for early marriage. By marriage, there is no chance of staying dependent on family. For example, my grandmother was born in one of the countries of Tabriz. She has told many stories about young girls' lives getting married at age 16. She explained that the girls were used to becoming housekeepers at very young ages and then gave birth before they were 18 years old. This rapid development of life for those young girls made the girls autonomous. My grandmother got married when she was 16, and she was pregnant by 19. She says that she had no choice but to only become dependent. This also happened to boys. The young boys quickly learned the way of being a husband and father for their family.

Secondly, the families were extended. In every family, there were at least four children. So, parents could barely pay attention to all the children. In other words, they were less concerned with their children's raising. They believed that older children could exemplify for their younger siblings. As an example, I am an only child. My parents entirely focused on me to teach me everything they could. They always were so worried about the environment where I studied, worked, or even had fun. Although These concerns were beneficial for me and were considered a kind of protection, they reduced my ability to choose and decide in different situations of my own life.

In sum, today young people rely on their parents more than in the past. Because usually the children are raised in nuclear families and also the marriage age is increased to 30s. This means that young people remain under their parent's supervision for an extended period.

Sample 1:

It is considered by some that being a university graduate is the key to securing a good job, while there are others who think that it is better to have experience and soft skills. In my opinion, I believe that having university education is essential for academic jobs, while soft skills and experience are more useful in business.

On the one hand, many think it is easier for most people to find a good job if they are university graduates with a good degree. In other words, having tertiary education puts people one step ahead of others who do not, and this can be the deciding factor in getting a good job. The competition to get into universities and the increasing number of graduates show just how significant this level of education is for people's future work opportunities.

On the other hand, having work experience and soft skills, such as leadership skills and other interpersonal skills, can also throw the balance in favour of the applicant, according to some. For many positions there are an overwhelming number of applicants and, therefore, it is often thought that having relevant experience in that line of work or having acquired useful soft skills that can be valuable to a company, can put one ahead of the game when applying for a position.

Finally, in my opinion, whether needing high level education or skills and experience, depends on the position being applied for. Take for example law, medicine or teaching, it is impossible to be considered for a position without the required educational background. In contrast, in business, it would be more important for a candidate to have soft skills and experience in that line of business so they can step into a position without further training and be of immediate benefit to the company.

In conclusion, getting a good job requires a relevant background either in experience or education depending on the type of work and field. People should make sure they attain the necessary skills or degrees before applying for a job in order to be sure of success.

Sample 2:

In this day and age, individuals are considered ineligible for a high paying job if they lack a remarkable educational record from reputed academic institutes. The significance of being qualified as a person has become paramount in today’s corporate world. At the same time, simply attaining theoretical knowledge without practical experience is also an unsuitable trait. Many believe that having more work experience makes a candidate stand out from the crowd. In my opinion, having practical knowledge is more consequential when it comes to job-hunting.

It is a well-known fact that presently every organisation demands a well-educated candidate, even for entry-level positions. The first impression recruiters have of candidates is greatly influenced by a person’s CV, which mainly comprises a person’s qualifications. Consequently, students tend to take on several certificate courses whilst pursuing a university education to help gain an edge over other candidates. Moreover, in most high-paying jobs like a doctor, lawyer or engineer, having adequate knowledge and training is crucial for betterment. What is more important is that, nowadays, university education provides theoretical knowledge and enough exposure that aids in the holistic development of an individual.

Nevertheless, we must also acknowledge that work experience holds significant value when seeking high-profile job roles. Only being aware of theories and concepts without any practical idea of utilising them is completely futile. Due to this fact, work experience is a determining factor when applying for a master’s degree like MBA and is an undeniable indicator of the advantage experienced individuals have over the rest. Apart from that, the rationale behind preferring experienced professionals is that such individuals will require less time and effort to learn and adapt to an organisation and the type of work they are responsible for, as opposed to freshers who need to be trained to be productive.

In conclusion, I would like to say that having a decent education and relevant practical competency are both equally vital for securing lucrative employment. However, experiential learning is indeed more indicative of a person’s capabilities.

Sample 3:

In the contemporary world, the pathway to securing a good job is a subject of heated debate. Some advocate that practical experience and the development of soft skills outweigh the significance of completing a university education. Conversely, others believe that the traditional route of achieving a degree is pivotal for obtaining a promising career. Personally, I contend that completing university education is the optimal means to secure a good job in the modern world due to its multifaceted benefits and broader career prospects it offers.

Supporters of gaining experience and soft skills argue that practical knowledge acquired through work experience often proves more valuable in the professional sphere. By engaging in real-world scenarios, individuals can acquire critical competencies such as communication, problem-solving, and teamwork, which are perceived as essential in many workplaces. For example, an individual who has climbed the ranks in a company may possess substantial practical insights and networking connections, providing them with an edge in securing a job compared to fresh graduates.

However, while practical experience undeniably offers valuable insights, obtaining a university degree furnishes individuals with comprehensive knowledge and a strong educational foundation. University education not only imparts specialised knowledge but also instils analytical thinking, research abilities, and a deep understanding of a particular field. This comprehensive learning equips graduates with a broad spectrum of skills applicable across diverse industries, enhancing their adaptability and potential for career advancement.

Moreover, in today's competitive job market, many employers prioritize candidates with formal qualifications. A university degree often acts as a prerequisite for entry into certain professions, thereby opening doors to a wider array of job opportunities.

In conclusion, while experience and soft skills hold value, the overarching benefits of university education, including specialised knowledge, critical thinking, and enhanced career prospects, make it the superior pathway to securing a rewarding job in the contemporary world.

Sample 4:

The quest for a secure and fulfilling career throws two divergent paths – university education and job experience. While some advocate for the undeniable weight of a university degree in securing desirable positions, others endorse the crucial role of experience and sharpened soft skills. My opinion is that job experience and soft skills are far more helpful in securing a fulfilling career.

Those who support university education for a better career say that in an increasingly knowledge-driven economy, academic credentials remain a passport to entry for many fields. Specialized degrees equip individuals with advanced knowledge, analytical skills, and the ability to critically evaluate and innovate within their chosen domains. A research scientist, for instance, would require the theoretical foundation and meticulous training offered by a university programme to make groundbreaking discoveries and have a great career.

Advocates of the experiential path point to the invaluable lessons learned from real-world work. Training programmes and volunteer initiatives offer opportunities to hone practical skills, build resilience, and develop a keen understanding of industry nuances. A young entrepreneur, for instance, may find the lessons learned through trial and error in launching a start-up far more valuable than textbook entrepreneurship concepts. Additionally, soft skills, from communication and teamwork to adaptability and problem-solving, flourish in the dynamic environment of real-world challenges, often exceeding the reach of traditional classroom settings.

In my opinion, university graduates may be armed with specialized knowledge to get a job, but with honed soft skills and real-world experience, their counterparts also emerge as formidable candidates. Honed soft skills and job experience often offer avenues of career options that a simple degree fails to offer.

In conclusion, even though both experience and university education hold undeniable value in the equation of career success, the key to securing a "good job" and building an enviable career lies in choosing to gain soft skills and practical skills.

Sample 5:

Education is a building block of society these days. It is considered by some that being a university graduate is key to success and securing a good job, while there are others who think that it is better to have experience and soft skills. Although a university diploma is required and beneficial for a future career, in my opinion, soft skills and experience are essential in business.

On the one hand, graduating the university is crucial for academic jobs. In other words, having a university diploma is required by many companies, because it can put people one step ahead from their counterparts and this can be the deciding factor in getting a good job. Take for instance doctors, teachers and lawyers; their job is strictly connected with academic achievement and qualification. If they have not got a university diploma, they will not be able to work in the field of politics. Despite the benefits of having a tertiary education for future perspectives, I believe that experience and soft skills are vital.

On the other hand, experience and soft skills such as leadership skills and other interpersonal skills can be a huge advantage for their future work opportunities. That is to say, there are many applicants applying for a job, however, a person with experience and soft skills may have a chance to get a better job and incentives for their salary. In addition, there are some professions which do not require a special qualification or diploma. Put simply, people working in the field of farming, housekeeping and trading only need experience and certain skills for their job.

In conclusion, while getting a good job requires a relevant background in both academic achievement and experience, I think that soft skills are crucial for individuals’ future perspectives and monetary rewards. However, people should make sure whether they need necessary skills and degrees or soft skills and experience depending on their type of work and field.

Sample 6:

Acquiring a job is a dream for every youngster. While some people think that university education is a prerequisite to get a good job, others have a feeling that gaining experience and developing soft skills is of prime importance. However, in my opinion both the above factors hold importance for settling with a good job.

On one hand, completing university education has been thought by a few as the best way to aim for a good job. This is because most the job recruiters list qualification as the most important criterion for application. In addition, the number of students gaining tertiary education has drastically increased denoting the demand of qualified professionals. Moreover, certain professionals like teachers and doctors need to be trained in universities to be experts as well as to gain mass acceptance.

On the other hand, experience and soft skills are considered as the most important requirement by some. The reason for this assumption may be that sometimes experience and soft skills like interpersonal and communication skills may be taken into consideration when all the applicants for a particular job are equally qualified. Moreover, the candidate who is experienced and skilled is likely to perform better in comparison with the one who is merely qualified.

In my opinion, university education, experience and soft skills hold equal importance for a fruitful job. While education seeds the theoretical aspects of subjects, experience and soft skills will definitely take the candidate a step higher for a better career.

In conclusion, settling with a good career is a matter of sustenance. Although people have varied opinions on the requirements to get a good job, I believe it is a necessity to be qualified as well as experienced with adequate soft skills.

Sample 7:

There is much debate about the best way to land a desirable job. Some argue that getting a tertiary qualification is the surest path to get hired while others contend that acquiring experience and non-academic skills is better. Overall, I believe that both academic qualifications and job experience are needed to secure a great job because both aspects are equally valuable.

Firstly, a tertiary education provides you with the opportunity to acquire specific skills and knowledge that are pre-requisite to performing well in your future job. For example, to become a doctor one needs to have technical knowledge about treating illness and disease. Without learning about anatomy, causes of sickness and understanding the human body in-depth at university, a doctor would not be able to perform his or her duties at all. Clearly, a university qualification equips students with technical skills and theory necessary for their prospective career.

On the other hand, some occupations value experience and other skills that a tertiary education does not explicitly provide. Jobs such as sales, marketing and advertising may favour an individual’s soft skills such as his persuasive ability, communication skills and prior experience over theoretical knowledge. In this instance, a university degree might not help a job-seeker as much as an impressive resumé filled with various job experiences and extra-curricular achievements.

In my opinion, I view both tertiary education and job experience with development of soft skills as equally important factors to get hired for a coveted job. Combining both university qualifications and soft skills acquired through real-world experience seems to be the best way to improve prospects of a great career.

Sample 8:

The question of whether completing a university education or gaining experience and soft skills is the best path to a good job has long been debated. This essay examines both perspectives, highlighting the benefits of each approach. However, it argues that a balanced approach that combines formal education with practical experience and the development of soft skills is essential in today's competitive job market.

Completing a university education offers several advantages. First, it equips individuals with specialized knowledge and expertise in a specific field. Through rigorous coursework and academic training, students gain a deep understanding of their chosen discipline. Second, a university degree serves as a recognized credential that often acts as a prerequisite for many job opportunities. Employers often value the level of dedication and commitment demonstrated by those who have earned a degree. Lastly, university education fosters the development of critical thinking, analytical skills, and problem-solving abilities, which are highly sought-after qualities in the professional world.

On the other hand, gaining experience and soft skills should not be underestimated. Practical application of knowledge and hands-on learning in real-world environments provide invaluable insights and understanding. Additionally, the development of interpersonal skills, teamwork, and effective communication is crucial for success in any job. Employers often emphasize the importance of these soft skills as they contribute to a candidate's ability to collaborate, adapt, and thrive in a professional setting. Furthermore, experience equips individuals with resilience and the capacity to handle real-world challenges, which cannot be fully replicated in a classroom setting.

However, relying solely on one approach can have drawbacks. Relying exclusively on university education may result in a lack of practical experience and application-oriented skills. Graduates may face challenges when entering the workforce, as employers often prioritize candidates with hands-on experience. Conversely, focusing solely on experience and soft skills might limit career advancement opportunities without the foundation of specialized knowledge and academic qualifications.

Therefore, a balanced approach that combines formal education with internships, co-op programs, and practical training is vital. By pursuing both avenues, individuals can acquire the necessary technical expertise while also developing essential soft skills. Lifelong learning and continuous professional development should also be emphasized to adapt to evolving industry demands and stay competitive in the job market.

In conclusion, securing a good job requires a balanced approach that encompasses both university education and the development of experience and soft skills. Each approach offers distinct advantages, and a combination of both enhances an individual's employability and long- term success. By valuing the benefits of both formal education and practical experience, individuals can equip themselves with the tools necessary to excel in the dynamic and competitive job market of today.

Sample 9:

Completing university education has long been seen as a ticket to a successful career. It is believed that a degree not only provides individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills for their chosen field but also opens doors to lucrative job opportunities. On the other hand, there are those who argue that practical experience and the development of soft skills are more crucial in securing a good job.

Proponents of university education argue that it equips individuals with the necessary knowledge and expertise to excel in their chosen profession. For instance, a degree in engineering provides students with a solid foundation in theoretical concepts and practical skills, making them more attractive to potential employers. Furthermore, a university education is often seen as a prerequisite for many high-paying jobs, particularly in fields such as medicine, law, and finance.

However, critics of this view argue that experience and soft skills are equally, if not more, important in the job market. They argue that practical experience allows individuals to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world situations, thereby enhancing their problem-solving abilities and adaptability. Additionally, soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and leadership are often cited as crucial factors in career success. Employers are increasingly placing emphasis on these skills, as they contribute to a positive work environment and overall productivity.

In my opinion, both university education and practical experience are important in securing a good job. While a degree provides individuals with a solid foundation of knowledge, practical experience and soft skills are equally valuable in the competitive job market. Therefore, individuals should strive to strike a balance between academic achievement and real-world experience to maximize their career prospects.

Sample 10:

Many are of the view that going to university provides the most effective method for getting a reputable task, others believe that having valuable experience and skills holds greater value. In my opinion, the synthesis of both of them is a coherent decision.

On the one hand, some people completely suggest that passing graduate school is the finest path in order to get a nice job. In other words, they spend much time learning theoretical skills and reading others' experiences. A good example of this would be Nicola Tesla who had a nice occupation, he immersed himself in books and went to distinct universities, due to discovering electricity and expanding it as well as inventing some formulas he became one of the affluent men and was manager of several companies, next he spent all of his money in order to discover and invent something else. Although going to university and being a knowledgeable person can be a benefit, it is not surely, because you should find a job that is relevant to your area of specialization.

On the other hand, having valuable experience and devoting time to learning interactive techniques can be more effective, instead of going to college, such as body language, how to communicate and how to be successful in a trade discussion. There are countless examples of individuals who do not go to university and have a good occupation even if they have powerful authority. A striking example of this is Richard Branson. He didn’t study, in fact, he resigned from the school, and then he founded over 100 companies in order to trade. He found that he had a good ability to establish a close bond and communicate with others, instead of studying and going to graduate school.

All in all, as can be seen from the points in this essay, you need to weigh up both viewpoints to realize what kind of them is suitable for you. It seems to me that having a synthesis of a college certificate and playing a role as an apprentice and getting experience and technique is a coherent decision rather than choosing one of them, they are fundamental equally.

Sample 11:

There are different attitudes towards the best approach to gaining a better job position among other applicants. While some people believe that obtaining a qualification from a university is the most significant factor in this regard, others argue that developing soft skills and having relevant experience play a vital role in receiving a better offer. In my opinion, all these matters differ from one job position to another.

On one hand, it is worth mentioning the importance of a university degree in many professional fields. If you look at most of the well-paid job advertisements in various applications or websites, the minimum requirement for applying for these positions is having relevant university-certified qualifications. For example, to become a successful lawyer or doctor, one should study at a prestigious university and obtain the necessary certification. Moreover, many educational institutions provide their students with appropriate apprenticeships after graduation, offering valuable insights into career prospects and the work environment.

On the other hand, having relevant experience in a real-world environment can help candidates develop essential personality traits such as strong interpersonal skills, leadership skills and the ability to work efficiently in a team. For instance, when applying for a place in sales, marketing or customer service departments in a business company, the human resource manager typically looks for a resume with related experiences rather than just higher education certifications.

In conclusion, the controversial debate about the crucial factor in securing the best job opportunity continues. In my perspective, the value of an educational degree versus soft skills largely depends on the type of a profession and the employer’s circumstances at the time of applying for employment opportunities.

Sample 12:

In today's world, there's a growing discussion about the importance of life and work experience compared to completing a university degree. I graduate to those who believe that a university degree plays a crucial role in achieving success in future prospects, both views will be elaborated on here.

To begin with, hard skills and academic knowledge are vital for various professions. Consider, for instance, the medical field, where doctors, including surgeons, need a deep understanding of human anatomy and a wide range of medical conditions. Professors, who are experts in their fields, conduct lectures and seminars, helping students stay up-to-date with the latest research and information. Moreover, the collegiate environment of universities serves as a hub for like-minded individuals who share similar interests. This not only fosters academic growth but also helps build important connections with future colleagues.

Turning to the other side of the argument, even with a top-ranked university education, these hard skills alone may not guarantee a successful career. Soft skills like communication, adaptability, and time management are just as crucial today. Employers highly value candidates who can work well in teams, have leading qualities, adapt to changing circumstances, and manage their tasks efficiently. Hence, I firmly believe that possessing a balanced combination of both hard and soft skills is not only helpful but also indispensable for a successful career.

In conclusion, the debate about whether work experience is more valuable than a university degree remains ongoing. Balancing education and experience can be the key to long-term professional success.

Sample 1:

The world is continuously evolving with new infrastructure. With the advent of supermarkets, hypermarkets, and complexes, the way people shop has changed. They have basically sidelined the local markets and small shops. I opine that this is a positive development, and this essay will reflect upon a few reasons for the same.

There are various reasons for the popularity of supermarkets. These offer a lot of convenience to the public with various features ranging from multiple payment options to home deliveries. Secondly, they offer quality produce, whether it is a packaged item or fresh produce. Quantity is another strong factor and supermarkets offer generous quantities with more affordable and bargain prices. The produce available in supermarkets is mostly available at fixed prices, resulting in less frequent changes and is less prone to market rate fluctuations. A lot of products generally available are branded, resulting in a more assured and promised buying experience.

These markets are plusher and more upmarket, resulting in a better and ambient shopping experience as opposed to the local shops. They offer a plethora of facilities such as hygienic washrooms, televisions, food counters, helpers, trolleys, air conditioning to name a few. Lastly, there is the fact that these places stock everything neatly and display them in an organised manner. This systematic display allows the buyers to purchase in bulk at a cheaper price, consequently reflecting in the form of better spending habits in people. To sum it up, I think these factors have a positive impact on people’s lives and hence, this phenomenon of shopping in supermarkets and avoiding the local shops is a positive one.

Sample 2:

Supermarkets are becoming increasingly popular, leaving the local stores far behind in competition. The reason for such a phenomenon is the enhanced shopping experience for consumers. Overall, it is a positive trend, and this stand shall be explained further in the essay.

According to latest statistics, most people are now favouring supermarkets for the simple reason that everything they require can be shopped from under one roof like groceries, apparels, electronics, toiletries and so on. Supermarkets have a large air-conditioned ambiance, along with organized departments and a trained, friendly staff to assist customers with their shopping requirements. Moreover, supermarkets stock a variety of brands and products which make the consumer’s selection wider and his choice a more well-informed one. Unlike certain malpractices of the local shops, say of promoting a particular brand only, supermarkets take the feedback of their customers and stock products accordingly.

Since supermarkets stock products in a larger quantity, they are able to quote them in prices cheaper than other smaller retail stores. Many supermarket chains run offers and discount coupon schemes. Also, some supermarkets also offer home delivery services, which is undoubtedly a considerable benefit. Although there is a drawback of more time being consumed in search of items, it can be passed upon as shopping is becoming more of a leisure time activity day by day. Catering to this need, some supermarkets also house a food court, making the consumers’ shopping time a very enjoyable one.

Needless to say, superstores are definitely the more preferred choice by consumers. The convenient and cheaper shopping experience, along with trusted quality products has marked their rationalized rise in the market.

Sample 3:

Today we can witness the fact that mega-stores are becoming more popular among individuals rather than minor outlets or open markets. The main reason for this alarming trend, in my opinion, is comfortability in concert with a substantial discount scheme.

To begin with, few people would argue with the fact that most supermarkets are provided with a well-designed layout. To be more precise, for the most part, goods are located in appropriate departments, which certainly makes it less challenging for consumers to find a necessary product. For instance, if one wants to buy a dairy product along with household chemicals in an open market, they will be forced to look for commodities in various minor outlets, which is definitely time-consuming. Additionally, many supermarkets offer a special discount system by providing their consumers with diverse membership cards.

Consequently, I consider this trend as a positive influence in attitude towards society. Not only can people assign their precious time, saved during shopping in a supermarket, to their dear ones, but they are also enabled to buy goods at a decent price. As a result, it will positively impact their frame of mind together with their family budget. However, we cannot neglect one drawback regarding local markets or small shops. The deficiency of consumers will lead them to shut down and as a knock-off effect, it might increase the unemployment rate.

In summary, I deem that bargain prices and convenient location of goods make consumers prioritize supermarkets over local markets and minor outlets.

Sample 4:

There is no doubt that recently, the number of small merchant’s shops has plummeted. The question is, is it true that customers prefer going shopping in a large mall rather than a small one? In this essay, I am going to discuss the view and submit my opinion.

In terms of advantages, mega-stores or shops provide well-designed layouts. The main reason given to support these claims is this arrangement with names of product labels that aid the customer to find a necessary product. To illustrate, if one wants to buy a dairy product with household chemicals in an open market, they will be forced to look for commodities labels to guide them where they are without asking anyone. In other words, dividing the segments of the product definitely means time-consuming. Also, the big supermarket offers delivery services without fees, thus will attract customers to deal with them.

However, tiny groceries might not have a massive reputation as mega-stores. Firstly, customers may feel a loss of trust in the products. Secondly, by the amount of, commodity if no one buys it, it will be rotten due to the expiration date.

Even though the customer can easily find what they search for in the small shop, they could buy a bad brand of a commodity.

In conclusion, although the small local shop has not insignificant customers, mega-stores have a variety of products. I believe that the traders of supermarkets, whether big or small, should concern for the customer by facilitating processes for their needs to reach them rapidly.

Sample 5:

In this concurrent era, everything is easily available in the markets. There is a discussion going on that these days the majority of folks like to do shopping from shopping centres instead of local shops. According to my point of view, it is a positive development. I will discuss this and share my point of view in upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with the benefits of supermarkets. The preponderant one is availability. It is seen that everyday usable products are not properly accessible in local and small shops. People have to visit distinct stores to purchase their items. But, in supermarkets, everything is present, due to the fact that masses can save their time by visiting there. Moreover, local shops or markets always sell their products at print rates, but supermarket shopkeepers always lower the price from print rates as they also buy things at half price. Thus, they just forward things with little profit. It is really beneficial for customers.

Furthermore, the majority of supermarket vendors like to incline their reputation in their business, so they like to have high-quality products to sell, rather than cheaper ones. Thus, individuals can expect the best quality items from supermarkets as well. To exemplify this, these days there is a lot of competition between shopkeepers about their sales. They always have to have the best quality products in their shop, So, more and more people visit their store.

To conclude, according to my point of view, shopping centres have a lot of benefits that can be avail to people. But, it can lower the business of local shopkeepers, which is also another major factor to consider.

Sample 1:

Shopping has become more common as a result of the introduction of large shopping malls. I strongly believe this has brought considerable economic benefits to society at large.

Since the advent of the mall, companies have relentlessly sought new ways to attract consumers, resulting in today’s megamalls. In the past, shoppers would make dedicated trips to specific stores for products. In the 1980s in the United States, the novel combination of shopping plazas and department stores with entertainment venues like state-of-the-art cinemas and appetizing foods courts made them the centre of social activity for a generation. It is therefore no wonder that youths and adults alike the world over opt to spend their time and money shopping at malls that cater to all their needs.

While some might argue that shopping is largely a waste of time, I feel that its economic advantages outweigh other concerns. Masses of wealthy middle-class consumers contribute greatly to economic prosperity and that brings various benefits to all socioeconomic classes. A counter-point illustrating this would be in Japan in the last two decades where a long recession has decimated the middle-class, leading to decreased shopping, closures of malls and a stagnant economy. The government has desperately lowered interest rates in order to stimulate the type of spending that malls encourage. Malls, as one crucial part of a consumer society, serve to encourage spending and national prosperity.

In conclusion, an increasing number of people frequent malls for their convenience and this boosts the economy. If governments were to invest more money in tax cuts this would further encourage spending at malls and help developing nations and developed ones whose growth has plateaued.

Sample 2:

There is no denying the fact that people, nowadays, have become more shopaholic in comparison to the past years. In fact, in many parts of the world, shopping is a free-time activity for people, especially youngsters. According to me, it is a negative development although it has a few advantages as well.

Consumerism has become a trend among the masses and classes because shoppers buy things from a ‘luxury point’ of view but not out of ‘necessity. Primarily, teenagers intend to have quick access to everything which drags them to spend extravagantly. In a tendency to follow the herd, they buy things merely to show off but not according to their needs. Moreover, the super-hot deals and endless choices in gadgets, motor vehicles, and clothes lure them enormously. Most importantly, these days the availability of credit cards has facilitated the youngsters to buy more even during the non-availability of money in the account.

Shopping as a leisure activity is a positive development only when young adults manage their budget independently to fulfil their short-term goals of buying the gadgets or branded items they longed for. This urge to achieve their goals motivates them to work harder. Moreover, the satisfaction of coping with the up-to-date standard of living is another good reason for young folks to shop more.

However, the mindset of fulfilling unnecessary desires while shopping is a negative development for society as a whole. Since in the rat race of owning expensive things, youth ignore the investments and savings for the security of the future. Binge shopping further makes people spend much more than they actually afford, which submerges them in huge debts. Ultimately, all these things hamper their growth on professional and economic fronts.

To core out, it is certainly a negative development because the drawbacks of this leisure activity have the edge over the few immediate benefits. Savings are immensely important for one and all since the future is unpredictable and savings are a saviour in the unforeseen consequences.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, a lot of young people living in cities would rather spend their leisure time going shopping than doing other activities. This essay will explain the reasons for this tendency and examine its effects to see whether it is beneficial or harmful.

To start with, there are several causes that need discussing. Firstly, shopping can help release stress, also known as retail therapy. According to a study conducted with shoppers aged 25-35, stress relief is often attributed to the gratification of spending one’s own money on something they like or need, and the convenience of shopping centres. Secondly, compared to other leisure activities such as sports and reading, shopping does not cause constraints at all. This is because sports and reading both involve the idea of self-discipline while shopping does not, so it is often chosen over the other two.

This phenomenon produces the following effects, which have both positive and negative sides. Firstly, while shopping helps individuals reduce their mental pressure, it may also cause addiction. Secondly, while this tendency encourages economic growth, it may also create an imbalance among economic sectors. For instance, the amount of land used to build shopping centres would increase dramatically while land for factories and farms would be cut down. Therefore, it is clear that moderation plays an essential role here. On the one hand, going shopping to relax is a very good idea, but on the other hand, we should keep this habit under control.

In conclusion, shopping has become popular with young city dwellers as a leisure activity because it effectively helps with stress reduction. However, it is difficult to decide whether this trend is solely positive or negative. One thing we know for sure, though, is that it should be done moderately.

Sample 4:

Shopping has become the most desired medium of relaxation and enjoyment among teenagers across several nations. The reasons behind this trend will be discussed in the upcoming crumb of my writing along with some points which will clarify how it is a positive development.

To initiate with, the main reason why the youth is so inclined towards shopping is because they get to buy things of necessity in their leisure time as well as it helps them to feel relaxed. Shopping gives a sense of satisfaction to the buyers as by purchasing things, they feel they have control over things in their life. Moreover, people nowadays shop more than in the past whenever they are unoccupied as they have so many mediums to shop now and also have a wide variety to choose from. They can go to the malls, local marketplaces as well as can do shopping online on countless e-commerce websites such as Amazon, eBay and many more. It cheers them up as it changes their mindset or helps them to forget about the worldly worries momentarily. Moreover, youngsters nowadays have become fashion freaks, and they want to have the latest collection of dresses, shoes and accessories in their wardrobe. Some people find it extremely difficult to resist the tempting displayed new arrivals in stores even if they have enough of everything already.

To continue, shopping in spare time is indeed a positive development because research has shown that shopping actually helps to lift the mood and is a good stress buster. Recent studies have shown that shopping actually causes the brain to release more serotonin, a chemical that makes one feel good. Moreover, it keeps the economy boosted and the retail business on the go. So many masses get employment and business out of this habit or urge of shopping among the populace. Moreover, when people go shopping, they get to interact with so many people which helps them to reduce stress and lower stress levels are directly related to longevity. Also, shopping is a good form of exercise as when people shop, they walk around in huge malls and marketplaces which keep them physically active. Lastly, shopping is also known to improve mental acuity when people view and go through so many items.

To sum up, although shopping is called an expensive therapy by many, I believe that if one shops with discretion by comparing prices and buys only what he/she needs, it is a good activity to remain up-to-date about the latest ongoing trends and is also a good way to get rid of monotony and tensions.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, many younger adults in a lot of countries like shopping as a leisure activity. There are some reasons for this trend, but I think it is a negative trend and will explain in this essay.

One of the reasons is that young adults spend a lot of time using social media. In social media, many famous people, such as actors, professional sports players and models. advertise the products they use. Although there are many advertisements on TV before appearing on social media, the duration is much shorter than the advertisement on social media. In addition, famous people can interact with customers on social media, and they can advertise the products more effectively. Moreover, some of them even use hypo to attract consumers.

I believe this is a negative trend because it causes a decrease in exercise. These days, many people buy products online instead of going to shops since it is more convenient. Therefore, by this trend, they tend to stay at home and search for products online to buy the products they are promoted by famous people on social media as a leisure activity. As a result, they may have health problems, such as obesity and diabetes, leading to an increase in the death rate.

In conclusion, shopping becomes one of the most popular leisure activities because of the rise in the amount of time people spend on social media. In my opinion, it is a negative tendency since it causes health problems and heightens the death rate.

Sample 6:

As fashion evolves in the present world, shopping rises to become the most prominent recreation activity. This essay discusses the main causes for such and why I believe the arguments for its negative developmental nature are stronger.

There are two main reasons which are responsible for the growth of shopping among youngsters. Firstly, the low cost and high frequency with which new garments are released to encourage youth to constantly purchase items. For instance, trends are continuously updated on social media channels and television by exposing the new releases. In addition, youth feel peer pressure to fit in whenever their friends upload photos using new clothes to enhance social status. As a result, young adults end up spending more money and time buying to entertain themselves.

As purchasing increases, many negative impacts can be found in the social-environmental spectrum. For example, the increase in the rate of consumption implies several issues as manufacturers spend more energy and resources to meet demand. In addition, while the environment suffers as lakes and forests perish to provide factories with raw materials, our society becomes highly materialist as young individuals develop negative addiction to buying. As a result, the vicious cycle of buying becomes increasingly rooted in the younger generation’s cultural character.

In conclusion, as our society develops shopping rises to be deemed as the best hobby among the youth. I believe the negative developments of compulsive buying far outweigh the positive ones. Each individual, in my opinion, should be conscientious about the negative outcomes of consumerism as well as its addictive influence on human behaviours.

Sample 7:

In our modern society, the trend of spending the free time primarily on shopping among the youngsters has grown remarkably. Personally, I believe that the negative aspects of this tendency surpass the positive points. In my opinion, media influence and the ease of accessibility are the main reasons behind this development. In this essay, I shall critically examine the given topic and outline relevant examples to support my view.

To begin with, nowadays, the media have a significant influence on the people of the younger generation. Today, most of the advertisements shown on the television or the internet are targeted towards this particular age group. This greatly encourages the tendency to shop in one's spare time. For example, a recent study conducted at the Stanford University showed that due to the increased media influence, in the last decade, both offline and online shopping among the people of age 15 to 25 has risen considerably. These findings further illustrate the level of impact it has on young people.

Moreover, due to the recent advancements made in our mobile phone technology. It is now easier than ever to access online e-commerce websites on your cell phones. This is another reason behind this movement. In addition to this, a report published by the Oxford University press revealed that in the last 5 years, shopping apps for the mobile phones have witnessed a significant climb, due to the increased number of cell phone users, especially among the younger generation.

In conclusion, this is a topic which raises many questions in contemporary life. After a thorough analysis of the subject, I am inclined to say that the detrimental effects of this change cannot be denied, and thus it would be fruitful to search for possible solutions to this global problem.

Sample 8:

Most of the youngsters around the world, whether married or unmarried, consider shopping worthwhile to spend their free time. In terms of infrastructure advancement and luxury of an individual, I firmly believe that it is a good improvement of society. This essay discusses how the influence of shopping malls came into the picture and how it can help an individual youngster to develop himself or herself in society or family.

To begin with, in most of the urban areas the industrial evolution enabled employment on a very high scale which resulted in people who were able to earn a good salary, spend their time after working hours in malls, theatres and other entertainment activities. Thanks to the rapid changes in fashion, wares and trends, the malls became very popular among them. Furthermore, another reason could be the interest of an individual in expressing himself in a better version of himself when living in a populated area.

On the other hand, for an independent person, activities like shopping help to improve the aesthetic appearance which is an important for some of his personal and professional aspects. In addition to that, for a married couple, it gives a chance to spend their time with their partner and enables them to get to know about each other like their tastes, interests and preferences. Hence, in a way it can be agreed that this is a positive progress.

In conclusion, there are several reasons why youngsters now a days are showing much interest in shopping than any other entertainment activity. Although there are some environmental impacts because of shopping, the progress of the generation and they strive to project themselves in a good manner can be observed.

Sample 9:

Most of the youngsters are pursuing shopping as an activity to pass their leisure time. This trend is attributed to the increased use of adverts by companies to attract more and more buyers; however, it is a negative development because individuals- in this way- lose their financial resources, I believe.

Unprecedented use of advertisements is acting as a magnet to persuade adults to buy new things. Companies, these days, have endorsed their recently unveiled products with the help of film or sports celebrities with a view to enticing potential buyers. This practice has resulted in the sales of products being skyrocketed as people, especially adults, often tend to imitate their favourite stars and the products used by them. Hence, more and more people are purchasing new items. Prada- one of the largest internationally owned fashion chains- is using famous Hollywood Stars to embrace their products recorded a threefold rise in their sales as soon as they started promoting their products in this way.

However, shopping as an avocation can put an individual in a heavy financial strain. With the profound impact of commercials, youngsters are recklessly spending their earnings on the things, which they even do not need, making themselves grapple with their financial situation. Further use of plastic money to acquire new goods aggravates the situation as they eventually end up in heavy debt or often bankruptcy. In a recent research conducted by Bajaj Financery, it was revealed that young individuals usually overspend, making themselves fall prey to colossal debts.

In conclusion, adults are purchasing more and more items under the influence of advertisements, but it is, by and large, a negative phenomenon, given the economic strain it delivers to shoppers.

Sample 10:

In the modern-day western world, especially in the big cities, shopping is becoming increasingly popular as a leisure activity amongst young adults. This essay will discuss some of its most common reasons, such as higher disposable incomes and easy availability of cheaper goods in the big city. This essay will also argue why this is a positive development in today's world.

In many western countries, young adults, mainly millennials, have high disposable incomes owing to their well-paid jobs. This helps them spend more on shopping, mainly apparel and fast-moving consumer goods. In addition, the number of malls and supermarkets has been increasing significantly in the last decade or so, giving very easy access to affordable and good quality products. Due to these two factors combined, people have started considering shopping as one of the leisure activities that they pursue in their free times or over the weekends. For instance, a recent survey report states that more than 70% of young adults in big cities visit malls on the weekends for shopping.

The trend that an increasing number of young people are spending on shopping has created a high demand for various products in the market. This in turn has created more jobs and has been contributing to a stronger global economy. For example, the countries that manufacture apparel are seeing a higher demand for their products these days from the western nations to support their enhanced demand. Moreover, frequent shopping helps people keep up with the newest fashion trends, helping them boost their self-confidence. Thus, shopping, as a leisure activity, has positive impacts on societies as well as economies.

To conclude, many of the western countries are witnessing an increasing number of shoppers who buy things in their free time. This shift is being observed due to the emerging mall-culture and higher disposable incomes. Also, in my opinion, this is a positive development in the modern world as it is contributing to better societies and stronger economies.

