2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án (Phần 13)

Sample 1:

In today's world, the ability to create films is no longer monopolized by large corporations, thanks to the accessibility afforded by digital technology. While some argue that this shift may have adverse effects, I firmly believe it should be viewed as a positive development.

Admittedly, there are significant drawbacks to the democratization of film production, the most prominent being a potential decline in product quality. When anyone can produce films, there is a lack of stringent selection or screening processes seen with professional companies. This can result in the proliferation of low-quality films, lacking in timeliness or professionalism, ultimately disappointing audiences and tarnishing the industry's reputation. Additionally, independent film production can lead to copyright and intellectual property management issues. Without oversight from large production companies, managing these aspects becomes challenging, potentially resulting in copyright infringement, legal disputes, or ethical violations, eroding trust within the industry.

However, despite these drawbacks, the benefits outweigh the concerns. Firstly, it brings diversity and unique creativity to the film industry. With individuals and independent groups contributing, each brings a distinct perspective, fostering a range of works that reflect society's multidimensionality. This diversity enriches audiences' experiences, broadening their understanding of the world. Secondly, the widespread use of digital technology in film production provides equal opportunities and wide access for everyone. Removing financial and technical barriers allows individuals and groups with limited resources to express themselves and share their stories, fostering development and creativity in the industry.

In conclusion, while challenges such as quality concerns and copyright issues exist, the democratization of film production should be celebrated for fostering creativity and providing equal opportunities and access for all.

Sample 2:

Thanks to the advancement of digital technology, it is now possible for almost anyone to make a film. Personally, I think this is a positive development, and will discuss the issue in the following essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Besides being beneficial for those seeking creative expression, this development is also positive in other ways. In the past couple of decades, Hollywood movies have become repetitive and boring for many people, and thanks to the development of technology, many creative directors and film-makers who may not have been able to produce their films or release them to the mainstream public are now able to thanks to the internet and digital technology. This has allowed for a greater diversity of films and videos for people to see. And finally, technology has now allowed people to create documentaries about important issues in society and publish them online to inform people about pressing issues, such as the environment. In the past, what films and documentaries people were able to see was limited to what was produced by large film producing companies, whose main concerns were making profits.

In conclusion, although there may be some minor drawbacks of this development, they are far outweighed by the benefits that it brings.

Sample 3:

Small firms are gradually being recognized for the films they produce as technological advancement becomes more significant. In my opinion, this development could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.

On the one hand, the ease with which films can be created these days brings certain benefits to both the film industry and society. First, since an increasing number of filmmakers are able to make movies with the help of digital technology, it brings more diversity and novelty to the movie market. A level playing field, hence, would be created to provide either small filmmakers or movie tycoons with equal opportunities. In fact, more and more Oscars and Cannes have been awarded to a myriad of low-budget producers. Second, the rise in film production creates more jobs, reducing unemployment. For example, the proliferation of film production requires an abundance of actors, actresses and film technicians.

On the other hand, audiences might be burdened with some drawbacks of this digital development, specifically the content and quality of the movies. Unlike cellulose films, films which are recorded on computers and distributed through the Internet seem hard to censor. Viewers, consequently, may be bombarded with a wide range of low-quality movies. Moreover, with the ease of producing films, there is a higher chance of movies containing offensive scenes, thereby accidentally causing certain groups of people to become victims of social criticism. The LGBTQ+ community is transformed into antagonists in some Indian Bollywood productions.

In conclusion, as digital equipment is widely accessible, I believe there will be a variety of equal opportunities for small and big film producers, and the unemployment rate in a country would decrease. However, the ever-rising offensive content and the downturn in movie quality are considered as two main problems arising from the development.

Sample 4:

Due to the progress in digital technology, nearly everyone can now engage in filmmaking. In my opinion, this constitutes a favorable advancement, which I will elaborate on in the subsequent essay.

Firstly, with the advancement of personal electronic devices, such as smartphones, computers, and digital cameras, making films is now reasonably simple for many people. This advancement has therefore allowed film-making to become a hobby and creative outlet for many people around the world. There are even many apps available these days that allow people to shoot and edit short films on their smartphones, and then upload the content to social media and other platforms for people to see. Secondly, producing films is not only a hobby for some people, but also a passion and a career goal. Now, with such technology available, even those who do not have the opportunity to formally study filmography at university, or those with a natural talent for film-making are able to follow their dreams.

Furthermore, apart from benefiting those in search of artistic expression, this progression also yields positive outcomes in various aspects. Over the past few decades, Hollywood productions have grown repetitive and monotonous to many viewers. However, thanks to technological advancements, numerous creative directors and filmmakers who might have previously struggled to produce or distribute their works to a wider audience can now do so through the internet and digital platforms. Consequently, there is now a wider array of films and videos available for consumption. Moreover, technology enables individuals to create documentaries addressing crucial societal issues and share them online, thereby raising awareness on pressing matters such as environmental concerns. Previously, access to films and documentaries was largely restricted to productions by major studios primarily driven by profit motives.

To summarize, while there may exist minor drawbacks associated with this trend, its benefits far outweigh them.

Sample 5:

It is an inevitable and irreversible trend, nowadays, the movie industry has brought large impact on societies across the globe. It is observed that not only giant enterprises are making movies today but also anyone who can access digital technology can make motion pictures. It could be regarded as a progressive approach; the reasons for which are the advent of technology and quality production at an affordable cost.

The foremost aspect to be considered in this context is that a wide range of talented artistes can make spectacular movies. To elaborate, with the advent of modern technologies people can utilize varieties of gadgets and software applications to make movies, even if they are not well- equipped with modern high-cost gadgets. Talented film aspirants have been making short films by the use of simple low-cost gadgets. This is an ideal example in this regard. The contributions, as a consequence, to the film industry around the world are likely to be increased by the use of digital technology by unreputed talented artistes and artists.

Another notable factor is that the quality and standard of films that are made with the help of modern digital technology is unparallel compared to the films which are produced from traditional way and technology. To make it clear, people are adaptive with respect to the changing paradigm shift, and they would always like to watch modern film making rather than the traditional way of making movies. To cite an example, films that are made with the help of digital technology have collected huge amounts of money since such blockbusters are widely accepted by the audience around the world. Films that are made, as such, with the help of digital technology have excellent standards and are widely accepted.

Overall, having analysed the positive aspects of trend, it appears to me, in all likelihood, that not a huge number of talented artists can make films but also the standard of films production can be improved by using digital technology in movie production. Had digital technology become more popular, it would have produced an inexplicable revolution in the entertainment industry.

Sample 6:

The democratisation of film has led to greater opportunity as well as fears as to the future of filmmaking. In my opinion, this is a largely positive development as it opens up the medium for a more diverse range of socieconomic voices.

The main reason that film purists resist the digital revolution is it brings down the quality of films. A good example of this is when digital film first burst onto the scene and started to replace film around the turn of the century. The initial complaints from viewers were that the film looks better and digitally shot movies have a cheap aesthetic akin to a soap opera. As digital film has proliferated beyond studios looking to cut costs, it has exponentially increased the number of films made by amateurs. This naturally leads to movies with bad acting, clumsily written dialogue and poor overall production values.

Despite the admitted cons listed above, digital film has given a voice to less wealthy filmmakers who tend to be of a different class and ethnicity. There are countless examples of students who film digitally, post their video on YouTube and become internet sensations. Many of these new perspectives are outside of the predominantly white, male, heterosexual homogenity of Hollywood. It is increasingly possible for LGBT themes to surface in these shorts and for ethnic minorities around the world to break through. The most striking evidence is simply comparing the major movies made 50 years ago with the diverse range of cinema on offer today.

In conclusion, although there are drawbacks in terms of quality those are mitigated by novel themes from underrepresented demographics. Studios should pay heed and relax their control over an ever-promising industry.

Sample 7:

Unlike many years ago when cinematography was exclusive to large companies, films made by individuals using their own devices have enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years. I am of the opinion that this is more likely to have positive consequences.

 

The fact that filmmaking is increasingly more accessible has helped add variety to cinematography. Movies made by big companies, on the one hand, are restricted to a handful of themes and backgrounds, several of which are even heavily censored. On the other hand, films made by potential filmmakers, albeit amateur, transcend barriers of ethnicities and backgrounds. Around 400-500 movies are made by Hollywood every year, many of which are Americentric and revolve around superheroes, romance, thrillers and comedies. Meanwhile, with a phone sitting in our pockets and film editing applications at our disposal, that number can add up to millions, with more themes covered and a great array of settings shown.

Additionally, easy access to filming technology helps discover hidden talented people. Thanks to video-sharing platforms such as YouTube or Facebook, several unknown people have attained resounding success just by one or two short films. In Vietnam, for example, a lot of amateur movie-making teams have become overnight sensations by posting short comedies and web dramas onto their sites. Although those films are low-budget, they are well–received by the general public, and many aspiring actors, actresses, and directors are discovered and eventually shot to fame. The Sundance Film Festival, once a low-profile venue for small-budget creators, has become a media extravaganza for new talents now that more and more independent movie creators are able to make films using their own devices.

Inconclusion, my firm conviction is that the widespread popularity of amateur films thanks to the advent of technology is a welcome trend, for it adds spices to the film industry and promotes aspiring individuals wishing to pursue professional film careers.

Sample 8:

The contemporary era is an era of modernization. In the past, due to the lack of technological progress, only large production companies could make films. However, this is no longer the case in the modern world. Small business firms or even individuals can also produce films. In my opinion, this is a positive development both for the country and for the trainees. Therefore, I will explain the positive effects of this modern phenomenon in the following essay.

To commence with, the expansion encourages the creation of new companies. To be more specific, more talented teenagers are willing to start their own field, thus avoiding the elite leaving the countries and hence boosting the national economy as a thriving film industry can boost a country's position in the international market. Moreover, the film is an indicator of public morality. If film production becomes active, the social morale of the nation will improve. For example, the popularity of Hollywood film companies not only better entertains locals in America, but also encourages foreign immigration.

Furthermore, the growth in the number of small film studios is expected to reduce the unemployment rate in the country. For example, unemployed people can start a film directing business if they are interested in acting. In addition, it gives more opportunities for young actors and actresses to express themselves on the screen. On the other hand, cinema is seen as an art form and entertainment. With the positive development of the film industry, the culture and traditions will be strengthened and thus provide the best national rating in the world.

To conclude, the evolution of the film industry could nurture more elites and young talented teenagers to participate in captivating films, which could then reduce unemployment and boost social morality and the nation's economic market. Therefore, this new trend is increasingly recommended as a positive achievement.

Sample 1:

The idea of investing government funds in placing more works of art in towns and cities to enhance their appeal is a topic that prompts varying opinions. While there are merits to this proposal, I still strongly disagree with this suggestion.

Advocates of this notion argue that art installations in public spaces can significantly contribute to the aesthetics and cultural richness of towns and cities. They may well argue that such initiatives can create visually pleasing environments, possibly fostering a sense of community and attracting tourists. Furthermore, public art can serve asc, heritage, and values, promoting a sense of pride among residents. This can be seen in Vietnam where several sculptures of heroes and historical figures are displayed in squares or roundabouts so that their citizens can remember the contributions made by those people.

Nevertheless, I am firmly against this policy for reasons related to the deterioration of artworks and the presence of more pressing issues. Regarding the former, exposure to harsh weather elements like rain, snow, and sunlight can cause fading, corrosion, or other forms of damage to the artworks, thereby reducing its aesthetic appeal. This issue may be exacerbated due to acts of vandalism or graffiti on these installations which can significantly diminish the visual appeal and overall impact of art pieces. Another argument is that there are more pressing issues that demand government attention and financial resources. Focusing on art installations might be seen as a luxury expenditure rather than addressing the immediate needs of the population.

In conclusion, while the idea of enhancing towns and cities with more art installations might seem appealing at first glance, it may not be the most prudent way for governments to allocate limited resources.

Sample 2:

The proposal to utilize government funds for the incorporation of artworks such as paintings and statues in urban areas, with the aim of augmenting their allure, has gained support in recent years. While I recognize the underlying rationale of this perspective, I argue that other facets of urban development should take precedence over enhancing the attractiveness of these areas.

Indeed, there are valid reasons to advocate for government-sponsored art in cities. Artistic installations in public spaces can dramatically transform the aesthetic and cultural landscape of an area. They serve as symbols of cultural identity, reflecting the history and values of the community. Art in public spaces also provides accessibility to cultural experiences for a broader demographic, breaking down the barriers of traditional art galleries and museums. Cities like Barcelona, adorned with Gaudí's architectural masterpieces, exemplify how art can become a cornerstone of urban identity and appeal, drawing tourists and locals alike.

However, the appeal of urban areas relies on more than just aesthetic enhancements. Crucial aspects like infrastructure, green spaces, and public services play a pivotal role in making cities livable and attractive. Efficient public transportation systems, well-maintained parks, and quality public services are fundamental to the daily lives of residents and can significantly impact a city's appeal. For instance, the attractiveness of cities like Vienna and Copenhagen is not just thanks to their artistic heritage but also their emphasis on high-quality public services and sustainable urban planning. Therefore, while art can enrich urban spaces, the allocation of government funds should prioritize these essential elements that directly impact the quality of life and functionality of a city.

To conclude, although the integration of art in urban spaces has its merits, I maintain that government funding should be more strategically directed towards improving fundamental urban infrastructure and services. These elements are crucial in enhancing the overall attractiveness and livability of towns and cities, far beyond the aesthetic contributions of art alone.

Sample 3:

Some people suggest that in order to improve the quality of life in cities, more state budget should be spent erecting monuments and providing paintings. However, in my opinion, this does not seem to be a practical idea.

First and foremost, the construction of monuments and statues occupies not only significant financial resources but also large quantities of land. Paintings, while perhaps not taking up much space, demand frequent preservation from deterioration due to natural damage. Offering more works of art is an interesting idea to help promote the living space inside cities, but not at any cost, especially when urban land funds are becoming increasingly scarce. Meanwhile, to enrich the cultural and spiritual life of a city, there are other feasible and more long-term measures, including developing sport centers, museums, libraries, and bookstores.

Moreover, the government is also presented with other priorities, such as infrastructural, medical, and environmental issues, to name but a few. Building, maintaining, and upgrading traffic infrastructure, for instance, requires substantial allocation. The need for advanced medical centers is also enormous, particularly in the context of post-COVID health decline across the community. Formulating and implementing environmental policies is yet another urgent task, given the accelerating threat of climate change. All of these are among the pressing issues to be addressed if life quality in cities is to be enhanced.

In conclusion, although many people emphasize the need to supplement city life with more pieces of art such as statues and paintings, I rather doubt the practicality of this notion, considering, first, the resources it would require and, second, other priorities.

Sample 4:

In contemporary urban planning discussions, the idea of governments investing in public art to enhance the appeal of towns and cities is a topic of ongoing debate. While some argue that this strategy can contribute to more attractive and culturally rich urban spaces, I disagree with it for several reasons below.

On the one hand, proponents argue that public art installations can transform mundane urban environments into vibrant and aesthetically pleasing spaces, thereby attracting tourists and residents alike. For instance, cities like Barcelona and Paris have successfully integrated public art into their urban landscapes, creating open-air galleries that not only attract tourists but also provide locals with a sense of pride and cultural identity. By showcasing local artists' work or representing the city's history through sculptures, towns and cities can cultivate a unique character that resonates with both residents and visitors.

However, I argue that allocating public funds to art installations might not necessarily address the urgent needs of a community. Specifically, many towns and cities grapple with critical issues such as poor infrastructure, insufficient healthcare facilities, and limited educational resources. This makes prioritizing the creation of public art undesirable since these crucial aspects form the backbone of community development and directly impact residents’ well-being. Additionally, the subjective nature of art could make it challenging to ensure widespread public appreciation and engagement. In other words, different individuals might have diverse tastes and preferences when it comes to artistic expressions, potentially leading to a lack of consensus within the community or even a public backlash.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that governments should not invest substantially in erecting works of art in metropolitan areas as the subjective nature of art might not ensure widespread public appreciation while more pressing social concerns deserve further funding.

Sample 5:

Today, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the government should invest in art and statues supposedly to improve the quality of life in cities. In my opinion, investment in art and culture is essential to a functioning society.

It has been said that a problem with funding art paintings and statues is that it takes away money from more essential infrastructure projects. It might be argued that issues like poverty and pollution are much more urgent and affect the economy in a more profound way. For example, great wealth inequality as well as poor air quality could lead to greater crime and worsening mental health issues for those in the lower social strata. Hence, instead of focusing on art and culture, some may suggest that the money be used for creating more opportunities for disadvantaged people.

On the other hand, I argue that an appreciation for art and culture, reflected in things such as paintings and statues, is essential for a cohesive society. While bread and butter gives individuals a means to survival, art and culture could be said to provide people with meaning that extends beyond mere subsistence. Societies where people only work and are unaware of the history and culture reflected in cultural artefacts, I argue, would have no means of expressing a collective identity. Since humans can only see ourselves within a larger context, be it historically or culturally, investment in these areas is necessarily essential to well-being.

Overall, therefore, I believe that while there are economic arguments against funding art projects and statues, I believe that they give people meaning and as such are essential to a healthy society; it is thus vital that governments continue to protect these artifacts.

Sample 6:

Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life. Personally, I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.

On the one hand, public art beautifies a city. A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work. In contrast, cities that have invested heavily in public art, such as New York City, offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home. A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day. This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instills a sense of pride, but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city, both of which contribute to a vibrant city.

Nonetheless, public art has little quantifiable positive value. Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art. This art, therefore, means nothing to most locals, while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget. There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure, well-rounded healthcare systems, and modern recreational facilities. Moreover, the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms, bus stops or parks. Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.

Despite the aesthetic value of public art, government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents. There must be a degree of balance, but it should always tip more towards pragmatic concerns.

Sample 7:

It is often argued that government funding should be allocated to artworks in public spaces. While this argument seems relatively reasoned in aesthetic and social terms, I assert that this money would be more beneficially invested elsewhere.

Proponents of the given notion may rationalize that large-scale sculptures or statues can serve as decorations or even landmarks, enhancing the overall appeal of their cities or towns. As a result, they can create hotspots attracting both locals and visitors, fostering social interactions and a sense of community in the whole area. Such art pieces, nonetheless, may not accomplish these intended objectives, possibly attributable to their subjective nature. The public may not express advocacy, but even opposition, towards abstract murals or installations that challenge societal norms, making expenditures in art unnecessary and wasteful.

Under this line of reasoning, I contend that the state budget should be spent on areas more essential than art. Healthcare would be one of them because, despite its pivotal role in citizens' well-being, it may be underfunded. If received more proper funding, hospitals would mitigate overload while constructing more modern facilities and equipping sufficient medical devices, thereby contributing to better public health. Education is another area more worth the investment than public art. A large number of children, especially those in rural or mountainous areas, lack proper schooling, consequently perpetuating poverty and hindering economic growth. Hence, what the authorities should be doing to alleviate such issues is allocating sufficient resources to ensure equitable access to education for all individuals.

In conclusion, while public art potentially brings a few minor virtues to societies, I would argue that the national budget should instead be directed to more vital services including healthcare and education, facilitating a more comprehensive social development.

Sample 8:

Investing public funds in the placement of more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities is a topic that sparks debate. While some argue that this enhances the aesthetic appeal and cultural vibrancy of urban areas, I am inclined to disagree with this proposition to a certain extent.

On one hand, supporters of government spending on public art argue that it transforms cities into visually appealing and culturally rich environments. Art has the power to stimulate creativity, spark discussions, and foster a sense of community identity. For instance, cities like Barcelona, known for its public art installations by artists like Antoni Gaudí, have become global tourist attractions. The presence of such artworks can contribute to a city's unique character and attract visitors.

However, it is essential to consider the opportunity cost of allocating public funds to art projects. Towns and cities often face pressing issues such as inadequate infrastructure, education, and healthcare. Channeling funds into art installations might be perceived as a luxury when basic needs are unmet. For example, a city struggling with traffic congestion or a shortage of affordable housing might be better served by prioritizing infrastructure projects over aesthetic enhancements.

In conclusion, while the inclusion of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly contribute to cultural enrichment and tourism, governments must strike a balance. Allocating substantial funds to public art should be approached cautiously, considering the prioritization of pressing needs that directly impact the well-being of the residents. Achieving a harmonious blend of aesthetics and functionality should be the ultimate goal in enhancing the overall appeal of towns and cities.

Sample 9:

The debate on government spending in urban areas often centers around whether to prioritize artistic projects or essential infrastructure. This essay will explore the merits of investing in art to enhance city life against the imperative need for practical urban development, aiming to find a balanced approach to government expenditure.

Proponents of this perspective argue that art infuses cities with cultural vibrancy, thereby elevating the quality of life for residents. For instance, in Hanoi, the installation of murals depicting traditional Vietnamese stories has transformed mundane walls into sources of national pride and tourist attraction. These artistic endeavors not only beautify urban landscapes but also foster a sense of community and historical continuity. However, while the aesthetic and cultural merits of art are undeniable, the question of its prioritization over more pressing urban needs remains contentious.

However, I believe that the government's primary focus should be on addressing more immediate urban issues. Infrastructure improvements, for example, are critical in cities like Ho Chi Minh City, where frequent traffic congestion and inadequate public transportation systems pose daily challenges for millions. Investing in better roads, public transport, and urban planning would not only enhance the functional efficiency of cities but also contribute to the well-being of its inhabitants in a more tangible manner than art installations.

In conclusion, while the incorporation of art in urban spaces can undoubtedly enrich the cultural tapestry of a city, it is imperative that such aesthetic considerations do not overshadow the essential infrastructural developments that directly impact the daily lives of city dwellers. A balanced approach, prioritizing functional necessities while also celebrating artistic expression, would be a more prudent course of action for government spending.

Sample 10:

It is believed by some that governments should allocate funds to install more works of art, such as paintings and statues, in towns and cities to enhance their attractiveness. Although there are certain arguments against this viewpoint, I believe that such an initiative should be put into practice. 

On the one hand, opponents argue that more practical and immediate needs, such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare should receive greater allocation of the national budget, which is often limited in most countries around the world.

Obviously, these areas are vital for a country to function well and have a direct impact on the well-being and livelihood of citizens, whereas art may be considered as a kind of luxury that serves the sole purpose of enhancing the aesthetic appeal of a city. 

However, the economic benefits that public art brings to a country should not be downplayed. Sculptures or statues can turn towns and cities into vibrant and culturally rich spaces, and such aesthetically pleasing cities are more likely to not only boost tourist activities but also attract businesses and investors, thus contributing to the development of the local economy and generating more employment opportunities.

In this way, the indirect economic advantages of public art can offset its initial costs and contribute to the overall prosperity of citizens’ lives.  

Moreover, public art functions as a vehicle for expressing and enriching culture. When governments integrate a variety of artistic expressions into public spaces, they actively contribute to shaping the cultural identity of a community. This exposure to a range of art forms serves as an educational and inspirational experience for residents, nurturing feelings of pride and fostering an appreciation for cultural diversity.

In conclusion, while there are reasonable concerns related to the allocation of limited resources, the benefits of public art in enhancing the cultural and economic fabric of a community are adequate compensation for the initial costs involved in setting up art projects in cities and towns. 

Sample 11:

It has long been a debatable issue whether governments should spend on the beautification of towns and cities through works of art, like statues and paintings. I agree with the given statement and in the following essay I will put forth my views in support of my argument.

Art has always been an inseparable part of our lives as it helps us express ourselves and instills happy feelings in us. Putting up statues or sculptures in open areas gives an opportunity to people to enjoy it and acts as a distraction from the monotony of everyday activities. Research has proved that appreciating art helps people relieve stress. In addition, during tough times, people need some form of art to release tension. It could be through music, dance, painting, etc. Having sculptures, statues or murals in public places gives an access to people from all strata of society to enjoy art and refresh their mind.

Moreover, installing statues in public places is not only a way to commemorate a famous historical figure, but also is an interesting way for children to learn about the history or the accomplishments of that person. India has a rich culture and history and in most of the towns and cities there are statues of famous persons or those depicting historical events. For example, in my hometown, there is a statue of Dr. B.R Ambedkar. Everyone who passes by that statue reads about him and the children are fascinated by it and know all about Dr. Ambedkar.

Another added advantage is that statues become a tourist attraction and people like to visit places which have a rich history, art and culture. This helps the local business and thus, helps make the economy of the place better. For example, the Rock Garden in Chandigarh has modern sculptures made of trash, which attracts a lot of tourists from all over the world.

No doubt, the government should focus more on other more important issues, like poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, etc. However, art should also not take a backseat and should be focused on to make the cities and the country more beautiful and attractive, for the residents and for those who visit.

In conclusion, I would reiterate that art cannot be separated from our lives and importance should be given to making a place more appealing, by installing works of art, like sculptures, statues and paintings in public places.

Sample 1:

Today, it is often argued that elaborate descriptions of criminal activities on printed newspapers and social media should be limited because of their numerous adverse effects. Personally, I disagree with this notion and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

Granted, there are several drawbacks of displaying detailed criminal information in the media. Firstly, the descriptions of brutal and serious offences could promote a strong sense of insecurity and anxiety among the general public in society. Consequently, many people may feel disinclined to socialize with others around or help strangers in need, especially those they think are potentially suspicious, which may render the community less close-knit and more cold-hearted. Secondly, elaborate criminal descriptions could adversely affect offenders to a great extent even after successful rehabilitation programs. This is because the human mind is capable of remembering detailed information of criminal acts people abhor, which possibly prompts them to still harshly discriminate against ex-offenders.

Nevertheless, I would argue that elaborately provided criminal descriptions are of huge benefit to the tightening of social security. On being publicly shown to the masses, these depictions can inform citizens of meticulous or intricate forms of illegal acts. Therefore, people will be encouraged to take more precautions or equip themselves with necessary tools to avoid such undesirable situations. For instance, thanks to the detailed reports of widespread crimes over the past few years, some Vietnamese households have already begun to install surveillance cameras and alarm bells which can timely alert these families to cases of thefts. Without these careful criminal descriptions, they might have been unable to take such appropriate measures to prevent serious offences.

In conclusion, despite the view that restrictions on showing detailed criminal descriptions in the media should be imposed, it is my firm conviction that this type of information would prove valuable to social security in the long term.

Sample 2:

There is a school of thought that believes the media content involving meticulous description of crime could have negative impacts and so it should be limited. From my point of view. I agree that this type of content has more drawbacks than advantages to general viewers.

There are some valid reasons why some accept the presence of criminal content in the media. One proposition is that this type of information could be educational regarding one's security and safety. News concerning crimes or true crime documentaries could educate everyone about criminals' minds and the typical ways a crime is committed, which could help people to be more alert if they ever encounter such dangerous situations. However. these kinds of information could be delivered via a more standardized and textual way rather than gruesome images which could possibly be traumatizing to some.

I would opine that media censorship on meticulous criminal accounts is necessary for the well-being and security of society. Detailed descriptions of unlawful conduct via mass media could unintentionally encourage law-breaking by giving demonstrations or instructions to potential law offenders on how to commit a crime. In many mass shooting cases in the U.S., it is common that the suspects have high exposure to uncensored violent and criminal content. Another justification is this type of information may be triggering to the public. Fear and anxiety could easily be spread within the society when citizens may consider their community unsafe as too many cruel acts are reported.

All things considered, while some kind of criminal content is essential for educational purposes, a meticulous description of law-breaking acts could pose potential hazards to our safety. Thus, it is reasonable that this type of content should be subject to censorship and be closely regulated.

Sample 3:

The advent of diverse multimedia platforms has facilitated the widespread dissemination of detailed information about crimes, including graphic depictions and images, which are readily available to audiences. However, this trend has ignited debates regarding the potential hazards of such content, leading to calls for restrictions. I firmly concur that the drawbacks of this type of content outweigh the benefits.

Access to comprehensive portrayals of crime can indeed offer valuable insights into criminal behaviour and spur individuals to take preventive measures. For example, revealing a serial killer's modus operandi could assist law enforcement in suspect identification and prevention of further incidents, while also enabling the public to adopt protective measures. However, it's crucial to consider the potential psychological ramifications for the public. Instead of graphic depictions, standardised and written methods may serve as a more effective and less distressing approach for raising awareness.

There are, however, profound drawbacks associated with the dissemination of graphic crime content that cannot be overlooked. One of the primary concerns is the potential to induce unnecessary fear and anxiety among the audience. Graphic details of crimes, when widely circulated, can lead to a sense of panic and apprehension in communities, regardless of the low probability of similar crimes occurring in their vicinity. This can result in increased stress levels, decreased sense of safety, and harmful vigilantism. Furthermore, the sensationalisation or over-representation of certain crimes in media can reinforce negative stereotypes about specific groups of people, such as racial or ethnic minorities. This can lead to serious repercussions for these groups, including increased discrimination, harassment, and even violence. For instance, media coverage that disproportionately emphasises the race or ethnicity of a criminal can fuel prejudice and discrimination against members of that group.

In conclusion, while it is critical for the public to stay informed about crime trends and safety measures, the distribution of detailed crime information should be handled responsibly. It should consider potential psychological impacts on viewers and avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. In this way, we can balance the need for public safety information with the need to maintain societal harmony and individual psychological well-being.

Sample 4:

The detailed depiction of criminal activities in newspapers and on television has sparked a debate regarding its potential negative influences. I totally agree that such information should be restricted in the media due to its detrimental effects on viewers, particularly vulnerable youths, and the way it aids potential criminals.

One major reason to support the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions is that they can encourage viewers, especially impressionable youngsters, to violate the law. Teenagers, driven by curiosity and the desire to make an impression, might replicate crimes they see detailed in the media. Their vulnerable mentality and lack of experience make them susceptible to such influences. For example, in 2017, a 13-year-old boy in Ohio was arrested for attempting to create a homemade bomb after following a detailed tutorial he found online. This incident underscores how exposure to explicit crime-related content can lead to juvenile delinquency, which can become rampant if left unchecked.

Another reason is that detailed descriptions of crimes can serve as a manual for would-be criminals, complicating efforts by law enforcement to combat crime efficiently. Although the intention behind crime reporting is often to warn the public and educate them on avoiding similar situations, it can have the opposite effect. For instance, during the late 1970s, the "Son of Sam" murders in New York City received extensive media coverage. The detailed accounts of David Berkowitz's crimes potentially inspired copycat killings and hindered the police's ability to gather information and apprehend him quickly. This example highlights the unintended consequences of detailed crime reporting, which can inadvertently assist criminals in honing their methods.

In conclusion, the restriction of detailed criminal descriptions in the media is necessary to prevent the encouragement of illegal activities among young viewers and to hinder the education of potential criminals.

Sample 5:

The increased degree of freedom in media reports has allowed exposure of crime cases to come forth in a detailed manner, which certainly arouses a great deal of concern. In light of this, some people believe there should be restrictions on such information. From my perspective, I agree that censorship should be imposed on the descriptions of crime.

There are several reasons why the focus of newspapers and television on high-profile crimes should be more carefully regulated. The group most affected by the news media's coverage of violence and victimization is crime victims. This is because media coverage that is sometimes viewed as insensitive, voyeuristic, and uncaring can largely violate victims' privacy and inflict their emotional and psychological suffering. Not only that, but the general public also seldom benefits from this exposure to crime details. In fact, these descriptions can not only cause discomfort but also arouse apprehension about the impacts on young people. Besides, it is likely that potential offenders would be instigated and incited to commit crimes, since they might regard detailed media coverage as a form of guidance.

It is undeniable that the coverage of crime cases can be helpful and, in some cases, even healing.

Some would also suggest that the media have the obligation to keep the public well informed about trends in crime. Indeed, the media play a significant role in public safety by keeping citizens

apprised of essential information on criminal affairs, such as new patterns of fraud, ways to assist

victims and measures to prevent crime. However, the extent to which the media can cover about

these cases should be censored carefully by avoiding excessively detailed descriptions, so that they can accurately cover crime stories with the least amount of trauma to the victim and negative

repercussions on the public.

In conclusion, although newspapers and television need to raise the public awareness of key information on crime cases, I contend that restrictions should be imposed on excessive descriptions of details, in order to mitigate the detrimental consequences.

Sample 6:

It is argued that reporting crimes in detail in printed newspapers and on television is detrimental; therefore, it should be limited. I completely agree with this notion since it gives rise to criminal acts and people’s anxiety.

The first reason for my view that crimes should not be reported meticulously is because it encourages viewers to violate the laws. More specifically, numerous teenagers tend to follow or replicate infractions presented with detailed procedures, methods and tools mainly because they have great curiosity, or they want to make a grand impression by proving that they can be better than the person who committed the original crime. For instance, Shinochiro Azima, a 14-year-old student in Japan killed two students in 1997 by cutting off their heads after watching a documentary about an American criminal, the Zodiac Killer, who performed the same acts. As he was being interrogated, he admitted that he imitated this horrible act since he wanted to impress other people. Consequently, this may pose a threat to social stability due to growing crime rates.

Another justification for why I oppose the detailed presentation of crimes via the mass media is that members of the public’s anxiety can be triggered. This is because they may consider their community unsafe and then hesitate to connect with others as too many cruel acts are reported in the media. They would likely feel afraid of being a victim of a potential crime and constantly experience a sense of insecurity. As a result, it could lead to a loose-knit community where people are not willing to support those in need.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose the idea of presenting detailed crime reports in newspapers and television because it provokes more individuals to be driven to crime and arouses people’s apprehension. It is advisable that the details of the crimes should be completely banned to minimise its adverse impacts on viewers.

Sample 7:

The restriction of legal violation scenes shown via media channels should be introduced by the related authorities due to their detrimental impacts. From my perspective, I would express my strong opposition to that suggestion as broadcasting criminal cases through multimedia sites is beneficial in terms of educating citizens and exercising caution in dealing with serious offenses.

On the one hand, the detailed description of crimes in newspapers and on TV would be disadvantageous due to the possibility that people would commit the same criminal acts and display anxiety toward the unsafe society. Regarding the former drawback, showing the wrongdoings of criminals publicly on media networks provides individuals with a clear understanding of how the infringement was conducted, from which they may learn and follow. As a consequence, there are high chances that those people, especially youngsters, would become potential offenders in the future. Not to mention that by televising a myriad of violation occurrences, mental health problems would experience a drastic increase since citizens are prone to develop anxiety toward an unsecured society.

On the other hand, broadcasting more crime scenes on social media websites can be considered a means of education and caution for people. Chief among these is that broadcasting more violations of crimes in combination with their severe punishment plays a pivotal role in eradicating the intention of future offenders. Therefore, the increasing rate of the number of to-be-culprits would be significantly reduced. In addition, by exemplifying in detail the procedure of a breach, individuals would be more well-aware of the feasibility of a criminal case. Thus, they would have a tendency to prepare for approaches to avoid being victims of wrongdoings.

In conclusion, although the display of criminal scenes should be limited due to their potential impact on increasing lawbreakers' and citizens' concerns, I am of the opinion that cases of violation of law should be shown on different media sites to educate and inform people about the risk of those offenses.

Sample 8:

Some people argue that detailed criminal descriptions in newspapers and on TV have negative impacts and should be restricted. In my opinion, restricting the media from reporting on crime in detail is not the solution, and may actually have negative consequences.

Firstly, the media has a responsibility to report on events accurately and objectively, and this includes crimes. Restricting information on criminal activity may lead to misinformation, censorship, and a lack of transparency in the justice system. The media can also play an important role in holding law enforcement agencies accountable by reporting on cases that may have been mishandled or neglected. For example, some countries have implemented regulations that limit the amount of information surrounding criminal cases, including the names and photographs of suspects and victims. As a result, the public has been left with little information about ongoing criminal cases, leading to confusion and rumors about what is happening.

Secondly, the public has a right to be informed about criminal activity in their community. Access to accurate and detailed information can help citizens take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their property. It can also encourage public awareness and involvement in crime prevention efforts. For instance, in a neighborhood with a high incidence of burglaries, law enforcement may provide residents with information on how to secure their homes and property, as well as signs to look out for that may indicate suspicious activity.

In conclusion, while some may argue that detailed criminal descriptions in the media have negative impacts, I believe that the benefits of accurate and transparent reporting on crime far outweigh any potential negative consequences.

Sample 9:

Whenever we turn on TV or read a newspaper, more often than not we can read a lengthy description of atrocious crime, which has become a so-called feature of modern media. I, as one of the common readers, advocate the proposal that such reports should be strictly controlled, if not abolished.

Alarmingly, those criminal descriptions wield adverse influence on the audience, especially fragile youngsters. Due to vulnerable mentality and lack of ample experience, upon contacting violent programmes, those kids are tempted to follow suit, thus breaking the law and such juvenile delinquencies are too often to be ignored. If this trend is out of control, then more teenagers will fall victim to those evil reports.

Moreover, numerous would-be criminals can learn skills of committing crimes from similar cases, also the police find it more formidable to crack down on crimes efficiently. Although the original purpose of crime description is to warn people against offenses and teach them valuable lessons, the fact is that there, indeed, exists a discrepancy between what is desired and what is achieved. The latest research reveals that some habitual lawbreakers have access to criminal skills and even the police's detective methods from TV programmes and newspaper stories about crimes. By contrast, if we restrict strictly the programmes of tackling criminal cases, the ways employed by the police to combat crimes win be kept as the top secret, and it is out of the question to be disclosed to the public, especially those potential offenders.

Granted, criminal content, which is not a usual experience for common, can enhance. the TV rating substantially. Satisfying people's curiosity and adding varieties to choices, those programmes can always attract a larger audience. As for me, however, the overwhelming detriments have overshadowed whatever benefits.

Overall, no matter what excuse media can find for detailed criminal description, there should be a strict regulation to limit such broadcasting. Government and relevant organisations should co-operate fully, guaranteeing healthier circumstances.

Sample 1:

As the younger generations struggle to apply for jobs, they begin to wonder if holding interviews is the best way to assess candidates. I moderately agree that in some cases, interviews are not the best method.

There are many reasons why people are skeptical about using interviews to examine candidates’ qualities. Firstly, an interview does not fully reflect candidates’ abilities, especially for candidates applying to technical positions in the IT and engineering industries. For these positions, the best way to assess their abilities is through tests, such as programming tests, case studies, or teamwork sessions with other candidates. Secondly, it is hard to evaluate candidates through interviews because they can lie. Many people admitted to having lied at least once, especially when asked about their past experiences or projects. For example, many told recruiters that they significantly contributed to projects that they hardly participated in.

However, I still think that recruiters should combine interviews with other evaluations because they are still efficient. The first advantage is that the interview gives both employers and applicants a chance to see if applicants are suitable for the company’s culture. For example, employers can observe candidates’ manners, dress codes, or attitudes, whereas candidates can see how other workers are treated. Another advantage of interviews is that they are quick and easy to conduct. Most employers will spend only 30 minutes interviewing candidates before usually giving a tour around the workplace. This is also the most direct way to communicate with applicants because both parties can discuss sensitive topics that otherwise would be inappropriate to touch on, such as salary, benefits, or workplace culture.

In conclusion, I agree that for technology companies, using only interviews as an assessment during their hiring process is not sufficient. However, recruiters should not eliminate or replace interviews.

 

Sample 1:

Many parts of the world have adopted laws to curb the working hours of workers. This essay will expound on why safeguarding workers’ health is the primary aim of introducing the Working Hours Limit Act, and I contend that this is a negative development because it endangers the economy by challenging small companies operating in a competitive market.

The primary reason for limiting the working hours of employees is that it safeguards the physical and mental health of an employee.  Excessive hours of work can cause work pressure, and therefore it can lead to stress as well as physical and mental fatigue, which is likely to develop various health issues. By limiting maximum working hours, nations ensure that workers have adequate time to relax and unwind, thus promoting overall well-being. A case in point is Australia's Fair Work Act 2009. The act has enforced standards by setting provisions for maximum working hours, ensuring that employees are not subjected to long working hours that could drive them to exhaustion.

However, tight restrictions on working hours can pose a real threat to business and the economy. To commence with, businesses that require non-stop operations, for instance, transportation, healthcare, or emergency services, can face enormous challenges in providing emergency services if working hours are severely limited. Besides, industries operating in a fiercely competitive environment, it is inevitable that some companies will go out of business, resulting in an adverse impact on the economy. By way of illustration, consider a small business trying to establish itself in a cut-throat world of business may face challenges if its founders cannot dedicate adequate time to business due to the severe working hour restrictions of employees.

To conclude, although limiting working hours promotes employees’ health, I think this is a negative development because it could adversely affect the business and the economy.

Sample 2:

In response to the evolving dynamics of the modern workforce, several countries have implemented laws aimed at restricting working hours for employees. This essay will explore the reasons behind the introduction of such legislation and opine that it constitutes a positive development.

The primary motivation behind the implementation of laws limiting working hours is to safeguard the well-being and health of employees. Prolonged and excessive working hours can lead to physical and mental exhaustion, increasing the risk of stress-related illnesses, burnout, and decreased productivity. By establishing legal limits on working hours, governments seek to promote a healthier work-life balance and protect workers from exploitation by employers who may demand excessive overtime without adequate compensation. In Japan, the government introduced the "Premium Friday" initiative, encouraging companies to allow employees to leave work early on the last Friday of every month. This aimed to address overwork issues, promoting better work-life balance and reducing stress-related health issues.

I believe it is a positive development as limiting working hours can have broader societal benefits, including reducing unemployment rates and stimulating economic growth. By enforcing regulations that cap working hours, governments create opportunities for more individuals to enter the labour market, thereby spreading employment opportunities across a larger segment of the population. Additionally, shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, contributing to the growth of industries such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. As employees have more free time due to shorter working hours, they may choose to spend their leisure time travelling to new destinations, dining out at restaurants, or attending concerts and events, stimulating the tourism, entertainment, and hospitality sectors.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours for employees is a positive development that prioritises the well-being of workers and promotes a healthier work-life balance. By ensuring that individuals have sufficient time for rest, leisure, and personal pursuits, such legislation contributes to overall societal welfare and economic prosperity.

Sample 3:

There has been a drastic increase in working hours in many countries and employees have been pushed to work harder and longer without any additional incentives than their wages. Therefore, many countries have passed new laws to control and legitimate working hours. I believe that it will send a positive message to workers, lifting their morale and dedication towards work and should be considered a positive development.

There are numerous examples, all around the world, where companies are making their employees work longer than normal duty hours. This has led to severe problems including employees feeling immense pressure from their employers to meet targets and deadlines. This is one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness and stress. Therefore, some legislation is required to curb that, and those new laws that restrict working hours are aimed at achieving exactly that. 

Overall, it is a positive development, and those laws have already proved that they are immensely beneficial. Newly introduced rules have substantial impacts on workers' performance and health. These employees have become more responsible and productive. The quality of the work has also increased after applying these rules. In addition to this, people's health conditions have significantly improved. Now they have more time to spend with their family which helped them tremendously mitigate their stress and tensions.

To conclude, I believe that longer working hours have detrimental effects on employees' physical and psychological health and social life. New laws that limit working hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and more successful professional and social life.

Sample 4:

In response to increasing concerns about worker well-being, several countries have introduced laws to limit working hours for employees. These regulations aim to address a multitude of issues related to health, productivity, and quality of life. In my opinion, these laws are a positive development that significantly benefits both employees and society as a whole.

The primary motivation behind implementing laws to limit working hours is to safeguard employees' health and well-being. Extensive research has shown that prolonged working hours can lead to severe physical and mental health problems, such as chronic stress, burnout, cardiovascular diseases, and depression. For instance, a study conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) revealed that working more than 55 hours per week is associated with a higher risk of stroke and heart disease. By enforcing legal limits on working hours, governments aim to promote a healthier work-life balance, reducing the incidence of such health issues and improving overall productivity. Furthermore, these laws are designed to protect workers from exploitation. In many industries, particularly those with lower wage levels, employers may demand excessive overtime without fair compensation, leading to worker fatigue and dissatisfaction. By capping working hours, these laws ensure that employees are not overburdened and that they receive adequate rest, thereby fostering a more motivated and efficient workforce.

From an economic perspective, limiting working hours can have positive ripple effects on society. Shorter working hours can lead to increased spending on leisure activities, which stimulates sectors such as tourism, entertainment, and hospitality. Additionally, employees with more free time are likely to engage in further education or skills development, ultimately contributing to a more skilled and versatile workforce. For instance, in countries like Germany, where strict working hour regulations are in place, there is a noticeable correlation between regulated work hours and high productivity levels, as well as economic growth.

In conclusion, the introduction of laws to limit working hours is a positive development that addresses critical issues related to health, worker exploitation, and economic growth. By ensuring that employees have a balanced work-life dynamic, these laws contribute to a healthier, more motivated, and more productive society.

Sample 5:

In many countries, it is common for the state to constrain the number of hours a person can work within any given day. In my opinion, this law is designed to discourage exploitation and is decidedly positive overall.

The main reason the average workday is limited by law is that otherwise companies could take advantage of their employees. The evidence for this comes from past centuries before such laws were passed. Around the beginning of the industrial revolution, it was a common practice in European countries for individuals to work 12 to 16 hours a day. If an employee protested, then they might be fired or even physically harmed. Today, there are very few countries where corporations have the ability to make inhumane physical and mental demands on employees.

Limiting a person’s working laws is beneficial to society as it ensures workers have time for themselves. In countries where these laws do not exist or are poorly defined, there may still be instances of child labor or long working days. For example, in several East Asian countries, factory workers must live and work at their jobs with little opportunity for an outside life. In contrast, in countries with strict labor laws, a person possesses more time for family, hobbies, and friends. Free time is one way of guaranteeing a better quality of life and overall satisfaction, benefits which can have ramifications for society as a whole.

In conclusion, laws related to working conditions protect workers and for that reason are positive. It is also essential that countries enforce the laws they have passed.

Sample 6:

An increasing number of nations have enacted laws to protect average working hours. In my opinion, these laws are meant to limit exploitive practices, and they are advantageous if enforced well.

Lawmakers typically argue these reforms defend employees. Before labor laws existed, it was common for corporations to require long working days under extreme conditions. Modern stipulations that limit working hours are responding to these deeply rooted historic concerns. For example, in many developing nations, the labor laws are often not strict, leading to so-called ‘sweatshops’ where employees work long hours in dangerous environments for little pay. This mistreatment has been exposed in the media and now citizens demand better treatment. The laws therefore establish basic guidelines to prevent employees from working excessive hours.

On the whole, these laws are positive as long as they are nuanced and enforced consistently. There are many countries where such laws have been passed but in practice they are not followed, and workers have little recourse to report infractions. These laws must be strictly monitored, including preventing employers from firing employees who make complaints. Moreover, there are possible exceptions. A factory worker, for example, should never be required to work too many hours as they are likely to earn a low wage and put their health at risk. However, many white-collar workers, such as those at a start-up, may desire to work 90+ hour workweeks due to an overriding passion for a project. The law must discriminate between these dissimilar cases.

In conclusion, labor laws related to maximum working hours are meant to safeguard workers’ rights and are positive generally depending on their execution. It is important that governments propose laws they believe are enforceable and beneficial for the whole of society.

Sample 7:

Legislations restricting working hours for employees have been passed by many governments. The directive is believed to be for the benefits of relevant parties; however, I would argue that the negative effects could certainly overshadow its advantages.

To begin with, the compulsory limit which establishes a ceiling for working time can reduce work pressure on employees and prevent them from being forced to work overtime by businesses. Recent surveys show that the vast majority of respondents prefer to work fewer hours because it means they feel less exhausted, are able to spend more time with family, and focus on themselves. In addition, the possibility of increasing work efficiency also provides a basis for regulating hours of employment. As the regulation was proven to facilitate a relaxed work atmosphere, employees are more motivated and show more enthusiasm at work. This can contribute to the development of the company.

Although the proposed legislation has the potential to achieve the above impacts, the problems encountered may still outweigh them. The first issue is the costs that companies have to bear to ensure business progress in case the daily goals have not been met. The expense includes hiring more part-time employees to make up for non- labor inputs. Secondly, when workers have the same number of working hours, the number of people participating in road traffic during rush hours will increase. For example, since Mexico applied the 48- hour workweek policy, the number of vehicles on the street after work shifts has doubled, and traffic congestion has become worsened tremendously.

In conclusion, while there are some obvious merits to the hour restrictions including lessening stress and boosting productivity, it seems to me that the limitation has caused us more issues due to the national scale of its impact.

Sample 8:

Recently, some countries have brought in laws to limit working hours. I think this decision comes from wanting to protect employees’ health and rights, and it is a beneficial one in many ways.

Firstly, from my understanding, I think this development stems from wanting to improve workers’ health, especially if they’re working in an office environment. Many office workers suffer from health problems such as back and neck pains, migraines, and sleep deprivation. Overworking seems to be the common cause of these problems. By restricting working hours, employees have more time to rest, thus improving their health. Another reason why I think countries introduce this law is to protect employees from being abused by employers. For example, it is common nowadays that marketing agency employees are expected to not leave until meeting their deadlines, which means they work overtime without getting paid.

Regardless of the reason, I think that this is something to be encouraged. Firstly, limiting working hours will help improve employees’ moods as they do not have to overwork anymore. As a result, the relationship between corporations and employees improves, leading to a warmer cooperative attitude. Secondly, although it may come as a surprise, there have been studies showing that productivity is boosted by limiting working hours. These studies point out that working shorter shifts will help employees stay more focused as it does not take as much a toll on workers’ physical and mental health, hence improving productivity for the whole workplace. This is especially true for factory workers, as repetitive motions can cause drowsiness, so limiting working hours keeps their minds sharper.

In conclusion, I understand that countries introduced this law to limit working hours to protect employees’ rights and health. I think this is a beneficial development that needs to be encouraged in many more countries.

Sample 9:

Rules and regulations are made to maintain law and order. Some countries have introduced guidelines to reduce working hours for personnel. I consider reducing their stress and maintaining work life balance.

At the outset, the paradigm shift has made people ambitious and in order to earn a lot, individuals sacrifice their leisure time that they usually like to spend with their family. Thus, they escalate their stress and do overwork and reduce their productivity. Therefore, to relieve their stress, the need of curtailing the working hours is felt. Besides, it becomes a herculean task for them to maintain work life balance. They do not remain cheerful, instead they become accustomed to taking pills in order to have a sound sleep. In this way, their efficiency gets decreased, and this is a great threat to the economy of a company and to make them agile and fertile, setting a limit on working hours is necessary. For instance, it could be seen in developed nations as well as developing ones that individuals do work on vacations and lead a miserable life. They remain perplexed and gradually the knot of relationships gets loose and broken relationships make them depressed and they start to shrink the work and loose their efficiency. So, it is dispensable to let them free early.

Furthermore, it is a negative development because people become money minded, and they do not remain outgoing and valuing relationship is no longer needed for them. So, this kind of trend has adverse effects on the lives of job holders. What’s more, if a company is progressing by leaps and bounds, the whole credit goes to its staff. However, if staff is not optimist and shrinks the work then company is unable to make profit and ultimately, country will not progress owing to incapability of entrepreneurs to pay tax on time.

In conclusion, thus it is mandatory to diminish the working hours for the well-being of its employees as well as for the advancement of a company. Satisfying the needs of personnel is the first goal of a company and if they were showing remarkable performances in a specific period of time, then introduction of rules is commendable task of the governments.

Sample 10:

Nowadays, employees have been pushed to endeavour harder and longer in some developing countries. Hence, several countries have enacted laws to restrict working hours. There are numerous motives why the law is needed, which I will discuss in this essay. I believe that restricting the number of hours worked is a positive development for everyone.

One evident reason to present a law to limit working hours is to reduce the companies which set their labourers to work longer than normal duty hours. For instance, the employees obtain jobs over time to elevate their production by spending the same expenditure. However, workers are feeling immense pressure to meet targets and deadlines. Furthermore, another one of the pivotal reasons that employees are more susceptible to illness is primarily their unhealthy lifestyle. In particular, employees who do not have sufficient time to relax or sleep, which can put them at risk of suffering sanity problems, and it leads to spending more money on medical treatments.

There are also benefits to enforcing rules which have substantial impacts on workers’ performance and health. Employees are able to perform the job carefully, which helps prevent potential hazards affecting their safety and that of their surroundings. An illustration, if the employees are responsible to handle hazardous chemicals, it can be deadly if they cannot dispose of it according to the steps or procedures in the guidelines. In addition, people who cut their performance hours will have significantly improved their health conditions. For example, they have more time to stay with their families which helps them tremendously mitigate their stress.

To sum up, excessive works have detrimental effects on the workers’ physical and psychological health. Limiting work hours will bring several changes in their lifestyle that would lead them towards a better and successful life.

Sample 11:

In many countries, governments have enacted restrictions on working hours for jobholders. This essay will discuss the possible reasons why these acts came into force and suggest that this is a positive development because it reaps various benefits.

To commence with, prolonged working hours have been on the rise for many years, resulting in a growing number of employees developing health issues related to work pressure. It is also associated with the mental and social well-being of employees. Every year, long working hours lead to many early deaths from cardiac arrests and ischemic heart disease. For example, in an international study of the loss of life and health associated with working long hours, ILO and WHO joint estimate reveals that around half a million people, in 2017, died from stroke as a result of having worked at least 52 hours a week. The COVID-19 pandemic had also worsened the situation. A case in point is a study of 4.2 million employees from Latin America, Australia, and Europe in 2019, which shed light on the fact that the average working hours had risen by 52.4 minutes. Therefore, there is a justification for states to introduce laws to prohibit long working hours.

Defined working hours laws are a positive development as they prove advantageous to employees and employers. In simple words, reducing working hours helps employees devote their spare time to their family and friends, thereby establishing a healthy personal and professional life. It also enhances their performance and job loyalty which benefits employers. Apart from that, it reduces unemployment. When employees work for limited hours, the necessity of increasing employees to make up for the fewer working hours emerges, which brings down unemployment. It is, therefore, evident that legal maximum working hours is a positive development.

To recapitulate, severe health, social and psychological issues caused by indecent working hours have provoked the authority to adopt laws to limit working hours. It is a positive development as these laws confer various advantages to workers as well as employers.

Sample 12:

There are countries in the world such as the USA, Canada, Australia and many more where a person cannot work for more than 40 hours a week. In my opinion, it is a positive development. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss why this law was introduced and my arguments to support my views.

This law was mainly introduced to protect the economic rights of the workers and prevent exploitation. It is seen that in places where there is no such law, employees are exploited and instead of normally working from 9 am to 5 pm, they are made to sit in offices from 9 am to 9 pm at no extra pay. Many other benefits of this law such as improvement in the physical and mental health of the employees and better family relations automatically followed.

This law is beneficial because, in this fast-moving world of today, people have become workaholics. In order to satisfy their material desires, they forget to draw a line between work and family. If working hours are fixed, then they have enough time for their family life and leisure. Secondly, overworking leads to stress and can lead to nervous breakdown in extreme cases. People also find time for their regular exercise if working hours are fixed.

Furthermore, having a limit on working hours also helps solve the problem of unemployment. A larger number of people working for a fixed number of hours is better than a lesser number of people working more hours. What is more, it has been proved by researchers that having a limit on the working hours increases the output and productivity of employees. This could be a win-win situation for both the employer and the employee. Finally, it can be said that the chances of exploitation of employees are much less if there is a limit on the working hours.

Some people oppose this law by saying that it is an infringement of rights. They say that if a person has the ability to work more, he should be allowed to work. Sometimes a person may need more money for his personal needs, so it is unfair not to let him work more. Nonetheless, it has been seen that in countries where such laws are there, people have a better life, better working conditions, lesser degree of unemployment and better productivity of employees.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that this law was imposed for the benefit of employees and employers, and it has many advantages.

Sample 13:

Free time allows the person to step back from stress not only physically but mentally as well. Nowadays, few nations are inclining towards reducing employees’ job hours. I will discuss why this law has been established alongside the development it has brought in people’s life.

Commencing with the myriad reasons why this law has been launched. First and foremost, it has established work-life balance in people’s lives. In recent times, the majority of individuals juggle for maintaining equilibrium between home and professional life. For instance, In New Zeeland, Guardian company has adopted for four days work week and found that 78% of their employee strength is able to maintain uniformity in their work and personal life. Thus, it helps people to maintain peace between both worlds. Moreover, it boosts mental happiness among personnel as they will be able to spend additional time with their loved ones and nurture family values. Therefore, it ameliorates family bonds and reduces health issues as people will be content and stress-free.

In my opinion, it is a positive development. Primarily, it has proliferated employee’s productivity level as employees are pleased mentally so they are able to finish tasks with a clear mind. Apart from this, this approach is environmentally-friendly. Multitudes who will travel to the office will be less for a day, resulting in decreased carbon dioxide emission. Also, plastic wastage will be little for a day. Therefore, this perspective is eco-friendly.

In conclusion, curbing working hours has ample merits. However, some service base companies cannot proceed with this technique, but they should try to look for alternatives to achieve contentment among workforces.

Sample 1:

With the advancement of technology, more people are opening accounts for social media and online banking purposes. This has led to the question of whether it is beneficial to put personal information online. I think that, despite the convenience it brings, people should not put their personal information online.

On the one hand, I can understand why people would put their personal information online. Firstly, it makes signing up for accounts much more convenient for users. For example, in the past, to open up a stock account, people would have to go to a stock company and complete lots of paperwork. By providing personal information online, people save time doing these registrations. Another benefit is that this makes signing in to these accounts easier for users. Instead of choosing security questions and remembering the answer for them like in the past, nowadays, users only need to provide their phone number or email address to get verified. This feature is useful when someone is trying to sign in to a bank account during an emergency.

On the other hand, there are multiple problems with readily providing one’s personal information online. The first one is that, by doing so, the user will become a target for not just material but also identity thefts. Social media accounts are prone to be hacked. Once the thief acquires the person’s address, they can easily break into that person's house, especially with other information already posted on social media, like vacation plans. Even worse, they can impersonate the user to claim insurance. On a less serious note, when users give out their information to the social media company or the bank, there is still a slight chance that these companies will sell it to telesales people. There have been reports that some social media platforms, such as Tiktok, collect and sell user's personal information.

In conclusion, although providing personal information makes registration convenient for people, it has to be done carefully since currently, it still does more harm than good.

Sample 2:

In today’s digital era, an increasing number of people share their private details online, such as home addresses and contact numbers, for a variety of reasons including registration on social platforms and internet banking. In my opinion, despite presenting certain drawbacks, this trend is predominantly a positive evolution in our increasingly digital society.

The primary concern with this trend is the heightened risk of privacy breaches and identity theft. As personal information becomes increasingly accessible online, it creates opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit such data. A notable example is the 2016 incident in Vietnam, where the personal information of 50 million Vietnamese citizens was allegedly leaked online, including sensitive details like names, addresses, and identity card numbers. This breach not only highlighted the vulnerabilities associated with online data sharing but also emphasized the urgent need for stronger cybersecurity measures and more cautious online behavior, linking directly to the critical importance of protecting personal data in the digital age.

On the flip side, the digitization of personal information offers more considerable benefits. One of these is the enhanced convenience of everyday transactions and communications. For instance, the rise of online banking in Vietnam, with platforms such as Vietcombank and Techcombank, has transformed how Vietnamese individuals manage their finances, enabling instant transfers and bill payments without visiting a bank branch. Additionally, social networking sites, such as Zalo and Facebook, have overcome geographical barriers, allowing people to maintain and develop relationships irrespective of their physical location. These benefits not only simplify logistical aspects of life but also enrich social interactions, illustrating the positive aspects of sharing personal information online.

In conclusion, while sharing personal details online carries certain risks, particularly highlighted by the Vietnamese example of data breaches, I am convinced that the overall impact of this trend is overwhelmingly positive. It represents a significant leap towards making daily routines more efficient and enhancing social connections, encapsulating the essence of this digital evolution as a beneficial step in leveraging technology to improve our lives.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly common for people to provide their personal details online. Although this practice might facilitate a better user experience, I believe the trend is negative as people will likely be vulnerable to cyber-crimes.

On the one hand, updating personal information online facilitates a superior experience for online shoppers. By associating personal details with exclusive accounts, consumers can make more convenient online purchases. This is clearly exemplified when people shop on e-commerce platforms such as Amazon or Facebook. Because their identity information has already been synchronized with their sign-in accounts during an initial by the first registration, customers can skip the time-consuming data entry and transfer immediately to the final step of making a transaction. Thus, the buying process is expedited, fostering an overall convenient customer experience.

On the other hand, posting personal data on the Internet makes users potentially susceptible to criminal activities. The private information shared online including one’s names, addresses or social security numbers can be exploited for illicit purposes such as financial fraud. For instance, a hacker known as “Hieu PC’ in Vietnam ran one of the Internet’s most profitable and popular services for selling stolen identity records. He utilized his social engineering degree to exploit a wealth of vulnerable consumer data, stealing thousands a sheer volume of social security numbers and reselling them on an anonymous broker’s online platform. This led to a large number of retired workers in the United States losing million-dollar pensions to a sophisticated online hacking scheme.

In conclusion, in spite of some relatively minor conveniences, registering personal details online is a negative development considering the risk of online fraud. In my opinion, governments should establish additional privacy regulations for online shopping firms so as to mitigate security risks and better secure personal identity information.

Sample 4:

It has become common for people to put their personal data online for communicational and financial purposes. In my opinion, the benefits offered by this trend could hardly justify the potential drawbacks.

Admittedly, the trend in question presents certain benefits, chiefly in terms of businesses and services. First, from a consumer’s standpoint, having their personal information registered on social networking and digital banking platforms allows an increased exposure to various service offerings. This is because advanced data technologies enable consumers’ needs to be quickly identified based on their personal input. Thus, a list of potentially suitable service providers can be derived therefrom. Second, from a business’ perspective, a database of consumers’ information may help businesses gain insight into the market situation and make better decisions for their operations. For example, banks often analyse trends in consumer shopping behaviour, thereby devising more targeted marketing schemes which can yield higher sales rates.

However, users may very well find themselves in serious predicaments from putting personal information online. The consequences that may arise from a breach of cyber security can be catastrophic. As has often been the case on social networking sites, unaware users can fall prey to hackers by clicking on links that compromise their security settings. As such, users’ personal data may be extracted and used against their will, for blackmail, property fraud or misinformation. Moreover, there are chances that greedy businesses will commoditize users’ data and sell them to other corporations and industries for a profit. With their personal information in the wrong hands, users may have their needs, tastes and thoughts manipulated by dubious organizations.

In conclusion, despite its conveniences, the practice of putting personal information online proves to be more of a negative trend. The problems resulting from this practice can be more complicated and far-reaching than expected, especially in today’s digital age.

Sample 5:

Today, one of the most common occurrences in the digital world is the availability of personal information online, with people providing their details for daily activities such as social networking or banking. Despite some positivity associated with it, I believe this development is largely negative.

The increased presence of personal information online has produced some benefits. Thanks to this development, it has become easier for people to connect with each other, or in some cases, reconnect. An adult, for example, can find somebody he went to high school with by searching for their name on a popular social media platform. Then, they can catch up with one another and stay in touch after a long period of no contact. Meanwhile, in certain services, it is possible to provide higher degrees of convenience by having more personal information available online. When users have verified their own accounts using private details, banks and e-commerce sites can quickly facilitate transactions, enhancing customer satisfaction and generating profit faster. Indeed, the advantages to having personal information present digitally should not be disputed.

However, the negative implications associated with this tendency are potentially severe. For one, it puts people at risk of having their information abused. This can lead to a sense of insecurity, as there have been individual cases of private details being leaked to malicious parties, who proceed to use the victim’s identity for fraudulent schemes. Another privacy-related concern has to do with the vague possibility of withdrawing personal details from online platforms. Once private information is submitted, there is little guarantee aside from the holder’s word that it can be wiped from the digital world should the user request it. As a consequence, people’s digital presence may end up inseparable from their real lives, providing a way to track their activities and erode their privacy.

Given these points, I believe that many people putting up their private details online is detrimental. It is therefore necessary to be cognizant of the risks associated with this decision, and even more so to take steps to protect oneself.

Sample 6:

The advent of the internet has caused a paradigm shift in how people share about themselves. Many voluntarily put online personal details for networking purposes or financial reasons. This essay will explain how the trend can be more harmful than it is helpful.

The personal choice to post about one's information can make it easier for people to connect with one another; however, it can lead to some privacy threats. On social networking sites, it is more than easy for users to update on which school they go to, where they are working at or who they are hanging out with. Such data feeds to the algorithm which can push people who share common interests to interact with each other, thus expanding their social circle and strengthening the community. Nonetheless, if one is not aware of what they are posting online and accidentally reveals sensitive information, they could fall prey to predators. It is, unfortunately, getting increasingly prevalent to find stalkers lurking in the virtual world, collecting data on their susceptible victims. There is also an increase in the number of blackmailing activities due to lack of digital intelligence.

With data exchange, financial activities would be tremendously more convenient but also awfully more high-risk. By using online banking services, an average person could save a significant amount of time waiting in lines and filling out forms. Additionally, storing passwords along with other data on the clouds can be handy to those who have multiple accounts but a limited remembrance. In spite of that, the detrimental effects are worth being taken into consideration. Identity theft thrives on data leak incidents, where cybercriminals have access to people's identification or bank account. Ransomware poses another threat to unsuspecting users who, for example, provide their information to fraudulent websites identical to legit ones.

To sum up, people who overshare on the web run a high chance of getting themselves in trouble. This is why it is imperative to raise the public awareness on data security and enhance protection software as well as intrusion detection.

Sample 7:

Recent years have witnessed substantial advances in technology with the invention of the Internet as an epitome. An increasing number of Internet users have agreed to provide their personal information to online websites for different daily purposes. Despite the potential risks this tendency may pose, I still opine that the positive aspects are more considerable.

Invasion of privacy and cyberbullying, on the one hand, are deemed the two most major concerns when it comes to the digital age. For instance, one can be easily and constantly bothered by unwanted calls offering different goods and services since his telephone number is publicized, which not only disturbs the recipient’s daily activities but also causes unnecessary irritation, affecting work productivity. There are many other situations in which the credit card information of users has been illegally stolen, resulting in a huge amount of money loss. Another case in point is that many people, especially celebrities, can easily be bullied or harassed by hurtful or threatening comments and messages posted by anti-fans. If their home or company addresses can be found online with just a few clicks away, those people will even have to suffer from batteries in real life.

Be that as it may, the fact that the availability of information online helps facilitate various life aspects should not be ignored. First, daily activities can be carried out with more convenience. A typical example worth mentioning is the delivery service. It can be said that never have people been able to do shopping with such ease. Every purchasing activity can take place online, and buyers only have to provide their mobile number as well as address in order to get their items delivered at door. Governments have also been making use of information public on social media sites to spot and track reactionaries or dangerous criminals so that the safety of society can be ensured. Another example is that during the Covid-19 pandemic, those who evaded the quarantine protocol were all caught by authorities because they often updated their activities on Facebook.

In conclusion, although a person may be bothered or bullied by sharing their personal details online, this trend still benefits each individual and the general public to a great extent as long as the Internet and media literacy are popularized.

Sample 8:

In the contemporary digital era, the proliferation of virtual platforms has led to an increasing trend of individuals sharing personal information online for various purposes. While some people raise concerns about its potential privacy and security breaches, I believe that such an inclination substantially heightens user experience and convenience, making it a positive development.

It is undeniable that the widespread dissemination of personal information might pose significant threats to public privacy and security. Examples of data breaches and identity theft have become alarmingly common, with cybercriminals exploiting defects in online systems to gain illegal access to one’s private information such as bank account passwords. Furthermore, some technology giants are known for violating privacy rights through mass collection of user data to their own advantage. Serving as a prime example, Uber was once accused of secretly tracking the movements of its users, even after their rides, to monitor their locations in real-time without prior consent.

Although the privacy and security risks associated with sharing personal information online are apparent, I argue that these are outweighed by its significant advantages. One of them is the use of location-based services, which enhance user experience by offering relevant and timely content, such as nearby restaurants, shops, or events, that meets individual preferences and needs. Another benefit of sharing personal information online relates to personalized experiences and targeted services. Specifically, many E-commerce websites and digital marketing platforms utilize user data to deliver customized suggestions, advertisements, and promotions, all of which help enhance customer satisfaction and engagement.

In conclusion, while the sharing of personal information online carries potential risks to one’s privacy and security, it is my firm conviction that its huge contributions to user experience and satisfaction make it a positive development in current life.

Sample 9:

In the digital age, the increasing popularity of online platforms has facilitated the seamless integration of personal information into daily activities. While some argue that this trend can bring about a sense of convenience, I strongly believe that it poses more significant risks to privacy and security.

On the one hand, the trend towards sharing personal information online offers unparalleled convenience. When submitting addresses, credit card numbers, and other essential information, shoppers can easily purchase goods and services as well as conduct financial transactions at the comfort of their home. By uploading stories and pictures to Facebook or similar social platforms, individuals can interact with friends and family regardless of geographical barriers. This level of accessibility enhances efficiency and productivity, enabling people to manage their lives with unprecedented ease.

Despite this, there are greater concerns about the potential risks associated with online information sharing. The digital landscape is rife with threats such as hacking, identity theft, and data breaches, which can have devastating consequences for individuals and organizations alike. This issue is further exacerbated by the fact that submitting and saving personal data online leaves individuals vulnerable to surveillance and exploitation by both malicious actors and corporate entities. This erosion of privacy undermines trust in online systems, thereby potentially deterring users from fully engaging with digital technologies.

In conclusion, although the trend of sharing personal information online for routine activities can provide users with convenient experiences, it also exposes individuals to major risks to privacy and security. As such, I take the view that this development is more detrimental.

Sample 10:

In today's digital era, the norm of depositing personal and private details online for banking, shopping, and socializing has become ubiquitous. This essay delves into the ramifications of this phenomenon, particularly in Vietnam, and argues for its overall positive impact despite notable concerns.

The convenience of online transactions and social interactions cannot be overstated. In Vietnam, e-commerce giants like Shopee and Lazada have revolutionized consumer behavior, enabling effortless purchasing and financial transactions from anywhere. This digital accessibility is a testament to technological progress, boosting economic efficiency and fostering social connections. It offers unprecedented convenience, allowing for real-time interactions and transactions that were previously unimaginable. The ability to manage finances, shop, and socialize online has become indispensable, especially in the fast-paced, modern world where time is a precious commodity.