Sample 1:

It is argued that enterprises should undertake social duties in addition to making profits. I completely agree with this viewpoint since they can attract more employees and raise their public image.

The first justification for my agreement is that taking social responsibility can enable firms to entice higher-quality employees. More specifically, qualified staff tend to favor companies that are famous for being socially responsible as the way they treat society potentially reflects the way they treat their workers. In other words, they might consider that their efforts and dedication to their jobs would be appreciated. To illustrate, Vingroup, a Vietnamese corporation which often allocates huge financial resources for charity work in the community, appeals to numerous workers. According to an in-house survey, one of the main reasons behind their choice to work for it is that it is praised for caring for society.

Another reason why I agree that businesses should undertake their responsibility towards society is that this can boost their image to the public. More specifically, by willingly cooperating with local authorities and inhabitants in preserving the environment or fulfilling other civic duties, they can gain acknowledgement from the community and potentially receive greater support from local people in their commercial activities. For instance, American big-box retailer Target Corp is well known for its social responsibility programs such as donating money to local communities in the form of education grants. As a result, they are given enormous favour from local people, enabling them to increase their sales and further develop their franchise.

In conclusion, I strongly advocate the idea that corporations should be accountable to society as it can allure more people to work for them and promote their brand image. It is advisable that companies engage in social activities to ensure their sustainable growth.

Sample 2:

Today, some claim that businesses should also have social obligations. While I acknowledge that the primary purpose of any company is to generate profits, businesses should also make social contributions within their sphere of influence.

On the one hand, it seems logical that the primary objective of companies engaged in a free market should be to achieve sound financial health. Every form of organization incurs expenditures. Office space, legal costs, payroll, company credit cards, and other institutional expenditures may rise exponentially. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, the average cost to establish a micro-business is approximately $3,000, whereas the estimated cost to initiate a home-based franchise is almost $5,000. In addition to these one-time fees, utilities and other recurring expenses must also be paid periodically. Without being realistic about a startup's financial flow and debt, the owner will be unable to operate. In these situations, the societal obligations of a company become obsolete.

On the other hand, there is no distinction between individuals and businesses regarding their ethical responsibilities. Given that social evils are solvable, businesses should share equal accountability with governments for society's betterment. For instance, the Vietnamese YouTube channel "Quang Linh Vlogs" has received enthusiastic support from both Vietnamese and Angolans. In the recordings, Linh and his team instruct local Angolans on how to grow vegetables and raise livestock. Linh also launched a social project to assist 5,000 underprivileged children in school by renovating and equipping classrooms. They proved that it is more humanitarian for businesses to contribute to society than to maximize revenue.

In conclusion, although I agree that making money is the top priority for businesses, they should also make social contributions within their reasonable purview.

Sample 3:

Businesses have always sought to make a profit, but it is becoming increasingly common to hear people talk about the social obligations that companies have. I completely agree with the idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make money.

On the one hand, I accept that businesses must make money in order to survive in a competitive world. It seems logical that the priority of any company should be to cover its running costs, such as employees’ wages and payments for buildings and utilities. On top of these costs, companies also need to invest in improvements and innovations if they wish to remain successful. If a company is unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of customers, any concerns about social responsibilities become irrelevant. In other words, a company can only make a positive contribution to society if it is in good financial health.

On the other hand, companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximising profit; they have a wider role to play in society. One social obligation that owners and managers have is to treat their employees well, rather than exploiting them. For example, they could pay a “living wage” to ensure that workers have a good quality of life. I also like the idea that businesses could use a proportion of their profits to support local charities, environmental projects or education initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to minimise their tax payments by using accounting loopholes, I believe that company bosses should be happy to contribute to society through the tax system.

In conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their social responsibilities as they do on their financial objectives.

Sample 4:

With the enhancement of business, many believe that the owners should contribute to the world and should adhere to corporate social responsibility, while others deny this opinion. If asked personally I would agree with the former opinion.

First and foremost, it is evident that the business owners are in a position to make a huge change, this creates a better future for the whole nation. There are many issues such as hunger that need to be addressed by these people. There is a vast population who lives under the poverty line, for them, it is difficult to even have the essentials for them. The nation will crumble, and the company will soon be affected negatively. For instance, renowned businessman Bill Gates started the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) in 1988 and we witnessed the astonishing result: it has almost eradicated the problem of polio from the whole world.

On the flip side, it should not be disregarded that reinvesting in their own business will improve business as well as generate more jobs. This will indirectly strengthen the nation's economy. It is true that the magnification of a business will result in an increased amount of tax not only through the industries but also from the companies’ newly recruited or recently promoted employees.

To conclude and to summarize, it can be observed that completing corporate social responsibility will not only serve the nation but also enhance their own company. I would suggest that all business tycoons should ethically donate significant resources for the welfare of everyone. 

Sample 5:

Many believe that proprietors of large-scale industries must incorporate corporate social responsibility in their companies, while others deny this opinion. I wholeheartedly agree with the former opinion, my stance is given in the ensuing paragraphs.

To commence with, all business owners have succeeded in their life with a direct or indirect contribution to society, so it must be obvious that they should return their favor when they have the opportunity. There are many communities that support the budding start-up through supportive ideas, finance, and proffering employees, thus, they should continue this generous cycle and give back a significant amount to society when they have enough for themselves. Furthermore, they should do this as if they are investing in their own society and thus in the near future, it will likely help them back as well.

On the contrary, the economist mindset of a huge mass is likely to push these owners towards more investment in other businesses. This would increase their chances to not only survive in the industry but also make a handsome profit for themselves. This diversification is usually considered a key to the enhancement of all the sectors in which businesses operate. 

To sum up and offer my position, I would like to put forth that if businesses help the community, they will have a huge gain in the longer run, to add, they will also gain the valuable trust of the people in general. Thus, all the owners should take it upon themselves to donate a certain amount and help the nation to grow.

Sample 6:

There is a debate whether the business should have an ethical responsibility and serve the nation, or they should put their money into something else. I bolster this perception; my position is explained further with logical reasons and examples. 

To begin with, there are many ways through which a business owner can uplift society, out of which scholarship is the most popular form of aid which can be done by them. The TATA Group has many scholarships, through which they help society to grow in a direction where they can have a secured future. These scholarships even offer positions in the TATA companies where they can use the knowledge which they have gained throughout their lives and benefit the company as well. All such activities will also help to maintain respect not only in front of the employees but also in front of the general populace.

In contrast, many say that employees who work in these companies and have to spend a long time in the betterment of these industries should get benefits if the company wants to be generous. There are many employees who work religiously with the company, their efforts should not be disregarded, they should be given a token of appreciation either through promotion or through some sort of incentive.

To conclude, it can be said that if owners have magnanimous hearts, they will put their money to good use. It is true that they have enough, and they should use a bit of this to help others in all the ways possible.

Sample 7:

It is sometimes argued that businesses have many important responsibilities towards societal issues along with making money. I completely agree with this notion that corporations should be working on tackling socio-economic problems and should not only concentrate on making money.

Corporations have always been inclined towards making money. It is true that money driven approaches are fundamentally important to gain financial success. If companies or associates do not work hard to increase profitability, they would not be able to compete in the market in terms of providing more and more employment facilities to people, and eventually to help eradicate poverty. In addition, without earning enough money, businesses cannot even invest in raising social values.

However, corporations should have a duty to fulfill societal needs instead of solely striving for more and more money. Social responsibilities mean tackling global challenges. These most pressing issues include climate change, poverty, inequity and resources or water scarcity. Take Unilever, a pharmaceutical multinational company, as an example- this high-profile organization has had a profound record of giving medical or other financial aid to the most deprived people of developing countries. As a result of these holistic and intensive social measures they are becoming increasingly successful in managing and solving poverty and health related problems in respective impoverished neighbourhoods.

To sum up, while successful and profitable businesses are fundamentally important to boost the economy by generating revenues through earning more profit, social and environmental issues should also be included into their priority list of core plans.

Sample 8:

Businesses have always sought to make a profit, but it is becoming increasingly common to hear people talk about the social obligations that companies have. I completely agree with the idea that businesses should do more for society than simply make money.

On the one hand, I accept that businesses must make money in order to survive in a competitive world. It seems logical that the priority of any company should be to cover its running costs, such as employees’ wages and payments for buildings and utilities. On top of these costs, companies also need to invest in improvements and innovations if they wish to remain successful. If a company is unable to pay its bills or meet the changing needs of customers, any concerns about social responsibilities become irrelevant. In other words, a company can only make a positive contribution to society if it is in good financial health.

On the other hand, companies should not be run with the sole aim of maximising profit; they have a wider role to play in society. One social obligation that owners and managers have is to treat their employees well, rather than exploiting them. For example, they could pay a “living wage” to ensure that workers have a good quality of life. I also like the idea that businesses could use a proportion of their profits to support local charities, environmental projects or education initiatives. Finally, instead of trying to minimize their tax payments by using accounting loopholes, I believe that company bosses should be happy to contribute to society through the tax system.

In conclusion, I believe that companies should place as much importance on their social responsibilities as they do on their financial objectives.

Sample 9:

Many socially conscious public figures have called on businesses to show greater responsibility to the societies they depend on. In my opinion, the responsibility of a business towards society extends to ethical management of their own operations but not to areas largely outside their purview.

Large and small businesses are no different from individuals and have the same obligation to be ethical. Every business, conducting themselves in a just manner, will contribute greatly to the betterment of society. A local grocery shop that pays its workers a living wage, charges fair prices, keeps accurate books, and sells quality food taken in aggregate with stores around the country, produces innumerable benefits for both staff and patrons. Large companies are no exception. If Apple pays employees well and builds quality products while adhering to environmental and economic regulations, they will make the world a better place. In contrast, companies without moral compass like Enron, Purdue and Facebook exact a heavy toll on society in exchange for their services.

However, companies should not be forced to take responsibility for greater societal ills unless they are in some way culpable. A good example of this relates to education. The education of children and adolescents is the foundation of a stable, content society. Responsibility for education lies squarely with governments and parents, notwithstanding some private enterprise schools. If a company comes in direct contact with a school, for example by selling them textbooks, then the company is responsible for the quality of their products. If they pollute nearby land and students get sick, the company should bear full responsibility as well. In all other matters not under their direct influence, parents and governments take on the sole burden of care.

In conclusion, businesses are only in contact with certain aspects of society, and they should not be asked to assume a full burden of responsibility. As free market companies become larger and supplant national governments this may require re-examination.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, it is widely argued that not only should businesses operate with the sole aim of gaining profits, but they also ought to fulfill certain social obligations. Personally, I totally agree with this belief and will present the reasons for my opinion in the following essay.

The first rationale behind my agreement with the initial statement is that socially responsible companies are more likely to attract high-quality job candidates and bolster the current workforce’s loyalty. This is because the majority of workers nowadays are highly aware of pressing social issues, such as climate change or human rights, and desire to play a part in resolving these. In other words, contemporary employees tend to prefer enterprises with constant social obligations where they can seek fulfillment in contributing to social development. For instance, via an anti-racial campaign which highlighted and condemned the injustices incurred by black people, Google, a global giant corporation, has successfully appealed to a substantial number of qualified applicants and reinforced the commitment as well as loyalty of current employees.

Another reason why I believe businesses should undertake social duties is that they can gain tremendous benefits in terms of the brand image and income. Specifically, companies which take part in important social activities, such as environmental conservation or gender equality campaigns, are likely to earn huge public support and considerably promote its brand recognition among the masses, subsequently leading to a wider range of customers and investors. To illustrate, Lego, a famous toy manufacturer, has orientated itself towards initiatives and missions that aim to help children, the environment and local communities since the very first day of its foundation. As a result, Lego is presently enjoying the status of the most reputable company in the world with significantly higher amounts of income from global customers than those of many other famous ones.

In conclusion, besides primary financial targets, I believe that businesses should also take some social responsibilities for a variety of benefits mentioned above.

Sample 1:

It is true that international sports events such as the Olympic games and Football World Cup are often deemed exorbitant million-dollar investments. Due to the enormous budgets required, opinions are divided on whether countries should not spend money on hosting such events or whether it is beneficial to do the opposite. While I understand the rationale behind the former view, I still strongly advocate the latter.

Granted, those who believe it is wasteful to hold international sports events may point to the massive funding required to build a large number of stadiums and sports facilities to serve varied types of games. These construction projects could incur multi-billion-dollar expenses, yet many of them could quickly fall into disrepair or be left abandoned as the events end. However, organizers of modern sporting events have successfully addressed such concerns by inventing mobile stadiums which can be effortlessly deployed in diverse countries along with turning stadiums into multi-purpose venues. Regarding the former, a remarkable example can be observed in Qatar, where stadiums were ingeniously constructed using containers for the 2022 World Cup. These sports facilities can be installed and dismantled with ease, making it possible to transport them to any destination to be reused and thus save colossal budgets. In addition, many countries also attempt to make stadiums versatile by transforming them into social hubs, meaning that they are not only places for sports matches but also venues for a diverse array of events ranging from live concerts, ceremonies, and so on.

From my perspective, international sports events are of paramount importance and hence undoubtedly worth investment. The reason for this is that host countries could reap a myriad of financial benefits because of a boom in tourism during these events. Flocks of tourists and audiences from countries all over the world would pay a visit to the countries, leading to a steep growth in the demands for various goods and services, including lodging and transportation. In addition to the monetary merits, world sports competitions and tournaments could also provide many intangible values, including the promotion of sportsmanship and a sense of community. Indeed, events such as the World Cup or the Olympic Games provide a valuable opportunity for outstanding athletes from all corners of the world to compete and demonstrate the beauty of different sports while spectators could have enjoyable experiences with their friends and families or even strangers supporting their favorite teams.

In conclusion, while some may oppose the idea of holding sports events on an international scale, I still hold the belief that such events provide multifaceted advantages which far outweigh the costs, making them a worthwhile endeavor.

Sample 2:

Organizing international sporting extravaganzas like the Olympic Games or the FIFA World Cup undoubtedly demands substantial financial investments. While some argue that such expenditures are wasteful, others contend that they bring considerable benefits to the host country. This essay will thoroughly discuss both viewpoints before concluding that I am in favor of the former.

Admittedly, proponents of hosting international sports events may argue that the benefits outweigh the costs. The key rationale behind this thinking is that these events can significantly boost a nation's tourism industry, stimulate local economies, and create numerous job opportunities. For example, the 2016 Rio Olympics drew millions of tourists, injecting billions into the Brazilian economy and providing thousands of jobs in the process. This underscores the belief that hosting such events can be a sound economic investment. 

However, I side with those who claim that the organization of global sports events is not a prudent financial investment. This is because the exorbitant costs associated with constructing state-of-the-art stadiums and upgrading infrastructure can place an immense strain on a nation's budget. For example, the 2004 Athens Olympics left Greece grappling with significant debt due to overspending on infrastructure projects, burdening the country's finances for years to come. Additionally, global-scale sports events often result in underutilized facilities once they conclude, giving rise to maintenance expenses that further drain public funds. This can be seen in the case of the 2016 Rio Olympics, where some venues were left unused, necessitating ongoing maintenance funded by taxpayers. The unfulfilled promise of repurposing these facilities for community use exacerbates the financial strain on the host city.

In conclusion, I feel that hosting international sports events is often a wasteful financial endeavor. While there are potential benefits, the enormous costs, long-term financial burdens, and underutilized amenities typically overshadow these gains.

Sample 3:

International sporting events have become increasingly common in recent decades. While some people reckon that host countries might have to deal with a sudden surge in crime or involve themselves in an exhausting preparation process, more importantly I believe they can take the opportunity to boost tourism.

To begin with, although events such as these are a great opportunity for countries to gain global exposure, there are present significant challenges. Firstly, records have shown that there is a twofold increase in crimes such as prostitution and petty theft when a country organises an event such as the World Cup or the Olympics. Furthermore, the process of preparing for these events is often demanding. For the World Cup 2014, it took Brazil five years to revitalise its cities and construct various facilities including stadiums and indoor athletics arenas to meet the world-class standard set by FIFA.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that international sporting games can potentially stimulate the tourism sector. By being the host, a country is able to attract a large array of athletes and their supporters from all around the world. This sudden increase in visitors will likely proliferate the sales of products and services such as accommodation and transportation within the period of the events. In the longer term, it is a great chance for the host nations to promote their culture on a global stage. For example, since the pictures of beautifully garnished Vietnamese dishes made headlines during the SEA Games in 2003, Vietnam has been branded as the “Kitchen of the world” and a must visit destination for global food lovers. This obviously does wonders for the Vietnamese economy.

In conclusion, although sports events come at the expense of a few immediate problems, the benefits of boosted gross sales and cultural promotion are of greater significance. In my opinion, host nations can also consider the option of sharing an event with a neighboring country to spread the risk and still enjoy the lucrative long-term benefits.

Sample 4:

Hosting major international sports events like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup comes with a significant financial commitment. While some argue that these expenses are extravagant, others believe that hosting such events brings a multitude of advantages. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Advocates contend that the costs associated with hosting these events are justified due to the potential economic benefits they bring. Organizing a major sports event draws in tourists, stimulates local businesses, creates job opportunities, and encourages infrastructure development. Moreover, it showcases the host country’s culture, heritage, and capabilities to the world, leading to global recognition. Consequently, these events can act as drivers for economic growth, leaving a lasting positive impact on the host nation.

Detractors argue that the resources earmarked for hosting these events could be better utilized for critical social issues like education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. They posit that the short-term financial gains may not outweigh the long-term costs, as the infrastructure built for these events may become underused or unsustainable after the event concludes. Critics also assert that the resources invested could be redirected towards addressing more immediate and essential needs of the populace.

In conclusion, I believe that hosting major international sports events can be a beneficial investment, provided there is careful planning and consideration of long-term benefits. While it is imperative to ensure that funds are judiciously allocated and that the event leaves a lasting legacy, the potential economic, cultural, and social benefits should not be disregarded.

Sample 5:

Many people are divided over having a sports tournament for international competitors occurring in their country. While some believe that money is wasted in hosting it, others believe the event’s benefits justify its costs. Although these justifications seem reasonable, I am inclined to express my disapproval toward this decision.

Organizing global sporting events might not be a wasteful venture. Certainly, new jobs will be created, particularly those in the construction and service industries. The former is expected to need more workers to build sporting facilities and lodging for the arriving athletes, while the latter obviously demands more hospitality providers for the sports tourists. Altogether, this results in a higher income overall for the population. Another point of note is that hosting international sports tournaments produces an opportunity to improve a country’s recognizability on the global stage. Such events, it is claimed, may leave lasting impressions in foreign visitors and allow a nation’s tourism industry to flourish for many years to come. The values created from organizing these events seem significant enough to justify the decision.

However, I firmly believe that a nation is squandering its wealth by hosting international sporting events. The expenses involved in such an endeavor, from lobbying for the rights to host to constructing sporting facilities, are massive to the point of extravagance. As a consequence, the home government incurs an exorbitant amount of debt, which ultimately falls to the taxpayers to foot the bill. After a tournament has concluded, meanwhile, the constructed facilities might end up a waste as well. This is likely the case for the host of Olympic-style events, as arenas and sports complexes for less popular disciplines fall into disuse. Even when they are used, the purpose is usually particular, and the public, as usual, has to pay for their maintenance. It is hence reasonable to oppose the holding of international sports tournaments.

In conclusion, organizing sports events for athletes from all over the globe is largely a waste of money, and can be one of the worst financial decisions a nation can make. Any government which likes to explore the possibility of doing so, in my opinion, would need a good reason for it.

Sample 6:

Opinions differ on whether hosting international sporting events is advantageous or disadvantageous for the host nation. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own standpoint.

It is conceivable that staging global sporting events may pose challenges for the host country. For instance, the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Russia serves as a compelling illustration. The country made a substantial investment in constructing sports stadiums to meet FIFA’s stringent requirements, resulting in a significant financial burden on the government. Once the event concluded, many of these venues were left unused, leading to ongoing maintenance costs and draining government resources. This could potentially lead to budget deficits, increased taxes, or reduced social welfare programs, thereby negatively impacting the country’s overall economic health.

Conversely, international sports events have the potential to create opportunities for the host nation, particularly in the tourism sector. These events often attract a large influx of international tourists, showcasing the host country’s cultural heritage, including its culinary traditions. This surge in tourism can generate employment opportunities for local residents and stimulate economic growth. Furthermore, by enhancing the country’s global image, the event can contribute to the overall development of sports and, consequently, the economy.

Taking into consideration the aforementioned points, while hosting global sports events may have adverse effects on a country, especially without prudent governmental oversight, I am firmly of the opinion that when managed effectively, these events can serve as a catalyst for a nation’s prosperity by showcasing its unique heritage and attracting international visitors.

Sample 7:

Hosting international sports events can incur a significant expense for a country. While some argue that such costs are a waste of resources, others believe there are invaluable benefits attached. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and provide my own viewpoint on the matter.

Opponents of hosting global sports events often cite financial burdens as their primary concern. They argue that the initial investments, often running into billions, may not always ensure a profitable return. The 2016 Olympics in Rio, for instance, left Brazil with a considerable debt and underused facilities. Additionally, prioritizing sports can divert funds from more critical sectors like education or health, potentially stalling development in these areas.

Conversely, advocates highlight the numerous advantages of such events. Hosting sports competitions can significantly boost a nation’s image, portraying it as a global player in the world arena. Moreover, these events often draw tourists, promoting local businesses and generating substantial revenue. The 2012 London Olympics, for example, witnessed a surge in tourism and boosted the local economy, with job creation in various sectors.

In my opinion, while the costs are indeed substantial, the potential long-term benefits of hosting such events can outweigh the initial expenses. However, countries should meticulously plan and ensure that funds are judiciously utilized, guaranteeing a lasting positive impact.

Sample 8:

Hosting international events like the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup costs a significant amount of money, which some people believe is a waste of resources. Others argue that these events are not wasteful because they elevate a country's global standing, especially for developing nations. This essay will discuss both perspectives.

On one hand, countries hosting large-scale events have the opportunity to showcase their hospitality to the world, which benefits their tourism industry. These events are broadcast globally, providing insight into the host country to people around the world. For instance, Dubai recently hosted the Indian Premier League, a cricket tournament typically held in India. By inviting sponsors and hosting the event, Dubai boosted its international tourism profile, as cricket is followed by many worldwide. Thus, organizing events of international stature can be beneficial for countries.

On the other hand, hosting worldwide events involves enormous costs, which may not be sustainable for all nations. Events that invite people from around the world require expenses for accommodation, transport, and food, which can be extremely high and could otherwise be used for the development of the country. For example, India spent close to 6,500 crore rupees on hosting the 2019 Olympics, funds that could have been used to create more job opportunities for the unemployed, as India ranks high in global unemployment rates. Therefore, proper allocation of resources is essential, and developing nations should consider avoiding hosting such costly events.

In conclusion, while hosting international events can enhance a country's global position, developing countries need to carefully consider their resource allocation before committing to such expensive endeavors.

Sample 1:

In recent years, there has been a substantial rise in the number of displaced individuals worldwide. Many have been compelled to leave their homes and families due to factors such as war and insecurity, seeking a more supportive and secure environment. It is my belief that affluent nations could alleviate the plight of these individuals by offering them refuge and essential assistance, as well as relaxing their border restrictions.

One compelling reason for wealthier nations to provide these provisions is to mitigate the risk of crime. This is attributable to the fact that these individuals, as immigrants, may encounter challenges in securing employment after fleeing their home countries due to conflict. Faced with the imperative of providing for themselves and their families, they may resort to theft or other criminal activities if adequate support is not extended to them. For instance, the United Kingdom witnessed a marked surge in crime following an influx of immigrants from Ukraine in 2022, largely due to a lack of support for them. Consequently, the British government initiated a monthly allowance for many of these refugees to facilitate their integration while they seek employment.

Another compelling argument for my strong endorsement of the idea that affluent countries should assist asylum seekers is that it can engender diversity in society, which can, in turn, bolster the economy. A significant proportion of displaced individuals possess expertise in various fields, such as engineering, healthcare, commerce, and industry. Furthermore, they represent diverse ethnic groups, as the causes of their displacement, such as war, famine, and disease, are indiscriminate in their impact. Therefore, hosting nations stand to benefit from the skills and knowledge of the refugees, while also enriching their local communities with new cultures and traditions. Countries with well-established Humanitarian Acceptance Programs (HAP) like the UK, the USA, Canada, and Australia have reaped substantial gains from their benevolence in resettling asylum seekers within their borders.

In conclusion, I maintain that nations endowed with significant wealth should accommodate a greater number of refugees. This, in turn, would curtail instances of theft and other crimes, while also facilitating economic prosperity through the enhancement of diversity within host nations.

Sample 2:

It is a reality that because of war, brutality, and persecution, millions of people were forcibly ejected from their homes. Like many others, I feel that these migrants should be welcomed by rich countries that have ample resources to meet their basic needs, namely shelter and food.
First and foremost, refugees are people who are seeking asylum because their home nations do not provide a safe environment, even if it's not their fault. Due to the human rights law, it is morally the duty of other countries to care for them. Richer nations should take this step in particular because they are the ones who utilise the majority of the world's natural resources. Even if it isn't happening right now, exploitation has been a common occurrence in recent history, and wealthy nations have benefited a lot from it. For instance, despite having abundant natural resources that were once controlled by Europe, Africa is experiencing poverty and a water shortage.
Furthermore, weaker political regions typically lack the resources necessary to fund the welfare benefits for their own residents. For example, despite Turkey having the largest population in the world, the government is unable to provide for all of its citizens' fundamental needs. Therefore, a large portion of them is begging for food on the streets. A residence, money, and even free schooling are provided for refugees in certain other nations, such as Australia. These people can develop themselves and become assets to society owing to their wealthier circumstances.
To sum up, I think wealthy nations should accept refugees because they have the ability to help these individuals reconcile by providing for their basic needs. They also need to share the energy they have earned through exploiting the earth's natural resources with other people living on the planet.

Sample 3:

It is argued that countries with strong economies should accept more refugees and provide them with basic necessities such as food and accommodation. This essay completely agrees with the statement because it is morally right to support those who have fled their war-torn homeland. Additionally, it could be beneficial for host countries in the long term, as these people represent an additional labour force.

It is totally right to help others in severe cases, such as natural disasters or wars. It would be cruel to merely observe displaced people suffering rather than lending a hand. Moreover, before nations became wealthy, they underwent numerous difficulties related to political instability and other circumstances. Consequently, they have gained valuable experience that could be applied. For example, the European Union has ample resources to assist refugees with food and housing issues, thereby making adaptation smoother.

Countries that provide shelter for foreigners could experience a significant benefit. The individuals sheltered will be integrated into economies, resulting in an increase in job openings, higher employment rates, and more taxes paid. Overall, this will definitely stimulate GDP growth. For instance, the immigration policy of the US was relatively soft, and many refugees were hosted during the last 50 decades; today, the country has one of the strongest economies in the world because of the high contribution of labour market expansion.

In conclusion, it is morally right to show great compassion and assist with the basic needs of those who suffer from natural catastrophes or war conflicts. Furthermore, in the long run, wealthy countries will be able to benefit from this support, resulting in expansion of the labour market.

Sample 4:

It is argued that countries with high incomes have to allow a larger number of refugees to cross their borders. I completely agree with this statement because it is morally correct and beneficial for their economies in the long term.

It is not adequate just to watch other nations suffering from being deprived of food and safety. Wealthy states are capable of helping those who require this help. War, hunger, and other negative circumstances happen all the time around the world. Rich states have well-developed agricultural and construction sectors, so it should not be challenging to provide a "safety net" to displaced people. For example, many European regions were involved in the biggest migration crisis in the past decade, and provided shelter to millions of foreigners, showing a good example of humanity.

Besides being cheerful, a positive effect of migration can be achieved. Some of those who had to leave their homeland will start settling down, opening businesses, and becoming a labour force in the end. In addition to that, it will be quite beneficial for economies over a long distance, because a lot of new jobs will appear leading to an increase in incomes for local areas, and it can boost economic growth overall. One of the prominent examples is the migration policy of the USA; people from abroad were accepted, sheltered, and allowed to open businesses thereby increasing the country's GDP.

In conclusion, from an ethical point of view nations have to support each other and provide all the necessary stuff like food or accommodations for refugees. Moreover, this movement can be paid back in advance by those who were adopted, resulting in an upward trend in the labour market.

Sample 5:

It is argued that rich nations should open the door to more people who have fled their homes from wars or natural disasters and provide them with food and shelter. This essay completely disagrees with this statement because it will put a strain on the host countries’ financial and social security.

The first reason why developed countries should limit the number of evacuees entering their homeland is that states have to share their budget in order to accommodate those immigrants. This is to say that the local residents could receive fewer social welfare payments and services than they should have had. Moreover, a considerable amount of money from governments is also allocated for providing necessities for these foreign displaced people. For example, during the Iraq civil war which started some years ago, hundreds of thousands of refugees fled to the neighbouring country Iran, costing this host millions of dollars in humanitarian activities. The same situation repeated in Finland when the Ukraine war broke out last year and Helsinki had to spend a considerable part of its budget on refugee camps while tightening the purse strings on public services and social assistance to its citizens.

The second reason for objecting to the opinion of allowing more refugees is its long-term ramifications on society. This is because most of them are poor or illiterate people who completely live on humanitarian aid. As a result, they not only fail to contribute to the host country but also create more potential conflicts and crimes in local areas. For instance, a Finnish study reports a higher rate of crimes such as thieves, prostitution, drugs and violence in areas where refugee camps are located. As it requires local authorities substantial time and effort to settle this community, such situations persist and make local inhabitants feel insecure when going out.

To conclude, too many refugees entering their territory could be a burden for even wealthy nations for both financial and social reasons.

Sample 6:

It is argued that rich nations should allow more refugees to enter their borders and support them with food and shelter. This essay completely agrees with the above view because rich states have enough resources to enforce, and these communities are fleeing from their lands that are affected by war and famine.

The main reason developed countries should take more displaced people is that they have the financial ability to do so. Countries like Germany, the UK and the USA have huge budgets that they collect in the form of tax from their citizens and companies operating in their territory. It would only take a tiny fraction of their wealth to accommodate and feed millions of poorer people. For instance, it is estimated that the European Union’s combined GDP is over $18 trillion, and all of the Syrian refugees could be resettled for less than a billion dollars. Therefore, developed nationals should aid the world's needy community.

Wealthy nations are obliged to have a moral obligation because evacuees are trying to enter their land because their homes have been ruined by war and hunger. Moreover, no one wants to leave their homeland with their families unless it is essential to do so and if Western nationals refuse to take them in, they will certainly be in danger of losing their lives. For example, the public from Syria have no food and are often caught in the middle of full-scale battles and that is indeed the main reason why nearly 5 million of them have escaped. Hence, developed nations must aid in communities of war-stricken populations.

In conclusion, affluent states should help to resettle refugees because they can afford to do so and it will help save lives of the fellow human beings, and so I completely agree with the question statement.

Sample 7:

Rich nations must welcome many asylum seekers and support their welfare. I totally agree with this statement because they have the resources and helping refugees is an act of kindness that prevents harm to them. These issues are discussed below.

First, wealthy countries are more than capable of accepting and supporting refuge seeking persons with their healthy national budgets. It would not hurt their economies to do so. They equally would continue to satisfy their citizens. For example, despite so many distressed persons flowing into Italy from different regions of the world, the country was recently listed as one of the richest and their citizens the second happiest globally.

Secondly, aiding those that appeal for asylum is not only a demonstration of how kind the developed states can be, but it also helps to reduce fatalities all over the universe. Many people have been injured and died in situations that could have been prevented had someone willingly offered. For instance, in South Sudan, many children starve and or become deceased owing to the limited number of NGOs that work in that conflict-stricken area. These are instances where the rich can become useful.

In conclusion, I completely concur with the view that wealthy nations should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance. Doing likewise is a noble act of humility that can save lives and nevertheless, the advanced states of the world can afford it. These and other issues have been addressed at length by this essay to justify its position.

Sample 8:

Some people argue that prosperous nations should take in more refugees, supporting them with food and shelter. In this essay, I am going to explain why I strongly agree with this argument due to the seriousness of this issue and then demonstrate how refugees can collaborate with the countries that accepted these new residents.

Firstly, I think that is morally expected for rich countries to help displaced persons.   Unfortunately, these migrants run away from their own land because they suffer from serious problems there, such as civil wars. In many cases, they are deeply desperate, and they do not have other plausible options rather than look for new opportunities far away from their hometown to stay alive. One example is a Syrian child found dead on a Mexican beach after an unsuccessful swimming crossing. This terrible case provoked a global commotion and many requests for humanitarian support coming from the first world.

On top of that, displaced persons can boost the labour force in wealthy countries. Many of these nations have been facing the problem of decreasing the birth rate. As result, these populations are being more ageing, compromising the workforce available. Therefore, foreign residents can provide positive benefits for them. A study from Oxford University demonstrated that Europe has the lowest birth rate around the world. Apart from that, this research evidenced that it will be necessary for two current workers to maintain financially one retired individual in the next decades.

In conclusion, I reiterate my opinion that prosperous nations should welcome as many refugees as they can because this is a serious question that demands ethical and moral measures urgently. Moreover, these new residents can occupy employments available, helping to maintain the local economy in well-developed regions.

Sample 9:

In our turbulent time, many people from poor or warring countries have been immigrating as refugees to rich countries. As a result, host states have more and more problems with unemployment, a criminal level and diminishes of the local economy. Hence, I can partly agree with the topic statement on account of various reasons that I describe below.

First of all, few people can deny the fact that people in troubles need to help, especially if you have capabilities to it; thereby, wealthy countries, on the surface, would have to accept as many refugees as they could with all assistance that such states could give. People from poor African countries or peaceful citizens belligerent one, for example, do not have another way except run away to other countries, which steadier. Moreover, rich countries always have shortage in lower position workers that can fill in by refugees. Thus, at the first glance wealthy countries would have to accept as many as possible refugees, in order to profit for a local economy and a job market.

Nevertheless, the plethora of evidence demonstrates that the help of refugees brings not only profits, but also many problems. It has been noticed in host countries, for instance, that not all refugees want and can work that leads to increasing levels of unemployment and permanent compensation, which drains the budget. Furthermore, many arrived people have various diseases that could spread in host countries. Likewise, wealthy countries have poor or people who need housing and food too, especially after weather disasters. Consequently, the government of each country would have to decide independently about the possible number of refugees.

To conclude, the undeniable fact is that many people in different countries today, owing to various reasons, need to run away from their country to become wealthy, and receive help. However, I cannot wholeheartedly accept the opinion that rich countries should accept and help refugees because much evidence demonstrates that such a view leads to the controversial future of the host country.

Sample 1:

Natural disasters are distressing for people and the government. Media agencies seem to play their significant role in capturing attention in dealing with such issues and the aftereffects. Regarding the question of whether the individual needs training to counter such effects, I completely disagree due to the fact such events need capable resources, which are usually beyond the capacity of the common people.

To begin with, the government should encourage better funding and investment for infrastructure in the form of disaster-resistant buildings and overpasses. This means that there will be a minimum number of casualties, resulting from the collision of high-rise constructions. For instance, laws in Japan prohibit constructions, which are not able to survive earthquakes of minimum magnitudes. Consequently, surviving techniques, training and relevant equipment must be in the possession of people, in dealing with the aftereffects of a disaster.

Furthermore, disasters are sometimes not forecasted and happen suddenly, meaning that people will not be aware of the happening or the consequences. In such situations, the state or its funding agencies can play a valuable part. For instance, in Pakistan, various NGOs contributed, in the form of shelter, health care facilities and food supplies for the survivors of an earthquake in 2005. This means that only training could not be helpful, as people were struggling with a wide variety of circumstances.

In conclusion, while sufficient knowledge is required to overcome the effects of natural calamities, the macro level strategies with micro-level initiatives by the government are necessary to counter such effects, as they seem to have a significant effect in saving lives.

Sample 2:

Governments are too sensitive to attention-grabbing tragedies like earthquakes and floods, while some opponents believe that they are not important in comparison with obstacles around our neighbourhoods. Actually, they do not know those disasters cause mass killings.

Allocating a budget and resources to increase the public knowledge about different actions during these kinds of disasters can save lots of lives. Because they are considered serious threats and will kill lots of people. For instance, in the last year, a huge earthquake happened in Turkey. Unfortunately, the number of people who were hurt was high due to a lack of knowledge. As a result, if the government tried to teach them so many people would be alive today.

Additionally, when a disaster hits a country with weak infrastructure, for sure, the damage will be huge. Therefore, authorities should spend an adequate amount of money to renew and rebuild cities to save people’s lives. For example, Japan is an obvious sample that shows how much giving attention to these events is crucial. Every year, they face severe earthquakes with no damage because all buildings in this area are built floating. So they will not be devastated during disasters. In this case, not only government’s attention will prevent people from dying, but also, they can make secure and safe places for their population.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that in our living areas, there would be lots of threats, but big disasters will make more dangerous situations. So, it is vital to persuade governments to use their resources to make people more knowledgeable about how they should act in these times.