However, the advantages of this digital integration are not without their pitfalls. Privacy and data security emerge as significant concerns, with the risk of personal information being compromised. Despite these valid worries, the positive strides towards a more connected and efficient society are tangible. Particularly in Vietnam, the digital economy's rapid expansion is a clear indicator of the benefits. Online platforms provide vital services, reaching even the most remote areas and offering them access to broader markets and opportunities. The key lies in balancing these benefits with rigorous cybersecurity measures to mitigate risks.

In conclusion, while concerns about privacy and data security are legitimate, the advantages of sharing personal information online - enhancing convenience, economic growth, and societal connectivity - significantly outweigh the potential drawbacks. With strict cybersecurity protocols in place, the digital age's promise can be fully realized, marking a positive development in our increasingly online lives.

Sample 11:

In the contemporary digital age, with the Internet becoming an omnipresent element of daily life, a significant portion of people’s private information is shared online. This development, despite bringing about certain benefits, is an undesirable one, given its serious impacts on individuals’ privacy, finance and psychological well-being.

On the one hand, the advantages of the digitization of personal details are evident. Firstly, sharing personal information on social networks enables individuals to socialize and maintain connections with friends, family, and acquaintances. Social media platforms offer a platform for users to post updates, photos, and participate in discussions, nurturing virtual connections that may be challenging to establish through conventional methods. From a financial perspective, online disclosure of personal information enables individuals to effortlessly have access to a range of online services. For instance, online banking has become more convenient, allowing users to handle their finances, carry out transactions, and keep track of accounts from the comfort of their own homes.

On the other hand, these positive aspects pale in comparison with the more significant drawbacks that these online users have to encounter. One of the most pressing concerns is the loss of privacy, as individuals who publicly disclose sensitive details such as addresses and telephone numbers could become vulnerable to cybersecurity issues. There have been numerous reports in which cybercriminals may take advantage of personal information they have stolen for malicious purposes, which potentially leads to tarnished personal reputation and emotional distress for those concerned. Furthermore, the trend of sharing information on online platforms has become the breeding ground for the rise in identity theft. Online criminals, who may use stolen information to impersonate individuals and gain unauthorized access to one’s bank account, have provoked widespread concerns related to huge financial losses.

In conclusion, while sharing of private information could be beneficial to a certain extent, I am of the opinion that these benefits are outstripped by the drawbacks, as the convenience for social and financial activities is not an adequate compensation for the repercussions on privacy and financial security.

Sample 12:

The digitalized era has revolutionized humans' exchange of information. Personal identifying information such as banking information or phone numbers is made available on the Internet to ease the process of daily tasks. This essay will explain why this trend encompasses both positive attributes and inherent drawbacks.

To commence with, it is argued that the integration of personal information into online platforms can lead to greater efficiency and convenience. In the realm of e-commerce, for instance, many businesses take advantage of the Internet to automate their selling process. Customers can follow the shopping procedures provided by retailers on their platforms, from product research to making purchases without the need to communicate directly. This can save sellers a significant amount of time dealing with thousands of repetitive interactions daily, which can affect their productivity and ultimately profit. Similarly, when it comes to making transactions or opening up new accounts, banks can help minimize the number of steps that users have to go through by getting access to the verified information provided by them before that, providing a seamless and satisfactory customer experience.

Despite the benefits, public disclosure of sensitive data carries a high risk of identity theft. There have been numerous cases where cybercriminals utilize such clues to gain non-consensual access to users' bank accounts to commit financial fraud. Evidence for this can be witnessed in the phenomenon of stolen identity records in Vietnam in recent years, where scammers have managed to make unauthorized purchases or engage in illegal gambling under the victims' names. Another danger associated with data breach is the invasion of privacy. In many circumstances, hackers of social media accounts may blackmail their victims by threatening to publish confidential or private facts on public platforms, ultimately leading to defamation of character.

In conclusion, the debate on whether disclosing personal information online offers more opportunities or challenges is multifaceted with valid arguments from both sides. While it engenders efficiency and convenience, it can result in exploitation of users' data and make them become victims to identity theft and invasion of privacy.

Sample 13:

The advent of a digital society has led to greater vulnerability in terms of the personal information stored online. In my opinion, these associated dangers are significant but do not outweigh the benefits of a more convenient user experience.

Concerned policymakers often argue that sensitive information registered online fosters widespread fraud. The majority of individuals store some degree of information online whether it is as simple as their address and phone number or more important data such as social security numbers or banking details. Naturally, this information can be stolen. The variety of methods used to steal information, including phishing emails and actual hacking of websites, pose challenges for law enforcement and can lead to crimes such as identity theft. These novel vulnerabilities that all consumers must become aware of are likely to remain a permanent fixture of online life.

Nonetheless, the above instances are rare and storing information online allows for greater ease of access. The best evidence for this is that the vast majority of individuals have decided to store personal information online despite growing cognizance of the risks. For example, it is an afterthought to log in to a website, accept the cookies and store a username, and password. The next time the user logs in, the process only takes seconds and this small saving in terms of effort and time is justifiably meaningful in the aggregate. Moreover, in the case of online market trading platforms and banking websites, consumers are willing to divulge more confidential information to enjoy the conveniences of conducting transactions faster.

In conclusion, the tradeoffs associated with storing important data online do not make it a negative on the whole. Consumers, corporations, and governments must take steps to ensure safety, while being mindful that saving time and effort are two of the more fundamental human priorities.

Sample 14:

The number of netizens uploading their personal details for various daily activities has been on the rise recently. I believe this trend is largely positive given the convenience and improved service experience it offers despite the risk of scams.

The foremost rationale for why I support people keeping private information online for daily purposes is the enhanced comfort. Many web browsers have enabled auto-fills that can automatically complete forms by using users’ previously loaded details, eliminating the hassle of repeatedly entering meticulous data such as credit card numbers. Furthermore, this also streamlines the process of online transactions encompassing goods purchases and hotel bookings, contributing to a greater sense of satisfaction.

Another reason for my approval of storing personal details online for everyday activities lies in the better quality of services that people receive. In reality, service providers have developed sophisticated tools that capitalise on users’ actions to customise their experience. For instance, Google Maps can produce more personalised suggestions of restaurants and cafes if users are willing to provide their home location and places of interest.

However, I acknowledge the possibility of personal details being taken advantage of by cyber criminals. It has been reported that a number of hackers have manipulated loopholes in websites’ security systems to steal their users’ details, which include banking passwords and social welfare codes. These hackers then utilised the data to steal money from the victims’ bank accounts or blackmail them. If such personal data were kept off the Internet, these instances might have been less likely.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that keeping personal details online for everyday use is mostly advantageous as individuals can benefit from heightened convenience and service quality even though the data might be vulnerable to cybercrime. That is why governments should take more resolute actions such as providing greater security support for tech companies to create a safer virtual environment.

Sample 1:

It is believed that these days, thanks to various advances and breakthroughs in science and technology, we no longer need to use products from animals, such as food, clothing items or even medicine. I completely agree with this idea.

Many studies show that a plant-based diet not only provides sufficient nutrients for our body to function normally, but also helps us prevent various potential health issues such as diabetes, high blood pressure or heart attacks. My grandfather is a good case in point. He has been a vegetarian for over 60 years, and he is still in good health at the age of 80. In terms of clothing, I strongly believe that it is not necessary to sacrifice an animal’s life for a jacket or a dress. These days, artificial fur and high-quality synthesised fabric are being used to replace animals’ fur or other body parts.

Animal testing has played an essential role in the medical field. In recent years, however, with the development of technology, we can replace animal experimentations with sophisticated computer programs that could provide more accurate results. For instance, computer-based testing has been used to test the safety of new drugs or cancer treatments and has proved effective. It is, therefore, no longer necessary to use animals for new medicine testing or treatments.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that products made by killing animals such as food, clothing or medicine are no longer necessities due to the fact that they can be replaced by vegetarian food, artificial clothing materials or computer simulations.

Sample 2:

The argument over the use of animals to provide food, medicine, and clothing has been ongoing for years. Some people consider the killing of animals to produce food and other products to be unnecessary. In my view, I agree with this idea and will discuss several compelling reasons in this essay.

These days, we are faced with many public health challenges regarding poor health conditions, including cancer and heart disease, caused by excessive consumption of meat on a regular and long-term basis. Experts are calling for a change in human diets so that people can enjoy better health. Fortunately, many alternative meat products are available on the market. In fact, vegetarian diets are being favored by a growing number of people and can provide the same amount of nutrients for consumers. In particular, mushrooms and tofu contain high levels of protein, a kind of nutrient presumably only found in meat, and can therefore be used as a substitute.

Furthermore, medical experiments on animals and medicines manufactured from animals’ body parts received little endorsement in the past. Nowadays, herbs and many other types of plant-based medicines, such as ginseng, can cure many diseases, prolong human life expectancy, and aid medical practitioners in the treatment of many illnesses. More seriously, thousands of wild animals, such as tigers and minks, are killed each year, with their fur taken to produce coats and accessories for the fashion industry. There are now similar products made from plants and artificial materials that can fulfill our needs. Animals do not have to suffer for our needs anymore.

In conclusion, I think that our needs and desires do not justify the suffering of animals and animal products are no longer necessary. We can choose a different source of nourishment, medicine and clothing without any toll on wild animals.

Sample 3:

The use of animals for the provision of food, medicine and clothing has been extant for several years. However, the cruel treatment of animals and their slaughter for the purpose of human consumption has evoked the sympathy of numerous people, leading them to declare it an unnecessary practice. I agree with this viewpoint and will elaborate on this in the forthcoming paragraphs.

Firstly, it is needlessly cruel and unjust to the helpless animals to butcher them in order to fulfil our needs. Secondly, excessive consumption of meat on a regular basis can pose risks to our health. As a result, medical professionals are calling for a modification in human diets so that people can experience better health conditions. There has been widespread popularity of plant-based foods and meat substitutes are also widely available. Many people are turning to vegetarianism and veganism to help modify their diets and lifestyles, with them obtaining their protein requirements from a plant-based diet.

Furthermore, research has shown that reducing meat consumption is more conducive to the environment. Additionally, there have been reports of those involved in animal husbandry often using noxious chemical agents and medicines such as antibiotics to boost the growth and meat quality of their animals which further endangers the health of those consuming meat. As for clothing and medicine, ersatz options have been developed thanks to scientific advancement, which renders the extermination of animals futile. Lastly, alternative methods have also been developed for drug and cosmetic testing, which also makes the use of animals in such fields unnecessary.

However, arguments can be made for continuing the use of animal products. It provides a livelihood for several people and stopping animal husbandry would leave such people unemployed. Some people also require animal protein in their diet for health reasons and depriving such people would cause problems.

Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that while there may be a few reasons for utilising animal products, for the most part, their use should be discontinued as it is inhumane, and the gratification of human needs cannot be sufficient for causing such suffering to animals.

Sample 4:

The exploitation of animals has been an unavoidable aspect of human life for most of our history. We have raised and hunted animals for food, used their fur and skin for protection from the elements, and even used their body parts for their supposed medicinal benefits. However, as society advances, we need to consider our effect on other living things, and it seems that we should try to limit or even eliminate our reliance on animal products.

Like all living things, humans need a source of food and protection from the surrounding environment. When we lived as hunter-gatherers and in early agricultural societies, animals were an essential part of our survival, providing us with protein and keeping us warm. Conversely, in a modern context there is minimal need for this. We can get adequate nutrition from vegetarian sources and food scientists are developing lab-grown meat that will soon be indistinguishable from real meat. When we add in the suffering that animals experience in factory farms or in battery cages and the devastating environmental effects of intensive farming, it seems extremely difficult to justify using animals for meat and clothing.

The other major use of animals has been in medicine. Before the advent of modern medical science, people relied on traditional doctors who often used various animal parts to allegedly cure different maladies. Nevertheless, we now live in a brighter world where we not only have better alternatives, but we can demonstrate that these traditional animal-derived treatments are absolutely ineffective. Users and promoters of these types of medicine highlight the worst aspects of human nature as their stubbornness and selfishness leads to the extinction of many of the most majestic animals that have ever walked the earth.

Broadly speaking, in a historical context, the use of animals as food, clothing, and medicine seems understandable. However, in a supposedly enlightened modern society such practices highlight that many of us still think and act like we are nothing more than hairless apes.

Sample 5:

In contemporary society, it is argued that there is no necessity to use animals to make food, clothes and medicines. Personally, I totally disagree with this idea because of people’s eating habits, the assistance to people in cold areas and animals’ contribution to the medicine field.

The main reason why I do not believe that it is not necessary for people to consume animal products is that people have formed the habit of eating meat for a long time, which they find it difficult to get rid of. More specifically, human beings in ancient times started to hunt animals to feed themselves, and in modern society, they still regard meat as the main course on the dinner table. Thus, they are not likely to abandon this habit developed for centuries. Meanwhile, meat food contains some nutrients that fruits and vegetables cannot replace. If people do not absorb such elements, their health may be negatively affected.

Another reason is that clothing made of animal fur is of great importance to people dwelling in severely cold areas to withstand the cold. Although it seems that modern technology can make cold-protective coats without using animals, they may not be comfortable to wear because of the lack of good air-permeability. Fur clothes, however, are not the case.

The third reason is that scientists need to develop new medicines by conducting animal experiments. Compared with the money spent carrying out scientific research on human beings, the cost of utilising animals is much lower. Meanwhile, some animals are the key ingredients for some particular medicines, and no other artificial products can be a substitute.

In conclusion, I completely disapprove of the viewpoint that it is not essential to take advantage of animals to produce food, manufacture clothes and make drugs. This is because if animals were not used, people would not eat and wear comfortably and benefit from new medicines.

Sample 6:

Trying to live without exploiting animals for food, clothing or medicine can certainly be done nowadays, and people in the modern world seem to agree that it is not 100 percent justified to eat meat, clothe in leather, or use animals as medical research subjects. Therefore, I agree with the given statement that we can do without animal products.

To begin with, a vegetarian diet has proven to be a healthy choice. The earlier beliefs that vegetarian diet is deficient in proteins and other micronutrients, such as vitamins and proteins, have been challenged successfully. On top of that, a vegetarian diet, which is rich in fiber, prevents cancer of the colon, which is the most prevalent cancer in the West, where people mostly eat non-vegetarian food. Even the vegans, the very strict vegetarians who don’t even use animal products such as milk and eggs, have not been seen to be suffering from any malnutrition. So, we can safely spare the animals from becoming our source of such nutrition.

Talking about clothes, today pure leather shoes and garments can be easily replaced by faux leather, which is just like pure leather and only a true connoisseur can tell the difference. Such products have the added advantage of being easier on the pocket, as their initial cost is also less

and the maintenance cost is also lesser than that of pure leather products. So, even for clothing, animals can be left alone.

It is true that animals have been used for experimenting new drugs and are also the source of many medicines, but for that too today we have computer-simulated experiments, which give better results than those done on animals. Therefore, animals are not needed anymore in this field also. It is beyond argument that for this Earth to go the distance we must respect nature and its elements. We mustn’t abuse or exploit the animal kingdom because preserving those results in long term and ultimate good for mankind.

To sum up, it can be reiterated that it is definitely possible to lead a good life without depending on animal products, and so we have no right to exploit them.

Sample 7:

Animals play vital roles in the lives of humans. They help fulfill three of the most basic human needs - food, clothing and medicines, but questions about the necessity of animal products arise among several different consumer groups. Personally, I believe in the philosophy in which animals are entitled to the possession of their own existence and that their most basic interests - such as the need to avoid suffering - should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.

There are various attractive plant-based options that can substitute for products of animal origin, which could help to encourage more people to reduce consumption of these commodities. People could facilitate a variety of possible routes to developing high-quality alternatives to animal-based foods. For example, we could now produce multiple types of cultured meat, which can replace conventional meat as good sources of nutrients for humans, and we could also invest in synthetic biology for the yeast-based production of ingredients originally from animals, such as egg white and milk. At the same time, with the increased use of synthetic fibers, the use of animal sources of clothing has significantly decreased. Still, medicine is one such area of potential complication for those of us attempting to live as plant-based as possible, because the overwhelming majority of medication contains ingredients or excipients that are not vegan friendly.

In my opinion, we should address the ethical questions about our treatment of animals because they form part of the larger picture of the way society treats all living things. I believe that animals do have feelings, and that unnecessary cruelty toward them is morally wrong. Therefore, animals should no longer be viewed as property or used as food, clothing, research subjects, entertainment, or beasts of burden, for the custom of tormenting and killing of beasts will, by degrees, harden people’s minds even towards men. All in all, consumers’ growing ethical sensitivity about the products that we use could ultimately make our society less impious and more civilized.

In conclusion, I believe that there are various alternatives to animal products, and we should forgo the ruthless exploitation of animals because of ethical reasons. In my opinion, the transition from animal-based to plant-based food, medicines, and clothing production would benefit our civilization.

Sample 8:

With the advance of technology, a colossal number of animal products can be replaced by artificial or synthetic elements in the modern society. As a result, many people claim that there is no longer necessary to consume animals to produce any food, clothing, and medicines. But I personally believe such an opinion is invalid.

Under no circumstance can the animal products be replaced. First of all, the human body cannot depart from meat, since our muscles are built by absorbing the protein coming from meat. And a huge number of necessary nutritions which are crucial to maintain our whole physical system also come animal food products. Thus, without meat, there would be negative effects on our health. In addition, abandoning all the animal products will definitely curb the augment of the economy. More specifically, ifthe market does not consume the animal products anymore, animal husbandry would be totally destroyed, generating the unemployment of hundreds of thousands of farmers, then relatively, social instability would appear, and the economy would collapse. Clearly, it is irrational to forbid animal products.

However, some people argue that human beings have the obligation to stop using any animal products as technology has way developed than before so that the substitution of animal products can be easily found. Unfortunately, such advocates fail to recognize the reality that many animal products, especially some medicines, cannot be replaced. Furthermore, these people do not distinguish the concept between animal preservation and animal products consumption. In other words, abandoning animal products is not the best way to protect the animal.

In conclusion, it is to early to abandon all the animal products, regardless of the valid alternatives resulting from the advance of the technology. And accordingly, the averages should understand that rejecting any animal products does not stand for animal protection.

Sample 1:

Opinions are divided on whether the standard of living has become higher compared to the previous centuries. Despite the higher living costs, I agree that life is now better for people in most parts of the world as they receive better healthcare and education.

The last century is a period of progress regarding improvements in people's health. A century ago, many illnesses such as smallpox, malaria or money pox were deemed life-threatening. This is mostly because of the poor prevention of diseases, the limitations in medical research and treatment at that time. However, this is not the case for most people today, as new vaccines, antibiotics and other effective cures have been developed, which shields humans from many viruses and have greatly enhanced our immune system. Although the cost for these can add up and be higher than in the past, the truth is that the lives of billions of people have been saved.

The general population in this century also reap benefits from a finer education. There are more schools and universities now than a hundred years ago, including online-based ones, meaning that more children can now gain access to education with fewer financial and geographical constraints. The increasing education standards are also what makes life better in the 21st century. as innovative pedagogical methods used in both teaching and learning are being constantly tested and applied. This facilitates the knowledge and skills students possess and results in a more skilled and adaptable workforce that serves as a basis for a nation's economic prosperity. A stronger and more sustainable economy is, finally, one of the key indicators of a superior quality of life compared to the past.

In conclusion, people's wellbeing today has improved significantly due to medical advances in the last century regardless of being more costly. People around the world are also being provided with better education, which yields long-term economic benefits.

Sample 2:

It is sometimes asserted that modern citizens are experiencing elevated living standards compared with those in the past. I largely agree with this assertion considering the improvements in general economic and physical well-being even though mental health remains a concern in today’s society.

The foremost rationale for why I believe the quality of life has been improved lies in people’s enhanced physical health. This can be attributed to an increasing number of medical treatments capable of effectively curing many of the existing health problems which were not curable centuries ago. More importantly, recent research in nutrition and disease prevention has empowered people to proactively design their diets and daily regimen of exercise to ensure a healthier lifestyle.

Another aspect that I consider contributes to an increased quality of life in this century is the increased financial stability. This can be seen in the case of most Vietnamese people who have seen their income increased. Since the 2000s, the proportion of those who have middle to high income has grown remarkably as a result of economic reforms and technical advancements in this country. A growing number of people now are able to afford not only modern home appliances but also luxuries such as spa treatments or overseas travel to enrich their life experiences.

Nevertheless, I concede that a certain number of individuals might be suffering from a heightened level of stress which undermines their quality of life. Recent reports have highlighted the escalating trend of pressure in some countries, notably Japan. Many Japanese have to contend with the soaring cost of living, fierce competitiveness in the job market and other social pressure, which has reportedly led to depression and mental breakdowns being on the rise.

In conclusion, I mostly align with the observation that the overall quality of life has been enhanced in the current century due to the augmentation of people’s physical health and income despite the documented decrease in their mental well-being. That is why governments should invest more in initiatives that fundamentally address mental health problems to leverage their citizens’ level of happiness.

Sample 3:

It is undeniable that people living in the 21st century enjoy a markedly superior quality of life compared to their counterparts in previous centuries. From advancements in healthcare and technology to expanded personal freedoms and economic opportunities, the modern era has ushered in an unprecedented era of human progress and well-being.

One of the most significant factors contributing to the enhanced quality of life in the 21st century is the dramatic improvements in healthcare and life expectancy. Thanks to groundbreaking medical discoveries, widespread access to vaccines, and better sanitation, people today are far less vulnerable to debilitating and often fatal diseases that were commonplace in earlier eras. The average lifespan has increased over the decades in many parts of the world, allowing individuals to live fuller, more productive lives. Additionally, modern medicine has greatly reduced the suffering caused by chronic conditions, physical disabilities, and injuries that would have been a death sentence just a century ago. A prime example of this is that rabies, which used to be considered fatal in the past, can now be cured at an early stage.

Moreover, the modern era has also seen a remarkable expansion of economic opportunities and material comforts. The middle class has grown substantially, providing more people access to education, technology, consumer goods, and leisure activities that were the exclusive domain of the elite in centuries past. This has empowered individuals to enjoy a higher standard of living and cultivate richer, more fulfilling lives. Furthermore, women today have greater access to higher education than ever before, opening up a world of opportunities for them to chart their own course in life. Whether they choose to pursue a fulfilling career or dedicate themselves to the important role of nurturing a family, modern women enjoy the freedom to make that decision for themselves

In conclusion, considering the undeniable progress in healthcare, women freedom and economic prosperity, the overall quality of life in the present far surpasses that of previous eras.

Sample 4:

There are those who hold the opinion that individuals in the 21st century enjoy a superior quality of life compared to those living in earlier centuries. I am in complete agreement with this view, as I believe the unparalleled advancements in technology and social welfare have significantly elevated our way of living.

The first reason for this enhanced quality of life is the unprecedented progress in healthcare. Modern medical innovations have not only increased life expectancy but also improved the quality of life through effective treatments and preventive care. For example, advancements in medical imaging and minimally invasive surgery have made complex procedures safer and more accessible, drastically reducing recovery times and improving outcomes. These medical breakthroughs, unavailable in previous centuries, have provided us with a level of health and well-being that was previously unimaginable.

Moreover, the digital revolution has fundamentally transformed our daily lives, marking a significant improvement over the past centuries. The internet and smartphones have democratized access to information, connecting people across the globe and empowering them with knowledge and resources. This has led to an informed and engaged society of people, capable of making better decisions for their personal and professional lives. The convenience and efficiency brought about by these technological tools, such as online banking, e-commerce, and telecommuting, have significantly improved our standard of living, making everyday tasks more manageable and less time-consuming.

To conclude, the 21st century offers a superior quality of life, primarily thanks to groundbreaking advancements in healthcare and the transformative impact of digital technology. These developments have not only prolonged our life spans but have also enriched our daily experiences, making modern life more convenient, connected, and comfortable than ever before.

Sample 5:

Some people hold the belief that people in present-day society experience enhanced living standards in comparison with those in earlier times. In this essay, however, I will challenge this school of thought.

Granted, modern people are superior to those in the past in terms of financial status. What used to be scarce such as education has become increasingly prevalent, which leads to a myriad of employment prospects and thereby higher incomes as opposed to those living in the past mostly sticking to manual jobs. Nonetheless, such growth in the job market is not permanent given recent financial downturns, particularly the economic recession of 2008. For instance, the IT industry, which used to provide numerous career prospects for people with handsome salaries, now faces a mass layoff due to market volatility, posing a threat to the stability of many people’s lives.

Another argument in favor of modern life is that people nowadays enjoy greater comforts with the development of numerous amenities and facilities for commercial and recreational purposes. The expansion of such facilities, nevertheless, comes at the expense of nature and ultimately human wellness. This can be illustrated by how thriving tourism alters and more worryingly, destroys natural landscapes. In Vietnam, green forests and vast areas along the coast have been cleared so as to build luxury resorts and retreats catering to tourists. These activities are the main culprits in the crisis of climate change, taking a toll on humans themselves

From my perspective, in the modern era, ones would be inferior to those living in previous times regarding the mental sphere. This is because modern people are inclined to dedicate their lives to work, which deprives them of quality time with their loved ones including families and friends, and other essential values in life such as their peace of mind. This devotion is widely regarded as the primary factor of the majority of burnout cases in modern society while people in the past tended to have greater work-life balance. The hectic life coupled with the proliferation of social media tends to place significant pressure on individuals and render modern life more complicated. Indeed, in the past, people mostly cared about how to sustain a living or how to protect their families. Meanwhile, people in the 21st century have to work excessively yet still fall victim to negative peer pressure or low self-esteem as they are exposed to an “amazing” life that other people try to depict on social media.

In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that today’s people have a better quality of life compared to those living in previous decades as people of different times have distinctive challenges that might not be shared by others.

Sample 6:

It is an undeniable fact that the world has been advancing rapidly since the beginning of this century. While some argue that the former times were better, others insist that people enjoy a rather convenient lifestyle today. In my opinion, I believe that due to the evolution of technology, there has been a strong enhancement in the well-being of humans.

Firstly, having access to comprehensive healthcare systems has significantly played a key role in boosting the lifespan of humans. The revolutionary developments in the medical sciences have drastically improved health assistance in the current society. For instance, there have been several epidemics throughout history and the fatality rate for diseases such as cholera, plague, measles, and polio have been quite high. In contrast, due to the advancements in medical sciences, these diseases have been nearly eradicated from the planet. While new diseases such as COVID-19 or Monkeypox emerge occasionally, we are better prepared to tackle them efficiently with suitable scientific cures.

Secondly, the tools, gadgets and engineering available in the present is pushing the boundaries of technological breakthroughs. High-speed transportation, gadgets, devices and machines collectively contribute to the quality and convenience of life. For example, decades ago travelling from Japan to Africa would have been a challenging, weeks-long travel, in comparison to a comfortable flight which covers the same distance in just a few hours. Apart from devices and travel, the invention of the internet has truly changed the world in terms of information sharing, connectivity, communication and data access. Such scientific evolvement has resulted in unimaginable and heightened lifestyle benefits.

To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that the present-day standard of living is substantially better than the olden days. In my opinion, the progression in healthcare, engineering and communication has surpassed the previous days and has enhanced the overall life quality in the 21st century.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, people’s quality of life has tremendously improved compared to the previous centuries. The essential factors for this change are advancements in technology, improved infrastructure and various initiatives taken by the government to bring up citizens’ living standards. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement.

Admittedly, the upgraded infrastructure helps people lead a quality living. Better transportation facilities, which were enhanced through technological advancements, have reduced travelling time to a great extent and improved the connectivity between various destinations. Such conveniences were not benefited by the people who lived some decades ago. For example, in the past, people spent months on sea voyages to commute to another country, but now it takes only a few hours to reach any corner of the world thanks to the high frequency of air flights. In addition, the condition of the food is being constantly monitored by the government in order to cater better quality food to every citizen. Still, some argue that the food consumed by our ancestors was more nutritious than now.

Furthermore, the development in medical services aided people to live longer, and various threatening diseases can be easily identified and cured as a consequence of advanced technological methods and innovative devices. For instance, the fatality rate of infectious viral infections such as measles and polio was significantly higher in the previous century, however, nowadays, these are entirely eradicated from the planet. While newer diseases continue to emerge from time to time, modern medicine can cure many of them, improving humankind’s quality of life.

In conclusion, humans in the modern era are experiencing a superior aspect of life to the ones who lived in previous centuries. Undoubtedly, as technology grows, there have been constant developments in every field to make living more manageable and more pleasant for everyone.

Sample 8:

Undoubtedly, the living standard of people changed with the advancement of technology. Although it has some grave repercussions for health; however, in the high-tech era, the community has improved the quality of life than in the ancient world. I agree with this notion, and I will elucidate my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, there are enormous amenities for the masses in the modern world, but the predominant ones are the Internet and education. To elaborate, institutions and businesses are using computers to get daily experience, making work very manageable. Furthermore, society is also informed due to smartphones because the Internet is available. Apart from it, the education sector has improved since students are used to it and do not need to wait for teachers if they confront difficulties. They access knowledge from Google and other apps. For instance, yale university observed that 70% of learners are ahead of primitive time. Hence, it might lead to more independent lifestyles and education in the world.

To strengthen the further views, in the past, people lacked knowledge regarding the Internet, and growth was stagnant. To eclipse it, ancient mortals wrote letters to relatives. They waited a long time for an answer which affected communications as much as possible as there were fewer opportunities to achieve their ambitions at the proper time. To cite an example, research done by Kenyatta university shows that 20% of people in 1000 are not able to use phones and the Internet. Therefore, at that time, limited facilities to get awareness. In addition, a few traditions are still helpful now, which cannot be neglected by technology.

To conclude, although technology is fast growing which leads to a better life and facilitates, people have no option due to the fast pace of life but to agree and learn about it very fast.

Sample 9:

The assertion that the quality of life in the 21st century surpasses that of previous centuries is widely discussed. This essay will analyze both the advancements that contribute to a higher quality of life today and the challenges that might argue against this view.

Advocates of the modern era's superior quality of life point to technological innovations and medical advancements as pivotal factors. In Vietnam, access to modern healthcare and technology has dramatically increased life expectancy and reduced infant mortality rates. A typical example can be observed in the widespread use of telemedicine, which allows rural populations to consult with specialists in urban centers, thereby receiving expert care that was previously inaccessible. If these technologies were not developed, many living in remote areas would suffer from lack of proper medical care. However, this reliance on technology also leads to lifestyle diseases linked to sedentary behavior, suggesting that these advancements are not without their drawbacks.

However, I believe that while technological and medical advancements have undeniably enhanced certain aspects of life, they do not universally translate to a better quality of life for all. The rapid pace of modern life, coupled with the stress of economic and social pressures, can detract significantly from mental and emotional well-being. In Vietnam, the rise in reported cases of anxiety and depression, especially among young professionals, highlights a critical downside of 21st-century lifestyles. This contrasts sharply with past centuries, where although life was harder in material terms, social bonds and community support were stronger and life rhythms were arguably more in harmony with human needs.

In conclusion, while the 21st century has seen remarkable advancements that enhance physical well-being and provide conveniences previously unimaginable, it also presents new challenges that can impede overall quality of life. Thus, it is essential to strike a balance that allows us to benefit from modern innovations while mitigating their less desirable impacts on our lives.

Sample 10:

There is a prevailing notion that contemporary global citizens are enjoying greater living standards than their forebears. Personally, I totally concur with this statement and will offer my opinion in the following essay.

On the one hand, there are several rationales behind a common belief that the modern quality of life has either remained the same or, to some extent, diminished. Firstly, the rapid industrialization and technological progress of the 21st century have given rise to many environmental challenges such as pollution and climate change. The adverse impacts of these on public health are evident in increasing cases of chronic respiratory diseases or extreme weather events like storms and floods. Secondly, the fast-paced and demanding nature of modern life has seemingly made mental health problems more common than ever. Issues like anxiety and depression are becoming alarmingly prevalent, especially among youth, suggesting that the heightened quality of life may not be universally experienced.

On the other hand, I contend that the general population has reaped numerous benefits in terms of improved healthcare and education, leading to an overall enhanced quality of life. Regarding healthcare, previously terminal illnesses, such as tuberculosis or plague, are no longer significant threats to society thanks to extensive research and breakthroughs in medicine. This has largely contributed to longer life expectancy and enhanced overall well-being among the public. Turning to education, the advent of the Internet and other technological advancements has facilitated and diversified the learning experiences of many individuals. This means that apart from formal education at school, learners can access abundant online resources with minimal financial and geographical constraints, which helps further promote their personal development and intellectual growth.

In summary, despite the environmental concerns and mental health issues associated with modern life, it is my firm conviction that significant improvements in medical care and education have contributed to a generally higher standard of living in the 21st century.

Sample 11:

Many believe that modern society offers individuals an improved standard of living than in past centuries. I mostly agree with this opinion as people have witnessed unprecedented advancements in the realms of medicine and education; however, I acknowledge that there remains a concurrent rise in stress levels.

One valid argument for my agreement is the tremendous progress in medical science. Many breakthroughs in healthcare research have enhanced treatment modalities and increased the probability of correct diagnoses, while the invention of vaccinations and other treatments have made previously incurable diseases manageable or preventable. For example, safe techniques for kidney or heart transplantation have helped patients to prolong their lives.

To add further credence to my belief is the educational sector has also undergone remarkable improvements. Governments from around the world strive to provide universal education for their citizens alongside the advent of online platforms that enable learners to access unlimited learning resources. As citizens become more intellectually educated, they will have more chances to seek a decent job which can contribute to increased living quality.

Nonetheless, I concede that people living in today's world also face many forms of stressors. The fast-paced nature of modern life, coupled with heightened societal expectations and family pressures can negatively affect their mental well-being. For instance, stressful economic elements necessitate longer working hours or multiple occupations to cover their expensive living costs, leaving adults less time to relax or spend with loved ones. This results in an increase in cases of mental illness or even suicide in some extreme circumstances.

In conclusion, while I largely contend that the 21st century has allowed people to enjoy improved healthcare and educational opportunities, contributing significantly to the enhancement of quality of life for many, I admit that the rapid societal shift has rendered them a more stressful existence. Where possible, people should balance between caring about their mental health and fulfilling their personal goals to lead a healthier life.

Sample 12:

It is an undeniable fact that the world has been advancing rapidly since the beginning of this century. Therefore, many people opine that today our living standards are much better than those of our ancestors. This essay concurs with this statement as it has manifold reasons to substantiate it.

To embark on, people were more susceptible to different kinds of diseases in those days and casualties were high. The revolutionary development of medical science contributed to averting such threats to a great extent. For example, the fatality rate of infectious viral diseases such as measles and polio were significantly higher in the previous century; however, nowadays these are completely eradicated from the planet. While newer diseases continue to emerge from time to time, modern medicine is able to cure many of them.

In addition, the transportation facilities available these days are more versatile. They have reduced the travelling time to a great extent as well as improved the connectivity between various destinations. Likewise, home appliances have made cooking and cleaning easier. Apart from that, the role of recent communication channels remarkably contributed to making our life more comfortable. The internet, which enables us to send and receive a huge amount of data within seconds, can be considered as the finest example of the power of technology. Thus, obviously, our lives are easier and more comfortable today than in the past.

In short, the people who live in the present century are enjoying the benefits of better services in the health, transport and communication sectors. Therefore, I believe, we enjoy a better quality of life than our ancestors.

Sample 13:

Some people think that people living in the twenty-first century enjoy a better quality of life than people living in earlier centuries. I completely agree with this viewpoint since I believe that scientific and technological developments have a big influence on how people live.

First of all, thanks to advancements in medical facilities and the growing number of highly qualified healthcare experts, healthcare is now more advanced and available to a wider range of people than it was in previous centuries. For instance, people living in Vietnam's mountainous regions no longer have to travel millions of kilometers to large cities in order to receive healthcare treatment because they can now access qualified medical professionals in neighboring hospitals that have readily available medical equipment for checkups. Even highly competent physicians from large hospitals might support the challenging situations by using online calls to consult and advise the less experienced physicians in the area. 

Additionally, our ability to network and connect to each other has become richer and more convenient owing to digital technology, which is another reason why residents of the twenty-first century have a higher standard of living. In contrast to earlier eras when communication options were limited to texting and phone conversations, modern people can now connect and contact their family and friends via a variety of platforms, including online social networks and zoom calls, much more easily, quickly, and affordably, all thanks to their smartphones. 

In conclusion, I truly believe that because of developments in digital technology and healthcare, the 21st century offers a greater quality of life. Our lives have been extended by these improvements, which also enhanced our everyday experiences and made living in the modern day more comfortable, easy, and connected than ever before. 

Sample 14:

People believe that we live a better life than the people who lived in the previous century. I completely agree with the fact that we lead a better life. I will justify my opinion with examples and scenarios in this essay.

The first and the foremost thing that comes to my mind is technology. We are surrounded by technology. Our life revolves around it. We work on laptops, tablets and computers which were not available in the last century. We use mobiles to connect to our friends and family. Earlier there was no such option. People used to travel and write letters. We can connect with anyone worldwide through social media websites. I believe that technology has made our lives easier. We use the washing machine to clean clothes. It does not require physical effort which people did previously. Cooking has become easier, storing food is now just a door away. These facilities were not available to make life easier in the previous century.

Second is the medical advancement that we have gained. The world can cope up with threats and treat patients. Now there are so many treatments for people which were not available earlier. They used to fall sick and left to expire. Every village and city now has hospitals. Right treatment at the right time saves many lives nowadays.

We have also excelled in terms of transportation. Traveling now from one country to another is just a flight away. People in the previous century did not have the facilities. Now we have trains and buses traveling all over the country.

In conclusion, I believe that the 21st century has a better standard of living. We can easily cure people, travel to our dear ones and lead an easier life.

Sample 15:

With the advancement of science and technology, our life has become easier and much more comfortable. These facilities were not available to the people who lived in the previous century. Hence, I do believe that people living in the 21st century generally have a better quality of life than people who lived in the previous century. In this essay, I will discuss a few reasons justifying the statement.

If we take a look around us, we can see a world full of technology and advancement. We can see cars, bikes, TV, laptops, fridge, washing machine, flats, apartments, hospitals, flyovers and what not. All these symbolize a better standard of living. Let us consider the advancement in the field of building. There are thousands of apartments that are growing vertically. This is making more space for people with luxurious views. The roads are better constructed, and flyovers have been built to ease traffic congestion, facilitating quicker commutes home from work. These flats and apartments have facilities like Air conditioner, automated lighting system, cooking oven, fridge, swimming pool, play area etc. One does not even need to travel to avail these facilities. Previously all these were not available. People used to stay without these facilities. Not only that, but we have also had a great advancement in the field of technology. Technical giants like Apple, Microsoft, and Google have affected our lives for the last 30 years. They have everything that we need. We can stay at home and look up places in America or Australia. Technology has developed 3D, 4D and 7D movies. Previously it was played on projectors and was black and white. Now we have Virtual reality which is a miracle of technology.

I believe that technology and advancement in all other fields have made our life easier and better. So, we are definitely leading a better quality of life than the people of the previous century.

Sample 1:

Secondary school curricula often spark debates regarding their composition, with some advocating for mandatory art and music education. I firmly believe that all students should be required to study art and music during their secondary education.

Firstly, exposure to art and music fosters creativity, which is essential for personal development. Engaging in these subjects allows students to explore their creative potential, enhancing problem-solving skills and innovative thinking. For example, students who participate in art and music classes learn to approach problems from different perspectives, which can be valuable in other academic and real-life situations. Additionally, art and music education can serve as a stress relief, providing students with a healthy emotional outlet and improving their overall well-being. Studies have shown that participation in creative activities can reduce anxiety and improve mental health, which is crucial during the often-stressful teenage years.

Moreover, studying art and music can improve academic performance and social skills. Learning to play an instrument or appreciating visual art requires discipline and focus, which are transferable skills that can benefit students in other academic areas. For example, the practice and dedication needed to master an instrument or create a piece of art help students hone their time management and concentration skills, which have been proven essential in studies and exam preparation. Furthermore, art and music classes encourage collaboration and communication among peers, as these subjects often involve group projects and performances, fostering teamwork and social interaction. This collaborative environment helps students develop better interpersonal skills, which are essential for success in both academic and professional settings.

In conclusion, art and music education should be made compulsory in secondary school as it enhances creativity, reduces stress, improves academic performance, and equips students with essential skill sets.

Sample 2:

Educational curricula often prioritize subjects like math and science, but the inclusion of art and music is frequently debated. This essay evaluates whether these creative subjects should be compulsory, considering both their universal benefits and the practical challenges of such a mandate.

Mandatory art and music education in secondary schools offers significant advantages. Firstly, these subjects foster creativity, a crucial skill in today's innovation-driven economy. Studies, such as those conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts, show that students engaged in art perform better in problem-solving tasks. Secondly, arts education supports emotional development, providing a valuable outlet for expression and stress relief. The American Psychological Association highlights that students participating in arts exhibit lower levels of anxiety and depression. Lastly, early exposure to the arts can prepare students for careers in the creative industries, which are becoming an increasingly important part of the global economy.

However, implementing mandatory art and music classes across all secondary schools faces several hurdles. Diverse student interests mean that not everyone may benefit from or enjoy these subjects, potentially leading to disengagement. Moreover, the financial cost of providing universal access to quality arts education can be prohibitive for many schools, especially those already struggling with limited resources.

While the benefits of art and music education are manifold, making them compulsory for all secondary students is impractical due to the diversity of student interests and significant financial constraints. A more feasible approach would be to offer these subjects as electives, ensuring students who are interested can explore these areas without making it an obligatory part of the educational program for everyone. This compromise supports educational diversity and resource allocation, maintaining access to the arts while respecting individual preferences and institutional capabilities.

Sample 3:

The notion that art and music should be mandatory subjects in secondary school is a topic of much debate. While some argue that these creative disciplines are crucial for holistic development, others believe they should be optional to not detract from academic focus. I firmly believe that the incorporation of art and music into the secondary school curriculum is beneficial for students.

Art and music play a pivotal role in the cultivation of creativity and emotional intelligence. These subjects provide a much-needed balance to the predominantly intellectual and logical focus of traditional academic subjects. By engaging in artistic and musical endeavors, students can develop their problem-solving skills, enhance their ability to think outside the box, and foster a sense of aesthetic appreciation. Additionally, art and music can act as an outlet for self-expression and stress relief, promoting mental well-being.

Moreover, studies have shown that students who engage in the arts tend to perform better academically. This is attributed to the fact that creative activities stimulate brain areas related to learning and memory. By learning to play a musical instrument or create art, students can also learn discipline, persistence, and the reward of hard work, traits that are transferable to any field of study or career.

Opponents of mandatory art and music education argue that not all students are inclined towards these subjects and that such a requirement would be an unnecessary burden. However, the purpose of education is to produce well-rounded individuals who are exposed to a wide range of knowledge and experiences. While not all students will become artists or musicians, the skills and cultural literacy gained through the study of these subjects are invaluable.

In conclusion, requiring students to study art and music in secondary school offers a range of intellectual, emotional, and cultural benefits that extend far beyond the classroom. It equips students with essential life skills and enhances their academic and personal development. Therefore, I contend that all students should indeed partake in art and music education during their formative years in secondary school.

Sample 4:

The issue about whether all students should be required to study art and music in secondary school is one that is open for debate. Some people believe that students should take these classes. However, others think that it must be up to the student. In this essay, I will analyze both these positions and present my opinion in favour of the people who think that studying art and music should not be required in secondary school.

On the one side, studying art and music brings many benefits to the students. First of all, it extends their range of interests. Second, studying art and music helps reveal hidden talents and possibilities. In addition to these benefits, it helps a growing child develop his or her perception of the real world.

However, on the other side, studying art and music also has some negative aspects. I think a person interested in mathematics should not spend his or her precious time taking classes in art or music. For example, when I was a student a couple of years ago, I did not like attending some art classes because they were too boring for me. I wasted my time and money because I had to pay for and attend these classes. So, my point is that students should have the right to decide whether they should take classes in art and music or not. For instance, there were a couple of optional classes in music at my university. Many students took those classes, and everyone was satisfied.

To sum up, I think that studying art and music is essential for a person. However, I believe that classes in art and music must be optional because if a student is dreaming about a career as a dentist and spends all his spare time reading about the new technologies and inventions in this field, I think it is not fair to make him attend classes when he does not want to. It is like making a person sing when he is good at swimming.

Sample 5:

School subjects have been an appealing topic and have attracted much social concern in recent decades. Secondary teachers now decide that it is essential that art and music become compulsory subjects. Personally, I agree with this decision.

First and foremost, what I put my priority in is self-perfection. It cannot be denied that the requirement to attend art and music class puts students in an abundance of classes to attend. With such great number of subjects, they have to make a wise, suitable, and well-organized schedule. This leads to the formation of the time-management skill which is of great necessity in the pursuit of success. More interestingly, when being forced to get involved in art and music classes, students are given the opportunities to discover themselves. In other words, when they are exposed to these new subjects, they stand a golden chance not to develop an interest in art and music but also to find their hidden talents. As a result, students have a wider range of pastimes to choose from and possibly a new passion. By and large, participation in art and music classes are sure to create chances for students to improve and better themselves.

In the second place, personal enjoyment holds no less an important role. It is well-noted that when joining in these extra-curriculum classes, secondary students express themselves more than in regular classes. They are likely to understand each other more and more. Apparently, students are very beneficial from these classes as their relationships are tightened and nourished day by day. They are sure to stay happy. More importantly, students attending these classes are assigned many pieces to practice. The nature of art and music is that they are often difficult to master, one may do or play correctly, but not beautifully or mellifluously. Therefore, students gradually form a new characteristic - patience. With this new personality, they are bound to achieve success in their future, which adds joy to their lives. With no doubt, students need to participate in art and music classes, as they bring happiness and joy to them.

Some people might say that with all those art and music classes, there will be less time spent on schoolwork. This will easily lead to their children's study deficiency. However, that is not necessarily the case. Art and music classes often take up an insignificant amount of their time as they are carefully calculated by the schools' staffs and faculties. On top of that, this is the moment when students are allowed to stay away from and keep their mind off the tiring work. They will be then absolutely relaxed and indulged in the magical world of art and music. Now that most of their tension is released, their results won't be worsened, but better than ever.

All in all, self-completion, individual satisfaction and study efficiency are convincing reasons for my agreement. It is crucial that school faculties and teachers take my piece of writing into great consideration to make an appropriate guideline on academic subjects.

Sample 1:

The globalization of the food industry has enabled consumers to access a vast range of products from around the world in their local supermarkets. While this development has its merits with regards to the variety and supply of food products, I believe this trend is largely negative as it poses greater challenges to the environment and the local economy.

On the one hand, the availability of international food products in supermarkets provides consumers with a greater variety of choices. The presence of foreign food items allows people the chance to enjoy exotic foods that were once inaccessible, which can enhance culinary experiences and promote cultural exchange, as people are exposed to different cuisines and dietary habits. Additionally, importing food from other countries can help fill seasonal gaps in local production, ensuring a steady supply of certain food items year-round. For instance, in Vietnam, fruits such as apples and cherries, which are not typically grown locally, can still be enjoyed even when they are out of season thanks to foreign fruit import.

However, I contend that the negative implications of this trend are more substantial. First and foremost, the environmental impact of transporting food across vast distances is considerable. The carbon footprint associated with the shipping, refrigeration, and packaging of these products contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions. This is even more concerning considering the already urgent need to reduce carbon footprints worldwide. Furthermore, the prevalence of imported food can inadvertently undermine local agriculture and economies. Small-scale farmers in developing countries may struggle to compete with the lower prices of imported goods, leading to a decline in local production and economic instability in rural areas. In Vietnam, for example, the influx of cheaper imported rice from Thailand has put great pressure on local farmers, threatening their livelihoods and the sustainability of local agriculture.

In conclusion, while the prevalence of international food products in the local markets offers an increased variety and year-round availability for consumers, I assert that the negative consequences related to the environment and local economies are of greater significance. Thus, moving forward, it is crucial for governments and consumers to support local agriculture and seek more sustainable practices in food production and distribution.

Sample 2:

In recent years, food imported from various parts of the world in supermarkets has become prevalent. While some view this trend as positive, I would argue that the repercussions for local producers are negative overall.

One compelling argument in favor of the availability of globally sourced food in supermarkets is the increased variety it offers consumers. In the distant past, shoppers were limited to consuming locally grown produce, which could result in a monotonous diet lacking diversity. Nowadays, however, supermarkets provide an extensive range of fruits, vegetables, spices, and other food products from different corners of the globe. This enables consumers to explore new flavors and experience diverse culinary traditions, enriching their gastronomic experiences. For instance, in most supermarkets, one can find exotic fruits such as dragon fruit from Vietnam, mangoes from India, and avocados from Mexico. By having access to such diverse options, consumers can broaden their palate and enjoy a more varied and exciting diet.

On the other hand, the easy availability of food produced globally is detrimental for local farmers. When consumers prefer imported goods over locally grown products, it can lead to a decline in demand for local agricultural produce. Local farmers may then face financial difficulties and struggle to sustain their livelihoods. For example, in a study conducted in the United Kingdom, it was found that the demand for imported strawberries during winter had a negative impact on local strawberry farmers. Due to the availability of strawberries from warmer climates, consumers were less inclined to purchase locally grown strawberries, leading to a decline in sales for local producers. This situation not only affected the farmers’ income but also disrupted the local economy in a variety of subtle ways.

In conclusion, although the availability of food produced worldwide in supermarkets offers consumers a wider variety of food choices and experiences, the challenges to local farmers are more significant. Policymakers should promote local farming operations rather than encouraging the imported food industry.

Sample 3:

The global availability of food in supermarkets is a phenomenon that has transformed the way people shop and eat. Consumers can now purchase food produced all over the world, a development that brings both positive and negative aspects. On balance, I believe that this is a positive development due to the benefits it provides in terms of variety, quality, and economic opportunities.

Firstly, the availability of international food products in supermarkets significantly increases variety. Consumers have access to a diverse range of foods that were previously unavailable or hard to find. This enables people to enjoy different cuisines and flavors, enriching their culinary experiences. For instance, individuals in the United States can easily find French cheeses, Japanese sushi ingredients, and tropical fruits from South America. This variety not only satisfies diverse tastes but also encourages cultural exchange and understanding through food.

Secondly, access to global food products can improve the quality of diets. Supermarkets can offer a broader range of fresh produce and healthy options from around the world, providing consumers with better nutritional choices. For example, during off-seasons, importing fruits and vegetables from other countries ensures that consumers can maintain a balanced diet year-round. This constant availability of fresh produce helps combat nutritional deficiencies and promotes healthier eating habits.

However, it is important to acknowledge the negative impacts of this development. The environmental cost of transporting food over long distances is significant. The carbon footprint associated with international food trade contributes to climate change and environmental degradation. Furthermore, the emphasis on imported goods can sometimes undermine local agriculture, as consumers may prefer foreign products over locally grown produce, leading to potential economic difficulties for local farmers.

In conclusion, while the global availability of food in supermarkets presents environmental challenges, the benefits in terms of variety, quality, and economic opportunities make it a positive development overall. By promoting cultural exchange, improving dietary options, and supporting economic growth in developing countries, this trend enhances the global food landscape. However, it is crucial to find a balance by encouraging sustainable practices and supporting local agriculture to mitigate the negative impacts.

Sample 4:

In recent years, supermarkets in many nations have started offering a variety of foods sourced from across the globe. I firmly believe that this trend is a positive development due to the numerous advantages it brings.

Firstly, the availability of international food products allows consumers to access a diverse range of foods that were previously unavailable. For instance, in Northern European countries, exotic fruits such as mangoes and papayas, which are not locally grown, can now be easily purchased in supermarkets. This not only enhances the culinary experience but also promotes healthier eating habits by providing a wider selection of nutritious options.

Secondly, the importation of food products has significant economic benefits for the countries that produce them. Many tropical countries, such as Costa Rica and Vietnam, rely heavily on the export of agricultural products like bananas and coffee. By exporting these goods, these countries can boost their economies, create jobs, and improve the standard of living for their citizens.

Furthermore, the presence of international foods in supermarkets fosters cultural exchange and understanding. As people are exposed to foods from different parts of the world, they become more curious about the cultures and traditions associated with these foods. This can be seen in the growing popularity of cuisines such as Japanese sushi, Mexican tacos, and Italian pasta in various countries. Such culinary exploration promotes cultural appreciation and broadens people’s perspectives.

In conclusion, the ability to buy food produced worldwide in supermarkets is undoubtedly a positive development. It not only provides consumers with a variety of food choices and supports the economies of producing countries but also encourages cultural exchange and understanding. These benefits collectively enhance the global community and contribute to a more interconnected world.

Sample 5:

In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. I do believe that this development brings about several positive impacts, which will be discussed in this essay.

Firstly, the ability to import food from various countries is beneficial for nations that lack the necessary resources for domestic food production. For example, countries like Singapore, which have limited land due to their small size and dense urban population, face significant challenges in producing all their food domestically. In 2019, Singapore imported approximately 90% of its food, including fruits, vegetables, meat, and seafood, from countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Australia. Relying on imports can be more cost-effective than investing heavily in infrastructure and technology to support local food production.

Secondly, importing food helps countries diversify their food supply and foster good international relations. In our increasingly globalized world, nations depend on each other for trade and the exchange of goods and services. Take Japan as an example; it is an island nation with limited arable land and a population of over 125 million people. Japan relies heavily on food imports from neighboring countries like China, South Korea, and Taiwan. This reliance not only ensures a stable and varied food supply but also strengthens diplomatic and economic ties between these nations.

In conclusion, the practice of importing food from around the world is a positive development as it enables countries to overcome resource limitations and fosters global cooperation.

Sample 6:

In today’s society, the ability of consumers to buy food produced all over the world in supermarkets has sparked a debate among economists and environmentalists on a global scale. While supporters argue that this is beneficial in terms of providing diverse food options and boosting the economy, opponents are concerned about its negative impact on the environment and local agriculture. However, this essay believes that the benefits of globalizing food markets outweigh the drawbacks.

On one hand, some argue that importing food from all over the world has negative environmental impacts. Specifically, according to a study by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), transporting food over thousands of kilometers increases carbon emissions, contributing to climate change. Consequently, many environmental activists have called for reducing unnecessary food imports. Furthermore, this practice affects local agriculture as farmers cannot compete with the prices of imported food. This issue not only occurs locally but also has a global impact.

On the other hand, globalizing food markets brings numerous benefits, especially in terms of economic and cultural aspects. People can easily access a diverse range of foods from around the world, improving their diet and fostering culinary creativity. This is particularly true in large urban areas where the demand for diverse food is high. For instance, in cities like New York and London, consumers can find food from every country, creating a rich and diverse culinary landscape.

Both sides of the issue have their strengths and weaknesses. While the negative aspect of importing food includes environmental impact and challenges to local agriculture, the stronger point is the economic and cultural benefits it brings. Moreover, promoting cultural exchange through food contributes to international understanding and peace.

In conclusion, the issue of importing food from all over the world presents both advantages and disadvantages, but this essay posits that the economic and cultural benefits outweigh the negative impacts on the environment and local agriculture as discussed above. Governments and individuals should prioritize sustainable development and support local agriculture while taking advantage of the benefits from global food markets.

Sample 7:

In many countries today, supermarkets offer a vast array of food products from around the world. This global availability of food items is a positive development, providing numerous benefits such as increased variety, enhanced nutritional options, and economic advantages.

Firstly, the presence of international food products in supermarkets greatly expands the variety available to consumers. People have the opportunity to explore and enjoy cuisines from different cultures without leaving their hometowns. For instance, a supermarket in London might offer Italian pasta, Japanese sushi, and Mexican tortillas all under one roof. This variety not only makes shopping more enjoyable but also allows individuals to experiment with new recipes and broaden their culinary horizons.

Secondly, access to diverse food products can significantly enhance nutritional options. Different regions of the world produce unique fruits, vegetables, grains, and proteins that contribute to a balanced diet. For example, importing quinoa from South America or avocados from Mexico introduces nutritious options that might not be locally available. This access to a wide range of healthy foods can help consumers make better dietary choices, promoting overall health and well-being.

Moreover, the global food trade stimulates economic growth and development. Farmers and producers in developing countries benefit from exporting their goods to international markets, which can lead to increased income and improved living standards. As an illustration, a coffee farmer in Ethiopia might earn a higher income by selling their products in European supermarkets. This economic interaction fosters global trade relationships and contributes to the economic stability of exporting nations.

In conclusion, buying food from around the world in local supermarkets is a positive development. It provides greater variety, better nutrition, and supports economic growth in producing countries, enriching our diets and strengthening international economic ties.

Sample 8:

In recent decades, it has become increasingly easy to buy food grown overseas in local supermarkets. Overall, I think that this has been a positive change.

Being able to buy food produced in other countries means that people can enjoy a more varied diet, and this can have significant health benefits. For example, fruits and vegetables like avocadoes and broccoli, which are known to help people become more resistant to disease and cancer, can only be grown in warm climates, so consumers in cooler ones would not be able to eat them without food imports.

Secondly, the trend towards consuming food grown overseas means that countries will be less reliant on domestic food production to feed their population, thus providing them with greater food security. If a country suffers from a poor harvest, perhaps caused by floods or drought, then it may not be able to produce sufficient food on its own to supply the domestic market. Imports of food from overseas can help counteract this risk.

However, this development is not all positive. Shipping all this food via long-distance routes has a negative environmental impact due to the CO2 emitted by shipping. Nevertheless, new technologies, such as cleaner fuels, can help limit these harmful emissions.

In conclusion, although there are some negative environmental effects to this development, I do feel that overall, the positives far outweigh any downsides since the benefits of improved diet and domestic food security are quite significant.

Sample 9:

In numerous countries today, consumers have the convenience of purchasing food from various parts of the globe in local supermarkets. This trend presents both positive and negative aspects.

On the positive side, the availability of international food products significantly enhances consumer choice and variety. For instance, people can enjoy exotic fruits like kiwis from New Zealand or spices from India, which would otherwise be unavailable locally. This access not only enriches the culinary experience but also allows consumers to maintain a diverse and nutritious diet. Another advantage is the economic benefit derived from global trade. By importing food, countries can support farmers and producers from different regions, boosting the global economy and creating job opportunities in the logistics and retail sectors. Thus, the international food market in supermarkets greatly benefits both consumers and the economy.

Conversely, this development also brings about several drawbacks. One significant concern is the environmental impact of transporting food over long distances. For example, the carbon footprint associated with shipping fruits from one continent to another is substantial, contributing to climate change and environmental degradation. Another issue is the potential threat to local agriculture. Local farmers may find it challenging to compete with cheaper imported goods, leading to a decline in local food production and loss of agricultural heritage. These negative effects highlight the importance of considering environmental sustainability and the well-being of local producers when evaluating this trend.

In conclusion, while the global availability of food in supermarkets offers increased variety and economic benefits, it also poses environmental challenges and risks to local agriculture.

Sample 10:

In today's globalized world, consumers have the opportunity to purchase food products from all corners of the globe in their local supermarkets. While some argue that this development has negative consequences, I strongly believe it is a positive trend due to several compelling reasons.

First and foremost, the availability of international foods allows people to enjoy diverse culinary experiences without the need to travel long distances. In the past, individuals were limited to local ingredients and traditional recipes, which restricted their culinary horizons. For instance, in South Korea, bananas were virtually unknown before they were first imported. Nowadays, however, they are a staple in most supermarkets, offering Koreans a chance to enjoy an exotic fruit without traveling to Africa, where bananas are commonly grown. This easy access to a variety of foods enriches people's diets and broadens their cultural experiences.

Secondly, the development of food transportation can address food scarcity issues in certain regions. While many developed countries enjoy food abundance, several developing nations still struggle with food shortages. Additionally, climate change poses a significant risk to food production in various parts of the world. In such scenarios, the ability to import food becomes crucial. By transporting food to regions facing shortages or affected by adverse climatic conditions, we can mitigate the impact of these challenges and ensure a more equitable distribution of resources.

In conclusion, the importation of food products not only enhances culinary diversity but also plays a vital role in solving food scarcity issues. Therefore, it represents a positive development for consumers and the global community.

Sample 11:

In many nations, consumers have the chance to visit grocery stores and buy food products from across the globe. I view this development somewhat favourably because it broadens the range of grocery choices and promotes globalisation; however, it may have negative impacts on the environment.

I see this advancement positively because it provides consumers with a wide variety of food options. Access to international food products allows people to enjoy diverse cuisines and ingredients that would otherwise be unavailable. For example, in my experience, I have been able to purchase exotic fruits like dragon fruit and kiwis at my local supermarket, which has broadened my culinary horizons.

Furthermore, I consider it favourable because it supports global trade and economies. By importing food from various countries, supermarkets help create economic connections and support farmers and producers worldwide. For instance, the availability of fair-trade coffee and chocolate in my supermarket ensures that I receive high-quality products while guaranteeing that farmers in developing nations are compensated fairly.

However, a significant drawback is the environmental impact of transporting food over long distances. The carbon footprint associated with shipping and airfreighting food from one country to another contributes to global warming and environmental degradation. For instance, I have noticed that some products, such as avocados from Mexico, travel thousands of miles to reach my supermarket, raising concerns about the sustainability of such practices.

In conclusion, I am somewhat positive about the availability of global food products in supermarkets. This is because the variety of food choices and economic benefits of trade outweigh the environmental drawbacks. I also believe that the environmental damage from transportation that it causes will be mitigated by the forthcoming green energy in the near future.

Sample 12:

In recent times, supermarkets have increasingly stocked food imported from various global sources, presenting consumers with an array of options. While some view this as beneficial, I contend that it poses challenges primarily for local producers.

Advocates of globally sourced supermarket foods highlight the expanded choices available to consumers. In the past, reliance on locally grown produce limited dietary diversity, whereas today’s supermarkets offer a vast selection of fruits, vegetables, spices, and culinary products from around the world. This diversity allows consumers to explore new flavors and culinary traditions, enhancing their dining experiences. For instance, supermarkets now feature exotic fruits like Vietnamese dragon fruit, Indian mangoes, and Mexican avocados, enriching the culinary landscape and broadening consumer palates.

Conversely, the widespread availability of globally sourced food undermines local farmers. When consumers favor imported goods over locally cultivated produce, it diminishes demand for local agricultural products. Consequently, local farmers face economic hardships and struggle to sustain their livelihoods. For example, in the UK, the popularity of imported strawberries during winter adversely affected local strawberry growers, reducing sales and jeopardizing their income. This trend not only impacts farmers financially but also disrupts local economies in subtle yet significant ways.

In conclusion, while the accessibility of globally produced food in supermarkets provides consumers with diverse culinary options, it imposes substantial challenges on local agricultural sectors. To mitigate these impacts, policymakers should prioritize supporting local farming initiatives over promoting the imported food industry.

Sample 13:

Much of what we eat has been imported from a foreign country, often travelling thousands of miles to reach the supermarket shelf. Some people argue that it would be better if people bought fresh produce that had been grown locally. Whilst I have some sympathy with this point of view, I feel that it is a complex issue that needs to be looked at on a case-by-case basis.

The main argument against importing food is an environmental one. Transporting food from one country to another requires the burning of fossil fuels and results in the release of harmful carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Environmentalists are especially concerned about the transportation of fruit and vegetables by aeroplane. They argue that the harm done to the environment is not justified when similar food is available from local farms.

However, food travelling long distances is not necessarily bad for the environment. Transportation is only one factor when calculating a food's carbon footprint. For example, the meat industry in New Zealand can leverage the country's abundance of water, available pasture, and solar energy to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, despite being transported from the other side of the world, Antipodean lamb sold in the UK is the greener option.

In conclusion, I do not think we can simply say that all food should be produced locally. This does not take into account the complexity of food production in a globalised economy. Nevertheless, consumers should pay attention to where food is produced and make informed decisions where possible.

Sample 1:

Crimes have always been an impediment to the development of society. Over the ages, as the range of violations has increased, the investigators have refined the ways to solve the transgressions. As a result, it is true that the crime rate is decreasing due to progress in technology that is used to resolve criminal activities.

With the onset of forensic science, brutal acts like murder and rape can be accurately solved using blood samples, fingerprints, skin patches, or hair and dental samples. Earlier, it was dicey ground as the results were mistake-prone. But now, courts can rely on the DNA examination due to its high percentage of conclusive nature. It not only allows the judge to sort out the highly complicated cases but also helps to reopen the past cases and pass a legitimate verdict.

Digitalization of criminal records and investigation data will help the detectives and police to track down suspects or criminals. This will also deter crimes at an early stage. The presence of tracking devices, as well as monitoring devices like CCTVs, Electronic Tagging, Tracking devices, have brought the rate of thefts under control. Even accidents due to rash driving have been reduced due to the traffic cameras and speed trackers. Moreover, social media is an important medium to make the public aware of cybercrimes and fraudulent cases. For example, RBI has begun to advertise on different platforms in the various ways cyberbullies steal money from bank accounts. Earlier, some people even used social media like Facebook, Whatsapp to steal identity, trick people to steal money as well as engage in human trafficking. But now, the public has become acquainted with different ways to protect them and is on the alert not to fall prey to hackers and other criminals.

Nonetheless, the advancement of technology has also led to an increase in the variety of crimes. For example, in the past, cases of cybercrimes were nil. But now, they are on the rise. As our investigators are using different high-profile techs to solve crimes, the criminals can also gain access to such technology. Fortunately, every problem has a solution, and our brave warriors are capable of finding them.

Thus, in my opinion, in recent times, police and investigators have been successfully able to avert certain frauds, reduce crime rates and protect people with the help of advanced technology.

Sample 2:

In contemporary society, technological innovations have transformed various aspects of human life, including the field of crime prevention and detection. Some argue that these advancements have led to a decline in crime rates compared to previous decades. In my opinion, while technology undoubtedly plays a significant role, other socio-economic factors also shape crime rates.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that technological progress has bolstered law enforcement capabilities, contributing to the prevention and solving of crimes. One notable example is the surveillance technologies, such as CCTV cameras and facial recognition systems, which have become integral tools in monitoring public spaces and deterring criminal activities. Knowing they are being watched, these individuals are less likely to engage in criminal activities in areas covered by surveillance cameras. In the event of an actual crime, CCTV footage also serves as crucial evidence for law enforcement agencies. This stems from the fact that technology can help in identifying perpetrators, reconstructing events leading up to the crime, and strengthening legal cases against offenders.

On the other hand, socio-economic factors also significantly influence crime rates. This can be clearly seen in the cases of the social group living in poverty. These individuals often face limited access to education, employment, and economic resources. Such lack of viable opportunities for lawful income generation may drive some individuals towards criminal activities as a means of survival. In addition, poverty is often associated with higher rates of substance abuse and addiction. Substance abuse can impair judgment and thus increase the likelihood of individuals engaging in criminal activities to support their addiction, such as theft or drug trafficking. This goes to show that the decline in crime rate in some countries seems to stem from the effort to eradicate poverty. Therefore, attributing the decline in crime solely to technological advancements oversimplifies the complex nature of criminal behavior.

In conclusion, while technological advancements have undoubtedly contributed to the decrease in crime rates, they are not the sole solution. Addressing underlying socio-economic disparities, notably poverty, is equally crucial for effective crime prevention.

Sample 3:

Development of technologies leads to a decline in the crime rate. Technologies such as data gathering, surveillance cameras, GPS tracing, facial recognition, heat sensors etc. played a major role in declining crime rates. Here I am going to share about some incidents and how crime rates are declining due to technology improvement. 

The percentage of crime in violation of traffic rules has decreased at present when compared to the past. Due to the improvement of technological innovations. Automatic traffic signal lights, CCTV cameras. We can also say these innovations are one of the reasons to decrease the crime rate in violation of traffic rules. Because in the past if a person violated the traffic rules like going in one way route, driving a motorbike without a helmet, etc. traffic police stop them and collect fines from them for their mistake, but some people leave without stopping. But now through CCTV cameras, traffic police can watch them in the place where they were, and they send a message to their contact number. If a person fails to pay a fine within the due date, traffic police will seize their bike or car and hand it over to court, then the person should pay an extra amount with fine to get back their vehicle. 

In conclusion, I would completely agree that advancement of technologies would help to decline the crime rates at present when compared to the past. Not only on roadways but also in many other places, new innovations have helped to control crime rates.

Sample 4:

Advancement in the field of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs), it changes society but also crime. It opens wide opportunities for crime. Unfortunately, technology has also allowed individuals to carry out the act of committing crime from the place where they were. Here I am going to write an essay about why I disagree with the opinion that the crime rate nowadays is decreasing. 

Yes, there are so many technologies that have been improved and it helps to decrease the crime rate, but it is also the one reason for the increase in crime. Technology has reduced manual work to a great extent and digitized data, which makes it easiest to access from one place.  From my knowledge, I can say that the increase in crime is due to advancement of technologies. A cybercriminal operates by hacking different portals and websites to access sensitive information, implant viruses and commit several other crimes. With the knowledge of hacking, hackers were using their skill of hacking to hack random people's bank accounts. Technology is now being used to contact people through group chats, and also spy on people. But people are not using it for the correct purpose, they use it to show their status, and sharing a lot of personal information, this information helps hackers to do their crime. 

A coin has two faces, like that technology helps both the way to increase the crime and to decrease the crime. These are the reasons why I disagree with the statement that the crime rate nowadays is decreasing.

Sample 5:

There is no doubt that technological advancements have a significant role in maintaining law and order in each country, especially in curbing and solving criminal issues. Therefore, there is a dramatic decline in the crime rate in some countries in this contemporary world. In my perspective, I completely agree that technology helps police officers detect illegal activities and raise public awareness about avoiding offenders.

It can easily be seen that each household has cameras and automatic sensors that have functions to detect any break-ins. Accordingly, culprits will be captured with ease regardless of whether hosts are at home or not. On top of that, the appearance of CCTV cameras and footprint machines will help policemen record violent activities and even find out killers. A clear example is that based on cameras, investigators can recognize some features of a killer in a terrible murder. Then, other special characteristics will be seen more clearer by using the footprint machine.

Another advantage of technological innovation in this modern world is dwellers will approach the necessary methods to protect their own information. To be more precise, it is obvious that everyone has at least one online account. It means that everyone’s personal information will be published on the Internet by bad hackers and cybercriminals for illegal goals. Therefore, it’s not formidable for police technicians to provide useful ways of securing personal information.

To sum up, the advantages of technical inventions that have been mentioned above are the persuasive explanation for the reduction of criminals nowadays.

Sample 6:

It is often argued that precipitous global declines in crime are principally down to developments in technology. While advanced technology admittedly plays an integral role in crime reduction, I would argue education hits more directly at the cause of crime.

The biggest argument in favour of technology’s impact is the advent of forensic science. In the past, forensics was an unreliable soft science that included notoriously mistake prone practices such as dental identification and blood splatter analysis. Over the last couple of decades, it has grown into a much more accurate tool. Courts now rely heavily on DNA testing, which is nearly 100% conclusive in most cases. This has had a two-fold effect, allowing prosecutors to reopen and investigate cold cases as well as better prosecute and deter current criminals.

However, education still more powerfully underpins decreases in crime because it does more to eradicate poverty. Poverty is far and away the chief cause of crime. Take for example a country such as China, which has developed rapidly in the last 30 years, elevating millions formerly below the poverty line. Their economic rise has been followed by better educational standards which has trickled down into better employment opportunities for graduates. The crime rate in China has plummeted simply because far fewer people have the basic motivation, poverty, to commit crimes.

In conclusion, the impact of technology is negligible next to educational reform, which undermines the deepest roots of crime. Forward-looking countries that prioritise education will also reap benefits that extend well beyond the crime rate.

Sample 7:

Nowadays technology is advancing faster than ever, and many fields are benefiting from the opportunities this trend presents. Some think that crime prevention can be one possible application of new technologies, by allowing them to deter offenders or solve crimes in a faster and easier way. In my opinion, innovation in crime prevention can be a game-changer that will reduce both the number of crimes committed and the time it takes to catch those responsible for them.

Not everyone is optimistic about the prospects of the use of new technologies in crime prevention, and those who subscribe to the more pessimistic view say that advanced technologies can be accessed by criminals, therefore raising the crime rates. Such tools can, indeed, cause more damage if they fall into the wrong hands; however, it would require the offenders to be highly skilled to be able to use modern technologies. Statistically, many of them tend to have a lower level of education, and for that reason they are likely to stick to the old ways of committing crimes, whereas the minority of highly skilled criminals are unlikely to make a big difference to the crime levels.

The law enforcement workforce, on the other hand, has a much better grip on modern technology. Nowadays police officers and detectives undergo special training, take regular skill update courses, and use high-tech equipment. Facial recognition and thermal imaging are just two examples of the important tools that police are already using to find and catch offenders faster. Ordinary citizens can do their part in preventing burglaries by installing sophisticated systems with sensors, CCTV video feed and various alarms to detect and deter thieves. The combined effort will, no doubt, push the crime curve down.

To sum up, even though the wonders of technology are available to everyone, it seems to me that they will better assist law enforcement in solving crimes, and law-abiding citizens in protecting themselves and their property, rather than felons. This will tip the balance in favour of the reduction in crime rate and make the world a safer place.

Sample 8:

With technological advancements come numerous benefits, one of which being the decrease in crime rate. In my opinion, technology supports law enforcers in restraining and solving criminal activities.

First and foremost, nowadays, high-tech gears and programs have helped solve cases faster and more accurately. In case of milder offenses, such as burglary, CCTV cameras can help the police identify the lawbreaker through his captured images, whereas in the past, law enforcers had to rely on memory portraits from witnesses, which could often be inaccurate. For serious felonies, technological advances play an important role in bringing justice to the victims. To illustrate, in Texas, a 35-year-old cold case has just been solved using DNA technology. The 1986 murder was thought to be hopeless as technology back then did not allow for DNA analysis, yet three decades later, justice was found thanks to innovations in crime science.

Another advantage of technological developments is its ability to prevent crimes. What this means is that through the use of technology, crime attempts can be deterred. For example, released convicts will usually be forced to wear a GPS tracking device and be put on a watchlist. Thanks to this, criminals will have to rethink their plans of recidivism as they could be busted easily and sent to jail. Compared to the old days, those who have done their sentences were free to do whatever they wanted, leading to high recidivism rates.

To conclude, with the power in curbing potential criminal activities and crime-solving, the reduction of crimes can be attributed to technological developments.

Sample 9:

It is believed that the crime rate can be declined thanks to enormous benefits of technological advancements. I agree with this point of view because these technological devices can solve and prevent illegal activities.

To begin with, technological innovation is a wonderful tool that has facilitated the improvement of approaches to crime detection. In the past, the investigative processes on crimes heavily relied on blurred eyewitness memory, making it difficult to catch criminals. However, CCTV cameras now, for example, are employed as a means to identify crimes with clear imagery which supports law enforcement officers with prosecution processes or as evidence in a court. Hence, the swift development in computer vision and recognition-based security systems provides opportunities for investigating CCTV surveillance as a crime identification mechanism.

Furthermore, in the past, the lack of access to timely information made it impossible for agencies to track down criminals, hence, they tended to escape from police arrest. Nevertheless, thanks to advances in updating, and sharing information on high-profile techs, it has led to tighter connections between law enforcement agencies in different regions. For example, serious cases involving international crimes that cross borders can be handled quickly as the advent of technology also allows legal authorities to have near-instant communication via the Internet. This reduces the number of criminals who intend to commit crimes and flee to another country. Therefore, serious crimes can be deterred at an early stage.

In conclusion, with technologies being increasingly innovated in today’s society, the crime rate has been significantly reduced compared to many years ago.

Sample 10:

It is argued that the numbers of criminal incidents are lower than before because of the developing technology which keeps people away from the criminal world. I partly agree with the view that advancements in technology have an impact on the rate of committing crimes, while I believe that also the offenders benefit from the technological developments.

On the one hand, technology always helps officers catch the offenders or stop the people who plan to commit a crime throughout history. Besides that, nowadays, there are lots of breakthroughs regarding preventing most crimes. For example, officers have the fingerprints of ex-offenders which enable police to find out the re-offenders. Furthermore, it can easily be said that computer-based systems or surveillance cameras contribute to agencies when they need to track some murderers or to monitor the money-transfer of some terrorists. Moreover, the advancements in technology also make individuals keep in safe, giving the equipments of home security or some applications on smart phones which are capable of calling the police when the user is in a dangerous situation.

On the other hand, the technological benefits bring their own risks in the modern world. There are various technological advancements which make criminal people's jobs easier than ever since the market is useful for all people. Most of systems which are built up by computers have their own security barriers, which means that they also have some loops in their security systems. For example, even though digital banking is fairly beneficial for customers, there are certain risks like phishing users' ID or cracking all security barriers. Likewise, there are some the cyber-risks for citizens.

In conclusion, there are obviously some pros and cons related to the technology's impact on criminal cases. I partly support the people who claim that nowadays the technological developments contribute to prevent crimes, whilst I think some developments in technology adversely impact the criminal world.

Sample 1:

Many today feel that countries should prioritise vocational training over higher education due to changes in the labour market. In my opinion, though there are strong economic reasons to support this idea, university education holds greater value.

Those in favour of more practical skills training point out the financial benefits. Most university graduates are burdened with student debt and face uncertain job prospects. In contrast, training schools are cheap, fast, and ease students into steady employment immediately. The jobs they train for are also most likely recession-proof and durable, including positions as cooks, hotel managers, and skilled technicians. Someone who is firmly established in such a job in their early 20s does not have to deal with the pressures associated with university life and its incumbent debts. Instead, they can begin to set aside money for a house or start a family.

Nonetheless, lacking a university degree limits one’s options. The jobs available will pay well initially and be secure but offer a narrow scope for advancement and virtually no opportunity to switch career paths. An individual with a university degree, on the other hand, might begin from a lower position but has a higher ceiling on future earnings. It is also possible for them to explore a variety of fields. Most good jobs require at least a bachelor’s degree even for simple internship vacancies. Lacking such a degree means restricting oneself to manual labour or service industry jobs. The actual learning that takes place at university, particularly for those with multi-disciplinary majors or studying at liberal arts schools, also encourages students to consider a wide range of possible career options.

In conclusion, increasing funding for vocational training is an attractive yet short-sighted approach that curbs possibilities. Governments ought to continue to support higher education even in dark economic times in order to reap future rewards.

Sample 2:

The perennial debate on whether nations should predominantly invest in vocational training over tertiary education ignites varied perspectives. This essay contends that while practical skills are imperative, the merits of university education cannot be undermined.

Primarily, proponents advocating spending more money on skills and vocational training underscore the immediate applicability of such skills in the workforce. Practical work tends to offer swift economic benefits, as it equips individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Contrastingly, those who support the motion to spend money on university education argue that higher education cultivates a more profound skill set, including critical thinking, analytical abilities, and versatility, which are indispensable in the dynamic global market. Universities act as incubators for professionals like engineers, doctors, and educators, whose roles cannot be understated. These institutions not only provide theoretical knowledge but also encourage research and development. A quintessential example would be the role university research plays in medical breakthroughs, which are fundamental to societal progression.

However, juxtaposing these two educational pathways presents a false dichotomy. It is crucial to acknowledge that both vocational training and university education serve distinct yet complementary purposes. Investing in both areas can yield a more holistic and robust workforce. A balanced approach would not only harness immediate skill sets but also foster long-term intellectual capital which could adapt to future changes in the job market.

In conclusion, a balanced allocation of funds towards both vocational training and university education is imperative. The former addresses immediate economic demands with practical skills, while the latter ensures long-term societal progress through intellectual development. This dual investment strategy is crucial for a nation's comprehensive growth.

Sample 3:

There is a claim that funding should be decreased for higher education and increased for the purpose of conducting workshops and trainings focused on obtaining jobs. This essay firmly concurs with this assertion since vocational training equips students with greater employability that enables them to land their desired employment without devoting years to obtaining a university degree.

To commence, vocational training facilities have given students hands-on opportunity to plan their professional paths. This practical sector has more overt goals of directing the students toward tangible job paths, in contrast to university education, which places a greater emphasis only on theoretical learning. Vocational programs provide internship opportunities as a component of the curriculum, which provide students with some relevant powerful skills that are crucial for their later entry into the labour market. Furthermore, because job-related training institutions are rapidly receiving accreditation from governments and concerned upper echelons, degrees from this education platform not only satisfy the standards for formal qualifications, but also serve as credentials for practical abilities.

Additionally, vocational training fields have higher cost-effective values in terms of both time and money. While employment-oriented trainings are far less expensive and more accessible, university education is so expensive that some students are unable to pay it and end up taking out loans. Moreover, students in vocational schools typically spend only two years for a degree, which is sufficient time for acquiring their necessary skills, and they find their suitable jobs immediately after the degree, whereas university degrees typically take four years to complete and even after that the graduates struggle to find their desired jobs, resulting in a continuous debt burden. It follows that those who receive vocational training don't need to pursue additional years of education or wait an extended period of time to secure employment.

In conclusion, people with vocational education join the workforce more quickly than university graduates do, with more precise skill sets and less expenditure. Therefore, the onus is on governments to allocate more funds for this efficient skill-based education sector.

Sample 4:

The allocation of a country's resources towards the betterment of its citizens' education has always been a topic of debate. Specifically, some argue that nations should channel more money on skills and vocational training geared towards practical work, as opposed to traditional university education. I vehemently agree with this stance, believing that the emphasis on vocational training offers more tangible benefits in the current global scenario.

One of the primary reasons for my perspective is the evident skills gap in many industries. While university degrees often provide a broad education, they sometimes lack the specialized training required for certain job roles. By investing more money in skills and vocational training, nations can directly address the needs of industries such as plumbing, carpentry, or even advanced roles in technology and healthcare. For instance, in countries like Germany, apprenticeship programs that focus on specific trades have led to lower youth unemployment rates, as young adults are equipped with the exact skills employers are seeking.

Moreover, the nature of work and employment is rapidly evolving with the advent of technology and automation. Practical skills that are honed through vocational training make individuals more adaptable and resilient in the face of such changes. A graduate with a degree in liberal arts might possess critical thinking and analytical skills but may find it challenging to secure a job without the necessary practical skills that many industries now demand. Conversely, an individual trained in, say, digital marketing or coding through a vocational course, would find it considerably easier to enter the job market and even command a higher starting salary.

In conclusion, while university education remains valuable, it's vital for nations to prioritize skills and vocational training in today's dynamic job market. This shift not only assures economic stability but also paves the way for a prosperous future for their citizens.

Sample 5:

The allocation of government funds to either skills and vocational training or university education is a subject of significant debate. While some argue that resources should be primarily directed towards skills and vocational training, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint. This essay will present arguments against this proposition, highlighting the crucial role of university education.

First and foremost, it is essential to recognize that university education is not merely about acquiring specialized knowledge but also about fostering critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. Universities provide a holistic learning environment that encourages students to explore various disciplines, enabling them to develop a wide range of skills beyond practical, job-specific training. For example, a student studying history may develop research, analytical, and communication skills that can be applied to various professions, not just history-related roles.

Furthermore, universities serve as hubs of research and innovation, contributing to advancements in various fields that benefit society as a whole. Many groundbreaking discoveries and technological innovations have originated from university research. For instance, universities have played a pivotal role in the development of life-saving medical treatments, environmentally sustainable technologies, and revolutionary scientific theories.

Finally, technical and specialized universities, often associated with university education, are instrumental in producing highly skilled professionals in various fields. These institutions offer comprehensive programs that nurture engineers, inventors, scientists, artists, and other experts who possess a depth of knowledge and expertise that surpasses what most ordinary vocational training institutes can provide.

In conclusion, while skills and vocational training are undeniably valuable for equipping individuals with practical skills, the assertion that the government should allocate more resources to this area at the expense of university education is flawed. Universities offer a broader spectrum of benefits, including fostering critical thinking and driving innovation, which are vital for societal progress. They also create leaders, inventors, engineers and so on who contribute to the development of the nation.

Sample 6:

While some people believe that the government should allocate more subsidies for vocational education than higher education, personally, I believe these two forms of education should be equally invested.

It is understandable why some people advocate for more funding towards trades training. Firstly, such programs are more cost-effective than university education. Unlike academic studies which normally requires at least 3,5 years to complete, students choosing vocational courses can graduate after 2 years. Secondly, vocational schools can alleviate the nation's labor shortage. Higher education tends to prioritize theoretical knowledge. Some majors even place a heavy emphasis on theories rather than practical skills, which would cost businesses time and money to retrain these graduates. Trades schools, on the other hand, equip students with more specific skills for the in-demand jobs. This helps vacancies to be quickly filled, allowing smooth operations.

Despite the benefits of vocational programs, higher education also has its own merits. Firstly, tertiary education provides high-quality workforce, contributing to a developed economy. Universities produce intellectual graduates from various fields such as science, medicine, technology, and engineering. These professions can foster innovation and encourage new technologies, playing a crucial role in the development of the economy. Furthermore, thanks to high workload and requirements from academic studies, students can be equipped with necessary transferable skills such as time management, problem-solving and presentation skills. Acquiring these skills, students would become more prepared for their future careers, making them more competitive in the labor market.

In conclusion, degree programs and technical training have their own merits, which benefit both learners and the nation's economy. Therefore, I hold a belief that the government should prioritize neither, instead, resources should be equally invested.

Sample 7:

Pragmatism is a dominant tendency in today’s world, exemplified by the emphasis on training for practical work over university education. Although I do not question the importance of vocational training, I object to the notion that it is superior to university education.

Equipping the workforce with relevant skills and knowledge is definitely important and beneficial. Apparently, not everyone is capable of learning in a research-oriented environment, which is typical of university education. In fact, it would be detrimental to assume that all individuals, no matter how competent, should be given an equal opportunity to attend university. This will certainly result in the decline in the quality of higher education, illustrated by the on-going deterioration at many institutions in the US, as depicted by Tom Nichols in ‘The Death of the Expertise’. Meanwhile, a skilled worker can create tangible values for society, which is worth encouraging.

However, this does not mean that the above-mentioned emphasis is appropriate. On the contrary, negligence towards higher education would cause incredible damage to a country’s sustainability and growth. For instance, without continual research into and teaching of the basic sciences, which have recently been under attack and accused of being impractical, no foundation could be laid for further scientific and technological applications. Similarly, studies of history, literature, and philosophy are usually condemned as abstruse and therefore unnecessary, yet without them, human beings would suffer immeasurable mental poverty and are no different from mindless labor-machines.

In conclusion, as I have mentioned, just as researchers play an indispensable role in society, skilled workers are equally essential and respectable. Nevertheless, recognizing the significance of vocational training is completely different from underestimating higher education.

Sample 8:

In response to the prompt, I strongly agree that nations should allocate more funds towards skills and vocational training for practical work. While university education is essential, it is not the only means of acquiring knowledge and skills.

Firstly, practical skills are in high demand in the workforce. Vocational training can equip individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Secondly, vocational training is more cost-effective than university education. University education is expensive, and not everyone can afford it. In contrast, vocational training is more affordable and accessible to a broader range of people. This accessibility can help reduce the skills gap in the workforce and promote social mobility.

In conclusion, nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work. By investing in vocational training, nations can equip their workforce with practical skills, promote social mobility, and foster innovation.

Sample 1:

It has been observed that many working individuals find themselves without adequate time outside of work to spend with family and friends. This essay will discuss the causes of this phenomenon and its impacts on family ties and society.

The shortage of free time among workers is attributed to several factors. First and foremost, among them is that the increasingly competitive labor market these days requires individuals to work long hours to secure their employment and advance their careers, leaving them with less free time and little energy remaining to enjoy themselves. Over time, this reduces their desire and enthusiasm to engage in family activities or social gatherings. Another contributing factor is that technological advances, including the Internet and smartphones, have blurred the lines between work and personal life. Living in a state of constant connectivity makes it difficult to retreat from work-related communications, even while off the clock, thereby interfering with the quality time and undivided attention people need for interactions with their loved ones.

The adverse consequences of such a work-centric lifestyle are significant in terms of children's development and productivity in society. With regard to the former, the lack of quality time spent with family members can weaken family bonds and impede children's emotional and social development. This could exacerbate misunderstandings between generations and prevent children from developing into well-rounded individuals due to the absence of care and guidance from their parents. On a societal level, not having sufficient time for meaningful relationships can lead to decreased job satisfaction and increased stress levels, which is unsustainable in terms of a society's productivity. For instance, in response to a growing work-life imbalance, there has been an infamous trend known as 'quiet quitting,' where employees only fulfill their basic duties and avoid putting in extra effort, potentially hindering economic growth in the long run.

In conclusion, the fact that many people do not have sufficient free time to spend with family and friends among working individuals is driven by today's intense job demands and modern technology. This trend poses significant challenges for both family connections and a society’s economic health in the long term.

Sample 2:

As modern society progresses, demand for a higher living standard rises accordingly and thus leads to a trend of intensive working hours with little to no time for your loved ones. Several points have been raised to accommodate this phenomenon, and the outcomes can be detrimental to the populace.

A competitive working environment is considered one of the key factors behind why people work for the majority of their time. The concept of a nine-to-five job is getting hazier as employees are now required to work overtime even at home late at night to fulfill the company's quotas, hence the very little time and energy they have left for families. Another point in favor of such a hectic schedule might be due to the rising expenses that cause the most basic needs to be paid with prices that could be a dilemma for most families like rising electric bills and appliance maintenance. However, such occupational compliance might not always be the case as there are workaholics who willingly sacrifice family time in search of validation from society and their superiors, resulting in tireless endeavors for lucrative wages and promotions within the corporate ladder.

The aftermath of this matter is quite paradoxical as when people work harder to meet the family's needs, they also tend to stray away from the ones that they hold most dear. From family members' point of view, they only see the person working as someone who only cares about their career and abandons them. As a result, partners feel neglected, and offspring resent their parents for not being there for them during their childhood. Lacking parental care might create a stark scenario where children succumb to bad habits, namely drinking alcohol and using drugs, at an early age and even suffer from mental illnesses, severely affecting their prospects. For married couples, if the strife between them perpetuates for a long time without amendment, divorce is inevitable, affecting individual households and society as a whole.

In conclusion, it is evident that the trend of spending excessive time and effort on one's profession only carries dire effects that severely compromise family qualities. Unless there are resolutions to this growing concern, families within society for the moment will continue to endure this predicament.

Sample 3:

It is undeniable that many modern laborers struggle with the balance between work and life, creating long-lasting effects upon our personal lives and collective society. This essay will argue that the causes of this phenomenon are largely economical and explore its wide-reaching effects for individuals and society as a whole.

Among the many causes of the imbalance between our social and working lives, the ever-rising cost of living is arguably the largest. Wages all around the world have failed to keep up with inflation, while food, housing, fuel, and other necessities have increased ceaselessly in price. Whereas previous generations could comfortably provide a middle-class lifestyle for themselves and their families on blue-collar or low-level office salaries, many of today’s workers find it increasingly far-fetched to support themselves, much less their families, with such professions. Most egregiously, in many regions of the world, the price of housing has increased at a rate 5 or even 10 times faster than the median salary. As a direct consequence, people have to spend more time working - sometimes even juggling additional jobs - simply to keep afloat, leading to overworking and less leisure time that the average laborer can otherwise spend on themselves or those close to them. This poses significant challenges to both personal mental health and the society we live in.

Another noteworthy cause is each nation’s culture. In many Asian countries, for example, it is expected that the “man of the house” has to provide for his family. Most notably, in China, male citizens are rarely considered “desirable” if they do not own at least one real estate property and a car. This puts additional burden on these individuals and forces them to work harder and earn more in order to be “worthy” of marriage.

Some of the negative impact this has had on society can clearly be seen, while others are only starting to rear their heads. On the individual side, there has been an increase in mental health issues. The significant time spent at work presents considerable obstacles to the creation and maintenance of personal and familial relationships. Therefore, many sociologists argue that there is at least a correlation between personal time and mental health, wherein people who spend less time on their hobbies, passions, as well as friends and families, are substantially more prone to psychological issues such as depression, loneliness, and stress.

These personal struggles reverberate throughout society and carry with them significant blowbacks. For instance, workers who struggle with mental problems are unlikely to be as productive or effective as those who do not, which then manifests as reduced economic output for the national and global economy. Furthermore, the barriers to meeting new people and starting families result in declining birth rates around the world, particularly in countries with “unhealthy” work culture, such as Japan and Korea. While we do not yet fully understand the consequences of low national birth rate, there have already been numerous downsides for these societies. As an example, Japan is suffering from rapid depopulation, with many workers indicating that they have “no intentions” of ever starting a family when interviewed in many studies. At the very least, the social welfare burden on younger generations will undoubtedly be devastating for these countries’ long-term economic prospects.

In conclusion, many factors force workers in the modern economy to dedicate large portions of their time to working, to disastrous effects for both the individual and the collective that may not be easy to recover from. Thus, it is of utmost importance that we as a society start to recognize these problems and work towards mitigating them.

Sample 4:

In the contemporary era, the issue of insufficient leisure time available for most working individuals to spend with their kin and acquaintances has been a matter of concern. This essay aims to explore the underlying reasons for this situation and its implications on familial relationships and society.

Due to work-related pressures and an increasing culture of overtime, people often find themselves devoid of any free time after work. Workers are overburdened with numerous tasks and responsibilities that eventually lead to late working hours. Added to this, many choose to dedicate any remaining time to self-improvement activities or further education to stay competitive. This combination of work, self-development, and study, leaves many workers preferring solitude owing to exhaustion, rather than socializing with their loved ones.

Notably, this scarcity of free time can have detrimental effects on both family life and society. When individuals cannot spend sufficient time with their families due to work commitments, they neglect their familial responsibilities, gradually leading to strained relationships and lack of mutual understanding. On a broader level, society experiences a decline in social interactions which may result in isolation, turning individuals into less sociable beings. This insular behavior instigates loneliness and can ultimately influence the personality traits of an individual.

To conclude, as many employees today are overwhelmed with work and self-improvement, they lack adequate time for family and friends, leading to an adverse effect on relationships and society.

Sample 5:

In modern society, it is increasingly common for many individuals in the workforce to find themselves lacking the necessary free time to allocate to their families and friends. This phenomenon is primarily attributable to several factors.

Firstly, the escalating demands of the workplace contribute significantly to this issue. With the intensification of competition and the pursuit of higher productivity, employees are often required to work longer hours, leaving them with limited leisure time. Additionally, advancements in technology have blurred the boundaries between work and personal life, enabling work to encroach into traditionally non-working hours.

Furthermore, the aspiration for an improved standard of living also plays a role in this predicament. Many individuals engage in extensive work commitments in pursuit of financial stability and material comfort, inadvertently sacrificing precious moments with their loved ones.

The repercussions of this trend on family life are profound. The dearth of quality time spent together diminishes familial bonds and may lead to heightened tension and conflict among family members. Moreover, the inadequate attention devoted to child-rearing and education could impede the holistic development of children, hindering their emotional and cognitive growth.

At the societal level, the scarcity of social interactions outside the workplace fosters feelings of isolation and estrangement. Individuals deprived of sufficient leisure time may experience heightened levels of stress and mental health issues, adversely affecting overall societal well-being.

In conclusion, the diminishing availability of free time for individuals to spend with their families and friends stems from various factors, including workplace demands and societal aspirations. This phenomenon exerts detrimental effects on both family life and society as a whole. Efforts to strike a balance between work and personal life are imperative to mitigate these adverse consequences and foster healthier, more fulfilling lifestyles.

Sample 1:

The development of technology has fostered various innovations. One of which is being able to enjoy entertainment performances at home from one’s laptop. From my point of view, even though watching concerts online offers viewers flexibility and comfort, attending a live performance has more benefits for the audience and performers.

On the one hand, online performances have their own advantages. To start with, people can save a lot of money and time from opting for shows’ online versions. Due to its minimal requirements - a screen-based device and internet connection, people can entertain themselves anywhere and anytime. Moreover, fees for online performances are significantly lower than for live ones, meaning that more people will get to see shows without having to pay handsomely. Furthermore, online performances allow people who cannot come to the show’s venue to still have fun. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic, a number of performances from Kpop idols were broadcasted online, satisfying their fans’ need for entertainment.

On the other hand, advocates of live performances have grounds to believe that this will be more beneficial to both the artist and the viewer. First, only by watching live can the audience feel the atmosphere of the show, which is a vital factor in a performance’s appeal. Thanks to the crowd effect, people are more likely to gain more satisfaction and delirium compared to watching shows alone at home. A direct effect of this is that people can relieve stress and mental exhaustion at work, while strengthening bonds with their friends when they attend live shows together. As for artists, since a large portion of live shows’ audiences are people who love the atmosphere, therefore, when switching to performing on online platforms, the number of viewers and amount of profit will drop significantly.

All in all, despite the advantages that watching performances online can bring, admiring them in real life offers the audience irreplaceable experiences and performers can gain more handsome profits.

Sample 2:

Some people question the necessity of experiencing a live performance when watching it at home on television is supposedly superior. While acknowledging why many people prefer the convenience of experiencing plays, concerts, and other events through their TV screens, I ultimately disagree that this is better than being present at a live show.

One can understand the appeal of viewing performances on television. One obvious benefit is that it allows people to avoid traveling, paying high ticket prices, and dealing with large crowds. When watching at home, viewers have the option to pause, rewind, or replay parts of the show as desired from their own living rooms, which would not be possible in a live setting. An additional advantage is that television offers close-up camera angles and editing that may provide a more intimate viewing experience than being seated far away at a live venue. This is especially true with today’s cutting-edge recording technology, which offers exceptionally good audio and video quality for audiences watching at home.

Despite these advantages, I believe there are even more compelling reasons why attending a live performance is superior. A key factor is the energy and atmosphere of being part of a live audience. At a live concert, there is an electric, communal experience of laughter, applause, and spontaneous reactions that simply cannot be replicated when watching through a screen. Live performances are also more authentic as they have an intensity, passion, and risk involving real human performers in the present moment. Even minor issues, whether they arise from technical errors or from the performers’ mistakes, can make each live show feel unique and genuine. Once aired on television, these moments are often refined or removed altogether, which can result in a more polished but significantly less authentic performance.

In conclusion, while the convenience and production quality of television viewings are notable benefits, they ultimately cannot match the unparalleled experience of attending a live performance in person. Specifically, the dynamism of live shows, coupled with their authenticity, make live attendance vastly preferable to merely watching at home.

Sample 3:

It is argued by some that there is no longer any need to attend live performances, because watching them on TV or computer screens is even better. While this opinion is reasonable to an extent, I believe that going to live concerts gives us a much more immersive experience.

On the one hand, people who do not like to be in crowded places, and those who view shows merely as a form of relaxation, would most reasonably choose to watch concerts on TV. Firstly, being in noisy and crowded places causes some individuals to feel uncomfortable, making the option of watching concerts at home more appealing. Watching performances at home can also offer a pleasant experience thanks to the high-quality sounds and visual effects that today’s TVs come equipped with. Moreover, in today’s fast-paced and busy working culture, people are given fewer days off. Therefore, being able to set aside enough time and money to attend concerts has become something of a luxury that not many can afford, while enjoying shows at home is a more time-saving and convenient form of entertainment.

On the other hand, attending a live concert offers fans an unforgettable and collective entertainment experience unmatched by simply enjoying it from home. Elaborate stage setups and stunning lighting effects are crucial elements that enhance artists’ performances. This produces an electrifying atmosphere filled with excitement, passion and energy, creating lasting memories that TV broadcasts cannot fully capture. In addition, a sense of community and fulfillment can be built among those involved, as both fans and artists enjoy live shows together. This is exemplified by the popularity of Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, which has attracted millions of fans worldwide to attend concerts in various countries.

In conclusion, people who are not able to attend concerts can enjoy the shows on high-tech TVs with vibrant colors and high-quality sound systems. However, going to concerts offers fans unique experiences and a feeling of belonging that cannot be replicated at home.

Sample 4:

Many opine that the necessity of attending live performances, such as concerts, has been eradicated since TV or computers have facilitated the ability to watch this type of entertainment from home. Although the convenience that technology has brought is undeniable, I mostly disagree with this opinion since remote watching cannot replicate the experience and opportunities of social engagement of attending live performances.

The foremost justification for my opposition is based on the unparalleled sensory experience provided by attending live performances. Indeed, the energy and atmosphere of a live concert, the acoustics of a theater performance, or the ambiance of a sporting event are all aspects that can only be fully appreciated in person. The immersive nature of being physically present in the audience allows individuals to engage with the performance on a deeper level, fostering a sense of connection and emotional resonance that is often lacking in virtual viewing.

Furthermore, live performances offer opportunities for social interaction and community engagement. Specifically, attending events with friends, family, or fellow enthusiasts not only enhances the enjoyment of the performance but also fosters bonds and creates lasting memories. Additionally, live events often serve as cultural hubs where people from diverse backgrounds come together to celebrate shared interests and passions, contributing to a sense of belonging and unity within society.

Admittedly, I concede that watching live performances from home offers convenience and flexibility. With just a few clicks, individuals can access a wide range of performances from around the world without the hassles such as commuting, queuing for tickets, dealing with crowded venues, or even paying. This convenience is particularly beneficial for those with busy schedules or mobility restrictions, allowing them to enjoy cultural and entertainment experiences that were previously inaccessible.

In conclusion, although technology has made it feasible to appreciate live performances from home, I predominantly disagree that it negates the importance of attending such events. While acknowledging the convenience of remote viewing, the unique experience of being physically present remains irreplaceable, including the sensory immersion and the social interactions that are integral to a human's life.

Sample 5:

In the digital age, the convenience and quality of watching performances on TV or computer screens have improved significantly, leading some to believe that attending live shows is no longer necessary. However, while technology offers high-quality viewing experiences, it cannot fully replicate the unique atmosphere and emotional connection of live performances.

Firstly, live performances offer an irreplaceable atmosphere that screens cannot capture. The energy of a live audience, the immediacy of the performers, and the unrepeatable moments create a shared experience that enhances the enjoyment and emotional impact of the event. This collective participation fosters a sense of community and connection that is absent when watching alone on a screen.

Secondly, attending live performances supports artists and the arts industry directly. Live shows provide performers with essential income and feedback from their audience, which is crucial for their development and sustainability. Additionally, the presence of a live audience can inspire performers to deliver more passionate and engaging performances, enriching the overall experience for both the artists and the viewers.

In conclusion, while watching performances on TV or computer screens offers convenience and high-quality visuals, the unique atmosphere and direct support for artists make live performances irreplaceable. Experiencing live shows fosters a sense of community and ensures the continued vitality of the arts. Therefore, attending live performances remains a valuable and enriching experience that cannot be fully substituted by digital means.

Sample 6:

In today's digital age, the accessibility of music performances has expanded beyond traditional live experiences. While some argue that enjoying a music performance on a screen is superior to watching it in person, I firmly disagree. In this essay, I will present compelling arguments to support my viewpoint.

There are certain reasons why attending a live performance is an unparalleled experience that cannot be replicated by watching a recorded version. Firstly, the combination of the vibrant atmosphere, abundant energy, and direct interactions between performers and the live audience can create a truly immersive experience that transcends everyday life. Performing artists can easily generate an electrifying ambiance filled with palpable excitement and raw emotions that can only be fully experienced in person. This attraction can be demonstrated by the roaring cheers and applause of a crowd at a concert or the gasps and laughter of an audience at a comedy show. Secondly, live events tend to foster deeper connections among people. Whether it is a gathering of like-minded fans, close friends, or even family members, going to an in- person show together enables people to forge stronger bonds through shared interests and collective enjoyment. These occasions not only allow individuals to appreciate art in its most authentic form but also provide an avenue for meaningful connections with others, resulting in indelible memories.

Nevertheless, it is true that enjoying entertainment shows in one's familiar space can bring a level of comfort that is also hard to match. Without the need to line up, fight for a seat, or be at the mercy of the weather, watching a concert in the cozy space of one's own home while dressed in comfortable clothing can be a relaxing and private experience, free from the distractions and discomforts of a public venue.

In conclusion, I believe that despite the convenience of watching from home, the magic of a live show remains unmatched.

Sample 1:

In recent years, the alarming consumption of natural resources such as oil, forests, and fresh water has sparked considerable debate. This essay will explore the ramifications of such practices and propose viable solutions to mitigate these issues, with a focus on the context of Vietnam.

The rapid depletion of these resources leads to a myriad of environmental and economic problems. Primarily, the overuse of oil contributes significantly to air pollution and global warming, a scenario vividly illustrated by the dense smog enveloping Hanoi during peak traffic hours. Moreover, the deforestation in areas like the Central Highlands not only results in loss of biodiversity but also exacerbates climate change through increased carbon emissions. If action is not taken, these conditions could lead to catastrophic environmental degradation. A conditional scenario highlights the severity: If sustainable practices are not adopted, Vietnam might witness unparalleled ecological disasters and economic downturns.

However, I believe that through collective effort and innovative policies, these dire outcomes can be averted. Promoting renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, especially in sun-drenched regions like Ninh Thuan or Binh Thuan, could significantly reduce dependence on oil. Additionally, implementing strict forestry management and reforestation projects, akin to the successful endeavours in provinces such as Thanh Hoa, where local communities are actively involved in tree planting, can help restore forest cover and biodiversity. These measures, if adopted, would not only mitigate environmental damage but also pave the way for sustainable economic development.

In conclusion, the unchecked consumption of natural resources poses significant threats to both the environment and the economy. Nevertheless, by embracing renewable energy and enforcing stringent resource management policies, Vietnam can safeguard its natural heritage and ensure a sustainable future for generations to come. This approach underscores the importance of collective responsibility and innovative thinking in addressing environmental challenges.

Sample 2:

The rate at which natural resources are being depleted is causing great concern. This trend brings about harmful effects to the environment such as biodiversity loss and air pollution, which could be tackled by the enactment of stricter laws and the employment of greener energy sources.

There are various issues which are caused by the over-consumption of natural resources. One of the biggest consequences is the decline in the number of living species. Due to long-term human activities such as excessive logging and clearance of forests for farming, wildlife is deprived of their natural habitat. If this situation prolongs, they may even go extinct. In addition, the burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal leaves detrimental impacts on the air quality. When fossil fuels are burned, they release harmful chemicals and particles into the atmosphere, which heavily contaminates the air.

However, several solutions can be implemented to cope with these problems. First, the government could impose heavy taxes on forest exploitation activities that endanger wildlife. This would discourage people from conducting unsustainable practices of using forest space. Moreover, the fines collected can be invested in biodiversity conservation campaigns. Another solution is to shift to alternative energy. Instead of burning fossil fuels for energy, renewable energy sources such as biomass, wind or solar power can be utilized. These types of energy produce little to no air pollutants; therefore, creating a fresher atmosphere.

In conclusion, the excessive use of natural resources is causing animals to lose their homes and deteriorating the air quality. However, these problems can be mitigated by the government taking strict actions against deforestation and harnessing eco-friendly substitutions for energy.

Sample 3:

The overconsumption of natural resources, including oil, forests, and freshwater, is leading to severe environmental, social, and economic problems. To tackle this issue, it is crucial to adopt sustainable practices that prioritize conservation, preservation, and efficient use of natural resources. This essay will explore the problems caused by the overconsumption of natural resources and suggest viable solutions to address this issue.

To commence, the overexploitation of natural resources has a direct impact on the environment. For instance, deforestation leads to soil erosion, loss of biodiversity, and increased carbon emissions, which contribute to climate change. Similarly, excessive use of freshwater resources leads to water scarcity, affecting the agricultural sector, public health, and biodiversity. Furthermore, the overconsumption of natural resources leads to social and economic issues. For example, oil dependence leads to price fluctuations, geopolitical instability, and national security concerns. Additionally, deforestation can lead to displacement of local communities, loss of traditional livelihoods, and social unrest.

To address these problems, it is crucial to adopt sustainable practices that prioritize conservation, preservation, and efficient use of natural resources. For instance, governments can introduce policies to reduce consumption of fossil fuels by promoting renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydropower. Additionally, we can promote reforestation and afforestation projects to restore degraded ecosystems, protect biodiversity, and mitigate climate change. Moreover, we can use technology to promote efficient water use, such as rainwater harvesting, drip irrigation, and water recycling. At the individual level, we can adopt simple yet effective measures such as reducing water consumption, switching to eco-friendly products, and adopting a plant-based diet.

In conclusion, the overconsumption of natural resources has far-reaching consequences on our environment, economy, and society. To tackle this issue, we need to adopt sustainable practices that prioritize conservation, preservation, and efficient use of natural resources. We can achieve this through a combination of policy interventions, technological innovations, and individual actions. Only by working together can we create a sustainable future for ourselves and future generations.

Sample 4:

The voracious consumption of natural resources, including oil, forests, and freshwater, presents a pressing global dilemma. This unsustainable exploitation heralds dire consequences, notably environmental degradation and resource scarcity, mandating urgent remedial actions. Firstly, the depletion of these resources accelerates climate change and biodiversity loss, warranting strategies for conservation and sustainable use. Secondly, the resultant scarcity underscores the need for alternative energy sources and efficient water management practices. This essay aims to delve into these issues, proposing viable solutions to mitigate their impact.

The rampant deforestation and overuse of fossil fuels contribute significantly to global warming, as these actions release vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Forests, vital for carbon sequestration, are diminished, exacerbating the greenhouse effect. Additionally, the overexploitation of freshwater resources leads to shortages, affecting millions globally. To combat these issues, it is imperative to adopt sustainable resource management practices. For instance, reforestation initiatives and the promotion of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, could significantly reduce carbon emissions. Moreover, implementing water-saving technologies in agriculture and industry, coupled with promoting conservation among consumers, can alleviate water scarcity.

Furthermore, the transition to a more sustainable consumption pattern is crucial. Governments and corporations should incentivize the adoption of green technologies and sustainable practices through subsidies and tax benefits. Public awareness campaigns can educate individuals on the importance of conserving natural resources and adopting eco-friendly habits. Additionally, international cooperation is essential in enforcing environmental protection laws and sharing sustainable technologies, as environmental issues transcend national borders.

In conclusion, the excessive consumption of natural resources poses severe environmental and societal challenges. Addressing these problems requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing sustainable management, the adoption of renewable energy sources, efficient water use, and a collective move towards sustainable consumption. Through concerted efforts from governments, businesses, and individuals, it is possible to forge a sustainable future, ensuring the preservation of our planet for future generations.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, natural resources have been overused at an increasing speed. The hazardous activities like deforestation, excessive burning of fossil fuels and overuse of freshwater etc. are severely damaging the environment and endangering the human and animal habitats. However, proper governmental actions such as taxation and awareness campaigns can be effective approaches to resolve this problem.

Excessive use of natural resources in the form of burning fossil fuels, wood logging, and overuse of water is damaging the environment which is resulting in increased global warming and drought. These thoughtless activities are causing the severe rise of temperature, abnormal climate cycle, irregular rainfalls, and droughts in various regions, resulting in fast animal extinction and extreme water scarcity. Also, all these factors work in synergy, interfering with the wild and human livelihood. In fact, the extinction of wildlife and the disturbance of the ecological cycle might lead to more devastation and trap all living things in a vicious circle.

However, there are several actions government and individuals may take to safeguard natural resources. The first and most crucial step is educating the public through TV shows and school lessons on the value of natural resources for both people and wild animals. As a result, individuals will begin to understand that wasting too many resources contributes to the destruction of their own homes. Governments can also enact the required laws to restrict and control how businesses and people use their resources. For instance, governments may demand more taxes from businesses that use more resources than is typical.

In summary, overuse of natural resources can upset the delicate balance of the ecosystem, hasten the loss of animal habitats, and result in a severe scarcity of mineral resources. However, this impact may be significantly diminished by increasing public knowledge and engaging in personal environmental responsibility.

Sample 6:

The rapid depletion of natural resources, such as petroleum, forests, and freshwater, is a pressing global issue that demands immediate attention. This unsustainable consumption poses numerous problems for both the environment and human society. In this essay, we will discuss the problems caused by the overexploitation of natural resources and explore potential solutions to address these challenges.

One significant problem caused by the depletion of natural resources is environmental degradation. Extraction activities, such as mining and drilling for oil, often result in habitat destruction, soil erosion, and water pollution. For instance, the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest not only leads to the loss of valuable biodiversity but also contributes to climate change by reducing the Earth's capacity to absorb carbon dioxide. Moreover, overexploitation of freshwater sources leads to water scarcity and can have severe consequences for ecosystems and human populations, as witnessed in regions such as the Middle East and parts of Africa.

The depletion of natural resources also has adverse social and economic impacts. As resources become scarce, conflicts over access and control can arise, leading to geopolitical tensions and even wars. For example, disputes over oil reserves have fueled conflicts in several regions worldwide, resulting in political instability and human suffering. 

To tackle the problems caused by the consumption of natural resources, proactive measures need to be taken. One crucial solution is the promotion of sustainable practices and the transition to renewable energy sources. Governments and industries should invest in research and development to advance renewable technologies such as solar and wind power. By shifting away from fossil fuels, we can reduce carbon emissions, mitigate climate change, and alleviate the pressure on depleting resources. Countries like Germany and Denmark have made significant strides in renewable energy adoption and serve as models for sustainable development.

Furthermore, effective resource management and conservation strategies are vital. This includes implementing strict regulations on deforestation, establishing protected areas, and promoting responsible mining practices. Collaboration between governments, industries, and local communities is crucial to ensure the sustainable use of resources and the preservation of ecosystems. 

In conclusion, the alarming rate at which natural resources are being consumed poses significant problems for the environment, society, and the economy. Environmental degradation, conflicts, and economic instability are among the consequences of this unsustainable exploitation. However, by promoting sustainable practices, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and implementing effective resource management strategies, we can address these challenges and strive towards a more sustainable future.

Sample 7:

With the ever-increasing population in the world and rapid industrial growth, the consumption of natural resources like oil, trees and freshwater is ever-growing and though those resources are limited and non-renewable in many cases, we have taken very few steps to prevent the overuse of those invaluable resources. As a result, catastrophic outcomes are obvious, and we should take every possible measure to solve these problems.

The reservation of oil and freshwater is limited, and overconsumption of these resources will exhaust their stocks. When the oil reservation goes down, nations will fight over it. Production and mobilisation will be hampered due to the scarcity of fuel. Freshwater is another big area of concern as it is a critical issue for the living organism and less than 3% of water reservation on the earth is fresh water. Freshwater resources are depleting fast, and this will cause our living on the earth to be impossible. As most countries are trying to improve their economic conditions through industrialisation, we are imposing an unbearable burden on the natural ecosystem. This increasing rate of consumption threatens our very existence on Earth.

All nations and every individual should put their best effort to combat this problem. It is a global issue and hence should be addressed globally. Moreover, every government should ensure adequate legislations and strict laws to prevent the over-consumption of important natural resources. Factories, mills and industries should not be allowed to contaminate water and should be severely fined if found guilty. Furthermore, strict monitoring of logging activity should be in place and the plantation of trees should be encouraged. Along with government initiatives, individual efforts to address this problem should also be in place.

In conclusion, I would reiterate that important natural resources like water, oil, and forests should not be exploited, and individual and government initiatives can reduce the problems caused by the overuse of those resources to a great extent. If we fail to do that, the consequence would be too severe to control.

Sample 8:

Humanity’s growing consumption of natural resources has raised an alarm for the whole world, because the consequences will be devastating for the future of human beings. To resolve this issue, both short-term actions and long-term planning will be required.

Obviously, resource depletion makes the Earth environment suffer from a series of damage, such as loss of forest cover, soil erosion, increased flooding, and drought. These problems all contribute to the change in world climate, leading to further concerns like global warming and extreme weather. Due to these changes, the Earth is now at a critical point where the life of all species is in danger, including human beings. Increasing resource extraction does not just lead to environmental problems but is also associated with social issues such as human rights violations and poor working conditions. These negative social impacts are most strongly felt in regions with low environmental and social standards, including Africa, Latin America and Asia.

In order to continue to thrive on this planet, the international community should join hands towards a common international objective of how consumption, as well as exploitation, can be reduced. For now, it might be necessary to set a limit on the number of resources, such as water, that can be used for domestic and industrial purposes. In particular, for the regions with high levels of per-capita resource use, they will need to sharply decrease their resource use in absolute terms. In the long run, renewables, such as solar and wind power, can be explored more and utilized to reduce the dependency on fossil fuels. Companies can, for instance, be trained in lean manufacturing, while consumers are sensitized on how to adopt re-use, reducing wastage, and recycling techniques.

In conclusion, if humans continue to excessively consume natural resources, we will possibly find it too late to make any difference one day. The lifestyle of individuals and the conduct of business will need to become more sustainable, with collaborative efforts of governments and the public.

Sample 9:

It has been argued that certain natural resources are being depleted in an unsustainable manner. This can result in serious issues which require certain solutions to be implemented.

Foremost among these problems is the overreliance on oil resources and subsequent lack of them. This could pose a variety of problems like power shortages and a lack of material for various processes including plastic manufacture. If these issues occur, they could result in deaths when hospitals lose power and suffer from a poor supply of spare components for machinery which could cause accidents. Similarly, an unsustainable loss of timber due to logging or deforestation can cause a shortage of building materials with a corresponding lack of shelter contributing to poverty and homelessness. Lastly, the depletion of freshwater can lead to severe dehydration and potentially starvation since freshwater is used in crop production in addition to other production methods. All of these problems can occur within countries but could also provoke conflicts between nations if they resort to military force in order to secure access to the remaining resources.

Despite the severity of the aforementioned problems, there is a variety of solutions. In terms of addressing the oil issues, it may be possible to use more alternative sources such as solar or wind power and recycle current oil-based products. This could help reduce the dependence on this fossil fuel and extend existing resources. A similar strategy may be used when considering overlogging or deforestation; alternatives to wood-based products could be used and existing goods could be recycled when no longer in use. Unfortunately, these strategies cannot be applied to the water overuse issue. Instead, new sources of water should be found and new methods of freshwater extraction such as desalination need to be implemented on a wider scale.

In conclusion, shortage issues concerning oil, timber, and water seem insurmountable and can have serious consequences. However, there are various ways of resolving them such as utilising renewable sources and building more desalination plants.

Sample 10:

In the contemporary world, the nonstop consumption of natural resources such as oil, water, and forests poses serious issues, prompting immediate attention from both society and government.

One considerable problem that arises from increased usage of these resources is environmental degradation, an egregious example being pollution. As a result of modern consumerism, individuals often disregard their older items, preferring instead to purchase newer goods. This tendency has brought about a significant surge in waste production that, in turn, gravely affects our environment. Moreover, as the demand for certain resources escalates, their prices also skyrocket due to scarcity, which puts them out of reach for consumers of lower economic status, negatively impacting their quality of life.

To mitigate these concerns, both individuals and nations need to develop a more sustainable approach to resource consumption. Exploring alternative energy sources may represent a viable solution, as they not only prevent the depletion of natural resources but also minimize carbon footprints compared to traditional fossil fuel usage. Through implementing appropriate policies, governments can regulate and discourage the overexploitation of resources like coal and natural gas. On the individual level, recycling and reusing products, as well as purchasing secondhand items, should be given more emphasis.

In summary, unsustainable consumption of natural resources leads to numerous problems and it is through collective action that we can address these issues.

Sample 11:

Natural resources like fresh water, oil, and forests are diminishing faster, posing a threat to the future. If we continue to consume these resources simultaneously, we will be deprived quickly. This essay will highlight the multiple issues arising from resource depletion and measures we can take to combat the challenges. 

The extensive use of resources impacts the environment in multiple ways. The decline of water resources will pose a threat to all living beings. There will be drought everywhere, and humans won’t be able to do agriculture and maintain necessities. Similarly, the heavy oil consumption will create a significant setback for the future as we rely heavily on it. Cutting down the trees will disturb the natural habitats. The topmost layer of the soil will also get washed away by water easily. Many animal species heavily depend on the forests, and they will all become endangered soon.  

The first thing we should do to mitigate this challenge is to use these scarce resources carefully. The Government should also make some laws to use these resources sustainably. They can create plans to encourage citizens to use renewable resources like wind and solar energy. The government can also lay down the laws for factories that should not discharge the chemicals directly into the river. We can also encourage planting more trees to balance our ecosystem. 

The rapid usage of resources can bring multitudes of challenges for us. But if we raise awareness, make rules, and encourage the usage of renewable resources, then we can fix it. We need to use them carefully to make them available for future generations.  

Sample 12:

The universal phenomenon of excessive consumption of natural resources actually remains a subject of public interest and concern. The objective of this essay is to outline both the potential problems of this negative tendency and appropriate ways of dealing with it.

Consuming considerable resources will cause inevitable environmental pollution. The low efficiency of resources use in factories may aggravate this problem. One of the best solutions may be encouraging companies to adopt more eco-friendly equipment, making optimal use of materials. Meanwhile, local governments can enact stricter environment-protection standards to normalize the enterprise operations.

In addition, since available natural resources are quite limited on the earth, the overuse of these restricted resources will worsen the shortage of natural materials and lower people's standard of living indirectly. It is well-recognized that only a few natural resources can be used directly in our daily life. For example, the drinkable water accounts for just less than 1% of all the world water resources. Also, to meet the basic needs of people, some alternative materials have been invented when some resources are in short supply. For instance, artificial cotton, a material which is made from rice straw, has replaced cotton in the clothing industry in recent years. However, clothes made of artificial cotton are definitely not as comfortable as the natural ones. Wearing these clothes means a lower life quality for some people to some extent. To address this problem, people should develop a more active attitude towards economizing resources, leading a low carbon life.

To summarize, consuming natural resources at an increasing rate may pose a threat to the environment and people's lives. Business, governments and society should work together to solve these problems.

Sample 13:

Human beings have been consuming a large number of natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water. This essay will analyze the problems brought by this phenomenon, and then give some solutions to these problems.

The huge consumption of natural resources will lead to issues related to sustainability. The first issue is environmental pollution caused by burning fossil fuels. It is acknowledged that fossil fuels play a crucial role in many sectors such as power industries and transportation industries, and such factories will emit a large amount of gas during production. For example, nitrogen oxides will be released into the air, and this will bring about smog and acid rain, which harms the sustainability of the environment. The second issue is natural resource scarcity. The total amount of natural resources on the earth is fixed, and many resources are not renewable, especially if human beings consume some resources excessively. Taking forests as an example, when large forests continue to disappear because of human activities, it is quite difficult for human beings to reverse the deforestation trend then. As a result, the future generations may not have sufficient resources, and their quality of life will be degraded inevitably.

To tackle these problems, it is necessary for countries to utilize alternative energies. When fossil fuels are substituted by new clean energies such as solar, wind, and geothermal power, the amount of toxic gas emitted will significantly reduce. Of course, promoting the use of new clean energies still requires the intervention of governments, because they can encourage enterprises to develop and use alternative energies by providing subsidies. In addition, raising citizens’awareness of sustainability can function effectively. NGOs may improve citizens' understanding for sustainability through holding more activities, and when citizens have a stronger sense of environmental protection, they will try to prevent enterprises from excessively consuming natural resources. There may be more environmental campaigns initiated by responsible individuals or groups worldwide, and these campaigns will urge governments to pose stricter limits on enterprises’resource consumption.

In conclusion, consuming natural resources at an alarming rate will lead to sustainability issues such as environmental contamination and resource scarcity. To deal with these problems, governments should enforce policies to promote the use of alternative energies, and involving more citizens’into the environmental campaigns will also help to restrict enterprises’energy-consuming behavior.

Sample 14:

The world's natural resources are declining at a rapid rate. As the consumption of the world's natural resources such as oil, water and others is increasing at an alarming rate. In this essay, we will discuss why the demand is so high and the solution to this problem.

First, one of the main reasons for the increasing demand for natural resources is overpopulation. Due to population growth, the demand for petroleum, water and other resources has increased sharply in many countries. For example, in India, the demand for oil has been increasing continuously since 1990. It is due to the constantly growing population. Apart from India, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and other South American countries are facing the problem of demand for non-renewable resources. Due to the increasing population, many countries are facing this problem to reduce their dependence on non-renewable energy.

However, to solve this problem, we can increase the use of renewable energy such as solar power plants, wind power, water power, electric vehicles and many others. These natural sources of energy, like the sun or wind, can give you more energy and can get it back again. For example, China has about 150 km of solar power plants covered in the area, helping to power 1000 homes. In addition, India has built the largest windmill by supplying electricity to more than 900 homes. With the help of renewable energy, we can solve the problem of overpopulation.

To conclude, although resource consumption has increased at a high rate just because of a population revolt, by renewable energy we can reduce our dependence on natural resources.

Sample 15:

The rapid consumption of natural resources like oil, forests, and fresh water poses significant dangers to our planet. The depletion of these resources can lead to severe environmental, economic, and social consequences. In this essay, I will discuss the potential dangers of resource overconsumption and suggest measures to mitigate these risks.

Firstly, it is crucial to understand the adverse effects of depleting natural resources. Overconsumption of oil, for instance, not only accelerates climate change due to increased greenhouse gas emissions but also risks economic stability as countries become dependent on finite supplies. Similarly, deforestation leads to habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of the carbon cycle, exacerbating global warming. Freshwater scarcity affects agriculture, human health, and can lead to conflicts over water access. For example, in my hometown, extensive deforestation for agriculture has led to frequent flooding and loss of biodiversity, showcasing the immediate impact of resource mismanagement. Therefore, it is evident that the unchecked consumption of these resources threatens both the environment and human societies.

On the other hand, effective measures can be taken to mitigate these dangers. One key approach is to adopt sustainable practices such as reducing oil consumption by investing in renewable energy sources like solar and wind power. Additionally, reforestation projects and the enforcement of strict logging regulations can help restore forest cover. Water conservation techniques, including efficient irrigation and wastewater recycling, can alleviate freshwater shortages. Personally, I have participated in community-led tree planting initiatives that not only revived local ecosystems but also raised awareness about the importance of environmental stewardship. By implementing these strategies, we can significantly reduce the negative impacts of resource overconsumption.

In conclusion, the excessive consumption of natural resources poses severe threats to the environment and human well-being. However, through the adoption of sustainable practices and concerted efforts to conserve resources, these dangers can be mitigated. It is imperative that we take immediate action to preserve our natural resources for future generations.

Sample 1:

There has been a shifting trend of fathers staying at home to nurture and provide for the kids while the mother earns the bread in recent times. I feel this is a monumental change in a positive direction, given that the 21st century has provided a platform for change, which a lot of people have embraced.

To begin with, the traditional bounds were that the mother would stay at home and nurture the kids while the father would work. This system became redundant and arbitrary as the world progressed. In the erstwhile days, women were barred from work as they were wrongly considered to be inferior to men in certain aspects. But these shackles have since been broken. Now, women have the opportunity to earn more than their male counterparts. As a result, they go out while the father works from home or at home as someone is needed to care for the young ones. This change is quite refreshing as men play their part to nurture the family, no matter what that role might be.

Fathers staying at home doesn’t just allow a mother to fulfil her career-oriented dreams but also takes a lot of loads off her as motherhood is a daunting task. For instance, with the father taking care of the family, the mother can catch up with old friends, go out for a refreshing walk, learn a new hobby or skill, or take a much-warranted nap. This change is possible as a sense of equality is being instilled among the people and they realize that sharing responsibilities develops stronger bonds.

However, there might be a few drawbacks to this. For instance, a father’s nurturance will never triumph over that of a mother’s. Furthermore, climbing up the corporate ladder means making a lot of sacrifices which often include moving around from place to place, working late hours successively and tremendous tension on the employee. It is observed that women tend not to make such choices as they feel the family might be affected. But all in all, this sea change shows the progression of the society which previously deemed women unfit for work and that a man should take equal responsibility in a household. Thus, we can take pride in becoming a unified, welcoming and progressive society in general.

To summarise, this trend is witnessed in a time when the most capable person stakes claim to the job, irrespective of their gender. Also, the concept of online offices has aided greatly. Hence, it should be taken as a positive step and should flourish further.

Sample 2:

In today’s modern era, the conventional gender roles are undergoing a paradigm shift, with mothers becoming the primary breadwinners of the family and fathers staying at home to look after their children. This situation has emerged as a result of a lot of factors, and I feel it is indicative of a positive trend. 

To begin with, one of the key reasons could be that, in the twenty-first century, females are equally educated and demanding as their male counterparts due to increased access to educational and professional opportunities. The equal rights movement, often known as gender equality, has had a tremendous impact on women’s empowerment, resulting in mothers working in offices while fathers stay home to look after their children. Several western countries have socially welcomed this trend, but other developing Asian countries have yet to fully embrace it. Apart from that, the modern era’s financial problem has compelled parents to look for employment in order to cover their living expenses. Thus, the parents eventually decide who will make money for the family and who will look after their children regardless of society or traditional ideas.

With the changing environment, the socio-economic aspect of parenting is also changing, with fathers staying at home to care for children. At the same time, mothers go out to work, which is a sign of positive development because, in the past, men were required to be breadwinners while women were denied the opportunity to work outside the kitchen. However, a large number of women today hold prestigious positions in well-known organisations. As a result, women are capable of becoming self-sufficient and working alongside men in any industry. For instance, a large number of industries are driven by women in human resources management, nursing, hospital, banking, teaching etc. Therefore, the increase in the number of employment opportunities in different fields has led women to become the family’s breadwinners.

To sum up, considerable shifts in social beliefs and women’s advancement have altered family roles. As a result, the changing trend has more positive outcomes than negatives, and it should be regarded as a positive step forward because real growth is impossible until men and women cooperate and have equal opportunities.

Sample 3:

The traditional belief that men are breadwinners while women should take care of chores and up bring children is no longer true in the modern era. In many places, this convention has gone to a reverse way and an increasing number of women work outside and men stay at home. There are several reasons for this, and I personally think that it is a positive trend.

With the changes in social belief, more parents send their daughters for higher studies instead of preparing them for getting married and this enhances the capable and educated women workforce. In many fields, for example, telemarketing, teaching, fashion design, and banking, women are doing better than men, and this has created a demand for female employees in the job market. The equal right movement has had a great impact on empowering women, and this has become quite normal for mothers to work at offices while the fathers decide to stay at home to take care of their children. This decision is often based on mutual understanding of the couples and the one who has the higher earning potential decides to work to support the increasing expenses of the family. This has been socially accepted in most of the developed countries though some developing countries in Asia are yet to completely accept this trend.

In my opinion, this trend has more positive outcomes and should be treated as progress. If both genders do not work hand in hand and do not get equal opportunities, real progress would be impossible. This ensures that we live in an era when both men and women have an equal opportunity, and someone is not deprived of a great career or a big opportunity only because of her gender. It is a great chance that allows the parents to decide who to earn money for the family and who to take care of the family, not based on social and traditional belief.

In conclusion, the changing roles in a family have been possible due to the great changes in social belief, advancement of women, especially in education and this is a very positive trend that eliminates the gender discrimination and advocates the equal rights.

Sample 4:

With the socio-economic development, breadwinner fathers and stay-at-home mothers are on a decline. There are many causes behind this trend and in my opinion, this could be considered as a positive change rather than negative.

It is undeniable that the global economy is going down. Many men workers have been sacked, and as a consequence, they stay at home, do household chores and take care of children. At the same time, women are more encouraged to work, by the government policies such as maternity leave, high salaries, and shortened the working hours. Another reason why husband role has been changed in recent years is the acceptance of the society for them to become nannies instead of going to work and support the family.

Personally, I think this change in father’s and mother’s traditional role could have many benefits. Firstly, in many cases mothers have better qualifications and job opportunities than their partners, so it seems more sensible for them to go out to work. Secondly, if fathers stay at home and look after children, it would become an important contribution in their children's upbringing, which could play a vital role in children’s future when they become teenagers and face problems that would be hard for mothers to handle. For example, it is rare to find boys or girls who have a close relationship with their fathers and are making trouble or unsuccessful in their lives.

In conclusion, there are different reasons why fathers are becoming more responsible for taking care of children while mothers are busy with the financial support of the family. And I believe this could be useful for the whole family. 

Sample 5:

It has been seen for decades that male has always been a dominating figure in the society.  Today's world offers equal opportunities to both men and women. Therefore, it is common to see nowadays that more fathers are staying at home and raising children while mothers have become the bread earners. Whatever may be the reasons, I am completely against this trend and to me, it brings more of negativity than positivity.

To start with, one of the causes could be that females today are equally educated and demanding as males. Females have the potential to be independent and walk along with the men in every field. Companies today, seek to hire more females for jobs that are less physically demanding, thereby leaving fewer options for men. Secondly, in some Middle Eastern countries like UAE and Qatar, females are preferred over males, because these countries look for woman empowerment. Finally, in cases where the wife holds a higher qualification, she, with mutual understanding and discussion with the husband works so that they can earn more and have a better life.

However, according to me, this brings negative development to the society. Children in their growing age need more love and care, which they can get from by mothers. Females have that natural instinct to provide comfort and care. Fathers, how much ever they try, cannot put the values that a mother can incorporate into a child. Hence, this affects the upbringing of children. Furthermore, fathers cannot cope with both household tasks and look after the kids. On the other hand, females are said to be multitaskers.

To summarise, I do not want to say that females should not work at all, but of course, not at the cost of nurturing their children. There are women who do part time jobs and look after the family as well. Nevertheless, in my view, this trend should not be continued as it has more drawbacks and brings negativity.

Sample 6:

In modern times the traditional gender roles are changing rapidly, resulting in more fathers staying at home looking after their offspring and mothers becoming the main breadwinners in the family. There are numerous causes for this, and I think it’s a step in the right direction.

In the past few decades, there have been numerous women’s movements, as a result of which conventional gender roles have gone through a paradigm shift. Although this equality was only acquired after long hard battles fought by women’s right groups against the misogynist practices that existed a few decades ago. Furthermore, in past few decades, we also had a fair share of men’s movements whose main aim was to make men get in touch with their feminine side rather than feel ashamed and disgusted with it.

Nonetheless in many parts of the world and in fact in the minds of many people across the globe, such a family system is considered to be an insult to a man’s masculinity, but I beg to differ with this school of thought. In my view, it is a blessing to be living in a time in history where both males and females can choose to take on whatever role they decree. And since it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that women can do most jobs just as good, if not better than their male counterparts there’s nothing wrong with mothers taking on roles that are traditionally thought to be men-oriented.

All in all, due to successful women’s and men’s movements deep into the last millennia, genders roles are getting swapped, and I am of strong opinion that these changes are a blessing.

Sample 7:

Nowadays it is common in many families where mothers are breadwinners for the family, while the father takes on the role of raising the children. A number of factors have led to this situation, I regard it as a positive trend.

On the one hand, in today's society, parents have had to adapt to several changes. Firstly, owing to the advancement of equal rights movements, 21st century's ladies have greater access to educational and professional opportunities which in turn create a situation where women can lead to gain qualifications and pursue a career. Secondly, on the basis of their personalities, to certain kinds of professions such as human resource management, nursing and teaching which are primarily driven by women. For example, in a hospital, more female nurses are recruited due to the fact women tend to more patience and caring to look after patients. Finally, the rising of living which means both marriage partners need to have a job to support the family, therefore, it may depend on the personal preference of each partner, who will take the role of breadwinner and who will take on the role of upbringing children, or based on which partner earns the most money.

On the other hand, in my opinion, this trend could create a profound influence not only in the societies but among the families as well. Having househusband, men can realise the arduous job of his wife that make him more respectable toward her. In addition, it could make harmony and understanding between spouses which positively affects the children as well. Last but not least, there is always a chance to get back to the traditional professions of men and women if they feel bored as seeking a change.

In conclusion, the changing of gender roles is beneficial to the family as well as society and this trend is greatly acceptable.

Sample 8:

It is clear that the role of mothers to maintain their children has been replaced by fathers in many areas. There are plenty of reasons why this can be, and I am pretty sure that it is a good evolution.

For me, a mother’s choice to leave her baby to her husband can happen due to various reasons. Firstly, the man might have wider knowledge about how to maintain the baby correctly and effectively than his life partner has. Hence, it is likely to be a wise idea if he obtains the full responsibility of taking care of their children. Furthermore, the agreement created before entering marriage life also can be a cause. My sister as an example, before she and her future husband decided to get marriage, they made an appointment that the husband would look after their children as my sister earned much more money than he did. Looking at this example, it seems that the economic factor indirectly is one of the reasons. Traditionally settled marriage is declining while people are choosing their life partners. This leads to a phenomenon that women are no longer bound to take care of their children and do household works. If they have better potential, they do office jobs or run a business and that leaves the father to stay at home.

In my opinion, it is a positive evolution if the female works and the male stay at home to maintain their children. This is mainly because it is likely to be a distinct proof showing that the position of both genders is the same. In addition, it can destroy a traditional assumption revealing that the husband who should earn money for the family and the wife should be a full-time housewife. This issue also reveals that each couple seemly has different rules in order to create their finest family.

In a nutshell, knowledge and arrangement might be the factors why mothers leave their kids to the father, and it seems to me that it is a good trend.

Sample 9:

It is true that men are increasingly likely to take on the role of househusband, while more women than ever are the breadwinners in their families. There could be several reasons for this, and I consider it to be a very positive trend. 

In recent years, parents have had to adapt to various changes in our societies. Equal rights movements have made great progress, and it has become normal for women to gain qualifications and pursue a career. It has also become socially acceptable for men to stay at home and look after their children. At the same time, the rising cost of living has meant that both marriage partners usually need to work and save money before starting a family. Therefore, when couples have children, they may decide who works and who stays at home depending on the personal preference of each partner, or based on which partner earns the most money. 

In my view, the changes described above should be seen as progress.  We should be happy to live in a society in which men and women have equal opportunities, and in which women are not put under pressure to sacrifice their careers. Equally, it seems only fair that men should be free to leave their jobs in order to assume childcare responsibilities if this is what they wish to do. Couples should be left to make their own decisions about which parental role each partner takes, according to their particular circumstances and needs. 

In conclusion, the changing roles of men and women in the family are a result of wider changes in society, and I believe that these developments are desirable.

Sample 10:

In the modern era, ancient gender roles are shifting very swiftly. As a result, more fathers are staying at home to care for their children, while more mothers are working. This is happening because women are equally educated and proficient as men. This contributes positively to society.

With the changes in society, parents have now opted to let their daughters pursue the education they desire. This has enabled them to have a higher position in companies. The females are now capable and very proficient. They are the leaders in some of the fields, such as teaching, human resources, banking, and fashion design. These have a higher demand for female employees than for male employees. Another reason may be a mutual decision made by the parents. If the mother has a higher-paid job, it can sustain their standard of living better, so the mother continues her job. For example, my aunt, who was in a management position, kept working while her husband, who had a lower-paying job, sacrificed and took care of their children.

This, in my opinion, has a positive impact on society and represents a step forward for the senior population. The role shifts break the regressive thinking of women staying at home and men working. Both genders collaborate, whether to raise a child, provide for the family, or earn a living. When men stay at home and do everything their spouse does on a daily basis, they realise how tedious and strenuous their job is.

To conclude, the roles being changed between the parents are due to advancements in ideologies and manpower demand. It has a positive effect on society, bringing about a change in traditional and orthodox thinking.

Sample 11:

Nowadays, fathers are increasingly choosing to stay at home and care for their children rather than seek employment, while mothers continue to work and earn. Some men do this for financial reasons, while others do it for personal reasons. This can be considered a very positive trend because of the benefits it brings.

In recent years, there have been a variety of changes occurring that parents have had to adapt to. Women, like men, can obtain education and qualifications and pursue a career. Society has gradually come to accept that men can stay at home to care for their children. Along with changes in society, the standard of living has also risen in regard to how the parents decide on the breadwinner. Therefore, the couple jointly decides who should take care of the children. For instance, my cousin’s wife earned almost double his salary; hence, they decided for her to continue working while he stayed home.