Sample 3:

It is sometimes argued whether governments should make citizens aware of any possible situation they are facing and educate them on what to do when a sudden disaster occurred. I completely agree with this idea.

On the one hand, some people might argue that with the rapid growth of global warming and climate change, natural disasters can be unpredictable and varied, so it is difficult to train each and every citizen on how to face that. For example, Henan, a province of China, suffered from devastating floods on July 2021, because of a rare torrential rain that occurred. Passengers were trapped in the subway, and the floods caused landslides and overwhelmed dams and rivers. Even if the government has educated people to mind any signs before floods or what to do when floods occurred, the severity of the floods still makes it impossible for local residents to react.

On the other hand, it is important for individuals to know what was happening all over the world and how to deal with all kinds of disasters, whether the disaster is common in your country or not. For instance, since earthquakes are a frequent phenomenon in Japan, the Government of Japan have put much effort into teaching children and teenagers what to do when an earthquake happens. By doing this, the Japanese would not panic during earthquakes, instead, they know exactly what to do and are calm to face this kind of natural disaster.

In conclusion, I believe that it is the government's responsibility to educate citizens about the risks they are facing near their homeland, while it is also vital to learn how to react no matter what kind of disaster is.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, news headline-grabbing disasters more and more make people feel unsafe instead of bringing the actual headline that educated the people. Headline news such as earthquakes and floods bring fear among the residents, moreover, there is no education from the government to bring understanding to the middle of civilians. I totally agree that educating people to understand the risk they face nearer to home must do, furthermore, it will help to reduce fatality during disasters.

Firstly, the news companies always bring fascinating headlines during disasters on purpose to make it more interesting. In some cases, the news isn't credible at all, such as the picture from another case of disaster. It will get more attention from the readers; however, the point of view will be different from those who face the disasters directly. For example, for citizens under mount Merapi when the mount erupted in 2012, the news brings the eruption is very dangerous and there is no safe place instead so moved to downtown Yogyakarta. Some of the people were evacuated to the city, while another chooses to stay because of feeling hopeless.

On the other hand, there is no education on the way to evacuate the civilians. In this case, the government must take charge of giving the citizens an understanding of the danger. For instance, to know the sign of disasters and also the effect after them. This education must be understood by the people, and they will know the path to evacuation. There is a lot of induction in Indonesia, called as Ring of Fire, by mean, Indonesia will always face natural disasters till the end. In this condition, the citizens must force the government to educate them and save more lives.

In conclusion, the news companies will always make interesting headline-grabbing disasters, in a way to increase the reader. However, Indonesian civilians must be educated by the government and understand how to face disasters instead to believe in the news directly.

Sample 1:

Technology advancements have made it simple for us to obtain information and entertainment while driving. This is also true in terms of books. As eBooks gain popularity, more people are converting from traditional reading techniques to modern methods. We will show throughout this article that the introduction of eBooks has both advantages and disadvantages, just like other things.

First, let's discuss the advantages of e-books. The advent of eBooks has made it feasible to read while on the go because all you need is a steady internet connection. Additionally, a reader for the content on such a tablet is small enough to put in a person's bag. Second, because there are so many choices accessible, you are not required to stick with a book you feel is not to your taste. An example of an eBook is the release of the Amazon Kindle, which may be purchased from Amazon directly. Books are available for users to purchase at reasonable prices and read whenever they like. They are not concerned about the time limits that libraries impose on book borrowing. Last but not least, another element that attracts potential readers is the constant accessibility of literature.

Let us now look at the disadvantages. One of the major drawbacks of eBooks is that they need a lot of screen time, which over time could damage your eyes. Additionally, a gadget that you can use to read books will be necessary, and that device runs on batteries. Consequently, you will purchase more batteries. Additionally, since this is an online service, the risk of corrupted and lost files is higher. Not to mention that many people enjoy reading paperback novels because they are robust and give them a sense of completion.

To conclude, I believe that eBooks are becoming increasingly popular among the younger population and are encouraging more people to read. even if only on the internet.

Sample 2:

E-book downloads are starting to alter how information is produced, shared, and seen. As technology advances, nothing is left untouched, including paper. Even while businesses struggle with piracy and the short life of e-books, individuals will benefit from an eco-friendly and free shipping option. This article will go over both the advantages and disadvantages of e-books.

There are two main benefits to reading electronic books as opposed to hard copies. First of all, it has a much less negative influence on the environment, because we don't have to cut down trees. The demand for paper books has decreased by about 30% since the introduction of e-books, according to a survey conducted by Australian universities. Second, these books are simply downloadable from servers or accessible online using a small device. People do not have to spend more money than they have to on shipping and handling. According to one study, reading and downloading books online outpaced receiving them in hard copy by 36%. In general, e-books are superior to traditional books because of their slight impact on deforestation and affordability.

On the other hand, it is impossible to ignore the drawbacks as well. piracy is the main issue. The publishers and authors of those works are at odds with the illegally obtained copies. Even though patent rights have been introduced, this is still a big problem today. For instance, the majority of developing nations choose to use pirated versions of certain publications since they cannot afford them.

In conclusion, e-books are becoming more and more popular. While piracy and data upkeep are undoubtedly problems for some people. They have contributed to the fundamental benefits by being eco-friendly and affordable. As a result, it is anticipated that global sales will increase quickly in the coming years.

Sample 3:

The world has undoubtedly been taken over by technology in the twenty-first century. Newsprint usage has decreased recently as a result of the widespread use of electronic books. While some people disagree, others think this is a positive trend. Both the advantages and disadvantages of this movement will be covered in this essay.

Convenience is this process' primary benefit. You can quickly search for and download e-books onto your smartphone or iPad. While you're on the bus or in a train car, you have access to read them. However, you do not need to transport bulky papers wherever you go. Simply put, it is at your fingertips. Furthermore, it is economical. It won't be as expensive to read an entire book series online as it would be to purchase them. For instance, I was able to read the entire Vampire Diaries series in a matter of weeks since I did so using an electronic app. Therefore, the main advantages of employing online stories are convenience and cost savings.

However, there are significant disadvantages to this procedure. Such as the increase in time spent on mobile devices and the difficulty of reading in bright light. The amount of time spent on screens will increase, which may harm certain people's vision. Additionally, using online gadgets during the day is challenging. Additionally, studying online does not give you the same sense of accomplishment as reading a book. For instance, research conducted at the University of London revealed that 75% of readers who use electronic devices do not feel satisfied after reading. As a result, reading on more electronic devices might be unhealthy, and reading outside in the sun is challenging.

In conclusion, despite the trend toward using electronic books being practical and cost-effective. There are a few drawbacks, such as the inability to read in direct sunlight and the possibility of developing health problems.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards using electronic books, raising many discussions among the public. Although many might suggest this trend is a positive development, there are not without drawbacks of using e-books that should not be neglected.

On the one hand, reading books on electronic devices can have many benefits. One of them is helping readers save a great amount of money. This stems from the fact that prices of printed books are often higher than e-books as there are costs of publishing. Another benefit could be that readers can carry thousands of books beside them while all they need to do is to have an e-reader or an electronic device. For example, possessing a Kindle, one of the most popular electronic devices for reading, can allow readers to not only have access to a huge online library with different kinds of books all around the world but also bring them to everywhere they want.

On the other hand, there are also several detrimental effects of using e-books. What appears the most obvious is to put a strain on the readers’ eyes. Since electronic devices emit blue light from their screens, if readers use them excessively for reading purposes, they would have a higher tendency to suffer from short sight. Furthermore, there are feelings that only reading paper books can give. In fact, many avid readers agree that holding a hardcover book, flipping through its pages, or even just smelling the book can bring them joy and fulfillment, which is lacking in digital books.

In conclusion, despite the fact that the emergence and development of e-books have brought many benefits to readers, there are still several drawbacks that need to be put into consideration.

Sample 5:

With the advent of the electronic age, the practice of reading books online has increasingly become popular among so many people. On the other hand, many people still have the same affection for paper-based books. This essay discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the increasing trend of reading e-books.

There are several merits associated with electronic books. Firstly, e-books have pulled out the need to carry along paper books wherever a person goes. In fact, one can have access to thousands of e-books at one time that’s too at a minimal cost. The next best part of reading books online is that it is very easy to find the right book to read simply by searching the type of content one wants to read within fractions of a second. Apart from this, it is usual that a library and a bookshop may not contain all the books, however, the internet has every book available on it. Most importantly, e-books are environment-friendly since hundreds of trees are cut down on a daily basis for making paper.

On the other hand, when it comes to the disadvantages of e-books, it is difficult to read a book for a longer time on the internet because it puts a strain on the eyes and causes problems like headache and hypertension. Secondly, it is impossible to develop the same connection with e-books as that of traditional books because one cannot touch and feel the papers of the book. Especially, elder people especially do not like reading books online.

In conclusion, I believe that the rising trend of e-books has more merits than its demerits. Instant availability and convenience to read anywhere are the two significant features of e-books.

Sample 6:

It is quite common these days for the rise of e-books and the decline in paper books. There is a common belief that this is a positive development, although some may disagree. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why the increasing popularity of e-books and the diminishing use of paper books can be beneficial. Readers only need to pay for internet access to access a wide variety of available e-books. Another contributing factor is the convenience for readers to access e-books anywhere using a smartphone or tablet.

On the other hand, there are several disadvantages associated with the growing prevalence of e-books and the decline of paper books. One evident drawback is that excessive e-book reading can contribute to eye problems due to the harmful light emitted by the screens of smartphones or tablets. Indeed, in the present era, accessing and reading numerous e-books on the internet is facile; however, a considerable portion of them infringe on copyright.

In conclusion, while the rise of e-books may offer advantages, the decline in paper books should not be overlooked due to its potential negative consequences.

Sample 7:

E-books are gaining widespread popularity in recent years, and thus causing the decline in paper books. Many people consider it a positive development while others do not. This essay will delineate its positive and negative aspects.

There are some considerable advantages to digital books. For a start, they are eco-friendly. That is to say that these digital books are not made out of trees, and thus avoiding paper pollution. Apart from this, another decisive benefit is that e-books are portable. In simple words, people can carry several books with them, without having to make any effort. Books are there with them on their device. This means that an entire library is at their fingertips. Readers have access to reading e-books when they are at home or even while travelling. Most importantly, e-books do not have manufacturing costs and therefore cost less.

Despite these benefits, e-books bring several drawbacks. For a start, reading from an e-book might affect people’s visual health. That is to say that staring at the screen may place more strain on eyes than reading printed books as readers blink less while using smartphones, laptops or other devices to read digital books. A growing number of researches reveals that reading digital books not only contribute to poor eyesight but also is prone to headaches. In addition to these, e-books are not just the real thing. This means that it is not a paperback fiction book that readers can smell the tantalizing aroma of new books or put a bookmark in between pages. To cap it all, people do not take pride in having a mini library at home.

In conclusion, the increasing trend towards reading e-books confers both advantages and disadvantages. The serious drawback to this phenomenon is that it damages visual health while saving many trees which are vital for our environment.

Sample 8:

A predominant part of educational institutes has changed their teaching mechanism now a day by migrating books and hard copies with electronic gadgets. Regardless of the eloquent presentation of the technology, printed materials play an inevitable role from the primitive era. Both areas are entwined with manifold benefits and drawbacks. I will speculate these with elaboration.

At present, people all over the world are manipulating technology in a plethora of areas. In education, the use of these electronics has developed with the time being. It provides better opportunities for the pupils to do something extra-ordinary in the future. As we cannot think of present days, without mobile phones, tablets, computers, etc. If the technology is introduced in the school, the student will be familiar with it at an early age. For instance, many wise children now days are getting involved in ascertain sectors like NASA, Google, Facebook, Microsoft by acquiring the best education as well as by getting the opportunity to meet up with all scopes.

Though technology has made our life quite easy, it deals with some negative impacts in our life. From bygone days, students learn by books, hardcopies and so on. Likewise, they do a lot of homework, assignments, class writing, etc. which assists them to be active in their home as well. Furthermore, when a pupil reads the books, it gives him more satisfaction to deal with understanding the tasks. Even more apparently, many students print the soft copy for studying that is given to them in the institutes. It is undoubtedly known that devices such as tablets and laptops cause many ailments like eye problems, ear problems, etc.

To recapitulate, as we are more familiar with the books and printed materials to do our study, it is more favorable in sense of technology. Though the magnitude of technology is an inevitable part of our life now, we have to cope with that too.

Sample 9:

These days, more and more people read electronic books than traditional books. It is argued by some that this development is beneficial, others however, disagree with this statement. This essay will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this issue.

On the one hand, there are several benefits of reading e-books. Firstly, they allow users to save and read two or more publications at the same time without any disturbance. For instance, electronic reader devices store many readily available books and other documents in a small chip, which makes these gadgets portable and easy to use.

While paper books not only occupy much more space on bookshelves but also make it hard to study multiple books at the same time. Secondly, an e-book does not require raw material such as water, wood chips and so on which is used in the process of papermaking. Thus, it acts as an environmentally friendly commodity. As this shows, certain advantages can be driven by using these new tools of reading.

On the other hand, many people believe that these technological innovations are not reliable sources of reading as they require a continuous supply of electricity for recharging their batteries. This is particularly important when someone is on a long journey or outdoors. As a result, it becomes difficult to use them when there is no access to the power supply, which is not a problem in case of paper versions. Furthermore, many readers feel attachment with the aesthetic values of printed books such as their smell, weight, texture and appearance on shelf making e books less satisfying option for them.

In conclusion, the merits and demerits of this trend are numerous. However, after analyzing both sides, it is felt that electronic books usage is ballooning at a rapid rate. Hence, it is believed that in years to come, the world would see a rapid rise in their sells.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, there is a growing demand for e-books popular on various platforms including tablets, kindle and computers. While some people see this as a good step forward, others would argue about the many drawbacks of using a screen to read books. In this essay, I would analyze and discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this trend and draw a reasonable conclusion for the statement.

Firstly, on one hand, while most of the rise of e-books could be attributed to the smartphone and gadget revolution of the 2000s, most folks, prior to this, used to read printed copies of their favourite novels and fiction books. In the past few centuries, reading was seen as a favourite pastime and prominent authors were viewed as an elite class who could move readers with their thoughts and imaginations by writing powerful ideas. For example, futuristic dystopian books like 2001: A Space Odyssey, Planet of the Apes or Time Machine were by authors who were hostile to the advent of technology, and it was perceived as a scary prospect among the public of those ages. Moreover, using paperback editions of the novels would have an environmental impact by requiring more trees to be cut for their manufacturing.

Conversely, on the other hand, using digital editions provides a hassle-free approach to reading. In other words, environmentally speaking, there are no or fewer trees required since most of the gadgets require microchips and semiconductors for their manufacturing. However, there have been threats in cyber-security due to numerous books which are published online and easily accessible to the community free of charge. In other words, for instance, the books are downloaded by prospective readers without paying the cost.

In conclusion, although there have been numerous drawbacks associated with a lack of charge or a display getting damaged, the advantages of owning an e-book outweigh the disadvantages. Moreover, reading printed editions would become an obsolete trend and there would be more digital copies of the same book available to readers.

Sample 1:

It is true that school children are at an impressionable age, and two strong influences on their intelligence and social development are teachers and parents. While I accept that teachers may have more influence on the intelligence of their pupils, I would argue that parents probably exert a greater influence on the social development of their children.

In terms of encouraging intellectual development and stimulating the intelligence of school children, I believe that teachers play the major role. While not all teachers are capable of inspiring their students, they are trained to impart their knowledge of their subject areas in challenging and imaginative ways. For example, some students owe their lifelong love of a subject to dedicated teachers who taught this discipline in secondary school. Of course, at home, parents may also reinforce this passion by encouraging good study habits during the formative years of their children. Such support is vital for academic achievement.

From the perspective of social development, I think that parents are mainly responsible for guiding their children. Firstly, they spend far more time with their children than any individual teacher is able to do. They can therefore monitor the activities of children outside school hours, at weekends and during holidays. Secondly, parents are able to provide role models in a whole range of situations. These might include showing respect towards elders, choice of friends, or proper behaviour in public when eating out in restaurants.

In conclusion, although teachers probably have a greater effect in stimulating the intelligence of school children, parental influences on the development of children are stronger in social situations.

Sample 2:

There is too much debate about whether teachers or parents influence children’s development socially and mentally. While I agree with the idea that teachers play an indispensable role in child development, I believe that parents have a greater impact on children growing up too.

On one hand, teachers are the backbone of the education system. By this I mean that, in most countries children begin to attend school from 5 years old and from this point they emerge from the small family and join the whole society and being part of it, with the presence of professional teacher this could be a huge development in term of social skills such as teamwork and sharing activities. Moreover, through different classes in mathematics and science, for instance, children can learn how to solve a complex problem in a short time, and this is the most important thing for brain development and intelligence. For illustration, it has been calculated that nearly 30% of the whole brain development takes place at this stage of our life.

On the other hand, parents and particularly mothers, as the child stays most of their time with them, play an important constituent in the growth of the child mentality. As a matter of fact, the preschool stage is a crucial stage, and children obtain and store vast amounts of information. Hence, in this period children create their own environment and personality. For instance, children copy their parents in their language and how they interact with each other. Moreover, families can boost their children inelegant and cognitive skills through video games, play, interactive discussion, advice etc. As a result, the crucial role of family is not forgettable.

To conclude, as we have seen. There is no easy answer to this question. However, I tend to believe that both parents and teachers influence children’s social skills and mental development.

Sample 3:

It is a fact that excellent, knowledgeable and experienced teachers will help students to do well in academic learning. However, their parents also have important roles in teaching them. I personally disagree that parents have less influence on their children's intelligence and social development than teachers and the essay will discuss my view.

To begin with, parents are their children's primary care givers and will spend many times with their children; therefore, children will have more chances to learn from them automatically. During school time, children go to school to obtain knowledge by learning different kinds of subjects; however, what they learn are all from textbooks or labs and after school, parents are their mentors in their daily lives and teach their children a variety of thinking skills. For example, children with good parents' support and guidance will do better at schools and have good careers in their future. Moreover, high intelligence is inherited by genes from parents.

In addition, children’s social development includes many contents, such as interpersonal skills, communication skills, and so on. It is definite that teachers will help their students to practice their communication skills via a variety of activities in classes; however, it takes a long time for children to master social skills. Children have been learning these skills since they were born. Their parents are their first teachers. For instance, researches indicate that children whose parents talked to them more in infant time will have better communication skills. These children tend to have a better capacity of expressing themselves.

In conclusion, at school teachers convey many knowledges and all kinds of skills to their students; however, parents pass more knowledges to their children during their lives and teach their children to master social skills. Parents play a more important role in influencing their children to become smarter and more competent than teachers.

Sample 4:

Sometimes a question is being raised that for the overall development of pupils of the school, they generally are better influenced by their educators rather than their parents especially when it comes to their intelligence and developing social skills. Although teachers can be proved beneficial to some extent in this context, the role of parents is far higher in inculcating such skills.

The main reason why parents are better is because they know their toddler very well. To explain, parents from the early days of an offspring used to educate their children about different types of subjects, which further assist them during their schooling days. What's more, they take them to social gatherings and thereby teach them how to behave and respect elders. Since teachers cannot inculcate this in a practical way, they can only improve an adolescent mental level by assisting them in understanding the concepts of their particular subject. Teaching other skills, for instance, requires a great deal of time and effort which a teacher is unable to give because they are also liable to cover their curriculum before exams. Family members, especially parents, are therefore more influencing their juvenile in such skills than that of educators.

Generally, every minor is different and so does their ability to soak instruction given by their teachers. Enhancing mental and social skills is a lifelong process and therefore it would be rather difficult for teachers to teach each and every student presenting in the class. Due to the fact that some can be even reluctant to gain such knowledge, they would create difficulties in creating such an environment for the whole class. Parents, on the other hand, especially fathers are generally strict in nature and know the importance of improving the social and mental development of their juvenile and teach them important life lessons from time to time. Teachers, in stark contrast, cannot be so strict as parents can be so the teenager can better acknowledge what their parents say and therefore parents are better teachers when it comes to mushrooming intelligence and social skills.

In conclusion, even though teachers are providing assistance in constructing their pupil's growth in terms of spreading education, a prominent role is being played by the parents for their infant's mental and social development. As they know their toddler better and thus can guide them accordingly.

Sample 5:

In the social and mental development of school-going children, their teachers and parents have serious impacts. It is highly disputed of whose influence is more on their intellectual level. It is thought by some people that teachers contribute much more to the child's development than his family. In my opinion, although teachers' positions and instruments are crucial, it cannot outrace the parents' role in terms of the intellectual advancement of their children.

In the modern era, school-goings have been spending more than a half of their day in the educational institutes. This results in the interaction between the teacher and the child to be more often and maybe deeper than the child's immediate circle. Moreover, the teaching settings are designed to improve the students' intelligence through educating them, especially in the fields of mathematics and science. Also, play groups are created in kindergartens in order for the young ones to socialize by playing with each other. This beneficial education is done by a professional teaching team. Thereby, teachers play a vital part in the children’s lives. For example, a survey conducted suggests that more than 40 percent of the young-aged men and women has indicated that they learnt most of the knowledge of life from their school teachers as their household have to go to work daily and came home tired.

On the other hand, the parents have an undeniable influence on their offspring's intelligence. Before enrolling in a school, children are always next to their family who show them the distinction of the right and wrong and play games for hours. All these actions are carried out specifically for the children's improvement.

In conclusion, the children are influenced by their school teachers as well as home teachers which are their parents in honing their certain skills. Despite teachers having advantageous effects on improving the youth socially and intellectually, it is an indisputable fact that parents play a more crucial role in bringing up their loved-ones and developing their important social and mind related skills.

Sample 6:

Teachers and parents both play a huge role in a student's success. It is argued that, although it is parents who nurture their children, a tutor has a greater impact on developing their intelligence and social behaviour. This essay agrees that it is the educator that has a superior role than parents both in academics and morals.

Firstly, it is the teacher's task to foster learning. They provide more comprehensive learning and make the student brighter in terms of academic performance. For instance, even though parents have all the information and knowledge regarding the subject, not all of them are equipped with the skills to teach them. Therefore, it is the mentor who can make it easier to comprehend and provide a strong foundation. A good teacher can inspire hope, ignite the imagination and instill a love of learning.

Secondly, teaching not only includes theoretical knowledge but also morals and behaviour. These principles guide a person throughout life and make them better humans. For example, in kindergarten, the little ones are taught to share toys and to greet elders. These are the small steps taken towards becoming a good-hearted adult. Hence, it is commonly said that the influence of a good schoolteacher can never be erased.

In conclusion, it is debatable if it's the mother and father or the teacher who has a bigger effect on school children's intelligence and social upbringing. In the light of the above factors, I firmly believe that the teacher has a larger impact on the child.

Sample 7:

It is a controversial issue as to whether teachers affect children's social development and high IQ, or, whether parents are responsible for youngsters' improvement in gathering knowledge and social advancement. From my perspective, I, holistically, believe that parents are involved in both of these developments instead of preceptors.

To begin with, children spend most of their early life in the care of parents. This is because most of the adolescents start their schooling from the age of four to seven so that this year is crucial for juveniles to develop their mental ability and to interact with society. For example, studies have shown that 90% of children's upbringing is dependent on their guardians who prefer to raise themselves with proper attention and care. Hence, whatever a child learns at an early age, its credit goes to the progenitor, because when he opens his eyes at first, he sees his parent first, not teachers.

Another argument is that children develop their skills in the range of socioeconomic culture. The factors of socioeconomic are hobbies, society and food habits of youngsters who get from their family. However, it is an integral part of the topic of where children belong to. The reason is that the more polished and educated the family would be, the more knowledgeable and friendly the attitude of that child would possess. The first influence of the factor is that parents, for instance, select better teachers and schools for gaining a comprehensive idea of how-to live-in community and gathering wisdom. Thus, for giving children a better position in society, nutrients in food items, and attitude towards hobby-related activities, guardians are, astronomically, responsible.

In conclusion, to be knowledgeable and societal relies on parents in lieu of teachers, so far as I am concerned. On the contrary, advocates believe that the school teachers are largely impacting on children's higher wisdom and the advancement in the community rather than parents.

Sample 8:

It is argued that teachers in preschools and primary schools exert more effect on intelligence and social skills of children than parents. While I agree with the viewpoint, I believe that parents probably have a great impact on the development of their offspring.

There are a number of reasons why teachers are able to encourage their students to develop intelligence and social skills. The most obvious evidence is that children go to school in order to learn subjects regarding society or logic, including math or literature. Therefore, teachers who are trained professionals can tailor teaching styles suitable for their students with the aim of supporting them in having a good grasp of their subjects. Furthermore, social development is likely to be enhanced through mixing with other students, so teachers can aid their students in creating interaction between the students. For example, by making several teams in a class to do a task, the students are capable of developing teamwork skills.

I consider that parents still play a vital role in social development and intelligent improvement of children. First, parents can provide extracurricular activities for their children by enrolling them in extra classes. For instance, parents are able to bring their offspring to English classes beyond schools; as a result, the children are likely to develop communication skills and improve English, by virtue of approaching native speakers and other friends at the classes. Second, the intelligence of children can be developed via nutrients. Consequently, parents may provide their children vitamins, which exert positive impacts on children's brain, by spending an amount of money on buying milk and nutritious foods.

In conclusion, although I agree that teachers are better than parents in developing intelligence and social skills. I think that parents still play a great role in doing that via several methods.

Sample 9:

It is argued by some people that the intelligence and the social development of children in school is mainly influenced by their teachers. I disagree with this notion, as social skills and intellect of young ones begin to develop before they commence elementary school and parents spend more time with their children to influence their development.

First of all, intelligence and social skills of young ones begin to develop from infancy. Children neurological abilities determine their intellects and social developments which can be affected by their nutrition and care parents give to them at the early age. For instance, infants who are well nourished with adequate parental bonding are expected to be intelligent and have skills needed for social interactions, although, they need some inputs from their teachers as well. Therefore, if parents do not provide the necessary care for their kids, school teachers would not be able to instruct them.

Furthermore, children spend more time with their parents than the teachers and they can be easily influenced by them. Children's interactions with their parents begin right after birth and even when children start schooling, they spend a smaller proportion of their time with teachers. For example, in Nigeria, primary school pupils spend an average of seven hours daily at school, while they stay with their parents for more than half of the day. Thus, parents have more opportunities to impact the intelligence and social development of their offsprings compared to their teachers.

In conclusion, I disagree with the view that teachers have more influence on school children's intelligence and social development than their parents. This is due to the fact that children's intellect and social interactions start before commencing school and they spend a considerable proportion of time daily with their parents.

Sample 10:

Even though various kinds of disciplinary methods are used to correct students’ deleterious behaviour in schools, the most criticized one could be corporal punishment. Supporters of this argue that by using these children, can be easily corrected than any other, whereas others think that, due to this, children may suffer a lot both physically and mentally. In my opinion, I consider students should not be punished in this manner.

On the one hand, supporters of physical punishment point out that problematic students often stop disturbing other students in the class and maintain appropriate and acceptable behaviour. Similarly, they understand unacceptable behaviour can be punishable and this should not be continued. Take cheating in exam as an example, when a learner is corrected by this method not only assist him to change his own character, but others in the class also learn from this. By doing this, therefore, maintain a peaceful and conducive atmosphere in schools.

On the other hand, those who are against the above argument considering that, when a child corrected by using physical abuse, this not only cause physical trauma, but emotional disturbance as well. I, strongly support this viewpoint. This may have long term repercussions, that may impact on their later life negatively. A recent study, for instance, reported that the majority of the criminals who had received corporal punishment, when they were growing up. This created a rebellious attitude towards others and turn, then, against the legal system and became criminals in their adulthood.

By way of conclusion, disciplinary actions often, including, abusing children by physically, according to some; however, there remains some disagreements. I, again, reaffirm that young generations must be treated with mutual respect and dignity, rather than correct them either smacking or beating.

Sample 1:

It is a view held by certain people that being affluent and possessing material wealth offer individuals to be generous and provide assistance to people around them. Others, however, remark that prosperity does not imply that one will bear the responsibility of others by helping them out. In my opinion, affluence undoubtedly creates an opportunity for a person to support those around them and uplift them and I will illustrate why I think so in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, we have to understand that well-heeled people have accumulated their riches from other people, whether through an employee, an entrepreneur or through inheritance of generational wealth. In such a case, their wealth provides them with the freedom to give back to society and help individuals whose goodwill and support they have profited from. Secondly, if rich people used the freedom afforded to them to start helping other people around, it would slowly begin to decrease the global wealth gap.

Furthermore, the chance to be altruistic and selflessly help others is undoubtedly one of the most important opportunities due to wealth. Philanthropy is notable for making both the recipient and donor feel a positive, warm glow but, more significantly, allows the donor to explore avenues of personal growth and self-improvement through the act of helping. Lastly, one of the major ways wealthy people can use their platform is by creating jobs and providing funding for education and research, contributing to society positively and changing many lives in the process.

However, many wealthy people misuse the freedom afforded to them. Under the pretence of donating, some wealthy people engage in tax evasion. Others help out in the hope of polishing their public image or ascending greater heights of fame. Thus, it can be seen that many people act out of self-interest when it comes to using their wealth to provide comfort to other people.

Thus, to conclude, being wealthy does provide people with a chance to help out those around them, but ultimately it is their motivation for doing so that really creates a difference in their lives and that of others.

Sample 2:

In contemporary society, financial circumstances hold considerable significance, sparking numerous discussions about the responsibilities of the wealthy. Some individuals believe that one of the most critical aspects of wealth is aiding others, and I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment.

Firstly, possessing financial means enables individuals to extend assistance to others in various ways. Specifically, those with substantial wealth can contribute to charitable causes, such as supporting underprivileged children or individuals in remote areas lacking stable income. This, in turn, alleviates the government’s burden of aiding impoverished individuals, indirectly reallocating national funds to address other pressing social issues. Consequently, affluent individuals can actively contribute to the development of their country, fostering feelings of fulfillment and pride.

Moreover, the pervasive influence of wealth in contemporary society facilitates philanthropic efforts. For instance, affluent individuals can sponsor talent competitions or vocational training programs to nurture skilled and versatile individuals, thereby enhancing the country’s artistic and professional milieu in the long run. A tangible example of this lies in the case of Nguyen Tien Minh, who received financial support for his training from a successful figure in the sports industry, subsequently emerging as the most accomplished badminton player in Vietnam’s history on the international stage.

In conclusion, I assert that enhancing the lives of others is the most crucial contribution that affluent individuals can make in both the short and long term.

Sample 3:

There have never been more prosperous people on the earth than it is today. There is a common thought that the critical thing about being well-off is the opportunity to help others. In this essay, I will give you my opinion on this matter and why I agree with this thought.

Most people want to help others in need, and everyone can do it to a certain degree. Furthermore, a recent survey from the UK shows that the British population donates around 2% of their earnings to charity organizations. However, if we had more money and resources, we could have a greater impact. Therefore, being rich opens this possibility, as well as it doesn’t affect our living conditions in the same way, allowing us to not suffer from helping others. For example, Bill Gates is one of the richest people in the world, and his contributions to charity alone are more than a number of countries donations combined.

Everyone has experienced the hopeless feeling of not being able to support close family or friends with their economic situation, for instance due to the fact of high student loans or medical conditions. However, if we had more money, we would have the opportunity to help them and give them a better life. Although, this is not always the case for everyone. Some rich people use their money on materialistic goods and only on themselves.

In conclusion, I believe that the most vital thing about being rich is that it gives the opportunity to support friends, family and others in need, however I believe some people have more egoistic priorities and intentions with their wealth.

Sample 4:

There is a popular belief that the primary significance of wealth lies in its capacity to allow individuals to assist others. While it is true that having substantial financial resources can offer the affluent an opportunity to extend a helping hand to those in need, I hold the perspective that such a responsibility does not inherently accompany wealth.

On one hand, accumulating wealth can empower individuals to alleviate the struggles of the less fortunate. This is due to the fact that affluent individuals often have fewer financial concerns, making them more inclined to provide support to others. A pertinent illustration of this phenomenon is evident in the numerous charitable organizations, where the founders or benefactors are frequently millionaires or even billionaires, generously contributing a significant portion of their wealth to aid those requiring assistance.

Despite the undeniable positive social outcomes associated with philanthropy, being affluent encompasses more than altruistic acts. Attaining a privileged position in society usually entails surmounting numerous challenges and exerting considerable effort to amass wealth. Consequently, upon achieving affluence, it is reasonable for individuals to seek enjoyment and relaxation to compensate for the arduous journey to prosperity. For instance, affluent individuals engage in various activities such as global travel, fine dining experiences, and the acquisition of luxury items like jewelry and properties. These endeavors enable individuals to derive satisfaction from their accomplishments and validate the fruits of their labor.

In conclusion, I contend that the foremost advantage of being wealthy lies in the opportunity it affords individuals to savor an enriched quality of life. While extending aid to others yields social benefits, such acts of benevolence should be regarded as discretionary rather than obligatory.

Sample 5:

Some people hold the view that the most significant aspect of being wealthy is having the chance to help other people. I completely agree with this as rich people can engage in charity work and create employment opportunities for local communities.

To begin with, I believe wealthy individuals have the unique ability to assist less fortunate members of society, with philanthropy and charity projects. This means that people in need, such as underprivileged children, can have a chance at higher education with the funding of new schools and academies by successful CEOs, who have made billions from their businesses. For instance, Warren Buffet, a famous Wall Street trader and billionaire donated a large proportion of his wealth to philanthropic causes over the past decade, particularly in the education sector. This has helped countless youngsters from low- income families that could not afford a decent education.

Another important point to consider is that rich people can create many opportunities at a local business level bringing new jobs to the local community. With investment from millionaires and top executives, many local shops and factories can be opened up, resulting in towns that have low employment being transformed economically. To illustrate this, Luton in the UK benefitted greatly from investment from Alan Sugar, a popular technology CEO, who opened a production line for Amstrad computers in the late 1990s. This resulted in many new jobs which also attracted further investment from other tech giants such as Apple and IBM.

To sum up, I firmly believe that the wealthy can assist others through charities and investment in communities, thus greatly benefiting poorer members of society.

Sample 6:

Despite the burgeoning number of individuals below the poverty line around the world, there are elite groups of people in every nation who lead lavish lives. Many masses believe that the most significant factor about being well-off is that it allows one to assist the destitute. This essay is in accordance with the above-given view and will provide supporting ideas in the upcoming stanzas.

To begin with, there are many affluent personalities who believe in benevolence and giving back to society. All their basic as well as desires are satisfied, and they live their life to the fullest. Hence to experience more joy, satisfaction and get the blessings of the impoverished they extend their support to them in many ways. There are numerous people in the wealthiest tier of society who are not just sitting on piles of money. Donations and aid are offered by such people in the form of charity as they run several NGOs, old age homes and orphanages. Many wealthy personalities invest in building some facilities for the betterment of society like schools, colleges, hospitals, libraries and many more.

To continue, such philanthropic donors develop a feeling of eternal respect and reverence for themselves in the hearts of millions. They understand that the real essence of humanity lies in kindness and being helpful to the poverty-stricken. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook whose net worth is $17.5 billion donated $100 million in 2010. He made this gigantic donation to his own foundation, which tends to support the school system in Newark, New Jersey.

To encapsulate, there are several privileged folks who have conscience and believe that one is not rich until he/she is kind, humane and supportive to the seeking.

Sample 7:

It is believed that one of the advantages for the rich is that they have a chance to donate to others or support the poor in real life. There are many good and bad views on this issue before presenting my opinion that it makes the rich community help the world by having many abilities to do that.

There are many advantages of being rich. One of the obvious things is that they can make the foundation for the particular weaker population by supporting them financially. Similarly, a lot of hopeless and poor children are outside the world, so they need a hand for them to get supported. Therefore, their lives will be better if they have a talent for work and can live in a supportive environment. For example, if talented but not affordable poor students do not have a chance to attend school, their future will be dull and aimless. Because of foundation or financial backing from the rich family, they might have a good standard of living by having education and knowledge.

On the other hand, popular entrepreneurs can provide a job opportunity for the low-class communities for their earnings. Only the big boss has the ability to do that. If the poor can earn money, they can live in high quality of living standard like the others. However, some argue that only the businessmen who have the charity mindset are willing to support the others. Otherwise, it is also difficult for them to spend their money on other situations. In contrast, some societies who are not rich people but can support money as much as they can to the poor society. Therefore, it is not always true that rich men can provide financial assistance and the affordable middle-class public tend to utilize their budget wisely on others who really need that kind of support. But I think only the high authorized and tycoons can make more changes for the poor than the individual backing to them.

In conclusion, many famous tradesmen have the power to give a hand to other needed public by donating money to charities and foundations. I also totally agree that only that kind of wealthy citizen can change the lives of the low-class public by supporting them.

Sample 8:

According to a set of individuals, the indispensable aspect of having wealth is that they can lend a hand to the individuals who require help in any situation. I support the given view. The following paragraphs would include the reasons for my inclination.

To begin with, the population who are devoided of wealth cannot even look after themselves and have to do a lot of hard work to even eat once a day. As a result, even if they want to stand by others when others need some kind of financial help, they cannot afford it. These type of situations decrease their self-confidence. For instance, even if they want to help a beggar, they cannot do that because of their financial status.

Alternatively, people having an enormous amount of money can do a lot of things. Importantly, they can help other individuals in terms of money. This means that if they have a lending heart, they can pay for others in many ways without looking back. For example, wealthy persons can provide shelter to the people in the slum areas by building at least a room for each of them. As a consequence, that these poor people can shift from huts to houses. In such a way they get a chance of proving their humanity.

To conclude, being rich is truly beneficial for persons with golden hearts who never step back to help someone. Hence, I am more inclined towards the given statement.

Sample 9:

For decades, helping low-income segments of society have become appreciated. wealth has been cultivated a habit of helping population in-need population. While, in recent years, it is often said that the most essential thing about being rich is that gives them the chance of assistance., I am firmly convinced that is a crucial part of being rich; However, I believe that there are other much relevant aspects.

Without any doubt, the assistance of rich people has become noticeable financially as well as emotionally. First and foremost, such people tend to attract the attention of the mass media, who use the media in presenting their help to charities, for instance. The cogent reason provided to support this claim is that most of this financial support is transported via different kinds of channels, which increases their popularity significantly.

Furthermore, encouraging others emotionally, physically, and financially will have an effect on others' feelings, according to a variety of researches have been pointed out that. Take, for example, Mohammed Ali when he provided one million as financial support. As a result, the wealthy population needs to integrate with others in order to make deprived people have some sense of dignity.

In conclusion, it is evident that there are multiple factors that are responsible for driving the rich to assist needy people, while there are others crucial. Therefore, I firmly believe that it is a vital contribution to serve low-income layers of society regardless of the motives of the rich people. Despite that, the government should encourage them to provide assistance.

Sample 10:

A number of individuals opine that the chances of raising hands for doing good of others are the most significant achievement for a wealthy human. Although I agree with the statement, I believe some other personal aspects have equal weights.

Resource promotes a person to aid. When a person becomes rich in terms of money and assets, he actually has enough arrangement required to fulfil demands of self and others, because most of the tasks in the world are needed finance to facilitate. Therefore, a rich individual can easily support deprived or helpless people if they are kind, and thus become mentally satisfied. For example, Bill Gates, who is one of the richest business magnets of this world, is renowned for being a philanthropist, and that becomes possible not only for his kindness but also to have that budget to patronize such welfare work.

Nevertheless, another prime importance of being rich is to lead an enjoyable life. Because resourceful humans can avail lots of amenities in exchange for money, which make their life pleasurable and serve them the opportunities to survive cheerfully compared to others. For instance, an affluent person can purchase or hire luxuries accommodation, enrol in the best educational institution or travel exclusively. Besides, they can get respect from the general people by using their assets for creating employment or the development of the community. To illustrate, many affluents built organizations, and through these institutes, they are providing jobs and doing corporate social responsibilities.

In conclusion, according to some humans, the prime advantage of being rich is having the scope of doing better for the community. However, I think some other factors have the same importance for resourceful people.

Sample 1:

In our world, many individuals commit themselves to extensive education and skill development, all in pursuit of securing a rewarding career. The general consensus among people is that a gratifying profession is the most vital factor in making each individual’s life meaningful. I completely disagree with this statement as, in addition to work, relationships and personal experiences are two distinct elements that contribute significantly to discovering meaning in life.

In the contemporary world, relationships are essential for people’s fulfillment in life. Whether it’s the support of friends or the bond with family, these strong connections create a person’s sense of existence, which importantly generates motivation to strive mightily in both occupation and meaningful leisure activities such as volunteering, exploring new horizons, and supporting others. Moreover, a balanced combination of work and leisure not only enriches life but also provides marvelous opportunities to foster the journey of self-exploration, allowing individuals to uncover their true personality, strengths, weaknesses, and potential. These internal factors are keys to encountering difficulties, leading to achievements.

Furthermore, the accumulation of real-life experiences plays an essential role in building a positive attitude towards life. Traveling to novel destinations or engaging in new activities are effective methods for breaking free from the comfort zone, leading to the relinquishment of negative feelings. This can prevent people, especially workaholics, from common psychological problems such as sleep deprivation, depression, and anxiety disorders, which can foster decisions to suicide. Creating memorable experiences for oneself can instill a sense of purpose and satisfaction, empowering individuals to conquer their fears and pursue their passions.

In summary, I am of the opinion that the meaning of life is derived not just from engaging in a fulfilling occupation but also from nurturing profound relationships and cherishing personal experiences.

Sample 2:

While it is argued that a distinguished career is regarded as the most pivotal thing in a person’s life, I firmly believe that there are other factors which can make people’s lives meaningful.

On the one hand, it cannot be denied that working plays a vital role in one’s life. According to an annual survey carried out in the UK, a person spends about 25 or 30 years in their occupation, hence working time accounts for nearly one-third of a person’s life. So, if people obtain a worthwhile job that blooms, their lifetime is likely to be filled with human well-being. Additionally, the state of being stuck in an unsuccessful career might have a destructive influence on people’s spirits. Those with turbulent career or experience of job dissatisfaction could suffer from chronic stress and discouragement, which affects their mental and physical health adversely, as well as making them have a negative outlook on their lives.

On the other hand, I contend that there are more desirable goals than a successful career to attain in our life. A vast majority of people perceive a meaningful life as helping others living in poor and underprivileged conditions. They spend most of their lifetime devoting to charity work. Furthermore, there are other people who do not enter the workforce but seem satisfied with their lives. In some Asian countries such as Japan, dual-income families are not as common as that in Western nations. Take Japan as a telling example; men are often the breadwinners while women stay at home, take over the responsibilities related to household chores and childcare, which make them feel content as a well-established tradition.

In conclusion, while undoubtedly people can benefit enormously from a glittering career, there are still a lot of significant factors which might enable them to lead a happy life.

Sample 3:

Many people believe that work plays an indispensable role in a person’s life. While it is argued that work engagement can generate many values for many, I would contend that it is not the only enjoyable pursuit for human existence.

On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that having satisfying jobs has brought about varied benefits and meanings to people. Firstly, they can have the opportunity to polish the professional expertise. Also, they can apply and even improve such acquired knowledge and practical skills as computing or negotiation through different tasks at the workplace. Secondly, a fulfilling job may provide people with a sense of financial stability and security. Without any doubt, high and stable wages and salaries have financially supported people to pay for food, accommodating, other living expenses as well as facilitating different aspects of their lives. Finally, personal relationships and the atmosphere in the workplace are extremely important for people’s well-being. Having a good manager or friendly colleagues, for example, can make a huge difference in workers’ levels of happiness and general quality of life.

On the other hand, it should be argued that working is not always lucrative and ideal choices for some people, depending upon their conditions and traits. Concerning a meaningful life, for many people, family even matters more than their careers. Without unconditional love and support from beloveds, people can hardly overcome numerous stresses from life and work. It is argued that respect from colleagues can be a substitution for family’s love; however, it is uncertain whether they will support us when we no longer have power. Meanwhile, family members are those who always love and protect us under any circumstances. Further, for those whose financial condition is already secured, they may prefer devoting their time to other values to working. It seems to be prevailing that the affluent tend to leave their jobs, traveling, and doing whatever they are passionate about. For them, life is appealing enough to merit further exploration.
In conclusion, while it is true that having job fulfillment is beneficial to many people, it is not necessarily an enjoyable pursuit for others. Thus, solely job satisfaction is not enough for a meaningful life.

Sample 4:

It is often said that the most significant factor in human life is occupation. It is a common belief that habitually claims, without a job that satisfies human beings, people cannot find a specific meaning for their lives. From my point of view, I completely agree with the idea that work is necessary.

Firstly, one of the main reasons for this argument is the powerful impact of jobs on people's lifestyles. For example, in most developed countries all around the world where the population can find suitable opportunities to find an occupation, it is obvious that people feel regularly self-confidence and they announce that they are satisfied. It means appropriate work is the key to happiness and other feelings that humans have such as positive emotions as a result of working in a luxury hotel. Therefore, it makes it clear why the most indispensable component in our lives is careers.

Secondly, another reason is the positive transformations that are related to having an occupation. For instance, we all know the population who have their own works are habitually well-being as well as having a specific programme to perform their responsibilities. Additionally, there is no denying that when humans decide to follow some roles that have multiple advantages, becoming successful will be fulfilled. All these things pertain to having a suitable job that we are interested in. As a result, it becomes apparent there are numerous reasons behind each claim that we cannot ignore.

All things considered, I strongly agree with that idea. I also believe that communities should consider it as a crucial element. It is predicted that to continue reflecting on this essential item we will have a better world to live in, in the near future.

Sample 5:

It is believed that career achievements play a pivotal role in culminating the meaning of life. From my perspective, this opinion is completely unconvincing, because a person’s life is only fulfilling when there is a combination of fortune, family and well-being. The following paragraphs would shed light on my viewpoint.

Admittedly, advocates of this standpoint have their rational grounds. First, success in careers leads to a variety of economic benefits for job-seekers. In particular, stable jobs offer workers monthly earnings, which would increase as workers perform well and climb the career ladder. Even, enterprises provide treatments for employees’ families such as insurance or trips yearly. Second, successful businessmen were respected by society. Irrefragably, numerous individuals usually hope that they would successfully achieve their goals and already succeed as their role models. In reality, individuals are willing to pay large sums to listen to experiences from the CEO of Vietnamese ubiquitous groups.

Despite the aforementioned merits, I still believe that a meaningful life needs more elements than money and fame. First, employees should have excellent well-being to enjoy their achievements. To be specific, several staff exchange their health to work in polluted workplaces which cause many respiratory diseases. Consequently, their savings are just enough for paying the hospital's fees. In addition, family and social relationships are of paramount importance to any worker. Especially, working environments are especially one of the reasons for stress while the family is always empathetic and helps job seekers to relax. Moreover, friends' meetings are also a feature which endows living standards.

In conclusion, it is indisputable that succeeding in professions is the target of various individuals. Nonetheless, I still believe that a meaningful life is contributed by poverty, family and health.

Sample 6:

It is often argued by many people that working is an important thing in their life. While others believe that life is useless without a successful career, I completely disagree with this statement since prioritizing work would lead to severe health issues.

There are two major points why dedicating life as a worker does not play a significant role in the happiness of one's life. Firstly, when we are working for companies, it means that we have to be able to obey the rules and meet the company's work ethic and standards. In other words, if we do not finish the workload, taking longer hours is unbearably becoming an agreement or even worse being fired which leads to a high level of stress. Secondly, working for a factory means that you sacrifice your weekdays for work life and only have two days of the weekend for leisure time which sometimes is taken by your family for get-togethers. Consequently, you have little time for yourself to spend on activities you like.

Another prominent reason is the fact that there are many detrimental effects, especially on health due to prioritizing work over any else in life. Sedentary life, for example, is reported by the Indonesia Ministry of Health as the key factor contributing to severe health issues among workers because workers lack physical activity, thus generating heat stroke. In addition, balancing work and life is seemingly a great way to overcome health problems. Therefore, managing a healthy lifestyle by doing physical activities and not considering work as a top priority in life is a better way of life.

In conclusion, if people pay too much attention to their careers, it would increase their stress level and lead to several health problems. Hence, balancing work and personal life is undeniably shaping a healthy and worthy life.

Sample 7:

It is undeniable that work is one of the most essential parts of a human being’s life. Therefore, many people believe that their life will become nothing if they do not succeed in their careers. I partly disagree with this idea since there are several other factors that are crucial for humanity.

On the one hand, admittedly, work is very pivotal to everyone. Firstly, by working, people can enhance many fundamental skills and improve their knowledge in their field. That is to say, this will make people either emerge their full potential or discover new breakthroughs in certain subjects which they have already mastered. Secondly, they can earn money to support not only their own livelihood but also their families. Ultimately, albeit some people, especially scientists or the affluent ones, are not money-oriented, they still work passionately and diligently towards their goals to show their abilities and earn respect from other people simply just to desire to find something new for the human race. Najwa Shihab, a well-known Indonesian journalist, for example, has thought that she works just for war against justice in Indonesia's political world regardless of the wages she got.

On the other hand, from my perspective, health also is a thing that should not be neglected. Obviously, we cannot work well with poor health. Thus, the performance of a person who gets a fatal disease will be affected a lot. Moreover, if most people just focus on work, one day they will get seriously sick, which might lead to a burden for their families. In 2016, research results released by the Indonesian Epidemic Journal Center showed that there is a significant number of workers suffering from various diseases reaching about 70%, and this number has been increasing year by year. Consequently, not only they will be affected but also others who take care of them.

In conclusion, although I admit that having a successful job is the top priority of each individual's goals, we should also be more careful about our health to make our life better.

Sample 8:

In this world, having a job with better pay is vital for a living. Some people argue that without a successful profession, a person's career is not complete. I completely agree with this statement and the following essay states points and supports my opinion.

Firstly, we need money to run a family. If we have good work with a better payment, then we can lead the family without financial struggles. Additionally, performing well in the field leads to promotion with salary hikes. Hence, we can spend more of our budget on the family. This makes the individual's life successful. For example, in Kerala, there is a survey conducted by the authorities among older parents, revealing that they are happy with their children who earn more and are in good company in society.

Secondly, having a decent job in an area where the individual likes make them happier and satisfied. A task without satisfaction leads to stress and depression. Moreover, in such a situation, youngsters cannot find meaning in their life. They do a profession to get the salary to run the family and to get a position in society. For instance, most of the workers in the IT field are not facing motivation because of the lack of interest in the work and pressure from the management.

In conclusion, in my opinion, having a job with good pay and satisfaction makes an individual's life worth and relaxed. Without those things, youngsters feel ignored by their loved ones and depressed in their careers. Therefore, it is important that we consider work as the most viable option for success in life.

Sample 9:

Life always requires some form of discipline in order to succeed, this can be achieved by doing a job and having a proper career. Many people may or may not agree with this as some think otherwise. Whereas, I advocate that having a proper, stable work ethic is needed to shape a person for his livelihood.

To begin with, in the current 21st-century society has revolutionized itself to a considerable extent with which choosing a proper stable job has become a huge hassle. Humans themselves have no idea what to do as in which profession suits them the best so that they can achieve success. One such example is that major IT companies not only look for computer proficient students but also look for students from other fields, this creates a small confusion for people who search for a proper job position. If a person gets a proper well-paying business this can make their work-life stable.

Secondly, a proper well-paying profession can make you the breadwinner of the family which will help you raise your social status among the community. Typically, in a country like India, people expect more from every individual so a proper paying job can be the most optimal solution. An accurate example would be taking two scenarios where a YouTuber will mostly earn less than the one who works in a well working professional environment.

In conclusion, only a proper occupation will help you have a secure and stable business in growth we must always work in order to bring in excellence. The proper activity ethics provides a proper meaning to our growth. Therefore, working towards something which provides us with a jump start in our life to our tread further in the passage of life. My recommendation is that every human must always work with a purpose so as to achieve excellence.

Sample 10:

Some people think that work is the ultimate goal in every person’s life and to live a meaningful life, one has to excel in it. In my opinion, it is partially true because it provides us with money which is essential for our survival, but one can live a meaningful and happy life even without it.

On the one hand, work is a source of our salaries which allows us to pay for the things that we need or want. In other words, people are paid according to their success in their field, although some people simply work to make some positive impacts on society and the world as a whole. Unlike in the past, the cost of living in modern society is pretty expensive and thus, the majority of people don’t see their existence without a job. For example, people in America have to pay hefty taxes and fees for every service they take and without proper economic background, one is guaranteed to struggle. Therefore, people consider work as one of the most important things in their life.

However, on the other hand, one can ensure a prosperous future even without success in their career because life is not only about materialistic gains and becoming the best. Rather, it is about fulfilling your life purposes like being happy, contented, being thankful, and many others. In other words, one can work for the welfare of others by committing to work in charities and care homes because you will experience love, happiness, and peace despite being paid little money. In fact, the majority of rich people are unhappy even though they are living a successful life.

In conclusion, each and every person should work for their dream jobs and the money but at the same time, should not forget the significance of spiritual wellbeing because without it life is truly meaningless.

Sample 1:

While some people believe that zoos play an important role in protecting wild animals, others feel that keeping animals locked up in such places is cruel and unnecessary. Personally, I agree with the idea that animals should not be kept in zoos and that zoos should be shut down.

On the one hand, many people feel that zoos are useful in some regards. Firstly, zoos can help to preserve endangered animals by keeping them safe from poachers and other threats, such as habitat destruction and the spread of urbanisation. Some zoos also run breeding programs in order to try and increase the numbers of some endangered species to avoid them becoming extinct. Secondly, by keeping animals in zoos, people can learn and understand more about them, and this can help to raise awareness amongst the public in order to help preserve certain species.

However, while the abovementioned ideas may be true to a certain extent, I believe that zoos are unnecessary for the following reasons. To begin with, zoos can only hold small numbers of animals and therefore cannot protect the large majority of species from being hunted or their habitats from being destroyed. I believe it is the responsibility of each government to create and fund conservation programs that help to stop the destruction of the habitats of endangered species so that animals can live in their natural state rather than be locked up in cages for their entire life. Furthermore, in many zoos, animals are being mistreated as they are often provided with insufficient food and medical care, which has so far caused many animals in zoos to die because of starvation and diseases.

In conclusion, though some zoos may have some positive impacts on the conservation of some certain animal species, overall, I think they are cruel places and do more harm than good.

Sample 2:

There are many people who have protested the conditions of zoos and demand that they should be shut down, as animals are subject to appalling conditions inside artificial captivity, while others believe that the institution of zoos can be beneficial to the conservation of wild animals. In my view, zoos may be the last resort for many species as the practice of poaching continues to threaten their survival, and should therefore be maintained.

On the one hand, many animal activists do have a point in arguing that zoos can be cruel. They are often mockeries of the animals natural habitats, and far too small to accommodate the animals that inhabit them. A lot of the animals in zoos are not as in shape as they would be in the wild, since they have regular feeding hours and no longer have any need to hunt. This in turn leads to them becoming unhealthy and living shorter lives. Many captive gorillas, for example, have been observed to have a lower lifespan than their free-roaming counterparts.

On the other hand, zoos prevent poachers from killing more animals, for they provide security that would not exist in the wild. Poaching has been a huge issue in recent years and has contributed to a number of species going extinct. Zoos, meanwhile, are controlled places where the animals are under observation and protected by security at all times. Many zoos are currently being used in Africa in order to protect endangered species of rhino, for example, and as they have been shown to save many species from the cusp of extinction, they are a necessary evil for wildlife to continue to exist.

On the whole, I argue that although there are certain moral problems to keeping animals in zoos, the alternative of them potentially getting poached means that the existence of zoos is morally justified.

Sample 3:

Numerous individuals have voiced concerns regarding the conditions within zoos, calling for their closure due to the inhumane treatment of animals in artificial enclosures. However, others argue that zoos play a crucial role in wildlife conservation. In my opinion, zoos serve as a last resort for many endangered species threatened by poaching and should, therefore, be maintained.

On the one hand, animal rights activists have valid reasons for claiming that zoos can be cruel. These facilities often provide inadequate representations of the animals' natural habitats and are typically too small to house them comfortably. Many zoo animals are not as healthy as their wild counterparts since they have scheduled feeding times and no need to hunt for food. As a result, they may become unhealthy and have shorter lifespans. For instance, research has shown that polar bears in captivity generally have shorter lifespans compared to their wild counterparts, as the diet provided to polar bears in captivity is often insufficiently varied and lacks the nutritional balance they would receive in the wild.

On the other hand, zoos offer protection against poachers by providing a secure environment that is unavailable in the wild. Poaching has become a significant issue in recent years, leading to the extinction of various species. Zoos are controlled environments where animals are constantly monitored and protected by security personnel. In Africa, for example, zoos have been used to safeguard endangered rhino species, successfully saving numerous species from the brink of extinction. Thus, zoos can be considered a necessary evil for the continued survival of wildlife.

In conclusion, while there are moral concerns surrounding the confinement of animals in zoos, the potential threat of poaching justifies their existence. In my opinion, they should be preserved and promoted as this is one of the only ways we can help species on the verge of extinction.

Sample 4:

Zoos’ contribution to our modern society has been a hotly debated topic. Many people are of the opinion that all zoos should be shut down due to their cruelty, while others think that zoos are the best places to shelter endangered animals. In this essay, these two views will be discussed in depth before giving my justification on why zoos are necessary for the protection of animals.

On the one hand, it is often argued that all zoos should be permanently banned for their heinousness. To be more specific, animals are kept in limited living space in cages, and they could not have the freedom like they do in their natural habitats. As a result, their instinct may be seriously affected as they could lose their hunting and survival ability. In addition, animals could face the risk of being mistreated by zookeepers. To elaborate, some wildlife parks would not feed the animals to seek profit from the tourists buying animal food from the zoos. Furthermore, many zoos have insufficient funds to maintain the food supply for their animals, which leads to cannibalism in some species.

On the other hand, I believe zoos play a critical role in preserving endangered animals whose habitats are in danger by virtue of human activities. Firstly, despite the artificial environment, zoos are better shelters for them with sufficient food and drink supply compared to their original ones. The risk of exotic animals being attacked by poachers would also be eliminated with the guarding and care from zoos. Hence, zoos are good places to ensure the safety of the animals and an ideal environment for their reproduction. Secondly, animals are given prompt medical care in case of emergency by experienced veterinarians, which they may not have access to when injured in nature. Additionally, scientists and biologists can observe and study the animals’ behaviour more easily if they live in zoos that are equipped with good facilities.

To sum up, while others blame zoos for their cruelty, it seems to me that endangered species are best protected in wildlife parks.

Sample 5:

Zoos remain popular places for people to visit for entertainment and to learn about wild animals. Although some people are of the opinion that zoos can provide a sanctuary for endangered animals and so should be kept open, I believe that the cruelty that animals suffer outweighs this benefit, and that they should be shut down.

These days, animals are under threat from humans in many ways, seen for example in the way that their habitats are being destroyed through the cutting down of rain forests, or through poaching. Following on from this, the argument is that zoos can protect some of these animals that are under threat. The reason is that they are in a safe environment managed by trained staff who can ensure the animals are looked after and can produce offspring. There are examples of successes in this respect, such as with Pandas, which have been endangered for many years but have been protected.

However, there are more convincing arguments for why zoos should be shut down. Firstly, even though some species are under threat, there are lots of animals which do not fall into this category and who are there just for the entertainment of visitors. While it may be fun and educational to see them, animals are not meant to be caged, and their distress can often be seen in the way many of them pace back and forwards all day. Not only this, if the prime reason for zoos is to protect animals, this could be done in other environments such as wildlife parks where the animals have more freedom.

In conclusion, animals should be protected but this does not have to be in zoos. Zoos are cruel to animals, not similar enough to their natural habitat, and they should be closed down. 

Sample 6:

Although many people think that zoos should be closed as it is cruel to keep animals in zoos, I think that zoos play a key role in wildlife protection.

First, it is believed that keeping wild animals in captivity might deprive them of their freedom. Wild animals are caged in a limited space and fed by humans while they long for a natural way of life. Therefore, many of them might suffer from boredom and confinement. Second, many governments might see zoos as an opportunity to make money. For example, many wild animals are exhibited and perform to entertain and attract visitors to the zoo. Many people claim that we have no right to use animals for entertainment and profit, so they think that zoos should be closed down.

However, those who are against zoos might ignore the important role of zoos in protecting wild animals. In fact, most of the animals kept in zoos are endangered as they are unable to survive or experience difficulty finding mates and reproducing in the wild. Zoos are the only safe environment to protect them from poachers, predators, or help them breed. Furthermore, these animals are saved by scientists working at zoos to study closely animals and their behaviour to help with environmental protection. As this type of research is often carried out away from the public, many people might not realise the useful purpose of zoos in wildlife protection.

In conclusion, the view that zoos keep wild animals in a cruel way is reinforced with a lack of awareness about the role of zoos in protecting the habitat. I think that zoos should allow people to view what they are doing in wildlife protection to gain appreciation from the public.

Sample 7:

Zoos have been around for centuries, even London Tower used to be one, providing refuge for animals and entertainment for humans. Going to a zoo is always a fun day for children as well as being educational, although I’m not sure that the animals, who find themselves severely restricted, would agree.

Zoos started as purely a curiosity for citizens, bringing exotic animals from hitherto unknown regions was a major attraction, even though few of the animals survived long, due to a lack of knowledge of what the animals needed to survive and unsuitable conditions. Moving on to the last 50 years or so, during which zoos have become far better homes for wildlife, with specially trained zoologists ensuring they have everything they need to live a long healthy life. In fact, they usually live longer than they do in the wild.

A lot of scientific research is performed in zoos as well, this can help zoologists to better understand the needs of the animal in the zoo and in the wild, thus helping to keep numbers up worldwide. For children, a day trip to a menagerie is especially exciting because they get to see creatures they’ve only seen in 2D previously. Nothing compares to being only a few inches away from a fearsome predator such as a leopard.

In reality, though, zoos are not a natural environment for wild animals. Predators need to hunt, all animals need to mate freely, as well as have sufficient space to roam in as nature determines. Zoos are obviously severely restrictive to movement and all other natural actions of animals; this is deemed as cruel by most compassionate beings.

Overall, zoos are not the best thing for wildlife as they hamper their natural instincts. However, there are some intrinsic benefits that make it kind of ok to have zoos, provided they are run humanely.

Sample 8:

More and more concerns about animal welfare are being raised, causing heated debate recently. While some people claim that zoos are cruel, others believe that they offer society and wildlife a wide range of benefits. This essay analyzes both sides of the argument before my personal perspective is given.

On one hand, institutionalization of wild animals can, in some cases, put them at certain risk and in precarious situations that should be immediately stopped. First, the artificial and cramped environments in some zoos cannot serve sufficiently the animals’ need for room and space to grow fully and healthily. This would lead to several acute physical and mental problems, ranging from obesity to depression, for these caged animals. Second, animals living outside of their natural environment and social structure are deprived of the right to develop their natural instincts and sense of identity. Wild animals fed by zookeepers tend to lose their hunting ability and turn to depend on human support for survival.

On the other hand, there are strong reasons for some to believe that zoos are the main contributor to wildlife conservation. Nowadays, ever-growing industrialization and its consequences such as heavy pollution and deforestation are threatening natural species and putting them at a greater risk of extinction. Zoos can serve as wildlife conservation areas which provide endangered animals with shelter and food, and also protect them from illegal hunting and abuse. Furthermore, zoos are key to the mission of maintaining biodiversity through conducting breeding programs which ensure the reproduction of rare species. Such an attempt would contribute to preventing animal extinction and maintaining animal diversity around the globe.

In conclusion, both views have their own arguments. However, on balance, I am more convinced in the modern world where people pay more attention to animal welfare, most zoos are ethically run, so they are of paramount importance in aiding to conserve threatened animals. Therefore, these places should not be banned outright for any reason; otherwise, endangered animals left in natural environments would face more danger.

Sample 9:

Some consider zoos to be cruel and should not exist while others express trust in the protection of wild animals by zoos. This essay will clarify both viewpoints and emphasizes the necessity of zoos.

Zoos can be a harsh habitat for animals in captivity. Actually, the area in zoos is extremely limited compared to wide open national parks or forests; therefore, detained animals will definitely feel uncomfortable and unwell. Sadly, it is almost a guaranteed failure for someone to come to any zoo to take pictures of animals running around in happiness or enjoying being watched by humans. Instead, what they find is that the animals hide deep in their caves or tiringly and sadly walk or lie on well-worn concrete grounds. Small cages for animals are like shackles on our limbs that deprive them of the most precious right, the right for freedom. Moreover, some animals in zoos are trained and exploited in circus performances, which makes their lives even more miserable.

However, zoos are no doubt a haven for wildlife, especially for endangered animals. They provide safe and nutritious food together with fast medical responses for sick animals. That ensures animals can prolong their lives and avoid dangers of becoming preys for predators in the wild due to physical debilitation from old age, sicknesses or wounds. It is even more meaningful when zoos are considered as a genetic reservation for endangered animals when their counterparts at large may be subjected to catastrophes like severe poaching in African savannas or the vast bushfires in Australia in late 2019 and early 2020 that devoured millions of acres of forest and burned alive hundreds of millions of animals right in their natural homes. In such cases, a few animals in zoos will keep the hope of a reproduction program to save them from complete disappearance from the Earth.

In conclusion, although zoos are negative for animals in some ways, keeping them is apparently meaningful especially for endangered animals whose survival chances in the wild are low and risks of extinction are so alarming.

Sample 10:

While some people find it cruel for wild animals to be kept in zoos and consider that zoos should be shut down, others consider that zoos are a place where wild animals are usually kept protected from any kind of harm. The essay would discuss both opinions and I would provide my own opinion in the end.

Wild animals in zoos are mostly kept in cages where they are not protected but rather kept captive. Most importantly, these wild animals who are supposed to be taken care of, preserved and protected find themselves in a place where they become an amusement for the common people. Moreover, it is important to consider the fact that the survival skills of these wild animals become weaker because they are provided food, preventing them from hunting for their own food.

On the other hand, most people consider that zoos are helpful for protecting these wild animals from the hunters and poachers in the wild. Moreover, with deforestation being at its peak for more cities to grow, the wild animals are becoming more prone to the lack of natural habitat, endangering them on a high scale. Based on these aspects, people think that wild animals are more protected in zoos.

It is true that keeping wild animals in zoos can be cruel considering that they are held as hostages, with rapid urbanization and deforestation. In my opinion, given the current state of rapid industrial developments, zoos are the best place for the safety of wild animals.

Sample 1:

Plastic containers and cutleries are becoming a ubiquitous part of the eating-out experience. However, I do think that the disadvantages of using plastic in the food and drink industries outweigh the advantages of doing so.  

On the one hand, using plastic is convenient for both street vendors and consumers. Most plastic containers can be discarded after a single use, eliminating the need to wash them. Moreover, plastic does not break easily in contrast to glass containers, making them easier to carry around. Another reason is that plastic containers and cutleries are dirt cheap to produce. Because the materials needed to synthesize plastics are readily available, most plastic containers are at a lower price than their alternatives, especially in bulk.

On the other hand, however, using plastics to store food can pose both a health and an environmental risk. Firstly, most plastic containers end up in the ocean, which will damage marine life. Fish can swallow these plastic cutleries, cannot digest them, and thus die. Plastic is also detrimental to landfills as they decompose relatively slowly, leading to landfill overloads. Secondly, consuming food and drinks using plastic can be harmful. Plastics are known to melt and release toxic compounds when heated, so they should not be used to store hot foods. Another concern is that some plastics contain carcinogens. This means that consumers are at a higher risk of developing cancer.  

In conclusion, convenience and low prices are reasons why people use plastics to store food and drinks. However, I think that the disadvantages of plastic to the environment and consumers’ health far outweigh the advantages of plastics.

Sample 2:

The use of plastic containers has become more and more common over the last few decades, particularly in the food and beverage industry. Personally, I think that the drawbacks of plastic use far outweigh any benefits it may bring.

The two main advantages of plastic packaging are the cost and convenience. Single-use plastic packaging, such as cups and containers used in the food and beverage industry, are generally very cheap to manufacture, and this helps to keep the cost of take-away products affordable for consumers. Single-use plastic packaging is also very convenient. These days, most people often have very busy schedules and are always on the go, and quite often need to buy take-away food and drinks. Plastic containers allow people to maintain their busy lives and demanding schedules while generally being able to eat and drink what they please.

However, the costs and conveniences of single-use plastic packaging are far outweighed by the long-term destruction it causes to the environment and to people’s health. Nowadays, many countries around the world are facing a plastic pollution crisis, with oceans, rivers, and landfills full of unrecyclable plastic waste which takes hundreds and thousands of years to break down. Meanwhile, millions of aquatic animals are dying every year from ingesting plastic waste floating in the planet’s waterways, while millions of people around the world are suffering the health effects of breathing in toxic fumes from the burning of plastic waste.

In conclusion, the effect that plastic packaging is having on the planet is devastating, and unnecessary. For a tiny extra cost, businesses could move to using packaging made from recyclable or biodegradable materials. Furthermore, individuals can start to make a habit of carrying their own reusable containers, such as reusable coffee cups.

Sample 3:

Using plastic containers for various food products has become ubiquitous in recent decades. Though this has potential drawbacks for the environment, I believe it does not outweigh the benefits to businesses and individuals.

The environmental cost of disposable plastic containers is massive. Before plastics, foods and drinks were typically put into biodegradable, eco-friendly paper or cardboard. The arrival of plastics has impacted the environment on two major fronts. Firstly, plastic itself is a fossil fuel byproduct that requires crude oil for its production and later transportation. The emissions from fossil fuels are often cited as the chief contributor to the hastening of climate change. Moreover, the containers themselves either find their way to landfills, polluting previously pristine land, or end up in the ocean, forming ‘land masses’ that are injurious to marine life.

Nonetheless, the concomitant problems of plastic containers listed above do not override their usefulness. For companies, using plastic containers is cheap and allows for uniform consistency. This is the reason why they have been adopted by companies ranging from fast food giants like McDonald’s to local grocery chains. This savings is then passed on to the consumer who enjoys cheaper prices and the many conveniences of plastic containers. They are less likely to rip open and spill compared with paper and most families make use of them afterwards for leftover food. If plastic containers for food items were banned not only would people lose these conveniences, but many companies would have to radically alter their packaging, and potentially, products themselves.

In conclusion, the environmental impact of plastic containers does little to undermine their value for both corporations and the average customer. It is instead important to explore innovations to make plastics more environmentally friendly.

Sample 4:

In the contemporary era, the ubiquity of plastic containers has surged unprecedentedly, becoming the packaging material of choice for myriad food and beverage companies globally. This essay posits that, despite their convenience and cost-effectiveness, the disadvantages of this trend significantly outweigh the advantages. The ensuing paragraphs will delve into the environmental repercussions and health concerns associated with plastic use, alongside a brief exploration of their benefits.

The primary advantage of plastic containers, undeniably, lies in their unparalleled convenience and economic feasibility. Their lightweight nature and durability make transportation and storage exceedingly efficient, offering substantial cost savings for businesses. Moreover, plastic's versatility allows for the creation of containers in various shapes and sizes, catering to a wide range of products. This adaptability, combined with the ability to preserve the freshness of food and drinks, underscores the rationale behind their pervasive adoption.

However, the environmental toll of this convenience is both profound and far-reaching. Plastic containers, which have become more common than ever before, contribute significantly to global pollution, with millions of tons ending up in landfills and oceans annually. The non-biodegradable nature of most plastics means they persist in the environment for centuries, causing harm to marine life and ecosystems. Furthermore, the production process of plastic emits large quantities of greenhouse gases, exacerbating climate change. These environmental impacts present a formidable challenge, overshadowing the benefits plastic containers offer.

Besides environmental concerns, the health implications associated with the chemicals in plastics, such as Bisphenol A (BPA), cannot be overlooked. Studies suggest that these substances can leach into food and beverages, potentially leading to hormonal imbalances and increased cancer risk among consumers. This risk factor adds another layer to the disadvantages of plastic containers, urging a reevaluation of their widespread use.

In conclusion, while plastic containers have become more common than ever before, offering undeniable benefits to the food and beverage industry, the environmental and health ramifications present a compelling case against their continued dominance. The need for sustainable alternatives has never been more critical, as the long-term well-being of our planet and its inhabitants hangs in the balance.

Sample 5:

The proliferation of plastic containers in the modern food and beverage industry represents a critical juncture in our global consumption patterns. This essay contends that the drawbacks of this trend significantly overshadow its benefits, particularly when considering environmental sustainability and health implications. Through an in-depth analysis, it will highlight the detrimental effects of widespread plastic use against its convenience and economic advantages.

On one hand, plastic containers offer undeniable utility. Their prevalence, underscored by the fact that they have become more common than ever before, is largely attributed to their lightweight nature and cost-effectiveness. These attributes not only reduce transportation costs but also enhance the shelf life of products, thereby minimizing food waste. Moreover, the adaptability of plastics allows for innovative packaging designs, meeting diverse consumer needs with unparalleled efficiency. This convenience factor has undeniably contributed to the global surge in their utilization.