In my opinion, these changes are progressive and beneficial for society. People are quite content to live in a community where men and women have equal rights and opportunities. It also benefits women in particular, as they are able to follow their aspirations and dreams. This is beneficial for children as well; for instance, research has found that children raised by fathers tend to have better emotional stability and social skills.

To conclude, the core idea of family and the role of parents is changing in the contemporary era based on the advancement in society and the abilities possessed by individuals. This has been shown to be positive because there are more benefits for society and its members.

Sample 12:

There is a change in the role of parents. Traditionally, mothers took care of children while fathers worked. However, now the roles are reversed. This occurred due to the movements and agendas carried out for the empowerment of women. I believe this has a negative impact due to the effects it leaves on men’s mental health.

The feminist group has carried out a number of movements and agendas in order to achieve gender equality in the workplace. This has brought about equality between the sexes in all environments. As a result, fathers are now responsible for raising their children, while mothers work. Along with that, companies have now understood the efficiency and progress they can achieve with the help of women. creating a prominent demand for female employees. This has led to mothers being able to work while their partners take care of the children.

Contrary to the reasons for change, its impact is not favourable. A mother's natural instincts are to provide more love, care, and tender handling for her children. When fathers care for their children, they frequently overlook the details and give things a rough once-over with care and tender handling. This is lacking when fathers care for their children; they tend to ignore the details and give things a rough touch. Along with that, society still does not accept this change and often labels men as "useless" and many other things. This leaves a dent in their mental health, which deteriorates gradually.

To conclude, the changes in the roles of parents have occurred due to the change in ideologies brought about by the propaganda of feminists. This has brought about more negatives than benefits.

Sample 13:

Lately, society has witnessed a significant shift in family dynamics, with an increasing number of fathers staying at home as caregivers while mothers act as breadwinners. This trend is driven by a number of influences, and I generally believe it to be positive, despite some misgivings.

There are a few reasons to explain this development. Firstly, in families where the woman earns vastly more than the man does, flexible childcare arrangements would make sense. If a single source of income is enough for the household, the mother can work while her husband stays at home and cares for their young. The child, as a result, can receive a proper upbringing but the family can still sustain itself financially. The aforementioned development, in addition, is supported by a belief that women are entitled to pursuing their careers without the added pressure of being the primary caregiver. A flexible distribution of domestic and professional responsibilities would foster respect towards women's aspirations, while nurturing egalitarian relationships.

Despite some concerns against this trend, I believe that it is ultimately positive. In a way similar to households where men are the sole breadwinners, having women in that role is criticized for underutilizing both parents in the workforce. As a consequence, the family’s income would be burdened if either parent, for some reason, is unable to work at full capacity. There is, however, a benefit in empowering fathers to play an intimate role in their children’s development, which was historically mothers’ responsibility. As fathers’ engagement with their young is different from that of mothers, they can forge crucial bonds with their offspring. One would be greatly advantaged to receive a lot of time together with their fathers during their upbringing.

In conclusion, the increasing number of stay-at-home fathers is a result of shifting family dynamics and social beliefs. While this trend can be seen as detrimental to household finances, the opportunities for balanced parenting let me affirm that it is largely positive.

Sample 14:

In contemporary society, many fathers are choosing to stay home and care for their children while mothers pursue careers outside the home. This shift challenges traditional gender roles and raises questions about its implications for families and society. This essay explores the reasons behind this trend and evaluates whether it represents a positive or negative development.

The primary reason for this evolving family dynamic is the changing landscape of gender roles. As societal norms continue to evolve, there is a growing recognition of the importance of gender equality in both professional and domestic spheres. Fathers taking on caregiving roles challenge stereotypes and contribute to a more equitable distribution of responsibilities within families.

Furthermore, economic factors play a significant role in this trend. With the rising cost of living in many urban areas, dual-income households have become necessary for financial stability. Mothers often may have career aspirations, while fathers may prioritise caregiving over traditional career pursuits.

From a positive perspective, this trend fosters enhanced parental involvement and bonding with children. Research shows that fathers' involvement in child-rearing improves children's cognitive and social skills. Moreover, it allows mothers to pursue career goals without compromising family well-being, promoting overall family resilience and harmony.

In conclusion, more fathers staying home to care for children while mothers work signifies a move towards gender equality and shared parenting. This shift meets economic needs and enhances family bonds, fostering stronger parent-child relationships. Despite these challenges, the overall impact is positive, signalling progress towards valuing caregiving roles regardless of gender. This development marks a significant stride towards a more equitable and inclusive future.

Sample 15:

Recently, there has been a significant transition in family dynamics, with an increasing number of fathers assuming the role of primary caregivers while mothers become the primary providers. This shift is influenced by various factors, and I generally view it positively, despite some reservations.

There are several reasons for this change. First and foremost, in households where the woman earns significantly more than the man, flexible childcare arrangements make sense. If one income is sufficient for the family's needs, the mother can pursue her career while the father stays home to care for their young ones. This arrangement ensures proper child-rearing while maintaining financial stability. Moreover, this shift is supported by the belief that women have the right to pursue their careers without the added burden of being the primary caregiver. A flexible distribution of domestic and professional responsibilities would promote respect for women's career aspirations while fostering egalitarian relationships.

Despite some concerns about this trend, I believe it is ultimately positive. Similar to households where men are the sole breadwinners, the critique of women in that role is seen as underutilizing both parents in the workforce. Consequently, if either parent cannot work at full capacity, the family's income could be affected. However, empowering fathers to play an active role in their children's upbringing, traditionally the mother's responsibility, has its benefits. As fathers engage with their children differently than mothers do, they can foster important bonds with their offspring. Children greatly benefit from spending ample time with their fathers during their formative years.

In conclusion, the increasing number of stay-at-home fathers reflects shifting family dynamics and evolving social norms. While some may view this trend as detrimental to household finances, the opportunity for balanced parenting leads me to assert that it is largely positive.

Sample 16:

It is becoming increasingly common for fathers to be primary caretakers while wives develop their careers. I believe this is because of a societal shift in gender relations and it is a positive development.

The most obvious cause of more women in the workplace is modern gender relations. As recently as the 1950s in the United States, it was the unquestioned role of women to cook, clean, and look after the children. Many progressive women began to feel that they were more than their biological prerogative and feminism movements sprouted up in the 1960s. There have been years of struggle, and the wage gap is still a hotly debated issue, but now most reasonable adults accept that both men and women should have equal opportunity to pursue a career.

On the whole, I believe this is a positive development because women can contribute greatly to society. Since women have come into the workforce en masse there are countless examples of high performing professionals including CEOs like Shery Sandberg, athletes like Serena Williams, and authors like Margaret Atwood. That belies the impact of millions of women performing well in the average job. A company meeting a few decades ago might have been more one-sided in its male dominated viewpoints, but now it is likely to showcase more female viewpoints. This added perspective is one key to creative thinking and greatly enhances decision-making and the resultant products and services of many companies.

In conclusion, the advent of women in the workforce has brought great benefits to the world. The pertinent question is now how quickly all parts of the world will adopt these progressive improvements.

Sample 17:

In contemporary society, a noticeable shift has occurred in family dynamics, with an increasing number of fathers assuming the role of primary caregivers, while mothers pursue professional careers. This essay argues that this trend is driven by evolving gender perceptions and economic necessities, and overall, represents a positive progression in societal norms.

Traditionally, caregiving and homemaking were roles predominantly assigned to women, but the modern era has seen a significant shift towards gender equality. This change has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of paternal involvement in child-rearing for the emotional and psychological development of children. Studies have shown that children benefit from the unique perspectives and parenting styles fathers bring to the familial unit, fostering a more rounded and inclusive upbringing. Moreover, the economic landscape has transformed, necessitating dual-income households in many parts of the world. As women have gained greater access to education and career opportunities, families have become more flexible in their approach to work and caregiving, leading to a more equitable distribution of domestic responsibilities.

Furthermore, this emerging trend effectively challenges and begins to dismantle the deeply entrenched stereotypes surrounding traditional gender roles, actively promoting a more egalitarian society. By fully recognizing and valuing the contributions of both parents in every aspect of family life, including the critical role of caregiving, societies are making significant strides towards achieving greater gender parity. This pivotal shift not only empowers women to pursue their careers without the undue guilt traditionally associated with "neglecting" family duties but also enables men to actively engage in and derive profound fulfillment from the nurturing aspects of parenthood, aspects which were historically deemed exclusive to women, thus enriching the family dynamic.

In conclusion, the shift towards fathers as primary caregivers represents positive societal progress, advocating for a more equitable distribution of family roles. This change fosters a supportive and inclusive family environment, contributing significantly to gender equality and enhancing the quality of family life.

Sample 18:

The evolving family structure, marked by an increasing number of fathers taking on the primary caregiving role as mothers venture into the workforce, is a manifestation of shifting societal norms and economic imperatives. This essay posits that such a trend is fueled by the pursuit of gender equality and financial stability and asserts that it represents a positive development in fostering inclusive family dynamics.

The drive towards gender equality has significantly influenced this shift, vigorously challenging traditional norms that once strictly confined women to domestic spaces and men to the role of breadwinners. As societal attitudes progressively evolve, there is a growing appreciation and recognition for the shared responsibilities in both parenting and financial provisioning within families. This meaningful transition not only robustly supports women's career aspirations, liberating them from the guilt historically associated with pursuing professional goals, but also significantly enriches men's involvement in child-rearing. By wholeheartedly embracing these roles, fathers actively contribute to a more holistic and enriched family environment, where children receive diverse forms of love, guidance, and care, fostering a well-rounded upbringing.

Economically, the necessity for dual incomes in many households has catalyzed this transformative change. As living costs continue to escalate, families increasingly rely on both parents contributing financially to meet their needs. This economic reality, coupled with a broader acceptance of diverse family models, has paved the way for more fathers to confidently step into roles traditionally seen as maternal. The positive repercussions of this shift include enhanced financial security for families and a more equitable sharing of domestic duties, leading to stronger familial bonds, mutual respect among family members, and a supportive atmosphere that celebrates shared responsibilities and contributions.

In summary, fathers becoming primary caregivers as mothers work reflects significant strides toward gender equality and economic stability. This shift benefits families by fostering balance and nurturing and supports wider societal progress towards inclusivity and fairness. These positive changes signal a future where family roles are chosen based on ability and preference, moving away from traditional gender norms.

Sample 19:

It has become a standard practice, specially in developed countries, fathers would stay at home and take care of their children. Though the skyrocketing cost of day care centres is forcing fathers to stay home to look after children, it has a far-reaching negative outcome, as it might breed an exhaustive mood that impacts familial affection.

Excessive childcare cost along with subsistence household earning is one of the major root causes behind the new trend of stay-at-home fathers. Most parents struggle to afford a babysitter to look after their children. As a result, they are forced to keep them in home care. Meanwhile, the majority of families live on both parents’ income, which presents them with no choice but to stay home alternatively. That means, to complement mothers’ absence, sometimes fathers are staying home to take care of their children, which is a relatively new development. In addition, some males have exceptional emotional attachment to their families, and that is why they decide to stay at home to look after for their loved ones.

However, this development is not free from some critical drawbacks, as it might cause an insidious damage in the stay-at-home father’s mind because this practice goes against most of the social stereotypes. In fact, fathers’ staying home is considered as a stigma in many societies. To put it specifically, only a handful number of people view that a child is better-off with a stay-at-home father. Which means this kind of fathers would face a high societal pressure which might demotivate them from joining this care giving practice. Even it can build a cumulative frustration in these fathers’ mind, which leads up to a severe detachment in the end.

To conclude, it is obvious from the discussion that the increasing care cost and fathers’ desire create a growing number of stay-at-home dads. At the same time, there is a necessity for us to pay more attention to the potential problems, such as reckless social judgements regarding this development.

Sample 20:

Nowadays, the phenomenon of house husbands is becoming less and less unusual. While some people may see this role reversal as somewhat strange and unnatural, in my view, given that more and more women are attending university and obtaining high paying jobs, it is a positive step forward as it gives them the same rights and opportunities as men.

Although in the past women in many countries were not encouraged to attend university, nowadays it is increasingly happening and means that some are attaining well-paid positions that allow men to carry out the woman’s traditional domestic role, and this is due to the greater recognition of women’s rights and gender equality. For instance, in Vietnam, the numbers of female university graduates are continually rising, enabling some to become CEOs of companies, such as Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo, the CEO of VietJet and, thus, allowing some husbands to stay at home and look after the children.

In terms of positive social change, this development is a real step forward for women’s rights since it gives them similar freedom and opportunities as men to pursue careers and achieve top level jobs. A good example is the likes of Angle Merkel in Germany and Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand, who have had the chance to become the leaders of their countries.

In conclusion, the changing roles of men and women as more females graduate from university represents real progress in terms of the equitable treatment of the sexes. If more of this continues, hopefully it will engender a greater respect for all minority groups around the world.

Sample 21:

In the contemporary epoch, men are solely responsible for raising their kids and other household chores, whereas women are employed and concentrating on their careers and accomplishments. However, I foster that it is a pessimistic approach, and I will elucidate my viewpoints from a different perspective with credible illustrations in the forthcoming stances.

Scrutinizing the given assertion and elaborating further, most mothers prefer to focus on their professional ambitions in this cutting-edge era. At the same time, men are fond of staying at home and looking after their children. This is due to the substantial recognition of female power and authority in workplaces. Many organizations have adopted the culture of providing managerial roles to women in order to promote women’s empowerment and are striving for them to reach remarkable endeavors in their professions. To exemplify, numerous conglomerate industries are providing massive advantages in terms of monetary incentives and high hikes to female workers. Conversely, men are not given such recognition despite their efforts which gradually leads to multiple psychological challenges and massively impacts their work. Men prefer to handle kids’ upbringing to avoid these mental issues, whereas ladies concentrate on their careers.

Probing ahead, this kind of culture impacts children’s mindset, which leads to a tremendously pessimistic vision of children, especially young boys. They will eventually assume that they don’t have to concentrate on their education since they would only have to focus on household duties in the future, and education is not critical for such chores. Furthermore, females might play a dominant role in the family, and men have to be dependent on them even for fundamental necessities. This gradually creates enormous misunderstandings in their lives, depriving them of happiness. Thus, there are a plethora of challenges when fathers only take care of their families rather than focusing on their careers.

Taking everything into consideration, there is a myriad of problems when only mothers take up influential positions in their occupations and fathers prefer to stay back at home. It has multiple drawbacks, and the following equality must forbid this type of practice at work and in personal lives.

Sample 22:

It is true that nowadays, the father stays at home to take care of the child and be the househusband, while the mother goes out to work to be the family’s breadwinner. I take it as a very positive trend.

With the change in social belief, more parents send their daughters out for higher studies rather than to prepare for marriage. Nowadays, women work in many different streams, and they have become very successful in that like, Telemarketing, Makeup artist, Fashion-designing, and many more they can work better than a man. Equal rights impacted women were empowering the world and creating more job opportunities for women. It is not easy for someone to adopt that woman must work, but some women do not care about this, and they quickly go to work, and this has become quite normal for the mother to go to work, and the father stays at home and takes care of the child. This decision is based on who is the higher earner in the family and who has the higher earning potential and decides to work and support the family’s expenses. Many developed countries have adopted this trend, and Asia is yet to adopt the trend ultimately.

It is a positive outcome and should be treated as progress. Real progress would be impossible if both genders get equal, did not get hand in hand, and were not provided with equal opportunity. It is time that whoever earns more money and has a secure carrier must run the house and other have to take care of the family, not based on social and traditional belief.

In conclusion, the changing roles in the family have been possible due to significant changes in social belief advancement of women, especially in education. This is a very positive trend that eliminates gender discrimination and advocates equal rights.

Sample 23:

In recent times, many fathers are choosing to be stay-at-home-dads while their wives pursue their careers. Some are making this choice for economic reasons and others simply because they want to. This essay will explore why this is happening and I will argue that it is a positive trend.

The most common reasons couples give for fathers choosing to stay at home are economic and personal choice. In many cases, the mothers can earn considerably more than the fathers and as a family they decide to take the higher income rather than think about outdated social norms. For example, my sister earns double her husband’s salary, therefore, she continued climbing the corporate ladder and her husband resigned from his factory job to raise the children. As a result, the family can now afford a beautiful house in Sydney and holidays twice a year.

The benefits of fathers staying at home are many. Obviously, the women benefit because they can follow their dreams and career aspirations. The fathers may be better suited to bringing up children and managing the home than working nine to five. As for the children, many studies show that they also benefit from the experience. For instance, research found that children raised by their fathers are emotionally balanced and tend to have better social skills. As a result, they grow up to have better connections with both mum and dad.

The idea of family is changing in modern times and families are making choices based on their own abilities and needs rather than what society dictates. I think it is a positive development.

Sample 24:

It is true that men are increasingly likely to take on the role of househusband, while more women than ever are the breadwinners in their families. There could be several reasons for this, and I consider it to be a very positive trend.

In recent years, parents have had to adapt to various changes in our societies. Equal rights movements have made great progress, and it has become normal for women to gain qualifications and pursue a career. It has also become socially acceptable for men to stay at home and look after their children. At the same time, the rising cost of living has meant that both marriage partners usually need to work and save money before starting a family. Therefore, when couples have children, they may decide who works and who stays at home depending on the personal preference of each partner, or based on which partner earns the most money.

In my view, the changes described above should be seen as progress. We should be happy to live in a society in which men and women have equal opportunities, and in which women are not put under pressure to sacrifice their careers. Equally, it seems only fair that men should be free to leave their jobs in order to assume childcare responsibilities if this is what they wish to do. Couples should be left to make their own decisions about which parental role each partner takes, according to their particular circumstances and needs.

In conclusion, the changing roles of men and women in the family are a result of wider changes in society, and I believe that these developments are desirable.

Sample 25:

Traditionally, fathers worked while mothers stayed at home to look after children. Gender roles have changed a lot nowadays. Women are no longer confined to cooking and looking after children just as much as men are longer restricted to being the sole breadwinner. Life has become a joint venture for couples where all responsibilities are shared.

Several factors contributed to this change. Increasing number of opportunites for women, lesser gender bias and willingness of men to stay at home have all contributed to this. More women are career oriented and are financially capable of taking care of the family without any contribution from the husband or partner. Fixed gender roles are challenged, and they are not clearly defined anymore. Other reasons for men to stay at home could be varied. Disability, job loss, vacation and fatigue could lead to stay-at-home fathers. This often occurs when the coules have children and one of the parents has to be home. One of them may wish to take a break from their busy careers for the family.

On the other hand, many conservative societies still have fixed gender roles where working women are frowned upon. They argue that women are naturally inclined to take care of children and that is how nature intended it to be while men were made to work and provide for the family. So, this could be a positive development for women but may not be good for the family as father's lack the mother's natural caring instincts. In the long run, it’s a positive development towards gender equality.

Sample 1:

Many today feel that countries should prioritise vocational training over higher education due to changes in the labour market. In my opinion, though there are strong economic reasons to support this idea, university education holds greater value.

Those in favour of more practical skills training point out the financial benefits. Most university graduates are burdened with student debt and face uncertain job prospects. In contrast, training schools are cheap, fast, and ease students into steady employment immediately. The jobs they train for are also most likely recession-proof and durable, including positions as cooks, hotel managers, and skilled technicians. Someone who is firmly established in such a job in their early 20s does not have to deal with the pressures associated with university life and its incumbent debts. Instead, they can begin to set aside money for a house or start a family.

Nonetheless, lacking a university degree limits one’s options. The jobs available will pay well initially and be secure but offer a narrow scope for advancement and virtually no opportunity to switch career paths. An individual with a university degree, on the other hand, might begin from a lower position but has a higher ceiling on future earnings. It is also possible for them to explore a variety of fields. Most good jobs require at least a bachelor’s degree even for simple internship vacancies. Lacking such a degree means restricting oneself to manual labour or service industry jobs. The actual learning that takes place at university, particularly for those with multi-disciplinary majors or studying at liberal arts schools, also encourages students to consider a wide range of possible career options.

In conclusion, increasing funding for vocational training is an attractive yet short-sighted approach that curbs possibilities. Governments ought to continue to support higher education even in dark economic times in order to reap future rewards.

Sample 2:

The perennial debate on whether nations should predominantly invest in vocational training over tertiary education ignites varied perspectives. This essay contends that while practical skills are imperative, the merits of university education cannot be undermined.

Primarily, proponents advocating spending more money on skills and vocational training underscore the immediate applicability of such skills in the workforce. Practical work tends to offer swift economic benefits, as it equips individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Contrastingly, those who support the motion to spend money on university education argue that higher education cultivates a more profound skill set, including critical thinking, analytical abilities, and versatility, which are indispensable in the dynamic global market. Universities act as incubators for professionals like engineers, doctors, and educators, whose roles cannot be understated. These institutions not only provide theoretical knowledge but also encourage research and development. A quintessential example would be the role university research plays in medical breakthroughs, which are fundamental to societal progression.

However, juxtaposing these two educational pathways presents a false dichotomy. It is crucial to acknowledge that both vocational training and university education serve distinct yet complementary purposes. Investing in both areas can yield a more holistic and robust workforce. A balanced approach would not only harness immediate skill sets but also foster long-term intellectual capital which could adapt to future changes in the job market.

In conclusion, a balanced allocation of funds towards both vocational training and university education is imperative. The former addresses immediate economic demands with practical skills, while the latter ensures long-term societal progress through intellectual development. This dual investment strategy is crucial for a nation's comprehensive growth.

Sample 3:

There is a claim that funding should be decreased for higher education and increased for the purpose of conducting workshops and trainings focused on obtaining jobs. This essay firmly concurs with this assertion since vocational training equips students with greater employability that enables them to land their desired employment without devoting years to obtaining a university degree.

To commence, vocational training facilities have given students hands-on opportunity to plan their professional paths. This practical sector has more overt goals of directing the students toward tangible job paths, in contrast to university education, which places a greater emphasis only on theoretical learning. Vocational programs provide internship opportunities as a component of the curriculum, which provide students with some relevant powerful skills that are crucial for their later entry into the labour market. Furthermore, because job-related training institutions are rapidly receiving accreditation from governments and concerned upper echelons, degrees from this education platform not only satisfy the standards for formal qualifications, but also serve as credentials for practical abilities.

Additionally, vocational training fields have higher cost-effective values in terms of both time and money. While employment-oriented trainings are far less expensive and more accessible, university education is so expensive that some students are unable to pay it and end up taking out loans. Moreover, students in vocational schools typically spend only two years for a degree, which is sufficient time for acquiring their necessary skills, and they find their suitable jobs immediately after the degree, whereas university degrees typically take four years to complete and even after that the graduates struggle to find their desired jobs, resulting in a continuous debt burden. It follows that those who receive vocational training don't need to pursue additional years of education or wait an extended period of time to secure employment.

In conclusion, people with vocational education join the workforce more quickly than university graduates do, with more precise skill sets and less expenditure. Therefore, the onus is on governments to allocate more funds for this efficient skill-based education sector.

Sample 4:

The allocation of a country's resources towards the betterment of its citizens' education has always been a topic of debate. Specifically, some argue that nations should channel more money on skills and vocational training geared towards practical work, as opposed to traditional university education. I vehemently agree with this stance, believing that the emphasis on vocational training offers more tangible benefits in the current global scenario.

One of the primary reasons for my perspective is the evident skills gap in many industries. While university degrees often provide a broad education, they sometimes lack the specialized training required for certain job roles. By investing more money in skills and vocational training, nations can directly address the needs of industries such as plumbing, carpentry, or even advanced roles in technology and healthcare. For instance, in countries like Germany, apprenticeship programs that focus on specific trades have led to lower youth unemployment rates, as young adults are equipped with the exact skills employers are seeking.

Moreover, the nature of work and employment is rapidly evolving with the advent of technology and automation. Practical skills that are honed through vocational training make individuals more adaptable and resilient in the face of such changes. A graduate with a degree in liberal arts might possess critical thinking and analytical skills but may find it challenging to secure a job without the necessary practical skills that many industries now demand. Conversely, an individual trained in, say, digital marketing or coding through a vocational course, would find it considerably easier to enter the job market and even command a higher starting salary.

In conclusion, while university education remains valuable, it's vital for nations to prioritize skills and vocational training in today's dynamic job market. This shift not only assures economic stability but also paves the way for a prosperous future for their citizens.

Sample 5:

The allocation of government funds to either skills and vocational training or university education is a subject of significant debate. While some argue that resources should be primarily directed towards skills and vocational training, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint. This essay will present arguments against this proposition, highlighting the crucial role of university education.

First and foremost, it is essential to recognize that university education is not merely about acquiring specialized knowledge but also about fostering critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. Universities provide a holistic learning environment that encourages students to explore various disciplines, enabling them to develop a wide range of skills beyond practical, job-specific training. For example, a student studying history may develop research, analytical, and communication skills that can be applied to various professions, not just history-related roles.

Furthermore, universities serve as hubs of research and innovation, contributing to advancements in various fields that benefit society as a whole. Many groundbreaking discoveries and technological innovations have originated from university research. For instance, universities have played a pivotal role in the development of life-saving medical treatments, environmentally sustainable technologies, and revolutionary scientific theories.

Finally, technical and specialized universities, often associated with university education, are instrumental in producing highly skilled professionals in various fields. These institutions offer comprehensive programs that nurture engineers, inventors, scientists, artists, and other experts who possess a depth of knowledge and expertise that surpasses what most ordinary vocational training institutes can provide.

In conclusion, while skills and vocational training are undeniably valuable for equipping individuals with practical skills, the assertion that the government should allocate more resources to this area at the expense of university education is flawed. Universities offer a broader spectrum of benefits, including fostering critical thinking and driving innovation, which are vital for societal progress. They also create leaders, inventors, engineers and so on who contribute to the development of the nation.

Sample 6:

While some people believe that the government should allocate more subsidies for vocational education than higher education, personally, I believe these two forms of education should be equally invested.

It is understandable why some people advocate for more funding towards trades training. Firstly, such programs are more cost-effective than university education. Unlike academic studies which normally requires at least 3,5 years to complete, students choosing vocational courses can graduate after 2 years. Secondly, vocational schools can alleviate the nation's labor shortage. Higher education tends to prioritize theoretical knowledge. Some majors even place a heavy emphasis on theories rather than practical skills, which would cost businesses time and money to retrain these graduates. Trades schools, on the other hand, equip students with more specific skills for the in-demand jobs. This helps vacancies to be quickly filled, allowing smooth operations.

Despite the benefits of vocational programs, higher education also has its own merits. Firstly, tertiary education provides high-quality workforce, contributing to a developed economy. Universities produce intellectual graduates from various fields such as science, medicine, technology, and engineering. These professions can foster innovation and encourage new technologies, playing a crucial role in the development of the economy. Furthermore, thanks to high workload and requirements from academic studies, students can be equipped with necessary transferable skills such as time management, problem-solving and presentation skills. Acquiring these skills, students would become more prepared for their future careers, making them more competitive in the labor market.

In conclusion, degree programs and technical training have their own merits, which benefit both learners and the nation's economy. Therefore, I hold a belief that the government should prioritize neither, instead, resources should be equally invested.

Sample 7:

Pragmatism is a dominant tendency in today’s world, exemplified by the emphasis on training for practical work over university education. Although I do not question the importance of vocational training, I object to the notion that it is superior to university education.

Equipping the workforce with relevant skills and knowledge is definitely important and beneficial. Apparently, not everyone is capable of learning in a research-oriented environment, which is typical of university education. In fact, it would be detrimental to assume that all individuals, no matter how competent, should be given an equal opportunity to attend university. This will certainly result in the decline in the quality of higher education, illustrated by the on-going deterioration at many institutions in the US, as depicted by Tom Nichols in ‘The Death of the Expertise’. Meanwhile, a skilled worker can create tangible values for society, which is worth encouraging.

However, this does not mean that the above-mentioned emphasis is appropriate. On the contrary, negligence towards higher education would cause incredible damage to a country’s sustainability and growth. For instance, without continual research into and teaching of the basic sciences, which have recently been under attack and accused of being impractical, no foundation could be laid for further scientific and technological applications. Similarly, studies of history, literature, and philosophy are usually condemned as abstruse and therefore unnecessary, yet without them, human beings would suffer immeasurable mental poverty and are no different from mindless labor-machines.

In conclusion, as I have mentioned, just as researchers play an indispensable role in society, skilled workers are equally essential and respectable. Nevertheless, recognizing the significance of vocational training is completely different from underestimating higher education.

Sample 8:

In response to the prompt, I strongly agree that nations should allocate more funds towards skills and vocational training for practical work. While university education is essential, it is not the only means of acquiring knowledge and skills.

Firstly, practical skills are in high demand in the workforce. Vocational training can equip individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Secondly, vocational training is more cost-effective than university education. University education is expensive, and not everyone can afford it. In contrast, vocational training is more affordable and accessible to a broader range of people. This accessibility can help reduce the skills gap in the workforce and promote social mobility.

In conclusion, nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work. By investing in vocational training, nations can equip their workforce with practical skills, promote social mobility, and foster innovation.

Sample 1:

In an era where global trade has shrunk distances, the ability to consume food from every corner of the globe is a reality for many. This phenomenon, while showcasing the marvels of modern logistics, presents a dichotomy of benefits and drawbacks. The essence of this discussion revolves around the cultural enrichment and economic benefits against the environmental impact and potential harm to local agriculture.

Foremost among the advantages is the cultural exchange that global food trade facilitates. Diverse cuisines introduced to new regions foster a greater understanding and appreciation of different cultures. For example, someone in London can enjoy authentic Thai curry for dinner, thereby enhancing cultural awareness and culinary diversity. Additionally, this exposure encourages culinary innovation and fusion, leading to new gastronomic experiences. Economically, importing food has the potential to stabilize food prices during off-seasons, ensuring a steady supply of fresh produce year-round. This not only benefits consumers by offering variety outside local harvest seasons but also supports global trade networks, creating jobs and promoting economic growth in exporting countries. Such economic interdependence can also foster stronger diplomatic relations between trading nations.

Conversely, the disadvantages of the global food trade are significant and multifaceted. The carbon footprint associated with transporting food across vast distances is a major environmental concern. Airfreight, in particular, emits a substantial amount of greenhouse gases compared to locally sourced produce, contributing significantly to global warming. This environmental cost also includes the depletion of natural resources and increased pollution from transportation. Furthermore, the global food trade can undermine local farmers, who may struggle to compete with the influx of imported goods. This competition can lead to a decline in local agriculture, reducing biodiversity as monoculture farming practices become more prevalent to meet export demands. Such a shift not only affects the environment but also risks erasing local food traditions and knowledge, diminishing cultural heritage.

In conclusion, the global food trade, though enriching culturally and economically, carries environmental and social costs. Balancing the benefits with the drawbacks requires sustainable trade and support for local agriculture to ensure a positive impact on both the planet and its people.

Sample 2:

The modern world enjoys an unprecedented luxury: access to global cuisines, a testament to the interconnectedness of our societies. This essay posits that the advantages of this global food network significantly outweigh its disadvantages, focusing on the enrichment of cultural knowledge and economic benefits, contrasted against environmental concerns and impacts on local agriculture.

The importation of global foods serves as a bridge between cultures, expanding our culinary horizons and fostering a deeper understanding of diverse societies. For instance, the availability of Vietnamese Pho in Canada not only introduces Canadians to Vietnamese culture but also encourages culinary diversity and innovation. This cultural exchange enriches societies, breaking down barriers and promoting global unity. Economically, the global food trade is a cornerstone of the world economy, offering countries the opportunity to specialize in certain crops or products, thereby maximizing efficiency and economic output. This specialization leads to a more diversified global market, where countries benefit from trade relations that bolster their economies and provide consumers with a variety of foods at competitive prices.

However, this global trade does not come without its environmental toll. The transportation of food across continents significantly contributes to carbon emissions, raising serious concerns about sustainability and the urgent need for greener logistics. Moreover, the influx of imported goods can challenge local farmers, potentially leading to a homogenization of global agriculture at the expense of local traditions and biodiversity. This shift risks not only the loss of unique culinary heritages but also the vital ecological balance maintained by diverse agricultural practices.

In conclusion, despite environmental and agricultural challenges, the cultural and economic gains from global food trade are significant. These benefits enhance global understanding and economic growth. The key is adopting sustainable methods to reduce negatives, ensuring this trade remains a positive force for cultural and economic exchange.

Sample 3:

The frequent importation of food items from foreign nations has become a standard practice for several countries worldwide. While some contend that this trend might encourage the development of an unhealthy monopoly, I firmly believe that the freedom to choose efficiently from the global food market confers an enormous advantage that clearly outweighs its drawbacks.

When it comes to the global food market, richer nations typically emerge as victors. This can potentially threaten poorer nations by undercutting their domestic buyers, as consumers now have access to a borderless food market teeming with offerings from more affluent countries. As a consequence, poorer nations may find themselves unable to market their food items competitively in the international arena, while richer nations with a comparative advantage can modify their products and offer them at lower prices, thus ultimately dominating the global food market. This dynamic pushes the sellers of poorer countries away from the global food market and undermines their ability to participate in the global economy.

Conversely, there exists a strong belief that the global food supply chain plays a significant role in enhancing people's standard of living. By virtue of the frequency and convenience of import and export, people can access a wider array of food options, ranging from fruits to various types of meat. This, in turn, can positively impact local communities' dietary habits, leading to a more well-rounded and balanced diet than previously available. Moreover, consuming nutrient-rich foods from other countries can lead to a healthier life overall. Furthermore, as stipulated in international trade theory, specializing in products with absolute or comparative advantages and selling them to other countries can significantly increase export earnings and efficiency, ultimately leading to significant economic growth.

Therefore, despite the potential for financial risks associated with transporting food across borders, the benefits of such practices are profound, as they improve people's standard of living and foster economic growth on a local level. As such, it is essential to continue to facilitate international trade practices that enable individuals to benefit from the global food market while simultaneously empowering poorer nations to participate in the global economy on a more equitable footing.

Sample 4:

In an era where globalization has flourished, the availability of diverse food options from across the globe in many countries has sparked considerable debate. This phenomenon, especially prevalent in Vietnam, poses a complex question: do the advantages of this culinary diversity surpass its potential disadvantages?

One notable benefit of having access to a wide array of international foods is the enhancement of cultural understanding and appreciation. For instance, Vietnamese citizens can explore the richness of Italian cuisine or the intricacies of Japanese gastronomy without leaving their country. This exposure not only broadens culinary horizons but also fosters a deeper global awareness and tolerance. Additionally, this variety caters to the dietary needs and preferences of a multicultural population, promoting inclusivity. However, it's essential to acknowledge the environmental footprint of transporting food globally. The long-distance transportation of food often involves significant carbon emissions, contributing to environmental degradation. Yet, this concern can be mitigated by prioritizing sustainable transportation and sourcing methods.

However, I believe that the benefits of having such culinary diversity are substantial. In Vietnam, the introduction of global cuisines has sparked innovation in the food industry. Local chefs are inspired to fuse traditional Vietnamese flavors with international ones, leading to a renaissance in the culinary landscape. This not only enriches the national cuisine but also boosts the local economy by attracting tourists and creating jobs. While there are concerns about the potential loss of traditional food practices, the reality is that the exposure to global cuisines often leads to a renewed interest and pride in local culinary traditions among the younger generation.

In conclusion, while the drawbacks of global food transportation, notably its environmental impact, are not to be overlooked, the benefits of cultural exchange, economic growth, and culinary innovation in Vietnam significantly tip the scales in favor of this global culinary diversity. It's a vivid example of how globalization, when managed thoughtfully, can enrich a nation's cultural and economic fabric.

Sample 5:

Access to a variety of food from all over the world is a common feature of modern life in many countries. While this may be seen as a positive development, there are both advantages and disadvantages to this phenomenon.

One of the advantages of having a wide variety of food available is that it can increase consumer choice and promote cultural exchange. People can try new foods and experience different cuisines from around the world, which can expand their palates and cultural horizons. This can lead to a greater appreciation for diverse cultures and a more global perspective.

However, there are also disadvantages to the transportation of food from all over the world. One of the main concerns is the environmental impact of transporting food over long distances. This requires significant amounts of energy and results in greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change. Additionally, the transportation of food can be costly, which can lead to higher prices for consumers.

Another disadvantage is that the transportation of food can lead to a loss of freshness and quality. Food that is transported over long distances may be picked before it is fully ripe, which can affect its taste and nutritional value. It may also be exposed to various chemicals and preservatives to help it stay fresh during transport.

In conclusion, while access to a wide variety of food from all over the world may have some advantages, such as increased consumer choice and cultural exchange, the disadvantages, such as environmental impact and loss of freshness and quality, cannot be ignored. Therefore, it is important to strike a balance between offering a variety of food and minimizing the negative impacts of food transportation. This can be achieved through efforts to promote local and seasonal food, reduce packaging waste, and invest in more sustainable modes of transportation.

Sample 6:

Nowadays, supermarkets are stocked with food products from around the world. Some individuals are of the opinion that this imported food has a detrimental effect on our economy and culture, and it would be better if people ate only the local produce. Certainly, the disadvantages of imported food outweigh the advantages.

Admittedly, transporting food over a long distance gives us a lot of choices. We can taste a variety of fruits and vegetables from all parts of the world. For example, about ten years ago, we hardly saw kiwi fruit, which is from New Zealand. But now it has a place on every fruit stand. Secondly, many people get employment in this field. Small farmers have a chance to expand globally, and it increases the overall economy of the country. Finally, it helps in developing good relations between countries, which helps in international cooperation and peace.

However, importing food can have a negative effect on local culture. This can be seen in countries such as India where imported food has become more popular than traditional, local produce, eroding people's understanding of their own food traditions. Although some would claim that this is a natural part of economic development, in an increasingly global world, I feel strongly that any loss of regional culture would be detrimental.

A second major reason to reduce imports is the environmental cost. Currently, many food imports such as fruit, are transported thousands of miles by road, sea and air, making the produce more expensive to buy and increasing pollution from exhaust fumes. Despite the fact that trade in food exports has existed for many years, I am convinced that a reduction would bring significant financial and environmental gains.

In conclusion, I am certain that if people ate locally produced food, it would have environmental benefits. It would also benefit the local economy because, in time, people would prosper commercially as the demand for local and regional produce would remain high resisting the competition from overseas.

Sample 7:

A broader variety of food goods can be distributed around the globe thanks to modern transportation technologies. I would contend that, despite what some people claim, importing food has more negative consequences on society than positive ones.

Indeed, importing food items might have some advantageous effects. To start, a large number of individuals may enjoy a wide variety of foods thanks to growing international trade. The ecology differs in every nation. As a result, many kinds of fruits and vegetables can be grown on each soil. For instance, without international trade, individuals in Korea cannot obtain tropical fruits. As a result, many people may share traditional cuisine while experiencing new foods without having to travel. Another advantage is that the government can establish trusting ties between nations through trade. As a result, many people may share traditional cuisine while experiencing new foods without having to travel. The government may establish trusting relationships between nations through trade, which is an additional benefit. This is due to the fact that they can exchange necessary food items. As a result, they can engage with one another in a variety of positive ways.

I still think that the disadvantages can exceed these advantages, though. Environmental problems may result from increased trade-related transportation. These modes of transportation, which use a variety of fossil fuels, can emit a variety of emissions. As a result, the exhaust gas has the potential to pollute the environment. Being a small-scale farmer in a nation that imports goods, they struggle to make a living through marketing. This is due to the fact that food imports are frequently economical. As a result, many consumers are more likely to purchase imported goods than native goods. In this regard, the local producers can experience financial challenges.

As stated above, in my opinion, limitations outweigh the benefits as overall it is going to challenge our nation and its economy to a greater extent.

In conclusion, I am aware of the advantages of importing food, such as getting to try new foods and fostering international contacts. Yet, I still think that this should be viewed as a bad development for the reasons indicated above, such as the contaminated environment and the financial struggles of local farmers.

Sample 1:

Many contend that securing financial stability is essential for individuals of all ages. I am generally in agreement with this contention though I would concede that saving money can be taken to illogical excesses.

Undue emphasis on saving prioritizes satisfaction in the future over enjoyment of the present moment. In most countries, individuals begin to save and plan for retirement as young adults. This approach means that by the time they have enough time to enjoy themselves, they are likely older, unhealthy, and less capable of living an active life. A person who saves for a comfortable retirement by abstaining from travel, going out with friends regularly, and spending money on luxuries might discover later in life that a sizeable savings account is no substitute for a full life. However, this assumes an extreme approach to saving that is rare for the vast majority of people who can typically balance basic fiscal responsibility with freer spending habits.

Moreover, saving money allows individuals of all ages to safeguard the flexibility to pursue a variety of passions in life. Those who have not inherited generational wealth and do not commit themselves to saving, will almost undoubtedly have to work long hours for many years. Yet, if a worker slowly accumulates savings, then that allows them to make investments and generate passive income streams. These alternative ways of earning money can give them options in life. They might decide to quit or work fewer hours and pursue a passion project. They might also be more inclined to be entrepreneurial or adventurous in their choice of vocation. All these options lead to a richer and more varied life that contrasts markedly with working diligently towards retirement.

In conclusion, despite the possible risks of fixating on savings to the detriment of quality of life, there is value in saving wisely for all individuals. These savings will likely vary in size depending on the needs and circumstances of each person.

Sample 2:

Many feel that saving money for future plans plays an instrumental role in one’s life. In my opinion, despite the importance of spending money on meaningful experiences, regular saving should be prioritized to ensure long-term financial security.

Detractors of a fixation on saving typically emphasize the significance of enjoying the present moment. Money is a tool that can be allocated towards funding valuable experiences with friends and family members, engendering a sense of belonging and greater overall levels of satisfaction. Most individuals do not regret spending money on family vacations years later and even cite these moments as the highlights of life. The times spent on relaxing holidays also engender legitimate benefits to one’s mental well-being. There is overwhelming evidence showing that those who place excessive emphasis on saving instead of spending on leisure activities generally suffer from some degree of poor mental health.

However, advocates of saving money argue that this act lays the foundation for long-term financial stability. Ease of access to an emergency fund is likely to at least ensure the payment of unexpected expenses without the need for a loan. The positive implications of emergency savings are best illustrated in cases where money is needed to cover hospital fees and living costs during periods of unemployment. These benefits become even more evident for those who manage to save a significant amount of capital as they can more easily achieve more ambitious financial goals. For example, savings accounts can be utilized as down payment for mortgage loans, allowing for the possibility of car and home ownership.

In conclusion, although spending money on real experiences with loved ones is highly rewarding, I would argue the act of saving deserves prioritization because it promotes lasting financial well-being. Individuals, especially younger ones, should, when feasible, allocate a portion of their monthly income towards long-term savings to be strategically prepared for the future.

Sample 3:

In today’s society, the importance of saving money is often emphasized as a critical habit for securing a stable future. This notion is particularly relevant for young people, who are at the beginning of their financial journey. While some may argue that the youth should prioritize living in the present rather than concerning themselves with future financial security, I firmly believe that saving money is indispensable for everyone, including the younger generation.

On one hand, opponents of the idea that young people should save money argue that youth is a time for exploration and enjoyment, not for financial constraints. They believe that young individuals should focus on gaining experiences, traveling, and building social connections rather than worrying about their future finances. For example, some argue that spending money on activities such as traveling or pursuing hobbies enriches life and contributes to personal growth in ways that saving money cannot. Additionally, they point out that young people have their entire lives ahead of them to earn money, so there is no immediate need to start saving.

However, I contend that developing a habit of saving money from a young age is crucial because it fosters financial security. Life is unpredictable, and having a financial cushion can provide security during unexpected events, such as job loss or health emergencies. For instance, young adults with savings are better equipped to handle sudden medical expenses or periods of unemployment, thereby reducing stress and anxiety. Additionally, saving money early allows young people to capitalize on investment opportunities, such as higher education or starting a business, which can lead to greater financial stability in the future. These investments not only contribute to personal development but also pave the way for a more secure and prosperous life.

In my view, while it is important to embrace life and embrace new experiences, the benefits of saving money cannot be overlooked. Cultivating the habit of saving from a young age instills a sense of responsibility and financial discipline that will serve individuals well throughout their lives. It is not about sacrificing present enjoyment for future security, but rather about striking a balance that ensures both financial stability and personal fulfillment.

In conclusion, although there may be arguments against the need for young people to save money, the long-term advantages far outweigh the short-term enjoyment. By saving money, young people can ensure their financial stability, take advantage of future opportunities, and ultimately lead more secure and fulfilling lives.

Sample 4:

Effective personal finance management has garnered significant public attention for decades, with many emphasizing the paramount importance of saving for the future, particularly for young people. While there are valid reasons for justified spending, I firmly agree with the emphasis on saving.

Critics of prioritizing personal finance management often argue in favor of individual rights and personal preferences. They assert that people across all age demographics are entitled to personal freedom and that spending habits fall within this fundamental tenet. Advising or enforcing mandates against one’s spending inclinations may be seen as an infringement on individual freedom. Additionally, money is a prerequisite for varying levels of life enjoyment and happiness. This is especially true for young people, as they are not yet burdened with responsibilities such as marriage, family life, or raising children. Therefore, spending on educational and recreational pursuits, such as traveling to distant places, studying abroad, enrolling in a master’s program, or even engaging in risky investments, can be considered justifiable.

However, I argue that everyone, irrespective of age, should commit to saving to build future wealth. Firstly, unexpected life crises, such as deteriorating health due to illness, can lead to an inability to earn an income. A notable example is chronically ill patients in countries without healthcare coverage, who may spend years repaying medical debts. In such cases, if individuals had set aside an emergency fund or purchased healthcare insurance earlier in life, they might not find themselves in such precarious situations. Moreover, invaluable investment opportunities often arise from saved earnings. Individuals who have prioritized personal finance management from a young age are better positioned to take advantage of compound interest in various markets, such as the stock market, real estate, and cryptocurrency. Cultivating a money-savvy attitude early in life helps individuals amass stable wealth and achieve financial freedom.

In conclusion, while personal freedom and individual inclinations may justify spending for young people, I contend that a savings-oriented mindset is necessary to cover crises and capitalize on investment opportunities. It is important for individuals to balance conflicting interests and determine the best course of action for their financial well-being.

Sample 5:

Saving money is crucial for everyone, including young people, as it ensures financial stability and independence. I strongly agree with the notion that young individuals should prioritize saving for their future.

Firstly, saving money provides a safety net for unexpected expenses, such as medical emergencies, car repairs, or job loss. This financial security is essential for reducing stress and ensuring that one can handle life's uncertainties. Consider the story of my friend Sarah, a single mother who works as a waitress. Her diligent saving for emergencies allowed her to cover a major car repair last year without going into debt, illustrating how building a financial safety net enables individuals to manage unexpected expenses and maintain their well-being without major disruptions.

Secondly, having savings allows individuals to be less dependent on others, whether it's family, friends, or financial institutions. This independence can lead to greater personal freedom and the ability to make choices that align with one's values and goals. Financial independence is crucial as it empowers people to make decisions based on their own aspirations rather than being influenced by external pressures or obligations. For instance, someone with adequate savings can choose a career path that truly interests them, even if it offers a lower salary initially, because they are not constrained by the immediate need for a higher income.

In conclusion, saving money is essential for young people as it provides financial security and independence, enabling them to handle unexpected expenses and make choices that align with their personal goals and values.

Sample 6:

The importance of saving money for the future is a principle that has been widely advocated, encompassing individuals across all age groups, including young people. I fully agree with the statement that it is essential for everyone to save money for their future. This essay will explore the reasons for this stance and provide relevant examples to support the argument.

Firstly, saving money from a young age cultivates financial discipline and responsibility. When young people learn to manage their finances early, they develop habits that can lead to long-term financial stability. By understanding the value of money and the importance of budgeting, they are better prepared to handle financial challenges in adulthood. For instance, young adults who save regularly are more likely to avoid debt and are better positioned to invest in opportunities such as higher education, homeownership, or starting a business.

Secondly, saving money provides a safety net for unforeseen circumstances. Life is unpredictable, and emergencies such as medical issues, job loss, or unexpected expenses can arise at any time. Having savings can alleviate the stress associated with these situations and provide financial security. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many individuals who had savings were able to cope better with the economic uncertainties compared to those without any financial buffer.

Moreover, early savings can lead to greater financial growth over time due to the power of compound interest. The earlier one starts saving, the more time their money has to grow. Investing even small amounts regularly can accumulate substantial wealth over decades.

Additionally, saving money can help young people achieve their life goals and aspirations. Whether it’s traveling, pursuing further education, or starting a family, having financial resources set aside makes it easier to accomplish these dreams. For instance, students who save part of their allowance or earnings can fund their studies abroad or take a gap year to explore different cultures without incurring debt.

In conclusion, saving money is a vital practice for everyone, including young people. It fosters financial discipline, provides a safety net, benefits from compound interest, and helps achieve life goals. While it is essential to save, it is equally important to find a balance that allows young people to enjoy their present while preparing for a secure future.

Sample 7:

The practice of setting aside money for the future is often regarded as essential for everyone, including juveniles. I fully support this viewpoint due to the security it provides and the opportunities it generates.

I believe that accumulating savings is vital because it ensures financial security. Savings can help individuals manage unexpected expenses or emergencies without falling into debt. For example, during my university years, I made it a point to save a portion of my part-time job earnings. This habit proved invaluable when I faced an unforeseen vehicle expense. Instead of resorting to high-interest loans or credit cards, I was able to cover the cost using my savings, thereby avoiding financial stress and ensuring my studies were not disrupted.

Moreover, setting aside money is crucial as it creates future opportunities. Having a financial cushion allows individuals to make significant life decisions, such as pursuing higher education, starting a business, or buying a home, without being constrained by immediate financial limitations. For instance, a close friend of mine saved money throughout his teenage years from mowing lawns. When he graduated from high school, he had sufficient money to launch his own lawn-mowing business, which has since become highly successful. This illustrates how prudent saving can lead to substantial personal and professional growth.

In conclusion, I completely believe in the importance of saving money for the future, especially for juveniles. The financial security and opportunities that savings provide are invaluable. Therefore, cultivating the habit of saving early in life is essential for ensuring a stable and prosperous future.

Sample 1:

There is a common problem among high school graduates these days where students are leaving school without any knowledge or skill in personal money management. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.

Firstly, one of the main causes of this problem is that the majority of high school students live with their parents and are completely financially dependent upon them. Most students do not need to work to earn money while at high school, as their parents pay for all their needs, and therefore do not gain any understanding about the realities of earning and saving money. Usually, the only money that students receive is from their parents and this is typically in the form of pocket money, which is given with the intent of it being spent. Therefore, young people only really learn how to spend money, and not how to earn, save or manage it wisely.

However, there are a number of viable solutions to help students deal with this problem. Firstly, basic money management skills could be included as a compulsory subject for students in their high school years, which would help equip them with the knowledge and skills to manage their own personal finances when they leave school, move out of home and enter employment. The second possible step that could be taken to help curb this problem is through education at home. Parents need to take responsibility to make sure that their children are adequately educated in such matters to ensure their children maintain a successful and independent financial situation after graduating and leaving home.

In conclusion, although money management is a problem for a lot of school leavers, there are a number of viable solutions to counteract this problem.

Sample 2:

The financial awareness of high school students has become a cause of concern in recent years, as a significant portion of them graduate without sufficient money management skills. While there are various explanations for this situation, it can be resolved thanks to several solutions.

Such a deficiency among high school students can be traced back to factors from both the school and the household. Notably, one of the reasons is the dearth of financial education in the school curriculum. Many schools, in fact, continue to emphasize traditional subjects such as mathematics, science, and humanities, while knowledge about budgeting, savings, and debt management is considered unimportant. Parents, meanwhile, may aggravate the problem by neglecting to teach their children about money. This likely stems from a lack of financial literacy of those parents themselves, or a reluctance to discuss the topic with their children. Whatever the cause, this absence of both formal and informal guidance leaves students in the dark about matters regarding money.

Nevertheless, there are potential solutions to remedy this situation. Firstly, educators should look to incorporate financial lessons into the curriculum. One possible course of action is to create classes where students learn the value of money, how taxes work, and how to budget properly. At the same time, educators can make lessons relevant with real-life examples to keep learners interested. Outside of school, parents ought to involve their children in family financial decisions, starting with simpler ones. Minor chores, such as grocery shopping, or planning a family outing within a set budget can offer valuable lessons on money management. Financial knowledge, as a result, would be instilled in children by the time they come of age. A comprehensive educational approach which utilizes both solutions is likely to improve students’ savviness with money once they graduate from high school.

In conclusion, high school students may enter adulthood without sufficient money management skills due to the shortcomings of both their school and their parents, but potent remedies for the situation do exist. Young learners will be better prepared to navigate their future if they are well-equipped with financial knowledge.

Sample 3:

It is true that pupils graduate from high school without being equipped with sufficient knowledge and skills regarding personal finance management. This essay will elaborate on the reasons behind this deficiency and propose potential solutions to address it.

There are several reasons why financial literacy is not included as a part of the curriculum, chief of which is the focus on core academic subjects. This can be attributed to the fact that schools often prepared students for standardized tests and exams, leading to heavy emphasis on subjects like maths, literature, and physics. This focus leaves little or no room for essential life skill lessons like personal finance management. The solution is for educational leaders to lighten the academic workload for students and introduce financial literacy as a subject in schools, which would help students be better aware of managing money in the future.

Another compelling reason for the absence of personal finance management is the shortage of adequately trained high school teachers to deliver the lessons effectively. That is to say, teaching financial concepts requires specialized knowledge and experience, which most teachers, trained primarily in traditional core subjects, do not possess. To illustrate, a math teacher can explain complicated equations and arithmetic but is likely to struggle to break down credit score, taxation, or debt. The implication of this is that teachers who are not sufficiently equipped with fundamentals of the field lack confidence to teach financial literacy as a subject. To tackle this, schools can cooperate with higher educational institutions to provide proper financial literacy training for teachers. This would allow them to develop a thorough understanding of the subject and hence the capability to conduct the lessons.

In conclusion, there are several reasons why high school graduates do not have sufficient knowledge and skills regarding personal finance management. My belief is that the responsibility for solving this problem mainly lies with school leaders.

Sample 4:

It is alarming that many students graduate from high school without a basic understanding of how to manage their finances. This essay will explore the reasons behind this issue and propose a solution to ensure that today’s youth is equipped with the necessary financial skills for the future.

One significant cause contributing to the lack of financial literacy among students is the absence of relevant subjects in the school curriculum. Educational institutions tend to prioritize traditional subjects like mathematics, science, and languages, often leaving minimal room for practical life skills such as financial management. This emphasis on conventional academic areas neglects the critical need for students to acquire essential financial knowledge during their formative years. Additionally, another factor exacerbating the issue is the lack of financial literacy among parents, who play a crucial role as the primary educators of students. When parents themselves lack understanding in this area, they are unable to effectively impart financial knowledge to their children, perpetuating a cycle of ignorance.

A comprehensive solution to address the lack of financial literacy involves incorporating financial education into the school curriculum. This can be achieved through the introduction of independent subjects like personal finance or by integrating financial concepts into existing subjects such as mathematics. By providing students with practical applications of financial principles, the educational system can equip them with essential life skills. Additionally, addressing the parental aspect of this issue requires promoting financial education for parents. Community-based workshops, online courses, or informational campaigns can serve as effective tools to equip parents with the necessary knowledge and skills, enabling them to guide their children toward sound financial management practices. Implementing these measures collectively can contribute to building a financially literate and empowered generation.

In conclusion, the deficiency in financial education among high school students originates from the gap between the school curriculum and parental guidance. Nevertheless, through collaborative efforts between schools and the government, parents can be empowered to equip the youth with the essential financial skills needed for the future.

Sample 5:

High school students are studying up on literature, chemistry and world history; however, most aren’t learning fundamental money lessons to help them financially navigate the real world. Parents’ lack of financial knowledge and negligence of the education bureaucracy towards the matter are the biggest culprits; thus, several measures need to be taken to tackle those heightened concerns.

On the one hand, regardless of the fact that an overwhelming majority of teens desire more financial education, neither parents nor educational institutions are paying proper attention to financial literacy. It is said that a number of high schools are doing the bare minimum to equip students with the required skills for money management. In other words, state governments are focused on teaching the core subjects of Maths and English that personal finance often gets overlooked. In addition, parents today are not confident in their abilities to teach their kids about money management. Sadly enough, many parents haven’t learned critical financial values themselves; hence, they may be passing bad financial habits to their kids.

In essence, most teenagers lack personal money management skills as no one around them talks about it. Therefore, it is vital for parents to use financial hardships and strained budgets as an opportunity to talk about finances and teach kids about managing money around the dinner table. Teenage kids should also be included in budget planning through a weekly or monthly allowance. Another feasible approach is the embedding of financial literacy course into the school curriculum. Amongst traditional core subjects, students should be required to complete personal-finance classes to graduate.

In conclusion, lack of financial knowledge could leave serious implications on a kid’s livelihood. This is calling for collective actions of parents and schools to bring money-related education into everyday conversations as well as the official curriculum.

Sample 6:

Money management is the most common issue among people, especially among high school students. Generally, high school students lack the knowledge of personal money management skills due to several reasons that favor such a lack. Some of these manifold reasons include lack of learning from educational institutions about money management, parents’ general notion that their children are immature, and the outcome of their attitude.

The wrong way of handling money comes from the fact that the students are not acknowledged with the right skill of handling money. The school authority engaged the high school curriculum with major subjects of mathematics, science, commerce, and accountancy but left out these basic rules of money handling. This ignorance is reflected in the fact that these students often spent money recklessly without thinking wisely. Money that can be spent in a more useful manner gets spent unproductively. Secondly, the majority of parents have this misconception that their high school children are immature enough to handle the money at such a tender age. Even all the expenditures made by the children are made by the parents from their accounts. Such limitations make the students less knowledgeable about how they must handle their money with care and spend it wisely. Another reason that supports this claim is teenagers are at a very tender age. Students are more influenced by the materialistic way of living than the lessons taught in school. This made them spend money recklessly on more unproductive materialistic things than the productive area. These reasons bring us clearly to the fact that they cumulatively make the high school students weak enough in terms of money management.

Besides these reasons, a positive way forward can be taken in this direction by the high school authority to arrange lessons for the students where they can be practically taught to handle their money diligently. They must be taught about money management and how effective the process can be and also, the art of saving money. Students must learn how the money can be utilized in productive investment rather than an ineffective way of spending. This skill will help the students in their future endeavors and life.

Sample 7:

Money handling is a crucial issue and if not handled diligently, it can even lead to bankruptcy. The money management skill must be taught at the basic level, initially in high schools so that it becomes quite easier for them to handle money in the future. But it is found that the majority of the students lack the skills of money handling and their decisions regarding spending money are invalid. This brings us to some of the reasons that contribute to the mishandling of the money by the students. These reasons have been discussed in detail below.

One of the major reasons why high school students lack the skills of money management even after completing their high school is that the students are not taught the art of money handling in their high school. Usually, the school curriculum is so loaded with heavy learning that they are barely left with any free periods to conduct their lessons for money management. The second reason that leads to such failure is that their parents feel that the high school students are not mature enough to handle money. They most often receive the bare minimum amount of pocket money for their monthly expenses. Most of the major expenses of the children from fess to clothes are done by their parents paid through their payment mediums. High school students are hardly given money to pay their school or tuition fees or buy clothes for themselves or any other major expenses. Besides, at such a tender age, these students are more attracted towards the materialistic way of living and spend recklessly on such things which are of no future importance. And the major reason behind this is they are ignorant about the principles of money management.

However, this problem of poor money management can be solved if the required steps are taken at the initial levels, i.e., the high school level. If the students are taught the art of spending money diligently, the importance of the right investment, and how money spending can turn out to be productive, then these money handling skills will become a breakthrough for them in their future life because they are accustomed to the principles of money.

Sample 8:

Most often parents complain that their children spend money recklessly and don’t handle the money properly. These students mostly belong to the high school grade or above. But the major problem lies at the core. Such students lack money handling skills because they are not taught about how to manage money at the basic level and this ignorance is reflected in their poor handling of money. Now considering the reasons that favor such mishandling are discussed below.

Usually in school, students are taught about the core subjects of science, mathematics, and commerce. They are taught about how money revolves in the economy but are not taught how effectively money can be evolved. The students are not taught any lesson on money management and such students in the future cannot make more money in the future and get indulged in a vicious cycle of poor money handling. This is one of the reasons why only 1% of the world population are counted as billionaires. Apart from school, a home is considered as students’ first school and most of the parents feel that their children are not mature enough to own money by themselves. This contributes to their money mismanagement actions where they spend money recklessly.

However, such actions can be stopped by taking correct measures at the initial stage rather. School curriculum must include money management as the mandatory subject apart from the core subjects of mathematics, science, English, etc. Secondly, students must be taught the art of saving money and the benefits of it in the future. Thirdly, parents must start giving their children money to handle, such starting should be made from a small amount of money and gradually the amount must be increased. Apart from this, students must learn the habit of keeping a track record of all the expenditures they are making, so at the end of the month, they are aware of the fact that how much money they have spent in a month and on what things. Students must learn the importance of productive investment and they must explore the ways of making productive investment rather than reckless spending.

In conclusion, money handling is a crucial subject, and students must be made aware of such subjects at the initial level itself.

Sample 9:

In today's educational landscape, a concerning trend has emerged: students frequently exit high school without mastering the essential skill of money management. This predicament is rooted in a combination of systemic educational shortcomings and societal neglect. This essay aims to dissect the underlying causes of this issue and propose viable solutions, focusing on the integration of financial literacy into the curriculum and fostering a culture of financial awareness from an early age.

The core reasons behind this troubling trend can be attributed to the educational system's prioritization and societal attitudes towards financial education. Predominantly, the curriculum in many high schools is heavily skewed towards traditional academic subjects, with scant emphasis on practical life skills such as financial management. This oversight leaves students ill-prepared for the financial realities of adulthood. Additionally, there is a pervasive societal belief that financial education is a responsibility that rests solely with the family, a notion that disregards the varying levels of financial acumen among households. Consequently, students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money, a deficiency that can lead to long-term financial instability.

To address these issues, a multifaceted approach is necessary. Primarily, the integration of financial literacy into the high school curriculum stands as a crucial step. This entails not only the teaching of basic budgeting and saving techniques but also more complex financial concepts such as investing and debt management. Such an inclusive approach ensures that students are equipped with a comprehensive understanding of financial management before they transition into adulthood. Furthermore, fostering a culture of financial awareness from a young age is paramount. This can be achieved through initiatives like financial literacy workshops and interactive financial education platforms, which can demystify financial concepts and make the subject more accessible and engaging for young learners.

In conclusion, the issue of students leaving high school without the knowledge of how to manage their finances is a multifaceted problem that requires a comprehensive solution. By revising the educational curriculum to include financial literacy and cultivating a societal culture that values and promotes financial awareness, we can empower future generations with the skills necessary to navigate the complexities of financial management.

Sample 10:

In an era where financial literacy is paramount, it is disconcerting that many students leave high school without mastering the essential skill of money management. This troubling phenomenon stems from both educational gaps and societal norms, necessitating a multifaceted approach to rectify. This essay will explore the underlying causes of this issue and propose viable solutions to ensure future generations are well-equipped to handle their finances.

The roots of this problem lie primarily in the educational system's curriculum, which often lacks a comprehensive focus on personal finance. Schools tend to prioritize traditional academic subjects over practical life skills, leaving a significant gap in students' knowledge about budgeting, saving, and investing. Additionally, there is a societal tendency to shield young people from financial responsibilities, inadvertently stunting their fiscal growth and understanding. As a result, students graduate without the acumen to navigate the complexities of financial planning and decision-making.

To address these shortcomings, a two-pronged approach is essential. Firstly, integrating personal finance education into the high school curriculum is imperative. This would not only cover basic concepts like budgeting and saving but also delve into more complex topics such as taxes, investments, and loans, providing a comprehensive framework for students. Incorporating case studies and real-life scenarios can enhance understanding and retention. Secondly, parents and guardians must play a proactive role by involving children in household financial planning from an early age. Encouraging discussions about money, allowing them to manage a small budget, or even involving them in investment decisions can demystify financial matters and build confidence.

In conclusion, the issue of students leaving high school without the requisite knowledge to manage their finances is multifaceted, rooted in educational and societal practices. By revising educational curriculums to include personal finance and encouraging parental involvement in financial education, we can equip future generations with the skills necessary to navigate their financial journeys successfully.

Sample 11:

Most secondary school graduates lack any useful self-financing expertise. I firmly believe that this is primarily due to their financial dependence on their parents and lack of tax payment experience. However, including financial management basics in core classes can help high school graduates who have just graduated.

The majority of high school pupils lack practical expertise with self-financing. Since most students do not have to pay their tuition or living expenses on their own, it is possible that they are unaware of their financial situation. To be more precise, they squander the pocket money their parents provide them, heedless of the potential repercussions. Only 5% of all students nationally, according to a poll by the education minister of the Japanese government, are having trouble paying their tuition or have debts from attending high schools. Thus, due to their financial comfort, they are oblivious to problems with money management.

Since school-goers do not have any obligations to pay income taxes or fund for a social welfare system, they have limited opportunities to think about their future financial responsibilities. The solution to this problem is pretty straightforward. School or educational institutions can give students some guidelines regarding their tax responsibilities or rational budgetary methods before the students enter the job market or strain their higher educational cost. Besides, the government can join those activities by handing out a leaflet regarding their future tax obligations directly to the students.

All in all, even if students have little opportunities to finance themselves and pay taxes, educational institutions and governments may play important roles by providing them with financial education and factual information to help them become more financially conscious.

Sample 12:

Currently, students are leaving school without even the most fundamental understanding of money management. This is as a result of parents' generous financial contributions to their kids' school life and the absence of any school courses on money management. However, this problem can be resolved by encouraging kids to work during the summer and introducing lessons on financial management in the classroom.

To begin with, parents are providing their children with allowance without establishing any boundaries, which is one of the major factors that contribute to a student's failure to handle money properly. Children typically lack the ability to manage money, as they tend to spend all the money they are given and constantly ask their parents for more. Most parents cannot ignore their children’s demands due to familial bonding and emotional attachment. Additionally, schools prioritize fundamental artistic or scientific classes over the children's inescapable exposure to money management in the real world.

However, to reduce this growing problem, parents must encourage their pupils to get summer jobs. This will help them learn the value of money, thereby managing it in an effective way. Psychologists frequently stress the value of youngsters working to earn money because it helps them become more responsible and better resource managers in the long run. On top of that, schools are advised to introduce money management classes. By emphasizing the importance of managing money, students are guided to make good use of their allowance.

To summarize, the main reasons why students graduate from high school without understanding how to handle money are parents' unrestricted offerings to their kids and the lack of financial education in the classroom. Therefore, to solve this problem, schools must revise their curricula to include courses on money management, and they must also encourage students to work during the summer to get some hands-on learning on their financial literacy.

Sample 13:

There is a common problem amongst high school graduates these days where students are leaving school without any knowledge or skills in personal money management. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.

The lack of money management skills among high school graduates stems from various factors. One primary cause is that most high school students live with their parents and rely entirely on them financially. Since students usually do not have to work for money during high school, as their parents cover all their expenses, they lack an understanding of earning and saving money. Moreover, the only money students receive is typically in the form of pocket money, meant to be spent. As a result, young people primarily learn how to spend money but not how to earn, save, or manage it wisely.

Several effective solutions can address this issue. Firstly, basic money management skills should be made a mandatory subject for high school students, equipping them with the necessary knowledge and skills to handle their finances after graduation, when they move out and start working. Additionally, parents should ensure their children receive adequate education in financial matters to help them maintain a successful and independent financial situation after leaving home.

In conclusion, while money management poses a challenge for many school leavers, there are several viable solutions to mitigate this problem.

Sample 14:

It is common that students complete their schooling without learning to manage their finances. Lacking proper awareness of its relevance, both parents and schools fail to provide the required attention on financial literacy. To aid future generations not to struggle with their finances once they leave school, parents and schools must take joint measures.

Parents and schools do not accept money management as a life skill and hence, put no effort to teach the subject to their children. Moreover, parents support their children financially throughout their schooling only to learn conventional subjects ignoring a relevant subject like financial management. Schools also take up no particular interest in teaching students on money and rather choose to stay with learning and retrieving some subjects that may not be significant once they leave school. For instance, in India where many children start to prepare for many competitive examinations when they are at their high school but often ignores many life skills like managing their expenses.

How can our children be made to master this subject along with other topics at school?  Rather than managing all the financials of their children, parents can assist children to set up their budget, manage expenses and save money from a young age. Furthermore, fundamentals of financial management can be made part of the syllabus for high school students to help children stay away from habits like compulsive buying and over- consumption that do not serve them. Not only does this help children to cut down their expenses but also make them stay away from any financial scams.

In conclusion, more students leave their schools with no proper education to look after their finances. This is primarily because of the parents and schools who fail to acknowledge the topic’s significance; but joint efforts can ensure concrete results.

Sample 15:

Many students do not know about managing their finances despite completing their school education. There could be several factors creating this issue; however, it can be tackled if this topic is included as a main subject in the school curriculum.

Even though financial literacy is important, it is still not included as a main subject in the school syllabus. This is probably because many think that money management is an art that one learns when one faces the real world, and not by cramming some theoretical concepts. Secondly, in many countries, teenagers are mollycoddled by their parents, and therefore, are not allowed to earn. This results in teenagers being naive about disbursing their funds wisely. For example, in India, it is commonly seen that parents make most of the major financial decisions for their children until the age of 20 or 21.

However, this issue can be resolved if certain measures are implemented. These days, there are courses on financial education that can make a massive difference. Youngsters may be able to make smart financial decisions owing to such courses and save themselves from a lot of trouble. Besides, teenagers should be encouraged to take part-time jobs while studying so that they understand the effort which is put in in order to earn.  For instance, it has been usually seen that youngsters, who work hard to earn money, ensure that they utilize and invest it wisely rather than just squandering it away.

To conclude, students leaving high school without gaining knowledge on managing their finances is a common issue that arises because this topic is not given significance in schools and at home, but this situation can be tackled if teenagers are encouraged to take up jobs and manage their own money wisely.