However, the environmental degradation wrought by this surge cannot be overstated. The enduring presence of plastics, a testament to their non-biodegradability, poses a severe threat to natural ecosystems. The alarming rate at which plastic containers are discarded leads to significant pollution, affecting terrestrial and marine life alike. Furthermore, the manufacturing of plastics is energy-intensive, releasing substantial quantities of carbon emissions that exacerbate the climate crisis. These environmental consequences reveal a glaring discrepancy between short-term convenience and long-term ecological health.

Additionally, the potential health hazards linked to chemical leachates from plastic containers have ignited widespread concern. Compounds such as BPA, known to disrupt endocrine function, underscore the hidden costs of convenience, revealing a troubling aspect of our dependency on plastics. The cumulative effect of such exposure raises serious questions about the safety of our daily consumption habits.

In conclusion, while the prevalence of plastic containers has indeed become more common than ever before, facilitating numerous practical advantages, the environmental and health risks they engender demand urgent attention. The evidence presented underlines the necessity for a paradigm shift towards sustainable alternatives, challenging both consumers and industries to reconsider the true cost of convenience. Achieving such a transition is imperative for the preservation of our planet and the well-being of future generations.

Sample 6:

Across various nations, plastic containers have become more common than ever before, and this increasing prevalence has sparked a debate on these items’ merits and demerits. While these containers offer undeniable convenience and affordability, their environmental impact casts a long shadow over these benefits. In this essay, I argue that the environmental costs of plastic containers far outweigh their advantages.

In the realm of practicality, plastic containers are unparalleled. Their lightweight nature and durability make them ideal for the modern, fast-paced lifestyle. For instance, a family on a picnic can easily pack and transport their meals in plastic containers, a convenience unavailable with heavier alternatives like glass or metal. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of plastic packaging allows food businesses to minimize expenses, ostensibly reducing the cost for consumers. However, these surface-level advantages mask deeper, more concerning environmental consequences.

The environmental toll of plastic containers is both profound and lasting. These synthetic materials, primarily derived from non-renewable fossil fuels, pose a significant challenge in waste management. Unlike organic materials, plastics do not decompose naturally, leading to accumulation in landfills and oceans. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a colossal collection of marine debris in the North Pacific Ocean, predominantly composed of plastics, stands as a testament to this burgeoning crisis. Furthermore, the production and disposal of plastic containers contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change.

Additionally, plastic waste poses a severe threat to wildlife. Numerous marine species, such as sea turtles and seabirds, often mistake plastic debris for food, leading to fatal consequences. Recent studies have shown an alarming rate of plastic ingestion among these species, indicating a dire need for change.

In conclusion, the convenience and affordability of plastic containers are significantly outweighed by their lasting environmental impacts, from the accumulation of non-decomposable waste to the threat they pose to wildlife.

Sample 7:

It is often argued that a plethora of worldwide food and beverage firms have been increasingly using plastic in various stages of their production and distribution. While this is blamed for releasing toxic components in the environment, I strongly believe that the benefits plastic materials are offering in terms of cheaper prices and delivery comforts are convincingly outweighing the associated drawbacks.

On one hand, our reckless plastic usage is the root cause of the environmental degradation, which is resulting in animal extinction, because we are constantly introducing this non-biodegradable material which is contaminating our air and soil. This pollution is interfering with the metabolism of animals, especially the large-bodied animals and rare species are more prone to this scenario, and eventually they are falling into a vicious cycle of annihilation. A study conducted by the Ministry of Environment in Lebanon has revealed that more than 20% of the asthma, endocrine disruption and other animal diseases diagnosed in 2020 were directly linked to dangerous chemicals released from burned plastic in the air.

On the other hand, regardless of the environmental downside, there are some incredible benefits of using this amazing material as it makes our life easier with cheaper products and faster packaging. Resorting to plastic, a low-cost input, companies lower their production cost which has a knock-on effect on overall retail price, making our money more worthy. In addition, when it comes to packaging and handling the products, plastic is simply nonparallel to anything. Its malleable character allows enterprises to use it in their own discretion whether it is for a packaging or a delivery purpose. For instance, recently in the quarantine period of 2020-2021, both buyers and sellers needed fast and safe handling of food and other emergency items, which would have been almost impossible without the involvement of plastic.

In conclusion, to some extent, plastic might hamper the overall environment, yet it is very essential for both consumers and producers’ points of views. Therefore, I firmly believe that the advantages of this material will forever be more rewarding than its disadvantages.

Sample 8:

The development of plastic is one of the revolutionary achievements of mankind. Today, it has become an inevitable part of human life and is the most commonly used material for packing by the food and beverage industry in many parts of the world. Even though it is a highly versatile material, I believe the demerits of plastic usage overshadows its relative merits.

To begin with, plastic is a major contributing factor of environmental degradation. Unlike some materials, plastic is not biodegradable and therefore its discardment is a challenging task. Plastic when burnt can produce toxic fumes and on the other hand if they are thrown into open ground, it takes hundreds of years to breakdown. This would not only degrade the environment in the form of various pollutions but is also a dominant threat for many living organisms as there are chances of it being consumed leading to the death of many animals and birds. A recent survey underlined plastic ingestion as a major cause of death due to toxicity in porpoises.

Besides, many studies have revealed that consumption of food stored in plastic containers is hazardous to human health. This is because some of the industries use low quality plastic containers to store the food items and may also store it inappropriately under unfavorable conditions. As a result, the consumables stored inside may get contaminated with toxins and consumption of the same leads to many health issues and can even cause cancer. This is the main reason why many scientists discourage the use of plastic for food storage.

However, plastic is the only material which can be manufactured at low cost but at the same time offers high durability and versatility making it the most preferred material for packing in industries today in comparison to the other alternatives available.

To conclude, being the most preferred material in the industrial world today, plastic can be seen in every walk of life. Regardless of the benefits it offers, I strongly believe its usage should be minimized because of the risk it poses to the environment and human life.

Sample 9:

The use of plastic products has become prevalent in many parts of the world. Personally, I believe that the drawbacks of using plastic containers far outweigh the benefits.

Admittedly, plastic bags, bottles and cans provide benefits for both businesses and consumers. Plastic containers are very versatile; they can be used to wrap food and drinks so that these products can safely and conveniently be delivered to consumers or to supermarkets. People can make an order and sit in the comfort of the home or the office and eat their meals. Many workers buy coffee and drink it while travelling to their workplace. Plastic pots, cartons or cans therefore contribute to the rising demand of take-away food and drinks, which generates millions of dollars for companies in the industry and provides great convenience to customers.

Despite the economic benefits mentioned above, I believe that the use of plastic packaging has a greater impact on the environment. Plastic products are typically not biodegradable, and they will remain intact for a long time after being used. Many plastic containers break into tiny fragments due to the effects of temperature and moisture, and these will enter into the food chain after marine animals eat them. Over the last decade, scientists have reported alarming threats to fish and other marine creatures because they unwittingly swallow tiny plastic waste in the ocean and rivers. People will then catch such fish and eat it, which has harmful effects on their health.
In conclusion, despite some decided advantages of using plastic containers, I believe that environmental impacts are more worrying. It is now reaching a tipping point and the government must enact reforms to curb plastic use to protect the environment and human health.

Sample 10:

There is a growing trend toward the use of cheap and convenient materials such as plastics in the food and beverage sectors. Although this tendency bestows numerous benefits upon society, I believe that those plastic products take a heavy toll on the environment, all of which will be discussed in the section below.

To begin with, there are a host of compelling reasons why the use of plastic-based products is beneficial to some extent. One reason worth mentioning is that plastic bags appear economical for both consumers and producers because the cost of producing them is relatively low, which does not put a strain on a company’s coffers, thereby generating more income and profits for the entrepreneurs’ owners. Thus, employees could be paid a higher salary, leading to an improvement in their quality of life. More importantly, plastic is a durable and versatile material. Therefore, plastic containers would not normally take up much room and are easily discarded. For instance, it is more advantageous for consumers to hold millions of nylon bags and put them in trash bins after use, compared to bulky paper bags.

However, those aforementioned benefits pale in comparison with the dramatic disadvantages of using plastic-based products. Firstly, it is undoubtedly true that the mass consumption of plastic bags has caused long-lasting environmental pollution, which is the first and most serious issue. To be more specific, it may take hundreds of years for used plastic containers to be completely dissolved. Moreover, they pile up on the land and release toxic chemicals that severely contaminate oceans and soil. Secondly, the overuse of plastic does harm the whole ecosystem. For example, a vast majority of species have choked and swallowed particles and debris released deep into the ground and ocean, which disorders the animal’s digestive function and puts them on the verge of extinction.

All in all, the ubiquity of plastic containers indeed brings about convenience and flexibility. However, it seems to me that the downside of this tendency is more noteworthy than its upside.

Sample 1:

In recent years, there has been a significant decrease in the amount of time individuals spend at home, compared to previous decades. This trend can be attributed to the growing popularity of social activities and leisure pursuits outside the home environment. This shift away from domestic spaces is influenced by various factors, such as the expansion of entertainment options, changes in societal norms, and increasing urbanization. For example, the proliferation of trendy cafes and community events has created a strong allure for individuals seeking social connections and new experiences. Additionally, the development of public spaces featuring parks and recreational facilities provides attractive alternatives to staying indoors, enticing people to venture out for leisure and social interaction.

The reduced time spent at home as a result of the increasing popularity of social pursuits can have significant repercussions on personal relaxation. The inability to engage in personal recreation within the comfort of one’s home may contribute to heightened stress levels and overall diminished well-being. Consequently, individuals may struggle to find time to engage in activities that promote relaxation and fulfillment within the familiar confines of their own homes. As a result, the lack of opportunity to partake in these activities within the home environment may lead to increased stress and a sense of dissatisfaction with daily life.

In conclusion, the increasing preference for social activities outside the home has both advantages and disadvantages for individual well-being. While it facilitates the formation of new friendships and the exploration of different experiences, it may also disrupt the ability to unwind at home. Therefore, it is essential to strike a balance between socializing outside and enjoying quiet time at home to maintain overall happiness. Encouraging the development of community spaces within residential areas, such as neighborhood gardens, can provide opportunities for social interaction and relaxation closer to home, effectively balancing the appeal of external activities with the comfort of the domestic environment.

Sample 2:

In contemporary society, the amount of time individuals spend at home has largely diminished. From my perspective, there are several main reasons for this trend, and its effects on individuals and society are noteworthy.

Firstly, due to the demands of modern work environments, individuals are consistently occupied with their jobs and often do not return home until the evening or even late at night. Additionally, they dedicate considerable time to socializing with friends and engaging in similar activities. Moreover, there has been a significant rise in services such as dining, entertainment, retail, and travel, which attract people with their convenience and interest. Consequently, the time spent at home has decreased over time.

Furthermore, children nowadays not only study at school but also attend various extra classes due to the competitive nature of today’s high school and university entrance exams, as well as the high expectations of parents regarding their academic performance. This phenomenon is prevalent in numerous countries, particularly in densely populated capitals or cities. For instance, Hanoi, Vietnam, being a crowded city, demands that individuals possess the qualifications necessary to secure lucrative employment, which largely depends on their skills, knowledge, and the institutions they attended. Consequently, students exert considerable effort in their studies to secure a brighter future.

The decrease in people’s time at home has both advantageous and detrimental effects on individuals and society. On one hand, due to their dedication to their occupations, the nation’s economy is steadily advancing. Moreover, the utilization of a plethora of services contributes to a promising future where fewer citizens have to worry about financial problems. Additionally, students’ intense studying may potentially produce a generation filled with individuals who possess expertise in various fields and skills.

On the other hand, fewer interactions with family members due to less time spent at home may result in an invisible distance between them, causing feelings of loneliness and a lack of affection. Consequently, this trend may lead to depression, stress, and other mental health issues. Since this phenomenon has occurred, both individuals and society must confront disadvantages while also being presented with opportunities for a better life.

In conclusion, the trend of spending less time at home is influenced by various factors in today’s society. While it offers certain advantages, such as economic advancement and increased expertise, it also poses challenges related to familial relationships and mental well-being. Thus, it is essential to address both the positive and negative aspects of this trend for the betterment of individuals and society as a whole.

Sample 3:

These days there is a rising trend that the people are more involved in outdoor activities rather than spending time at home. There are multiple causes for this, including a busy life, tough official routine and an increased social circle, but that behaviour has a detrimental effect on both the individual and the family relationship as well as on the society.

Due to the fast pace of life, the people are busy round the clock either to earn the living or to achieve more success. The changing world scenarios have not only prolonged the working hours, but have also increased the number of business gatherings and parties. Moreover, the kids of the current era are even more connected to their friends and are involved in different outdoor activities. Overall, it has a negative impact, as the members don't get enough time to mingle with each other. For instance, according to a research, an average American spends only 6 hours at home in a day.

The less interaction of the members at home has a negative impact on the relationship as well as on the grooming of the kids. There is an increase in the divorce rate, psychological problems in the children and agitated behaviour of the adults. Secondly, the moral and character failure cases like murders, theft, rapes and terrorism have increased many folds. Thus, the overall behaviour of the society has declined. For example, the street crime rate in the Pakistan has doubled in the last 5 years.

To conclude, a balance has to be maintained in every walk of life. The ties between the families ought to be strengthened, in order to bring peace and tranquility in our lives. So to say, a little change in the lifestyle will bring prosperity.

Sample 4:

Recently, a lot of people have spent little time at home and more time in the public space. This is caused by lack of job and unstable power supply which has in turn increased the traffic gridlock on the roads and unavailability of public transport.

To begin, unemployment has caused a lot of people to go out in search of a job and greener pastures as they cannot fend for themselves merely by sitting indoors. As a result of this, people often go out every day in search of a job. Also, people who are employed need to go out to their various places of work every day to fulfil their goals and achieve their aims. Furthermore, interrupted power supply has caused many people to leave their homes to lounges, bars or restaurant to cool off the heat. To illustrate, there is a constant interrupted power supply in Lagos and most people usually leave their homes to hang out with friends in bars or other places in order to cool off the heat.

Consequently, incessant outings by individuals in societies will cause an increase in road congestion. In other words, as more people move out to be in one place or the other, so will the traffic gridlock tighten. Subsequently, there will be an unavailability of public transportation because more people are moving out and commuting by public transit, which is likely less than the available vehicles coupled with gridlock.

In conclusion, the reason many people spend most of their time outdoors is because of unemployment and or employment and unstable light which will lead to an increase in traffic congestion and the unavailability of means of transportation.

Sample 5:

Recently, a growing number of individuals have spent lesser amount of time in their houses. This essay will discuss the reasons for this occurrence, which include the sheer need to be successful in life and the problems associated with living in an overpopulated city and the effect it has on society.

One of the major causes of individuals spending a little amount of time at home is the constant quest for improvement in their quality of life. This has resulted in an over-worked and overwhelmed population of folks and has also ensured the continued growth of productive people, especially in the urban areas of the world. Another major cause is associated with a growing number of folks in the cities being prone to traffic gridlocks. As a result, these people tend to spend a great amount of quality period in traffic jams and end up not getting to their destinations until the wee hours of the day. For example, an average Lagosian spends about five hours in traffic. This is in addition to the statutory eight hours spent at work.

A major consequence of this in society is the continued churning out of a sad and unfulfilled population. This stems from the fact that people tend to devote too much valuable time to work, and earning a living, thereby, ending up being unhappy, rather than enjoying valuable moments with friends and family. Also, the repercussion of constant work on the workforce is the drastic drop in the quality of health. For instance, they are always stressed, hence, susceptible to stress-related illnesses, some of which are life-threatening. A link has been established between high blood pressure and regular stress. According to the World Health Organization, two out of ten people who are involved in strenuous activities end up becoming hypertensive before age 40.

To conclude, while it is commendable that individuals strive to become great, and influential in life. The resultant effects of the stress and strains undergone during this process impact both the individual and the society negatively and positively. It is however recommended that proper attention should be paid to the physical and mental health of individuals to prevent a crackdown in the psyches of the workforce.

Sample 1:

Nowadays, parents motivate their children to indulge in various kinds of activities and doing a part time job is one of them. In this essay, I will shed some light on the pros and cons of doing a part time job.

It is evident that parents are supporting their children to do part time jobs; thereby, leading to obvious outcomes: the children learn the importance of money and also become a responsible person. Doing part-time job at an early stage of life not only teaches them the importance of earning money, but also prevents them from being a spendthrift. For instance, during my college days, I used to take part-time tuition classes which taught me to save my hard-earned money. Further, working part time also makes the children a responsible person. To exemplify, odd-jobs like a pizza-boy teach the children how the employer is dependent on them to run his business; consequently, they do their work seriously/ sincerely and take complete responsibility.

However, every coin has two sides and despite all the advantages of a temporary job, there are some drawbacks too. Firstly, it will disturb the regular schedule of the children. To illustrate, the students are already burdened with their own study schedule; therefore, doing other jobs will affect their studies. Moreover, they will not be able to spend time with their parents. To exemplify, children will have to do a part-time job in evening or night only after the school hours; as a result, they may not be able to spend any quality time with their parents.

In conclusion, a part-time job has a plethora of advantages and disadvantages. On balance, however, I tend to believe that parents should motivate/ encourage their children to do the part-time job as it teaches them better qualities; provided that, they manage their daily routine properly.

Sample 2:

Encouraging children to have a part-time job in their free time is a topic of discussion. This essay explores the advantages and disadvantages of children engaging in part- time employment. While such experiences can develop important life skills, promote independence, and foster a sense of responsibility, they may also impact academic performance and limit leisure activities.

Having a part-time job offers several advantages for children. Firstly, it helps develop crucial life skills such as time management and financial responsibility. Balancing work, school, and personal commitments teaches them how to prioritize tasks and manage their time effectively. Additionally, earning their own money allows children to learn about financial responsibility, budgeting, and the value of hard work.

Part-time jobs can also promote independence and self-reliance among children. Through work experience, they gain confidence and problem-solving skills, becoming more self-assured and capable of handling challenges. Furthermore, having a job instills a sense of responsibility and accountability, as they must meet work obligations and fulfill their duties as employees.

However, there are potential disadvantages to consider. One such concern is the impact on academic performance. Balancing work and school commitments can be challenging, leading to increased stress and potential fatigue. Limited time for studying and completing assignments may result in decreased academic performance. It is essential to find a balance that prioritizes academic success while allowing for work experience.

Another drawback is the limited time available for leisure activities and personal development. Part-time jobs can reduce opportunities for children to engage in extracurricular activities, pursue hobbies, and socialize with friends. This could potentially hinder their personal growth and limit their overall well-being.

In conclusion, encouraging children to have part-time jobs can provide valuable advantages in terms of life skills development, independence, and responsibility. However, it is important to consider potential disadvantages, such as the impact on academic performance and limited leisure time. Parents and guardians should support children in making informed decisions about part-time employment, considering their overall well-being and academic priorities. By finding the right balance, children can reap the benefits of part-time work while continuing to excel academically and engage in a well-rounded lifestyle.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, it's common practice to encourage kids to work part-time jobs during their free time. Although it aids in instilling confidence and the habit of hard effort in children, it also has significant disadvantages.

Part-time employment will firstly assist the kids in comprehending. In addition, it will also allow them to experience the challenges and sufferings their parents go through on a daily basis in order to raise them. Children will attempt to share some of the obligations, and they will be able to appreciate the effort put forward by their parents as a result. They will recognise the value of giving and caring. Children will learn the value of interdependence and accepting their peers by participating in group activities.

A part-time job also gives them a taste of their future and teaches them how to discipline their lives and organise them. Further, learn to strike a balance between their personal and professional lives.

On the other hand, children's mental and physical growth would be hampered by a lack of leisure time. They won't have as much time to play and develop their fine motor skills because they will be required to work after school. Children's social and moral problems will increase as a result of the opportunity to earn money at a young age. They will use their lack of financial management skills to indulge in antisocial behaviours like drinking and smoking.

Additionally, part-time employment will limit their chances to socialise with their age-group friends.

A part-time job can help children develop traits like interdependence, self-confidence, and the fortitude to tackle challenges in real life. But it can also have an impact on their mental and physical growth. They shouldn't sacrifice their excitement and understanding gained from reading stories and interacting with peers for other purposes.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, parents encourage their kids to participate in a variety of activities, working a part-time job being one of them. I'll discuss the benefits and drawbacks of working a part-time job in this essay.

It is clear that parents encourage their kids to work part-time, which has obvious results in helping the kids. It makes them understand the value of money and helps them develop into responsible adults. Early on in life, taking up a part-time job not only helps kids learn the value of money but also keeps them from becoming wasteful. For instance, I learned how to save my hard-earned money while attending part-time tuition programmes during my undergraduate years. The children become more responsible as a result of their part-time employment. For instance, odd occupations like becoming a pizza delivery boy show kids how their employer depends on them to run their business. So they take their work seriously and accept full responsibility.

A temporary job does have some disadvantages, yet, as with all things, there are two sides to every story. The children's regular schedule will be disturbed first. As an example, if the students already have a full schedule of classes, taking on additional work will interfere with their academics. Furthermore, they won't be able to visit their parents. Children, for instance, will only be allowed to work part-time jobs in the evenings or at night after school. This may prevent them from having meaningful time with their parents.

In conclusion, there are many benefits and drawbacks to working a part-time job. Overall, though, I tend to think that parents should encourage their kids to work a part-time job. Because it will teach them better skills; just make sure they handle their daily schedule effectively.

Sample 5:

Parents these days encourage their kids to work during downtime. Even if getting a job after school seems like a great way to fill downtime, this trend has some drawbacks. The advantages and disadvantages of working a part-time job after school will be covered in this article.

Children will gain practical work experience thanks to part-time employment, which is one of its benefits. Additionally, it will assist students in developing work skills including how to successfully complete a job application. In addition to that, excel in interviews, and work under supervision. According to a University of California poll, businesses tend to hire youngsters who used to work after school. They preferred them more than those without any prior work experience. Therefore, gaining work experience while in school will not only demonstrate that students have had some exposure to the working world. But it will also provide them with a competitive edge over their peers while looking for employment.

However, doing a part-time job has several disadvantages. For instance, kids who work will not have enough time to study and complete their schoolwork since they would be weary and need to take a break. Therefore, working while learning could hinder one's ability to study. Additionally, kids who work part-time jobs may become disinterested in continuing their education. When young individuals attain financial independence at such a young age. They may begin to disregard their education and may become distracted by the illusion of short-term financial security.

In conclusion, holding a part-time job while a student may have some advantages. But it is important to remember the drawbacks of starting young. If a job could interfere with a student's academics, it should be discouraged.

Sample 6:

Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part-time job during their free time. There are many reasons why parents consider this to be a good idea. Some parents believe that part-time jobs help children to learn responsibility and time management skills. Others believe that it helps children to earn money, which can be used to pay for their own expenses or save for future needs.

One of the main advantages of part-time jobs is that it teaches children responsibility. When children work part-time, they learn the importance of showing up on time, following instructions, and being accountable for their actions. These skills are not only valuable in the workplace but also in everyday life, as they contribute to personal growth and development.

Another benefit of part-time jobs is that they teach children time management skills. By balancing school, extracurricular activities, and work, children learn how to prioritize their responsibilities and manage their time effectively. This skill is valuable throughout their life, especially when they become busy adults who need to juggle multiple responsibilities.

Additionally, part-time jobs can offer children financial independence. Earning money from part-time work can give children a sense of independence and responsibility. They can use the money they earn to pay for their own expenses, such as clothing or entertainment. Children can also save their earnings for future expenses, like college tuition or a car. This kind of independence can help children build confidence and become more self-reliant.

However, there are also potential drawbacks to children working part-time jobs. For example, part-time jobs can sometimes interfere with schoolwork, extracurricular activities, or family time. If a child is working long hours, they may not have enough time to complete their homework, study for tests, or spend time with their family. These factors can lead to stress, anxiety, and burnout, which can negatively impact a child’s overall well-being.

Another risk associated with part-time jobs is that they can expose children to unsafe or inappropriate work environments. Children must be careful when selecting a job and ensure that their employers are reputable and trustworthy. Parents can play a vital role in guiding their children towards jobs that are appropriate for their age and education level while emphasizing the importance of safety and security.

To conclude, part-time jobs can be a positive experience for children if approached correctly. Parents should ensure that their children are taking on appropriate jobs that do not conflict with their schoolwork, extracurricular activities, or family time, while emphasizing safety and security. Part-time jobs can help children develop valuable skills, such as responsibility, time management, and financial independence. By balancing these risks and benefits, parents can provide their children with an essential step towards personal growth and success.

Sample 7:

Many parents inspire their children to work during their leisure time. Although an after-school job seems like an excellent approach to using free time, this trend bears some negative impacts. In this essay, I will discuss the numerous benefits and its perceived drawbacks in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, the advantages of kids partaking in side hustles while schooling has benefits like earning extra cash which would go a long way in solving little needs the child may have. Also, another merit to doing a part-time job as a kid is the knowledge they will acquire. Interpersonal skills and communication skills are acquired mainly through daily interaction and engagements. For instance, a child working part-time with an eatery will interact with at least 10persons in a day. Needless to say, these merits stand out in good stead, as far as augmenting the chances of excellence and prosperity is concerned.

Conversely, the demerits of temporary jobs as a kid include the lack of time and focus on their study. As a result of tedious activities with school and work, the child will always come back very tired thereby having little energy to read and practice what was taught. Also, exposing a kid to earning money at a young could make the child not be interested in furthering their education. For example, the majority of teenagers in the US halt their education at the college stage due to the ability to start earning wages afterwards. These issues, however, are not applicable to every child.

To summarize, there are merits and demerits involved in encouraging a child to work part-time in their free time. There is a plethora of people who opine that it is the duty of the parent to access and make decisions that will be beneficiary to their child.

Sample 8:

Nowadays, many adolescents want to start working as soon as they can to have money for their hobbies and desires; however, this may not be that advantageous to their academic performance and development. This essay will look at both the drawbacks and the benefits of having a part-time job in early teens.

Firstly, if young adults enter the working environment early, they will be able to learn how to appreciate more what their parents do every day. They will start to understand money’s value and how to work hard for their needs while learning how to be an employee and have a manager. A lot of part-time jobs are suitable for youngsters, for example, selling and distributing newspapers in their neighbourhood or dog-walking. Moreover, children start to become more mature and responsible for their acts, while they acquire skills for their future. Many careers, like sales managers and distributors, could be attained easily if the person has experience working in the field from a young age.

On the other hand, a great disadvantage of a part-time job is that some adolescents might like being an employee too much and change their employment to full time. That is because they see that they can earn a salary without an academic degree, hence the desire to continue their studies disappears. The primary goal of a child is to go to school and pursue a successful career, therefore, working may affect his academic path. Another drawback would be that some workplaces are dangerous for young individuals and may expose them to risky situations. For instance, working on the streets distributing newspapers could be dangerous because they could be exposed to car accidents and violent animals, such as dogs.

To conclude, although having a job from a young age has benefits on one’s development and future skills, parents should encourage their offsprings to use their free time for entertainment and not for work purposes.

Sample 1:

The advent of the Internet and digital technologies has allowed organizations to simulate full-fledged work or study environments at home. This is arguably a major breakthrough regarding workflow and study management despite some obvious, yet mitigable, repercussions.

Flexible work/study arrangement may increase the teleworkers and distance learners’ susceptibility to distractions caused by the comfort of the home environment, potentially reducing the work quality. Without the supervision of managers or instructors, task completion among the remote workers/students may be impeded by the temptation of various forms of entertainment available, such as social media or video games. This is particularly problematic among those with poor self-regulation skills. However, these issues can be mitigated by the adoption of deadline-driven management, which measures performance by one's ability to meet the deadlines. A bigger concern is the absence of human interaction, which leads to a greater chance of misunderstanding and limited opportunities for meaningful relationship building. This can be partially solved by creating occasions for socializing, where people can forge a better bond with others.

By contrast, the notable implications of distance work and study include, among other things, cost/time efficiency and the possibility for continuity during crises. Remote employees and students can effectively finish their work, report progress to their supervisors, and attend group discussions at their computer desk, cutting travel time and expenditures on gasoline and transport. From a business perspective, spacious offices and schools with prohibitive rent and overheads are no longer necessary now that most meetings can be held with video conferencing software. Besides, home-based working/studying offers the option to maintain business and school activities during challenging periods such as wartime or infectious disease outbreaks, when gatherings are unsafe and therefore inadvisable.

All things considered, the phenomenon in question is a great stride towards sustainable education and business as long as the drawbacks are properly addressed.

Sample 2:

It is a plain truth that there is a rising trend of online schooling and telecommuting as modern computer technology enables people to connect to each other effortlessly. From my perspective, this is a positive development since it benefits both individuals and society significantly.

Firstly, in relation to individuals, computer technology brings education and job opportunities to everyone, especially those who are under tough circumstances. Conventional schooling and working style are only available to a limited number of people who have resources of time and capital. However, new technologies, particularly computer ones, have empowered everyone to learn and work effectively in spite of their difficulties. For example, a mother who has to stay at home to take care of her new-born baby and (her) old mother can do an online job to support her family financially. Students in low-income families who have to work in the daytime to make ends meet can attend Internet-based courses at night. Children living in remote areas, where travelling to school might sometimes be risky, can now take online classes through their connected computer.

Secondly, on the level of society, the fact that education and job opportunities become reachable to a higher number of computer users means that human resources are expanded and improved. To be specific, there is a larger workforce since more people can contribute to the productivity of society. For students, this new approach of education may encourage them to learn and make positive changes for the community in the future.

In conclusion, it is no doubt that computer technology has made life easier. Therefore, it is expected that the easy access to work and knowledge created by computer technology can be a contributing factor to the fast progress of the world.

Sample 3:

In today’s world, the evolution of computer technology plays a vital role in society due to its easy connectivity, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. Consequently, a growing number of individuals, both adults and juveniles, are inclined towards working and studying from the comfort of their homes. From my perspective, this trend has the potential to be a breakthrough for the progress of human life.

On one hand, it is evident that workers can benefit from this phenomenon in overcoming various job-related challenges. To be more specific, in many countries, the issue of unemployment persists on a large scale due to an imbalance between the supply of employees and job demands. The popularity of the internet has a significant impact, creating job opportunities for many individuals facing unemployment. For instance, the recent surge in Vietnamese citizens engaging in online work has made a substantial contribution to the economic growth of the country. Additionally, working from home presents an opportunity not only for individual workers but also for companies, allowing them to hire people regardless of their geographical location and save on operational costs.

On the other hand, online learning offers several benefits for teenagers. To be more precise, the demand for education always holds a crucial role in society. However, in certain places, particularly in downtown areas, people face barriers such as school fees and limited study spaces, making it challenging for them to pursue education. The advent of the internet provides an opportunity for young individuals to easily access online lessons, enabling them to study from anywhere. This development is not limited to downtown teenagers; urban students also benefit by easily acquiring knowledge and accessing advanced online courses. For example, the literacy rates among children in India have shown significant improvement as a result of studying at home.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that the internet’s development has brought about a positive shift in the lifestyle of modern people. Despite the potential drawbacks, I firmly believe that the numerous advantages stemming from computer technology contribute significantly to societal growth.

Sample 4:

In recent years, the popularity of remote work and online learning has surged, thanks to the affordability and accessibility of computer technology. From my perspective, this trend presents both advantages and disadvantages. This essay aims to delve into both sides of the issue.

On the positive side, there are substantial benefits to working and studying from home. One significant advantage is the convenience it offers. Individuals can manage their time flexibly, crafting schedules that suit their needs. Those working from home can easily juggle household chores, childcare duties, and other daily tasks. Additionally, staying at home provides a sense of security, sparing individuals from traffic congestion, road accidents, or inclement weather. Similarly, students studying at home are shielded from school-related issues like bullying. Moreover, this trend fosters stronger family bonds, as every member has more quality time together, contributing to the happiness and comfort of each individual.

Conversely, there are notable drawbacks associated with excessive screen time. Spending prolonged hours in front of digital devices can lead to sedentary lifestyles, as individuals prioritize work and study over outdoor activities like sports or picnics. Moreover, prolonged computer use can lead to eye disorders such as refractive errors. For instance, a review of 30 studies on problematic internet use among individuals working and studying from home in Vietnam found that 30 percent of participants experienced short-sightedness.

In conclusion, while the advantages of working and learning from home are undeniable, it’s crucial to acknowledge the associated disadvantages. Individuals must be mindful of these challenges and work towards finding solutions to maintain productivity and enhance overall well-being.

Sample 5:

An increasing number of people nowadays conduct their work and study from the comfort of their homes as a result of the advancements in computers. In my view, although this trend, like any other, has its drawbacks, these are largely outweighed by the associated personal and social benefits. 

To begin, there are health-related side effects associated with this change. The sedentary lifestyle of modern humans has been at the core of many health issues in the modern world, a problem this change has only aggravated. As unintentional as it may be, but traveling to work or study is a form of exercise for people, an exercise that has largely been taken away due to an increasing number of people preferring to work or study from home. However, it is equally true that, due to the saved traveling time, these people have extra time to attend to their health. The sedentary lifestyle can, thus, be considered more of a conscious choice than a condition forced by circumstances.

On the individual level, the most obvious upside has been an improved work-life balance for people who have embraced this new trend. Some of their time and energy, which would otherwise have been expended on traveling, is saved and people are able to give more time to their hobbies or families. Collectively, this change has proved beneficial for the living environment. To explain, a significant cause of rising pollution levels has been the excess number of vehicles, with daily commuters or student travelers being the prime culprit. With more people being able to study or work from home, however, the number of vehicles, and consequently, the amount of pollution has decreased. 

In conclusion, although the trend of working and studying from home does pose health risks, these can easily be overcome through individual effort. The advantages, in this case – better work-life balance and a healthier environment, make this a positive development overall.

Sample 6:

The rapid advancement of computerized technologies and the deepening division of labor have enabled an increasing number of individuals to carry out their daily tasks from the comfort of their own homes. However, whether this development is a positive or negative one for employees, employers, and society as a whole has become a pressing issue worldwide. From my perspective, I strongly believe that telecommuting can bring more benefits than drawbacks to the general public.

To begin with, telecommuting can save citizens' time, particularly for those living in remote areas far from city centers. By allowing employees to work mostly online from home, the burden of commuting and the accompanying traffic congestion can be significantly reduced. Moreover, working in a familiar environment can help employees feel more relaxed and focused, ultimately leading to improved quality and efficiency. In contrast, workers who are confined to the office often engage in various distractions to pass the time until the end of the workday. Additionally, for companies like Google and Microsoft, granting employees the option to work from home can be a wise strategy to reduce expenses on office rent and furniture, which can constitute a substantial portion of their budget.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks associated with widespread telecommuting. The most notable one is the absence of teamwork, which is crucial for the success of many projects. In today's interconnected society, both businesses and individual workers increasingly rely on collaboration, and remote employees may find it challenging to communicate and coordinate effectively with their colleagues in person. Furthermore, supervision and monitoring can present various obstacles, as it is both unethical and illegal to install surveillance cameras in employees' homes.

In conclusion, despite the challenges related to supervision and teamwork, I am convinced that embracing teleworking should be encouraged from an enlightened standpoint. The advantages of telecommuting, such as time savings, enhanced well-being, and cost reduction for businesses, outweigh the potential drawbacks. By embracing this flexible work arrangement, individuals and organizations can adapt to the changing needs of the modern world.

Sample 7:

It is true that these days thanks to the development and proliferation of computer technology, more people choose to work and study from home. In my opinion, this is a very positive trend.

This development benefits both employers and employees tremendously. With technological advances, many companies these days are able to employ the most talented people they need with no geographical limits. In addition, since they do not have to rent spacious offices or pay much money for electricity and other utilities, they can save huge amounts of money. At the same time, employees working from home can eliminate the commute time, enabling them to have more time to get more work done. Furthermore, telecommuting allows people who work far from the office to have a better work-life balance since they have more quality time with their loved ones.

Students can also derive several benefits from distance learning educational programs. A major advantage is that those who study from home can set their own pace, which can help them become more productive and prevent them from suffering from stress caused by schoolwork. Another advantage is that this option allows students to attend online courses all over the world. For example, it is now possible for students from Vietnam to enroll in online educational programs from the US with ease. Having globally recognized degrees, these students can stand a higher chance of having better career prospects.

In conclusion, because of the advancement and ubiquity of computers, more and more people favor the idea of working and studying remotely. In my view, this is an extremely positive development since it benefits employers, employees and students.

Sample 8:

In this day and age, with cheaper and more accessible computer technology, many people are opting to work and study from home. In my opinion, this is a positive development due to several reasons.

To begin with, there are a huge number of benefits for both workers and students choosing this method of work and study. Firstly, people do not need to spend time traveling to school or their workplace as they can now easily access the internet at home to complete their work. As a result, people can not only save time but also minimize the risks and costs of using transport on a daily basis to commute. On top of that, working from home gives people a chance to manage their work and leisure time more effectively. For instance, while people are required to sit in front of a computer and crunch numbers every day from nine to five, people who work from home can easily manage their schedule better to suit their needs in order to complete their work in a better state of mind.

In addition to the benefits that remote work and study brings to individuals; this trend also brings about positive outcomes for schools and businesses. In fact, schools and businesses could save a lot of money that would otherwise be allocated to the construction and maintenance of buildings and facilities. Instead, that money could be invested in enhancing other things, such as updating study programs, or other facilities that allow staff and students to work more effectively and help to build up the reputation of those institutes as well.

In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that working and studying from home is an advantageous trend as it generates many merits for all sides involved.

Sample 1:

The impact of human activities on plant and animal species has been a growing concern over the past few decades. While some argue that it is too late to reverse the damage done, I believe that effective measures can still be taken to improve the situation.

On the one hand, it is understandable why those who believe it is too late argue that the damage to the environment has already been done, and the extinction of many species is now inevitable. They believe that even if we take measures to reduce human impact on the environment, it will not be enough to save the planet from the catastrophic effects of climate change and other environmental issues. An example of this view is that reducing greenhouse gas emissions, while necessary, will not be enough to prevent catastrophic climate change. Even if we were to completely eliminate carbon emissions from human activities, it may not be enough to prevent the warming of the planet and the resulting impacts on ecosystems and human society.

On the other hand, it is not too late to take effective measures to improve the situation. Through careful planning, regulation, and education, we can reduce human impact on the environment and protect endangered species. For instance, in the 1980s, the giant panda was on the brink of extinction due to habitat loss and poaching. However, through a series of conservation efforts, the population of giant pandas has been steadily increasing. Additionally, governments, organizations, and individuals must take responsibility for their actions. For example, the Great Barrier Reef in Australia has been severely impacted by human activities such as climate change, pollution, and overfishing. However, there are organizations that have partnered with the government to support conservation efforts and raise public awareness about the importance of protecting the reef. By working together, governments, organizations, and individuals can find sustainable solutions to protect the environment and preserve biodiversity.

In conclusion, while some believe it is too late to address the negative effects of human activities on plant and animal species, I believe that effective measures can still be taken to improve the situation.

Sample 2:

It is true that a great number of flora and fauna species are adversely affected by human activities. Although some believe that it is pointless to tackle this issue as no solution will ever be effective, I argue that people can still implement viable solutions to ameliorate it.

On the one hand, the notion that there is nothing for humans to do to lessen their detrimental impact on the existence of plants and animals is sound to some extent. The main reason is that some species have become extinct even before human intervention. This is evident in how the dinosaurs were killed off by an asteroid that struck the Earth 65 million years ago, long before human beings became their own species. As well as this, plenty of endangered creatures are predicted to vanish despite the measures taken by human beings. This is because many food chains are detrimentally affected by the disappearance of certain vegetation and animals in the ecosystem, leading to a shortage of food and then the unstoppable death of other organisms.

On the other hand, opponents believe that human beings can adopt measures to ameliorate environmental issues. First and foremost, governments can enact laws to ban illegal acts that pose a threat to natural habitats. For example, the Vietnamese government introduced laws on industrial waste management in 2001, which deterred factories from discharging waste into rivers and oceans without proper treatment processes, and thus successfully improved the water quality in industrial areas to protect a significant number of aquatic creatures. Furthermore, individuals can compensate for their environmental damage. To be more specific, they can construct reserves for hunted animals or plant trees to restore deforested areas to protect the numbers of animals dying out and recover the ecosystem. As a result, numerous species can be saved in time and avoid becoming extinct.

In conclusion, although both sides have some ground reasons, I personally think that human beings should be responsible for the protection of wildlife by abiding by environmental regulations and rehabilitating nature. To that end, it would be ideal if international bodies such as the UN would encourage all people to play their part in preserving the existence of animals and plants.

Sample 3:

In recent years, environmental conservation has attracted a lot of public attention. Many people believe that humanity can no longer reverse those negative impacts on plants and animals, whereas others argue that mankind still stands a chance to improve the situation. From my perspective, though there have been numerous negative consequences, it is not too late to make a difference.

On the one hand, the serious damages which humans have caused to nature are likely to be irreversible. Firstly, it is a bitter truth that bringing extinct species back from the dead is essentially impossible. Taking advantage of natural resources found in animal habitats, humans have continually cut down trees, contaminating soil and water in order to satisfy their needs. As a consequence, the woods, rainforests and other natural areas are shrinking day by day, which in turn causes more havoc for many animal and plant species. Moreover, climate science has proved that the fight against environmental disaster is already lost. Despite people's best efforts, global temperatures still climb gradually, and extreme weather conditions have regularly hit the headlines in recent years.

On the other hand, I tend to support the idea that mankind can still take effective measures to alleviate those serious outcomes. Firstly, more and more individuals are becoming aware of the situation and adapting their lifestyles. Thanks to technological advancements, electric cars have become quite prominent these days, which significantly helps people to cut down their carbon footprint. Additionally, recycling and using environmentally friendly products is becoming a more popular trend on social media these days. Furthermore, various non-governmental organizations are raising funds and public awareness in order to prevent habitat destruction and protect endangered species. For instance, the World Wildlife Fund has attracted over 5 million global supporters and has continued to hold various projects to conserve the environment since 1961. 

In conclusion, although there are many hardships to face on this journey to conserve and protect the environment, I believe that people should not lose their hope and learn from mistakes of the past and insist on sustainable development.

Sample 4:

Considerable impacts on the environment made by human activities have been a heated debate. Some individuals are of the opinion that tackling those environmental issues is impossible. However, another school of thought opines that changes can be made to reverse the current situation. Personally, I suppose that only if urgent actions are taken, those aforementioned problems will soon be solved.

Those who advocate the lateness in improving environmental problems may point to the extinction of animals and the exceeding rate of global warming. Chief among these is that human activities, such as hunting and poaching, are the major culprit in the vanishment of a myriad of fauna and flora species. Accordingly, the ultimate adverse consequence is the imbalance in our ecosystem, which creates obstruction in the food chain. However, no feasible approach can be applied to rebirth those species. The second idea is that the substantial increase in industrial production combined with excessive deforestation has contributed to the alarming situation of global warming. And it is a bitter truth that efforts made to decrease the world average temperature once it rises will eventually become fruitless.  

Nevertheless, I still argue that fostering awareness among citizens and global cooperation will be effective measures in addressing the issue. Regarding the former, thanks to being fully aware of the detrimental impacts on the environment, a myriad of workshops or propaganda are organized to educate and encourage an environmentally-friendly living style. For example, using canvas bags instead of plastic ones in shopping has become a trend among youngsters nowadays. Another point worth mentioning is that various international law in protecting the environment has been established on the foundation of international agreement. For instance, governments have made an attempt to eradicate destructive habits and save the lives of endangered species by raising funds to protect their natural habitats.  

In conclusion, although human activities pose great risks to the environment, including the vanishment of species and the warning rate of global warming, I believe that certain methods, namely the raising of individuals’ awareness and the enhancement of cross-border corporations, can be applicable in addressing the problem.

Sample 5:

Nobody can refute the growing interest in the effects of human actions on animals and plants. While many feel that it is too late to address this issue, others reckon that several effective options are available to address the stated issue. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both views and provide my viewpoints.

Human-caused deforestation or climate change is so devastating that it endangers the lives of countless animals. As a result of habitat degradation and human hunting, many plant and animal species are becoming extinct. Some of them have already gone extinct, altering the ecosystem’s equilibrium. For example, in Vietnam, where there used to be a huge number of tigers, this animal has been killed for years to serve human demands, and just a few species remain. People believe humans cannot do anything else to cure the situation for a variety of reasons, one of which is that humans cannot cease their actions. Indeed, manufacturers operate on a regular basis and release a large amount of carbon dioxide, which raises the global temperature.

Nevertheless, I consider that there are numerous steps that governments and individuals may take to mitigate the detrimental impact of our actions on the environment. Hence, governments all across the world must get together to solve the issue of deforestation. This is because it is the primary cause of the extinction of endangered species. For example, the South African government banned deforestation in 2015, and the consequences have been astonishing, with numerous species saved from extinction and soil erosion halted. Consequently, endangered species’ habitats are no longer disrupted, and crop output has grown. Individuals can also raise awareness about the negative impact that certain of our actions have on the environment. Obviously, there are many more things we can do to address the problem.

To summarize, given the fact that many people believe that humans are powerless to conserve plants and animal species, I am certain that we can take several steps to better our environment and save a diverse range of animals.

Sample 6:

People hold different arguments about the detrimental impacts of human activities on the conditions of plants and animals. While some people believe in the futility of any countermeasures, I am convinced that there are still some solutions that can mitigate the current issue.

Admittedly, it is argued that nothing could be done to save the flora and fauna. This side of the argument is unlikely to rest on the harms already dealt with, but on the fact that almost every aspect of human life has consequences on the ecosystem. A normal human must engage in various cultural, social, and economic activities, which are impossible to completely terminate. For example, to ensure food security for 7 billion citizens on Earth, one of the common ways is to expand the cultivated land. This, in turn, encroaches on the habitats of many plants and animals.

However, from another vantage point, I believe that we could find other ways to practice those actions and reduce the damaging consequences. One feasible solution is that technological advancement could equip us with alternative solutions to many problems with little damage to the environment. For instance, the food issue could be solved by marker-assisted selection instead of expanding the farming area. This selective plant breeding method will shorten cultivating time and produce higher yields, resulting in a boosted crop productivity. Another approach to the issue lies in public education about wildlife problems, which can be made easier with the help of technology. To illustrate, in the Wildchain game, players can adopt and raise endangered animal characters digitally. In the end, users can passively learn to protect plants and animals; and the money spent on this game will be donated to international organizations that are founded to conserve endangered species.

In conclusion, although the adverse effects on plants and animals stemming from anthropogenic exploitation are unavoidable, it is not too late to reverse or ameliorate the situation by using advanced technology and raising people’s awareness.

Sample 7:

The recent years have witnessed relentless debates over the disastrous impacts of humans on the environment and whether there are still ways to remedy the situations. Some hold the belief that it is too late for any corrective measures, while others beg to differ. From my perspective, it will never be too late for anything, and therefore we can adopt viable methods to re-correct what we have done to the environment.

On the one hand, there are some irreversible environmental impacts that make some people think that any attempts to fix the current situation are futile. Humans have been exploiting myriad rainforests every year, which deprives habitats of thousands of animals. This deforestation has also led to global warming, and the implication is that the ice in the Arctic melts quickly, causing numerous deaths of animals such as the polar bear. Another example of the grave effect that humans cause to the environment can be seen in the ever-decreasing number of sea creatures like sharks or dolphins, which are on the verge of extinction due to overhunting. Taking all of these things into account, it seems to be impossible for humans to reverse the damage they cause to the environment.

I, however, side with those who believe in some curative solutions. One is that governments should impose policies and stringent fines to regulate logging activities. This method is believed to put the brakes on irresponsible tree cutting, hence tackling the issue of deforestation. Vietnam is a case in point. Companies who wish to log trees must make a commitment to plant double the number of trees they cut down. This has proven effective since the number of plants and animals residing in the forest are on the increase. Another method of no less importance is to raise people's awareness of environmental issues. Only by this would people avert their destructive behaviors on the environment, which would give us a chance to bring back the primal state of the Earth.

In conclusion, our devastating effects on this planet are undeniable, but I am of the opinion that some viable methods would be adopted to prevent further repercussions and hopefully restore the environment.

Sample 8:

Human activities have a profound effect on both plants and animals. While some individuals believe that it is too late to rectify and provide a solution, others argue that effective measures can still improve the situation. I firmly believe that, although the damage caused by human activities is significant, it is never too late to take action.

On one hand, some people assert that the damage caused to plants and animals due to human activities is irreversible. They argue that deforestation, pollution, and climate changes, driven by human actions, have led to the extinction of various species and the destruction of natural habitats. For example, the Amazon Rainforest, also known as the “Lungs of the Earth,” has been significantly depleted due to agricultural activities. This has not only caused a loss of biodiversity but has also disrupted the natural global carbon cycle.

On the other hand, proponents of proactive measures argue that it is never too late to take action. They contend that conservation efforts, sustainable practices, and technological advancements can help mitigate the negative effects caused by human activities. For example, reforestation initiatives have successfully restored damaged ecosystems and promoted biodiversity. Additionally, advancements in renewable energy have the potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Therefore, it is vital to acknowledge the way actions influence the environment and take accountability for safeguarding the planet. This can be achieved by minimizing waste and consumption and collectively working towards advocacy, policy implementation, and sustainable technology investment.

In conclusion, human activities indeed have negative impacts on plant and animal species, but it is not too late to take effective steps towards addressing the situation. It is the collective responsibility of people to ensure the preservation of the planet for future generations. Therefore, immediate action is required to mitigate the impact of human activities on the environment.

Sample 9:

It is undeniable that human activities have significantly and adversely affected a multitude of flora and fauna over an extended period. While some argue that addressing this issue is futile and no effective solution exists, I assert that the current situation can still be mitigated through the enactment of governmental laws and the establishment of individual-led reserves to safeguard existing organisms from extinction.

On the one hand, the belief that there is no effective solution to save nature is understandable. Firstly, the catastrophic impacts of human activities on ecosystems have led to the complete disappearance or critical endangerment of many species. For example, the escalating issue of deforestation has resulted in the loss of habitat for numerous plants and animals. Additionally, illegal hunting and poaching contribute significantly to the decline in the populations of various creatures. Furthermore, the negative impact on certain vegetation and animals disrupts several food chains, leading to a shortage of food for many other species. Therefore, despite human efforts to improve the situation, the extinction of some creatures seems inevitable.

On the other hand, opportunities for individuals to implement measures still exist to ameliorate environmental issues. Primarily, governmental authorities play a crucial role in restoring ecosystems by enacting strict laws and imposing punishments to deter illegal acts that threaten natural habitats. For instance, the Vietnamese government implemented regulations against deforestation and promoted afforestation in 2012, aiming to preserve and restore the habitats of many species. Additionally, citizens can make a significant contribution by establishing natural preserves in various regions to protect hunted animals and plants, thereby maintaining biodiversity. Through these efforts, numerous creatures can be saved from the brink of extinction and continue to exist.

In conclusion, while some individuals believe it is futile to tackle biological problems due to the damage caused by numerous drastic human activities, I personally think that both the government and residents can still improve the situation through the enactment of laws and the establishment of natural reserves. Moreover, it would be ideal if all people paid more attention to and raise their awareness about this issue.

Sample 10:

The impact of human activities on plant and animal breeds has raised concerns. While some argue that the situation is beyond remedy, believing it's too late to intervene, others hold the view that meaningful steps can still be taken to address this issue. This essay will delve into both perspectives and provide my personal stance on the matter.

On one hand, those who argue that the harm caused by human actions cannot be undone believe that the situation may be too far gone to fix due to disruptions in the natural balance of the environment. In other words, pollution from industries and the excessive use of chemicals can further harm the surroundings, leading to a decrease in the number of plants and creatures. Moreover, the expansion of residential areas plays a role in negatively affecting these breeds' habitats. For example, cutting down forests to build cities destroys the homes of vegetation and animals. This throws off the balance of nature, making it hard for these organisms to find suitable conditions for growth, survival, and reproduction. As a result, the possibility of making significant improvements might appear unattainable.

On the other hand, there is an alternative perspective suggesting that effective measures can still be implemented to address the issue. One potential solution is habitat restoration. Specifically, herbs and animals can have an opportunity to recover and thrive by creating protected areas or rejuvenating damaged habitats. This approach has shown positive outcomes in various cases. For example, bringing back endangered plant breeds into carefully managed environments has resulted in population recoveries. Furthermore, community participation and educational campaigns can cultivate a sense of responsibility toward these organisms. Hence, it is possible to reduce pollution, regulate the use of harmful substances, and promote sustainable practices that benefit plants, creatures, and human well-being through collective efforts.

In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I opine that adopting strategies such as habitat restoration and fostering community engagement can play a pivotal role in improving the situation for these species.

Sample 1:

Most schools globally include learning a foreign language as a compulsory component of their curriculum. However, I do not believe that students should be forced to learn a foreign language since it will unnecessarily add to the already enormous pressure students are currently facing with their schoolwork.

Admittedly, one important benefit a student can gain in learning new languages is that they can be exposed to new and diverse cultures. As language is a defining characteristic of a nation’s culture, students can acquire a deeper understanding of how the citizens of that nation typically communicate with each other and by extension how their society operates culturally. For example, by learning French, students can form an impression of the way the French conduct a typical conversation in their language. Once they are fluent in French, they can begin to understand the social fabric of the country and how the language helps to hold it together.

However, the argument that students should not be compelled to learn foreign languages is decidedly stronger. The biggest reason for this is it greatly contributes to the already significant volume of schoolwork. Since students are often subjected to a hectic teaching curriculum with mounting homework and in-class assignments, the addition of a foreign language as a core subject may make it even more difficult for students to study effectively. Recently, the Vietnamese Ministry of Education attempted to incorporate English into the national curriculum for elementary students. However, it was met with backlash from parents as they complained that their children are already burdened with a heavy workload from other subjects.

In conclusion, I would assert that students should not be compelled to learn a foreign language since it will add unnecessary pressure to the growing levels of schoolwork they are currently facing. Instead, it is advisable that schools should make it optional to learn foreign languages and students should be encouraged to do so, not made to do it against their will.

Sample 2:

There has always been a debate about whether all young students should be introduced to learning second languages because some may not have the natural aptitude for learning other languages. While learning foreign languages can enhance socialization skills, it can also lead to potential frustration. In my opinion, both viewpoints have their merits, but finding balance is more important.

On the positive side, learning a foreign language is undeniably a valuable approach to enhancing social skills. This is particularly evident as foreign language acquisition can equip individuals with the ability to communicate effectively in diverse cultural settings. In addition, it not only enhances communication but also fosters a deeper cultural understanding. This knowledge allows individuals to navigate various cultural contexts with sensitivity to a language, learners can gain insights into the customs, traditions, and values of different cultures. If children do not learn a foreign language, they might encounter challenges in enhancing their social skills. This underscores the significance of acquiring proficiency in another language.

On the flip side, the process of learning a second language may pose potential frustration for some young students. In other words, while learning languages, they may face some difficulties due to the complexities of grammar, pronunciation challenges, or the initial difficulty in grasping vocabulary. These challenges, if not addressed appropriately, can lead to a sense of discouragement and hinder the overall language-learning experience. For instance, irregular verb conjugations or intricate grammatical rules can cause confusion and impact children’s confidence in their language abilities.

It is important to strike a balance between the differing viewpoints regarding learning a second language. While it can provide an opportunity to improve social skills, it can also lead to frustration, especially for young students who lack a natural ability for language learning. In my opinion, students who struggle with language learning should not be forced to continue with it, as it may cause discouragement. Instead, schools should focus on those students who have a natural ability for language learning, as the benefits of acquiring a second language can be significant.

In conclusion, while forcing children to learn another language can provide improvements in their social skills, it is also vital to consider other ones who do not have a natural aptitude for learning a language. Therefore, I advocate for a balance between them because teaching only students who can learn a language might be more beneficial than forcing all students.

Sample 3:

One school of thought holds that some children are unable to learn a new language, so many people believe that students should not be forced to learn foreign languages. While acknowledging the reasons behind this thinking, I firmly believe that it is inefficient to acquire new knowledge that students are not required to learn.

Many people believe that nothing is impossible unless we have never tried. This means that despite not having natural abilities to learn a new language, children have to make significant efforts, take their time, and try their best for their language skills to improve gradually. Additionally, foreign languages are seen as a key to unlocking future opportunities in this new era. Considering these factors, the argument that children need to learn new languages seems reasonable.

However, I firmly believe that schools should not force students to learn a foreign language. One primary reason is that it is a waste of time to acquire new knowledge that students are not eligible to learn. Instead, schools should allow children to focus on their strengths or choose to study subjects they are passionate about. For example, children can opt for mathematics and sciences if they are not completely talented in learning a new language.

Another reason is that not all future occupations necessitate foreign languages. People might only work with individuals in their own country, and when they communicate with foreigners, they can convey their ideas through an interpreter. For instance, students who aspire to become policemen do not necessarily need to know information in other languages. Therefore, foreign languages should not be compulsory for children in preparation for their future jobs.

In conclusion, while there are valid reasons supporting the belief that learning a new language is essential in school, I firmly believe that it is unnecessary for students to learn a new language if they are not inclined to do so.

Sample 4:

Many people debate whether or not children should be required to learn a foreign language as part of their compulsory education. While the benefits of learning another language are undeniable, I completely agree that it should not be mandatory.

On the one hand, there are various reasons why it is beneficial for youngsters to learn a new language. Exposure to other languages and cultures can provide students with invaluable insights and open up opportunities for foreign education and exchange programs. In addition, there is a wealth of information available online in other languages, particularly in English, which is widely spoken all over the world.

On the other hand, learning a new language should be a privilege rather than a requirement. Research has shown that schools forcing children to learn a new language can lead to negative attitudes and a lack of motivation. Instead, language learning should be made more engaging and stimulating to encourage children to take an interest in it. Furthermore, young people are more likely to be motivated to learn a foreign language if they can see its relevance to their future careers.

In conclusion, it is clear that children should be motivated to learn a foreign language, rather than being forced to do so.

Sample 5:

There exists a divergence of opinions when it comes to the role of foreign languages in schools, with some advocating for its compulsory inclusion, while others opt for providing it as an elective. In my view, while it is challenging to formulate a curriculum for teaching a second language that caters to the diverse array of cognitive faculties in students, learning a foreign language should be prioritized, as it can enhance the academic and professional prospects of future generations.

Detractors may contend that students have varying cognitive abilities, and forcing them to learn a non-native language can impede their process of language acquisition and overall educational well-being. The primary justification behind this argument is that children inherently possess a wide range of cognitive abilities, including memory capability, attention span, and processing speed. Some may naturally excel in certain cognitive domains but struggle in others. However, compulsory education in a non-native language disregards these natural cognitive differences, potentially leading to frustration, disengagement in the classroom, and diminished self-esteem among students less proficient in linguistic studies.

While these arguments carry a degree of validity, I firmly believe that learning a foreign language can have a positive impact on academic accomplishments and the ability to respond to evolving situations. One of the major advantages for those who excel in multiple languages is heightened cognitive adaptability. Learning another language necessitates quick shifts between different linguistic structures and rules, cultivating the ability to respond to evolving situations and think outside of the box. This enhancement in problem-solving skills and adaptable mindset can have a positive impact on academic accomplishments and facilitate engagement in the global economy.

Furthermore, proficiency in multiple languages exposes students to different cultures and ways of thinking, assisting them in gaining cultural competence and facilitating participation in the global economy and international collaboration. Students who can communicate in both their mother tongue and additional languages, while also having cross-cultural awareness, can have a competitive edge in various industries, thus enhancing employability and expanding career opportunities.

In conclusion, the benefits of learning a second language outweigh its drawbacks, as it boosts cognitive abilities and prepares students to become global citizens. Concerns related to individual variations in learning can be effectively addressed by implementing differentiated instruction strategies without hindering the overall progress of the class.

Sample 6:

It is irrefutable that languages are considered a communication barrier among the native and non-native speakers and play an integral role in individual life. Institution and schools should not pressurize the students to learn non-native speech and learners’ brains are not fully developed for acquiring the concept of a foreign language. I completely disagree with the statement. I would like to explicate it at length in the paragraph to come.

The first and foremost reason is that international languages must be taught in a school for the better development of teenagers. In other words, children are nature enthusiasts and can develop an interest in a foreign language through ample possible ways like fun and games, this leading to students being more willing to interact with these languages and enhance their innovation skills and knowledge towards their studies. For instance, children already in the language acquisition stage make the learning of a foreign language easier and get familiar with the non-native speech. To add to it, at a young age, children absorb information more easily, which eventually leads to there being numerous opportunities widely available that they can easily approach without any hurdles. In addition, if schools would apply these practices to overseas dialects, it which able students to become more multilinguistic in a short time period.

Another worth mentioning reason is that international speech is quite popular in modern society with buckets of positive assets. According to them, the age of children is a good stage for developing an interest in a foreign language and becoming a polyglot. Put in other words, teenagers are cognitively more natives and are therefore able to learn more with less input. Whereas children are more active than adults, if the schools have invested in proper training, then the lesson will not be boring, and there is a strong likelihood of success. For example, researchers have shown that language learning must be taught at the age of seven for better output and to perform well in their academics in the future. In addition, the management of the schools should criticise the students who are not willing for learning different speeches, and they must add the subjects for better performance and increase their stability in studies.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down and say that, in the modern era, foreign languages are crucial for every teenager. Without an abroad speech, student life eventually becomes mundane as well as idle and deprived of international amenities in the near future. Therefore, the school must give attention to possible arrangements to make the languages easier to pronounce.

Sample 7:

Learning a foreign language is a valuable skill in today’s globalized world, and schools play a crucial role in providing this education; while some children may struggle with language acquisition, they should not be exempt from learning a foreign language. I totally disagree with the statement that schools should not force students to learn a foreign language.

Firstly, proficiency in a foreign language can indeed enhance career prospects by opening doors to international job opportunities. In today's competitive job market, employers increasingly value candidates who can communicate across cultures. For instance, a friend of mine, Maria, secured a Marketing Assistant position due to her fluency in Spanish, which enabled her to effectively manage a Latin American clientele. This example demonstrates how language skills can significantly differentiate job applicants and lead to career advancement.

Secondly, learning a new language can be daunting for many students, presenting challenges that may initially seem insurmountable, but schools should prioritize providing adequate support rather than exempting students from this crucial skill. Tailored teaching methods, additional resources, and encouragement are instrumental in helping these learners overcome their difficulties. By focusing on creating an inclusive learning environment, educators ensure that every student, regardless of initial struggles, has the opportunity to thrive in mastering a foreign language. This approach not only fosters linguistic proficiency but also cultivates a sense of achievement and inclusivity among all learners.

In conclusion, the benefits of learning a foreign language far outweigh the challenges some students may face. Schools should not shy away from mandating foreign language education, as it provides cognitive, cultural, and career advantages that are crucial for students’ personal and professional development. By supporting all students through effective teaching strategies, schools can ensure that everyone has the opportunity to reap the rewards of bilingualism.

Sample 8:

Foreign languages are one of the necessary elements to integrate into the world. However, in my considered opinion, schools should not force their students who do not have the ability to study new languages.

In the first place, if students have to study things they do not like, it will result in them not liking it still. Children who learn under pressure will not do well in the examination. Their results are probably affected as a consequence. It leads students to lose their passion, aspiration not to mention motivation in studying. Another reason is that students would have more chance to focus on primary subjects. May children who do not have new-language-ability may have some special aptitudes such as high numeracy in math, physics and biology or literacy in literature and so on. Therefore, they should spend more time on studying their favorite subject in school or developing their creativity.

Some opponents reckon that if schools force them to study new language, they can still learn it. There is much evidence which shows the results of changing the way to teach language by creating special education classes or using more pictures and interactive activities. Despite the fact that the point of view may be true, the cost of opening these special education classes is much higher than normal ones. Therefore, in order to do that, schools need to obtain sufficient funds. It seems to be impossible while the global economy is suffering from the effects of recession.

In summary, although both suggestions are provided with the aim of supporting children’s development, no-force could be better than the other in this situation. It is not necessary to force children to do what they are not good at.

Sample 9:

Some feel that since it is challenging for children to learn a foreign language, schools should not emphasize this subject area. In my opinion, the challenge is the entire justification for supporting second language education.

Critics argue that the majority of children are simply incapable of learning an additional language. The best evidence for this is anecdotal and relates to the increasingly large burden of work placed on young children. Schools in many parts of the world, particularly in high-achieving nations such as South Korea and Japan, are in session for many hours and students learn an array of subjects. They are usually taught English, the world’s lingua franca, and this is especially difficult for speakers of Asian languages, where there is little shared linguistic history. The end result is often that students waste time and may feel discouraged and lack self-esteem.

However, children can learn languages better than adults and the challenge presented is itself an important lesson. If the schools have invested in proper training and use engaging materials, then the lessons will not be boring and there is a stronger likelihood of success. Research has shown that language learning is most effective before the age of 7, with pronunciation becoming a stumbling block for older learners who already have fixed vocal formations. Moreover, the difficulty of learning a language encourages children to work harder and expand their ability to learn in creative ways. This applies to all subjects, but languages stand out as students must seek novel memorization techniques and view the world from a completely different perspective.

In conclusion, despite the low rates of success in many cases, the impact of attempting to learn a language is itself tremendously beneficial. Schools should therefore continue funding this part of the curriculum.

Sample 10:

It is true that learning a foreign language is required in some schools. While some students may find it challenging, I totally believe that this is a discipline that all children should learn, which would be discussed objectively during the course of the essay.

To begin with, language helps to break down obstacles to communication. Because international travel is becoming a common occurrence in many people’s lives, it is necessary to engage with others when traveling for business or pleasure. Asking directions, for example, will almost certainly necessitate a rudimentary understanding of the country’s language. School is a good setting for learning a new language because children learn faster than adults. As a result, students should be required to acquire a decent command of a second, or even third, language during their school years.

Second, communication encompasses the formation of friendships. Taking up a language in school should include the opportunity to organize exchange visits between students of various nationalities or create chat rooms amongst language students utilizing social networking sites. Students will be placed into real-life circumstances where they will have to rely on their linguistic abilities to converse with a student from another country who speaks a different language, using cutting-edge technology. This serves as a motivator to overcome language hurdles and improve one’s ability to communicate smoothly. While the school curriculum already has a lot on its plate, time should be set out to learn a foreign language.

Finally, the school years provide a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to acquire a new language, and foreign languages should be a mandated part of the school curriculum.

Sample 1:

In many countries, the proportion of the younger generation is increasing more and more than the older age–group. I believe there are more advantages to this than its drawbacks and my views regarding this are discussed below.

To begin, as the young generation is surging, employment in the work which requires strength would increase, which would automatically enlarge the advancement of a particular country. Furthermore, the young generation has a creative mind and more high-yielding than the older generation which will ultimately help in the development of the industry and bring out innovative creations to the world. For example, in developed nations like Australia, Canada, etc., employees are in their late 25s only so they can work for the company for more than two decades over there and are able to give a great advantage to the respective nation.

On the other hand, as there would be more youngsters, then the competition among them would increase and will ultimately cause unemployment for the deserved candidate and it may change his mind and he can do bad things in his life. Besides this, as the population of the old generation is diminishing, the rituals of the family and country will not be followed, and the tradition of a particular country will be forgotten by the new generation.

To conclude, although the development of the country and creativity in the country will increase by the newcomers the disadvantages would also be there it as in, the competition among the new jobs will increase and also the new generation will not follow the old tradition which is followed by their ancestors. 

Sample 2:

Currently, there are more youngsters in the whole world than elderly people. I reckon that there are more drawbacks of this ongoing thing than its benefits, as the awareness that the old generation has will not be complemented by the new generation.

Scrutinizing the disadvantages first, in countries like India, the old generations are contemplated as the idol of the family and the accomplishment provided by the old generation of the family is indispensable for the new generation also, they give knowledge of the world. In addition to that, elders have more experience, perception, talents, and prior knowledge on the subject. For example, the old worker who has been employed by one company for 10 years will definitely have a better recommendation about the problem than the newcomers by his experience and knowledge of the instruments used in that situation.

Coming to the advantages, having more young people is also advantageous as they would be able to work more than old workers due to their more physical strength and fresh mind regarding the workplace. Furthermore, the foreign industries would invest and make their network in a country where the younger population is more as they would get more young employees from that country which will indirectly be beneficial for the nation as the foreign exchange would have surged and the GDP of the country will also increase.

In conclusion, although the foreign companies will invest in a country where younger people are more but, the experience which is there with the old people cannot be matched.

Sample 3:

In many countries, the old generations are diminishing as compared to the new generations. This has related advantages in many areas, and I personally think there will be fewer disadvantages.

Coming to advantages first, the younger generation will have more knowledge of the new machinery used in the world as they are taught about that technology in college and may be able to familiarize themselves with the new technology more efficiently and faster than the old generation. For instance, if a worker who is working in an institution where new technology is introduced then he would face difficulty in memorizing its function, but the new employees would be able to work more efficiently as he would have knowledge of it. A large number of young people means that the country has a large number of human resources, which can help in the economic development of a country. As a result, governments can collect large amounts of taxes, which can be used for the country's infrastructure and will also increase tourist attraction from other countries.

Coming to disadvantages, as the young generation will be more the strain on the education system will be more and more which will result in decrease in quality education in the countries. As the burden on the schools will increase, they will not be able to give their personal attention to every child in the school. 

To conclude, as knowledge of the new instruments would be there in the younger generation than elderly people, they would be able to make more contribution to the nation but, burden on the education system would also increase.

Sample 4:

In recent times, some countries have seen a significant increase in the number of young adults in their population, while the number of older people remains relatively low. This demographic situation has led to debates on whether the advantages of having a predominantly young population outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will assess both the pros and cons of this situation and conclude that having a large proportion of youths has more advantages than demerits.

One advantage of having a large population of young adults is the potential for economic growth. Young adults are typically more productive and innovative and are more likely to start businesses that can contribute to economic growth. Additionally, a large pool of young workers can help offset the financial burden of providing healthcare and pensions for an ageing population. For example, countries like India and China have a significant young population, which has contributed to their rapid economic growth in recent years.

A high population of young adults can also have negative consequences. One of the main disadvantages is the potential for high unemployment rates, particularly if there is not enough demand for labour. This can lead to social unrest and political instability. Additionally, a young population can also lead to a lack of experienced workers, which can create skill shortages in certain industries, such as healthcare and education.

Despite the potential disadvantages, I believe that the advantages of having a relatively large number of young adults in a population outweigh the disadvantages. The economic benefits of a young population are too significant to ignore, particularly in developing countries that are trying to achieve rapid economic growth.

In conclusion, while having a large population of young adults has both advantages and disadvantages, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Governments should focus on developing policies and programs to maximize the potential economic benefits of a young population while mitigating the potential negative consequences.

Sample 5:

Youths in some nations, including some Asian, African and Western countries, comprise the highest percentage of the total population. Having a larger proportion of youth is considered to have many advantages as well as demerits for a country. I personally believe that a country reaps more benefits from its active and young workforce.

Having a large proportion of young adults and a relatively low percentage of seniors may lead to a disbalance in the demography of a nation and bring some negative consequences. Unemployment could be one such significant negative outcome which can lead to increasing crime rates, social unrest and political instability. Moreover, elderly people have vast experience and wisdom that are vital for many important state positions. With their diminishing numbers, the nation may struggle to find suitable elderly to fill those positions. For instance, elderly politicians, writers, researchers and doctors have more to contribute to society than their younger counterparts.

On the other hand, the young generation is dynamic, and energetic, and can contribute to the job sector which has a huge positive impact on the economic development of the country. They come up with fresh ideas and are free from old dogma. It gives them a competitive advantage in bringing innovations. It is undeniable that the educated young generation is the best resource a country can have, and their contribution to the country is significantly higher than the participation of children and elderly people. For instance, technological development is mostly driven by youths and many countries reap the benefits of technological advancements from their relatively higher younger populations.

To conclude, older people should not be considered a burden for the country; however, the young have more to contribute to society and the country as a whole. This is why it is more beneficial for a country to have an active and innovative workforce than dependent senior citizens.

Sample 6:

The demographic makeup of many countries at present reflects a larger proportion of young adults in comparison to the number of older individuals. There is ongoing debate regarding whether the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide relevant examples to support the arguments.

On the one hand, the prevalence of a youthful population offers several advantages. Firstly, young adults are often characterized by their ambition and motivation. These qualities can be harnessed to drive progress and innovation within a society. For instance, many successful entrepreneurs and industry leaders are young adults who have exhibited exceptional drive and determination in pursuing their goals. Furthermore, the physical vigor and mental resilience commonly associated with youth can contribute to the overall strength and vitality of a nation. This is exemplified by the significant role played by young soldiers in defending and safeguarding the security of a country.

Conversely, it is essential to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of an imbalanced age distribution within a population. Young adults are frequently perceived as being impulsive and imprudent, traits which can hinder the stability and development of a society. In contrast, older individuals are often characterized by their wisdom, prudence, and composure, qualities that are indispensable for guiding and mentoring the younger generation. The absence of such mentorship and guidance could impede the societal progress and growth.