Sample 16:

Many young people do not have basic knowledge of financial management when they leave school. This lack of knowledge is primarily due to upbringing and limited education at school.

One of the main reasons is that young people are dependent on their parents and get everything for free until they complete secondary education. Parents always want their children to be happy and successful, and in order to do this, they hide financial pressure and provide them with enough money. Another reason is the school curriculum. Subjects included in the curriculum, such as science, mathematics, or languages, do not teach real life skills. Consequently, high school students are used to answering theoretical questions, but they find it strange to balance their income and expenses. As a result, both parents and teachers fail to prepare their children for the real world.

This is indeed a cause for concern, but fortunately, there are some solutions. Parents should consider giving their children a certain amount of money each month and insisting that they have enough for a whole month, which will encourage the child to monitor their spending habits. As the child grows, they should teach them how to manage household expenses and also involve him in the decision-making process, or they may make the child responsible for the household for a day or two. Secondly, the school administration should include a life management skills course in the final year. This will help students learn how their finances should be planned and managed.

To conclude, it is essential that young people learn financial management skills beyond the regular course, and both parents and teachers play a vital role in achieving this by equipping them with the necessary knowledge.

Sample 1:

Museums play a significant role in society, sparking debate over whether their primary function is to entertain or to educate. Some argue that museums should be enjoyable spaces that entertain visitors, while others believe their main purpose is to educate. This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide reasons why I support the latter view.

On one hand, many people consider museums as tourist attractions designed to entertain. These institutions aim to showcase a collection of intriguing objects that will draw a large audience. For the average visitor, an emphasis on enjoyment is crucial as extensive educational content can be overwhelming and may lead to boredom. For example, the Louvre Museum in Paris, France, strikes a balance between enjoyment and education. It presents its vast collection through interactive exhibits and thematic displays, ensuring that both casual visitors and art enthusiasts find the experience engaging. This approach contributes to the Louvre's status as a premier global tourist destination, attracting millions of visitors each year.

On the other hand, I do believe that the primary objective of museums should be to educate visitors. Exhibitions are meant to teach something new, enriching visitors' knowledge and understanding. Many museums employ professional guides or provide headsets with detailed commentary to enhance the educational experience. The British Museum in London exemplifies this commitment by using multimedia guides to offer in-depth information about exhibits, helping visitors grasp the historical and cultural significance of the artifacts. Similarly, museums like the War Remnants Museum in Vietnam and the Vietnamese Women's Museum focus on educating the public through their extensive collections, which illustrate the cultural and historical impact of significant events. These museums use interpretive displays and interactive exhibits to provide context, fostering a deeper understanding of their collections.

In conclusion, while museums can serve as enjoyable attractions, I am of the opinion that their fundamental purpose is to educate.

Sample 2:

Museums have long been seen as bastions of knowledge, preserving artifacts and educating the public. However, there is a growing debate about whether museums should primarily entertain visitors or focus on their educational role. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide my own viewpoint.

Advocates for museums as entertainment venues argue that making museums enjoyable attracts a broader audience. When museums incorporate interactive exhibits, multimedia displays, and engaging activities, they become more appealing to visitors of all ages, particularly young people. For example, the Vietnam Museum of Ethnology has integrated interactive displays that allow visitors to experience traditional Vietnamese crafts firsthand, making the visit both enjoyable and informative. If museums were solely focused on education without an element of entertainment, attendance might decrease, limiting their impact. Additionally, a more entertaining approach can spark curiosity and a desire to learn, creating a more profound and lasting educational experience. It can be argued that if museums fail to entertain, they may not fully engage their audience.

However, I believe that the primary function of museums should be to educate. Museums hold a wealth of knowledge and serve as custodians of cultural heritage, which is essential for fostering a well-informed society. In Vietnam, museums such as the War Remnants Museum play a crucial role in educating visitors about the country’s history and the impacts of war. Through meticulously curated exhibits, these museums provide in-depth knowledge that entertainment-focused venues cannot match. If the educational aspect of museums were diminished, society would lose a vital resource for learning about history, science, and art. Furthermore, educational museums contribute to the development of critical thinking and cultural awareness, which are invaluable in today's globalized world.

In conclusion, while making museums enjoyable can attract more visitors and enhance the learning experience, their primary mission should remain educational. By prioritizing education, museums can ensure that they continue to serve as vital institutions for knowledge and cultural preservation. Balancing both elements, however, could be the key to maximizing their potential and broadening their appeal.

Sample 3:

The museum, the house of history and art, has long been a popular destination for people who love to wander back in time. Along with its popularity, there is a controversial argument about whether museums should be entertaining or focus more seriously on delivering educational content. I believe that museums should fulfill both functions, and I shall discuss my opinion in this essay.

The educational value of museums is undeniable. They are now found all around the world and function as places to preserve, study, and display works related to history, arts, culture, science, and so on. When attending exhibitions, visitors have a chance to listen to guidances, commentaries, or even mini lectures about specific topics, delivered by on-site guides or via headsets. This combination of auditory assistance and visual elements greatly improves the learning experience. Museums seem to bring history to life; visitors can feel the stories through artifacts, sense the atmosphere of a thousand years ago, and connect with the emotions and passions that are preserved within these spaces.

However, scientists believe we are entering an era in which humans' attention spans have substantially decreased.  This is one reason why museums are adjusting to make their material more appealing to the general audience. For example, the Hoa Lo Prison Relic in Vietnam has effectively utilized social media to gain significant engagement, especially among Gen Z and adults. By creating educational and humorous content that is relevant to current trends and the language of youngsters, and combining this with interactive activities and games, the museum has become as popular as other entertainment destinations. Every month, it welcomes a large number of visitors, both Vietnamese and foreigners. The success of this concept demonstrates that museums can be both educational and entertaining.

Finally, I believe that museums should be more than just locations to display old items and provide unending instructional content. Instead, they should be places where people of all ages can learn and have fun together.

Sample 4:

Opinions are divided on whether museums should be utilized for educational or leisure values. In my view, both can be achieved at the same time given that there will be strategies from the governments.

On the one hand, it is understandable why many think museums should perform the function of teaching. Learners are more willing to absorb knowledge through this approach as it appears to be more engaging and interactive than textbooks and in-class lectures. Therefore, by making museums available to the general public, the government can effectively raise awareness about a nation's history and culture, thus fostering mutual respect among locals and foreigners. For instance, the Vietnam National Museum of Fine Arts can inform tourists about the country's different historical periods through a variety of fine arts that it displays.

On the other hand, it is understandable why museums are considered a kind of leisure facility. This is because for many people, visiting museums is a form of escapism, thus they are more intrigued by their aesthetic values and yearn to be immersed in the experience. Some may find educational information helpful to a certain extent in the sense that it helps to explain the arcane meanings behind, for instance, an abstract painting or the historical context of an exhibit. However, too much of it would bore the visitors and cause the places to lose their artistic appeal. From my perspective, this dilemma can be addressed by striking a balance between entertainment and education. One method to achieve this is for governments to incorporate technological advances to make the learning process more fascinating. For example, visitors to Hoa Lo Prison Relic have the option to rent individual headsets that provide detailed commentary about each artifact, allowing the chance to learn about the place at one's own pace.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that museums play a crucial role in both informing and entertaining people. As a result, efforts should be made to combine these two aspects, offering visitors a fulfilling learning experience.

Sample 5:

Museums serve as repositories of culture, history, and knowledge, prompting a debate over whether their primary function should be entertainment or education. While some argue for museums as enjoyable spaces for entertainment, others emphasize their educational role.

On the one hand, supporters of museums as entertainment venues argue that making exhibits enjoyable and engaging attracts more visitors, increasing the reach of cultural and historical knowledge. Interactive displays, multimedia presentations, and immersive experiences can captivate audiences, making learning more engaging and enjoyable. Furthermore, by adding entertainment value, museums can generate more revenue through ticket sales and donations, ensuring their long-term viability. For example, Chicago’s Museum of Science and Industry attracts large crowds year-round with hands-on exhibits and interactive demonstrations that appeal to visitors of all ages. This approach not only teaches visitors about scientific concepts, but it also generates revenue for the museum, allowing it to constantly update and improve its exhibits.

Advocates for museums as educational institutions argue that their primary function is to preserve, study, and disseminate knowledge. Museums fulfill their responsibility to educate the public about art, history, science, and other subjects by putting educational content and curatorial integrity first. Exhibits that challenge visitors to think critically and engage with complex ideas promote intellectual growth and cultural literacy, resulting in a better understanding of the world. For example, a museum may host a temporary exhibit on the history of colonialism that presents multiple perspectives and encourages visitors to consider the impact of colonization on various cultures. This type of exhibit not only teaches visitors about a complex historical topic, but also encourages them to consider their own beliefs and values.

In conclusion, museums play a multifaceted role in society, balancing the need to entertain with the responsibility to educate. Striking this balance ensures that museums remain relevant and valuable resources for both enjoyment and enlightenment.

Sample 6:

It is an incontestable fact that museums play a crucial role in students’ lives and always generate a debatable discussion in the current aeon. Some individuals believe that a museum can also serve its purpose as a fun and entertainment zone, while others think that it is the place to attain knowledge. In the forthcoming paragraphs, this discourse explains the different perspectives of visiting museums and my certitude to the former stance with numerous illustrations.

To begin with, some parents and educational management feel that museums must provide not only knowledge but also inculcate fun activities. The modern changes in science and technological resources are placed in the exhibits such that children are updated on these latest inventions. For instance, it encourages pupils from nearby areas to conduct science competitions annually with regard to the new discoveries and the best projects are placed on display for the public. Apart from this, they had established the set up of a planetarium within the premises. This eventually creates interest in adolescents visiting museums frequently. Thus, with the implementation of these latest changes, children benefit from knowledge as well as entertainment.

On the flip side, few people in the society believe that museums’ sole notion is to provide education. Firstly, it is mandatory to preserve our ancestor’s lifestyle. They are the only place which contains the history of the origin of mankind. Hence it is our duty to protect the ancient artefacts rather than replacing them with modern equipment. Secondly, it increases the mental ability of children with regular visits. For example, faculty members who teach history must volunteer and organize field trips, though it is seen as studious by some pupils. This gradually increases interest by practically explaining the livelihood of the generations over the centuries throughout the world.

To sum up, this essay has explained the significance of museums as a place to attain wisdom as well as for fun activities. Although, in my personal opinion, it is critical for kids and young adults to have entertainment along with their routine studies.

Sample 7:

Museums serve a dual role in society, with some arguing that they should primarily be entertaining, while others emphasize their educational function. Both perspectives have valid points, but I believe that museums should prioritize education while also providing an enjoyable experience.

On one hand, proponents of the entertainment aspect argue that making museums enjoyable can attract a wider audience. This approach could involve interactive exhibits, immersive technology, and engaging displays. For instance, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York has successfully incorporated virtual reality experiences and interactive installations, making art more appealing to younger generations.

However, the educational purpose of museums should not be overlooked. Museums offer a unique opportunity to learn about history, culture, and art. For instance, the British Museum provides an extensive collection of historical artifacts, which helps visitors understand the evolution of human civilization. It's essential to strike a balance between enjoyment and education to create a fulfilling museum experience.

In my opinion, museums should primarily focus on education. They should offer in-depth information, guided tours, and workshops to help visitors gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter. An example is the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., which combines informative exhibits with interactive displays, creating a well- rounded educational experience.

In conclusion, while providing entertainment in museums is crucial to attract diverse audiences, education should be the primary purpose. By achieving a balance between these aspects, museums can both entertain and educate visitors effectively, offering an enriching experience for all.

Sample 8:

People have different views about the role and function of museums. In my opinion, museums can and should be both entertaining and educational.

On the one hand, it can be argued that the main role of a museum is to entertain. Museums are tourist attractions, and their aim is to exhibit a collection of interesting objects that many people want to see. The average visitor may become bored if he or she has to read or listen to too much educational content, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. This type of museum is designed to be visually spectacular, and it may have interactive activities or even games as part of its exhibitions.

On the other hand, some people argue that museums should focus on education. The aim of any exhibition should be to teach visitors something that they did not previously know. Usually this means that the history behind the museum’s exhibits needs to be explained, and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ professional guides to talk to their visitors, while other museums offer headsets so that visitors can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. This way, museums can play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.

In conclusion, it seems to me that a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience so that people can both have fun and learn something at the same time.

Sample 9:

People hold different views about the role of museums. While some people think that museums should be enjoyable places with entertaining activities, I am more inclined towards the opinion that museums are places for education.

On the one hand, it is understandable why people subscribe to the former idea. The most compelling justification is tourist attractions. This is because tourists might be bored with too much educational content in a quiet environment and there is no interesting object that many people want to see. Consequently, museums will be no longer attractive places for tourists. Having entertaining activities helps people find visiting museums interesting and museums will be enjoyable places to come for tourists. As a result, museums can gain their income so that they can continue their work effectively.

On the other hand, there are several reasons in support of the idea that educating is the purpose of museums. A very important point to consider is that it educates people about their past culture and generations. Lots of people today do not really know about their origins and historical lives because they are often busy with their work and business. Therefore, they do not have time to search for historical things. Museums help people widen their historical knowledge and be aware of the importance of old culture, playing a significant role in historical preservation.

In conclusion, above mentioned facts have created a dilemma, and it is still a controversial issue. While there are some good arguments in favour of entertainment in museums, I am more convinced that museums are places for education.

Sample 10:

Museums have long been seen as institutions of learning and preservation of culture and history. However, there is an ongoing debate on whether museums should primarily be enjoyable places that entertain people or should focus on their educational purpose. Personally, I believe that museums can successfully combine both aspects to create a well-rounded experience for visitors.

On the one hand, the argument that museums should be entertaining has its merits. Museums can become more appealing if they include interactive exhibits and engaging activities. Entertainment can enhance the visitor experience, making the learning process more enjoyable and memorable. Take modern art museums as an example. These places often host live performances and interactive installations, which attract a diverse audience and make the visit more dynamic and engaging. By incorporating elements of entertainment, museums can attract a wider audience, including those who might not typically visit for purely educational reasons.

On the other hand, the educational purpose of museums should not be overlooked. The primary goal of museums is to preserve and convey historical, cultural, and scientific knowledge. Education is essential for maintaining and transmitting valuable knowledge to future generations. For example, natural history museums provide in-depth insights into natural history and evolution, helping both children and adults gain a better understanding of our world. By focusing on education, museums can ensure that they remain relevant and valuable as sources of knowledge and cultural preservation.

To conclude, while the debate on whether museums should entertain or educate continues, it is clear that both elements are essential for a successful museum experience. Museums should strive to strike a balance between being enjoyable and educational to attract a broad audience and provide a meaningful and enriching experience for all visitors.

Sample 11:

Museums have long stood as custodians of culture and history, but modern debates question whether their role should lean more toward education or entertainment. From my perspective, the most effective museums are those that harmoniously blend entertainment with education.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that entertainment in museums should be encouraged. To begin with, as museums are tourist attractions, their visitors are mainly families and younger people who might find traditional museum setups staid and boring. By integrating interactive displays and immersive technologies, museums like the Museum of Marine Life in Vietnam have successfully increased visitor engagement. Furthermore, entertainment acts as an effective medium for education; it introduces complex educational content in a manner that is easy to digest. For example, interactive historical games or scientific simulations can make learning both fun and memorable, ensuring that visitors leave with a lasting impression and a deeper understanding of the exhibits.

Conversely, the educational role of museums is undeniably critical. Indeed, museums are entrusted with the conservation of cultural heritage and the dissemination of knowledge. They offer invaluable learning experiences that are more authoritative and detailed than those found in many other settings. For instance, the detailed curation of artifacts in museums like the British Museum provides profound insights into human history and culture that cannot be replicated by purely entertaining experiences. Moreover, maintaining educational rigor ensures that museums continue to serve as important cultural and historical repositories, fostering a society that values and understands its heritage and the world around it.

In conclusion, while the debate between entertainment and education in museums is complex, the integration of both aspects can lead to more dynamic and impactful institutions.

Sample 12:

A museum is a space that exhibits artifacts from various eras.  There are differing opinions on the role of museums like some argue that museums should be enjoyable spaces designed to entertain visitors, while others assert that the primary purpose of museums is to serve as educational institutions. Considering both perspectives will contribute to shaping my own understanding of the role of museums.

To begin with, some people advocate museums to be enjoyable places to enhance accessibility and engagement. By making museums entertaining, a broader audience can be attracted, including individuals who might not traditionally be interested in art, history, or other subjects typically covered by museums. Creating an enjoyable can make cultural and educational experiences more accessible to a diverse range of people.

In addition, enjoyable museums can have a more significant educational impact. When people find a museum visit enjoyable, they are likely to spend more time exploring exhibits, interacting with displays, and absorbing information. A positive and entertaining experience can make learning more memorable. For example, when students visit museums of historical importance, they get a better understanding of past events.

Alternatively, some people emphasize the educational role of museums which often house artifacts, artworks, and historical objects that hold significant cultural and historical value. These institutions serve as custodians of our collective heritage, providing a platform to showcase and preserve important aspects of human history. The primary focus on education ensures that visitors can learn about and appreciate the cultural, artistic, and scientific achievements of different societies.

Last but not least, museums promote critical thinking and understanding. Museums are seen as spaces where visitors can engage with information, ideas, and perspectives that may be unfamiliar to them. Museums aim to stimulate intellectual curiosity and encourage visitors to think critically about the world around them ranging from science and history to art and culture.

To sum up, after scanning both the views, I reach a conclusion that a museum should fulfill a dual role, acting as an inviting space for entertainment to attract a wider audience, while acknowledging its undeniable educational value. The primary mission of a museum is to bridge the gap between the past and the present by introducing historical perspectives.

Sample 13:

People have different views about the purpose of museums in modern society. While it's true that museums - as tourist attractions - should be fascinating, I stand by the idea that the main role of the museum is to give knowledge of cultural, religious and historical importance.

On the one hand, it can be argued that museums should be entertaining and more attractive to the public. Museums are widely considered as important tourist attractions of any city or country. However, there's a common belief that they are too elitist, uninspiring and only encourage educated people to visit. By adding more entertainment values, museums can appeal to a broader audience. Nowadays there is also a wide range of museums which do not have academic purpose; but more light-hearted and humorous theme; for example, chocolate museum in Belgium, kimchi museum in South Korea, museum of Broken Relationships in Croatia or cheese museum in The Netherlands.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that the main purpose of museums is to educate people as they exhibit collections of interesting objects that hold great cultural or historical value. The aim of any exhibition is to teach visitors things that they didn't know before. To achieve that, museums usually offer free guided tours with professional guides or give away brochures, guidebooks, audio tapes that contain detailed information about the exhibitions. By doing that, museums should play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.

In conclusion, I think museums, as educational institutions, should offer educative, interesting and enjoyable experiences to visitors.

Sample 14:

Normally, museums are considered to have a vital function in serving their public for educational purpose, yet many museum goers also aim to seek an entertainment experience, which, I believe, is nearly impossible to end up with a 'purely entertaining' experience.  

There is no doubt that the primary role of museums is to educate the public. They provide tangible objects and collections that can be genuinely seen and touched by students. This provides excellent field trips for extensions of a classroom as well as enhancing their curriculum. If they were changed to be entertaining-oriented to attract more visitors, then the quality of art or history would probably be degraded or distorted, hence weakening the function of educating. Eventually, museums would be nothing less like theme parks, focusing on generating profits rather than benefiting the public.

However, there is also another voice claiming that museums should be interesting and playful, providing a relaxing place for people to have fun in their leisure time. Once they are solely built for learning without even a little of enjoyment, they would lose popularity and even financial support due to failing to attract enough visitors.

My view is that education and entertainment don't necessarily have to be mutually exclusive motivations for coming to the museum, but they can be integrated to achieve both aims. In fact, from our own school experience, we are more likely to be motivated to explore if content is truly entertaining, and meanwhile, if we can gain something meaningful through recreation, then it's a win-win situation.

Nevertheless, at their core, museums are educational institutions, albeit in a unique and interesting way which differs from a traditional one in schools.

Sample 15:

Museums play important roles in today’s society. With regard to this, there is an often-debated topic on what purpose museums should serve. While some believe that they should serve as amusement centers, others hold the view that their primary aim should be to educate. Both sides of the argument will be discussed in this essay before a conclusion is reached.

On the one hand, a growing number of people believe that museums should be strictly for entertainment because the government generates substantial revenue from them. They claim that people get attracted from all over the world just to watch ancient exhibitions and get good value for money. A prime example is Egypt. Her national museum, which houses artifacts and ancient paintings, attracts tourists from different parts of the world. In the same vein, a recent report by Africa Union revealed that a significant twenty percent of their revenue is generated from this. In addition, this fund could be used to establish other amusement centers.

On the other hand, some argue that the best purpose of museums is to educate. This is because they say museums contain relics and kinds of literature from the historical background of a nation and that it is the ideal place to learn and appreciate their heritage. If every student from elementary to the tertiary level of education visited the museum, the knowledge imparted can birth fierce patriotism which is a very relevant attitude for national development. For instance, every Russian is taught to visit the museum from their early cognitive stage of development, and this could explain the strong passion they have for their country. It is thus understandable why many people support this view.

After examining both sides of the argument, it is true that museums are a good platform for entertainment. Nonetheless, I believe that their role in education is more impactful to society.

Sample 1:

There have been calls for large corporations to build sports and social facilities for the local communities where they operate. In my view, I would agree on the grounds that these facilities can strengthen communal bonds and promote a company’s image in a positive light.

Firstly, as most people are increasingly beset with professional and familial duties, they often lack the time to participate in communal activities and forge meaningful connections with one another. By constructing sports and social facilities, these companies can grant these people the appropriate setting for them to participate in common activities. This is evident in cities well-known for quality of life such as Hanoi where most of the parks there have been built by Vinaconex, one of the largest companies in Vietnam. Hence, most of the local denizens are able to engage in conversation with each other and forge new relationships during holiday seasons or through recreational activities held in those parks.

Secondly, the provision of communal facilities can create a positive image of the sponsoring companies. These facilities promulgate a sense that the sponsors are giving back to the community and fulfilling public promises of social responsibility. This can therefore build trust between these large companies and the local people. To cite one instance, Nostrand Ltd., a latex manufacturer based in upstate New York, provided funding for local sports centers in various towns across the state, enabling their citizens to engage in various community-based sports. A by-product of this act is residents there now appreciate the brand and purchase the company’s products at a higher rate.

In conclusion, large companies should be encouraged to provide sports and social facilities for local communities as they can help strengthen communal bonds and promote their brand. Such facilities will continue to flourish in the near future because of these decided benefits.

Sample 2:

It has been suggested that big businesses should support local communities by providing facilities for people to socialise and play sports. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this point of view as supporting local communities should not be the responsibility of businesses.

Firstly, the provision of such facilities should be the duty of the government, not businesses. Governments collect taxes from citizens, and therefore should be responsible for providing facilities that enhance people’s quality of life. In other words, taxpayers’ money should be used to provide them with a decent standard of living. The welfare of people in the community should not be the concern of local businesses. Instead, they should solely focus on their own growth, making profits, maintaining a competitive edge, and ensuring their development. For example, it seems unfair to force multinational companies into solving local problems that should be handled by local governments.

Secondly, it is better for companies to allocate their resources to other aspects of their business. Most businesses do not have the funds available to simultaneously support the local community and promote their own growth. Sports and social facilities might be too expensive, deterring companies from further developing. It would be better if money could be spent on other aspects of work, such as salary increases, bonuses, and extra time off. This certainly benefits employees, increasing the level of job satisfaction among them, thereby encouraging them to work more diligently. As a result, this contributes to the national economy, helping create a motivated and committed workforce.

In conclusion, I believe that promoting social development and sports in local areas should not be the obligation of large companies but rather that of governments, so that companies can fully concentrate on business growth and employee productivity.

Sample 3:

Opinions vary on whether the provision of sports and social facilities to the local community an obligation for all companies should be. Although I may acknowledge the benefits of this suggestion, I still firmly think that this should not be mandatory for all.

Those who are in favor of companies providing sports and social facilities may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so, companies can enhance their public image. For instance, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local community projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that fulfill their corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, providing sports and social facilities can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company. Access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase overall job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately benefits the company.

Nevertheless, I am firmly against the notion that all companies should be responsible for providing these facilities. One primary concern is that not all companies have the financial capability to undertake such initiatives. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, may struggle to allocate funds for community projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing sports and social facilities traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess community needs and allocate resources accordingly. While corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts.

In conclusion, while it is beneficial for companies to provide sports and social facilities to the local community, this should not be an obligation for all companies. Large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to community development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives; however, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake such projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.

Sample 4:

Whether sports and social facilities should be built by large corporations for the local community has become a topic of discussion. From my viewpoint, I strongly believe that this practice is reasonable and beneficial for both the locals and the businesses.

First of all, that large corporations build community facilities would improve the local’s welfare tremendously. Benefits and funds allocated to different areas in a country will vary depending on their economic and political importance. That is why in Vietnam, provinces like Hai Phong are less developed than Ho Chi Minh City or Hanoi, thus locals of Hai Phong do not have the chance to experience top-notch facilities as in big cities. Nevertheless, Hai Phong is home to various factories of well-known brands. If these businesses help pay for the construction of sports and recreational facilities in the province, Hai Phong’s citizens would have equal quality of life as Hanoians. Since the government cannot invest uniformly throughout a country, large enterprises building local facilities would be a great help in improving the country’s social welfare.

Moreover, providing sports and social facilities for the local community is a way for businesses to fulfill their corporate social responsibility. As a matter of fact, all corporations are bound to give back to the community in one way or another. However, in comparison to doing charities or organizing marathons, providing the community with sports and social facilities would leave a more lasting impact and on a much larger scale. Not only that people from different social classes can make use of the given installations, but these facilities would last for many years to come, reminding the locals of the businesses’ good deeds.

In conclusion, it is recommended that large businesses give back to the community by equipping them with sports and social facilities. In this way, the community’s welfare and the companies’ image would simultaneously be promoted positively.

Sample 5:

Whether large corporations should provide sports and social facilities within their local communities has been a cause for debate in recent years. While some claim that corporations should only be driven towards generating profit, I believe otherwise, as there are causes for doing so, and significant benefits that may arise from this.

On the one hand, this might be a frivolous idea because a corporation's usual responsibility is to its shareholders, and not the broader community. It is often believed that large organizations, firstly, should focus on staying profitable to sustain their own health. By emphasizing their core business and maximizing profits, corporations could indirectly contribute to society by creating employment, improving the economy in the locality where they operate as a result. Public welfare, furthermore, is chiefly the government's responsibility, not businesses’. Instead of having companies build sports and community facilities, the state can utilize tax revenue and fund the aforementioned public amenities and services instead.

There might be a case to argue for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities, however. Initially, large companies have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These gargantuan organizations, which may operate globally and generate substantial profits, should devote some of their resources for the public good, because they were able to take advantage of rules and regulations where they operate for business gain. Besides that, an initiative such as this fosters community spirit and a positive environment. A local area would appear livelier and more reputable if recreational and social facilities exist for the community to gather at and participate in various activities. This, in turn, has the added effect of enabling it to attract further investment, sparking economic growth.

In conclusion, despite the claim that large companies ought to be profit-driven, I agree with them contributing to their local communities by establishing sports facilities and the like for public use. However, rather than being mandated, such a contribution should be encouraged and incentivized by the state, so that all parties involved may derive maximum benefit.

Sample 6:

The role of large companies in supporting their local communities has long been debated, particularly regarding whether they should provide sports and social facilities. While some argue that this responsibility falls outside their primary business objectives, others contend that such initiatives can yield numerous benefits. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Those who oppose the idea of large companies funding community sports and social facilities argue that these corporations should focus on their core business activities. They believe that diverting resources to non-essential projects could negatively impact a company's profitability and competitive edge. For instance, the allocation of funds to build a community sports center might limit investment in research and development, potentially stifling innovation. Moreover, the responsibility for public amenities traditionally lies with the government, which is better equipped to manage such projects efficiently. However, it is also argued that companies have a social obligation to give back to the communities where they operate, as this can enhance their reputation and foster goodwill among local residents.

However, I believe that providing sports and social facilities can significantly benefit both the community and the company itself. Firstly, these facilities can promote a healthier lifestyle among residents, reducing the prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart conditions. For example, in Vietnam, where urbanization has led to a more sedentary lifestyle, access to community sports centers can encourage regular physical activity. Furthermore, the presence of such amenities can foster a sense of community and improve social cohesion, making the area more attractive to potential employees and investors. If companies invested in these facilities, they would likely see a positive impact on employee morale and productivity, as a healthier and happier workforce is more engaged and efficient.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I am convinced that large companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for their local communities. Not only does this fulfill a social responsibility, but it also offers tangible benefits that can enhance both community well-being and corporate success. By investing in such initiatives, companies can create a more supportive environment for their employees and contribute to the overall development of the areas in which they operate.

Sample 7:

Exercise and social interaction are obviously essential for human life in general. As a result, some argue that businesses ought to offer local communities sports and social amenities. Since people can take pleasure in it and share their expertise, in my opinion, it appears to be advantageous to the majority.

In today's world, one way that people can lend a helping hand to their communities is by bringing up a cultural exposition and permitting members of the general public to display their own works of handicraft there. If they charge a fee to get in, not only will they be able to provide entertainment for their guests, but they will also be able to collect cash. In addition, it has the potential to serve as a tourism destination in each region, which has the dual effect of benefiting both society and the economy. In addition to this, the populace might pick up tidbits of information by working together as a team with a large corporation. Despite this, the events could end up costing a significant amount of money.

But there are many businesses on Earth. Several people from different places, families, and communities work for the same business. Putting in place sports and social facilities could be good for both societies and businesses. For a sports facility, a company might hold a sports event or sports day that local people can join. As a result, this may get most people to care more about their health and bodies. Also, it is likely to help people in the community get along well with each other.

In conclusion, even if a substantial budget is necessary, it is well worth it to have the sports and social facilities available because there are many benefits associated with doing so. It has the potential to enhance both the community and the general welfare of the population.

Sample 8:

Organizations are often urged to provide recreational and entertainment facilities such as gyms, cafes, and movie theaters for the local community. For many reasons, this is an assertion with which I agree wholeheartedly.

To begin with, amenities should be offered to the whole society as local communities are the most important group of society. It would be mutually beneficial to both the company’s sector and the communal group. In the first place, a great number of residents invest a significant portion of their free time in order to acquire the advantages of provided facilities; thus, they end up shelling out a significant amount of money. Therefore, businesses have the opportunity to boost their revenues by capitalizing on this repeated pattern.

Building hospitals and shopping centers can make people's lives better. This makes people more likely to try new things and do well in their communities. Second, making games and activities for the public helps people stay healthy. In addition, this trend of increasing numbers of businesses adopted in the modern era has resulted in the creation of a large number of jobs as well as a diverse array of entertainment options for people. This will not only boost the overall income but also enhance the economical condition of the economy in the global platform. 

To conclude, I am of the opinion that the preceding remarks lend support to the viewpoint that businesses ought to build social and sports facilities for domestic consumers because, in the long run, there will be benefits for both parties involved.

Sample 9:

Every individual, organization, and government in a community bears a unique obligation toward its members and toward society as a whole. This idea that the party needs to provide social amenities for the general population is one with which I fully disagree. In this essay, I will first provide a discussion of the topic at hand, then move on to offer a conclusion that is supported by logic.

Every nation has private teams that support its economy. They can offer an appropriate environment for the schooling of common people, as well as recruit individuals and pay them regular incomes. As a result, they assist in reducing unemployment. In addition, they may offer their personnel greater amenities including health care, sports facilities, and educational amenities. As a result, their workforce works harder and more enthusiastically, which ultimately produces positive results. More staff are required as a result of increased financial activity and additional benefits. The government can reduce unemployment with the aid of such a function.

However, if the club participates in additional activities, such as promoting social facilities, it is possible that its members will become distracted from the primary objective. In contrast, because members of private groups are responsible for paying their own costs and expenses along with their benefits, these groups are cost conscious. Additionally, they do not enjoy spending money in this sector. If kids are forced to participate in these activities, they probably won't do very well.

To sum up, to the best of my knowledge, it is preferable for the general public, businesses, and the government for this activity to be carried out by an organization that is not-for-profit or charitable, and businesses stand to gain more if they improve working conditions for their employees.

Sample 10:

It is often argued that major corporations are obliged to construct sporting and social facilities for local residents. I largely agree with this view, considering the positive contributions of such initiatives to the local community and companies themselves.

It is understandable why some individuals oppose the idea of placing community obligations on corporations. Specifically, establishing and maintaining such facilities often requires tremendous investment, which could otherwise be allocated towards core business activities. For instance, instead of building a public sports complex, a company could use these funds to develop innovative products or enhance operational efficiency. This redirection of resources is essential for staying competitive and ensuring long-term growth, both of which are aligned with a company’s primary business goals. Additionally, as companies usually prioritize areas where they operate, solely relying on them for such facilities may lead to unequal access across different communities. To address this issue, the government should play a key role in providing sports and social facilities using taxpayer funds.

Despite the opposition to the proposed social responsibilities for large corporations, I believe they should still contribute to the expansion of public infrastructure. Firstly, as regular physical activity is important for preventing chronic diseases and promoting overall well-being, the corporate provision of sporting facilities can foster a healthier community. For example, funded by Google, the recreational centers in Mountain View, California offer residents a space to exercise, socialize, and relax, thereby reducing stress and enhancing their mental health. Secondly, the construction of community facilities can enhance a company’s reputation and strengthen its brand loyalty. When a company invests in the local community, it sends a strong message about its commitment to social obligations, potentially promoting customer loyalty and attracting more talented candidates who strictly value corporate social responsibility.

In summary, although some individuals may argue against placing community obligations on corporations due to potential financial strain and unequal access, I believe that such initiatives should still be highly encouraged as they would contribute to a healthier society and better brand recognition.

Sample 11:

The debate over whether large corporations should offer sports and social facilities in their local communities has been ongoing. While some argue that corporations should focus solely on profit generation, I disagree, as there are compelling reasons and significant benefits associated with such initiatives.

On one hand, it may seem frivolous to expect corporations to prioritize community welfare over profitability. It is commonly held that corporations should first and foremost ensure their profitability and sustainability. By focusing on their core business and maximizing profits, corporations indirectly contribute to society by creating jobs and boosting local economies. Public welfare, moreover, is primarily the responsibility of governments, not businesses. Instead of companies investing in sports and community facilities, governments can utilize tax revenues to fund such public amenities and services.

However, there is a case to be made for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities. Large corporations have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These global entities, which often earn substantial profits, should allocate resources to the public good, considering the benefits they derive from the regulatory environments in which they operate. Such initiatives also promote community spirit and a positive atmosphere. Communities with recreational and social facilities tend to be more vibrant and attractive, thereby fostering economic growth.

In conclusion, while it is argued that corporations should prioritize profit, I support their involvement in providing sports and social facilities for the community. Rather than mandatory, such contributions should be encouraged and incentivized by governments to maximize benefits for all stakeholders.

Sample 12:

There is a lot of debate about who should pay for recreational facilities in communities. Although some people believe the business sector should provide these facilities, it is my opinion that this is the role of government.

Some people think that companies should do more to support local communities. By providing sports and social facilities, it is argued that companies can directly benefit communities. Sports facilities will mean the local people are healthier and social facilities will provide meeting places and cultural attractions which will enrich people’s lives. However, it is likely that companies will see this as a way to advertise and may build facilities simply to improve the image of their brand.

Personally, I believe that the government should be responsible for providing recreational facilities. If they are provided by the government, facilities can be advertising-free, aimed solely at improving life in the community. Taxes on businesses could be used to fund these facilities, but the building and maintenance should be carried out by the government. All local businesses could be taxed, which would be more effective than just a few companies providing facilities. This solution provides facilities that will improve the community and are paid for by the business sector.

In conclusion, it is important that public facilities remain advertising free and so I believe it is better for the government to provide recreational facilities which could be funded by taxes on businesses. Before the government decides what to build in each area, local communities must be consulted to see what they really need and want.

Sample 13:

Major businesses are expected to contribute to society in the form of providing sporting and other communicative benefits. I strongly agree with this statement because it is their obligation to give back to people which can accelerate social prosperity.

Companies’ profit and revenue depends on people’s favour to their products and service; therefore, the businesses owe to the societies to give them back which could be in terms of donating infrastructure and services. This is resemblance to a win for both ends because a society is benefited from the given facilities, and at the same time, the contributing company can project its presence to a wider group of prospective consumers. Furthermore, from the society’s point of view, it might be too difficult to build sporting arenas and other congregational event spaces spending people’s hard-earned money, whereas big farms can easily build structures that facilitate a community’s engagement, healthcare, education, and employment etc.

Not only assisting with economic problems, but also it stimulates the cultural activities. If there are no places to play sports or gather around, people cannot present their work, share their thoughts, and care each other more directly. In fact, getting together somewhere boosts up emotional attachment among the community members. Furthermore, having the facilities, they can invite music concerts or sport competitions when famous athletes or singers can cause an occasion to bring the people under an umbrella of togetherness which flourishes a community to its best.

To conclude, I believe that big businesses are obliged to provide the society such structural facilities that can help its members to thrive. This social contribution is beneficial to both companies and societies as businesses showcase their presence, and the people are assisted with finance and culture.

Sample 14:

In today’s fast-paced and highly competitive world, the role of companies in contributing to the well-being of local communities has become increasingly important. While some argue that companies should focus solely on their core business activities, I firmly believe that they have a responsibility to provide sports and social facilities for local communities.

First and foremost, companies have a moral obligation to give back to the communities in which they operate. By providing sports and social facilities, they can contribute to the physical and mental well-being of local residents. This can have a positive impact on the overall quality of life in the community and foster a sense of belonging and togetherness among its members.

Moreover, offering sports and social facilities can also be beneficial for companies themselves. By promoting a healthy and active lifestyle, they can improve the physical fitness and overall health of their employees. This, in turn, can lead to increased productivity, reduced absenteeism, and lower healthcare costs. Additionally, providing social facilities such as community centers or event spaces can enhance the company’s reputation and create a positive image in the eyes of the public.

Furthermore, investing in sports and social facilities can help companies build stronger relationships with the local community. By organizing events, tournaments, or social gatherings, companies can create opportunities for interaction and collaboration between their employees and local residents. This can lead to a greater sense of unity and cooperation, ultimately benefiting both the company and the community as a whole.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. Not only does this fulfill their moral obligation to give back, but it also brings about numerous benefits for both the company and the community. It is imperative for companies to recognize the importance of investing in the well-being of local communities and take proactive steps to contribute to their development.

Sample 15:

A bone of contention here is whether large-scale organizations should support the local community by setting up recreational facilities. While there are obvious financial implications involved in this decision, I stand in firm agreement that the aforesaid approach can be proven as a win-win situation for both companies and the general public.

To commence with, the local inhabitants are likely to benefit immensely from this approach’s implementation. To be precise, the availability of a well-equipped sports club in the neighbourhood with sponsorships could pave the way to success for many young athletics, who often are deprived of such facilities owing to the limited funds. In addition, setting up free local commuting, bus shelters, medical camps in the community is beneficial for many people in need. For instance, the ITC organization sponsors the annual marathon in Chennai and sponsors the winner, consequently supporting local runners.

Probing further, the large-scale companies are expected to be equally in gain. First, sponsoring the social events can be a shortcut to increase brand visibility and build a company’s positive image. To put it simply, the large firms can gain the local population’s trust via these events and get their visible support in the company’s future endeavours. To exemplify, Cognizant, a multinational firm, has a dedicated department called corporate social responsibility to support the local community, which has earned it a good reputation on humanitarian grounds.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down stating that sponsorship of sports or social events by the gigantic firms can be equally beneficial for them and local people. Hence companies should contribute more which would be ploughed back to them in the form of goodwill and raising its profile.

Sample 16:

It is a saying that exercising and socializing is a necessity of human life. Thus, some experts suggest that companies should provide sports and social facilities intended for local communities. According to me, it is a beneficiary approach for the majority of the people as it allows them to enjoy and exchange their knowledge. As of today's date, there are several organizations functioning globally. A given organization consists of a number of workers that originate from a different place, family and community. Organizing sports and social facilities helps with the provision of a positive impact on both societies and organizations. This will lead to encouraging more awareness based on health and body. Additionally, it helps with building the foundation for a good relationship between people and community. People can also consider supporting localities by organizing cultural exhibitions and allowing the public to cooperate and display their handicrafts or relevant skills. Along with entertaining visitors, it will also help with generating a sufficient amount of revenue in return. Moreover, it will work as a tourist attraction for the concerned area where it is being organized that will help with enhancement and upliftment of the society and economy at the same time. This will also help with development of skills and knowledge. This will also provide individuals with opportunities to work for big giants and build their own reputation. However, these events might cost a lot of investment for an organization, but eventually it is a positive investment. This will help with building the reputation of the organization and ensure a long-term positive relationship. These initiatives will help with improvement of the lives of locals, help with declining rates of poverty and further ensure decreased crime rates. This will help with increased socialization and communication within their own communities and further ensure that there is a positive bond being built and established. To conclude with, there are a number of advantages that sports, and social facilities will help with, such as raising a lot of funds and several others. It can improve and uplift the living standards of communities.

Sample 17:

Needless to mention that companies intend to sustain sports and local facilities in order for local communities. I strongly agree with the statement as there are a number of factors and these have been discussed in the preceding sections below. I believe that efforts provided by organizations towards creating facilities for employees will build a friendly and productive environment. These will help with building an appropriate workplace environment, develop goals and ensure appropriate employee appreciation. To understand, we can quote the example of Jack Ma, who is the creator of Alibaba and is a successful businessman in today’s era. However, before he started his business, he made an attempt towards building lifelong friendships amongst the members of his concerned team. He was able to yield productivity due to the application of concepts of sports and social facilities that ensured improved relationships and increased productivity for his concerned team. These have proved to be beneficial in the long term to ensure appropriate productivity for his concerned workplace and ensure that employees get appropriate breaks and not unnecessary ones that lead to a loss of productivity at the workplace. It is true that companies always intend to develop their business opportunities in order to ensure increased turnover, improve the quality of the product or service and quality of work for the workers associated with the organization. However, there are few bad outcomes of these kinds of sports and social facilities for local communities, such as making workers irresponsible, and further this will also lead to loss of ability of the workers to ensure productivity on a daily basis. This will also lead the individuals to forget their responsibilities associated with modern companies at the global level. In order to conclude with, providing opportunities for workers to solemnly depend upon the managers of concerned organizations for the purpose of management of worker’s condition at a workplace. On the other hand, organizing sports and social events for local communities is a positive approach towards providing excitement and enjoyment.

Sample 18:

These days companies and global organizations are opting for exploration of several avenues towards ensuring promotion of their companies as well as their products and services. It is a compelling measure to ensure provision of these relevant facilities for local communities. The major move that can be considered is to provide immense support to the individuals that think this is a good initiative. People in today’s era are burdened with responsibilities both in the fields of professional and personal life. Thus, it becomes complicated to ensure active aprticfiaption in communal activities. Organizing these social and sports facilities will help these individuals to actively engage themselves and be part of fun activities and engage with communities at the same time. It will help them with provision of a potential break from their daily life that might be a burden or might seem boring to them. These will help with engaging in active communication with individuals with different mindsets. Additionally, organizations considering these kinds of activities will help embrace the young talents present within the companies. Moreover, these kinds of opportunities will help with showcasing talents and become a part of the limelight. This will also help organizations with opting for brand ambassadors for their product or services. This will encourage communities to educate their children and become a part of these kinds of potential organizations. These events in the long run might turn out to be profitable for the companies as well and help with reaching out to more people and uphold their goods. For instance, a football match or series is organized by a sports company to promote their products. This will provide youngsters and players to avail and use the products and provide helpful reviews that will ensure free and appropriate promotion of their products. Moreover, this will help with appreciation of values and stocks owned by the company and will definitely increase the interest and consumer base for the organization. I would like to conclude this essay by highlighting a certain set of rules that can be built by an organization to regulate and ensure the participation of young employee bases and people from local communities.

Sample 19:

Many believe that substantial businesses should construct sports and communal amenities for the local populace. While I admit that this practice can help promote companies' image, I still mostly disagree with this opinion as this may distract them from their main target and governments should undertake responsibilities of looking after their citizens.

The first reason for my belief is that offering leisure structures and public gathering places to the masses can be a distraction for companies' business activities. This is because their primary goal is to survive in a hyper-competitive global market and any extra social obligations can be exorbitantly expensive. Therefore, this action can decrease their competitiveness and impact their financial stability by diverting resources to irrelevant purposes rather than investing in research and development or in-house training, thus driving them away from their core operations.

Moreover, I also consider that these social responsibilities should be associated with governmental initiatives. In fact, the general public pay tax in hopes of the authorities providing them with improved public welfare. By allocating the state budget to develop sports centres and communal venues, policymakers can be seen as more reliable and promote unity amongst the citizenries.

However, I concede that this can help enterprises enhance their brand awareness. If companies showcase their commitment to the physical and mental well-being of the public, they can gain more support. Therefore, this can somehow increase the profit since businesses can attract more loyal customers that align with companies' sets of values, increasing their market share.

In conclusion, I somewhat believe that companies should not bear the role of developing sports and community infrastructure for society because they might deviate from their main objectives and governments are responsible for such construction. However, I acknowledge that this can assist corporations in articulating a positive organisational image to consumers. Where possible, large conglomerates should cooperate with the government to provide beneficial amenities to the population.

Sample 20:

The provision of sports and social amenities by companies for local communities is a topic that sparks debate. I am inclined to support this notion to a certain extent due to various reasons.

On the one hand, offering sports and social facilities can significantly benefit the community. Individuals require venues for physical activities and social interactions. For instance, companies can establish parks or sports centers, which can contribute to the well-being and contentment of the residents. Such initiatives may not only enhance the physical health of the individuals but also foster a sense of community spirit. Furthermore, by demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of the locality, companies can improve their public image, potentially attracting more clientele.

On the contrary, it is essential to acknowledge that not all companies possess the financial capacity to develop such amenities. Smaller enterprises, in particular, may face constraints in terms of financial resources. The construction and upkeep of sports and social facilities entail substantial expenses. Imposing such obligations on small companies could jeopardize their sustainability. Moreover, the responsibility of providing public amenities like parks and sports centers predominantly lies with the government. Governments have access to greater resources and thus are better equipped to ensure the availability of essential facilities for all communities.

In conclusion, although the idea of companies offering sports and social facilities for local communities is appealing, its practicality may be limited. Smaller businesses may lack the financial means to engage in such initiatives, while the primary responsibility for providing these amenities rests with the government. Therefore, while companies contributing to community well-being is beneficial, expecting them to solely shoulder this responsibility may not be feasible in all cases.

Sample 21:

Nowadays, companies are exploring various strategies to promote their brand and products, with one compelling measure being the provision of facilities for local communities. I totally agree with this practice because it not only benefits the residents but also serves the interests of the companies themselves.

Firstly, organizing sports and social events allows community members to engage in enjoyable activities, thereby improving their quality of life. For example, at Google's campus in Mountain View, California, the company hosts diverse sports and social events like the annual Google Soccer Tournament and community fitness classes. These events not only provide fun and engaging activities but also foster a sense of community well-being. As a result, the residents' lives are enhanced, and Google's image as a socially responsible and community-oriented company is strengthened.

Secondly, providing such facilities helps companies reach a broader audience and promote their products. In many countries, companies sponsor public areas such as beaches or parks and, in return, are allowed to advertise in these spaces. For instance, when a sports company organizes a football match and uses its own products, the participants and spectators get to experience these products firsthand. This exposure often leads to increased brand recognition and sales, as players and onlookers are more likely to purchase the products they have tried and enjoyed during the events.

In conclusion, companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for local communities, as it enhances residents' quality of life and offers significant promotional opportunities for the companies.

Sample 22:

Some individuals argue that large corporations should invest in providing sports and social facilities for the local community. Although there are potential benefits to this approach, I firmly believe that it is not the responsibility of big companies.

There are several positive effects if large corporations provide sports and social amenities. Many local areas suffer from a shortage of such facilities, which can be costly to establish. As a result, if large corporations invest in these areas, local residents can benefit significantly, promoting their mental and physical well-being. Moreover, local governments may experience less financial pressure, which can be directed to other essential services. Additionally, corporations can gain benefits from such investments, including brand advertising, contributing positively to the community, and enhancing their corporate image.

However, I disagree that it is the duty of large corporations to fund sports and social facilities. Primarily, these companies have other core responsibilities such as product development and employee training. Diverting funds to community facilities could impose a significant financial burden and impede their primary operational goals. Furthermore, there are numerous other ways for corporations to contribute to the local community, such as creating employment opportunities for local residents or offering work experience programs.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of large corporations investing in social and sports facilities, I personally believe that this should not be considered their responsibility. Instead, their focus should remain on their primary business activities, and there are alternative ways to support the local community.

Sample 1:

Whether people should be held responsible for their own local environment protection by the government has become a topic of discussion. From my point of view, I firmly support this idea for a number of reasons.

First, because human self-discipline is often unreliable, suitable punishments from the government are necessary. To be more specific, if people are left to protect the environment of their own volition, efforts may vary between different communities since having an equal understanding of our habitat’s importance throughout the community is impossible. For example, all tourist attractions nowadays have to impose a fine on those who litter, because once such a rule is not in effect, all sites will be filled with trash left behind by ignorant tourists. In Ha Long Bay, Vietnam, due to a lack of guards, the world-renowned heritage site is blighted with trash floating on the water surface.

Another point is that, through educational efforts, governments holding people accountable for their actions in the local environment can help raise awareness effectively. Most people nowadays have a fear of missing out so once a green lifestyle is advocated strongly, it will soon spread widely. Take the inox straw trend for example, the movement started by a group of environmentalists was picked up by large beverage companies and has now become one of the most profitable businesses the world over. The same effect may not be achieved if the movement was a policy implemented by the government. Furthermore, initiatives can be taken to prompt individuals to make small changes such as reducing the frequency of their travels, which can help reduce the overall carbon footprint.

To sum up, the government making people responsible towards their own environment is indisputable. By means of educational campaigns and suitable punishments, more meaningful changes can be made from the individual's side.

Sample 2:

In recent years, there has been growing debate about who should be responsible for maintaining local environments. While some argue that this duty should fall solely on the government, I largely agree with the view that individuals should also play a significant role in caring for their immediate surroundings.

There are several compelling reasons why citizens should take responsibility for their local environment. Firstly, individuals have a vested interest in the cleanliness and attractiveness of their neighborhoods. By actively participating in local clean-up efforts or beautification projects, people can create a more pleasant living space for themselves and their community. Secondly, when residents take ownership of their environment, it fosters a sense of pride and community spirit. This can lead to stronger social bonds and a more cohesive society. Finally, individual action can often be more efficient and responsive to local needs than government-led initiatives, which may be hampered by bureaucracy or budget constraints.

However, it would be unrealistic to expect citizens to bear the entire burden of environmental care. The government still has a crucial role to play in this arena. For instance, local authorities should provide the necessary infrastructure, such as waste management systems and recycling facilities, to support individual efforts. Additionally, the government should establish and enforce regulations to prevent environmental degradation and pollution. Furthermore, educational programs and awareness campaigns led by governmental bodies can help inform and motivate citizens to take action.

In conclusion, while the government should certainly provide support and guidance, I believe that individuals should indeed be primarily responsible for maintaining their local environment. This approach not only leads to more immediate and tailored results but also cultivates a sense of civic responsibility that can benefit society as a whole. A balanced partnership between citizens and the government is likely to yield the best outcomes for local environments.

Sample 3:

Some would argue that climate change is such a pressing threat that governments should issue mandates to make individuals responsible for protecting the local environment. In my opinion, this might raise environmental awareness, however it is not advisable as other steps are more likely to produce results.

Those who suggest individuals should be compelled to accept responsibility are hoping for a united effort from the general public. The entire reason the Earth faces potential catastrophe is because of over-population and consumer habits. There would be a noticeable improvement if individuals were forced to recycle, clean up litter in their neighborhoods and reduce their carbon footprint by not using private vehicles, single-use plastics, and airplanes. There is the added argument that it is important to instill public duty in the mind of the average person. The government could fix these problems but that would only enable bad behavior from citizens in the same way that an overly permissive parent engenders a spoiled child.

However, the impact from the steps mentioned above would be marginal compared to the regulations governments can enact on various industries. Individuals might not follow the mandates from governments, and they would be extremely difficult to enforce in populous nations that value individual liberty such as India, the United States, and Brazil. If governments instead passed laws related to both small and large businesses, they could combat global and local issues. Companies that contribute to air and water pollution could be severely fined and the businesses that profit the most from mass consumerism could be forced to institute more environmentally friendly policies. These simple reforms would have tremendous impact.

In conclusion, although this policy would help individuals become more active in their communities, it is more important for governments to enact sweeping regulations on corporations. In this way, the most progress will be made.

Sample 4:

Many people think that governments should make people accountable for environmental protection. I totally agree with this idea for some reasons.

On the one hand, some people who are against this idea believe that our small individual actions often seem insignificant compared to official measures. Therefore, individuals can do nothing to look after the environment. However, individual actions can prove more effective than we think. If each avoid driving their own car for short journeys, and take public transportation, walk or cycle instead, the use of fossil fuels and the level of contaminated air will be reduced. Another example is that many people stop using plastic bags as it is a hazardous pollutant of the soil, and they take eco-friendly substitutes such as paper or cloth bags into consideration. These examples show that individuals can play an important role in environmental protection.

To place each individual responsibility to prevent damage to the environment, governments should take some actions. First, the public awareness on benefits of protecting the environment should be raised through advertisements. Otherwise, schools should teach children about small individual actions to save the environment. Secondly, there should be strict legislations which can impose coercive effect on individuals. For example, Singapore is well-known for the healthiest and cleanest environment. This is because the government imposes a severe penalty to fine anyone who does things harmful to the local environment.

In conclusion, when it comes to environmental problems, individual actions are indispensable in the problem-solving process. The idea of making people responsible for environmental protection should be promoted in every country.

Sample 1:

The concept of keeping all the money one earns without contributing to the state through taxation is appealing to some individuals. However, this essay disagrees and will argue that paying taxes is essential for maintaining a well-functioning society and providing critical services to citizens.

One of the primary purposes of taxation is to generate revenue for the state to fund essential public services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These services not only improve the quality of life for citizens but also contribute to a more equitable society by ensuring that everyone has access to basic necessities, regardless of their income level. For example, taxes finance public schools, which provide education for all children, including those from low-income families who might not be able to afford private education. Similarly, taxation supports public healthcare systems, enabling access to medical care for all citizens. In the absence of taxation, these services would likely be underfunded or non-existent, leading to a more significant divide between the rich and the poor and exacerbating social inequality.

Another critical function of taxation is to maintain and improve public infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and public transportation systems. These infrastructure projects not only facilitate the movement of goods and people, promoting economic growth, but also ensure that citizens can access essential services and employment opportunities. Without taxation, the responsibility of maintaining and improving infrastructure would fall on private entities, which may prioritize profit over public welfare. This could lead to the neglect of essential infrastructure projects or the imposition of user fees that would disproportionately affect low-income individuals who rely on public transportation or cannot afford tolls.

In conclusion, while the idea of keeping all the money one earns may be tempting, I completely disagree with this view as it is essential to recognize the crucial role of taxation. Taxes are a necessary part of a functioning society, and their contribution to the state helps to ensure a higher quality of life for all citizens.

Sample 2:

In contemporary society, the notion that individuals should be able to retain all the money they earn and not pay taxes to the state is a subject of considerable debate. While it is understandable that people want to keep their hard-earned income, I would argue that taxes are a necessity in both the smooth functioning of a country and presents significant benefits to the individual citizens.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the rationale behind the belief that people should keep their income. Many individuals work tirelessly to earn their wages and naturally feel a sense of entitlement to their earnings. This is the reason why many people are unwilling to contribute a sizable proportion of their monthly income to the government. For instance, a person might prefer to invest in education or property rather than seeing a significant portion of their salary deducted as tax. This perspective is rooted in a desire for financial autonomy and the freedom to make personal financial decisions.

However, despite these valid concerns, paying taxes presents substantial benefits. Primarily, taxes fund essential public infrastructure and services that individuals rely on daily. Public transportation systems, the electrical grid, healthcare, and education are all financed through tax revenues. Without these contributions, maintaining such facilities and ensuring their continuous improvement would be impossible. For example, the salaries of government staff who maintain public infrastructure are paid through taxes, ensuring the smooth functioning of these essential services.

Furthermore, the economy of a country significantly depends on tax revenues. Taxes are the backbone of a stable and functioning economy, providing the government with the necessary funds to manage economic policies, support public welfare programs, and invest in development projects. This economic stability, in turn, benefits all citizens by fostering an environment where businesses can thrive, job opportunities can expand, and public services can improve. When taxpayers contribute, they are not just aiding the government but also ensuring the long-term prosperity and stability of their own country.

In conclusion, while the argument for retaining personal income and avoiding taxes is understandable, the broader benefits of tax contributions cannot be overlooked. Taxes are crucial for funding public infrastructure and services and maintaining a stable economy. Therefore, I would reiterate that taxing a proportion of people's income would introduce more benefits in the long run.

Sample 3:

Many are of the opinion that they should keep all their earnings and not have any obligation to pay taxes to the government. I am in disagreement with this notion.

Opponents of paying taxes point out that they do not have trust in local authorities. Undoubtedly, the funds collected from common citizens should be used for public services. In a large number of countries today where corruption and bribery are rampant, however, the federal budget is misappropriated for the personal gains of those in power. Another reason why people are hesitant to part with their money is the high tax rates combined with an unfair tax structure. For instance, the British public is now furious that while they are working hard and paying their fair share, big corporations are cheating the system to avoid paying theirs. These burdensome factors are likely to propel people toward tax avoidance and non-compliance.

Nonetheless, I am convinced that citizens should make a fair contribution to the common good in order to fund the public goods and services on which they all rely. There is no doubt that taxes are crucial because governments collect this money and use it to finance social projects such as health and education. Some of the money is also channeled to fund projects such as pensions, unemployment benefits, and childcare. Without taxes, it would be impossible for governments to raise money to fund these types of projects and meet the demands of their societies. It is the taxpayers who reap the benefits of this money and thus, citizens should endeavor to make a financial contribution and understand that it is meant to be more than just a "money grab" from the government.

In conclusion, I am of the belief that it is the national duty of every resident to pay a small portion of their income to the government for their own advantage.

Sample 4:

It is sometimes asserted that working people should not be required to pay tax and instead be allowed to use their income as they wish. I largely disagree with this assertion given its impact on social spirit and necessary investment even though the misuse of tax money might be a concern.

The foremost rationale for my disapproval of people being exempted from paying taxes is the rise of selfishness. As this policy allows everyone to keep all of their salaries for themselves without contributing to the national shared budget, it might encourage a selfish attitude which prioritises personal richness over shared responsibilities. If this attitude proliferates, society might suffer from a decreased sense of belonging and connection among its citizens.

Another reason why I am against allowing paid employees to bring home their entire income lies in the necessity of governmental investment. In reality, income tax is one of the most significant financial sources for the national budget, which funds various projects addressing infrastructure, literacy, employment and healthcare. Provided that this source is completely eradicated, these crucial projects might all come to a halt, causing possibly far-reaching repercussions on not only the immediate operation of a country but also its future prosperity.

However, I acknowledge the possibility of taxpayers’ contributions being misused. Those who are in charge of managing national funds might abuse their power for their own benefit. To illustrate, several ministers of the Vietnamese government have been convicted of corruption in recent years with millions of dollars being invested illegally in companies secretly connected to their families. This has undermined the trust of ordinary Vietnamese who regularly contribute to the national budget through the income tax system.

In conclusion, I am mostly against the idea of freeing people from tax responsibilities as it negatively influences social cohesion as well as hinders the execution of social initiatives, despite the risk of corruption. That is why countries should run nation-wide campaigns to educate people on the significance of income tax and implement policies that enhance the transparency and effectiveness of national fund management.

Sample 5:

A group of people think that residents should keep all their earnings and should not have an obligation to pay taxes to the government. I personally disagree with the statement as taxes are useful for the residents and the nation themselves, and the following essay will discuss it in detail.

To begin with, it is a fact that taxes are used by the government for developing its nations. Taxes are allocated for various kinds of essential matters. Firstly, they are used for expanding and maintaining public transportation facilities, such expanding roads and highways, and replacing old public transportation units. Secondly, taxes are utilised for providing decent medical services and basic education for their residents. And last but not least, taxes are also used for funding military services, which is important for maintaining the political stability of a nation.

And then, people should also notice that taxes that they have paid will also be beneficial for themselves sooner or later. Some of the funds that have been collected by tax authorities are used for retirement funds. It means that in the end people will enjoy and benefit some personal facilities from the government, which are funded from taxes. Therefore, people should not keep their earnings to themselves, and they should comply in paying their tax duties and obligations.  

In conclusion, I do not agree if we should keep all our income and not pay any taxes to the government, as taxes are beneficial for the development of the people and the nation itself.

Sample 6:

Whether people should pay tax to the government or not is an argument of great debate. Some people think that it is government's responsibility to raise money from other sectors and should not take the portion of a person's hard earning cash while others stand just opposite of this opinion. I believe if the government spend the money for the benefit of the citizen, as it meant to be for every country, and value the mass people's opinions and suggestions how to best use the money, then there is nothing wrong with the tax paying method and rather had many positive reasons to do so.

Those who are against the tax paying system often opine that the government should never take their hard earning money for the sake of country's development scheme. This is especially true for those who earn an amount that barely supports his/her family and who are not satisfied with the public service provided by the government. In many countries, people have to pay a tax of more than a quarter of the total earning of a year and yet do not get basic facilities like treatment, education and they have to spend their own pocket money for those purposes. This is very natural that they become angry about the tax paying.

But tax collected from the people of a country can be a great fund to use for their betterment by the government. There are lots of poor people who can benefit from the tax paid by the others. The government can build more roads, offer public services, and can introduce other useful schemes using the money. Almost in most of the countries, people who earn more than a predefined amount have to pay tax and not for those who earn less than that amount. So, the government is not forcing poor people to pay tax but those who are able to pay tax.     

Sample 7:

The idea that individuals should be allowed to keep all the money they earn and not be required to pay taxes to the state has gained traction among some people. While this perspective might seem appealing at first glance, I believe that taxes are essential for the functioning of society and the overall well-being of its citizens. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why taxes are necessary and why the idea of not paying taxes could be detrimental to both individuals and society as a whole.

On the one hand, some people argue that they should be able to keep all the money they earn because they believe that their hard work should be rewarded without interference from the government. They claim that taxes reduce the incentive to work hard and that individuals should have the freedom to decide how to spend their money. For example, if people were not required to pay taxes, they might be more motivated to work harder, knowing that they could enjoy the full benefits of their labor. Moreover, some people argue that they can manage their finances better than the government and that they would prefer to invest their money in ways that directly benefit themselves and their families rather than contributing to public funds.

However, the idea of abolishing taxes is impractical and could lead to significant problems for society. Taxes are the primary source of revenue for governments, enabling them to provide essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and national defense. Without taxes, these services would be severely underfunded, leading to a decline in the quality of life for all citizens. For instance, roads, public schools, and hospitals would not be adequately maintained, and this would negatively impact everyone, including those who argue against paying taxes. Additionally, taxes help to reduce income inequality by redistributing wealth and providing social safety nets for the less fortunate. Without taxes, the gap between the rich and the poor would widen, leading to social unrest and instability.

In conclusion, while the idea of keeping all the money one earns may seem appealing, it is not a viable option for a functioning society. Taxes are essential for funding public services, maintaining infrastructure, and ensuring social stability. Therefore, I believe that paying taxes is a necessary responsibility for all citizens, and the benefits of taxation far outweigh the drawbacks.

Sample 8:

There is an ongoing debate about whether individuals should be allowed to keep all their earnings without paying taxes to the government. While it is understandable why some people may feel entitled to retain their full income, I strongly believe that taxation is crucial for the functioning of a well-balanced society. In this essay, I will explain why paying taxes is not only a civic duty but also essential for societal development.

Those who support the idea of not paying taxes argue that individuals have earned their money through hard work and should have full control over their income. They believe that taxation is an unjust practice that punishes success and discourages productivity. For instance, without taxes, people might be more inclined to pursue entrepreneurship or invest in personal development, knowing they would fully reap the benefits of their labor. This perspective suggests that eliminating taxes could lead to a more dynamic and prosperous economy.

A society without taxes would have negative and far-reaching effects, nevertheless. Taxes fund essential public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, which are the backbone of any civilized society. Without taxes, the government would be unable to maintain these services, leading to a decline in the quality of life for all citizens. For example, without tax revenue, public schools would be underfunded, resulting in lower educational standards and reduced opportunities for the next generation. Furthermore, taxes help to ensure social equity by redistributing wealth and providing safety nets for the vulnerable, which are necessary to prevent social unrest and maintain stability.

In conclusion, while the notion of keeping all earned income may seem appealing, it is impractical and would ultimately harm society. Taxes are indispensable for funding public services, ensuring social equity, and maintaining a stable economy. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the idea that individuals should not pay taxes, as the benefits of a well-functioning tax system far outweigh any perceived disadvantages.

Sample 9:

The debate over whether individuals should retain all their earnings without being taxed has long been a controversial topic. While some argue that taxes infringe upon personal freedoms, I believe that taxation is vital for maintaining societal harmony and supporting the collective good. This essay will explore the reasons why taxes are necessary and why abolishing them would be detrimental to society as a whole.

Proponents of a tax-free society often argue that taxes are a form of government overreach, limiting individual freedom and discouraging personal success. They claim that by keeping all their income, individuals could have greater financial freedom to invest in their own lives, businesses, and communities. For example, with no taxes, people could potentially invest more in their children’s education, their healthcare, or even local charities, leading to a more prosperous and self-sufficient society. This view holds that without the burden of taxes, economic growth and personal well-being could flourish.

Nevertheless, the idea of a society without taxes is both unrealistic and unsustainable. Taxes are essential for funding public goods and services that benefit everyone, including those who might prefer not to pay for them. For instance, taxes are used to build and maintain infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and public transportation, which are crucial for economic activity and daily life. Additionally, taxes support essential services like emergency response, law enforcement, and social welfare programs, which protect and enhance the lives of all citizens. The absence of taxes would lead to the collapse of these critical systems, resulting in a lower quality of life and increased inequality.

In summary, while the concept of retaining all earned income may initially seem appealing, it would ultimately lead to a less equitable and functional society. The infrastructure and services necessary to maintain a stable and flourishing society are mostly financed by taxes. Therefore, I firmly believe that paying taxes is not only a civic responsibility but also a necessary contribution to the well-being of society as a whole.

Sample 10:

Collecting taxes dates back to ancient civilizations, yet some people claim that the money they have earned should be kept to themselves rather than turned to taxes to the nation. From my perspective, this idea fails to recognize the role of taxation, and I disagree with it.

First, taxation is the key to financing public services and infrastructure that constitute the basic needs of individuals, such as healthcare and transport. For instance, public education is a cornerstone of societal development and economic progress, but without sufficient funding, the quality of education would decline, leading to a less competitive workforce. Therefore, if people refuse to pay taxes and shoulder the collective responsibility, a country cannot function properly and support the overall well-being of the populace.

Secondly, taxation serves the purpose of wealth redistribution. The tax-free system could exacerbate income inequality as the wealthy could accumulate more wealth. The absence of tax revenue means governments cannot establish social safety networks or social welfare programs to support and assist the less fortunate groups of people, leading to further income gaps and social inequality in many aspects. In this situation, social instability and turmoil are likely to occur.

I understand the advocates’ argument that individuals have the freedom to keep their wealth in their hands because this represents the fruit of their labor and efforts, while paying tax infringes on their property rights. This is plausible because it neglects the essence of the relationship between citizens and governments. Individuals’ freedom and well-being are reliant on the functioning of society. Without governments and adequate funding, keeping their wealth is like a castle in the air.

In conclusion, while individuals’ rights matter, the idea of not paying tax is ungrounded and unjustifiable when we consider the role of taxation in individual well-being and society’s stability and development.

Sample 11:

Some people argue that they should be entitled to retain all the money they earn without paying taxes to the state. However, I totally disagree with this view.

Firstly, taxes are essential for funding public goods and services that benefit everyone in society. Without taxes, the government would be unable to provide critical services such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public safety. For example, public hospitals and schools rely heavily on tax revenue to operate and maintain their services. If individuals kept all their earnings, these vital services would suffer, leading to a decline in the overall quality of life. Therefore, taxes are a necessary contribution to the common good, ensuring that essential services are available to all citizens.

Secondly, taxes play a crucial role in reducing income inequality and promoting social equity. Through a progressive tax system, where higher earners pay a larger percentage of their income, the government can redistribute wealth and provide support to the less fortunate. This helps to create a more balanced and fair society. For instance, social welfare programs and unemployment benefits, funded by taxes, offer a safety net for those in need. By contributing to these programs, individuals help to create a more just and equitable society. Thus, paying taxes is a way to ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities and opportunities for a better life.

In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the notion that people should keep all the money they earn and not pay taxes since taxes are indispensable for funding public services and reducing income inequality. Hence, ensuring a well-functioning society requires that everyone contributes their fair share through taxation.

Sample 12:

It is believed that individuals should have the freedom to retain all of their income instead of allocating it to taxation. This essay will challenge this school of thought.

Granted, those who believe that it is justified to keep their hard-earned money rather than contribute to the tax system have their own standpoint. They may argue that the money is what they deserve after long hours of hard work while the state does not directly assist them with their work. However, this line of reasoning overlooks the benefits, amenities, and conveniences they enjoy daily, which largely come from tax revenues. For instance, the public transport system enables many people to commute to work quickly and conveniently with various choices from buses to subways at an economical toll, funded by the state budget.

From my perspective, contributing to the tax system should be viewed as a way to collectively develop a country and enhance living standards. Indeed, tax money serves the public in various fields, including education, transportation, healthcare, and national defense. For example, in Denmark, one of the countries with the highest tax rate per individual, citizens are still pleased to pay taxes annually because they enjoy free education, advanced hospitals, and swift, clean public transport, all of which contribute to their overall satisfaction and well-being. In extreme cases such as wars and conflicts, a country without a national budget, or tax revenue, would find it virtually impossible to protect itself as there would be no allocation for the army or weapons. This is why I believe that individuals should not be selfish and should contribute part of their income to paying taxes.

In conclusion, I totally disagree with those who believe they should keep all of their earnings rather than paying taxes, given all the benefits they enjoy that are funded by the tax budget.

Sample 13:

People work hard and earn money which ideally they would like to retain for themselves. However, a significant portion of this usually has to be given to the state. In my view, it is right that people pay their fair share of taxes. 

Money is everything in today’s world. This is because money is used to buy all the necessities such as food, water, and shelter. Money is also used to help a family’s children in the form of school fees and other activities. In addition to this, people do not only need money to cater for their necessities, but also for future investments. The more that people have to invest, the more they believe they can accumulate in the long term. As a result, many are reluctant to lose some of their income through the deduction of tax. 

Nevertheless, citizens should be obliged to pay taxes to the government for a number of reasons. They should accept that the taxes they pay help the government offer them public services all over the country. These public services are things such as the construction of roads, bridges, public hospitals, parks and other public services. The same tax money helps the country’s economy to be stable. Through taxes, the government can also pay off its debts. In short, money received through taxes is a way of ensuring that people have comfortable livelihoods.

In conclusion, even though many people think that they should not pay taxes, that money is useful to the stability of any country. Therefore, people should not avoid paying taxes as it may affect the country’s economy and the services that it provides. 

Sample 14:

Paying taxes is required by law and regarded as a civic duty in most nations. However, there are drawbacks that make some individuals or businesses attempt to evade or deduct the tax they must pay. Some people argue that taxation is unfair and that they should be allowed to keep all of their legitimate income because they fight for it every minute. In this essay, we will discuss both the views with reasons and justification.

In addition to reducing individual workers' motivation, high taxes have the potential to penalize hard work. However, the situation that is more concerning is that with all of the money paid by taxpayers, the government also could misuse or even become corrupt. In this instance, it is preferable for them to keep the money for themselves rather than anyone else. It is a legitimate claim that I am earning money by working hard and it is my right to keep it. Hence, the people who have this view cannot be blamed. They really work hard to make ends meet and support their family. Even 1% of their income is huge for them. In that case, paying 10% taxes is not justified.

On the other hand, people argue that taxes are a crucial source of revenue for the government and the country. They are in charge of building a strong nation and providing essential public services. The services include education, healthcare, the police, and many others that are crucial to the well-being of every citizen. The government also needs money to run the government. If there were no taxpayers, there would be no money to pay government employees. Without this revenue, there would be no organization to run the country, which would probably jeopardize national security. As a result, each and every taxpayer should be responsible for paying their taxes.

I believe that citizens who are able to pay taxes should pay their taxes to the government. They should provide our government with the resources it needs to protect our nation as a whole and improve our personal quality of life. However, these resources must be properly utilized and cannot be abused by incompetent officials.

Sample 15:

Some people argue that the government shouldn't tax people because they should use all of their earnings for their own needs. I disagree with this idea because taxation is a means by which the government provides essential services and infrastructures. This ensures equality in many societies.

Equality is one of the primary advantages of taxation. This means that there is a tax bracket for each genre of people and income. To put it another way, people in many nations pay taxes in proportion to their earnings. As a result, people with higher incomes pay more taxes to the government, while seniors and people with lower incomes, with a few exceptions, pay less. Luxury goods, for example, are subject to a high tax in many nations, but individuals who do not have a regular income are exempt from certain taxes. As a result, society has become more equitable. Let us take the example of working professionals. In India, the government has allowed no tax for people earning below 2.5 lakhs. There is a certain amount they need to pay if they earn 2.5 to 5 lakhs. The person earning above 5 lakhs needs to pay 20% of the total income that is more than Rs.5 lakh. Hence, it becomes easier for lower income people to pay less or no taxes.

In addition, infrastructure development and the provision of essential services necessitate taxes. This is because the majority of governments use tax revenue to pay for these public services and infrastructures. For instance, the tax revenue that the government receives is used to pay for social services, health care, and security in many nations. Therefore, the government would not be able to develop public infrastructure or pay for essential services if it did not receive tax revenue.

In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that individuals should pay tax rather than keep their income. Taxation is the primary means by which governments fund public services and infrastructures and ensures equanimity in many nations. The promotion of these qualities should be encouraged.

Sample 1:

The pressing matter of global environmental sustainability has ignited debates on the necessity for immediate international action to slash the consumption of fossil fuels. This discourse emphasizes the critical role of collective efforts in confronting climate change.

One viewpoint emphasizes the urgent need for global cooperation to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. In Vietnam, the ramifications of climate change are already evident, with the Mekong Delta experiencing severe soil salinization due to rising sea levels - a direct consequence of global warming. This situation, if not addressed promptly by international consensus, could escalate, leading to irreversible damage. While some argue that developing nations may struggle with the swift transition to renewable energy sources, advancements in technology have seen solar and wind energy becoming more viable, as demonstrated by Vietnam's strides in solar power, highlighting the potential for a global shift towards greener energy sources.

However, I believe that the responsibility for mitigating fossil fuel consumption should not be placed entirely in international directives. Nations must harness their unique socio-economic landscapes to devise and implement tailored strategies for energy transition. Vietnam's emergence as a leader in solar energy within Southeast Asia exemplifies how localized initiatives can significantly contribute to the broader goal of environmental conservation, underscoring the potential of national efforts in the global fight against climate change.

In conclusion, the call for immediate international action to curtail fossil fuel usage is undeniably justified, given the stark implications of climate change across the globe. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge the pivotal role that individual countries play in this endeavor. By blending global cooperation with localized action, we can forge a sustainable path forward, ensuring a healthier planet for future generations.

Sample 2:

The urgent need to reduce fossil fuel consumption has become an imperative echoed worldwide. In the face of escalating climate change, there is a compelling argument for the international community to take immediate and decisive action. This essay explores the pressing reasons why global collaboration is essential in curbing fossil fuel consumption.

One of the paramount reasons for global intervention lies in the dire environmental consequences of unabated fossil fuel use. Climate change, fueled by greenhouse gas emissions, has resulted in devastating phenomena such as extreme weather patterns and rising sea levels. These effects pose existential threats to both humanity and the natural world. Therefore, rapid international action is not just advantageous; it is a moral obligation to preserve Earth's delicate ecosystems.

Furthermore, the reduction of fossil fuel consumption is integral to stimulating innovation and fostering sustainability. Embracing renewable energy sources not only reduces pollution but also fuels technological advancements. Nations investing in clean energy infrastructure are at the forefront of the green revolution, creating jobs, stimulating economic growth, and nurturing a culture of environmental stewardship. This shift minimizes our carbon footprint, propelling the transition towards a more sustainable global economy.

In conclusion, addressing fossil fuel consumption is a defining challenge of our time, requiring resolute global action. By diminishing our reliance on fossil fuels swiftly, we not only mitigate environmental degradation but also usher in an era of innovation, economic prosperity, and sustainable development. Through collaborative efforts, the international community can pave the way for a greener, more equitable future.

Sample 3:

The global concern regarding fossil fuel consumption has prompted the international community to call for immediate action, urging all nations to reduce their reliance on these resources. I firmly agree with this stance, given the substantial increase in global warming attributed to the use of fossil fuels such as gas and oil.

Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide, trapping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere and causing a rise in global temperatures. This, in turn, leads to various environmental issues, such as the melting of glaciers, rising sea levels, and extreme weather conditions, emphasizing the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption. Additionally, it is vital to acknowledge that fossil fuels are non-renewable resources. Therefore, the imperative is to actively diminish their use to safeguard the planet’s future.

Given the heavy reliance of many economies on fossil fuels, an abrupt reduction in consumption may initially seem impracticable and pose significant challenges. However, recognizing that our fossil fuel reserves may be exhausted within a few centuries underscores the urgency of transitioning towards more sustainable forms of energy. To address this dilemma, actions to reduce fossil fuel consumption must be implemented gradually, allowing economies to adapt and transition smoothly. By investing in renewable energy sources, implementing energy-efficient technologies, and fostering innovation, nations can proactively navigate the shift away from fossil fuels before these finite resources are fully depleted. This strategic approach is essential to ensure a sustainable and resilient future for both our economies and the planet.

In conclusion, the global community must urgently take action to reduce reliance on fossil fuels across all countries. Despite the challenges, this transition is necessary for the sustainability of the planet and the survival of future generations. While the shift may be challenging, the consequences of inaction are far more significant. Therefore, there exists a collective responsibility to diminish fossil fuel consumption and move towards a more sustainable future.

Sample 4:

Increasing consumption of fossil fuels has resulted in the emission of greenhouse gases which are one of the causes of issues relating to environmental damage in recent years. Therefore, some people suggest that all countries should take actions urgently to lessen the usage of harmful energy. From my personal view, I agree with the statement to some extent.

First of all, it cannot be denied that fossil fuels are one of the major contributors to global warming and climate change. Indeed, the burning of oil and coal produces tonnes of carbon dioxide per year, and it is one of the greenhouse gases that enhance radioactive forcing and contribute to global warming. The rise in temperature of the Earth has been associated with numerous adverse effects such as melting of polar ice caps, flooding of low-lying areas and rise to the sea level.

Secondly, fossil fuels are generally considered to be non-renewable resources because they take millions of years to form. If the utilisation of mineral fuels is not reduced and controlled, it could be exhausted, and people may soon run short of fossil fuels while scientists have not found an alternative energy source. As a result, the price of fossil fuels has also increased greatly which could lead countries to fall into a fuel war.

However, there might be some concerns about the reduction of mineral fuels utilisation. One among of them is that the approach will lead to failure to maintain a well-balanced social order. In fact, manufacture industry, transportation and even home heating require powers, which are generated through fossil fuels. Accordingly, detrimental consequences might impact the development of the entire world if we cut down the use of fossil fuel immediately. More than that, some alternative powers such as nuclear, solar and wind power have not been applied widely due to reasons like climate condition, high cost or safety requirement. It could take scientists many years developing these energies to be perfect substitutes for fossil fuel.

In conclusion, in order to tackle environmental problems and avoid the growing scarcity of natural energy in the future, the reduction in the consumption of fossil fuels should be considered and planned purposefully and gradually.

Sample 5:

In the face of escalating environmental challenges, it is not only imperative but also indispensable for the international community to take immediate action to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. I firmly believe that such actions are necessary for the long-term sustainability of our planet.

The proliferation of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the burning of fossil fuels has led to various environmental problems, with global warming and resource depletion being chief among them. The advance of industrial progress, characterised by the widespread use of manufacturing technologies dependent on fossil fuels, worsens these existential threats. For instance, the adoption of car manufacturing techniques has caused a surge in vehicular emissions, further aggravating environmental degradation. To address these negative impacts and ensure a sustainable future, concerted efforts among nations are essential. By collectively transitioning towards alternative fuel sources like hydrogen or electricity, nations can reduce the dependence on fossil fuels and pave the way for environmental sustainability.

While the increasing popularity of electric vehicles (EVs) signals a potential shift away from traditional combustion engines, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of current battery technologies. Despite their claimed environmental benefits, the environmental costs associated with the production and disposal of lithium-ion batteries highlight the need for a more comprehensive and sustainable approach to transportation. For example, the dominance of EVs in countries like China emphasises the urgency of developing alternative propulsion technologies that overcome the limitations of conventional batteries. Through collaborative research and development initiatives, nations can expedite the transition towards sustainable transportation solutions like hydrogen-powered engines, thus mitigating the adverse environmental impacts of fossil fuel consumption.

In conclusion, the need to reduce global reliance on fossil fuels is undeniable, requiring immediate action from the international community. By fostering collaborative partnerships and embracing sustainable technologies, nations can mitigate the adverse impacts of fossil fuel consumption and steer towards a more prosperous and sustainable future. Therefore, I believe that while transitioning away from fossil fuels may pose significant challenges, the undeniable imperative to protect our planet compels us to take decisive action collectively in pursuit of a more sustainable future.

Sample 6:

Reducing fossil fuels like gas and oil is alarming, encouraging communities across all nations to respond and provide alternatives to decrease their usage. I strongly agree with this notion, as I believe that excessive fossil fuel harms the environment and one’s health.

On the one hand, I would argue that all countries must pay attention to the people’s consumption of non-renewable energy such as coal, oil and gasoline since it is detrimental to the environment. Once gas is burnt, it produces a toxic substance, carbon dioxide, which is one of the factors causing climate change. The weather today, as we know it, has become highly unpredictable, resulting in many unprecedented natural disasters that affect everyone of all races living on Earth.

Another factor that the national government should do in order to utilise fossil fuels is that high authorities must encourage people to shift towards electric vehicles. Cars, buses, and trains share a large proportion of non-renewable energy. Apart from this, they are the primary cause of air pollution that harms people’s health. Additionally, the depletion of natural resources. In Saudi Arabia, for instance, by 2025, it was predicted that gasoline and oil production would diminish, and the country would no longer be capable of exporting. Hence, changing to electric vehicles would eliminate the need to use our natural resources, and these acts will prevent depletion and illnesses.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that all nations should act together to prevent the future depletion of fossil fuels by using electric vehicles as alternatives, while the decrease in the use of gasoline and oils will significantly lower the toxic gas emitted into the air.

Sample 7:

Yes I strongly agree with the statement that it is essential for the international community to act immediately to regulate the consumption of fossil fuels. Because the usage of fossil fuel is very high nowadays. It is the duty of the government to educate the citizens about the pros and cons of using fossil fuels. 

It is because people should know the causes of burning fossil fuels. It can release toxic gases: carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide that create air pollution which harms our health. And it generates toxic emissions that drive climate change. Furthermore, the serious issues of consumption of fossil fuel have led to early death, heart attacks, respiratory disorders, stroke, asthma and absenteeism at school and work. It has also been linked to autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimer’s disease. 

According to the report fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas have been powering our economies for over 150 years, and now they supply about 80% of the world’s energy. Especially after industrial development has increased worldwide to enhance the economy of the country, the consumption of fossil fuels has also increased rapidly. Also a new modeling study has mentioned that the use of fossil fuels in industry, power generation, and transportation, accounts for 5.1 million avoidable deaths a year globally. 

To sum up, I think that the gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuel to zero will aid in reducing deaths, and illness from air pollution, limit climate change and strengthen energy in the near future.

Sample 8:

In this modern era, the usage of fossil fuel is very high, they are burnt to generate energy that can be used for direct heating in cooking purposes, for power engines like motor engines or internal combustion engines. The international community should take some measures to reduce the usage of fossil fuel to create a better atmosphere. In this essay, I am going to explain my opinion about it.

Fossil fuels are an integral part of the global economy, with significant economic importance. On the other hand, the usage of fossil fuel has affected the world economy. The economic costs of air pollution from fossil fuels are estimated at US$2.9 trillion in 2018, or 3.3% of global GDP.

In addition, approximately over a million people died in 2018 due to exposure to air pollution caused by fossil fuel. Furthermore, the effects of using fossil fuel outweigh the benefits we derive from them. For instance, the widespread use of fossil fuels in our daily life has led to an era of global warming and ozone layer depletion. 

In conclusion, to avoid these effects the international community should take measures to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels like switching the alternative sources such as solar energy in the forms of solar heater, solar cookers, use of natural gas and wind energy are some ways to reduce the usage of fossil fuel. And we can also use public transport, try carpooling and use bicycles for short distances.

Sample 9:

The world is facing a critical challenge due to the increasing consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. Therefore, many people believe it is imperative for the global community to take prompt action in order to ensure that all countries decrease their consumption of fossil fuels, and I completely agree with this suggestion.

Firstly, reducing the consumption of fossil fuels will not only mitigate the adverse effects of climate change but also lead to a more sustainable future. The use of renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydropower can be harnessed to provide sustainable energy for future generations. For instance, some cities have implemented various measures to reduce their carbon footprint, such as promoting cycling, investing in renewable energy sources, and implementing a district heating system that uses waste heat from power plants to heat buildings. As a result, these cities have reduced their carbon emissions significantly.

Secondly, reducing the consumption of fossil fuels will have a significant impact on public health. Fossil fuels have been linked to air pollution and other health issues. By reducing the consumption of fossil fuels, the international community can create a safer and healthier environment for all. To illustrate, in recent years, China has made significant efforts to reduce its reliance on coal, the most polluting fossil fuel, and has implemented various measures to improve air quality. As a result, the air quality in many cities in China has improved significantly, and the number of premature deaths due to air pollution has decreased.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly agree that the international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels. It's a global responsibility to adopt sustainable energy sources and reduce our dependence on finite resources.

Sample 10:

On a dangerous ongoing range of environmental problems, the cross-national community must act instantly to ensure all nations decrease their use of fossil fuels. I completely disagree with this practice based on its infeasibility and its consequences for countries.

My first justification is that forcing all countries to immediately reduce their reliance on fossil fuels would be nearly unfeasible. Each nation operates under its own regulations and industry development plans, making enforcing such measures impossible for the international community. Attempting to do so could be seen as a violation of national sovereignty, leading to diplomatic tensions and conflicts among governments and nations involved in the production and trade of these resources. The Paris Agreement, which serves as a prime example of these difficulties, outlines a gradual reduction of the target over decades by changing to greener alternative resources but is unable to reach an agreement due to the differences in nations’ economic backgrounds and interests in importing and exporting fossil fuels. This example highlights that the interventions and effectors of the international community would not be effectively carried out on a global scale.

Another point is that this approach might have detrimental consequences for countries. Firstly, being independent of fossil fuels can bring significant economic drawbacks. It would require extensive campaigns involving politicians, business leaders, and civil society to mobilize people and promote the use of alternative resources. These endeavors require substantial investments and may strain other resources such as electricity, solar, or wind power, thus leading to energy resource exploitation, which can cause nationwide blackouts and disrupt economic activities. Additionally, abruptly reducing fossil fuel use by citizens could negatively impact their daily commute and result in job losses in sectors dependent on fossil fuels, potentially lowering overall living standards and leading to a rise in the crime rate, creating social chaos. This future proves that this approach may lead to significant social problems.

In conclusion, I entirely disagree with the practice of forcing all nations to cut their dependence on fossil fuels immediately due to its impossible and significant consequences for the economy and society. Therefore, efforts in this regard should be implemented in a more sustainable manner.

Sample 11:

It is argued that immediate international effort should be made to reduce the amount of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil, being consumed by different countries of the world. Personally, I totally agree with this statement in terms of the conservation of the environment and the settlement of conflicts between nations.

The reduced use of fossil fuels contributes to the protection of the environment. Burning gas and oil for various purposes is widely known to result in the production of a range of toxic chemicals, such as carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide, the emission of which seriously damages the air quality. Meanwhile, oil spills that happen every now and then are responsible for marine pollution. If there is a decrease in the quantity of fossil fuels used, the likelihood of environmental degradation can be reduced.

In addition, international conflicts can be avoided if the demand for fossil fuels is reduced significantly. It is a fact that the outbreak of wars in some Middle East countries is because they are rich in oil. Some developed countries, in order to grab the resources, declare wars, fighting for what they want. However, when it comes to the time when alternative energy is ready, fossil fuels will no longer be treasured, and thus, the importance of them declines. As a consequence, wars will stop, and people can live a peaceful life.

In conclusion, I am completely in favour of the necessity of adopting measures immediately to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels worldwide. After all, when this happens, the environment can be protected well and there is less possibility of the breakout of wars.

Sample 12:

Growing consumptions of fossil fuels have led to the emission of greenhouse gas that’s among the source of environmental damage lately. Therefore, today, some people imply that all nations should take action desperately to lower the use of negative energy. From my view, I concur with the statement to some degree.

The burning of coal and oil generates tonnes of carbon dioxide each year, and it’s among the greenhouse gases which improve radioactive driving and contribute to global warming.

If mineral fuel utilization isn’t controlled and reduced, it might be drained, and individuals may soon run tons of fossil fuels. At the same time, scientists haven’t discovered an alternate energy supply. Thus, the purchase price of fossil fuels has also improved considerably, leading nations to fall into gas warfare.

But there could be some concerns about the decrease in mineral fuel utilization. Among them is the strategy will cause failure to keep well-balanced societal order. In reality, manufacturing business, transport, and house heating demand forces, which can be generated via fossil fuels. Therefore, harmful consequences might impact the evolution of the whole world when we instantly reduce fossil fuel usage. Over that, some other forces like solar, nuclear, and wind power have yet to be implemented widely because of reasons like climate illness, higher price, or security requirements. It might take scientists several years to create these energies to be perfect replacements for fossil fuel.

In summary, to tackle environmental issues and steer clear of the growing shortage of pure energy in the long run, the decrease in fossil fuel usage should be contemplated and intended intentionally and slowly.

Sample 13:

Climate change is at the forefront of international debates and is driving political discourse. Many environmentalists argue that the global community has to act at once to make sure that all nations decrease their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas, coal and oil, as global warming is in full swing. In this case, I completely agree with the argument.

The reason why the onus is now on the international community is that states alone cannot solve the issue. This is because the pollution of a country impacts the atmosphere of other countries in one way or another. China’s coal-powered plants, for example, depletes the ozone layer over the other nations, this, in turn, affects the whole world. Similarly, India is manufacturing huge amounts of plastic from crude oil. Exhaust fumes from the burning crude oil trap the heat in the atmosphere accordingly. Thus, no single country can reduce global warming independently.

Besides, our epoch appears to have reached a point where all nations compete with one another so as to manufacture goods at a cheaper cost. Since fossil fuels are still significantly cheaper than alternative forms of energy, no individual state alone takes the initiative to reduce fossil fuel consumption in fear of losing a competitive advantage over others. So, at this level, a few countries reducing carbon footprint dramatically cannot bring about the desired effect on a global scale if major emitters, such as China, India, USA, Japan, and Russia, do not convene to undertake joint action. Thus, the prerequisite for reducing fossil fuel consumption is the willingness of the global community to convince individual nations to adopt a green policy.

In conclusion, an individual nation’s pollution affects the world, and most countries consider their economic interests more important than their carbon emission. That is why the international community has to enforce minimal use of fossil fuel immediately to save the planet. This will only be effective if all nations come together to take coherent actions.

Sample 1:

The trend of international cooperation has opened up a host of opportunities for developments. While some argue that these advantages are mostly in environmental protection, others claim that businesses will benefit most. From my perspective, both sides are correct, as international cooperation can simultaneously do good to the two mentioned sectors.

On the one hand, joint efforts from all nations can have positive effects on the environment. First, as many environmental crimes are operated cross-border, governments must collaborate to detect and deplete these activities. By way of illustration, illegal logging in Southeast Asia spans across the lands of Brunei, Laos, Indonesia, et cetera. Each country accounts for a part in the illegal wood supply chain. Therefore, Southeast Asian nations should cooperate to destroy the illegal timber production line, as a country’s lone effort would only result in the contemporary eradication of a mere portion of the chain. Secondly, international cooperation allows countries to learn from each other and create optimal solutions to similar problems. Nations with matching backgrounds can use each other’s campaigns as case studies and apply them accordingly to their respective countries, resulting in better effectiveness.

On the other hand, the world economy will gain considerable advantages through multinational cooperation. Thanks to globalization, many businesses are having subsidiaries worldwide, creating numerous job opportunities for the locals. For example, various underdeveloped areas are receiving a boost in economic growth due to international companies constructing their offshore headquarters there. Hai Phong in Vietnam, where Samsung built their subsidiary office, is an exemplary example as the province has welcomed an increasing number of laborers. Additionally, multinational conglomerates can enjoy attractive economic incentives from foreign nations, thus helping them save additional costs on tax and more. In Vietnam, Lego enjoyed feed-in tariffs, tax exemptions, and investment subsidies for building their first carbon neutral plant in the country.

In conclusion, international cooperation is a positive trend for both the economy and the environment and therefore should be encouraged.

Sample 2:

It is sometimes asserted that cross-border partnerships mostly benefit environmental conservation, whereas opponents believe that their focus is on global trade. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and the reasons why I lean toward the latter idea.

On the one hand, cooperation between nations can be greatly beneficial to the protection of the Earth for several reasons. Chief among these is the possibility of globally binding environmental commitments. An illustrative example of this is the Paris Accord, which mandates over 100 nations to not only increase investment in renewable energy but also reduce carbon dioxide emissions to bring the world temperature closer to its pre-industrial level. In addition, the international community can provide significant funding to environmental programs. These funds allow for the establishment, execution, and continuation of ambitious projects that address climate change. For instance, the World Bank allocates millions of dollars annually to initiatives that monitor climatic shifts, protect wildlife and prevent deforestation around the globe.

On the other hand, some maintain that the prime focus of cross-border collaboration is on international commerce. The foremost explanation is the facilitated flow of commodities. To illustrate, tons of high-quality durians grown in Vietnam have been exported to China since both countries agreed on cutting export tariffs and procedures. Additionally, partnerships between nations have enabled the more efficient manufacture of various products. Although the Boeing airplane is assembled in America, the vast majority of its components are imported from other nations. If the tie between the USA and these countries were suddenly interrupted, the production of Boeing’s planes, and possibly many other commodities, would be severely disrupted.

In conclusion, both perspectives have their own merits. However, I am of the opinion that trade is the main target of international collaboration, as it fosters the transactions of commodities as well as their production. Governments, therefore, should work more on eliminating trade barriers and use the increased wealth to sponsor environmental protection programs.

Sample 3:

International cooperation is often perceived as having primary benefits in either environmental protection or the sphere of business. Personally, I firmly believe that the chief advantage lies in the safeguarding of our environment.

On the one hand, some argue that the principal advantage of international cooperation is in the business domain. By establishing trade agreements and economic partnerships, countries can stimulate economic growth and create new opportunities. For example, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has facilitated the flow of goods and services between the US, Canada, and Mexico, boosting the economies of these countries. Furthermore, international cooperation can attract foreign direct investment, driving innovation and creating jobs. This demonstrates that collaboration on a global scale can lead to substantial economic benefits.

However, I side with those who claim that the foremost benefit of international collaboration is the protection of the environment. Global environmental issues such as climate change, deforestation, and pollution necessitate concerted efforts from multiple countries. For instance, the Paris Agreement, a landmark international accord, was established to combat climate change by limiting global warming. This agreement showcases how countries can unite to address a common environmental threat. Through such cooperation, nations can share technology, knowledge, and resources, leading to more effective solutions. Therefore, it is evident that international cooperation significantly contributes to the preservation of the environment.

In conclusion, while international cooperation undoubtedly fosters economic growth and development, I believe its most crucial contribution is in the protection of our environment. By addressing global environmental challenges collectively and sharing resources and knowledge, we can ensure a sustainable future.

Sample 4:

Opinions are divided on whether international cooperation primarily aims to protect the environment or to foster economic development. While there are compelling arguments for both sides, I believe that the key benefit of international cooperation lies in economic progression.

From an environmental perspective, many believe that international cooperation is crucial for environmental protection because collective efforts can lead to significant positive impacts. For instance, over 130 countries have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality, which involves balancing carbon emissions with carbon absorption through carbon sinks. This ambitious goal is indeed beneficial; however, the majority of these countries are currently responsible for over 80% of global carbon dioxide emissions, and only a few have reached net-zero emissions. This indicates that while international efforts are a step in the right direction, they have not yet led to significant environmental changes. Additionally, the lack of feasible initiatives and the myriads of environmental issues faced by individual countries further complicate global efforts.

On the other hand, the economic benefits of international cooperation are more apparent and immediate. Many countries join international organizations to gain economic advantages that promote growth. For example, European countries that joined the European Union benefit from the abolition of border controls, facilitating free movement and enhancing opportunities for work and travel across the continent. This not only boosts tourism but also improves the fluidity of energy, knowledge, and capital markets, ensuring maximum benefits from these resources. Moreover, international cooperation often leads to symbiotic economic relationships, such as tax reliefs on imports and exports, which significantly facilitate foreign trade.

In conclusion, while it is understandable that some people prioritize environmental protection as the main benefit of international cooperation, I believe that the primary focus tends to be on economic growth. The tangible and immediate advantages of economic collaboration often outweigh the more challenging and slower progress in environmental initiatives.

Sample 5:

Opinions are divided on whether the main benefit of international cooperation is found in environmental protection or the global economy. I think that increased collaboration between nations can result in both, as countries hold both in equal regard.

On the one hand, the significance of international cooperation in protecting the environment is too great to ignore. As the world is facing increasing environmental issues that transcend national boundaries, like pollution and climate change, no single country can deal with them alone. Hence, there is a great need for coordinated efforts, through which many countries with a range of expertise can collaborate on environmental research and share best practices, and even reach international agreements. This can aid in protecting critically endangered species and conserving biodiversity, which leads to a more sustainable environment around the world.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that multinational initiatives also benefit the world of business. In fact, in today’s globalized economy, cooperation is one of the main factors that facilitates trade, removes barriers and fosters economic growth. In other words, by promoting free trade, countries can have access to new markets, and attract foreign investment, which in turn, leads to innovation and technological advancement. For instance, developing countries like China, Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries are developing at a lightning-fast pace, bringing benefits to both themselves and other countries involved.

In conclusion, while international cooperation plays a vital role in addressing global environmental challenges, it also paves the way for economic growth and free trade among nations. The emphasis on these two aspects helps ensure both short-term and long-term development of human society and the global economy.

Sample 6:

The benefits of international cooperation are diverse, and opinions vary on its primary advantage. Some individuals argue that the paramount benefit lies in environmental protection, whereas others contend that global business is of greater significance. This essay will delve into both perspectives and offer a personal viewpoint.

On the one hand, a significant number of people assert that international collaboration is indispensable for safeguarding the environment. Global environmental challenges such as climate change, pollution, and deforestation transcend national boundaries and necessitate collective action. Through cooperation, nations can pool their resources, share expertise, and leverage technology to address these issues more effectively. For instance, multilateral agreements like the Paris Agreement have united numerous countries in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Such collaborative efforts play a vital role in ensuring that every nation plays its part in preserving the planet.

On the other hand, proponents of the opposing view posit that international cooperation primarily benefits global commerce. By working together, countries can forge trade pacts, lower tariffs, and enhance economic ties. This fosters increased trade volumes and investment flows, consequently bolstering the economies of participating nations. For example, institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO) facilitate international trade, streamlining business operations across borders. Consequently, enterprises can broaden their market reach, enhance profitability, and generate employment opportunities.

From my perspective, although international cooperation holds significance for both environmental conservation and global trade, the pivotal advantage lies in environmental protection. Urgent environmental issues impact individuals worldwide. Failure to collaborate in addressing these challenges could yield catastrophic consequences for all nations. While international business is undeniably crucial, it is a sector that can expand and evolve gradually. In contrast, environmental crises demand immediate attention and cannot be delayed.

In conclusion, international cooperation yields substantial benefits in both environmental preservation and global commerce. However, I contend that the paramount advantage is in environmental protection, given its urgent nature that necessitates prompt global intervention.

Sample 7:

International cooperation brings numerous benefits to the world. Opinions differ on whether its main advantage lies in environmental protection or global business. Both perspectives are valid and carry significant weight. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and share my opinion.

On the one hand, many argue that the primary benefit of international cooperation is protecting the environment. Environmental issues, such as climate change and pollution, are global problems that require global solutions. For instance, Vietnam has faced severe air pollution and rising sea levels. Through international agreements like the Paris Agreement, Vietnam has received aid and technology to combat these challenges. Such cooperation helps nations reduce their carbon footprint and preserve natural resources for future generations.

On the other hand, others believe that the key advantage of international cooperation is boosting global business. Cooperation opens up markets, encourages trade, and leads to economic growth. For example, Vietnam's participation in international trade agreements like the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has led to job creation and increased foreign investment. This, in turn, has improved the country's economy and raised the standard of living for its citizens. 

In conclusion, both environmental protection and global business are significant benefits of international cooperation. In my opinion, while each aspect is crucial, the protection of the environment should be prioritized. Without a healthy planet, economic growth will be unsustainable in the long run. Therefore, nations should use international cooperation to address environmental issues while also reaping the benefits of global business.

Sample 8:

The effects of globalization are very beneficial in many ways. I believe the ever-expanding cross-border collaboration benefits both environmental conservation and global business. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both views and provide my viewpoints.

On the one hand, environmental protection has evolved in recent years as more nations and global organizations have been involved. To start, international cooperation can gather up additional governments to address some global issues that don’t appear conceivable to be resolved by just one or a few nations. By holding a summit meeting, for instance, each government will be better aware of its obligations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which is a valuable method to slow down the rate of global warming. Additionally, by working together more, scientists and researchers throughout the world might exchange more sophisticated technology to address environmental problems. This method is beneficial, especially for emerging nations with more severe ecological issues and technology is more advanced.

On the other hand, globalization also has significant economic benefits for international trade. First, international cooperation will encourage various nations to use their unique advantages to the fullest extent possible, maximizing their potential for economic growth. Using China as an example, the country’s massive population encourages manufacturers and other labor-intensive companies to invest, increasing employment possibilities. More international commerce operations can also give individuals more access to high-quality foreign goods, raising their standard of living and enjoyment. Finally, more international collaboration will eventually be advantageous to the world economy.

In conclusion, the two fundamental effects of globalization, environmental preservation and business, cannot easily be compared since they are two separate fields with very different priorities.

Sample 9:

International cooperation is often debated regarding its primary benefits, with some arguing it is crucial for environmental protection, while others believe it is essential for world business. This essay will examine both perspectives and present my own view.

On one hand, international cooperation is essential for addressing global environmental issues. Environmental problems such as climate change, deforestation, and pollution do not adhere to national borders and require collaborative efforts for effective management. The Paris Agreement is a prime example of how countries can unite to set global targets for reducing emissions and combating climate change. Such cooperation allows nations to pool resources, share technology, and coordinate strategies, which can lead to more impactful and widespread environmental initiatives. For environmentalists, international cooperation is seen as crucial for ensuring a sustainable future and preserving natural resources for future generations.

On the other hand, proponents of world business argue that international cooperation primarily benefits the global economy. In a globalized world, trade agreements and international partnerships are vital for economic growth. Agreements like NAFTA, for example, have facilitated smoother trade between countries, expanded market access, and created economic opportunities. International business collaborations can drive innovation, enhance competition, and improve living standards. From this perspective, the economic benefits of international cooperation are substantial, as they contribute to global prosperity and development.

In my opinion, while both environmental protection and world business benefit from international cooperation, protecting the environment should be the top priority. The long-term health of the planet is crucial for sustaining economic growth and quality of life. Without a healthy environment, economic achievements may be undermined. Therefore, international cooperation should focus primarily on environmental preservation to ensure a balanced and sustainable future for all.

In conclusion, international cooperation offers significant benefits for both environmental and economic interests. However, prioritizing environmental protection is essential for long-term sustainability and overall well-being.

Sample 10:

International cooperation plays a crucial role in addressing global challenges, and opinions vary on its main benefits. While some argue that the primary advantage lies in the protection of the environment, others contend that it is in the realm of global trade and business. This essay will explore both perspectives and present an opinion that the main benefit of international collaboration is global businesses. 

One viewpoint is that the main benefit of international cooperation is the protection of the environment. Global environmental issues, such as climate change, deforestation, and pollution, require collaborative efforts beyond national boundaries. Through international cooperation, countries can share knowledge, resources, and technologies to address these pressing challenges. For example, the Paris Agreement, a landmark international accord on climate change, demonstrates the significance of cooperation in mitigating the effects of global warming.

On the other hand, some argue that the primary benefit of international cooperation lies in the realm of world business. In an increasingly interconnected global economy, countries depend on each other for trade and investment opportunities. Cooperation among nations facilitates the removal of trade barriers, the establishment of fair regulations, and the promotion of economic growth. For instance, regional trade agreements, such as the European Union, have created a framework for member countries to engage in seamless trade, leading to economic prosperity and improved living standards.

In my opinion, world business is the most significant benefit of international cooperation. While international organisations emphasise environmental concerns that affect the well-being of the planet and all its inhabitants, a thriving global economy always get priority from such international organisations and collaborations and have a far-reaching impact on our lives.

In conclusion, international cooperation brings about various benefits and economic development, and global trade and business seem like the most important benefits that it offers.
Sample 11:

Nowadays, countries maintain a strong and healthy relationship with each other, leading to international cooperation. Many people argue that environmental issues could only be solved with mutual efforts, and this is the main benefit of international collaboration. Others, however, claim that nations join hands in order to achieve lucrative business opportunities around the globe. This essay will discuss both perspectives and argue in favour that environmental protection is the primary benefit of this cooperation.

On the one hand, international collaboration brings significant benefits to the world of business. It facilitates the exchange of goods, services, and investments among countries, creating opportunities for economic growth and development. For instance, trade agreements such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) provide a framework for countries to negotiate and regulate international trade, fostering economic integration and market access. Additionally, multinational corporations can leverage international collaboration to expand their operations globally, tapping into new markets, accessing diverse resources, and capitalizing on comparative advantages. Such global business collaboration stimulates innovation, creates job opportunities, and enhances economic prosperity for participating nations.

On the other hand, international cooperation provides a platform for countries to come together and develop collaborative solutions to pressing environmental challenges. These challenges transcend borders, and their effective resolution necessitates a coordinated response. For example, the Montreal Protocol, a landmark international environmental agreement, has successfully addressed the issue of ozone depletion by phasing out the production and use of ozone-depleting substances worldwide. This treaty showcases the power of international collaboration in tackling global environmental problems. By working together, countries can pool their resources, knowledge, and expertise to develop innovative strategies, share best practices, and implement sustainable policies for environmental conservation.

In conclusion, international cooperation plays a pivotal role in addressing global environmental challenges. By prioritizing the protection of the environment through collaborative efforts, countries can work together to find sustainable solutions, share knowledge and resources, and implement effective policies.

Sample 12:

Over recent decades, topics revolving around the influence of cross-border collaboration have given rise to heated controversies worldwide. Several people assume that such a collective attempt primarily benefits environmental protection, whereas others deem business undertakings as the major merit. The following essay will elaborate on both viewpoints before stating my personal perspective on this contentious matter.

On the one hand, the belief that multinational cooperation mainly exerts favorable impacts on safeguarding the environment is justifiable to a certain extent. To begin with, collaborative efforts manifested in such forms as transnational assemblies or treaties play a crucial role in addressing global ecological issues effectively. This can clearly be exemplified by the Kyoto Protol, an international agreement developed under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which encourages 192 parties to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions sustainably. Furthermore, cross-border collaboration can serve as a catalyst for certain countries’ development of technology aimed at protecting the environment. Specifically, more affluent nations, namely the US or EU, can provide financial and technological aid to less developed, resource-constrained ones that are ravaged by environmental degradation, thereby contributing to improved living conditions for all.

On the other hand, it is also reasonable to claim that the key advantage of cooperating internationally lies in the world of business. Firstly, enterprises’ profitability and growth can tremendously benefit from global collaborative acts. Since transnational partnership offers corporations increased access to their consumer base on a larger scale, their trading scope would no longer be confined by geographical boundaries, thus allowing them to maximize their profits and enhance the generation of revenue. On a larger scale, economic collaboration can also boost global economic integration by encouraging countries to focus on their competitiveness and provide supply to other parts of the world. In this way, developing countries like Vietnam and Africa play a vital role in the global supply of agricultural produce while the US and China serve as the main suppliers in the technology realm. 

In conclusion, advocates of both standpoints indisputably have valid arguments for their conviction. Personally, however, I would contend that the benefits of international cooperation are not constricted merely within the realms of environment and economics but positively affect all domains for the sake of long-term human prosperity.

Sample 1:

In this day and age, cultural globalization has led to similarities in various aspects of daily life, including fashion, advertising products, brands, diets and TV channels. From my point of view, while this phenomenon offers certain advantages of promoting an interconnected world, I believe the drawbacks outweigh benefits and warrant careful consideration.

There are various advantages of the world having close connections. First, it promotes cultural understanding and connection. Sharing the same media platform contributes to a better awareness of global events, which supports international cooperation and increases shared efforts to tackle timely issues such as wars or climate change. Moreover, the availability of brands allows for easier purchase of goods and services. For example, now we can get a fresh, tasty frappuccino from Starbucks right in Vietnam, instead of traveling to any other countries. This not only potentially improves the quality of life by stimulating competition between brands, but also facilitates economic growth worldwide. However, these benefits are overshadowed by the drawbacks. Despite promoting international dialogues and cooperation, the globalization of cultural patterns from all over the world can also lead to cultural homogenization. This poses a threat to unique traditions and local practices. The prevalence of international brands restricts space for local brands to expand their market size and gain public attention; even though their products might be of the same quality but at a much cheaper price. Moreover, many nations will face the risk of losing their identity if national citizens keep gravitating towards foreign products and neglect supporting local ones.

One might argue that cultural homogenization or the increased similarities between different countries are an important factor contributing to peace and cultural understanding. Nevertheless, engaging and appreciating differences between cultures must also be regarded as more important, for this also constitutes cultural sensitivity and peace between different nations. Fostering international cooperation and world peace, therefore, also involves exchanging and appreciating differences, rather than erasing them.

In conclusion, while the trend brings undeniable benefits, it poses risks to cultural diversity, local economies, and national identity. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a balance between welcoming international influence and optimizing unique, cultural privileges.

Sample 2:

In this day and age, contemporary attention has increasingly been placed on the opinion that the boundaries between countries are becoming blurred as people around the world consume the same media. Despite some drawbacks of this development, I believe the benefits still outweigh the downsides.

On the one hand, I must admit that there are some disadvantages to this trend. Firstly, limiting one’s media consumption to outlets that feature news from around the world can mean being ignorant about local news. For example, a small piece of local information, such as a recent robbery, can get lost among the various news coming from around the world. As a result, many people can become insensitive to changes in their local community. Secondly, one might lose one’s cultural identity if following global media outlets carelessly. With the rising trend of the Korean entertainment industry, many people in Vietnam are adapting to the Korean lifestyle. This trend, while generally harmless, has, in extreme cases, led some young adults to degrade their own cultural identities and chase after foreign cultures.

On the other hand, I believe the benefits still outweigh the downsides. Firstly, by following global news, we can learn about social issues happening in other countries and apply solutions to our own. For example, many Vietnamese, especially teenagers and young adults, were interested in the recent US presidential election. Many reported becoming more engaged in political issues in general. As a result, this year’s election in Vietnam saw a peak in engagement among young adults, with many discussions in online forums. Secondly, as more people watch the same media, like YouTube, it provides an opportunity to promote our own culture. For example, more international food bloggers and reviewers are visiting Vietnam because they saw videos and TV series about Vietnamese food on these global media outlets. As a result, the number of tourists to Vietnam has significantly increased.

In conclusion, I understand that there are some disadvantages to this globalization trend in media consumption. However, I think that the advantages brought by this development far outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 3:

Many aspects of culture and people's lifestyles are becoming increasingly similar throughout the world. Although this trend has some benefits, I would agree that the disadvantages are more noteworthy.

On the one hand, the global reach of fashion brands, similar eating habits and similar traditions of people have some major benefits. For instance, Starbucks, the renowned coffee chain, has grown from a single outlet in Seattle to as many as 30,000 shops in around sixty countries. Nearly identical stores serve cups of coffee to hundreds and thousands of customers, no matter whether you are sipping it in New York, London, New Delhi, Melbourne or Istanbul. Thus, the global business opportunity enables many brands to sell products all around the world. As a result, people can enjoy fashion, food and other aspects of diverse nationalities staying in their home country. A stronger bond could be observed among people no matter where they live as a consequence of their similar lifestyle. Thus, the differences among nations are reducing and this is quite helpful in maintaining world peace.

On the other hand, this trend has some striking disadvantages that we should be cautious about. Firstly, the spread of cross-cultural materialistic lifestyles and attitudes makes us less human and more selfish. For example, the role of TV advertisements by global brands, in most cases, is related to the concept of materialism. We are affected by terminal materialism that forces us to buy things for the sake of buying, instead of buying for basic needs. Secondly, with the aggressive spread of market economies and communication technology, local cultures and values are in peril. The true identity and culture are in jeopardy with the influence of alien cultures and the new generation cares less about their history and tradition.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of globalisation and the similar lifestyle of people due to the similar culture in the world far outweigh the few advantages it has.

Sample 4:

The discrimination among nations in terms of people's lifestyle, access to information, eating habits and cultural aspects are diminishing with the effect of globalisation and widespread acceptance of technology. Some people see it as a threat to cultural identity, but I take it as a positive sign in terms of improved lifestyle and a better relationship among nations. Without a doubt, the merits of this exceed the disadvantages.

To begin with, globalisation and free trade concepts, that led to the similarities among nations, were not imposed by a rich nation on the rest of the world. Rather, it was a demand of the time that has reduced the gap among countries over time. For example, someone from a developing nation, these days, can avail themselves of the same branded clothes, food, technological devices and so on a citizen in an industrialised country can have. This not only enhances the freedom of choice for people but also opens the windows of opportunity to local brands on the international stage. If countries look more similar around the globe, it means just one thing - the wealth and life standard gaps among people are declining.

Moreover, the trend reduces the cultural gap among nations and help maintain world peace. Also, a growing number of people nowadays go to rich nations for study and work, and similar culture makes them adapt to a foreign country more easily. Freedom of the press and easy access to global information has accelerated this trend and there is no stopping to it.

Finally, the culture and tradition of a nation change over time even without the interference of any alien influence. Hence restricting the overwhelming facilities this trend brings is not a good idea at all, especially when the world still has a huge wealth gap and animosity among nations.
To conclude, the wealth and power gaps among nations may lead to conflicts, and this is why people should be treated as global citizens rather than citizens of a specific country. To make this dream come true, international brands, TV channels and other global facilities should be present in every corner of the world.

Sample 5:

Differences among nations are becoming less perceptible these days as people all over the world are sharing the same lifestyle, technology, fashion, foods, advertisements, and entertainment programmes. As a result, cultural identity and traditions are in peril. The following essay advocates that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of this trend.

The first benefit of this trend is that international brands can produce goods on a mass scale, and the manufacturing cost becomes cheaper. As a result, consumers enjoy the advantage of buying products from global brands at an affordable price. Secondly, people all over the world share the same culinary experience, and that is why they have more food options than ever before. For example, people around the globe can now purchase food based on their preference, whether it is Chinese, Indian or Western food or brands. Furthermore, this trend reduces the cultural barrier and brings people under a common platform where people will have more knowledge and respect about other nations and their customs.

On the contrary, the globalisation of the fashion, entertainment and culinary industries have some severe negative sides. First, many people abandon their cultural values due to this, which hurts the identity of a country. Besides, foreign television shows have negative influences on young people. Many global TV channels, for example, show programmes that are sensitive to other cultures. However, as these shows are easily accessible nowadays, many young people follow them, and as a consequence, adopt a non-acceptable lifestyle and life choices.

In conclusion, the globalisation of fashion, advertising, culinary and entertainment products have both advantages and disadvantages. But, carefully considering both, I strongly feel that it has more negative effects than positive aspects.

Sample 6:

These days, it is increasingly common to see people around the world adopting similar fashion trends, favoring the same brands, and even sharing identical eating habits and media consumption. Consequently, the distinct differences between countries are gradually diminishing. This essay will argue that the potential drawbacks of this trend significantly outweigh the benefits.

Granted, the global spread of positive trends, particularly those related to health and well-being, can have a beneficial impact on people's lives worldwide. For instance, the rise of social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram has made it easier for healthy eating habits to gain traction globally. As these lifestyles become popular, people across different regions are more likely to adopt these beneficial dietary practices, leading to improvements in public health.

However, the widespread adoption of global trends at the expense of local customs can lead to a gradual erosion of cultural identity. In Vietnam, for example, many young people have been influenced by Western cultures, adopting clothing styles that emphasize individual freedom. This influence has led to situations where traditional norms are disregarded, such as wearing inappropriate attire in sacred places like temples and pagodas. This lack of respect for local customs has sparked significant debate and even conflict within the community.

Beyond cultural erosion, the dominance of global brands poses a serious threat to local businesses. Large multinational corporations, with their vast resources, can easily outcompete smaller local enterprises through extensive marketing campaigns that shape consumer behavior. By way of illustration, global sports brands like Nike and Adidas have almost monopolized the sportswear market in many countries, leveraging their enormous budgets for advertising, sponsorships, and store placements. This leaves little room for local brands to thrive, ultimately stifling competition and diversity in the market.

In conclusion, while the increasing similarity between countries may offer some minor advantages, such as the dissemination of positive lifestyle trends, I believe that the negative consequences, particularly the loss of cultural identity and the challenges faced by local businesses, are far more significant. This trend threatens to homogenize global cultures and economies, ultimately leading to a less diverse and vibrant world.

Sample 7:

In recent times, the cultural differences between countries have diminished as people consume the same TV shows, advertisements, fashion, and brands. While this trend could have positive and negative consequences in equal measures, it is crucial to examine both aspects.

On the one hand, exposure to diverse media from different countries promotes cultural exchange and understanding. People are now more likely to appreciate and learn about various customs, traditions, and perspectives, fostering a more interconnected global community. For instance, the global popularity of K-pop, driven by music streaming platforms, social media, and online video sharing platforms, has allowed people from diverse cultures to engage with South Korean culture. Additionally, access to the same TV shows, advertisements, and media content allows individuals to stay informed about global events, trends, and ideas, which can broaden their knowledge and encourage a more global outlook. International news networks like CNN and BBC exemplify this by delivering extensive coverage of global issues to audiences worldwide.

On the other hand, the convergence of media and brands can lead to cultural homogenization, where local traditions and identities may be overshadowed by a globalized culture. This homogenization could result in the loss of unique cultural characteristics and the erosion of diversity. For example, McDonald's has established a global presence with franchises in numerous countries, often overshadowing local culinary traditions. Furthermore, global media and brands are frequently controlled by powerful multinational corporations, which can perpetuate socioeconomic inequalities and concentrate influence in the hands of a few dominant players. Companies like Google and Facebook exemplify this by dominating the global digital advertising industry, thereby limiting cultural representation and undermining local industries.

In conclusion, while the globalization of media and brands fosters cultural exchange and global awareness, it also poses significant risks to cultural diversity and local economies, making the advantages and disadvantages of this trend equally significant.

Sample 8:

We are now living in a global village where geographical barriers have become insignificant. People wear the same kind of clothes all over the world, eat the same foods and watch the same films. In my opinion, this trend has made life easier for us all.

There are several benefits to following global fashion trends. It makes traveling easier. For example, now, Indians and Americans or Europeans have more or less the same tastes in fashion, food, and music. As a result, young Indian professionals can travel to the US or Europe and still feel at home there. The biggest advantage of following a global lifestyle is that it eliminates culture shock when you travel to other countries. It also protects you from discrimination. When you wear the same kind of clothes or eat the same kind of food as everyone else, you will not stand out. This will actually protect you from various forms of discrimination that you might experience when you are in a foreign country. An Indian woman living in the US will be at a disadvantage if she insists on wearing only traditional Indian clothes and eating only vegetarian foods. This will limit her choices, but if she is willing to follow the culture of the country she lives in, life will be easier for her.

The only disadvantage of this trend is the loss of ethnicity. Every nation has its traditional styles of fashion and clothing. When everyone wears the same kind of clothes, this cultural legacy gets lost.

To conclude, the benefits of following global trends in lifestyle and fashion are many. It makes life easier for globetrotting youngsters. There are, nonetheless, a few disadvantages, but there is an easy way to get around them. People who are proud of their ethnic fashion and lifestyle can follow it when they are in their own country.

Sample 9:

Globalisation has allowed people to adopt a homogeneous culture in terms of entertainment, fashion and other areas as such. However, there are some people who believe such uniformity isn’t very beneficial. This essay shall discuss further both the sides of this phenomenon.

Having the same kind of preferences helps people get around the world very easily. If we watch TV shows or adverts of a certain country, we get familiar with a summary of its culture, thereby making it easier for us to blend in there. The more we get to know about each other, the more can the differences between countries be eliminated, making the world a huge harmonious community. We are no longer restricted to brands of our own country but are exposed to international products and services. Following a global fashion trend shall make you feel and act more naturally with the people anywhere in the world without being too obvious.

The people who do not support such a development are the ones who feel a country’s own ethnicity will be lost if the people try to adopt the prevailing global culture a little more than required. Watching TV shows or movies from a foreign country may influence and alter the mannerisms of the people of the home country. Some cultures are very rigid when it comes to clothing and the acceptance of universal fashion trends therefore will not be received well. Although, I feel these are minor issues in comparison to the host of advantages that we have regarding this. One’s own ethnicity can be followed regardless of the TV shows we watch or the clothes we wear.

To conclude, I agree that the advantages of the phenomenon of having a uniform culture worldwide outweigh the disadvantages. Every subject has pros and cons, and the cons here can be ignored easily, especially when such an acceptance makes life easier.

Sample 10:

The globalization of culture is a phenomenon that has sparked much debate, with some arguing that the increasing homogenization of societies across the globe is a positive trend, while others lament the loss of unique cultural identities. While it is undeniable that globalization has led to a convergence of cultural elements, such as advertising, brands, food, and entertainment, the question of whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages remains open to interpretation.

On the one hand, the spread of global brands and cultural products can foster a sense of interconnectedness and shared experience. Access to international entertainment, fashion, and cuisine can broaden people’s horizons and promote understanding between different cultures. For example, the widespread popularity of K-pop music and Korean dramas has fostered a sense of global community among fans, breaking down cultural barriers and encouraging cultural exchange. Moreover, the adoption of international brands and products can drive economic growth and create job opportunities in developing countries.

However, the homogenization of cultures can also have negative consequences. The erosion of unique cultural traditions and identities can lead to a loss of diversity and a sense of cultural displacement. The dominance of Western cultural products can stifle the development of local creativity and expression, leading to a decline in cultural distinctiveness. For instance, the proliferation of fast-food chains and multinational supermarkets has often resulted in the displacement of traditional cuisines and local food markets, contributing to a loss of cultural heritage and culinary diversity.

In conclusion, while the globalization of culture has brought about increased interconnectedness and a sense of shared experience, its potential for cultural homogenization and the erosion of unique traditions raises concerns. While the advantages of global cultural exchange are undeniable, it is crucial to strike a balance between embracing global influences and preserving local identities. The preservation of cultural diversity is paramount in ensuring a rich and vibrant tapestry of human expression and a world that celebrates the unique heritage of each nation.

Sample 11:

The striking similarity between countries as a result of globalization and modernization has been a heated social issue in debate, leading to many showing concern about elimination of national identity. However, I strongly believe this trend’s advantages outweigh its shortcomings.

The root cause of such resemblance between nations is the accelerating trend of multiculturalism. People who are against this trend have grounds to claim that the high-level similarity means the eradication of culture gap between countries, thus leading to all traditional values of a nation being completely abolished. When English, international clothing stores and American pop music, for example, are overwhelmingly prevalent in the streets of a country, its native language, local brands and folk music would face the imminent threat of total disappearance.

On the other hand, this interconnectedness among countries has benefits that cover many different areas. It reciprocally developed economies all over the world and increased cultural exchanges. Specifically, in an age of thriving international business and travelling, all countries are required to reorganize their infrastructures for the purpose of reaching global standards. To illustrate, the construction of railway stations and airports always follow the international norms, while information printed on packages, billboards and food menus are translated into English, the universal language. Pop culture also immensely contributes to this trend of similarity. With exposure to advertisements of multinational companies, young people around the world now have a similar taste in fashion, technological devices and eating habits. Such a globally common preference also makes people in different regions look the same.

In conclusion, with geographical barriers becoming less significant, some individuals may express concerns about cultural identity loss. Nevertheless, the beneficial impacts of globalization on cultural and economic aspects remain paramount. 

Sample 12:

The world today is more aptly said to be a global market where almost every country witnesses the same kind of brand market in every field. The globalization of the world has opened the doors for the intermingling of the different cultures, lifestyles, traditions of the different countries. Often it is found that the global brands have started launching their products keeping in mind the wide global audience with different tastes, suiting their lifestyle. There is a clear sign that the differences between the countries have started to become less evident than before and this brings with them certain advantages as well.

Speaking about globalization, people now have become more open to broad ideas, and world views. The sphere of vision has increased from a small area of land to a vast world. This can be seen in the fact that now we have global channels with global reach with the vast diverse audiences sitting in different countries but loving the same character, unlike before where our reach was only confined to local regional channels. For example, an American sitcom, FRIENDS, became more popular in India, China, Middle East countries, and other European countries and brought the culture of Coffee Cafes’ in the global market. Now, people of all the countries are accustomed to the same type of global fashion trends, food cuisines, and lifestyles, etc. This has helped in reducing the communication gap amongst people, increased the values of tolerance, acceptance, and sharing. Now it can aptly be said that the world has become a global home for its people where the cultural, educational, and traditional boundaries have outcast the physical boundaries. One of the biggest advantages counted here is it has brought more peace and unity to the world, unlike the old times that have witnessed some of the major wars like a world war, cold war, etc.

Though the advantages of globalization have been manifolded and the difference between different countries is reducing rapidly, but there are some spheres where such differences are quite visible like the economic inequality, literacy inequality, compliance with the sustainable development goals have been incompetent among different countries. To make the world a global home to live in, these inequalities need to be worked upon.

Sample 13:

In these modern times, it has become quite evident that the world portrays the image of a friendly global market, with globalized consumers from remote corners of the world. Nowadays, a fashion idea launched in the USA has become a fashion trend in India, or an Indian cinema becoming a Blockbuster movie in Canada. The modern world has opened the wide market of acceptance of each other’s culture, ideas, cuisines, fashion, art, lifestyle and so on. This has made the fact crystal clear that the differences between the countries of the world are vanishing at a rapid pace. But these vanishing differences are bringing a lot of disadvantages along with advantages. Some of these disadvantages are included in the paragraph below.

We have often seen that people are more attracted towards international junk foods items than their traditional food. The attraction for these international junk food items has overpowered the nutritional value of traditional food. The changing food habits of the people have deteriorated their health and impacted the lifestyle of the people to a great extent. The vanishing of the differences has made it evident that people are so influenced by international ideas and cultures and started following their lifestyles that they have forgotten the indigenous cultures and values. For example, a culture-rich and diverse country like India has become more westernized in its culture and lifestyle that they have started to lose their indigenous values and culture. This has brought a drastic change to the value-added system of the country. With globalization, international relations have undoubtedly become better in terms of trade and economy but the living conditions of the rural or the poor people in the indigenous countries have become worse.

To blow off the differences between the countries in the true sense, the need of the hour is to bring everyone to the same page, to improve the living and working conditions of the people globally, to improve the environment unitedly, to work upon achieving the sustainable development goals together. This will help in bringing the people together on the same platform and will make the world a global home in the true sense, outcasting all the boundaries.

Sample 14:

The globalized world has evolved so rapidly in modern times that the ethnic and global differences between the countries have started to vanish. People across the globe have become more accepting and tolerant of other countries, cultures, and ideas. This has made the world stand on a platform of inclusiveness globally. The diminishing of the differences between the countries of the world has brought with it several advantages and disadvantages.

Talking about the advantages first, with the increasing communication facilities, the world has involved itself in each other’s emotional area. Now with the wide prevalence of global media, we are aware of everything happening across the world, and they have started to become involved in the struggles of other countries' people. This has increased the value of humanity for each other. The killing of a black man in America has witnessed a global protest on ‘Black Lives Matter. The victory of Barcelona in Football is celebrated among football fans in India. Indian movies do blockbuster business in Canada. This social acceptance has made the world a global home, where many foreigners visit our countries and many students and working professionals of our country settle abroad for education and work. Social and cultural acceptance has made the festival of one country celebrated globally by all. Besides, the vanishing differences have brought world peace among different countries and friendly relations with all. Also, the world economy has been booming like anything due to the extinction of these differences among countries.

Coming to disadvantages we see that with rapid globalization, the indigenous culture and morals have lost their values. People are so influenced by westernized ideas that they tend to have forgotten their roots. Another disadvantage is that the eating habits of people have changed drastically, and this change has a negative impact on their health. People are more influenced by junk food ideas that they find their traditional food tasteless. People have started to lose their original identities in the pursuit of modern ideas.

In conclusion, though the vanishing differences have been quite evident, and they have created a huge impact on the lifestyle of the people for good as well as for bad. It is good to change with time, but one must never forget their roots and must stick to their culture and traditions rationally and logically.

Sample 15:

It is an undeniable fact that nations are becoming less different from year to year. These days, different societies living around the globe tend to have the same tastes in relation to fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. I believe that the benefits of such globalizing processes far outweigh their drawbacks because they imply that an increasing number of people are enhancing the quality of their living. This essay will first discuss improving the standards of living as the main benefit of cultural globalization, followed by an analysis of the major drawback which is the assumed loss of cultural identity by some communities.

One of the principal advantages of sharing the same cultural values is a positive change in the quality of living people have. The reason for this is that societies can normally adopt only those new values, which are more beneficial than existing ones. As a result, sharing the same fashions, advertising, eating preferences, brands and TV content is accompanied by enhancing the standards of living. For example, having carried out research, the scientists from The International Monetary Fund have revealed that the quality of living in developing countries has increased three times compared to that in 2000.

The main disadvantage associated with such cultural unification is thought to be the possible loss of cultural identity by countries affected by this trend. Often people presume that new values are rapidly replacing the old ones, which means that the original set of cultural features may be totally lost in time. However, it is clear that existing cultural uniqueness is only becoming less popular, despite this it continues to be shared by smaller societies. This is confirmed by a European university's new study that has revealed the preservation of the root culture in all the nations since 1985.

In conclusion, in my opinion, the benefits of cultural unification outweigh the disadvantages in the long run because enhancing standards of living is far more important than the irrational fear of losing cultural identity. If it were not for globalization, the quality of living in less developed nations would be much lower.

Sample 16:

It is undoubtedly the case that the world today has become a global village. One of the effects of this is that increasingly people in all corners of the world are exposed to similar services and products and adopt similar habits. My view is that this is largely a beneficial process and in this essay I will explain why.

The first point to make is that there are some downsides to this process of cultural globalisation, but these are relatively minor. The most significant of these disadvantages is that it can weaken national culture and traditions. For example, if people watch films and television programmes produced in the United States, sometimes they adopt aspects of the lifestyle of the American characters they see on television. Typically, however, this only affects minor details such as clothing and does not seriously threaten national identity.

When we turn to the other side of the argument, there are two major points to make in favour of this process. The first of these is that the more we share habits, products and services, the better we understand each other, and this reduces prejudice against other nations. The other point relates to modernity. It is a sign of progress in a society where people no longer are restricted to brands and advertisements from their own society but are able to access more international goods. If, for example, they were unable to drink Coca Cola or wear Nike, then that would mean their society was not part of the international community.

In conclusion, I understand the point of view of people who worry about cultural globalisation because it is a threat to national traditions. However, this is outweighed by its positive impact on international understanding and the fact that it represents progress within a society.

Sample 17:

As the proverb goes, "Every coin has its two sides". Globalization is no exception. Many countries throughout the world are sharing similar patterns in their own culture. Despite having some benefits, I still consider this trend more negative.

On the one hand, shortened global distance has created many advantages. In the fashion industry, the traditional cultures of several states provide a variety of ideas and materials for making clothes. People tend to share their styles, which diversifies the fashion around the world. Additionally, business is becoming increasingly international. It creates opportunities for employment and makes huge profits. Besides, people over the world become closer. They would communicate with each other more easily despite having different languages, be no more challenging to travel and gain chances to approach to knowledge from other countries.

On the contrary, I advocate that drawbacks of globalization become more serious. The public is likely to wear clothes that are trendy and from the luxurious brands. This habit makes them lose the connection to traditional costumes. Additionally, many people do not really have knowledge about the real products, which cheats them pay a lot of money for fake stock. Besides, the development of ways to communicate over the world leads to the shortage of direct spoken. People seem to be talking face to face unnecessary due to misusing technological gadgets. Lastly, the biggest problem is unemployment and exploitation. Because companies tend to move to developing countries where labor is cheap. This creates redundancies and job losses, which are major issues these days.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of shortening the global gap do outweigh the benefits.
Sample 18:

The contemporary times have been witnessing the blurring of dissimilarities, in terms of choice of food, clothing and entertainment, across the world. This phenomenon is believed to be having a domino effect, which has appeared in favourable and unfavourable manifestations. 

To start with, this trend has come in as a boon for mankind: people all over the world are abandoning their heterogeneous aspirations and tastes and are embracing homogeneity. This evolution has been hailed as extremely beneficial, it is helping people develop a broader and liberal perspective and understanding about other cultures, aiding in bridging the gaps based on culture, ethnicity, geography and nationality, and establishing enduring harmonious relationships among the citizens of the global village. This raises the possibility of resolution of conflicts without firing a bullet, and peace descending on the planet. 

Moreover, it is undeniable that this shift towards global preferences has ushered in an era of unprecedented convenience. Now, people travelling to different parts of the globe to fulfill their objectives of gaining education, finding suitable employment, receiving appropriate medical assistance and intervention and exploring for leisure and enjoyment, rarely need to worry about easily adapting to the alien surroundings, they feel at home anywhere on the planet now. 

However, this dilution of distinct aspects of diverse global cultures has a major flaw, it is causing the demise of unique traditions and ways of life, especially of the weaker cultures. Many fear this will lead to an irreversible loss of invaluable knowledge that has been accumulated over several ages, for mankind. 

Overall, I feel even though this swing towards the global preferences has exposed many customs and beliefs to the possibility of extinction, the advantages derived from this tendency eclipse even the direst of the failings.

Sample 1:

In this competitive world, the state of true happiness has become really difficult to achieve. Happiness has a different meaning for different people. In my opinion, some people struggle a lot to achieve happiness, whereas others are chronically happy, irrespective of the situation. This essay will explore why it is difficult to define happiness and what are the different factors influencing happiness.

As we know, different people have different levels of needs. These unsatisfied needs further stimulate an individual to act in order to satisfy them. Once the needs of a specific level are satisfied, an individual starts aspiring to move on to the next level needs. Fulfilment of needs leads to satisfaction which further provides happiness to a person. Therefore, we can say that happiness is a by-product of satisfaction. Since people perceive happiness differently, they find it difficult to quantify happiness. Moreover, happiness is nothing but a state of mind. For example, a highly affluent person may not be contented with what he has; on the contrary, a poor person can be happy while struggling for a day’s meal.

Similarly, there are various determiners of happiness. The first and foremost is a feeling of content. A person who has a feeling of a positive sense of discontent always remains happy. In other words, such a person is happy with his work and life but still aspires for more and more to learn and to achieve. The other factor is the locus of control or the key to happiness. A person is either controlled by external factors, or he is capable of controlling them. As a result, his happiness is decided by the other people or things, not by his own mind. If people are able to control their minds, then they can control their own happiness, no matter what the circumstances are.

To conclude, happiness depends on our attitudes and perceptions. As far as we have the keys to happiness in our hands, nothing external in this world can affect the level of our happiness and satisfaction.

Sample 2:

In the materialistic world, happiness is the primary requisite of every individual on earth as it is a fundamental ingredient to lead a quality of life. Happiness varies from person to person, and it cannot be explained in one word as every individual has a different definition of happiness. Therefore, it isn’t easy to describe the actual purpose of happiness. However, physical and psychological factors are regarded as crucial to acquire happiness in life.

Everyone is in search of happiness, and for some people, achieving happiness is the ultimate goal. But the way of achieving happiness differs as every individual has a different perspective towards living a quality life. For some people, happiness is when they start earning and receive their salary or achieve their dream. Some people have a sense of satisfaction when their health is fit and fine. There are others who associate peacefulness and excitement as an idea of happiness. Therefore, humans are never satisfied with what they have. For example, if one accomplishes their goal or aim in life, they’re not content with it. They want it more and continue hustling. As a result, this cycle continues. Thus, the term ‘happiness’ is indefinite and cannot be measured by any standards.

Despite the definition of happiness varying and remaining a mystery, many factors help an individual achieve felicity. For instance, some of them attain greatest joy in sharing life experiences with loved ones, family and friends. Some believe that happiness is when their basic survival needs are fulfilled. Others assume that money is the most obvious resource that would bring joy in their lives. Therefore, happiness is merely based on a person’s state of mind.

To conclude, happiness is one of the essential feelings in everyone’s life. Although it’s complicated to delineate this emotion, people have their ways and requirements to accomplish happiness. However, my definition of joy in life is having sound health, an understanding family, and a sense of freedom.

Sample 3:

Undoubtedly, happiness is an indispensable emotional factor that human beings generally pursue in their day-to-day lives. When it comes to describing happiness, it would be ungovernable, as the meaning of happiness depends upon people, and it varies tremendously. But there is an array of contributing factors that help people to incur elevated psychological patience and satisfaction.

To begin with, happiness could have varying definitions that are influenced by a gamut of opinions. Although I believe it is quite a simple need for humans, it can be incurred from any material or living substance. Some people seek pleasure from material possessions, some from wealth and some from companionship. Furthermore, there are people who conquer happiness by driving an expensive car or owning a mansion or having a higher social status. A caring and supportive family offers the utmost peace and happiness that is difficult to achieve if you stay alone. If you have a family and want the best for them, you may seek happiness from growing revenue or income.

Seemingly, there are plenty of points that play a vital role in a delightful and happy life. First and foremost, I think money could be the eminent resource that can bring a smile to anybody’s face. Second, a loving family, raising a child or being a good citizen with a top position can also make some people happier than ever.

In conclusion, happiness is an essential part of everybody’s lives, and people delineate this specific emotion by interlinking it with a variety of stimulating factors and the surrounding environment.

Sample 4:

Happiness is a characteristic that vastly governs the functions of human lives. The idea of a happy and fulfilling lifestyle is one of the greatest, if not the only objectives, of a person’s existence. It is difficult to ascertain a definitive source of joy or the very denotation of the word itself, as it may significantly vary from one individual to another due to personal preferences. However, several aspects of a person’s life are consequential in determining the degree of jubilation one enjoys.