In conclusion, while the larger population of young adults brings with it advantages such as ambition and physical resilience, the absence of older individuals with their wisdom and experience could pose potential challenges for society. It is imperative for nations to strike a balance in their age demographics to ensure the nurturing of a well-rounded and prosperous community.

Sample 7:

Today, in some countries, young adults account for a comparatively large proportion of the population compared with older people. I believe the upsides of this situation far outweigh its downsides because young people are the main drivers of economic growth.

One disadvantage of having large numbers of young people may be that it can lead to high unemployment among them. Most older people already have their careers figured out. They either

have stable corporate jobs or run their own businesses. In comparison, many young adults, especially those who just graduated from university, are still looking for jobs. When there are too many of them competing for the same positions, their chances of securing one can be very low. However, I do not think this is a major disadvantage for young people as long as they make the leap to self-employment.

On the positive side, young people are the driving force of an economy. This is because they tend to be more productive and creative than older people and thus are more likely to bring change and innovation to their countries. Take for example the highly innovative trillion-dollar U.S. tech industry. Most employees in this industry are only in their late 20s. I think this creates a great advantage for a country because a strong economy offers people high standards of living.

In conclusion, although large numbers of young adults can mean high jobless rates among them, I believe this disadvantage is greatly outweighed by the advantage that they can drive an economy to grow.

Sample 8:

The average life expectancy rate has come down drastically in many countries. It is 70 in Asia and 79 in countries like the USA and Europe. So there are few older people in the world. The young population is comparatively higher. Some are of the opinion that a country can progress with this disproportionate rate of population while others argue that we need older people in equal numbers. I think that having a larger ratio of young people will definitely be advantageous. 

Young people are doers. They are capable of accomplishing a given task and their productivity levels are unmatched. They are also at less risk of developing health complications. So a nation composed of healthy, actively contributing young people is sure to progress in all spheres. Young people are quick to learn and easily adapt to changing environments. They are also the resource base with which a country can attract business opportunities that are pivotal for economic growth and development. They think out of the box and don’t cling to old ideas. If properly educated and utilised, they are an asset to the nation.

As every coin has two sides, this population variation has downsides too. Young people tend to act fast. Older people think twice before they attempt to do something. Out of experience, they are wiser. Young people are prone to misuse. If not properly managed, they can ruin a nation’s progress. Having a larger proportion of young people means that more people are in the working age bracket. So, the country will be pressured to create adequate job opportunities failing which their youth may tread in unwanted paths and cause harm.

In summary, having a larger proportion of youth is undoubtedly a boon. Given proper direction, they can create wonders. It is up to the country to utilize their youth to the maximum potential in order to reap benefits. 

Sample 9:

In numerous nations today, a demographic tilt towards a younger population is observable, as opposed to a more aged demographic. This phenomenon, while presenting unique challenges, predominantly heralds a plethora of opportunities that, in my view, surpass the associated drawbacks. The crux of this essay will delve into the dynamism and innovation brought forth by a youthful populace and the potential strains on societal infrastructure, before affirming the overall advantage of such a demographic composition.

Primarily, a youthful demographic infuses a nation with vibrancy and innovation, serving as the bedrock of a thriving, forward-looking society. Young adults, being at the zenith of their creative prowess, drive technological advancements and foster entrepreneurial ventures that are crucial for economic diversification. For instance, Silicon Valley's tech boom, a testament to the ingenuity and ambition of its young, dynamic workforce, has not only created myriad employment opportunities but also propelled the United States to the forefront of the global digital economy. This demographic's propensity for risk-taking, coupled with an unparalleled adaptability, underpins a culture of continuous improvement and economic expansion, laying a robust foundation for future prosperity and setting a benchmark for global innovation trends.

Conversely, the preponderance of young adults can exert pressure on educational and employment infrastructures, potentially leading to heightened competition for resources and job opportunities, thus presenting a complex challenge for policy planners and educators alike. However, this challenge is mitigated by the inherent capacity of a youthful society to adapt and evolve, making it an engine for societal transformation. Proactive investment in education and skill development, meticulously tailored to the emerging demands of the global market, can transform these potential drawbacks into opportunities. By doing so, it ensures that the workforce remains competitive and versatile, while also innovatively meeting societal needs, thereby crafting a resilient economic landscape that is prepared to navigate the uncertainties of the future.

In conclusion, the demographic shift towards a younger population undoubtedly poses challenges, yet the overarching benefits—stemming from innovation and economic vitality—far exceed these issues. Young adults' capacity for driving change and adapting ensures not only immediate advantages but also a resilient and flourishing future for their communities.

Sample 10:

Today's demographic landscape in several countries showcases a notable tilt towards a younger populace, juxtaposed with fewer older individuals. This shift, albeit fraught with challenges, primarily augurs well for societal progress and innovation, far outweighing any potential disadvantages. The essence of this discourse will revolve around the vitality and fresh perspectives young adults contribute to societal development, and the consequent demands placed on infrastructural resources, ultimately underscoring the demographic shift's overall positive impact.

The infusion of young adults into the societal fabric injects a dynamic force of creativity and adaptability, pivotal for driving technological advancements and spearheading novel entrepreneurial endeavors. For example, the vibrant startup ecosystem in Bangalore, often hailed as India's Silicon Valley, thrives on the ingenuity and resilience of its youthful population. These young minds not only challenge the status quo but also lay the groundwork for a future replete with groundbreaking innovations, thereby catalyzing economic growth and enhancing global competitiveness. Their enthusiasm and willingness to embrace change serve as a catalyst for societal transformation, paving the way for advancements that span across various sectors, from technology to sustainable development.

However, this demographic trend also strains existing educational and employment systems, as the surge in young adults vies for limited opportunities and resources. Yet, such challenges prompt the reevaluation and strengthening of these very systems, encouraging investments in education and vocational training that are aligned with the evolving job market. By fostering a culture of lifelong learning and adaptability, societies can better equip their youth to navigate future uncertainties, turning potential challenges into stepping stones for progress.

In summation, the increasing prevalence of a youthful demographic offers a promising avenue for societal advancement through innovation and adaptability, significantly outweighing the logistical challenges it presents. This demographic pivot not only enriches the societal tapestry with fresh ideas and energy but also ensures a resilient and prosperous future through the continuous evolution of its people and systems.

Sample 11:

Nowadays, some countries’ young adult population is way higher than that of elderly people. Though it comes at the cost of cultural preservation as the older people are more concerned about the heritage and identity, a country with a larger share of young people definitely enjoys advantages in terms of robust workforce and modern economic development.

Young people are engines of a national economic development. This age group consists of the main workforce, and they are more adaptable to the ever-changing science and technological innovation that results in economic opportunities. In fact, young minds are more confident to take risks on undertaking daunting tasks, and eventually they are the ones who are coming up with global leading entrepreneurships that generate massive employments and economic growth for their countries. For instance, SpaceX, Tesla, Facebook etc. revolutionary companies were launched by young energetic people, and they have been contributing incredibly to their countries’ economic development.

However, a lower share of aged population could risk a country’s cultural and identical heritages, because old people are more aware of these issues. Senior people passionately tend to pass their ethnical and lingual uniqueness to the next generations. In fact, cultural individuality is one of the key features of a country’s standout presentation in the global arena, and if there is a significantly lower number of old people, this feature might face the threat of extinction.

In conclusion, though the older citizens are more aware of practicing and passing the cultural identity to the next generations, the young people are at the heart of overall economic development because they are more talented in terms of undertaking dynamic challenges and harnessing diverse economic opportunities.

Sample 12:

Nowadays, in some nations there is a large young population compared with that one formed by older people. There are both benefits and drawbacks to this situation because, even though a great number of young people in a country can boost its economy, this comes at the cost of people’s wise attitude and of overall security.

It is undeniable that a great number of young people can boost a country’s economy by a reduction of its national debt, and by more people involved in active jobs. In fact, the pension scheme is considered the most important cause of the steep rise of the national debt of those nations in which there is a large number of old individuals, due to monthly payments made by government to retired people. In addition, a younger population, engaging in many jobs, such as manufacturing, services and any kind of intellectual work, can really let a country thrive, due to a stronger economy, and to more scientific progress.

On the contrary, a large young population can affect society, due to a less wise approach to adversities, and to an increased crime rate. This is especially true if we consider that when we are older, we develop more empathy, becoming more compassionate in general. Moreover, impatience, typical of young age, can have a detrimental impact on society because it can lead to lack of capacity to tackle difficulties, such as economic adversities, causing in some cases riots too. In addition, especially in these hurdles, there is also a crime rate surge, which can really endanger the life of many people. Furthermore, an increased number of crimes can seriously damage the economy of a country and cause a decline of jobs available.

In conclusion, although it comes at the cost of smooth social interaction and safety, a large young population can boost economic and scientific progress. Weighing in all the options, I think that a great number of young people can really let a country flourish.

Sample 1:

As an educator with years of experience, I strongly disagree with the idea that schools should cut art and music out of the curriculum in favor of focusing solely on subjects like information technology. While it is important for children to be prepared for the modern world, a well-rounded education that includes the arts is crucial for their overall development.

Art and music play a vital role in fostering creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence in children. These skills are just as important in the modern world as technical skills. In fact, many employers are now recognizing the value of hiring individuals with a strong foundation in the arts, as they bring unique perspectives and problem-solving abilities to the table.

Furthermore, art and music provide an avenue for self-expression and can be a source of joy and inspiration for children. By cutting these subjects from the curriculum, we risk depriving students of the opportunity to explore and develop their talents in these areas, which are essential for their personal growth and well-being.

While it is undeniable that information technology is an important field in the modern world, it should not come at the expense of the arts. A balanced education that includes a variety of subjects will better prepare children for the future, as it equips them with a diverse set of skills and knowledge that will serve them well in any career path they choose to pursue.

In conclusion, I believe that cutting art and music from the curriculum in favor of focusing solely on information technology is a shortsighted approach to education. A well-rounded education that includes the arts is essential for children to thrive in the modern world.

Sample 2:

It is generally argued that innovative subjects like IT technology and robot technology should be added to the school curriculum instead of arts, music and choreography. However, these subjects play a crucial role in forming pupils' brain development and imagination as well as calming them down.

Admittedly, every subject is much more important for children's lifestyles, including music and art. In fact, music is something that can console everyone in any situation and help individuals to concentrate as well as overcome depression or stress. For instance, in ancient Sparta, boys were taught music and poetry so that they could obtain the motivation to defend their country and relax after wars. That is why nowadays, there is a special song in the army of every country. When it comes to art, if pupils learn how to draw and paint pictures, they will broaden their minds as well as enhance their creativity and imagination. As an example of this view, Leonardo DaVinci invented the first aeroplane scheme by drawing its structure.

Nevertheless, in our contemporary world, there has been a great demand for hi-tech over the past few decades. Therefore, most teenagers prefer attending IT courses rather than recreational subjects. For this reason, most schools are applying such courses in developing countries. In Japan, for example, every school leaver has to create something new like a robot or software before finishing school. Otherwise, they cannot get their qualifications and attestations. In our country, information technology is also developing rapidly day by day and promotes teaching this subject as an academic value.

In conclusion, considering both these views, I strongly believe that arts and music should be conducted with the help of computer technology in schools.

Sample 3:

Many individuals think that the aim of education should be preparing children for the modern world. Thus, music and art should be removed from the curriculum in order to focus on more beneficial subjects such as information technology. In my opinion, art and music are equally important as other subjects in the modern world, which is why they should be in the curriculum. The aim of this essay is to disagree with the argument, and it will explain the debate by using examples.

To begin with, it is important to bear in mind that art and music has a unique place throughout history. By learning forms of art, students would have a chance to express their thoughts and feelings better. Furthermore, the ability of lateral thinking can be increased by learning arts and students would have the potential for combining the upward trends such as mobile application and the internet with art. For example, there are many applications that include music and the power of technology together. Consequently, music and arts should not be seen as outmoded and included in the curriculum.

Secondly, cutting art and music out of the curriculum can cause a loss of the behemoth potential of students. It is noticeable that every child has unique skills and ability. Therefore, especially in fundamental education, many different subjects should be taught to children. In this way, students can discover their personal interests and it gives a clearer vision of the modern world. Instead of teaching a particular subject, comprehensive education in different areas, including art and music, would be more beneficial in order to prepare children for the industrial and technological age.

To summarize, although some individuals believe that art and music should be cut out of the curriculum in the school, this essay demonstrated that the current technological development might be combined with art and as a second argument education should be well-rounded in a different subject for better preparation. For this reason, there is no doubt that art and music should be included in the curriculum.

Sample 4:

Nowadays, we cannot deny that education is the most important thing for children. Education has a duty to prepare children to live in the modern world with happiness. There are many subjects that were taught in school. Some people believe that school should focus on subjects such as information technology and deduct art and music. In my view, I strongly disagree with this statement.

There are many reasons that art and music are still important currently. Firstly, both subjects can release you from extension situation. Secondly, these subjects make you feel relaxed and fulfil your energy when you feel bored. For example, when children are bored doing homework, they can enjoy by singing a song. Finally, art and music make you feel calm. After that, it is easier to create new ideas after you listen to music or see some pictures.

Nevertheless, some people argue that art and music were antique subjects which is not necessary for recent days. Hence, students should not learn it because it wastes time. Moreover, students should study information technology instead of art and music since it will be more crucial in the future world. The main reason is in modern society, we always use IT for finding every information. For instance, we are serving the internet for finding new worldwide information.

In conclusion, every subject is valuable in itself. So, we should not ignore each area. No one knows what will happen in the future, maybe one day you will need to use this knowledge.

Sample 5:

Many people think that students need to concentrate on practical subjects such as information technology to prepare for a modern world. Therefore, schools should put more stress on these subjects and remove art and music out of the syllabus. While I agree that practical subjects should be emphasized, I believe art and music still play an important role.

On the one hand, I agree that practical subjects need to be focused on because they prepare students for their future career. For instance, information technology is the basis for many jobs in the modern world such as accountant or office worker. Some other jobs in economics and related fields also require maths, physics and certain theoretical subjects. Without the knowledge of these subjects, it will be difficult for students to work efficiently in their jobs.

On the other hand, I would argue that although students don’t need art and music in their future career, these subjects still have certain benefits as they can bring happiness to one’s life. For instance, studies have shown that classical music can make people feel more relaxed and avoid negative feelings. Another case is that creating art like drawing or painting a picture can give you an absolutely rewarding and a sense of happiness. That’s why arts are also important and should not be ignored.

In conclusion, while I agree that it is good to help children to focus on theoretical subjects, arts should not be cut out of the syllabus since they can make people happy and satisfied.

 

Sample 1:

A visible change of any living organism is getting older. Child, youth, adult and elderly are some of the stages in our life. Child and elderly stages are dependent stages compared to other two stages. For both of these situations, a human being needs other’s support.     

While we were children, our parents were there for our supportive role. When the parents became older, definitely their children need to be the supportive role for their parents. This is the role we carry among human beings vice versa. If the parents live with their children only parents will feel safer, attached to family and sharing of love. Unfortunately, many of them attend to works, they do not have time to look after their children neither their parents. In this case, elders could be sent to some a common place where other elders are staying. But payment cannot be made by the government.  

Since it is the responsibility of their family, definitely family needs to pay for caring of their parents. They may not have enough time to take care of their parents. Since the government has employed special people for that, at least those elders’ parents need to be paid by their family.    

For example, many of the parents were private sector employees and they did not have a monthly pension scheme. But they have only Employee provident fund and employee trust funds. It has been used by the children of the parents in plantation sector of Sri Lanka. Finally, children will neither look after their parents nor elderly parents do not have own money in hand. That is, all advantages utilised from elders. When they become a stage of the dependent, families are trying to escape from their responsibilities. This is a kind of selfish. Paid by the government should be stopped and families should be paid for them.

Especially the children are responsible for looking after the parents; they should definitely pay for the parents and not the government.

Sample 2:

At present, most of the elderly population are left in the care of home-cares due to the fact that the younger family members are too busy with their work and could not provide sufficient care and attention for the later. In addition, some of the family members even fail to provide financial support. Hence, the government has left no choice but to pay for their care. Some people believe financial responsibility should be given to the family; however, I strongly believe that the government should take greater responsibility. This argument is supported by stating some of the reasons why I agree.

First and foremost, there are variations in each family's financial capabilities. Some can provide sufficient support for the elderly, while some fail to do so. This instability is risky, therefore the government, which has sufficient resources could somehow assist them instead. For instance, a family member may have no job when an elderly needs hospitalisation. In this case, giving responsibility to the government will be an advantage.

Moreover, a majority of the elderly had been productive during their earlier life. Some of them have paid insurances, government fees and taxes. These contributions had been helpful in establishing the government. Hence, in return, the government should help them, now that they already are debilitated. For example, as an intake coordinator for insurances, I am aware that in the United States, productive citizens, who work in a company are paying monthly contributions for their Medicare insurances. When the time comes that these citizens became old and sick, the government is mandated to support their needs.

In summary, financial support for elderly citizens should be a responsibility for both the family and the government. However, because the government is more stable, they should take greater responsibility.

Sample 3:

The concept of old homes is very prevalent in modern societies. However, this trend has dramatically increased in some developing and developed countries over the last few years. Senior citizens prefer to live in those homes because of better interaction and care facilities. Some people argue that the state is responsible for looking after their people and should spend money on their care. Others claim that expenses should be borne by family in response to hard work and effort for providing health, education and other amenities of life to their family members. I believe that it is a mutual duty of family and government to support them financially.

Family plays a substantial role in providing comfort to their elders; therefore, effort of senior citizens should be acknowledged as they have spent all their lives for the upbringing and taking care of children health, education and other necessities of life. During the old age of their parents, it is a primary obligation of the family members not to deprive them of their basic financial needs.

On the other hand, senior citizens had served their entire life while serving in both public and private sector for the betterment of the country. They have deposited chucks of money in government funds in term of taxes throughout their services, this makes them eligible for the help of the government in a time of need.

To sum up, I would like to say that the government should take necessary measures for making comfort and ease in senior people lives. Their health-related issues should be urgently solved while not taking even a single penny from them. Moreover, the family is also responsible for their elders need and must put their maximum efforts to make them happy during their last days.

Sample 4:

One of the most challenging and controversial questions of today’s society is that who should be responsible for old people’s care and expenses: either it should be the government or the family members. In my opinion, it should be a mutual responsibility of both the government and the family.

To start with, parents play the most important and strong part in a child’s life. They give them values, manners, love and care. They provide them with support morally as well as financially. They try their best to give their child the ideal life they could imagine.

So, when these parents get old and need help and support in almost every manner, then children should not run from their duties. They should take care of their parents as good as their parents did when they were young.

On the other hand, all the families don’t have the same structures. Some might have problems such as financial or accommodation. Then at this point, I believe that the government should come forward and take steps to make senior citizens’ lives better. The people who are now old have paid the tax in their whole life and that’s why the government should take their financial responsibilities as well. Old citizens should have equal rights on government funds as they have served and paid taxes which help the government to run the state. I strongly claim that the government should have a fixed fund or deposit for individuals and as well as for old homes.

In addition, I like the idea of the security deposit as for example, an old person can live with his family without being a burden on them. Finally, in my opinion, both the government and the family should take possible responsibility to make senior citizens happy and give them a comfortable life.

Sample 5:

Every human being, towards the latter stages of his life, starts becoming a child who needs our attention for survival. In Britain, there’s a system which allows elderly people to live with people of their age, aided by nurses and staff members assigned to take care of them. This essay will elucidate why the young ones should take care of their elders.

To begin with, the now-old people once nurtured and molded us into the people we’ve become. They were there as an integral support for us. A similar thing is expected of us when they grow old and need someone to fall back on. But, due to their work-related commitments, the young ones aren’t fully able to heed their attention to their ageing parents. Hence, they persuade them to live in old-age homes. For a family that chooses this pronouncement, they should be the ones who pay for this care.

It is often seen that the young ones make as many efforts as humanly possible to tend to their elders but can’t. So, to spare them off of their busy schedules, parents often consider moving to a retirement home. In either sense, the family should provide for the elderly, either in taking care of them personally or endow them with paid care in an old-age home.

The government should provide more retirement benefits, along with setting up such homes so that every elder gets the care he deserves. But one should keep in mind that the final choice remains with the family, and hence it should be them who need to pay for this care. The government could support them to uplift some financial burden.

To conclude, we as a society should encourage everyone to take care of their parents and elders because they deserve the warmth, love and respect of their young ones. But, if at all they live in an old-age home, it should be the family that has to pay for their care.

Sample 6:

Unequivocally, every human being, as they age, begins to resemble a child who requires attention to survive. As a result, the concept of nursing homes is prevalent in today’s contemporary society. Most senior citizens prefer to live in those homes owing to better interaction and facilities. Some people opine that the government has a responsibility to pay for elderly care. Others argue that expenses should be borne by the family members. In my opinion, the onus is on the government to look after the senior citizens and support them financially.

To begin with, it is crucial for the government to look after its senior citizens as a token of gratitude due to the fact that the majority of the older adults have contributed to the country’s advancement and development by working for the government in different sectors. These senior citizens had devoted their entire lives to this cause. They had deposited chunks of money in government funds in the form of taxes throughout their working services, making them eligible for government assistance in times of need. These people have already paid enough taxes to the state government. So, the government can try to pay back the money as monthly pensions to the senior citizens.

Further, the government should implement appropriate laws and pass bills that will provide financial assistance to senior citizens who are unable to pay their medical expenses. For instance, the Indian government has introduced different schemes which aid elderly people with their medical expenses. In addition, the government can establish exclusive senior citizen homes, well-equipped with the latest amenities at a reasonable cost for all the elderly. Thus, it’s the government’s bound obligation to take care of their retired population by covering their medical and nursing care expenditures.

Although the family can look after their elderly parents by covering their basic medical expenses, it’s the government’s responsibility to take care of the expensive medical treatments of the elderly by offering concessions.

To sum up, elderly individuals require assistance and nursing care. In my opinion, the government is stable enough to support its senior citizens financially, and it is the government’s responsibility to look after the elderly medical expenditure and nursing care.

Sample 7:

Many old people in Britain, after a lifetime of hard work and the toil of bringing up children, are put into homes for the elderly by their families. There, they are looked after by professional nurses, and this is sometimes at the expense of the government. However, this situation has raised controversy about whether we extend to our elders the care and respect they deserve.

The critics of this system say that it is the duty of the family to look after its senior members in the years when they are no longer able to work. They point out that in retirement homes old people tend to feel useless and unwanted by their family members, who seldom come to see them. In addition, there is evidence that younger people benefit from the experience and wisdom of older people who live with them on a daily basis.

On the other hand, those who support the system say that retired parents can be a burden to young families. Not only is it expensive to support old people who have little or no income, but the fact that old people are often ill and need a great deal of looking after can be too much for their busy children.

In my opinion, neither side is completely right. Old people in good health and with enough finances to support themselves can be a great help to their children. For instance, they can look after their grandchildren while the children are out at work. On the other hand, sick and penniless old people are better off being looked after in retirement homes at government expense.

Sample 8:

In recent years, the number of people who live in nursing homes in England, Wales and Scotland has been increasing. Some people believe that the family should pay for the care of nursing homes. However, I argue that the government should take responsibility for the cost. The first reason is that some people are too old to pay for the care of other family members and the second reason is that some families cannot afford to pay for the care.

The government should pay for the cost of nursing homes because some family members are also too old to pay for the cost of care. Some countries have an aging population due to healthier lifestyles and the advanced state of medical technology. Take Japanese society as an example; it is predicted that one-third of the population in 20 years will be over 65 years. This means that 70-year-old people might have to pay for the care of their elderly parents in the future. I therefore believe that taxpayer money should pay for elderly care.

The second reason is that the financial situation varies depending on the family. In the case that families cannot afford to pay for the cost, they have to take care of their elderly loved ones. While some people think it is natural to take care of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other people find it very difficult. It is not uncommon that family members use financial, physical, and psychological abuse on their elderly parents because of the stress from taking care of them. For example, there was an increase in the number of cases of euthanasia in countries where this is legal during the recent global economic recession.

In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea that the state should pay for the care of the aged because some family members are too old to pay for them and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. Therefore, the government should establish their pension system for the care of elderly citizens.

Sample 9:

Determining who should bear the expenses for elderly care is a challenging issue for governments and societies worldwide. In Britain, the government is obligated to fund nurses and accommodations for the elderly. However, there are arguments suggesting that the responsibility should rest with the families of the elderly.

Elderly individuals, who were once part of the working class, are those who have contributed to society and the economy. Having already contributed through taxes, social welfare, and other state expenses for decades, it is understandable that the country’s leaders must fulfill their obligation to care for them. It is imperative for the public to ensure that individuals have their basic needs met upon retirement or when they are no longer able to work due to age. This support can manifest as free access to elderly homes, regular healthcare packages, or direct financial assistance. For instance, in Vietnam, upon reaching retirement age, individuals become eligible for a monthly government payment and a card for free healthcare at most public sector hospitals. The amount of the payout varies depending on the individual’s contributions to public social insurance throughout their working years.

It is worth noting that elderly individuals do not always require the same level of care. As individuals age, they may be exposed to inevitable health risks. For example, a chronic illness may suddenly develop, necessitating expensive medical treatments abroad. Therefore, not all governments have sufficient funds to cover exceptional cases. In such situations, the elderly person’s family needs to care for them and bear the medical expenses.

Conversely, younger family members should honor their parents and grandparents, as the elderly need more than just a place to spend their final stage of life. They deserve respect and care from their families, especially considering their contributions to society.

In conclusion, governments have a responsibility to care for older people due to their past contributions to the country. However, families also play a crucial role in providing support and care for their elderly members, ensuring they have a dignified and comfortable life in their later years.

Sample 10:

As a part of the population in a country grows older, the issue of who should take care of the old population has been up for debate. Some believe that the family should take care of the old people while others believe that the government should take responsibility for their old citizens. I believe that the government and the family both have equal responsibility towards the aged population and instead of looking at the moral issues, we need to focus on what is better for them.

There are many families who are willing but are unable to look after their old parents and relatives due to certain factors such as a poor financial situation. On the other hand, we have some families who are capable but are just unwilling to look after their old ones due to various reason such as ideological differences etc. In both of those cases, I think it's better for the government to take responsibility and look after the aged family members since the whole issue is how can we make sure those individuals live their remaining life comfortably. Forcing the families that just can't or aren't willing to look after their old members will only make the situation worse for the people we're trying to help.

On the other hand, we have lots of families which are both capable and are more than happy to look after their loved ones once they grow older. Well in those cases, the solution is quite clear and there seems to be no reason for the government to interfere.

All in all, I think that the issue of who should look after the old population depends on those factors listed above and our policy must act in the interest of the old population so that they can enjoy the rest of the remaining years of their life.

Sample 1:

Many schools make it requisite for their students to wear a uniform, but recently, this policy has been criticised as oppressive. I fundamentally believe that uniforms are an obligatory component of school life and should be maintained for practical and pedagogical reasons.

There are many reasons why uniforms are essential in schools. To start with, it creates a positive environment in schools; consequently, school decorum is maintained efficiently as poor children are not bullied based on their clothes. It also eradicates any disparity between the rich and poor pupils. Consequently, a happy environment is concocted.

Moreover, the uniform enables children to concentrate more on their studies rather than on their wardrobe. When they do not have to worry about what to wear to school, they can work to achieve their goals. Additionally, parents’ hard-earned money is saved as children are supposed to abide by uniforms. For instance, many parents are happy to send their children to schools where uniforms are compulsory.

On the other hand, some high schools do not entail their students to wear uniforms. Uniforms should not be the primary concern of academic education, and schools should focus more on the curriculum quality and learning process than on attire. Furthermore, spending on school uniforms can be an unthrifty investment, as the fund could be administered for books or stationery.

To conclude, I would pen down to say that wearing a school uniform for students is vital for the quality of the studying process. Still, school children should also have the opportunity to not wear a school uniform because of factors like price and financial options in families.

Sample 2:

The policy of mandatory school uniforms is a common practice in many countries across the world. While it has its share of critics, I firmly believe that the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will delve into the reasons for this viewpoint, providing relevant examples to substantiate the argument.

Implementing a school uniform policy is beneficial for a number of reasons. Firstly, uniforms act as a social equaliser, reducing the visible socio-economic disparities between students. For instance, in a school where everyone is required to wear the same attire, it is more difficult to distinguish between a student from a low-income family and one from a more affluent background based on what they are wearing. Secondly, uniforms can minimise distractions and help maintain a focus on academics. Without the pressure to keep up with fashion trends, students can better concentrate on their studies. Lastly and perhaps most importantly, unforms promote a shared identity and purpose, fostering a sense of belonging that cultivates a supportive environment where they feel accepted, valued, and understood. This can be seen during school events and activities where students in uniform exude a sense of pride and solidarity.  

Despite these advantages, there are valid concerns associated with mandatory school uniforms. On the other hand, critics argue that uniforms can suppress individuality and freedom of expression. This is a significant concern in adolescence, a period marked by the exploration of personal identity. Furthermore, for some families, purchasing uniforms can pose a significant financial challenge. This is particularly true in cases where schools require specific, often more expensive, branded uniforms or uniforms constituting multiple items of clothing.

In conclusion, while the challenges cannot be overlooked, the benefits of mandatory school uniforms, such as promoting equality, reducing distractions and fostering a sense of belonging are substantial. Therefore, it is my belief that the advantages do outweigh the disadvantages. However, it is crucial that schools implement a uniform policy do so with sensitivity and tact, taking into account the financial implications for families and allowing some room for individual expression within the stipulated guidelines.

Sample 3:

In many parts of the world, kids are required to wear uniforms to school always. As expected, this practice has stirred up a lot of controversy among the populace. This essay will identify some of the advantages and disadvantages of this policy and provide relevant examples from personal experience.

To begin with, the practice encourages and fosters a sense of identity for these students. Consequently, they will be easily spotted as minors wherever they go. This really helps when it comes to security, as school uniform-wearing kids can be easily noticed, when found outside school premises. Secondly, youngsters will be free to mingle with each other and are identified as peers when wearing the same apparel. Socio-economic differences are eliminated and are all seen as equals. A classic example of this is when I was in the boarding house during my upper primary school days. We only saw ourselves as different; in terms of the haves and the have-nots, during weekends when parents and guardian come to visit their wards. The cars they drove in, the provisions they brought to their wards and the whole pageantry really highlighted the differences between the poor and the rich.

On the other hand, insisting that these young ones wear a prescribed attire is an infringement on their civil liberties. This policy does not give consideration to their inclinations or natural tendencies to dress in a particular way, that makes them feel comfortable. Furthermore, the cost implications to parents for providing these uniforms is not considered. Whenever school reopens from vacation, it is observed that the prices; of stationery and other student paraphernalia, increases.

In conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of the mandatory uniforms for institutions need to be weighed and considered carefully. Whiles the policy promotes equality and enhances security, it also limits self-expression and imposes financial burden on parents and guardians alike.

Sample 4:

In numerous nations, students are required to wear uniforms. This policy has both advantages and disadvantages, and whether it is beneficial depends on various factors.

On the one hand, one key advantage is that the same clothes promote a sense of equality among students. When everyone wears the same attire, it reduces socioeconomic distinctions, fostering a sense of unity and belonging within the institute community and fostering a more inclusive atmosphere. Learners from more affluent houses will not be singled out against the background of those from low-income families. Moreover, the same suits may contribute to a safer environment. With a standardized dress code, it becomes easier for school staff to identify intruders or individuals who do not belong on the premises. In this case, the added security measure can help prevent unauthorized individuals from entering the college and ensure the safety of students.

On the other hand, there are drawbacks. A number of argue that it limits students' freedom of expression and stifles their individuality. Wearing the same clothes might hinder their ability to express their unique personalities. For example, pupils who identify themselves in which subculture will not wear the attributes of a given culture and manifest themselves, this can potentially stifle creativity and self-expression, which are crucial aspects of personal development. Additionally, the financial burden on parents to constantly purchase outfits can be a concern. Not all families can afford to buy multiple sets of uniforms, and the added expense may create financial stress.

In conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of mandatory institute uniforms need to be carefully weighed. While they promote equality and potentially enhance safety, the restriction on self-expression and the financial burden on the specific circumstances and community.

Sample 1:

The world's biggest cities are alluring new inhabitants the way giant sponges suck the water out of their surrounding areas. Despite the various benefits the cities can provide, the quality of life suffers under a diverse set of environmental and socio-economic issues. In this essay, the most prevalent reasons for this issue and viable solutions will be discussed.

One of the most critical reasons for the shattering quality of city life is various environmental pollutions. The smog in capital cities and other high-density urban areas - e.g. Shanghai and Los Angeles - has become unbearable for their inhabitants and requires the undertaking of great measures. Another critical reason for deteriorating urban life quality is the intensified crime rates. For that reason, people are living under constant fear and threat, leaving them prone to stress-related diseases and higher probabilities of falling victims of crimes. For instance, in some of Latin America's biggest cities, it is not recommended for women to walk alone in the streets even during daylight and this city is not alone.

For the problems, there are always solutions. Referring back to the pollution problem, the cure has been declared mainly by means of cleaner energy and transportation systems. Many so-called 'green cities' like Copenhagen are leading the way in the development of higher quality public transports and prioritising light vehicle traffic. Dealing with crimes is far more complicated. Psychologists believe that a more beautiful, clean and happy external environment can reduce crime levels. Thus, this can be something city planners should look into more deeply when planning our urban areas. But most likely, providing people with a sufficient amount of opportunities and guidance in their lives would be the most effective prevention measure as far as I believe.

To conclude, there are many adversities that can reduce the urban life quality such as environmental pollution and crime; however, there are also opportunities and tools to reduce these effects. Mainly, planning our cities more wisely by taking care of negative environmental and socio-economic effects on peoples' well-being, is necessary and doable.

Sample 2:

Rapid industrialisation and urbanisation from the beginning of this century have drastically changed the urban landscape and brought unprecedented possibilities and opportunities - but not without the cost of declining living standards for city dwellers. Exponential population growth and unplanned urbanisation are the primary reasons for this declining quality of life. Proper urban planning, investing in public transports and offering government subsidies could be some effective solutions, in my opinion. 

The prosperity and opportunity in big cities have attracted a huge number of people and the inrush of the population to major cities all around the world paradoxically made life difficult for all. With the ever-increasing number of inhabitants, cities become overcrowded, expensive, competitive and polluted. Growing competition shoot the property rent, makes employment difficult and increases traffic congestion. For example, the higher residents in many capital cities around the world make them congested, exorbitantly expensive and polluted. Therefore, urban citizens, especially the less well off, often experience a lower standard of living and get exposed to the negative sides of urban life.

Considering the solutions, first, better planning is required. Some important amenities like public parks, sports centres, alternative roads and other infrastructures and facilities could dramatically enhance people's quality of living. Extensive investment in public transports would ease traffic congestion and make better transportation accessible to all. In theory, this would reduce air pollution, and possibly improve the well-being of the population. Finally, the government has to heavily subsidise important sectors like healthcare, education and entertainment so that they do not get more expensive and unaffordable for poor and middle-class people. 

To conclude, the city attracts large population inflows basically with the promises of a better life, which, paradoxically then causes pressure on existing infrastructure, living costs and life standard. To mitigate such drawbacks, we need to have proper solutions including better planning and more government subsidies.

Sample 3:

It is believed that the quality of life in big cities is declining and people who live in big cities always complain about numerous issues they face. The following essay will discuss some major reasons behind the issue, and some steps that people and government could take to resolve the problem.  
For a number of reasons, many people believe that the quality of life in cosmopolitan cities such as New Delhi, London, Beijing, New York, and Jakarta is degrading. Firstly, it is obvious that large cities have problems with traffic. As the population in big cities is growing rapidly each year, it means that the number of cars that commute on streets is also increasing. The growing number of cars on streets and highways will definitely cause traffic congestion and impact on the air quality as well. Secondly, it is a fact that in many big cities such as New York or Manila, the crime rate is considerably higher. Consequently, the local people do not feel safe when they walk in the park or in the subway station, as they could be robbed or injured anytime. Increasing living expenses, housing issues, and ever-increasing competition in workplaces are some other reasons for the degraded lifestyle in such big cities. The rapid growth of new supermalls, factories and offices in residential areas are also the reasons many people feel that the quality of life in big cities is decreasing.     

There are some solutions that governments and communities could consider addressing the problem. One of them is that governments should provide decent and comfortable public transportation. By having a good public transportation system, it is hoped that people will choose to use public buses or trains rather than driving their own cars. As a result, it will reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. Another solution is that government should add more policemen and install more surveillance videos in areas with high crime activities. By having more policemen and video recorders, criminals will think twice before they do any crimes. Lastly, as existing big cities are overcrowded, governments should develop new residential and commercial areas. By having these new areas, it is hoped that some of the city people will move to new areas and reduce the density issue. Decentralisation of cities could be another effective solution to decrease the ever-increasing population in the cities. Finally, commercial areas should be kept far away from the residential areas and unplanned commercialisation in such areas should be prohibited.  
In conclusion, it is a fact that the quality of life in large cities is decreasing nowadays, and it is mainly due to density, traffic, uncontrolled commercialization and crime problems. However, there are some recommendations that governments could consider and apply. They should build a better public transportation system, add more security personnel and develop new areas. By doing these recommendations, it is hoped that the quality of life in big cities will get better. 