First and foremost, it is essential to understand that happiness is unique to every human being. What might be cheerful to a person may be dull and even unpalatable to another. The reason behind such variance lies in the fundamental nature of human beings, which inherently differs from person to person. One might derive tremendous delight from merely being in the company of loved ones, whereas the same might only be attainable with the aid of expensive possessions and bourgeois practices for many.

Nevertheless, there are avenues available that greatly refine the general quality of life led by people. Before seeking happiness, one must make sure to maintain physical and mental well-being. The virtue of leading a robust way of life that involves physical exercise, a proper diet and healthy socialising must be recognized before pursuing materialistic or even abstract joys. Furthermore, supporting and being congenial to loved ones, acquaintances and strangers alike help bring about a level of pleasure that is found nowhere else.

Finally, an absolute fount of contentment will always remain a mystery to the human race. However, to enjoy a naturally blissful existence, we must care for the people around us and ourselves at the same time.

Sample 5:

Everybody desires to be happy in life and interestingly the requirements to be cheerful vary from person to person. This is the main reason why defining happiness is not that easy. However, there are some common things that are regarded important to be delighted in life.  

Defining happiness is quite challenging because the requirements to achieve it are not fixed. While someone dreams that his economic freedom would make him happy, a very rich man dreams about having a caring family to be happy. Similarly, a couple who do not have any child think about having a baby all the time and would be ready to do anything for that. On the contrary, many poor families, mostly in poor countries, find more children to be their burden. The practical world is quite puzzling, and humankind wants more than they have. When a person’s aim or expectation is fulfilled, he wants more, and this is a never-ending process. This is why happiness is not a simple word that we can describe with a neat and precise definition.

However, there are some vital factors that are commonly regarded as the main ingredients to be happy in life. First of all, physical and psychological soundness is very important to be happy and people can truly realise that when they get sick. Economic freedom - the ability to fulfil the needs in life, is the second most important factor to be happy, in my opinion. It is often said that being happy with an empty stomach is not possible. Thirdly, having a happy family where members love each other and care for them is considered important to be at peace in life. It is usually rare to find a happy person who does not have a pleasant family. Individual freedom is also considered a great influence to be happy in life. Someone without personal freedom cannot feel happy. Most importantly, being contented in life is the key to being happy. If someone can be contented with whatever little he has, he will be happy in life.

In conclusion, though there is no easy and precise definition of happiness, common attributes like sound health, caring family, freedom and personal contentment are regarded to be key ingredients to be happy in life.

Sample 6:

It is true that happiness is a prerequisite to people’s quality of life, although an actual definition of happiness seems to be difficult to describe, there are various factors which considered being crucial in acquiring happiness.

It is quite laborious to find out an actual definition for the term HAPPINESS. The reason for this is that happiness means different things to different people. Most people may have at least one hobby or a treat which could help them to uplift their spirits instantly. While for some people, it might be their job or a career which brings them a sense of fulfilment. At the same time, for others, personal belongings are paramount of a serene life. To take an example of a web designer, Richard Jackson, who believes that the key element for a pleasurable life is a close relationship. In my case, happiness is when I am taking my time out of a hectic routine to spend quality time along with my family.

There do seem to be some common needs that we all share in regard to experiencing or achieving pleasure. Firstly, investing in personal relationships can give a broad (long) way to boost up people’s level of happiness. For instance, spending even a fraction of time from a whole day with your children while doing some share activities could help to build up an immense mutual understanding as well as an inner satisfaction in them, which is a subtle precursor to bring in levelled happiness. Secondly, a prestigious line of work could help to raise people’s contentment by allowing them to have an ample number of wages. As a result, they can entertain themselves with all the basic necessities of life without worrying about any financial distress.

To sum up, due to the nature of happiness it is not that easy to describe it in one specific sentence. We can merely acknowledge several factors which are mandatory to some extent in seeking happiness.

Sample 7:

Happiness is an indispensable emotional factor that we usually pursue in our everyday life. In terms of delineating happiness, it would be intractable, as the meaning varies from person to person. However, apparently, there are several contributing factors of happiness, by which people may incur exalted satisfactions and psychological forbearances.

First of all, happiness may tend to have a definition that varies from several opinions of scholars. Though, I believe it is the simplest need of human beings, which could be incurred from any living or material substance. Some people search for pleasure from their wealth, material possessions and social hierarchies while others believe that happiness is a treasure, which could be only possessed from companionship. For example, a supportive and caring family provides someone with an utmost happiness and peace that could not be achieved by the lonely one. Additionally, other people may conquer this positive emotion by owning a mansion or driving an expensive car or having high social status.

Apparently, there are several points that play an essential role to grab a happy and delightful life. Firstly, I assume that money could be the most eminent resource that may bring the smile to anyone’s face. Secondly, some happiness could not be traded off with high salaries such as having loving families or raising a child to be a good citizen or holding a top position at school or colleges.

To conclude, happiness is a foremost essential part of our lives, and we delineate this emotion by linking it with our surrounding environment and various stimulating factors.

Sample 8:

People have always been in search of happiness since ancient times and still many of us are trying to find it throughout our whole life. But happiness differs from person to person, and it can’t be explained in one word. That’s why it is always difficult to determine its controversial and deep essence.

There are many reasons to think that full happiness is impossible to achieve and moreover it is non-existent in reality. But it is not true, and I strongly believe that people underestimate the value of everyday happiness they have living their lives. Standards of being happy in many cultures and countries are quite diverse. For instance, in Asian cultures, the main factors which influence the felicity of its peoples are a big family, care and respect for elders, following the traditions of their ancestors, religion and harmony with nature and others, material things are less important.

As for western civilisation, the situation is quite different and essential factors in happiness attainment are rather material than spiritual. According to many investigations in this sphere, Europeans are very concerned about money, high social status in society, good job, and education. They spend all their lives in pursuit of financial success and material boons are very significant for them. The majorities start their families and have children in their early thirties after having done some progress in the career field. As it can be seen the criteria of happiness are rather wide and varied for millions of people, but nevertheless many things are very similar. All of us would like to be happy in many ways in this life: to be healthy and wealthy, have a family and children, be successful in career, have good friends and live a long and interesting life. It seems to me that the main factors in gaining happiness are support from your family and friends, harmony with yourself and surrounding world, good health and so on.

To conclude I would like to say that we are happy only by one great reason, that is our birth into this beautiful and wonderful world, full of many opportunities and chances to believe in happiness.

Sample 9:

WHO defines health as ‘Physical, social and mental well-being’. It is a common misconception that absence of physical ailments makes us healthy and undermining the importance of mental and psychological aspects of health. Happiness broadly relates to the psychological well-being of an individual.

Happiness, though a very important part of life, unfortunately, is a relative term and poorly defined. It is also different for an individual. It may change from time to time. For example, achieving a set financial goal makes a person happy, but this may not be the same for others. For, a kid, a new toy makes him happy. Enjoying with friends, going on a vacation, clearing examination, new job, marriage, childbirth are some other examples of happiness at different stages of life. Thus, every person defines happiness to his character and liking.

There are many ways to achieve happiness. According to me, happiness is finding “Inner peace”. Regular physical exercises can help to gain happiness. This not only improves fitness but also gives a sense of well-being. Practising yoga and meditation will keep your soul satisfied and calm.

Avoidance of addictions such as alcohol, cigarette, and other psychotropic drug are required for leading a happy life. Someone has quoted: “If you play with your brain, the brain will play with you.” These addictions make the person vulnerable to various diseases such as liver cirrhosis, lungs diseases and increase suffering both physically and economically.

Accepting the negative phases of life and searching for happiness in every moment would be the best strategy to remain happy. Mingling with friends, sharing joy and worries would be another best way to reduce pain and increase happiness. I believe, even if happiness is a relative term, the path of achieving it is common for all.

Sample 10:

Everyone wants to be happy in life, yet surprisingly, everyone has different prerequisites for happiness. This is the major factor behind how difficult it is to define happiness. To be happy in life, there are a few things that everyone agrees are essential.

It can be difficult to define happiness because there are no set rules for how to get there. A very wealthy man dreams about having a loving family to be happy, whereas someone else thinks that his financial freedom will make him happy. Similarly, a couple without children constantly fantasizes about starting a family and would go to any lengths to make it happen.

On the other hand, many impoverished families, especially in developing nations, realize that having additional children adds to their load. Humanity desires more than they have, and the real world is really perplexing. When a person's goal or expectation is met, he or she wants more, and this cycle repeats indefinitely. Because of this, happiness is not a straightforward concept that lends itself to a tidy description.

However, several important elements are frequently recognized as the key components of happiness in life. First and foremost, being healthy - both physically and mentally - is crucial for happiness, something that becomes abundantly clear to those who are ill. Economic independence, or the capacity to meet one's wants, is, in my opinion, the second most crucial component of happiness.

It's a common adage that you can't be content when you're hungry. Thirdly, it's thought that living in peace requires having a happy family where everyone loves and cares for one another. It is uncommon to come across a contented person who does not have a loving family. Individual liberty is regarded as having a significant impact on happiness in life.

Without personal freedom, happiness is impossible to experience. Most significantly, the secret to happiness is to be content with life. A person will be happy in life if he or she can be content with whatever little they have.

In conclusion, even though there is no clear-cut definition of happiness, it is generally agreed that having qualities like good health, a loving family, freedom, and personal contentment are necessary for happiness in life.

Sample 11:

A quality that heavily influences how people spend their lives is happiness. One of the main goals of a person's life, if not the only one, is to lead a happy and fulfilled lifestyle. It is challenging to pinpoint a specific cause of joy or the meaning of the word itself because it might differ greatly from person to person due to unique tastes. However, several factors in a person's life have an impact on how much joy they experience.

The first and most important thing to realize is that every person has their definition of happiness. What may be happy to one person may be boring or even unpleasant to another. The underlying character of humans, which essentially varies from person to person, is the cause of such variation. Being around loved ones can bring great joy, however, for many people, this kind of happiness can only be attained via the use of ostentatious things and bourgeois customs.

Nevertheless, some options significantly improve people's overall quality of life. It is important to prioritize maintaining one's physical and mental health before pursuing happiness. Before chasing economic or even abstract pleasures, one should appreciate the benefits of living a strong lifestyle that includes physical activity, balanced food, and social interaction. A level of joy not found anywhere else can also be attained by helping and being friendly to family, friends, and strangers alike.

Finally, the human race will never fully understand where the source of true contentment lies. But to live a naturally happy life, we must simultaneously take good care of those around us and ourselves.

Sample 12:

Happiness is a distinctive emotional experience that plays a paramount role in our lives, fundamental to leading a healthy, peaceful, and positive lifestyle. However, individuals perceive pleasure differently. Some find it in money and material possessions, while others believe it resides in emotions, moments, and relationships.

Defining happiness is challenging because it's a multifaceted and subjective experience that varies greatly from person to person. What brings pleasure to one individual may not necessarily bring it to another. It's influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors. For instance, some individuals find satisfaction in the companionship, love, and security marriage brings, seeing it as a significant milestone of personal joy. Conversely, others may find happiness in maintaining their independence, pursuing personal growth, and enjoying the freedom of a single life.

Despite the challenges in defining happiness, certain universal factors play a critical role in its attainment. Firstly, satisfying basic needs such as safety and sustenance is fundamental. These are necessary for the pursuit of higher forms of joy to be significantly improved. Secondly, the strength and quality of one's relationships with family and friends are essential. Genuine connections offer support and satisfaction beyond material success, as highlighted through personal experiences. Lastly, personal freedom and having a sense of purpose are indispensable for delight. Engaging in meaningful activities that align with one’s values brings a sense of accomplishment and contentment.

In conclusion, happiness encompasses physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being. Though it is challenging to define and describe, each person encounters pleasure in their own way.

Sample 13:

Being happy is not just about feeling adequate, it also directly influences our physical and mental health. Therefore, everyone prefers to be happy always. However, it is difficult to define happiness because it varies among different individuals and is influenced by cultural, social, and individual factors.

Understanding happiness is challenging due to diverse backgrounds and cultural norms. Each person's unique experiences shape their perception of joy, reflecting the richness of individuality. Appreciating this complexity fosters empathy and deeper connections with others, enhancing our overall well-being. For example, in a mixed neighbourhood, one family enjoys being with others, participating in events, and conversing with neighbours for enjoyment. However, another family prefers solitary activities, feeling happy when they excel in school or work. Both families contribute to the neighbourhood's vibrancy with their distinct ways of finding joy and living.

Achieving happiness hinges on a balance of factors such as meaningful relationships, pursuing passions, and maintaining good health. Practising gratitude and mindfulness are important, as well as setting realistic goals and staying strong when facing difficulties. For instance, maintaining strong connections with family and friends can bring joy and support during tough times. Pursuing hobbies and interests that ignite passion can add satisfaction to daily life. Regular exercise and healthy habits not only boost physical well-being but also contribute to a positive mindset.

In conclusion, while the concept of happiness may be challenging to define, its significance in human life cannot be overstated. Whether it's spending time with loved ones, pursuing your goals, or merely taking care of yourself, focusing on what brings joy can greatly enhance life.

Sample 14:

Happiness is essential in our lives. Without it, life can become meaningless and unbearable.  Even though people think about happiness in many different ways, it's hard to define it exactly because it means something unique to each person. 

Describing happiness is challenging because it signifies something different to everyone, with numerous factors to consider. What makes one person happy might not matter to someone else. This makes happiness a very personal and complex thing to understand. Moreover, the pursuit of pleasure, influenced by cultural, societal, and environmental factors, adds further complexity to its definition. Thus, defining happiness for everyone is difficult due to its complex nature and the variety of influencing factors.

Finding happiness involves various elements, both internal and external, and identifying what truly makes us happy is not always straightforward. Personal growth and having a purpose in life significantly contribute to our well-being. External factors like money, health, and resources also impact our satisfaction levels. However, having a lot of money does not necessarily equate to contentment. What matters most is the feeling of belonging, having control over your life, and meeting your basic needs. Happiness arises from a combination of feeling good internally and the circumstances around us.

In conclusion, happiness results from both our internal state and the external situations we face. It's not solely about personal growth and purpose but also how we manage external factors such as money and health. True happiness is found in a balance between feeling fulfilled internally and the events in our external lives.

Sample 15:

Achieving contentment plays a crucial role in everyone’s life. This concept is challenging to define because it greatly depends on each person’s circumstances. However, there are two major factors contributing to happiness in life, which include health and wealth.

Different perspectives on happiness largely derive from dissimilar living conditions. Most individuals experience satisfaction when they finally have what they used to lack, engendering various life goals and ambition. Therefore, an individual’s fulfillment often cannot be applied to others. This can be perfectly exemplified as individuals coming from impoverished backgrounds will feel happy simply by having enough money to live at a subsistence level. On the contrary, the rich often seek contentment in pursuing their personal hobbies or making donations for charitable causes. 

Wealth is one of the essential components that brings happiness. Having a sufficient amount of money will at least allow for a more carefree lifestyle when basic necessities ranging from adequate housing and food are guaranteed. A pertinent example of this is that poverty-stricken individuals will have to face immense financial pressure and always struggle to earn money as a result. Happiness also relates to a good physical and mental well-being. Those with full health can live life to the fullest by following leisurely pursuits including traveling and playing sports. Recent research and surveys conducted indicate that cancer patients are much more likely to develop depression as they generally do not have enough strength to do what they truly enjoy due to their chemotherapy treatment. 

In conclusion, the disparity in opinions concerning happiness originates from each individual’s family background. Nevertheless, life fulfillment is mainly determined by one’s health conditions and amount of wealth.

Sample 16:

There is an emotion that almost every animal feels when elated, ecstatic, and thrilled. Humans call it happiness, and nowadays, it seems that happiness is difficult to define. This essay will unravel some mysteries regarding it while throwing some light on the determinants of happiness.

There are various layers to happiness, and the intricacy of human emotions doesn’t make it simpler. Behaviorists, sociologists, and psychologists have scratched their heads to arrive at a conclusive definition, but it too depends on multifarious factors and is usually influenced by various pretexts. Moreover, it is a subjective feeling. In other words, everyone has a different measure, scale, and reasons for their own happiness. Hence, defining happiness is a difficult task.

The determinants of happiness, just like its definition, are varied. For instance, the gratification of scoring well after preparing thoroughly for exams constitutes happiness. Some might fancy an excursion to the unexplored places, sufficing their quota of happiness. Even getting a bar of chocolate from your father can bring happiness, so does a simple heart-to-heart conversation with a dear one. In general, one can derive happiness wherever one wishes to, which essentially encapsulates its mysteries. If an individual desires, they can smile and feel happy even in the harshest of times.

All in all, the difficulty of defining happiness does not seem to bother people, as everyone desires to be happy – some are readily able to achieve happiness while the rest have to work a bit. But eventually, one does get to experience the joyous emotion.

Sample 17:

The elusive nature of happiness, often shrouded in subjective interpretations, makes it a complex concept to define. Its significance varies across cultures, personalities, and life circumstances, rendering a universal definition challenging. This essay posits that happiness is predominantly influenced by personal fulfillment and social connections, underscoring the multifaceted aspects of this sought-after state.

Firstly, personal fulfillment emerges as a paramount determinant of happiness. This encompasses the realization of individual goals, aspirations, and the pursuit of passions, which imbue one's life with a sense of purpose and satisfaction. For instance, achieving professional milestones or mastering a new skill can elicit profound happiness, highlighting the intrinsic link between personal achievements and well-being. The unique journey towards these accomplishments underscores the subjective nature of happiness, where fulfillment is individually tailored. It is the depth of engagement in one’s pursuits and the sense of progress towards personal benchmarks that enrich the tapestry of life, enhancing the feeling of contentment and joy.

Moreover, social connections play an indispensable role in shaping one's happiness. Humans, inherently social beings, derive significant joy from relationships with family, friends, and the community. The support, love, and companionship provided by these bonds offer emotional sustenance, contributing to a sense of belonging and happiness. Research underscores this, revealing that strong social ties are correlated with higher levels of happiness. Therefore, the quality of one's relationships is a critical factor in the overall experience of happiness. Engaging in meaningful interactions and fostering relationships that provide mutual support and understanding are fundamental to nurturing our social well-being, reinforcing the essential nature of community and connection in our lives.

In conclusion, happiness is intricately linked to personal fulfillment and the quality of social connections. By focusing on achieving our personal goals and cultivating strong relationships, we pave the way towards a more fulfilling and joyful life. Recognizing the unique paths to happiness encourages a more personalized and compassionate approach to life’s journey.

Sample 18:

Defining happiness is akin to capturing a chameleon, constantly shifting colors to adapt to its environment. This dynamic nature makes happiness a subjective and multifaceted concept, varying significantly from one individual to another. This essay contends that happiness is primarily determined by the pursuit of personal passions and the strength of one's social network, providing a scaffold for a fulfilling life.

In the realm of personal development, the pursuit of one’s passions stands as a cornerstone of happiness. Engaging deeply in activities that resonate with one's core interests fosters a sense of achievement and self-fulfillment. For example, an artist finding solace and joy in the strokes of their paintbrush or a scientist experiencing a breakthrough moment in their research encapsulates the essence of happiness derived from personal endeavors. Such moments of triumph and the journey towards them enrich the soul, underscoring the notion that happiness is intrinsically tied to personal growth and the fulfillment of one's aspirations.

Conversely, the fabric of our social lives - interwoven with threads of relationships with family, friends, and colleagues - significantly influences our happiness. The quality of these relationships, characterized by mutual support, understanding, and love, provides a buffer against life's challenges and a source of joy. The act of sharing life’s triumphs and tribulations, from the mundane to the monumental, with loved ones amplifies happiness, reinforcing the idea that our connections are vital to our emotional well-being.

In synthesizing these perspectives, it becomes clear that happiness is not a one-size-fits-all formula but a delicate balance between personal satisfaction and social harmony. As we navigate through life's journey, understanding and embracing what brings us joy and who makes our lives richer is crucial. In essence, the quest for happiness is a personal expedition, guided by the compass of our passions and the maps of our relationships.

Sample 19:

Generally, people find it difficult to provide a definition of happiness, because it is a relative idea that varies from person to person. However, this essay considers both material and emotional well beings are the major determiners behind happiness.

Joy is an emotional feeling that individuals experience and therefore it can vary from person to person. Due to this reason, providing a common definition has become difficult. Some would view certain things as factors that give them joy while others would consider them as a nuisance. For instance, some enjoy listening to music in loud noise, whereas others might prefer a low mellifluous voice. Therefore, due to the change in preferences, it has become challenging to define enjoyment.

The two main factors that give happiness to mankind are materialistic features and emotional aspects. Materialistic elements are tangible possessions that individuals consider valuable to them. These include properties, jewelleries, vehicles, mobile phones and other such things. Men and women feel happy when they own these items. They strive to achieve these materialistic factors because it gives them joy. The other factor which makes them happy is emotional aspects such as maintaining good relationships with others, being truthful and honest, etc. Those individuals who gain happiness through emotional factors will always prioritize these values when dealing with people. For example, according to a study conducted by the University of West London, 43% of the respondents agreed that they gained happiness by materialistic items while 47% by emotional factors.

To conclude, happiness is a feeling and can differ from individual to individual which makes it hard to define. However, both tangible assets and intangible values equally can determine peoples’ happiness.

Sample 20:

Happiness is one of the most important things in life, and yet it is almost impossible to define due to the fact that it is completely subjective, and unique to individuals. However, in order to achieve happiness, there are some broad factors that most people require, and these are based around the fulfilment of human needs. This essay will explain the difficulty in defining happiness and explore some of the broad aspects which can contribute to achieving it.

Defining happiness is highly problematic due to its individual nature. One approach used by many economists has been to approximate happiness to the standard of living, which is defined by material wealth.  However, wealth and happiness are not the same thing: for certain individuals, greater wealth will indeed result in increased happiness, but for many people, other issues are more important. One definition that has been applied is based around a person’s perceived quality of life, which accounts for personal differences, and accepts that there is not a single definition of happiness.

An individual’s quality of life is affected by a range of important factors. Socially, friends, family, and a spouse are all essential for someone to feel a sense of belonging and to feel loved.  People also need to be given status and esteem, which may be obtained through material wealth, an important job, or power and responsibility. Finally, people need to feel that they are constantly improving themselves and progressing with their life in a meaningful way. At some level, most people must meet each of these needs to some extent in order to feel happy.

In conclusion, happiness is impossible to define due to its subjective nature, although the standard of living is definitely a less satisfactory definition than quality of life. It is also determined by a mixture of factors, with priority given to each of these depending on the individual. Of these factors, the main ones required by most people are meeting their social needs, achieving an acceptable level of social status, and feeling that their lives are constantly improving.

Sample 21:

Each and every animal feels certain emotions when they are elated, ecstatic, and thrilled. Humans address it as happiness and in today’s era it seems that happiness is difficult to define in words. This essay will address this particular aspect by throwing some light on the determinants of happiness that play a potent role in the lives of individuals. An individual needs to be aware of the fact that there are a number of layers to the aspect of happiness and further the presence of intimacy within the human emotions doesn’t define it in a simpler manner. There are a number of behaviorists, sociologists, and psychologists that have worked upon deriving a meaningful definition that is also conclusive for a human mind to be heard. However, this majorly depends upon several factors and is further influenced by a number of pretexts. In addition to that, happiness is a subjective feeling that is enjoyed by individuals. To elaborate this concept, we all are aware that we have a different set of measure scales and reasons to be happy. Thus, it is a very complicated task to define happiness. The determining elements of happiness vary from individual to individual. To quote an example, the happiness and gratitude that one experiences post hard work and dedication preparation for an exam and scoring well is a sign of happiness for an individual. However, on the other hand, individuals might embrace and feel happy for an excursion to unexplored places, and this acts as a determinant of happiness to them. Moreover, a child will be the happiest when he receives a bar of chocolate from their father. Even indulging in a deep conversation with someone who won’t judge you for your statements also acts as a determinant of happiness. To summarize with, the provision of the accurate definition of happiness is not a necessity as people don’t seek it. Everyone is changing their set of happiness by involving some activity or the other.

Sample 22:

It is the nature of individuals to stay happy and seek happiness as it is one of the leisures of life. While the aspect of happiness makes it difficult to describe, there are some of the common needs that we share in regard to our experiences towards achieving happiness. Thus, defining happiness is a very critical and challenging task as its definition varies from person to person. It also is not possible to fully enjoy or experience the same feeling as the person that is happy in their life, and we all possess our own set of passions that we derive pleasure from. For instance, there are individuals that drive a sense of happiness from earning a lot of money and achieving success in their life. However, on the other hand, there are individuals that look for happiness in the simplest aspects of life, such as absence of health issues and well-being of the family. There are a range of other feelings that are experienced alongside the emotion of happiness, this ranges from peace to excitement. This range of emotion seems to be associated with the idea of happiness for some individuals and thus, it might make the same person feel happy in a number of different ways. Thus, there are complexities faced when one sets out to define happiness. Happiness has some set of basic preconditions that come attached to it. There are reasons such as lack of appropriate and safe living space that might ame an individual feel sad and further they might feel disgusted at being unable to afford food for themselves. Thus, to achieve a state of happiness, one must fulfill their basic needs. To conclude with, I would like to mention that happiness differs from the perspective of an individual and thus, defining it won’t be an appropriate act. Thus, we should let it be a concept that people experience whenever they come across something good in their life.

Sample 23:

In today’s era, people are dealing with an increased amount of competition and challenges, thus, achieving a state of happiness has become one of the major issues in the lives of individuals. Happiness can be defined in a different manner by different individuals as they all have their own perspective towards it. This essay will be exploring these aspects and addressing the fact that happiness cannot be defined easily and there are a number of factors that influence the approach of an individual towards happiness. The needs of individuals vary from person to person. Thus, unsatisfied needs of individuals lead to stimulating a negative emotion within them thus suppressing the act of happiness. However, once the individual is able address their set of needs, they might be able to experience the emotion of happiness within them. Thus, it can be mentioned that happiness is an outcome that is experienced post meeting the satisfactory needs of individuals. However, the modes of people perceiving happiness differ from individual to individual and define the quality of happiness for them. In addition to that, happiness from eras to come has been defined as a state of mind. For example, a wealthy person might be the happiest due to the presence of everything that he/she needs, however, a poor person must be cursing themselves for having a miserable life. Thus, it is evident that one has to deal with a number of determiners related to happiness. To summarize, I would like to conclude that happiness depends upon the attitude of individuals and their set of perceptions.

Sample 1:

Many students are made to attend certain classes when they are 15 years of age, while others are required to learn various subjects before leaving school. Although an education system with a broad range of subjects can provide diverse knowledge, with a narrower range is better as learners have more time for other activities desired.

Those supporting the former education system may claim that students can access a wider range of knowledge that they may need in their later life. Having a chance to attend many classes, students are taught numerous lessons related to various fields, many of which can be of great help when they grow up. For instance, in Vietnam, students aiming at engineering courses in university are only required to have good grades in Maths and Physics. However, the knowledge they have acquired in non-major classes like English or Computer Science can offer them a competitive edge when they apply for a job in a multinational company, compared to those who are not familiar with foreign languages or computers.

On the other hand, students who study only a few subjects have more time for other purposes than those studying so many. With fewer subjects to learn, they have extra time either for stress relievers such as playing some sport or taking a rest or for further research related to their chosen subjects. The former activity helps students relieve pressure at school and recharge their energy, whereas the latter is a good way of reviewing the lesson taught in class. Scientifically, these activities increase their study efficiency and academic performance, so such an education system is much better than that forcing students to learn various subjects.

In conclusion, although the knowledge learnt in various classes is potentially helpful, I believe that a study program with not so many classes is more beneficial to students who can have more time for deeper study or relaxation.

Sample 2:

The educational focuses for students from the age of 15 vary across educational systems, with some prioritizing an in-depth coverage of a limited number of subjects, and others spreading the focus on many subjects across the board. Compared to the former methodology, I believe that the holistic approach would prove more beneficial.

On the one hand, there are two main reasons why a number of educational systems narrow the scope of study to merely several core subjects for mid-teens. Firstly, the early concentration provides students with practical preparation for the university major and the career they aspire to pursue after leaving school. Without such a focus, students would have to divide their attention for a wide range of subjects, many of which do not seem to have any direct relevance to their prospective career. Secondly, it can help bridge the knowledge and skill gaps that an economy may have. For example, computer science, architecture and engineering are the disciplines which have yet to attract enough of a talent pool in Vietnam, and the focus on these areas for Vietnamese high schoolers is doing its job to gradually fill the gap.

On the other hand, I believe that it is more advisable for 15-year-old-and-above students to follow a more holistic curriculum. Firstly, these students should be given the opportunity to explore a broad range of subjects instead of following a standardized one-size-fits-all group of subjects at school. At the age of 15, most students are too young to decide the major they want to pursue, not to mention that their desire can swing halfway. Therefore, broad coverage in this sense could give them more time to explore themselves and identify which discipline would suit them best. Moreover, on an economy-wide scale, given the rapidly changing economic landscape, it is hard to predict with accuracy which kinds of knowledge would be of the essence in the future. Accordingly, students with a well-rounded preparation at school could gain a competitive advantage over those who do not. Lastly, hardly any profession nowadays exists in isolation, so a wider repertoire of acquired knowledge during school means they can deal with their future job more flexibly and resourcefully. 

In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that the adoption of a comprehensive educational program for learners after 15 years old could bring more significant benefits compared to a restricted curriculum.

Sample 3:

In certain parts of the world, high school students are required to study a wide array of subjects whereas in some other regions, a narrower teaching scope is preferred. Either educational paradigm offers its own distinct benefits, yet I consider the latter to be the better system.

An education system comprised of a huge number of subjects is often believed to provide students with solid foundations of different natural and societal concepts. For example, a 6th grader in Vietnam is supposed to study around 12-13 subjects, which cover a very wide range of thematic areas, in the hope that at the end of the academic year, they are able to be decent at doing maths, carrying out some basic scientific experiments, and understanding key notions of history and literature. In a sense, this can be beneficial if all of the aspects are well taught, and students’ knowledge is well retained up until they graduate from high school at the age of 15.

However, I would argue that an emphasis on a certain number of subjects is a better educational approach, as it relieves students’ study pressure and allows for greater learning focus. School examinations designed for such an education system are often unnecessarily stressful, and it is not rare to encounter cases of students contemplating suicide for failure to do well in tests.

Moreover, more time spent on some particular subjects results in better knowledge retention and skill mastery. Teenagers who have a gift for music, for example, may end up becoming much better musicians in their future career if they can allocate more time doing rehearsals than being forced to memorise large amounts of information for examinations.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that students can reap greater benefits from an education system which includes a certain number of academic disciplines. In the 21st century when professionalism and personal development are highlighted, such a paradigm will be embraced by more and more educational reformers.

Sample 4:

Many educational reformers today incline towards a narrower curriculum for students 15 and older. In my opinion, while this is part of a decidedly modern movement for early specialisation, a wide range of knowledge serves as a basis for more well-adjusted adults.

Limiting subjects from the age of 15 onwards can allow for greater focus. It is not uncommon for many children to choose one musical instrument or participate in a single sport from the beginning of grade school. The rationale is that more time spent in one domain inevitably leads to mastery and this is supported by research into the importance of practice for elite performers. There are many famous examples of individuals who focused from their teenage years onwards and found success such as The Beatles’ band members with music and Steve Jobs with computer technology. Fewer subjects after age 15 is therefore one way to safeguard a child’s future.

However, the famous examples above are belied by the bulk of research that shows, for the majority of individuals, a wide range of skills and interests is a better predictor of future success. Studies have overwhelmingly shown that varied skills allow for increased creativity and a more even temperament. The average high school student must study obviously useful subjects such as math and various disciplines of science but also take music, art, home economics, and choose their own electives. They may never become professional musicians but opening up that side of their brain can help them be more creative in another field and feel their education is well-rounded. Without dabbling in these allegedly useless subjects, they might feel harnessed to a single career and purpose, unable to exercise autonomy over their own life.

In conclusion, studying a range of subjects after the age of 15 leads to better results in general. A complete syllabus furnishes happier individual citizens and contributes to a richer overall society.

Sample 5:

Currently, numerous education systems have operated specialized learning programs for students at the age of 15. However, some people argue that students need to study a variety of subjects until leaving school. From my viewpoint, albeit offering certain benefits, an extensive curriculum is still inferior to a specialized one for high-school students.

On the one hand, studying a wide range of subjects can be advantageous for older schoolchildren in some aspects. First and foremost, students can acquire extensive knowledge for comprehensive personal development. As they learn multiple subjects at school from mathematics and physics to literature and geography, their background knowledge will be broadened considerably. This will enable them to have a multi-dimensional outlook on life and solve problems in numerous fields. In addition, learning various subjects until high-school graduation allows students more time to choose their specialization more meticulously. Since choosing one’s own specialized field for future jobs is a complicated matter, having more time means that students can experience more subjects and ultimately make the most. appropriate decision for their future specialization.

However, I concur that concentrating on a smaller range of subjects can bring more benefits to students from the age of 15. To begin with, studying only a subset of subjects at school provides students with greater motivation. Should students be allowed to choose the subjects they yearn for, they will put more dedication to studying, thus heightening their overall learning productivity in lieu of having to focus on other subjects they are not interested in. Furthermore, specializing in certain subjects from the age of 15 assists pupils to have higher likelihood of success in their future jobs. Studying early correlates with more time to develop technical understanding and relevant skills for the chosen domains. With such firm groundwork for future employment, these students will reap the competitive edge in both specialist knowledge and hands-on experience, allowing them to land a job and move up the career ladder more easily.

In conclusion, although studying wide-ranging subjects can be favorable to students to some extent, students will derive more benefits from a specialized curriculum from the age of 15. Nevertheless, this educational approach should be implemented in accordance with a tactful orientation program for students below this age so that the policy can bring the optimal outcome for all. 

Sample 6:

In many parts of the world, students are made to attend classes of various academic subjects, while in some other regions, school curricula only comprise a limited number of subjects. Either educational paradigm offers its own merits, yet I believe a narrower teaching scope is much more beneficial for students’ sake.

On the one hand, advocates of teaching children a wide spectrum of subjects may claim that students will be provided with concrete foundations of different natural and societal concepts. For example, as 8th graders in Vietnam are required to attend 12 subjects which cover a wide spectrum of theory and application, they are capable of justifying physical phenomena, carrying out scientific experiments, and performing art. In this sense, a school system with a wide array of academic disciplines provides young learners with a broader understanding and perspective, preparing those versatile individuals well for their future life.

On the other hand, students who learn only a few specific subjects can save more time for other pursuits.  Having fewer subjects to study, students are granted the opportunities to either participate in stress-relieving activities, such as swimming or skating, or specialize in their subjects of interest. The former can allow young learners to recharge their energy, while the latter can be of great help for those who want to work in academia in their later life. In fact, such activities have been proven to boost their academic performance, making this education system better than making students learn a variety of subjects.

In conclusion, although broad and holistic curricula can equip students with a greater understanding of their surroundings, I strongly believe that students can reap greater benefits from school systems with an emphasis on certain subjects. 

Sample 1:

Some people believe that countries should produce their own food for their citizens and reduce the amount of food that is imported. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.

There are several reasons why a country should produce its own food for its population, one of which is the creation of more jobs. When the demand for domestically produced food grows within a country, there will be more job opportunities available for local people in farming and food processing industries, leading to a reduction in unemployment rates. Secondly, it may be easier to control food quality when it is produced domestically, as authorities can easily monitor farms and food processing plants, in order to maintain safe, hygienic food standards.

Additionally, food imports should be reduced due to a number of reasons. Firstly, putting barriers on importing food can help to boost a country’s economy by eliminating the competition that local companies face with foreign products, allowing them to be more profitable and contribute to the national economy. Furthermore, food importation can have negative environmental impacts due to the large amounts of carbon emissions released from the transportation of products all around the world via planes, trucks, and ships. By reducing food imports, countries can play their part in helping to protect the environment, rather than contributing to environmental issues such as climate change.

In conclusion, I believe that each country should invest in the development of its agricultural industry to provide food for the population itself and import as little as possible.

Sample 2:

There are some who believe that countries should be self-sufficient in terms of their food production. This essay disagrees with such a suggestion, due to the potential benefits that food trade brings to all parties involved. These benefits, including effective allocation of resources, improved political atmosphere, and cultural appreciation, will be analysed below.

Food trade maximizes the effective allocation of resources, as it encourages specialization of production. Due to different resource endowments, each country is effective at producing different food items. If they can import, nations can focus on producing their most efficient goods, then trade excess items with other countries. Otherwise, nations would need to reallocate resources to produce what they are not efficient at, driving up the costs of production and causing their citizens to suffer from inflated food prices. An example of this situation is the Common Agricultural Policy used by the European Union, which subsidizes European farmers’ food production. If the EU had imported food from more efficient foreign farmers, the subsidy money could be used elsewhere or saved, while food prices are still manageable.

In addition, foreign trade creates interdependence between parties involved. As national leaders must take into consideration the impact of political decisions on food trade and commerce, they are less likely to turn to hostile acts that might provoke animosity and lead to war. Thus, this improves the global political atmosphere. Moreover, speaking from consumers’ perspective, food trade brings about more diversity and appreciation for other cultures in terms of their cuisine. An example of this is the popularity of sushi and other Japanese rolls in Western countries, giving rise to the Californian roll – a unique food combination that symbolizes the unique, global world we live in today.

To reiterate, countries should not attempt to produce all food for their entire population, as trade plays an important role in promoting effective resources allocation, global peace, and cultural appreciation.

Sample 3:

The question of whether or not states should be self-sufficient in food production has long been the centre of intense debate, with some believing that countries should produce all foodstuff themselves. Personally, I do not believe states could and should be self-sufficient, since although this can have some positive economic effect e.g. a positive trade balance, it can also bring with it the instability of famines.

Firstly, a country producing its own food has the benefit of reducing the amount it spends on imports, which has a positive effect economically in the long term. This is a huge consideration in nation-states that are still importing more than they are exporting, for money is technically flowing out of the country. This is why countries such as the USA, despite being the most powerful country in the world economically, still rely on a strong agricultural industry in order to keep their trade balance.

On the other hand, food self-production can often lead to famines, for weather conditions can make or break a harvest. In the past, when countries grew their own crops and international trade was far lower, famines were much more frequent as there was more risk involved: a season of bad weather would mean a famine that could last year-round. Importing food from a variety of countries would minimize the risk incurred by fluctuating weather patterns, since risks to crops are more geographically spread out.  

Overall, I argue that though there are economic benefits to having a country making its own food, the nature of the modern globalized economy means that in the long run, countries might find it much more beneficial to import their food from overseas.  

Sample 4:

Ensuring food adequacy for the entire population has been a major concern for nations throughout the centuries. Some people believe that the government should focus on producing all kinds of food while importing as little as possible to ensure food sufficiency. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort in terms of ensuring the nation’s food security.

Firstly, the more a country relies on imported food, the more food crises it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other charges that eventually increase the food price. To tackle this problem, a government should allocate more budgets to improve national production by maximising the collaboration of research centres with farmers. Related university courses and diploma programmes can create more talented individuals who would be involved in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all kinds of food items, a country can prepare for the rainy days.

Secondly, by focusing on farming, irrigation and planting, a government can decrease unemployment problems. For example, in Indonesia, the farming sector creates the highest percentage of jobs. More than 50 per cent of Indonesians are directly or indirectly depends on the agriculture sector.

Finally, imported food does not have the same quality and freshness as locally produced food and crops. If food is imported from a long distance, the food value degrades and, in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the imported food. Thus, the local production of foods would ensure better food quality and sound health of citizens.

In conclusion, preventing the food crisis, ensuring better food quality and decreasing unemployment could be achieved if a country becomes self-sufficient in its food production. It is expected that countries would emphasize their domestic food production as it gives many competitive advantages over importing.

Sample 5:

Every country wants to reduce its dependency on imports while maximising its exports including items such as food and crops. However, not all countries have the same geographic location, weather condition, technology and suitable lands to produce each type of crop the citizens need. This is why a country should focus more on its overall economic growth rather than using manpower and budget to become self-reliant on food.

To commence with, soil, weather condition, available lands, technology and demographics of a county determine what crops, vegetables and fruits it can produce. Not all countries have the same geographical features and manpower, and thus, it is obvious that the country needs to import some of the items. In many cases, this is more advantageous than producing or growing crops and then harvesting the grains. For instance, it is impossible for an Arab country to produce all types of foods due to its weather condition. If they focus on growing these food items and engage their manpower to do that, their economic growth would be hindered.

Moreover, a country like Germany and China can focus on manufacturing and industrial innovation while import food from other countries. The ultimate outcome is more beneficial for them. However, this might not be the case for a country that solely depends on the agriculture sector and where a majority of its population is already dependant on it. They can focus on improving their productions, but this model is not suitable for industrial countries.

To conclude, I believe that free trade and globalisation have made the world a global village. And with the speedy transportation system, food import costs have already declined. Since fulfilling the mass people's diverse needs for various kinds of food is not feasible for a country, it should focus on its true potential rather than allocating budget and manpower to become self-dependent on food.

Sample 6:

Ensuring adequate food for the whole population was a significant concern for nations throughout the centuries. Many people believe that the government should concentrate on producing all kinds of food while minding as little as possible to ensure all taxpayers’ buying capacities. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort concerning ensuring the country’s food safety.

Firstly, the greater a country depends on imported food, the greater the food crisis it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other fees that eventually increase the food price. To handle this issue, a government should allocate more funds to improve national production by assessing faculty and research lab alliance. Therefore, this idea may produce more gifted people who would participate in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all types of food items, a nation can prepare for its rainy times.

Secondly, by focusing on farming, planting and irrigation, a government can reduce unemployment problems. Greater than 50 percent of Indonesian are directly or indirectly is dependent on the agriculture industry.

Lastly, imported food does not have the quality and freshness that locally produced one can offer. If food is imported from a long distance, the food worth degrades, and in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the food. Thus, the local manufacturing of meals would ensure better food quality and solid health of taxpayers.

In summary, preventing the food crisis, ensuring greater food quality, and decreasing unemployment problems could execute if a nation becomes self-explanatory in their food production. Massively producing all sorts of foods is a great effort that the government could pick and take advantage of.

Sample 7:

Every nation wants to decrease its dependence on importing while wishing to increase its export things, and food is not an exception. However, not all nations have identical geographical characteristics, weather conditions and appropriate lands to create every kind of food the taxpayers want. That is why a nation should concentrate more on its general financial expansion than using budget and workforce to turn into self-reliant food, despite a few people’s contradictory views.

To start with, dirt, climate condition, accessible demographics and lands of a county decides what fruits and crops it can create. Not all nations have the exact geographical attribute and workforce, so many things inevitably require importing. Frequently, importing is quite beneficial compared to generating it. For example, an Arab state cannot create all kinds of meals because of its weather illness. Should they concentrate on growing those food items and participating in their human resources to do so, their economic development would diminish.

Furthermore, a nation like Germany and China can concentrate on the industrial and manufacturing invention during import food from different nations. The best result is much more valuable for them. Nevertheless, this may not be the situation for a nation that solely depends upon the agriculture industry, and the vast majority of its inhabitants are already dependant on it. They can concentrate on enhancing its creation, but this version is not appropriate for industrial nations.

Since fulfilling the bulk of people’s varied needs for several types of meals is impossible for a nation, it must concentrate on its true capacity instead of devoting funding and workforce to turn into self-dependent on meals.

Sample 8:

Many people suggest that a country should prioritize self-sufficiency in food production and minimize its reliance on imported food. I am inclined to agree with this perspective. This essay will explore the reasons behind this viewpoint and provide examples to support the argument.

Firstly, achieving self-sufficiency in food production enhances a country’s food security. By relying on domestic production, a nation can ensure a stable and consistent food supply for its population, reducing vulnerability to external factors such as trade disruptions, price fluctuations, or geopolitical tensions. For instance, countries like Japan and South Korea, with limited arable land and a high population density, have prioritized self-sufficiency to safeguard against potential food shortages and maintain a reliable food system.

Moreover, promoting domestic food production stimulates the growth of the agricultural sector and supports rural economies. When a country invests in agricultural infrastructure, technology, and training, it creates employment opportunities and income sources for farmers and agricultural workers. This, in turn, fosters economic development and reduces rural-urban migration. For example, countries like the Netherlands and Denmark have implemented advanced agricultural practices and achieved high levels of self-sufficiency, resulting in thriving rural communities and a strong agricultural sector.

In conclusion, prioritizing self-sufficiency enhances food security, supports rural economies, and promotes environmental sustainability. Countries that have embraced this approach have reaped the benefits of a stable food system, vibrant agricultural sectors, and reduced ecological impact. Therefore, governments should encourage and invest in domestic food production to secure the well-being of their populations and foster sustainable development.

Sample 9:

In recent years the topic of food sovereignty has become a pressing issue for many nations. It is a commonly held belief that countries should prioritise being self-sufficient by producing all the food necessary for their citizens instead of importing it. Although this viewpoint has its merits, I believe that this is not a feasible or beneficial option.

To begin, utilising local food production will enhance a country's national security, as this will prevent international disputes that may occur over pricing and other financial issues related to importing goods, such as taxes and other costs. In addition, local food production will promote sustainable agricultural practices according to a country's regional climates, which will preserve local biodiversity.

However, it must be noted that this method might not be beneficial for all nations, as not every country possesses arable land or a climate that is conducive to cultivating a variety of produce. For example, countries in colder parts of the world would not have access to tropical fruits like mangoes or bananas. Therefore, importing food is vital to provide a variety of food items as well as ensuring that certain items are available even during off seasons or other times of shortage. I also believe that being exposed to food items from other countries can add to our cultural diversity and enrich our culinary experiences.

In conclusion, while it might be beneficial for some nations to strive for food self-sufficiency, for many others this approach is unrealistic and could deprive a large part of the world of the broader benefits of global trade. Therefore, a balanced combination of domestic production and imports would be a more suitable option.

Sample 10:

Most people think a nation should be self-sufficient in growing its crops for its entire population, thereby reducing the goods from overseas to as little as possible. However, I disagree with it for two significant reasons, and in the following few paragraphs, I will explain them.

To begin with, each crop requires an ideal climate and soil for growth; therefore, it is impossible to produce every type of consumption product in one country. For example, apples need cold weather to grow, and therefore, Eastern desert countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc., will have to import them from other apple-producing countries. There are still many fruits, vegetables, and grains that cannot be grown in deserts. Hence, relying on minimal homegrown crops would not be practical. Therefore, a country must depend on other nations for food commodities.

In addition, if imports are reduced, there would be a price hike for locally produced crops. This is because product quantities available locally would be lower, and subsequently, the price would also soar due to high demand. It would result in no profit for anyone. As a result, most countries import items to stabilize the economy.

In conclusion, it is argued by most people that a country must produce its food for the entire nation. However, I firmly believe that importing is necessary as different crops require various environmental factors to grow, and fewer imports would result in a rise in the cost of commodities.

Sample 11:

Some people argue that countries should depend on domestic rather than imported produce to feed their population. I completely agree with this point of view because if they don't, low-income people might face hunger, and agricultural workers might lose their jobs.

A country's over-reliance on global markets for food can put people on low incomes at risk of starvation. This is because it does not have complete control over the food supplied by these markets. For example, if flooding hits the rice production of Thailand and Vietnam, the two biggest rice exporters to China, its supply would decrease dramatically. The price in turn might increase to the point at which the poor would be unable to afford it. This might lead to hunger since rice is a staple food in China.

In addition, the more food a country imports, the higher the unemployment rate among its farm workers. Countries that mainly rely on domestically grown produce to feed their population usually have a robust agricultural industry. This means there are many jobs available for farm workers: they can be hired to grow crops or raise animals for slaughter. If these countries switched to food imports, there would be large employment losses in farming. Therefore, farmworkers would be struggling to earn an income since it is very unlikely that they have the skills needed to work in another sector.

In conclusion, countries should encourage homegrown production and not just depend on uncertain global markets for food. Otherwise, people with low incomes may suffer hunger and the jobless rates for farmworkers may rise.

Sample 12:

In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population. However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country cannot stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.

Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential. For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries that cannot be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade. 

Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture. Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises. 

In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalised world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.

Sample 13:

Many today are increasingly of the opinion that countries should be self-sufficient in their food production and import as little as possible. Though I grant this is unrealistic in certain countries, the economic implications are convincing.

In most countries, imported foods are simply a luxury but this belies those nations where imports ensure survival. Some of these countries include populous Southeast Asian nations, and numerous Middle Eastern and African countries. The reasons range from poorly developed infrastructure, little arable soil, and increased vulnerability to natural disasters. Many Asian countries in particular, import and stockpile basic foods such as rice for potential catastrophes. As agricultural technology develops and allows for crops that require less water, their desperation will lessen but it would be inhumane today to starve citizens in these countries.

The above-mentioned scenarios are exceptions; the majority of countries would be better served through vibrant food cultivation and production industries. The economic impact is twofold. First, these industries employ thousands of agricultural and meat-packing workers. Secondly, these workers then contribute to the local economy by buying goods and services. Replace them with international food conglomerates and suddenly they are funding the GDP of another country. A good counter-example to this would be in South Korea where the vast majority of products are nationally produced and, in fact, were some of the initial, primary sources of income for technology giants like Samsung and LG.

In conclusion, except in extreme cases, countries should import fewer food products to better serve their citizenry economically. There will always be a place for a limited range of imports, but it should not supersede local production.

Sample 14:

People have different views as to whether countries should import less food and, instead, try to produce all of their food locally. In my opinion, countries should continue to import food normally.

On one hand, producing food locally helps support the local economy. Money spent on these domestic products ends up in the hands of local farmers and distributors, keeping the money within a country instead of having it flow to foreign countries. Another benefit is that local food is often fresher and healthier than imported food, which is typically frozen so that it can be transported across the world. Moreover, these transportation costs are passed down to customers, making imported food considerably more expensive than local food. Transporting food across countries also harms the environment, as food miles contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Producing local food, in other words, helps curb climate change.

However, I still believe that countries should continue to import food as they normally do. First, imported food can be safer and of higher quality than local food, and it would be wrong to deny people food safety. Imported food also provides people with a greater variety of options. For example, many types of cheese, meat, and fruit are produced only in foreign countries. Being able to buy these foods results in a happier and more content general population. Additionally, importing food grants people access to food that is out of season in their country. It allows people, for instance, to enjoy mangoes all-year round instead of just during summer when they're in season.

For these reasons, I would argue that countries should continue to import food normally instead of trying to replace it with locally produced food.

Sample 15:

It is suggested that a country should avoid importing food and meet all of its demands with national production. From my perspective, this idea should never be implemented in practice.

The most common argument for food autarky is to maintain food security. Food, unlike other types of goods, is essential for human survival; a mass shortage of food in just a few days will lead to riots. Therefore, ensuring food supply independent from import supply seems reasonable; however, this line of thought is not without a flaw. In reality, a food crisis can be the result of natural disasters; tying the whole country's food demand with domestic supply is actually risky. An example is the North Korea famine during the 90s, which happened due to a series of droughts and the lack of imported food. In practice, a good network of food trade reduces the risk of national famine.

Another reason for not importing food is protectionism, or in other words, restricting imports in order to shield the domestic industry from competition. Protectionists argue that without tariffs on imported goods, many imported products are cheaper than their domestic counterparts. Consumers usually pick the cheaper ones, this causes local firms to be unable to sell their products and lose their revenue, making local workers lose their jobs. However, this argument overlooks the bilateral aspect of international trade. If a country insists on exporting but not importing anything from its foreign partners, every nation will eventually adopt the same strategy. Many workers will lose their jobs if there is no market for their products. Therefore, protectionism does not necessarily prevent unemployment.

In conclusion, it is best practice to let the market dictate the import flow.

Sample 16:

It is believed that nations should grow crops themselves to feed their residents, and imports should be reduced to a large extent. This essay agrees with this statement because this initiative will make food items cheaper and improve the financial status of farmers.

Firstly, the food items grown in the nation will be much more affordable for its citizens. This is because grains produced in the nation do not need to pay the international transportation cost and other international charges. As a result, the price of locally grown food will much lower. For example, in South-east nations, they import much of their wheat and rice from other nations and thus the cost of these food grains is quite higher in these nations as compared to other parts of the world.

Secondly, when governments push their residents to produce more grains for domestic consumption, it is more likely that the income of local farmers will increase. This is because all crops that they grow will be sold in the local food markets either purchased by the government agencies or private companies. This will enable farmers to earn a good amount of money. To illustrate, in India, the government procures grains from farmers at a minimum support price and thus this has enabled farmers to have an assured income for their work and have a decent lifestyle.

In conclusion, domestically grown food products will result in lowering the prices of food items and it will raise the economic status of the farming community.

Sample 17:

It is commonly suggested that food grown by the nations should satisfy the needs of all their citizens and imports must be curbed as much as possible. I completely agree with this point of view as this will help countries to save money and create many opportunities for the residents.

One of the biggest benefits of producing food in-house is that it can financially favor the governments. Becoming self-sufficient in food production and minimizing imports makes the country less dependent on others and at the same it benefits local producers. This will also give the upper hand in trade-related decisions with other nations. Moreover, food grown in the country will have lower base prices as it becomes a regular item in people’s diet. For example, 30 years ago, India was totally dependent on foreign countries for wheat and then wheat prices were high. However, now the country produces enough wheat for its people and prices have fallen by 50%. Thus, domestic production of foods benefits national economies.

Additionally, the idea of growing food to fulfill the country’s demand will create many opportunities for their people to grow. This will create higher employment in this sector and will motivate the researchers to develop new technologies. For instance, the state of Punjab created 30% more jobs for its residents since the time it started to lead the nation in the production of wheat. Furthermore, the state government was able to allocate more resources to the research and development making wheat much more affordable to the people of India.

In conclusion, the idea of growing food that can fulfil the need of the country and curtailing imports is entirely justified. This will not only make the country financially strong but also generate more employment opportunities employment and elevate its technological capacities in the long run.

Sample 18:

There exists an opinion that each country should ensure its food security as per the food demands of its population rather than relying heavily on other countries. I too think the same way, despite some strong exceptions.

The primary reason for my view is because of the fact that many countries across the world face food shortage, though they are capable of being independent in case of meeting the food demands. This might be due to changing the focus of development from the agricultural sector to other sectors like tourism and infrastructure. Admitting the fact that development is needed in all the sectors, I think a country should never deviate its focus from food produce, as it is one of the basic needs of mankind.

In many countries, hectares of agricultural lands are converted to either residential or industrial areas, and they depend heavily on food imports. The most undesirable situation might arise when there occurs a shortage in these imports due to any unforeseen events like natural calamities or war. In such a case, the citizens of the dependent countries might suffer severe food shortage or even famine. In order to avoid such incidences, it is better to produce and store enough food items a country’s population demands.

However, there are countries where extreme climatic conditions are present. For example, it is difficult to meet the food demands of middle east countries, as the area suitable for agriculture is too less, compared to other countries. The situation is similar in the case of countries where frequent floods and droughts occur. The modern technology is not yet fully developed to solve these issues.

In conclusion, even though adverse conditions hamper the food production process in certain countries, I think a country should ensure minimum food imports by promoting cultivation of edible food products, whenever and wherever possible.

Sample 1:

In the past, valuable knowledge was predominantly stored in books. However, with the advent of modern technology, people now utilize the Internet as a primary repository for knowledge. This essay argues that the advantages of this shift significantly outweigh the disadvantages.

On one hand, the transition to online knowledge storage presents certain challenges with the most significant being the risk of plagiarism and information theft. Regarding the former, the ease of copying and altering content online can lead to widespread academic dishonesty. An example of this is how many students misuse readily available resources to produce work that is not their own, undermining academic integrity. In terms of information circulation, unauthorized distribution of intellectual property poses another serious concern. Books and academic papers are often shared without the author's consent, infringing on intellectual property rights and negatively impacting authors' revenue. Despite these challenges, advancements in technology have provided effective solutions. Sophisticated plagiarism detection software and restrictive digital rights management tools have been developed to address these issues. In addition to these programs, increased awareness and educational campaigns have contributed to better protection of intellectual property.

From my perspective, the benefits of storing knowledge online are more substantial and far-reaching compared to the aforementioned downsides. One of the most significant advantages is accessibility. The Internet indeed transcends geographical barriers, allowing individuals from any location to access a reservoir of resources and research worldwide. For example, a student in Vietnam can now access scholarly articles from leading Western universities with ease, which was virtually impossible in the past due to physical distance and limited availability of resources. Furthermore, online materials are generally more affordable than printed books. E-books and digital articles often cost significantly less, making them accessible to a broader audience. This increased accessibility and affordability empower learners to acquire knowledge more readily and at a lower cost.

In conclusion, while there are notable concerns regarding plagiarism and unauthorized distribution of information online, these issues are being effectively addressed through technology and awareness. The considerable benefits of online knowledge storage, including enhanced accessibility and affordability, make it a superior alternative to traditional book-based storage. Therefore, the advantages of this development clearly outweigh its disadvantages.

Sample 2:

These days, books have been superseded by the Internet when it comes to knowledge storage. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this trend are greater than its benefits.

On the one hand, storing knowledge on the Internet is greatly beneficial. To begin with, the Internet allows people to access knowledge from an immense number of sources. With the help of search engines like Google or Firefox, internet users can explore content on various topics with a couple of mouse clicks. Therefore, they can get access to information immediately anywhere, which is cheaper, much more convenient and time-saving compared to looking for the same amount of knowledge from printed books. In addition, knowledge on the Internet is stored in different formats, which helps learners absorb the information more effectively. Unlike books, which present information in the form of texts or images only, the Internet provides learners with knowledge in both texts and digital forms like audio or videos. Auditory learners, for example, would find learning via podcasts, which are common on many websites, more useful than reading books.

On the other hand, I believe that storing knowledge on the Internet brings about more significant disadvantages. First, the reliability of information on the web is not guaranteed. Since anything can be posted on the Internet without verification, there are many unreliable sources which deliver inaccurate knowledge, making it hard for an average user to differentiate between true and false information. Moreover, digital piracy is another problem when it comes to online knowledge storage. The Internet has paved the way for the boom in copyright infringements in the last decade. Tons of websites are distributing pirated, free electronic books to increase their web traffic, which can help them earn money from running online advertisements. Such illegal distribution is difficult to control and causes the publishing industry to lose millions of dollars every year.

In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of storing knowledge online are outweighed by its drawbacks. 

Sample 3:

The shift from storing knowledge in books to utilizing the internet for this purpose has profoundly transformed the way we access and disseminate information. While there are valid concerns about the drawbacks of relying on digital sources, I believe the benefits significantly outweigh the disadvantages.

Opponents of digital knowledge storage argue that it can lead to issues such as information overload and reduced critical thinking. The internet is replete with vast amounts of information, not all of which is accurate or reliable. For example, students in Vietnam may encounter conflicting information when researching topics online, making it difficult to discern credible sources. Additionally, the ease of accessing information online can discourage deep, analytical thinking, as people may rely on quick searches instead of thorough study. However, these challenges can be mitigated through the development of digital literacy skills, which can help individuals evaluate and utilize online information effectively.

However, I believe that the advantages of storing knowledge on the internet are more substantial. Firstly, the internet offers unparalleled access to a vast array of information, making it easier for people to learn and share knowledge globally. In Vietnam, students and professionals can access academic papers, online courses, and global news instantly, which would be impossible with traditional books. Furthermore, the internet facilitates real-time updates, ensuring that the most current information is available. If knowledge were still primarily stored in books, it would be much harder to keep educational materials up-to-date, leading to potential gaps in knowledge.

In conclusion, while the shift from books to digital knowledge storage presents some challenges, the benefits of increased accessibility and the ability to stay current with information are significant. The development of digital literacy can address the drawbacks, allowing society to fully embrace the advantages of this transformation. Therefore, I believe that the positive aspects of storing knowledge on the internet far outweigh the negative ones.

Sample 4:

In the past, people primarily stored knowledge in books, which were considered the most reliable sources of information. However, with the advent of the internet, the way we store and access knowledge has undergone a significant transformation. While this development offers undeniable advantages, it also brings about certain disadvantages that should not be overlooked. This article will address the pros and downsides of this change, concluding that the former outweighs the latter.

One of the most significant advantages of storing knowledge on the internet is the ease of access. Unlike books, which require physical space and time to locate, the internet allows users to access vast amounts of information instantly with just a few clicks. This rapid access to knowledge has made learning and research more efficient and has democratized information, making it accessible to people all over the world, regardless of their location or financial status. Additionally, the internet enables the continuous updating of information, ensuring that users always have access to the most current data.

However, storing knowledge on the internet is not without its disadvantages. One of the primary concerns is the reliability of the information available online. Unlike books, which undergo rigorous editorial processes, online content can be created and shared by anyone, leading to the proliferation of misinformation. Furthermore, the dependence on technology for accessing knowledge can be problematic, particularly in situations where there is no internet access or when digital platforms experience technical failures. Lastly, there are significant privacy and security concerns, as personal information and intellectual property can be vulnerable to cyber threats.

In conclusion, while storing knowledge on the internet offers significant advantages in terms of accessibility and the ability to update information, it also presents challenges related to reliability, security, and dependence on technology. Despite these drawbacks, the benefits of this development, particularly in making knowledge more accessible and up-to-date, outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, it can be concluded that the shift from books to the internet as the primary storage of knowledge is a positive development overall.

Sample 5:

The way people store and access knowledge has evolved significantly over time. In the past, books were the primary medium for storing information, offering a tangible and reliable source of knowledge. However, with the advent of the internet, this paradigm has shifted dramatically. Today, knowledge is increasingly stored online, making it more accessible and dynamic. While this shift offers numerous advantages, it is essential to consider the potential drawbacks as well. This essay will look at both arguments and make the case that there are more benefits than drawbacks to preserving knowledge online.

One of the most prominent advantages of storing knowledge on the internet is the unparalleled accessibility it provides. Information that was once confined to physical libraries is now available to anyone with an internet connection, regardless of geographical location or economic background. This democratization of knowledge has empowered individuals and communities, allowing for greater educational opportunities and the rapid dissemination of information. Moreover, the internet enables the continuous updating and expansion of knowledge. Unlike books, which can become outdated, online resources can be revised in real-time, ensuring that users have access to the most current information available.

However, despite these advantages, there are notable disadvantages to consider. The most significant concern is the quality and reliability of information found on the internet. Unlike books, which are typically subjected to rigorous editorial processes, much of the content online is user-generated, leading to the spread of misinformation and biased perspectives. This can make it challenging for individuals to discern accurate information from falsehoods. Additionally, the digital divide remains a critical issue, as not everyone has equal access to the internet. This disparity can exacerbate existing inequalities, particularly in education. Furthermore, the overwhelming amount of information available online can lead to information overload, making it difficult for users to navigate and synthesize the vast resources effectively.

In conclusion, the shift from storing knowledge in books to the internet presents both significant advantages and notable disadvantages. While concerns about reliability and access remain, the benefits of increased accessibility, up-to-date information, and the democratization of knowledge are undeniable. Ultimately, the advantages of storing knowledge on the internet outweigh the disadvantages, as it allows for a more informed and connected global community. To maximize these benefits, it is crucial to develop strategies for improving digital literacy and ensuring equitable access to the internet for all individuals.

Sample 6:

It is a common trend for knowledge to be stored online rather than in physical books these days. Personally, I believe the benefits of this tendency mostly outweigh its drawbacks, as it contributes to the protection of the environment and the spread of information even though copyright violation can be an issue.

The foremost rationale for why I believe storing knowledge on the internet is beneficial relates to environmental concerns. This is because producing physical books generally generates a significant amount of carbon dioxide. This stems from the process of manufacturing paper, printing and distributing hard copies to readers. By contrast, the production of digital books is profoundly simpler, using a computer to create and upload files to websites, thus noticeably diminishing the total carbon footprint.

Another justification for my belief that online sources of information are more advantageous lies in their accessibility. As long as there is a device connected to the internet, people virtually everywhere can access the online pool of knowledge. An illustrative example of this is the Harvard online library. It provides millions of users around the world with rich academic resources, whereas only a few thousand readers who are currently at the university can benefit from its physical collections of books.

However, I acknowledge the risk of copyright violations. Numerous scholars have expressed their concerns about the illegal duplication of their research papers on popular sharing platforms such as Google Drive. They stress that these duplications are not only a direct violation of intellectual property laws but also a discouragement to those who have invested in researching new knowledge.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the advantages of online information sources carry more weight than the disadvantages considering their lower environmental costs and accessible nature despite the possibility of copyright breach. That is why schools should teach children to capitalise on these online sources, while governments should issue more stringent laws to protect the rights of innovative researchers and book writers.

Sample 7:

In recent years, it has witnessed an augmenting advancement of technology and an ability to access the internet without borders of space and time. Owing to these developments, people are using the Internet as an alternative to classic books, which once were the only source of knowledge, in order to store documents. From my view, the advantages of using the Internet as a high-quality source of knowledge are totally dominating the drawbacks it may contain.

On the grounds that the access to the Internet is apparent these days, knowledge stored on the Internet can be reached anywhere, anytime. First of all, the price for using the Internet is much cheaper than buying a book from the bookstores. All people need to search for information on the Internet is a portable device with Internet connection, such as a laptop or mobile phone connected to WIFI or LAN cable, which is mostly affordable, even free at public places. Furthermore, people can read not only one book or document at one time, but the accessibility to other books is ready at any time. Last but not least, online sources of information cannot be lost as long as the link to websites is still kept.  Compared to these features, books can only contain one content per book, and are quite expensive, especially for high quality books from well-known publishers. In addition, books can be lost, burnt, wet or damaged due to the destruction of time and the letters can fade over a period. 

The authentication of information may be the only aspect to concern when it comes to online sources of knowledge. By virtue of easy accessibility to the internet, posting a piece of document onto the world-wide-webs only takes up to 5 minutes, and it is not common that someone will legit check most of the documents. This phenomenon can give rise to misunderstanding in some circumstances. Besides, copyright issues are an utmost complex problem when it comes to verifying the reliance of online publishers. For instance, reference books such as Cambridge IELTS, Mindset IELTS or Complete IELTS book series from Cambridge are among the most sought for those who are intending to take the IELTS. Thus, there are many pdf files on the Internet for downloading these books without paying any fee. This has been accounting for a detrimental loss in income for publishers as they have invested a large amount of money in research and writing books.

In conclusion, storing knowledge online has undenied benefits that totally outweigh the disadvantages it may bring. Nonetheless, there should be actions to be taken in order to protect the rights of publishers as well as ensure only the truth will be delivered to readers.

Sample 8:

In the past, people stored knowledge in books, but nowadays, it is stored on the internet. This trend could have positive and negative consequences in equal measures.

On the one hand, storing knowledge on the internet offers numerous advantages. Firstly, the internet allows people to access knowledge from an immense number of sources. With the help of search engines like Google or Firefox, internet users can explore content on various topics with just a couple of mouse clicks. They can access information immediately anywhere, which is cheaper, much more convenient, and time-saving compared to searching for the same amount of knowledge in printed books. Additionally, knowledge on the internet is stored in different formats, which helps learners absorb the information more effectively. Unlike books, which present information in the form of texts or images only, the internet provides learners with knowledge in both texts and digital forms like audio or videos.

On the other hand, the reliability of information on the web is not guaranteed. Since anything can be posted on the internet without verification, there are many unreliable sources that deliver inaccurate knowledge, making it hard for an average user to differentiate between true and false information. In the realm of online research, encountering a website advocating for cancer cures through apple seeds highlights the pervasive issues of unverified content and fake news, emphasizing the importance of critically evaluating online information and relying on reputable sources for accurate knowledge. Furthermore, digital piracy is another problem when it comes to online knowledge storage. The internet has paved the way for the boom in copyright infringements in the last decade.

In conclusion, while the internet offers unprecedented access to a wide array of information in various formats, the potential for misinformation and digital piracy presents significant challenges.

Sample 9:

In the past, knowledge was primarily stored in books, but today it is predominantly stored on the internet. Despite the challenges this shift presents, the advantages of storing information online far outweigh the disadvantages.

Admittedly, storing knowledge on the internet can be problematic to some extent. One significant drawback of this method is the prevalence of misinformation. Unlike books, which undergo rigorous editing and fact-checking, online content can be published by anyone, leading to the spread of false information. For instance, during health crises, incorrect medical advice can quickly proliferate, causing harm. Another disadvantage is the digital divide, which restricts access to information for those without reliable internet connections or the necessary technological skills. For example, rural areas in developing countries often lack adequate internet infrastructure, leaving residents at a disadvantage.

However, the benefits of storing knowledge on the internet are more substantial. The first advantage is the unparalleled accessibility it offers. Information can be accessed from anywhere at any time, benefiting students, professionals, and curious minds globally. To illustrate, a student in a remote village can access world-class educational resources online, something that would be impossible with physical books alone. The second advantage is the ease of updating and expanding information. In contrast to books, which once printed remain static, online information can be continuously updated, ensuring users have access to the most current knowledge. For instance, online encyclopedias like Wikipedia are constantly revised to include the latest developments in various fields.

In conclusion, while there are notable downsides such as misinformation and the digital divide, the positive aspects of storing knowledge on the internet, including enhanced accessibility and the ability to keep information current, clearly outweigh these drawbacks.

Sample 10:

People used to rely on books as repositories of knowledge; however, the internet nowadays has largely taken over this role. This essay will argue that the benefits of this trend outweigh the downsides, despite some valid concerns.

One significant advantage of storing knowledge on the internet is the superior accessibility. Indeed, information can be accessed from virtually anywhere in the world at any time. This has democratized knowledge, allowing people from various socio- economic backgrounds to access information that was previously limited to those who could afford books or had access to well-stocked libraries. For instance, students in remote areas can now access academic journals, online courses, and a plethora of educational resources that enhance their learning experiences.