Sample 4:

Cities are growing. Unfortunately, this development does have some negative aspects. It is a known fact that the quality of life in large cities is not very good because they are home to more people than they can possibly accommodate. 

Environmental pollution and unhygienic surroundings are a common problem in many cities. When a city houses more people than it can possibly afford, it is hard to maintain cleanliness. Unhygienic surroundings are the breeding ground for germs and cause many health problems. Vehicular pollution affects the quality of air and leads to many respiratory ailments. All of these affect the quality of life in cities. 

The cost of living is also pretty high in metros. In large cities, it is hard to find decent accommodation within one’s budget. Consequently, people are forced to buy ridiculously small homes for huge prices. Those who cannot afford to do so spend the whole of their lives in rented apartments. Worse still, the law-and-order situation in many big cities is not particularly good making them unsafe for visitors as well as those dwelling in those localities. 

However, many of these problems can be solved with a little bit of planning. High population density is the main reason that reduces the quality of life in cities. Although this is not exactly avoidable, governments can reduce the migration to cities by making jobs available in smaller towns as well. For example, environmental units can be set up in small towns and villages. If these units employ the people living nearby, they will not have to move into large cities. What’s more, the fact that cities are home to a large number of people makes it possible for civic bodies to collect more money from taxes etc. If these taxes are utilized properly civic authorities can build better roads and flyovers that will ease the traffic congestion. And by improving the quality of public health care, the government can ensure that all people get medical attention when they need it. 

In conclusion, poor planning and the centralization of jobs is the main reason that reduces the quality of life in large cities. However, these problems are solvable to a great extent. The governments just need to make a determined effort to decentralize the jobs. 

Sample 5:

The standard of living in big cities is declining in many nations. There are several explanations for this situation and some solutions could be taken to address it.

The deterioration of life quality in metropolises stems from some main factors. The first and probably most fundamental is overpopulation. Cities are magnets for people from rural areas who aspire for better job opportunities and living conditions. This influx of immigrants has prompted many inconveniences such as housing shortage, traffic congestion and skyrocketing prices due to high demands. Overpopulation also correlates with another major reason for lower city life quality: environmental pollution. A larger number of residents often means an increasing volume of personal vehicles and municipal waste, which would contaminate the air and water sources. Degrading air and water quality is also one of the main causes of many diseases.

In the long run, these issues can be resolved with some possible measures. First of all, to address environmental problems, urban authorities should invest in building green infrastructure. For instance, local governments could plant more trees to purify the air and fund more money to install modern waste treatment systems. Regarding the issue of overpopulation, one method is that governments create better working and living conditions in suburban areas to attract dwellers, hence decentralizing urban cities. States could do this by incentivizing corporations, by policies such as tax support, to move their offices and factories away from the city center.

To summarize, overpopulation and environmental degradation are the primary causes of low quality of life in major cities. These issues are addressable if governments can spend more on building sustainable facilities and decentralizing jobs.

Sample 6:

Many cities across the globe are witnessing a decline in the quality of life. This essay will look at the reasons behind this and give some possible measures to overcome the problems of city dwellers.

Firstly, an ever-increasing population and migration of people from rural to urban areas have caused congestion. This has led to growth in the numbers of slums in some areas. Slums as we know do not have any basic facilities like hospitals, sanitation, clean drinking water and are a hotbed of diseases. As a result of living in unhygienic conditions, not only people in slums suffer from serious health problems but also aid the cause of spreading flu and other viruses. Secondly, hectic schedules and excessive workload also hamper the quality of life. To explain it further, extended working hours and long commuting time leave urbanites with hardly ever time to involve in recreational activities which are indispensable to ensure the wellbeing of human beings. As a consequence, there has been a sharp rise in the prevalence of psychiatric problems among people in large cities.

To look at the possible measures, the government should develop affordable accommodation facilities to accommodate an ever-growing number of city dwellers. There should be strict restrictions on the building of slums and stern action need to be taken against offenders. In order to control the influx of rural migrants, the government should focus on the development of the countryside. Gyms and recreational facilities like parks, gardens and yoga centres should also be constructed by the government and there should be no charge to use them. Moreover, the positives of good health should be highlighted, asking people to follow a balanced life.

To conclude, unfettered growth of population, stressful lifestyle and lack of basic facilities in certain areas have made life worse in cities. Undoubtedly, if this situation is to be improved, effective measures have to be taken.

Sample 7:

The global phenomenon of urbanization from the beginning of industrialization to the present day has brought opportunity and prosperity, albeit at a cost in the quality of life. With an increasing city population, the complexity of the challenges also increases. The causes and solutions for this are outlined below.

The causes for the decrease in the quality of life are paradoxically the prosperity endowed on such metropolitan centres. Their growth is largely due to the increase in opportunities on offer, which in turn increases their attractiveness; essentially they are trapped in a positive self-reinforcing cycle.

However, this eventually leads to a decrease in the quality of life as the city can experience overcrowding, exorbitant property prices, and increased vulnerability to terrorist attacks. For example, the density of London makes it a more efficient place to attack, when compared to a smaller city, such as Bradford. Therefore, due to continuous growth and prosperity, urban citizens, especially the less well off, often experience a lower standard of living.

Considering the solutions, greater investment in public transport would ease traffic congestion, as would bike lanes. In theory this would reduce air pollution and possibly improve the wellbeing of the population if they did adopt a more active lifestyle and cycle to work.

To counter violent terrorist attacks, cities could embark on CCTV installations, so as to closely monitor for threats. For example, it is said, the CCTV in London has foiled many potential attacks, and therefore greatly increased the security of its citizens.

To conclude, a wealthy city attracts large population inflows, which then causes pressure on existing infrastructure and security. Various solutions exist to mitigate such drawbacks, but nevertheless a definite solution has yet to be found.

Sample 8:

People living in cities are increasing rapidly these days. While the quality of life in metropolitans is diminishing gradually. This essay will discuss causes and solutions for decreasing better growth in urban areas.

The two main reasons for reduced quality life in metro areas are air pollution and traffic problems. Even though cities are expanding significantly, air pollution levels are eventually increasing. For example, according to a survey the mankind living in these contaminated regions are suffering from serious critical illness issues. Besides this, the other cause is traffic congestion. Most of the people commute daily using their own vehicles instead of using public transport. For instance, humans in developing countries utilize personal cars to office rather than depending on transit to save time.

The two major solutions to this situation are decentralization of development and increasing public transportation options. The development in a country should be distributed to different areas, despite restricting to only few towns. To illustrate, government should spread administration to different to various cities in a province or state. Next, the government should increase the number of buses and trains for easy commute to their residents. To elaborate, if there are a greater number of buses and trains people tend to utilize them since they feel comfortable and also to save money. Implementing these two solutions will improve the air condition and reduce the traffic issues.

To summarize, pollution and transportation problems can be reduced by decentralization of development and improving public transits. The above essay has discussed the causes of bad quality of life in cities and the solutions for improvement.

Sample 9:

These days, the quality of human life is in decline. This is mainly because of the sedentary lifestyle of people and increasing pollution all around the world, especially in metropolitan cities. There are a number of solutions which should be implemented to deal with this growing concern.

Firstly, the reason for the decrease in quality of life is people's desk-bound job. In other words, people have to sit for long hours in the offices in order to complete their work. Due to increasing competition, employees have the fear of losing their jobs, thus the majority of the working population stretch their limits to work till late nights or whenever employer demands. Therefore, such professionals hardly get time for exercise and as a result, they become obese and more prone to illness. Secondly, it is also due to the increasing pollution in metro cities. There is a rapid growth of private vehicles in big cities, because of lack of public transport, which is causing pollution, and everybody’s life is getting affected by it.

There are two effective solutions to sustain or improve the quality of human lives. One way to improve this is by educating people about the benefits of yoga and exercise. The government should invest in more parks and people should be encouraged to take time out of their busy schedule to use these parks for morning-evening walks and other activities. Another method of dealing with this problem is by improving the public transport facilities in all the major cities. Availability of cheap and comfortable public transport, such as metro, will make people choose those over own vehicles.

In conclusion, motivating people to incorporate exercise into their daily life and improved public transport are effective in dealing with this issue. If these solutions are implemented, quality of life would improve.

Sample 10:

In the contemporary era, the standard of living is declining among those people living in major cities. There are a number of causes for this situation, but certain measures could be taken to alleviate this problem. This essay will discuss the causes and suggest viable solutions.

There are several causes for this position. The main one is that, people are working in different companies with more pressure to improve their life cycle, but this will only lead to major health issues such as stress, hypertension and heart-related diseases. In addition to that people are consuming more unhealthy processed foods nowadays. The major contributing companies are KFC, Mc Donalds, Burger king is very popular among the busiest people. As a result, medical council of London issue a statement that people with above mentioned problems surge in mortality rate.

Various possible courses of action could be taken to tackle the above. In the first place, the government should launch nationwide campaign to raise public awareness about the importance of quality of life in the current scenario. For instance, companies should arrange for alternative work patterns and flexible working time. Another way forward could be minister of health should advertise in the televisions and other mass medias about the obesity which affects the younger generation both physically and mentally. The Asian countries are prime examples where 60% to 80% of people affected by obesity. In fact, this is medically proved by many countries.

In conclusion, various factors lead to the problems related to growth quality, but this situation can be addressed by launching of health campaign and implementation of effective regulations on oily foods. Given the situation, it is recommended that the necessary steps be taken in order to ensure that the life quality of people in the country improves.

Sample 1:

It is true that some people contend that economic growth is the only solution to the global problems of hunger and poverty. Others, however, argue for an end to economic growth to conserve our environment. I agree completely with this second view.

Those who see economic growth alone as the sole cure for the tragedy of world hunger and poverty propose one major argument. Only the growth of the economies of developing countries will provide the poor with the wealth to afford the basic necessities of life. The profits made by corporations that are responsible for this economic growth will trickle down in the form of financial benefits to be enjoyed by the starving and needy. This view has justified the age of imperialism and the destruction of the livelihood of millions in the name of progress.

On the other hand, there are countless examples to support the opposing view that economic growth results in environmental destruction. Firstly, this is true for developing countries, where lowland rainforests have been cleared and unsustainable agricultural practices introduced to produce cash crops, often for export. Secondly, it is also true for developed economies. For example, the continued use of fossil fuels, which provide the energy for growing industrialization, causes global warming. This leads to a rise in sea levels, which will eventually make tens of millions of poor people in Bangladesh homeless.

In conclusion, economic growth which is not sustainable must be stopped. If it is not based on meeting human needs rather than generating profits, such growth will only create more poverty and lead to more hunger in the world by destroying natural resources.

Sample 2:

It is widely acknowledged that many parts of the world are still struggling with abject poverty and hunger. While a school of thought holds that these thorny problems are best dealt with by developing the economy prosperously, others claim that this solution is synonymous with wreaking havoc on the environment and thus it should come to a halt. This essay would discuss both views before drawing a reasoned conclusion.

Economic growth is irrefutably central to lifting a country out of austerity and hardship. Obviously, the rapid development of the national economy could markedly boost disposable incomes and living standards of citizens. Increased life quality aside, economic progression could go a long way towards addressing pressing social issues such as crime and unemployment, which is instrumental in turning poverty-stricken countries into more livable and affluent ones. However, there exist other ways to cope with poverty and hunger. In particular, education and healthcare could provide a more educated and physically adequate workforce to elevate a nation out of poverty.

The aforementioned benefits notwithstanding, the rapid development of the economic situation could inevitably do the environment a disservice. In fact, manufacturing and transportation activities have been releasing a staggering amount of carbon emissions and effluents, triggering serious air and water contamination. Regardless, instead of curbing economic growth, the government can impose more stringent punishments on individuals and organizations that are advertently doing harm to the environment. For example, in South Korea, the state has administered more stringent punishments on factories and plants that deliberately discharge an excessive amount of harmful chemicals into the air and water sources, resulting in improved environmental quality in this nation.

In conclusion, growing the economy is not the only way to address pressing issues like poverty and starvation as educational and healthcare support are also critical. The government should develop the economy in a more sustainable way that could effectively safeguard the environment rather than halting it.

Sample 3:

In the contemporary world, the debate between the necessity of economic growth and its environmental repercussions has become increasingly pronounced. While some argue that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, a growing faction insists that such growth is environmentally unsustainable, advocating for its cessation. This essay aims to explore both perspectives, ultimately positing that a balanced approach is essential for sustainable development.

Proponents of economic growth as a panacea for poverty and hunger assert that it catalyzes job creation, bolsters income levels, and substantially elevates living standards. By embracing the assertion that "economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty," they illuminate the transformative journeys of nations like China and India, which have propelled millions out of poverty through dynamic economic progression. This viewpoint emphasizes the conviction that, when judiciously orchestrated, economic expansion can furnish indispensable resources for comprehensive social welfare programs, advanced healthcare, and quality education, effectively diminishing poverty indices and significantly bolstering food security across communities.

Conversely, critics of unchecked economic growth spotlight its adverse impacts on the environment, arguing that it precipitates resource exhaustion, pollution escalation, and stark biodiversity erosion. This faction underscores that the relentless pursuit of growth frequently overlooks substantial environmental costs, including the exacerbated greenhouse gas emissions that intensify global warming. Advocating for sustainable growth paradigms that integrate environmental stewardship, they champion the adoption of renewable energy sources, sustainable agricultural practices, and innovative green technologies. From this vantage point, the discourse evolves to suggest that economic growth need not be abandoned but thoughtfully redefined to ensure its alignment with ecological preservation, thereby fostering a sustainable future for both the economy and the environment.

In conclusion, while economic growth has undeniably played a crucial role in reducing poverty and hunger, its environmental implications cannot be ignored. A holistic approach, marrying economic development with environmental sustainability, emerges as the most prudent path forward. By fostering innovations that ensure economic growth does not come at the expense of our planet, we can strive towards a future where both humanity and nature thrive in harmony.

Sample 4:

There are opposing views regarding economic growth and the environment, as people tend to think that these two are mutually exclusive and believe that only an economic growth can address the hunger and destitution. In my opinion, along with its negative on the environment, economic ballooning is not the only creditworthy to alleviate the penury. This essay is going to discuss how economic prosperity brings an income security at the expense of environmental damage by deforestation.

Economic growth is crucial to ensure people in society to have stable jobs. People with a consistent income can easily meet their basic needs and ensure their safety by all means, and mostly they can live a longer life. In fact, the economic stability keeps people active with a sense of financial security, which eventually helps them to prosper in their every sphere of life. Furthermore, there is without a doubt that the unemployment rate is usually lower in countries which have prosperous economic growth. Most people have a stable income and fewer chances of being broke. They do not need to struggle for living.

However, an economic growth comes at the cost of a serious negative effect on the environment. For example, companies cut down a lot of trees in order to build high-rise commercial buildings. Deforestation will affect the environment and lead to global warming. Furthermore, various manufacturing plants operate through biochemical processes which can cause ecological disasters. And also, by releasing environmentally hazardous chemical compounds, industries are constantly contaminating the environment, which is pushing various species to the verge of extinction.

Even though economic growth could help to reduce destitution, it comes at the expense of the environmental degradation causing deforestation and animal extinction. Weighing in both sides, I believe that economic ballooning cannot be the only contributor to alleviate poverty, as it creates a serious ecological damage alongside.

Sample 5:

A section of people believes that economic prosperity is the only method towards ending famine and poverty, since it provides more job vacancies. Whereas others think that this growth must be seized due to its harmful effects on the environment, such as pollution. However, this essay views that initially an economic growth might be achieved at the expense of the environment, but eventually it compensates the environmental damage by generating much needed employments and overall financial well beings. The following paragraphs will discuss both sides of views, along with my opinion afterwards.

To begin with, financial growth generally provides more job opportunities in the market. In other words, companies will need more employees to respond to the prolific market’s demands. Therefore, people will benefit from the wages received to afford goods, food, and many other life’s demands. In Ethiopia, the government is encouraging investors to build factories so the poor residents can benefit from working and earning money, thereby ending famine and poverty.

On the other hand, many believe that economic prosperity means more pollution, since more factories will be working and therefore a rise in the toxic emissions in the air. In fact, the reason why China is among the countries with the highest rate of pollution is the thousands of factories working daily to produce more goods. However, I think that a growth in the economy is the only solution to end food and money shortage since it leads to providing more jobs to unemployed people.

To conclude, economic prosperity is seen by many to be advantageous since it ends hunger and poverty by providing more jobs and financial support to the people in need. However, many advocate that this prosperity takes its toll on the environment by polluting the air. I think a growth in the economic situation of a country will definitely stop food and money shortage due to a rise in the employment sector.

Sample 6:

In today’s contemporary society, there is an intense debate about prioritizing economic development. Some argue that this priority should be stopped due to its negative impacts on the environment, while others, including myself, believe that it is crucial to continue boosting the economy as it is the primary financial source to combat hunger and poverty.

It is acknowledged that economic development does have some adverse effects on the environment. The expansion of industrial zones and recreational centers has led to deforestation and habitat loss for various animals. Additionally, untreated waste from factories contributes significantly to air and water pollution. However, these environmental issues can be mitigated through well-planned urbanization and stricter regulations without halting economic activities.

On the contrary, I assert that economic growth is essential for addressing hunger and poverty. Firstly, it enables the establishment of educational institutions, providing residents with necessary knowledge and skills for decent employment. This, in turn, helps people afford daily necessities, especially food, lifting them out of poverty. Secondly, governments can implement monetary subsidies and food programs for the needy, but these initiatives require significant economic resources.

In conclusion, while economic development may contribute to environmental degradation, it can be managed alongside sustainable practices. Economic growth remains crucial in tackling hunger and poverty effectively, making it a priority for a better society.

Sample 7:

Many people believe economic development is the only solution to end hunger and poverty, while others think that economic growth should be stopped due to the harmful effects it has on the environment. In this essay, I will examine both arguments and then give my personal opinion.

It is true that economic growth has taken a heavy toll on the environment. Firstly, the ever-increasing demand for industrial development has led to the construction of more factories and manufacturing facilities, which has significantly raised the volume of atmospheric greenhouse gases, which are considered to be the main culprit behind global warming. Furthermore, human activities, such as clearing forests for farming, are directly responsible for the loss of natural habitats for many wild plants and animals, pushing these species to the verge of extinction. This, together with the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, poses serious threats to the survival of mankind, especially with today’s rapidly increasing population.

However, trying to stop the economy from developing, due to the drawbacks, is not a rational approach, for economic growth is still the most effective measure to tackle poverty and hunger. A healthy economy will create more employment opportunities for those who come from underprivileged backgrounds, and thus ensure stable income for these people. Therefore, they will be able to earn enough money to cover basic living expenses. Besides this, economic growth also has a crucial role to play in the fight against hunger. With a more generous budget to invest in agricultural development, for example, governments can invest in modern machinery to automate the labour-intensive processes of growing and harvesting crops. Such a boost in productivity will increase food production and eventually put an end to hunger.

In conclusion, it is understandable why many people believe that economic growth should be stopped to protect our environment, however, I think the government should not rely on such a desperate measure because the benefits brought about by economic growth, not only in the fight against poverty and hunger, are far more significant than the drawbacks.

Sample 8:

It is thought by a few people that, a growth of economy leads to environmental issues, and should not continue. I totally agree with this argument, even though it is believed that economic growth can help to end world poverty.

To begin with, an increase in the economy in some countries is usually contributed by industries. It is because industries can help to increase a country's income through export trading. For example, in the United Emirates Arab, their economy is growing because of the oil and mining industries. They are able to export their oil and mining resources to other countries. However, industry activities often generate pollution in the form of water and air pollution. This pollution can affect several environmental issues such as global warming and climate change, which can harm all species on the earth.

In fact, countries still can manage their economies side while protecting the environment. In order to solve this issue, governments can create a regulation for businesses in running their activities. For instance, a regulation for waste disposal for the industry to prevent the pollutant caused by the manufacturer activities. Then, for businesses that do not implement this regulation in their activities, they need to pay the fine and get a punishment, and they need to stop operating their businesses until they can solve the disposal issue. In addition, the business player itself can create a program of Corporate Social Responsibility with a focus on environmental activity, such as planting trees, or cleaning waste in certain areas.

To sum up, economic growth can harm the environment is a fact due to the activity that usually can generate pollutions which can lead to environmental issues. However, there are several solutions to solve this issue by creating a regulation for the waste disposal process and Corporate Social Responsibility events.

Sample 9:

Nowadays, the controversial issue of balancing environmental protection with economic growth has captured our attention more than ever. While some believe that developing the economy is crucial for improving our general lives, others argue that it has a detrimental effect on the environment and must be halted. I align myself with the latter and this essay will provide details explaining why.

On one hand, the proponents of a stronger economy may argue that it can alleviate poverty and enhance many aspects of life. This is because economic growth can improve living standards, provide better education opportunities, and generate more job prospects. For example, the establishment of new factories creates employment opportunities. This leads to increased incomes and self-sufficiency for the less fortunate.

On the other hand, the pursuit of development comes at a significant environmental cost, resulting in uncontrollable ecological footprints that contaminate our rivers and streams. These harmful actions have the potential to irreversibly damage our natural surroundings. In recent decades, nature has retaliated with numerous calamities, such as hailstorms and earthquakes, indicating the consequences of our unsustainable practices. Therefore, if we do not take immediate action, we risk compromising our ability to enjoy the benefits of economic growth.

In conclusion, although it is undeniable that a growing economy can upgrade people’s lives, the preservation of nature should be prioritised. In my opinion, we still can pursue economic development, but we should not neglect its impacts on the environment. By doing so, we can work towards eliminating all disastrous effects.

Sample 10:

People have different views about whether economic development is positive or not for humans and our planet Earth. While some people argue that economic growth may lead to environmental problems, I believe that it is an essential factor to cope with poverty issues and some measures can be taken to tackle the problems caused by it.

On the one hand, economic growth is vital for dealing with poverty problems. A healthy economy is an important financial source for governments and having sufficient revenue is essential to invest in infrastructure and other industries, which can help to improve the quality of life for impoverished populations. For example, governments need money to build social housing and provide free food for the poor. Besides, individuals can also benefit from a growing economy because it can provide job opportunities to residents. Without a healthy economy, both authorities and individuals will be difficult to live a prosperous future.

On the other hand, it is true that economic developments have led to several environmental problems. Firstly, exhaust fumes produced by the growing number of vehicles and carbon dioxide gases emitted by industrial factories have resulted in severe air pollution and the greenhouse effect. This has led to climate change, and thousands of inhabitants are displaced because of floods and poor air quality. Secondly, water pollution can be seen in developing countries because there are no proper regulations with regard to the protection of the environment. Businessmen only care about making a profit and they pay no attention to the treatment of sewage. However, this does not mean that we should stop pursuing economic development. Stringent laws should be introduced by governments, and we can also do something to help to reduce environmental problems.

In conclusion, although a booming economy may lead to some environmental issues, I believe that economic growth is essential to us to end poverty and food crisis, and measures should be taken by governments and individuals to cope with such problems.

Sample 1:

Some people argue that there should be a ban on plastic shopping bags because they pollute the land and the sea. I completely agree with this point of view because most of them are sent to landfill sites after being discarded and many find their way to the oceans.

The majority of plastic shopping bags end up being landfilled. If there is no ban on plastic bags, most people will continue to use them when they shop since this is more convenient than bringing their own bags. However, plastic bags are difficult and expensive to recycle. Consequently, after they have been thrown away, most of them are sent to landfill sites. As they sit there, they break down into tiny particles, which then enter the soil and food chain.

In addition, plastic shopping bags can always find their way to the sea. The ones discarded on the beach may be blown into the sea. Even those thrown on the streets and sitting on landfill sites may be blown into gutters and discharged with sewage into rivers, and then reach the sea. Since plastic bags take hundreds of years to decompose, they become deadly waste in the oceans. For example, sea turtles that have ingested plastic bags can die from starvation. They may mistakenly believe that they have eaten enough because their stomachs are full.

In conclusion, most plastic bags are dumped in landfill sites after they have been used and many end up in the oceans. This damages the land and the sea and therefore I strongly believe that their use should not be allowed.

Sample 2:

The use of plastic bags is one of the major causes of environmental pollution. Hence, it is thought that banning plastic shopping bags is a need. I completely agree with this idea and think that the plastic bag ban would reduce the high-level pollution of land and sea.

Shopping bags which are made of plastic play a primary role in increasing pollution. These plastic materials which are thrown into seas lead to the death of marine creatures. For example, the number of marine mammals has decreased alarmingly in the oceans due to the great level of pollution which results from plastic materials. Furthermore, nearly a hundred of Caretta Caretta is dying per year since they consume plastics for food. Therefore, implementing a ban on bags which is made of plastic for the use of shopping would be beneficial to save marine life.

Another justified reason behind such a ban is that plastic materials such as shopper bags contain chemicals which damage the productivity of agriculture because of affecting negatively the soil quality. Furthermore, this situation is threatening to people’s health because leading to severe health issues such as cancer and blood-related diseases. Instead of using plastic bags, for shoppers, the government should invest and promote the use of paper bags, which are eco-friendly and recyclable. Unless the government bans plastic bags, people will suffer from the lack of healthy agricultural products and have a risk of getting cancer.

In conclusion, shopper bags made of plastic should be banned because they are detrimental to both marine lives, and the soil quality, which plays an important role in growing healthy vegetables and fruits. In my opinion, paper or carton bag usage can be replaced the plastic bags shoppers use.

Sample 3:

It is undeniable that plastic bags play an essential role on a daily basis. Numerous people think the government should forbid the use of plastic bags due to devastating pollution. I totally agree with the statement because of some reasons mentioned below.

To begin with, there are a number of factors why plastic bags pollute the land. Initially, plastic wastes have been dumped in landfills. This means that it would deteriorate human health in such a way that leads to diseases like food poisoning. Moreover, Polythene became the silent killer of the human body which contributes to being sick due to its contained chemicals. Consequently, Elastic could harm and adversely affect individuals’ health. To illustrate, over years past the high amount of population workers in India got sick because they grew vegetables in the area that was used to dump the elastic wastes.

Secondly, plastic bags affect not only the land but also seriously the sea. A high number of marine species used to swallow some elastic ones with their food. For instance, every year the reporter has always reported the death of sea animals like fishes and particularly whales caused by an indigestible problem. Therefore, unless there is a stop to the use of polythene bags, the extinction of rare marine species will make the situation worse.

In conclusion, I personally advocate for a ban on using plastic bags. Thus, the government should more strictly prohibit the use of plastic bags and should strongly educate about unsafe elastic before increasing risks.

Sample 4:

Nowadays the question of whether the government should ban plastic shopping bags due to their contribution to land and sea pollution has been receiving a great deal of public attention. I totally agree with the statement because of some reasons mentioned below.

First, there are a number of reasons why plastic bags pollute the land. They can often be dumped in the landfill, so plastic molecules mix in the land. This means that they would deteriorate human health in such a way that leads to diseases like food poisoning. They could be called “The silent killers of the human body”. Moreover, they contained vibrant colours so they could toxicate their content, and adversely affect the users’ health who use them frequently. For example, in 2004, a lot of farmers got sick in Mumbai, India because they used to grow vegetables in the area which was used to dump the plastic waste.

Second, plastic bags affect not only land but also the sea seriously. If people cast them into the ocean, the marine species will swallow plastic bags with their food, which hinder animals’ digestive progress and push them to the brink of death. According to a report by the World Health Organization has revealed that every year, ten million fishes die on account of the consumption of polythene. Unless there is a stop in the use of plastic bags, the extinction of rare marine species will make the situation worse.

In conclusion, I advocate that forbidding the use of plastic bags is an essential action. The authority should invest more money in producing alternative products for people to use in their daily lives.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, plastic carrier usage has increased at an alarming rate. Whilst some people and I hold the view that plastic shopping bags should be outlawed because they have deleterious effects on the environment. In addition, the Oceans’ marine life has borne the brunt of drawbacks caused by their disposal. My contention will be further explained.

Firstly, plastic bags have a negative impact on the habitat because they are non-biodegradable. In other words, when these bags are buried in the soil or even thrown into the ocean and wild animals eat them, plastic will enter the food chain causing different issues or even death. For example, a hungry turtle may be mistaken transparent plastic bags for a jellyfish and eat it, the turtle will choke on the plastic as it cannot digest it and die painfully. Hence, what can be said is that these types of carriers maybe take hundreds of years to decompose into pieces.

Moreover, plastic bags contain toxic chemical elements that will negatively affect the air when burnt. This means that if these harmful by-products are released into the air and inhaled by people, they will result in many lethal diseases such as cancer. A prime example of this is research conducted by the World Health Organization revealed that a plethora of Chinese people had lung cancer due to air pollution. Thus, plastic bags not only affect the air but also have a detrimental impact on the soil’s fertility resulting in a reduction in crops’ yield.

In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that bags made of plastic should be completely banned. Therefore, I am convinced that the government should legislate the laws that prohibited the usage of these packs.

Sample 6:

Nowadays, it is proven that non-biodegradable products are very negative for the natural environment. The highly plastic waste has polluted cities, the countryside and the oceans. As a result of this, some people would argue that plastic shopping bags should be lessened. As far as I am concerned, if this is prohibited, it will enable us to save the earth.

First of all, plastic-based products are a manufacturing process of petroleum, which is the main material for fuel. For this reason, these are produced at an extremely low cost, which contributed to widespread. For example, 9 billion tones of plastic have been produced during the time period 1950-2017. Moreover, it was 400 million tones in 2020. Therefore, statistics predict that it will double in amount by 2050 according to the rate of using plastic at the moment.

In addition, if the government banned shopping bags, it would result in a significant reduction of waste that goes to the oceans. For instance, the state of Queensland in Australia banned free plastic bags from shops in 2018. As a result of this action, the consumption of plastic drastically reduced by 40% from the same period in 2016. Hence, it is the council’s responsibility to ensure that the consumption of plastic is being diminished.

To conclude, from the arguments presented above, it is inconceivable not to understand that plastic-free is paramount to the preservation of species and nature. Despite the fact of some other individuals do not believe in sustainability, I believe that it is invaluable the method of ban these plastic-based products on behalf of environmental protection.

Sample 7:

It is irrefutable that plastic bags have become increasingly a severe threat to the environment. Conservationists and I hold the view that there should be legislated restrictions against consuming plastic bags. Apart from that, I also agree that there are other crucial regulations that should be undertaken.

To embark on, there is a common consensus that using plastic bags prone the ecosystems to hazardous consequences. In other words, if disposable plastics are dumped into the ocean, they will be entangled with marine life and food, leading to detrimental effects such as digestion issues. This marine debris frequently sticks to animals, resulting in painful diseases. Another dilemma is that plastic bags are considered non-biodegradable substances, which may take hundreds of years to decompose. Thus, if it is mixed with fertilized land, it will jeopardize the soil, dredge it, and ultimately lead to soil erosion. Hence, plastic bags devastate the ecosystem, owing to such human activities, land and marine life are prone to endangered and degradation.  

Subsequently, in my opinion, there are plenty of methods that should be adopted to curb this phenomenon. Firstly, the concerned bodies should impose immense regulations to diminish plastic bag consumption and enforce hefty taxes in case of any violation of the disposal attitudes. Secondly, citizens have a vital role in conservation activities. For example, an increasing number of brand retailers have launched beneficial schemes, acting as an activity to exhort myriads of customers to purchase accompanied by increasing awareness of conservation. While they stimulate dwellers to accumulate plastic waste for the recycling process, they can redeem it for other goods. Accordingly, there are numerous methods to overcome such a disaster.

To conclude, while I acknowledge that plastic bags have severely damaged the ecosystem when they hinder, endanger marine life and erode the soil. I concur that it should be their strict penalty against waste-discarding behaviours and unleash a campaign against consumed plastic bags.

Sample 8:

While the growth in the manufacture of plastic non-organic packs has been widely acknowledged, a category of individuals I advocate that these specific bags must be eradicated as they pose a threat to both the soil and the marine life. In the following essay, the evidence that substantiates my claims will be further scrutinized.

To begin with, chemically made bags have a detrimental impact on marine life since they are made from non-biodegradable materials. To illustrate this, when people carelessly throw plastic bags into the sea, one of the sea creatures will be inevitably hurt. An eminent example of this is Egypt where a plethora of marine creatures are endangered since they are confused about transparent bags for jellyfish and eat them; consequently, these bags linger in their stomach inflicting diseases on them or even causing their death. Thus, what can be said from this example is that if people pay no attention to this issue, one day valuable sea creatures will extinct, which will deleteriously affect countries' tourism as well as economic sectors.

Furthermore, despite the turmoil, plastic bags have a negative influence on the fertility of the soil. This is because, if these carcinogenic bags are buried in fertile soils, they will impede the penetration of plants' roots deeper into their desired destination. Moreover, they also release hazardous chemicals that change the composition of healthy soils. For instance, as per the recommendations of a study commissioned by the World Health Organization, they affirmed that by 2030 the agricultural lands will be immensely afflicted by the effect of plastics and harmful chemicals released; therefore, effective initiatives to curb the use of plastic carriers ought to be conducted immediately in the foreseeable future. Hence, not only does the extensive use of plastics that the world witnesses today deleteriously affect agricultural lands, but it will also inflict national economic growth by decreasing the yield.

In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that although plastics are omnipresent as daily gadgets, I am of the belief that their detrimental influence on both the land and the sea is alarming. I discern that a pragmatic approach to mitigating this problem is by imposing laws by governments that will deter people who litter plastics in natural habitats and limit the factories that still produce them in considerable quantities.

Sample 9:

Although plastic bags are deemed to be convenient for shopping, its waste has a detrimental effect on the fauna of land and sea. Some activists think that governments should prohibit them entirely. I completely agree with their opinion, but educating the public and introducing other alternatives should be considered first.

It is undeniable that plastics have caused an immense litter problem. Firstly, land drains into the oceans have formed what is known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, which is estimated by the size of a continent of plastic rubbish. In addition, blockage of drainage systems is mostly related to plastics as it happens in Bangladesh. Furthermore, the extinction of whales and turtles is due to foraging for plastic flotsam. This is because indigestible shards of plastics fester inside their stomach causing death. As a consequence, plastic bags are regarded as a salient source of pollution.

Governments should take some viable steps to mitigate wastage. Some introduced safety net to collect plastics lest blocking the pipes nor polluting the water. Raising awareness campaigns to disseminate information over the implication of plastic bags on the environment. Moreover, encourage the public to cut down on using disposable bags by introducing versatile reusable bags. Some stores as Aldie’s store chains in Europe are offering cashback credits for not using plastic bags. Finally, municipalities should help to recycle by distributing recycle bins for plastics. Thus, if governments and citizens implemented the concept of “reuse, reduce, and recycle”, the swift deterioration in animal life and the environment would be impeded.

In conclusion, I would argue that plastic bags litters pose a threat to the environment. If authorities teach the public to deter them using plastics and spur them to recycle, swift outcomes would be reaped.

Sample 10:

Environmental problems nowadays are being a one the most important issues which requires a prompt action. Finding the most appropriate bag for carrying daily needs is one of them. According to some people plastic bag option, as far as has negative impact on an environment, should be banned. I'm strongly advocating this idea, since the scale of potential problems is enormously large.

Using the plastic bags on a daily basis is considered to have a negative effect, since it's capable to be decomposed into a toxic component. This element, in turn, are being accumulated by soil or eaten by animals. As a result of which soils became toxicated and unfruitful while the animals either are being poisoned and eventually dead. It affects not only an environment, but also domestic economy, due to the lack of productive land, people become an unemployed and struggle to provide their family. There are a lot of examples out there where the water bodies are being polluted with these plastic bags. Thus, the negative aspects of using it lays foundation for accepting proposed suggestion.

On the other hand, plastic bags are the most suitable one from the perspective of the cost of its production. The plastic resources are in an enormous amount, and the process of it manufacturing is less expensive in comparison with the other options, such as glass or metal. Furthermore, the plastics are recyclable and its procession even less capital-intensive. Additionally, negative effects of plastic bags, mentioned earlier, might be handled with the right approach, so it's only concerning the measures taken after its usage.

To conclude, using plastic bags can have a negative effect on our environment and be a good choice in terms of its cost production. In my opinion, the damage which comes from the usage of plastic bags despite the measures is being taken still will remain, so finding the replacement for it would be the best decision.