Another benefit is the interactivity and multimedia capabilities of the internet. Specifically, knowledge is not just stored in text form but also be presented through videos, podcasts, and interactive simulations. This variety caters to different learning styles and can make complex information more comprehensive and engaging. For example, a medical student can watch surgical procedures online, gaining insights that are difficult to capture in textbooks.

However, there are disadvantages to storing knowledge on the internet. One major concern is the reliability and credibility of information. Unlike books, which typically undergo rigorous evaluation and editorial processes, online content can be published by anyone, leading to the spread of misinformation.

In conclusion, while there are drawbacks to storing knowledge on the internet, such as the dissemination of inaccurate knowledge, the advantages largely prevail in terms of the hassle-free accessibility, and the multimedia capabilities of the internet. It is imperative for users to navigate this digital terrain with critical thinking skills and verify the authenticity of sources to avoid being misled by inaccurate information.

Sample 11:

Nowadays, people tend to store knowledge on the Internet rather than in books. From my point of view, I believe that the positives of this trend outweigh its negatives.

To start with, using the internet as a storage for knowledge has two great benefits. First, the internet provides people with quick and easy access to a great variety of information. Whereas in former times, people had to spend much time leafing through numerous pages in search of knowledge, modern people can look for different types of information with just a mouse click. Moreover, with the internet and the help of electronic devices, knowledge is accessible anytime and anywhere. To illustrate, even while running, people can still absorb information from podcasts or audio books, which would be impossible with traditional books. Moreover, the internet allows people to keep more diversified types of knowledge. Since the internet is capable of storing audios and videos, nowadays, films and musical legacies can be stored and shared with our future descendants with ease.

Beneficial as it is, storing knowledge online also causes two main problems. Firstly, internet users must be aware of fake news. As anyone can post anything online without verification and repercussions, loads of unreliable information awaits uninformed netizens and supplies them with inaccurate knowledge. This can be dangerous in case the information is health-related or law-related. Secondly, intellectual copyrights are at risk due to the boom of the internet. In recent years, due to how loose cyber laws are, the internet has become a tool for millions of websites to distribute pirated publications in exchange for advertising revenues. These copyright infringements inflict substantial losses on the publishing industry and discourage aspiring authors.

To sum up, although storing knowledge on the internet has many disadvantages, it also proves to be immensely advantageous in numerous cases.

Sample 12:

A book is the primary source of knowledge. But in this age of globalization, the scenario and meaning of knowledge and information are changing rapidly. Nowadays, books are stored online. We can say that physical publications are sort of neglected. I can say that this negligence has an overall negative impact despite a lot of conveniences.

Books are scanned and are uploaded on the internet, journals and research papers are published online. One who supports this trend can easily point out numerous advantages. Be it a poor student or be it a person using an iPhone - anybody can access any kind of book on the go if that person has an internet connection. On the internet, there is no such discrimination based on socio-economic and cultural status. Wikipedia, Internet Explorer and the almighty Google are always there to help one out in any situation. One can find suitable books on the internet just by searching by their name on the search bar. So, technically everyone is just a click away from accessing a book. Some books are even free online. One can just download it and share it with others in the blink of an eye.

On the other hand, this availability of online books increases our dependency on technology. It is harmful to the human body, brain, and eyes. If one becomes addicted to technology, it can gradually ruin his or her life. Previously people had more perseverance, they used to research on a topic thoroughly consulting books and making handwritten notes. But now almost everyone has a short attention span and is more attracted towards short articles and towards those engaging clicks on the screens. This obviously brings pleasure to the human mind but in the long term, it is going to harm the human mind.

To conclude, I can say that undoubtedly none can deny the handiness of books being available online, but I definitely doubt its effectiveness in the long term.

Sample 13:

It is a fact of modern life that most information today is stored online, rather than in physical books as it was in the past. In my opinion, this is a negative overall despite its obvious conveniences.

Supporters of this trend can point to the numerous ways knowledge kept online can be disseminated and used. Online information is almost universally accessible, narrowing socioeconomic differences in society and allowing for various conveniences. First of all, users can find relevant information on search engines from a wide range of sources including user-generated sites like Wikipedia to news outlets like The New York Times and academic journals as well. Once an individual locates the information they are looking for, it is also easier to search within that article, share it with others, have it wherever they go and store more than would be possible if it were a hard copy.

Nonetheless, storing information online encourages a dependence on computer technology that is harmful for the human mind. In the past, if a person wanted to research a given topic, they would have to check out a library book or talk with an expert. This process was much slower and open to the possibility of bias. However, it also meant that individuals were more conscientious and patiently learned from fuller, more nuanced sources. Nowadays, most people read short articles, hastily written to attract more clicks and generate advertising revenue. These tap into a fundamental human need to be constantly engaged and feeling pleasure. Over time, this has led to a generation addicted to devices, lacking the healthy habits engendered by careful research and study.

In conclusion, despite the handiness of online information, the impact on the human psyche makes this a negative trend on level. Individuals must themselves find ways to counter these potentially injurious effects.

Sample 14:

In the past, various knowledge was stored in books, preserved over time. Recent times prove that the Internet has gradually substituted books for this purpose. Although storing information online has some drawbacks, I believe the upside of this trend outweighs the downside.

The Internet is advantageous as a major medium of knowledge from various perspectives. First and foremost, the existence of ebooks terminated people’s need to carry heaps of printed books around while also allowing easy access anytime, anywhere from their compact devices. Secondly, searching for information has never been easier with the enormous amount of knowledge available online. The search engine technology also allowed people to quickly find the information they needed with a few clicks of hand, a drastic improvement in comparison with the tedious activity of searching through paper books contents. The most obvious example of such a search engine would be Google. Wikipedia, on the other hand, is an example of an open-source encyclopedia that provides the expertise of all fields. The quality of information on websites, however, is still an unsolved problem as the number of viruses and fake news keeps on increasing.

In comparison, using printed books also has its own merits. Firstly, they’re easier on the eyes whereas electronic books can cause screen fatigue as our eyes are strained for a long period of time. Moreover, It is scientifically proven that people are less likely to get distracted while reading paper books, and thus absorb more information. Plus, with a print book, it’s easier to go back and confirm details you may be unsure of without losing your place and having to scroll back on your device. Many readers will also miss the feel of books that they can hold and touch and leaf through whenever they please.

All in all, the internet outweighs books as a means of knowledge storage. Even then, we should not ignore the benefits brought by paper books and continue to distribute knowledge by both means.

Sample 15:

In recent years, due to the proliferation of technology, people have a growing tendency to keep information on the Internet instead of in printed books.

It has become a debatable topic whether this change has brought about more advantages or disadvantages. From my perspective, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks for several reasons, and this essay serves to give an insight into the situation.

On the one hand, supporters of this trend often claim that the merits coming from storing knowledge online are remarkable.

Firstly, there is no denying that accessing information on the Internet offers great convenience, which is crucial in today’s world of advanced technology. Whenever people are in need of finding information that serves particular purposes, instead of spending time finding the suitable books and correct chapters like in the past, with just a few clicks on any electronic devices connected to the Internet, they can precisely locate the answers they need in no time. Secondly, keeping data online is also considered a great way of protecting the environment, as it relieves the burden of printing books, which often led to mass deforestation in the past years. In modern times, technological advances have allowed readers to conveniently upload and download hundreds of gigabytes of data, which is equivalent to millions of books, helping to preserve trees all around the world.

On the other hand, although storing information on the Internet is advantageous, it also has certain drawbacks. In the past, publishers had to carefully examine information in books before printing and distributing them. However, nowadays, anyone can put information anywhere and anytime on the Internet, so there is a huge source of unreliable information, which could negatively impact the mindset of readers. This is not to mention that Internet users could suffer from viruses that harm their electronic devices.

An alarming concern is the quality of information that is circulating online. It is an actual fact that there are thousands of types of malicious softwares and programs that could be installed on the computers, phones or laptops of individuals and organizations without their consent when they click on suspicious links.

In conclusion, there is no denying that storing information on the Internet has both advantages and disadvantages. Nevertheless, I am personally convinced that the merits outweigh its demerits, as it is a much more convenient way to search for data and also plays a role in the preservation of wood used for printing books.

Sample 16:

The internet has revolutionized the way we access and store information, offering unprecedented advantages over traditional methods like books. While the internet provides a vast repository of knowledge, readily available at our fingertips, it also presents certain disadvantages. This essay will argue that the advantages of storing knowledge on the internet outweigh the disadvantages.

One of the most significant advantages of storing knowledge on the internet is its accessibility. Unlike books, which are physically limited and require physical access, the internet allows individuals to access information from anywhere with an internet connection. This accessibility fosters a more inclusive and democratic learning environment, breaking down barriers of geography and socioeconomic status. Moreover, the internet offers a vast and diverse range of information, encompassing various perspectives and sources. This diversity allows individuals to explore different viewpoints and develop a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues.

However, the internet also presents certain disadvantages. One concern is the potential for misinformation and the spread of unreliable information. The internet's vastness and lack of centralized control make it difficult to verify the accuracy and credibility of information. This can lead to the dissemination of false or misleading information, potentially impacting individuals' understanding of the world. Additionally, the internet's reliance on technology can create a digital divide, excluding individuals without access to technology or the necessary skills to navigate the online world.

Despite these disadvantages, the advantages of storing knowledge on the internet outweigh them. The accessibility, diversity, and dynamism of the internet provide unparalleled opportunities for learning and knowledge acquisition. While the potential for misinformation exists, critical thinking skills and media literacy can help individuals navigate the online world effectively. Furthermore, initiatives aimed at bridging the digital divide can ensure that everyone has access to the benefits of the internet.

In conclusion, the internet's ability to store and disseminate knowledge offers significant advantages over traditional methods. While concerns about misinformation and digital divides remain, the internet's accessibility, diversity, and dynamism make it an invaluable tool for learning and knowledge acquisition. By promoting critical thinking and addressing the digital divide, we can harness the internet's potential to create a more informed and empowered society.

 

Sample 1:

The debate surrounding the funding of performing arts education for children - whether it should be a governmental responsibility or supported by private sectors and families - is complex. This essay delves into both viewpoints before articulating a considered opinion on the matter.

Advocates for government intervention argue that state-funded arts programs ensure equitable access for all children, fostering a culturally enriched society. In Vietnam, for example, government support has played a crucial role in preserving traditional music and dance, integrating these art forms into the education system and thus maintaining cultural heritage among the youth. This state-sponsored approach ensures that arts education is not a privilege for the few but a right for the many. Nevertheless, the potential for complacency in government-funded institutions cannot be overlooked, as it might inhibit innovation due to a lack of competitive stimulus.

However, I contend that private and familial contributions towards the arts are indispensable. Such support not only relieves the fiscal pressure on the government but also promotes a merit-based artistic landscape. In Vietnam, private funding has been instrumental in bringing young artists to the forefront of the international stage, showcasing the effectiveness of personal investment in nurturing talent.

In conclusion, while government funding is vital for universal access to arts education, the engagement of private entities and family support is crucial for fostering a dynamic and innovative arts community. This dual approach ensures that the arts remain a vibrant part of our social fabric, enriching Vietnam's cultural identity and supporting the development of young talent across diverse socio-economic backgrounds. This blend of public and private funding models presents the most pragmatic path forward in cultivating and sustaining the arts as a pillar of cultural and societal growth.

Sample 2:

It is argued in the statement that government should contribute to music, dance and arts learning of the children whereas many others think that it is the responsibility of parents or local organisations to support these programs. In my opinion, the above-mentioned subjects should be aided by the concerning and governing bodies of a state.

On the one hand, it is often thought by many people that the government of a state should contribute to learning of arts and cultural subjects such as music and dance for the children. For example, in some secondary schools, the government provides material required in the construction of different art projects or instruments like guitar and keyboard to learn music. This example clearly shows that by providing support to the young students, the government could easily promote cultural and traditional values all around the world. Hence, governments are responsible for the growth of arts and music.

On the other hand, according to some people, instead of governing bodies, children's families or private agencies should participate in the growth and learning of music, dance or other arts work. For instance, students of a single class may not be equally interested in learning music or dance, so funding by the government could be wasted in this manner. Therefore, it is important that parents of interested kids should groom their children by sending them to private institutions where they can enjoy their preferences. In this way, funds by the government can be utilized well on some other things.

To conclude, I believe that government should provide all the facilities of learning arts and music, as this is the cultural heritage which should be preserved internationally.

Sample 3:

Some people believe that the government should fund training courses for performing arts like music, dance, and arts lessons for children, while others argue that businesses or students' families should bear this cost. I agree with the latter view.

On the one hand, proponents of government funding argue that arts education is a crucial part of a well-rounded education system. They believe that access to music, dance, and arts lessons should not be determined by socioeconomic status. Government funding can ensure that all children, regardless of their background, have the opportunity to explore their creativity and develop their talents. For example, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) in the United States embodies this approach, offering grants to bolster arts education initiatives nationwide, particularly benefiting students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. By nurturing students' interests in various art forms like visual arts, theater, music, and dance, these programs not only cultivate a profound appreciation for the arts but also pave the way for potential careers in these fields, enhancing their lives and cultural experiences.

On the other hand, some, myself included, believe that businesses or students' families should fund these training courses. Firstly, private enterprises should support performing arts training courses as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives. Businesses benefit from a culturally enriched society and should therefore contribute to the development of future artists and performers. For instance, a 2018 study by the NEA in the US found a positive correlation between arts and culture and economic growth, with communities boasting vibrant arts sectors often experiencing increased tourism, job creation, and higher property values. Secondly, the primary responsibility for funding performing arts training should lie with families. Parents who prioritize their children's participation in such activities should bear the financial burden. This perspective aligns with the idea of personal responsibility and may encourage families to place a higher value on arts education.

In conclusion, while government funding can ensure equal access and foster societal benefits, I believe that businesses and families should primarily fund performing arts training, as this approach promotes personal responsibility and recognizes the significant benefits to both individual children and society as a whole.

Sample 4:

Art is paramount to the advancement of culture, making the teaching of arts for children an interesting topic of discussion. While some believe that the government should provide funding for this educational effort, others support the idea of private funding instead. In my opinion, training courses for performing arts should be paid for by businesses and children’s families.

The reasons to argue in favor of public funding vary. Firstly, the proponents of this claim believe that the responsibility of improving cultural talent for the young generation belongs to the entire society. The government, hence, has to represent the people in this endeavor and do whatever necessary to achieve this goal, including allocating the budget to performing arts education for children. If the authorities attempt this wholeheartedly, furthermore, they can produce the most far-reaching impact in improving the youth’s artistic, musical, and dancing skills. This is because the government has the most extensive tools at their disposal, such as bureaucrats and local authorities, to provide services to the population.

However, private funding sources seem more sensible in this regard. If the responsibility of paying for the youth’s artistic education falls upon businesses, the government would be able to maintain or prioritize spending on other necessities, such as critical infrastructure and healthcare. Because scouting and training new generations of artistic talent is a challenging process whose success is not always guaranteed, the expense might grow out of proportion and burden the government funding it. It can be up to wealthy businesspeople, for instance, to provide grants or scholarships for performing arts programs. At the same time, families should be responsible as well. As the closest people to their offspring, parents would likely be the first to discover, as well as benefit from their children’s artistic skills. It is naturally their role, hence, to spend on the honing of such abilities.

In conclusion, while the authorities can invest in performing arts education for the young generation, families and businesses are more well-suited for this role. If this responsibility can be assumed fully by the private sector, the government would be able to continue to function efficiently while the society enjoys cultural benefits.

Sample 1:

In most of the countries, it is mandatory to complete secondary education for employment. While some people are critical of this mandate, I absolutely believe that compulsory education is a deeply rooted process which makes an adult out of an adolescent.

Education teaches us the necessary social, cognitive and emotional skills which have become a prerequisite to success in today’s world. Subsequently, as high school education becomes better, the graduates have a better chance at landing good opportunities, both in terms of growth and employment. For example, the subjects taught in school, like English, Science, Mathematics and so on, help a child create a sound base, which will help him in the future, should he choose to explore the said fields as viable career options.

Continuing on the same note, a classroom setting doesn’t just nourish theoretical and practical knowledge of a child, but also his social skills, as a classroom is a place where children interact, often solving problems together. For example, group assignments, often found in educational settings, instil the important skill of teamwork. Hence, education should be mandatory for everyone.

To conclude, knowledge gained from books, teachers and interactions is impressive. Therefore, the authorities should make sure that people at least complete their secondary education, which is, they study till 18 years of age.

Sample 2:

Education plays a crucial role in shaping an individual's future, and there is a growing consensus that staying in school until the age of 18 is essential. I completely agree with this viewpoint because it ensures a solid educational foundation and equips young people with critical skills needed for modern society.

Firstly, remaining in school until 18 provides individuals with a robust educational foundation, leading to better job prospects, higher incomes, and overall socioeconomic advancement. Generally, individuals with higher levels of education have greater access to a wider range of job opportunities. Completing high school equips students with essential skills and knowledge that are prerequisites for entry-level positions in many industries. For instance, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reports a strong correlation between educational attainment and employment opportunities. Individuals with higher levels of education tend to have lower unemployment rates and access to a wider range of job options. This demonstrates that a solid educational background can significantly enhance an individual's career prospects and economic stability.

Secondly, staying in school until 18 allows young people to develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and technical skills necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The skills and knowledge required to navigate society, and the workforce are constantly evolving, driven by rapid technological advancements. Remaining in school until 18 enables students to acquire and refine these skills through comprehensive coursework and hands-on experiences. For example, modern education systems incorporate technology and critical thinking exercises into their curricula, preparing students to effectively utilize and adapt to new technologies. This continuous learning process is crucial for young people to remain competitive and adaptable in a fast-changing job market.

In conclusion, staying in school until 18 is essential for ensuring that individuals have a solid educational foundation and the critical skills needed for success in today's complex world.

Sample 3:

There is a disagreement regarding the issue of whether or not people should go to school until they are 18 years old. Some people believe that we have to stay in school before becoming an adult while others insist that it is not necessary to take lessons in school until the age of eighteen. In my opinion, I personally agree with the former because it is beneficial for people to go to school. I think studying in school provides us with opportunities related to jobs and relationships.

Firstly, I think that people ought to study in school until they become an adult since it offers students a chance to get their job. It is well known that most companies hire employees who at least graduated from high school these days. Corporations want to employ laborers who studied basic knowledge in school because working in a company requires skills to handle various tasks such as writing, communication, and calculation. These are fundamental abilities that can be learned only from school. Therefore, it is important for people to stay in school since they are able to obtain essential knowledge for holding jobs.

Furthermore, I believe that going to school plays a vital role in forming social networks. It is obvious that relationships are crucial for people to survive, so a famous philosopher said that human beings are social animals. Schools give us an opportunity to make numerous friendships that can help people communicate and cooperate with others. Although one person may have brilliant talents to achieve difficult things, it is impossible to solve every matter by oneself without anyone’s helps in daily life. Thus, people should stay in school to build a variety of relationships that have positive effects on their lives.

In conclusion, I agree that it is mandatory for people to go to school until 18 years old because it provides us with two advantages. First of all, schools offer people a chance to apply for companies, also it helps students make friends that can affect positively in their lives.

Sample 4:

In many countries, school attendance is mandatory for all children up to a specific age. In India this is 14 years of age. In the UK and many other countries, it is 16, although the UK government now has plans to raise the school leaving age to 18. I agree that children should be in school till the age of 18. In the following paragraphs, I intend to put forth my arguments to support my views.

The most important reason for raising the school leaving age to 18 is that the age of 14-18 is the most impressionable age of a child’s life. During this period of adolescence, the children undergo physical and hormonal changes because of which they are under a lot of pressure. Therefore, lengthening compulsory schooling helps protect childhood. While at school students will be protected from some of the pressures in life. They have the rest of their adulthood to work, make budgets balance and make choices. Providing them with space to grow for as long as possible can make them better prepared for adult life.

Secondly, more education provides the opportunity to acquire more skills and therefore more options. It has been shown many times that those with more education find it easier to find work and that they are more likely to find that work satisfying. What is more, raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society’s future. Doing so increases the economic potential of the future workforce, and so will bring increased tax revenues in the long term.

However, the opponents claim that extending the period of compulsory education requires a huge investment in teachers, books and new school buildings which would be very expensive. They also say that many families need their children to make an economic contribution to the family income and working early can help these families to survive. Finally, just being in school does not guarantee that a student is learning. Unwilling students become disruptive and damage the education of others in their class.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, as every garden has weeds, similarly compulsory schooling also has some drawbacks. However, these drawbacks are nothing as compared to the vast benefits this approach would bring and the cost needed to implement would be negligible if compared to the huge economic potential of the future workforce. Therefore, I believe that everyone should stay in school until the age of eighteen.

Sample 5:

Education is essential to be able to live meaningfully. That is a general notion. A person who is in school till eighteen would have finished his basic education. It should be compulsory for all youngsters as it is beneficial for them; however, if there is an interest in non-academic education such as in sports or fine arts, that should be encouraged. Staying in school till eighteen does not necessarily mean they will be successful in their lives. In many countries, it is the norm that young people go to school till eighteen, and dropouts would have problems finding a career. In ancient cultures like in India, getting educated did not always mean attending school; it meant learning essential skills for life and then choosing to specialize in any field.

While most students who study until eighteen are more or less sure of a fair chance at beginning their career, the dropouts would often find it difficult. Getting a school certificate can mean the difference between a manual hard-working type of life or an easier, more comfortable life. In developing countries, it is necessary that all children and young people stay in school till they finish basic school education and being ready for university. It can change a country’s fortune. In the case of the Philippines and India, there is a direct benefit of mass education; it lifts the population out of poverty. Not staying in school till eighteen or completing high school could mean disaster for any country. It is clear that to be educated is the most desirable easy path to a fairly comfortable beginning.

On the other hand, it is worth noticing that many successful entrepreneurs are school dropouts, and they employ thousands of school graduates. That is the irony; some of the biggest corporations in the world were started by so-called less educated folk.

To conclude, one must follow one heart when it comes to the direction of their lives, and that includes education; if the choice is to be the proverbial sheep, then staying in school till eighteen is a must but not a guarantee of success.

Sample 6:

It is considered by some people that everyone should go to school until they are 18 years old. I completely agree with this opinion as I think that studying at school is valuable.

To begin with, staying in school until reaching the age of 18 may be unnecessary. First of all, if students who are younger than 18 years old decide their future job and are ready to work, it is reasonable to start pursuing what they want. Wasting several years on studying what they do not want in high school can be extremely inefficient for this point of view. Secondly, education is not confined to schools. People may learn not only in school but also at home or through other means, such as online courses, libraries, museums, and community centers.

Nevertheless, students have to stay in school until they are 18 years old. First and foremost, schools provide a variety of educational opportunities and activities that may not be available at home. Even if they know what they want and what they plan to do for their future careers at an earlier age, they still need time to explore and experience other aspects of life in a school environment, where they can interact with peers and teachers. In addition, ensuring that public education keeps students in school until they are 18 will reduce the risk of them falling into educational gaps. Everyone needs to acquire sufficient knowledge to live independently and succeed in life.

In conclusion, it is both effective and efficient for children to study in educational institutions until they are 18 years old. Therefore, it is crucial for students to stay in school until they reach 18 to fully benefit from these opportunities and to build a strong foundation for their future.

Sample 7:

I firmly believe that extending compulsory education to the age of 18 would be highly beneficial for individuals and society as a whole. While some argue that this would stifle individual aspirations, I believe that the advantages of a more comprehensive and robust education outweigh any potential drawbacks.

Firstly, staying in school until 18 would allow young people to gain a deeper understanding of various academic disciplines, fostering intellectual curiosity and critical thinking skills. A more extended period of formal education would enable students to explore their interests and talents more thoroughly, equipping them with the knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in today’s complex and ever-evolving world. Furthermore, it would provide them with a strong foundation for further education or vocational training, opening up a wider range of career paths and opportunities.

Moreover, staying in school until 18 could provide valuable social and emotional benefits. It would foster a sense of community and belonging, allowing young people to develop strong social bonds and learn how to navigate interpersonal relationships effectively. It could also provide a structured environment for young people to develop essential life skills, such as time management, problem-solving, and decision-making. This could help them become more responsible, independent, and adaptable individuals, contributing positively to society.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that extending compulsory education to the age of 18 would be a valuable investment in the future of individuals and society. While some may argue that this could stifle individual aspirations, the benefits of a more comprehensive and robust education, including enhanced intellectual development, social and emotional growth, and increased career opportunities, outweigh any potential drawbacks. By equipping young people with the knowledge, skills, and resilience they need to succeed in a complex and rapidly changing world, we can create a more informed, adaptable, and engaged citizenry.

Sample 8:

It is often said that if one wants to succeed in life, that person needs a proper education. While there may be arguments for making school compulsory until the age of 18, I disagree that this should apply to everyone.

Perhaps the strongest reason for not leaving school early is that it prepares you for your working career. If students leave school early with only a basic education, they are unlikely to be able to find any skilled work. Indeed, the education people receive between the ages of 16 and 18 is crucial for anyone who does not want a lifetime of unskilled work in a factory.

Another compelling reason for remaining in school until 18 is that school provides moral and social education. This is particularly important for those between 16 and 18 who have many temptations and benefit from the organised framework that school provides. Young people who stay in school until the age of 18 tend to be more responsible and help build a stronger society.

There are, however, equally strong arguments against making school compulsory until the age of 18. One such argument is that not everyone is academic and that some people benefit more from vocational training. For instance, someone who wants to become a car mechanic may find better training and more satisfaction in an apprentice scheme. Another related argument is that, in today’s world, young people are maturing ever more quickly and are able to make their own life decisions by the age of 16.

In a word, I believe that all individuals should be encouraged to stay in school until 18 both for social and career reasons. However, it would be a mistake to make this compulsory, bearing in mind the fact that different people have different needs and abilities as well as the possibilities of other forms of vocational training.

Sample 9:

Some people think that all children should stay at school until the age of eighteen. Although staying at school until adulthood can produce a number of benefits, I personally disagree with this idea for a number of reasons, which will be outlined in this essay.

On the one hand, the idea that children should continue to study at school until the age of eighteen does have a number of benefits. Firstly, most young people under the age of eighteen have very little real-world experience and have very little idea of what career they will pursue, and therefore staying at school until the age of eighteen will allow them further opportunity to develop their education and time to decide upon a suitable career path. Furthermore, forcing children to stay at school until the age of eighteen will create a more educated future generation of people which may help to reduce some social and unemployment problems.

On the other hand, there are also a number of drawbacks that this idea may bring with it. For instance, many children these days do not fit-in with the current education system and forcing them to participate in school can cause many problems. For example, these kinds of students are usually very disruptive in a classroom, and this affects other students who are trying to learn. In addition to this, many children choose to follow careers that do not require them to continue studying in school past the age of sixteen. For example, for those who wish to pursue a career that requires more practical based learning, such as a qualified builder, electrician or machinery operator, it is quite unnecessary to remain at school until the age of eighteen.

In conclusion, although there would be a number of positive effects from children remaining at school until a later age, I personally feel that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits mentioned above.

Sample 10:

In contemporary society, the proposition that adolescents ought to remain in formal education until the age of 18 has sparked a vibrant debate. This discourse examines the balance between extending educational opportunities and recognizing diverse pathways to adulthood.

Advocates for mandatory education until 18 argue that it equips young individuals with essential knowledge and skills, fostering a well-informed and competent future workforce. Within the Vietnamese context, this approach could significantly contribute to elevating the overall educational standard, aligning with the nation's aspirations towards becoming a knowledge-based economy. For instance, if young people were required to pursue their studies until this age, Vietnam might witness an increase in skilled professionals across various sectors, from technology to healthcare, bolstering economic resilience and innovation. Yet, this perspective might not fully account for the nuanced needs of all students, particularly those whose strengths lie outside the academic realm or who are eager to enter vocational training or entrepreneurship early.

However, I believe that while education is fundamentally important, a blanket mandate for full-time education until 18 may not serve every individual's best interests. The diversity of talents and career aspirations among young people necessitates a more flexible approach to education. For example, in Vietnam, many successful entrepreneurs and artisans began their careers without completing traditional full-time education until 18, instead opting for specialized training or starting their enterprises at a younger age. This pathway should be recognized as equally valid, provided that young individuals are making informed decisions about their futures.

In conclusion, while advocating for extended education until 18 is well-intentioned, aiming to prepare young people for the complexities of the modern world, it is crucial to acknowledge and support alternative educational and vocational pathways. A more inclusive approach, accommodating the varied talents and aspirations of the youth, would arguably contribute more effectively to both individual fulfillment and societal progress.

Sample 11:

Whether every student should stay at school or not is a debatable topic. Some people argue that students should be allowed to leave school before completing their secondary education so that they can pursue their own interests. However, some people disagree with this fact. I agree that it is very important to complete education before adulthood. Education is a very integral part of one’s career. It should be completed before plunging into the professional world. Education can enrich students with the knowledge and skills that are required to survive in today's world. It is very important for everyone to learn the basics of human life and morals which can be attained through education. Youth is considered to be the developmental unit of every country. They should be provided with adequate knowledge and opportunities. Their knowledge plays an important role in the development of a country.

It is proven that students who have completed their higher education get better job opportunities than those who do not complete their education. For example, it is very important to learn a worldwide foreign language like English. It will help them to communicate and work with people around the world. Learning a global language helps to get jobs abroad and in other countries. This can be learned if the students complete their education in school properly.

Life on the school campus is very important. People need to socialize, and they learn this at school. Socializing helps a child to mature and learn a variety of skills. Students are able to spend time with their peers and teachers. This helps them to be familiar with communal life and also prepares them for their workplace interaction. Students gain a huge amount of knowledge from their classrooms, textbooks, teachers, and school environment. Not only book knowledge but also real-life knowledge is gained. These play a vital role in framing the students' future and also preparing them for their future prospects.

Hence, it is very important for a child to complete their education. I believe that higher secondary education exists for a reason and that cannot be broken. The authorities should also take part in this by stopping students from leaving school before they complete their school education. parents should be encouraged to keep their children at school until they are prepared.

Sample 12:

It is essential to be regular in school until the student attains 18. I am for this view. Every student must go to school until he is 18. Here are some positive and negative impacts of not attending school.

Schooling provides huge opportunities to acquire skills, knowledge, and moral values. Which are essential in future life. School life also provides the students an opportunity to mingle with other students, which makes them learn how to socialize with others. They get to know many moral values like how to behave in a public place, how to interact with each other, etc. All this learning will help them in their professional life in the future and will widen their job opportunities. Educating all the children will also reduce illegal activities and child employment. For example, if all the children in a village complete their schooling. Instead of helping their family in the field of farming. Then they will acquire the basic skills and knowledge that are essential to get a better-paid job than farming. Then their family can also get relieved from poverty.
On the other hand, if they do not have proper schooling, or drop out of school early, then they can get engaged in criminal activities. As they get enough spare time, and do not get proper guidance or cannot build the basic intelligence to decide. Whether it is good or bad for themselves, they fall into the wrong pockets. They will become lazy, and as it is well-known, a lazy mind is a devil’s paradise. They will lose their capability to work hard and will get engaged in criminal activities. For example, one of my distant relatives in my village did not send their son to school as they had some family issues. Therefore, their son used to ramble about here and there without any planning and did not have any moral, social, or cultural values. Thus, slowly he started losing his capability to work, and ability to make wise decisions. Eventually, he joined a racket.

Thus, these two instances highlight both the positive and negative impacts of completing schooling until the age of 18. Therefore, it is important for everyone to stay in school until they reach 18.

Sample 1:

The optimal size of a language class is a subject of ongoing debate, with proponents of both small and large classes advocating for their respective merits. While some believe that small classes provide a more personalized and effective learning environment, others contend that the number of students has little impact on the quality of education. This essay will explore both sides of the argument before presenting my own perspective.

Advocates for small classes argue that they allow for greater individualized attention and interaction. In smaller groups, teachers can tailor their instruction to the specific needs and learning styles of each student, providing personalized feedback and addressing individual learning gaps. Furthermore, students have more opportunities to engage in active conversation and practice their language skills in a less intimidating setting. This personalized approach can lead to faster progress and increased confidence in language acquisition.

However, proponents of larger classes argue that they offer a more diverse learning environment and can foster a sense of community amongst students. In larger groups, students are exposed to a wider range of perspectives and accents, which can enhance their understanding and appreciation of the nuances of language. Additionally, the dynamic interaction between multiple students can stimulate greater engagement and participation, creating a more vibrant and stimulating learning experience.

In my opinion, the ideal class size is contingent upon the specific learning objectives and the individual needs of the students. While small classes offer the benefit of personalized instruction and individual attention, larger classes can provide a more dynamic and stimulating learning environment. In general, I believe that a balanced approach is necessary, ensuring that teachers are equipped to cater to the diverse needs of their students, regardless of class size.

In conclusion, while both small and large classes have their respective advantages and disadvantages, the most effective learning environment is one that caters to the individual needs and learning objectives of the students. A balance between personalized attention and the benefits of a dynamic and diverse learning environment is crucial for maximizing language acquisition and fostering a positive learning experience.

Sample 2:

People have different opinions about the size of classes to study languages. One of them thinks that small groups are better while others believe that the number of students doesn't play a significant role in studying a language. All these are based on reasonable ideas, people in a small group are more efficient, but, as language learning requires immense efforts out of the class, the condition in a group shouldn't be overstated.

On the one hand, the efficiency of education in classes with a small number of participants is higher. There are two reasons for that: firstly, a teacher can provide more attention for each student to explain sophisticated matters or help with practical tasks. Secondly, each individual in the group shows more concentration when their number is small because there is less noise and other distracting factors, that significantly improves the quality of studying. Besides, small groups have a cosier atmosphere and, consequently, better engagement of the students in the education process.

On the other hand, large classes embrace more students, so teachers can use their time more efficiently, spreading the information for large audiences at the same time. Moreover, the importance of studying in class is overvalued, because studying of a language implies putting tremendous efforts out of the school, for instance, students have to learn new words by heart, practice for reading, listening, and resolving grammar tasks.

In my opinion, both approaches have positive and negative outcomes, but it doesn't mean that we should dismiss one of them. It is reasonable to apply all of them but for different stages of education. For example, beginners who need much more attention can study in small groups, but experienced students can train in large groups.

To conclude, people in a small group are more concentrated, so their efficiency of education is higher. However, in a large class, a teacher can influence more students at the same time. But the best results are revealed when these approaches depend on the stage of learning.

Sample 3:

Language teaching has long been a subject of debate, particularly with respect to the class size. While some pundits claim that the number of students present has negligible impact on the learning process, I am convinced otherwise, as more compact classrooms would lead to improved outcomes for learners.

On the one hand, several reasons exist to believe that the size of a language class is not detrimental to learning. Firstly, in a large classroom, multiple attendants can learn a new language at the same time, creating positive collective learning experiences. This happens as a result of students being able to form groups and exchange ideas with each other. Using technological tools, moreover, language teachers can dispense knowledge regardless of class size. Various digital platforms, such as Zoom, facilitate real-time communication and provide instant feedback, thereby eliminating the physical barriers between teachers and students. Certain studies have proved that technology-equipped classes produce improved language learning outcomes no matter how many students are present.

However, there are significant benefits that are exclusive to smaller classrooms regarding language learning. In any discipline, including linguistics, by having a limited number of students, teachers are able to provide more attention to individual attendants, which allows learners to obtain information more efficiently. A classroom of 10 students, for instance, is likely to experience a better knowledge retention rate in a 2-hour session compared to a classroom of 50. Furthermore, as class size decreases, attendants receive a more tailored and engaging approach to language education. As learning capability varies from student to student, if the classroom is sufficiently large, teachers will likely have to cater to the needs of the weaker-performing group by slowing the pace, which leaves them unable to maintain the interest of those who can grasp concepts rapidly.

In conclusion, despite the availability of advanced technology for language education, class size remains a consequential factor in ensuring effective outcomes. Small classrooms matter even though they are not the sole reason for successful language learning, because they can keep students engaged and facilitate efficient knowledge reception.

Sample 4:

It is important to teach languages in any education system. Although some people argue that language classes ought to include a few numbers of students, others believe that the number of students is not important. I, personally, support the former view. This essay will discuss both perspectives and I will explain why I believe that small classes are better.

On the one hand, some people, as well as I, recommend limiting the number of students in language classes. This is because the pupils' concentration would be better, which makes the class more efficient. Therefore, they would be able to obtain more information and have better communication with their classmates and teachers. For example, this is translated by Laokaoya website, in a study conducted in the USA, when the class contained less than 20 students, their control of language was far better than those in classes with more students. If the students are not able to concentrate, they may give up and hate the language. Thus, I believe that small classes will help the students pay more attention and will be able to excel in learning the language.

On the other hand, another group advocates that the number of students does not impact efficiency because language teaching depends mainly on rote learning and after-class practice. Students should study at home to memorize vocabulary by heart as well as study grammar by solving exercises. Moreover, they are required to communicate with their classmates or people who have good conduct in the language for better conversation. Of course, even in small classes, if the students did not practise the language outside the school setting, their progress would be slower than their peers who did. In this respect, school is only to teach students the language content but not the perfect place to practise the language.

In conclusion, although some people believe that it is not necessary to teach language in small classes because the practice outside school premises is more crucial to develop their language, I still think that small classes are important to teach language skills as it provides better concentration, and teachers can help students overcome their weaknesses.

Sample 1:

There are a number of parents who are totally responsive to their children’s demands and let their offspring act as they wish. This parenting style should be considered negative as it fosters a self-centered attitude and brings about repercussions including the deficiency of independence and teamwork skills as these children become adults.

To begin with, permissive parents are detrimental to a child’s development as they nourish selfishness in their offspring. Specifically, children raised in indulgent environments generally have their own demands satisfied unconditionally, which leads them to prioritise their own needs over others. This gradually fosters them to be self-centered individuals. In reality, parents should be responsive to their children to an extent while respecting familial limitations such as financial burdens. These boundaries might teach them to think of others’ conditions and needs in addition to theirs, training them to be more considerate.

Furthermore, there are several negative outcomes of indulgence on children. Chief of these lies in the over-reliance on parents. This stems from the fact that excessive parental assistance can cause children to be short of opportunities to address challenges by themselves, which hinders the acquisition of essential skills for an independent lifestyle including dealing with rejections and solving problems. Another consequence is that children brought up by indulgent parents are more likely to struggle with teamwork. It is because their parents usually fail to make them accustomed to rules and boundaries, leading to a lack of respect for regulations in team settings. This shortage, in turn, prevents them from being constructive team members in academic and professional environments.

In conclusion, parental indulgence is rather harmful to children’s development considering its influence on their egotism. In addition, this parenting methodology might cause children to be dependent and unconstructive members of a society that rewards cooperation. Therefore, governments ought to provide more courses to provide parents with essential parenting skills and knowledge.

Sample 2:

Indulging children by giving them everything they ask for and letting them dictate their activities may seem like a way to make them happy in the short term, but it is not necessarily beneficial for their overall development. In my opinion, this parenting approach can have detrimental consequences as children grow up.

Firstly, when children are granted every request and whim, they may develop a sense of entitlement. For example, if a child always gets every toy they want immediately, they might later expect the same instant gratification in other areas like relationships or work. This may result in impatience and frustration when they face situations requiring patience or gradual progress. Furthermore, an overly permissive parenting style may fail to instill important values such as responsibility, discipline, and the ability to make wise choices. For instance, if parents frequently allow their child to skip school or neglect homework without consequences, the child may not learn the value of education, responsibility, or commitment. This could hinder their academic and professional success later in life.

As these children transition into adulthood, they may encounter challenges in adapting to a society that doesn't always cater to their desires. Their early experiences of having everything they want without effort might lead to difficulties in educational or workplace settings where self-discipline, personal responsibility, and the ability to delay gratification are essential. In academic environments, they may find it challenging to cope with the demands of higher education, where independent study, time management, and perseverance are crucial. Similarly, in the professional world, they might face difficulties when tasks require patience, dedication, and the ability to work towards long-term goals.

In conclusion, when children are consistently granted their every wish without experiencing the value of patience, responsibility, and hard work, they may face difficulties in adapting to the demands of adult life.

Sample 3:

It is true that some parents are quick to please their children and allow them leeway in their behavior. I personally consider this parental approach to be unwise, as it can have some negative implications for a child’s future.

The parenting style in question should generally be avoided for two reasons. The most evident problem with having no restrictions as a child is the possibility of a child’s being spoiled. Children whose wishes are granted unconditionally often become pampered and develop an inflated sense of superiority. This, in turn, makes them ungrateful and fussy children. Additionally, allowing children excessive autonomy in their conduct creates chances for developing bad habits. When unsupervised and unguided, children may be exposed to bad influences on the Internet such as explicit and violent content. They are also at risk of being involved with school bullies and gangs. In no way can a parenting style be justified if it does not involve any amount of supervision.

Having explored some problems with this so-called “free” parenting style, it is important to discuss how it can impact a child’s future. First of all, children who receive excessive attention and enjoy complete freedom are likely to have difficulties as adults. This is because when children are constantly appeased by their parents and never questioned, they develop a frivolous attitude. Care-free children, in turn, dismiss their future studies and job, without which they will experience financial hardships when they are legally independent. More concerning is the possibility of a child growing to become an anti-social individual. Because some parents do not hold their children accountable and make them abide by rules and societal norms, children become ill-behaved. In some extreme cases, poor supervision reinforces criminal behavior in children, which makes them would-be offenders.

In conclusion, parental approach involving excessive pleasing and no supervision is undesirable seeing as it sets children up for failure as an adult and makes them prone to immoral behavior.

Sample 4:

Parenting styles play a crucial role in shaping children's development and behavior, with permissive parenting being one approach that has attracted both attention and criticism. In my opinion, this parenting style would have negative implications for children, impacting not only their immediate behavior but also their long-term development and ability to thrive as adults.

One of the most notable consequences of indulgent parenting is the cultivation of a sense of entitlement in offspring. When a child, for instance, consistently receives expensive toys or gadgets without any requirement to earn them through good behavior or academic achievements, they may develop the expectation that they are entitled to material possessions without effort. This entitlement mindset can extend to other areas of life, such as expecting special treatment from teachers, demanding privileges from peers, or feeling entitled to preferential treatment in social settings, all of which can hinder the development of healthy relationships based on mutual respect and consideration.

Furthermore, indulgent parenting often leads to a lack of self-discipline and self-regulation in offspring. If parents fail to enforce appropriate rules or punishments for misbehavior, children may struggle to understand the importance of self-control and delayed gratification. This lack of discipline can manifest itself in various ways, such as making impulsive decisions without considering the consequences, having difficulty managing emotions during challenging situations, or exhibiting poor time management skills due to a lack of accountability. All of these setbacks, in turn, can significantly impact academic performance, career advancement, and the ability to maintain healthy personal relationships for children.

In conclusion, by fostering a sense of entitlement and undermining the development of crucial life skills such as self-discipline and responsibility, I contend that this permissive parenting style would detrimentally hinder children’s ability to thrive independently and cope with the challenges of adulthood successfully.

Sample 5:

In today's society, some parents are becoming increasingly permissive. They do not impose sufficient discipline on their children, and in some cases buy them too many things. This essay will explore why this is not a good way to raise children and why it will have negative impacts upon them in future.

While it is understandable that parents want to give their children expensive toys and let them run freely in the streets, this is actually not really an appropriate method of parenting. Having too many toys encourages children to be materialistic and does not offer them the same chance to develop social skills like sharing. Furthermore, when children have asked for the toys, it gives them a sense of entitlement and even power over their parents. As for giving children too much freedom, there are obviously a great many dangers in this world from which they need to be kept safe. Children also need rules and boundaries to encourage them to develop into mature and responsible adults.

If parents insist on this permissive style of parenting, their children will grow up with very different values from those of stricter parents. Children who were never forced to study will end up with poorer grades in school, and those who were given everything they wanted as children will expect everything to come easily as adults. In short, they will lead difficult and disappointing lives, in contrast with what their parents hoped.

In conclusion, although it is tempting to give children whatever they want, parents ought to set rules and boundaries, and to be careful with how they reward children. If parents fail to impose a basic level of discipline, children may grow up with a poor attitude that will cause them and others to suffer.

Sample 6:

In today’s world, it is no exaggeration to claim that some parents are becoming increasingly permissive. They do not impose adequate discipline on their children, and in some cases entitle them to have whatever they want. This essay will shed light on why this is not an appropriate way to bring up children and the long-term consequences the children are likely to face in the future.

While it seems feasible that parents want to give their children high-quality toys and let them run freely in the streets, this method of parenting might result in several adverse impacts on both children and parents themselves. Having too many toys encourages children to lead a materialistic life and prevents them from promoting social skills like sharing and saving. Another justification is that pestering parents to buy their favorite things undoubtedly gives children a sense of entitlement and, to some extent, power over their parents. With regards to entitling children with too much freedom, there are a great deal of potential dangers in this world from which they need to be kept safe. Without sufficient rules, discipline and boundaries, children run the risk of growing into immature and irresponsible adults, which is an alarming concern for future generations.

There are numerous risks associated with the parents’ overindulgence on children. If parents insist on this permissive, liberal style of parenting, their children will grow up with very different values and outlooks for life from those of less easy-going parents. Children who were never forced to pay attention to their study will fall behind their peers, hence end up with poorer grades in school. In addition, those who take things for granted will expect everything to come easily as adults. Consequently, they will lead difficult and disappointing lives, in contrast with what their parents have hoped.

To conclude, although it is tempting and partly plausible to give children whatever they want, parents are recommended to impose rules and boundaries on children, and to be aware of how they reward them. Lack of basic level of discipline may act as a deterrent to children growing into upright citizens and developing vital soft skills.

Sample 7:

Today, there is a growing trend among parents towards trying to accommodate their children's every demand and giving them more personal freedom. In this essay, I am going to demonstrate how this child-rearing practice is detrimental to children before arguing that its repercussions may reverberate in their adulthood.

Parents may wean their kids on an over-reliant lifestyle by fulfilling all of their wishes. Kids who are granted every request typically develop a habit of pestering and relying on their parents for everything. This dependence may deprive them of the motivation to strive in life, which may take a heavy toll on their school performance, for example. As these children become grown-ups, the inability to lead an independent lifestyle will cause them to struggle in many facets of life. For instance, people who are given generous allowances when they are small are unlikely to be able to budget and manage their personal finances. This is an example of the adverse impacts that parents' over-indulgence may have on small kids.

In addition to spoiling children, entitling them to too much personal freedom may also result in dire consequences. People's personalities are shaped at an early age, and without parents' close supervision, children may be vulnerable to negative influences and adopt harmful habits. For example, many children in Vietnam use profanities from as early as primary school because their parents allow them to play video games at Internet shops where cussing is the norm. This type of behavior, which often incites disobedience and recklessness, may be the precursor to an adulthood of crime. In fact, it has been shown that many criminals began rebelling and committing illegal acts from a young age as a result of their parents' negligence. This is a testament to how an unsupervised childhood may cause small kids to suffer serious consequences as they become adults.

In conclusion, granting children all of their wishes may do serious harm to their personal development, and thus this practice should be rejected to ensure a healthy lifestyle for their kids.

Sample 1:

Experts believe that interview is the primary aspect by which a worker should get a chance to work in a company. However, few are against this perspective and think that there are also other ways of selecting an employee. I agree with the former view to some extent. 

To begin with, the phrase "first impression is the last impression" comes to my mind now, because this is what interviews are all about. Also, there are multifarious reasons why a recruiter suggests an interview to be the most preferable among all other alternatives. Firstly, qualities like confidence, potential level, communication skills, temperament, and group leading are tested, which are mandatory for working in a multi-pound company. Secondly, interviewers can ask straightforward questions about some particular professions and their expectations. Thirdly, there is less scope for hiding personality traits as one has to answer impromptu questions. 

Contrarily, there are various methods that can be considered to appoint an individual for a different position in the company. Firstly, a written test is applied by many companies in which multiple-choice questions would be given for testing their knowledge, understanding ability, reasoning and logical skills. Secondly, in assessment headquarters, teamwork, as well as expertise-based skills, would be examined. Hence, there are some other ways that are better than the one-to-one interview. 

In conclusion, it might be incessant that hiring a suitable candidate for the position is a grueling responsibility and has to be a blend of Interviews, discussions, references check, and some written tests. 

Sample 2:

In this modern world, almost all multinational companies prefer one-to-one Interviews for the recruitment of an employee. Many people opine that this is a convenient method whilst others disagree with it. From my perception, taking interviews is genuinely pertinent because in terms a better opportunity to check an individual's technical acquaintance and confidence along with the way of speaking. 

To start with, a company receives many applications for the advertised job requirement position. Therefore, in order to thin out the herd, organizations organize these face-to-face discussions so as to reckon the interviewees. Furthermore, this way the recruiter will also be able to access the technical capability of the claimant and his expectations. Additionally, the disposition of the applicant can be evaluated along with his communication level. This all can be tested by face-to-face conversation. However, the candidate too can get the experience of this examination and can boost his confidence if trying to give another. 

Undeniably, interviews are the best way of choosing an employee. But, if the interview is for an important place, then it has to be set up merely and should be well executed. Additionally, it requires a meticulous perception of the firm's expectations. I think it's not a piece of cake. If it is for small purposes then it will be fruitful, or else alternative methods will be taken into account.

In a nutshell, I strongly recommend that interviews are imperative from a firm’s viewpoint for obtaining something fruitful for their reputed foundation as they are going to pay a handsome salary. 

Sample 3:

Many companies prefer Interviews as their satisfaction method for the basic selection of employees. But many people believe that this is not the correct option for hiring as there are other ways too. Well, I believe that though the interview process is the best solution it has some disadvantages too. I will justify my point of view in this essay. 

To begin with, advocates for supporting this interview method believe that in this contemporary era, where there is competition among people for equality and diversity, a universal strategy for drafting can be the key to the booking business. Secondly, the HR of that particular company should not prepare different question templates for every candidate. However, it makes the procedure uncomplicated and faster. Furthermore, a conference is a better way for future employees by which they make themselves comfortable and answerable to some common questions before person-to-person communication and it will help them to be relaxed also during the actual test. 

On the other hand, there are a few drawbacks to this method. Firstly, the personal qualities of an applicant cannot be taken into consideration. Secondly, the worst part is that it is monotonous. Many people answer the same day after day either because it is mentioned in their theoretical books, or they think if they will not play safely then they have to try for others. 

To sum up, maybe an interview is the best solution but if the company wants something really fruitful then recruiting should be done in a personalized way. Each one of us has something unique, and if a company expects something creative then this has to be taken into consideration. 

Sample 4:

Many people are of the opinion that interviews are the best for selection. While others are of the opinion that interviews are not the best method for assessment of skills. Most companies schedule interviews to assess the employee that they will be hiring. Recruiting new employees is of course a long and tedious process. I believe that it is the right way to assess the candidates and to understand them better. Some people are, however, of the opposing view. Different companies have different policies. Some believe that interviews might not be a reliable method to access the candidates. Some companies also hold a written test, followed by group discussions and then a technical interview. Group discussions also serve the best purpose. Interviews enable one to get the perspective of the candidate on different things. Also, confidence and other skills are seen. Nowadays, emotional intelligence is given much importance. The emotional intelligence can be seen through interviews. Also, it offers one the chance to have a face-to-face conversation. Usually, companies assess the candidates on their subject knowledge, communication and interpersonal skills by conducting several rounds. Companies that hire new employees undoubtedly want the best of the candidates, which is why a thorough critiquing of the person is required. I honestly believe that interviews are a reliable method as compared to written tests or group discussions. While interviewing the interviewer can test his knowledge and communication skills simultaneously. A few companies interview two to three candidates at the same time instead of a one-on-one interview. Interviews can tell a lot about the candidate, and they can make an informed decision on the spot. It also removes the unnecessary hassles of conducting written tests which adds up to the hiring process. The interviewer can also assess the candidate’s conduct via interviews; thus, they are the most efficient and reliable methods to hire candidates.

Sample 5:

Hiring and assessing new hires is undoubtedly a tedious task. I believe companies that have a long hiring process are nothing but a waste of time. A candidate’s knowledge, conduct, communication and other skills can easily be assessed via an interview, instead of assessing them via 2-3 rounds. Long hiring process adds to the complexity of the hiring process and also puts the candidates under a lot of pressure. Considering that the success of a company is majorly dependent on the skills and efforts of the employees. Being interviewed is an essential factor in getting hired for a job in a renowned organization.

During a comprehensive interview, an employer gains a firsthand impression of their future employee. Interviews help the interviewer to assess the candidates on a personal level. Their communication skills and conduct are also critiqued via the same. Moreover, I believe a candidate’s subject knowledge can be analyzed in a better way via interviews. It also helps interviewees to understand how a candidate might behave under pressure. Interviews also help verify the information that candidates have mentioned in their applications. Thus, it helps them make an informed and quick decision. In this way, employers can avoid hiring the wrong candidate. Every job requires a candidate to possess certain skills. For example, government jobs require candidates to have more theoretical knowledge of the subject which is assessed by written tests. The interview that follows is either a formality on the company’s behalf or to analyze a candidate’s communication skills. It doesn’t have relevance if it is a field job that requires the candidates to have advanced knowledge on the subject. Unless it is a job that requires both experience and skills, for instance, an interview will suffice. Thus, I prefer interviews as the most cost-effective, and efficient method of hiring.

Sample 6:

According to some people, interviews are best for selection. While many do not consider interviews as an effective medium for selection. People are divided on whether companies must interview candidates while hiring new employees. Some people agree to this fact while others disagree. I myself believe that interviews are the most reliable form to understand a candidate. Every company has certain requirements and skills that they are looking for in candidates. For example, a marketing company would require candidates to have exemplary interpersonal, communication and leadership skills. A field job would require candidates to have more theoretical knowledge or experience in the field. I believe while hiring in a marketing company interviews as the entire job role is based on the candidates communicating with the clients. A field engineer or a technician requires knowledge of the equipment thus, they can be assessed via a written test. In such cases interviews alone might not help in critiquing the candidates. Interviews offer face-to-face conversations. It also gives the exact information about the candidate. Also, one can check their abilities and skills. Confidence is an important factor which is determined by interviews. Also, according to psychologists, interviews increase one’s communication skills. The candidate tries their best to impress the employers. Emotional intelligence as well as IQ can be determined by interviews. Thus, there are major roles that require a candidate to pass the written as well as interview rounds. While there are others that need to be scrutinized to such an extent. The hiring process should be decided based on the respective job description. Companies shouldn’t standardize a fixed hiring process, instead cut-short the hiring process to hire the best candidate. For me, interviews are the best form of hiring candidates. It gives the interviewer a thorough understanding of the candidates.

Sample 7:

Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. The success of any business or organization depends on the quality of its staff. Some employers conduct interviews to select new workers. I agree with the given statement which says that there are various other approaches. This essay intends to analyze methods of hiring new employees.

Undoubtedly, an interview is an important method of recruitment. If the selection has to be done merely in an interview, then the interview has to be well executed. It requires a detailed understanding of the organizational needs as well as a careful grasp of the prospective employees’ responses. It is not an easy task. If the recruitment is a small scale and only a few employees are needed, it can prove fruitful otherwise alternative methods to hire have to be taken into account.

There are many other methods which can be employed to hire new personnel. These hiring methods are a combination of several step-by-step tests. Initially, job vacancies are advertised, after which the recruiters select resumes, which meet the basic requirements for that particular job position. Then the written test is conducted to judge the skills and knowledge of the person. This is followed by group discussions and some other skill tests. Then the shortlisted candidates are interviewed. After this, background checks and reference checks are done of those shortlisted after the interview. It is important to check the credit record and criminal record. The reference checks are done to ascertain the authenticity of what is written in the resume. Finally, the selected candidates are sent for a health check to rule out any communicable diseases.

Analyzing the above-mentioned methods, it can be seen that no single method is perfect. Each job has its own requirements. Some jobs require qualifications, and some require experience. Big companies have a department devoted to human resources, which takes care of the hiring issues, but for small businesses finding the right employees at the right times can be an especially time-consuming and frustrating struggle. External recruitment agencies can be assigned the task of searching for suitable candidates for jobs, but it may be very expensive. However, I believe that spending on the recruitment of new employees can prove to be a good investment, as good employees can breathe new life into your business.

To sum up, it can be reiterated that finding suitable employees is an arduous task and has to be a combination of written tests, group discussions, interviews, and reference checks.

Sample 8:

How credible interviewing is as a method of recruitment is a question posed by many people. Some have gone as far as claiming it to be ineffective and substitutable by other methods. Although this claim is defendable in certain ways, there are also several arguments against it.

To start with, I acknowledge that interviewing has its own limitations. Conventional interviewing may prove less flexible under certain circumstances. Requiring recruiters and candidates to arrange a physical appointment, this method may not work in unexpected conditions such as epidemics, unfavourable weather or geographic distances, hence heavy reliance upon it may cause the business a loss of opportunities to reach qualified candidates. Besides, recruiters may also fail to evaluate candidates’ competence thoroughly. This is especially the case for phone and online interviews, where recruiters cannot fully control whether candidates use aiding tools.

However, interviewing is still employed by a great many businesses thanks to its merits. Interviews help assess candidates’ suitability more directly and on a larger number of aspects like their understanding of the company and the position applied for, working manners and attitudes, presentation skills, etc., compared with product-based methods. In fact, it is not by chance that such global companies as Google and Apple, or our national airline, Vietnam Airlines, have never removed interviewing from their recruitment procedures. Rather than eliminating interviewing as an unreliable way, recruiters should use it in combination with other methods. For instance, while interviewing could serve as a preliminary round to narrow down the list of prospects, authentic-task-based tests can help assess their professional skills.

In conclusion, although the credibility of interviewing is sometimes undermined by its rigidity and inadequacy, this method has continued to be widely used due to its interactiveness and directness.

Sample 9:

Recruiting new employees for the firm is a long and tedious process. However, a company’s success depends on the quality of its employees, which is why firms place a greater emphasis on interview rounds throughout the hiring process. Few people believe that an interview is not the only way to determine whether or not someone is qualified for a job. In my opinion, interviewing is the most reliable technique for recruiting an employee in a firm. In the following paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view in detail.

Primarily, companies prefer interviews because it allows them to get to know employees face-to-face and allow the interviewee to ask straightforward questions about their particular professions. Interviews also aid in understanding the interviewee’s personality and degree of confidence. It also aids companies in determining whether the information they have included in their resume is true or forged.

Besides that, there are several additional reasons why interviews are a good technique for selecting applicants. This technique enables companies to quickly assess the work’s capability and make an informed selection decision. Also, owing to unexpected circumstances, some applicants may not be able to perform their best in the exam while having a strong understanding of their area. The interview, on the other hand, allows them to convey their knowledge, confidence, and abilities.

Some people believe that interviews are unreliable techniques for evaluating an individual’s talents and that other approaches, such as recruiting tests, should be used. But interviews allow employers to assess the interviewee’s professional abilities and their whole personality and conduct.

To summarise, there are a variety of ways to evaluate a candidate’s profile. Yet interviews have proven to be the most successful method of assessing a candidate’s skills and talents.

Sample 1:

People have different views on the subjects that the government should invest in and prioritise, to achieve what is termed economic development. Some believe that a larger portion of government funds should be dedicated to teaching science-related. In my opinion, although science plays a large role, other subjects hold merit in their own right in contributing to, and in driving, economic progress and therefore, deserve equal government investment and funding.

On the one hand, public funding in science education subjects is important in driving the development of a country in many areas, such as engineering and medicine. For example, developed countries such as Japan has emphasised the science education of their citizens. This strong focus has led to science learning, knowledge, and scientific research achievement fosters innovation and increases productivity, which directly contributes to the national economic growth of the nation. Therefore, investment in the teaching of science education is crucial for a country’s economic progress.

On the other hand, the management of the nation also determines its state of development and economic progress. As such, it can be argued that curriculum subjects such as social sciences and law require as much attention and investment. For example, developing economies such as Indonesia and Cambodia have long experienced a history of political and social unrests and conflicts. We can largely attribute this to instability and poor management of legal, social and governmental systems. This is in contrast to their Asian counterparts such as Singapore and Korea, where well-established and stable civil law and political institutions can be observed.

In conclusion, subjects related to the management of a nation’s economy such as social sciences have as much impact and significance on the development and progress of one’s nation and deserve as much government investment as science subjects.

Sample 2:

How to allocate government expenditure has long been a highly charged issue. While 1 accept that there should be an increase in state funds for imparting science-related knowledge, 1 would argue that other subjects are of similar significance in the progression of a nation.

On the one hand, placing a premium on science subjects like mathematics and physics is conducive to the growth of a nation. It stands to reason that the more researchers or engineers a country has, the greater is their contribution to the prosperity of a society. To illustrate, with billions of dollars spent for scientific researches and relevant leaching activities, America has accomplished a number of breakthroughs in road networks, biotechnology and space exploration. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that stressing the role of science subjects in the education system would have a far-reaching long-term impact on a nation.

On the other hand, I believe that liberal arts education including literature and law has an equally important role to play in the sustainable growth of a nation. It is widely acknowledged that a society characterized by citizens well-cultivated and knowledgeable in literature or arts tend to enjoy a higher moral standard and social stability. Specifically, law-abiding and productive citizens tend to adopt decent code of conduct and commit fewer crimes, leading to better social security and improved living standards. As an expected outcome, government funding on social sciences would help individuals alter their intrinsic values and do their utmost to become productive members of society.

Sample 3:

In recent years, there has been talk of prioritising science over other subjects for the sake of national progress. Although science is important, I argue that humanities subjects should also be included in the curriculum.

Science could be said to have been a revolutionising force in improving the material conditions of humanity and thus can be argued to rightfully be prioritised within any learning program. Scientific breakthroughs allow production processes to become more efficient, improving both the quality and quantities of goods. These goods can either be exported to the international market, improving a country’s prosperity, or used by the domestic population to improve their lives. It was through improving its scientific research that the United States, for example, is at the forefront of technology and leads in economic and military prowess.

However, one might also argue that arts and humanities should be taught as well, for they create leaders that can effectively guide science to its most socially beneficial conclusions. Science could be said to be a tool, and like other tools, require a direction that it can be used towards. More specifically, there are many ethical problems with using scientific technology such as gene editing that requires those who can consider the potential social consequences. Without arts and humanities, science might not serve the benefit of mankind and might lead us towards a very dark path.

Therefore, I believe that although science is important, it cannot be left on its own. As such, along with a new generation of scientists, governments should also invest in bringing up a generation of philosophers and politicians.

Sample 4:

The advancement of science, and its application in a wide range of areas, has improved the lives of almost everyone around the world. As a result, it is essential that governments should devote additional funds to teaching science, although other subjects still have their importance.

The primary reason for this view is that scientific education teaches critical thinking. Science is based on asking questions about the world that can be tested in order to find answers that anyone can find for themselves. Without a sound scientific education, the average person is more likely to believe superstition, old wives’ tales, and the beliefs of their ignorant ancestors, which makes it easier for them to be deceived and taken advantage of by governments and other people in their daily lives. The fact is that developed societies have high levels of scientific knowledge, while less developed ones do not.

Of course, it is also necessary for students to study other subjects so that they can become well-rounded individuals. Science helps us to explain the world, but we also have to live in it. Being able to appreciate art, music, and literature helps us to understand each other and lead more satisfying lives. An advanced society needs both science to progress and art to make life worth living.

In summary, science helps a nation to advance by allowing its citizens to think independently and make decisions that are supported by evidence. Without a basic understanding of science, the world would be – and was – a much worse place.

Sample 5:

It is said that government funding for education should give preference to science-based subjects over others, in an attempt to help boost a countries future development and progress. Although an increase in scientific developments can have many benefits to national progress, this essay disagrees that science is the primary contributor.

There is no question that the advent of modern science has brought with it a number of improvements to the way that countries and societies function. For example, increases in electrical and computer-based technologies have led to much more streamlined and efficient workplaces. Computers and computerized machinery can now do the work of what would have previously been carried out by humans, allowing greater efficiency and higher productivity output. Another benefit that modern science has granted is the development of renewable energy. Sources of renewable energy, such as solar and wind generated power, are beginning to help ease the planet’s reliance on fossil fuels.

That being said, an increase in scientific education and development must not be the main measure of a country’s progress. It can be seen that the study of many other disciplines of education can also contribute to a country’s progress. Take for example, the Arts and Humanities. Subjects such as History and Philosophy have allowed us to gain a better understanding of humanity and can help us to gain more insight into how we can move forward as a race. Other subjects such as the Arts, allow societies and individuals to express themselves creatively through mediums such as music, film and other art forms. It can be argued that this can also help to improve the quality of people’s lives and therefore help a country’s overall development.

In conclusion, although developments in science have led to many beneficial advantages for most countries, science alone is not the key contributor to a country’s progress. In my opinion, most countries would benefit more greatly from a more well-rounded education, with emphasis on all disciplines, not only that of science.

Sample 6:

There are different views about whether governments should only focus on the teaching of science subjects to help their countries develop. While I accept that concentrating on these subjects brings about benefits, I would argue that it is better not to neglect other subjects.

For a variety of reasons, I agree that the focus on teaching science-related subjects helps a country progress. Firstly, many of the scientific breakthroughs rely heavily on knowledge of mathematics, physics and chemistry. For example, in the field of medicine, scientists need great knowledge of chemistry to do research and invent new drugs. The teaching quality of these subjects should therefore be continuously improved. Secondly, when students study science subjects, they need to find solutions to a wide range of different problems, which can encourage their creativity and imagination. Such capabilities play an important role in coming up with technological innovations, and these advances help a country gain a competitive edge over other nations.

Despite the above arguments, it seems to me that students should also pay attention to other subjects. In the era of globalization, international trade significantly contributes to the development of a country. It is nearly impossible to engage in trading activities with other countries if language barriers exist. This means that the government needs to invest in the teaching of foreign languages. In Vietnam, for instance, most people can speak English fluently because the school curriculum focuses largely on this subject. Since Vietnamese people are able to work with foreigners, the country attracts many investments from other parts of the world.

In conclusion, while I agree that government spending on teaching science subjects helps a country progress, I believe that teaching subjects such as foreign languages is also necessary.

Sample 7:

Education financing, which is critical to a country's development, is a major source of worry in modern society. People have differing opinions on whether or not the government should fund science disciplines more than others for the country's sake. To some extent, I agree that science education is desirable; but I also feel that non-scientific disciplines must be included.

The upside of funding science is it has a lot to offer. To begin with, emphasis on science results in the creation of a highly skilled intellectual workforce, which will bring about great changes in a country’s growth and development. Second, science education is required for a variety of occupations, including physicist, medical scientist, and others. People cannot acquire these kinds of positions without a science-based understanding, which helps produce greater economic value. Finally, consider what the current world would be like if science didn't exist. The response is emphatically 'no.' since it is possible that its products, like computers or computerised machinery, may not be created in the future.

Non-scientific topics, on the other hand, are, in my opinion, just as essential as science education. The first argument is that topics like arts and history are critical in assisting pupils in gaining a broad understanding of the world and developing into well-rounded individuals. For example, arts encourage students to be more creative and confident in their expression, which cannot be achieved just via math and science. In addition to the reasons stated above, I feel that ignoring these issues may result in an imbalance in the distribution of the nation's labour. A country cannot progress only on the basis of science while the other aspects are neglected. As a result, in order to avoid a scarcity of art-related occupations, such as journalist or artist, people should stress them as well.

To summarise, while the government must financially support science education, I do not believe that a nation's economy can be improved if the other components are ignored. It is necessary for equitable growth, that the government looks into all the aspects for the nation to prosper.

Sample 8:

One of the contentious concerns is that the government should invest more in coaching sciences than in other courses in order for the land to improve and progress. Some may believe that the programme should focus on imparting skills to help the individual develop. From my standpoint, I do not believe that investing money on application approaches is a waste of time for certain people.

It is commonly considered that paying more for scientific education than for other subjects like math and English aids in the development of a pleasant environment and helps to future well-paid employment. That may be true, but if the government invests in a variety of courses for students who dislike school, there are more benefits than taking a class in a subject they don't care about. Furthermore, students' learning in other classes makes them visually stunning for the survey.

As a result, according to scientific studies, some pupils may dislike learning, which may lead to poor educational achievements. As a result, students will squander time on a major that they do not want to study, slowing down their progress on the business that they have agreed to study. For example, if a student wants to be a lawyer, they should study about legal issues since it will help them grow as a professional because they might be a wonderful lawyer. Furthermore, a bucolic might benefit from learning in terms of digital and technology rather than talent, because technology is becoming increasingly important and widespread in the wild environment.

In conclusion, on the one hand, the government should pay for science education, which is required for the development of a rural area. On the other hand, Congress should assist those who are content to be educated in other subjects. Nowadays, there are numerous courses to develop the rustic, in my opinion. Science is an integral part of all lives, but it is definitely not the most important one. Overall developments can only be achieved if equal importance is given to all subjects. It is vital the government changes the education curriculum to the interests of students.

Sample 9:

There are differing viewpoints on whether governments should only focus on science education to aid their countries' development. While I agree that focusing on certain areas has advantages, I believe it is more important not to overlook other subjects.

I believe that focusing on science-related disciplines helps a country grow for a multitude of reasons. To begin with, many scientific advances rely largely on a thorough understanding of mathematics, physics, and chemistry. For example, experts in the area of medicine require a strong understanding of chemistry in order to conduct research and develop new medications. As a result, the teaching quality of these courses should be continually enhanced. Second, when students study science topics, they are required to solve a variety of issues, which might stimulate their creativity and inventiveness. Such talents are critical for developing technical advancements, which enable a country to acquire a competitive advantage over other countries. Advancement in science not just benefits the existing generation, it is for the greater good. Medicine is a field that has grown leaps and bounds which has helped solve a lot of medical issues. In India, the best study to show would be how science helped eradicate polio. Science has forever proven to be better than the best.

Despite the foregoing considerations, I believe that students should focus on other topics as well. International commerce contributes considerably to a country's growth in the age of globalisation. When there are linguistic hurdles, business with other countries becomes almost impossible. This means that the government should engage in foreign language education. In Singapore, for example, most people can speak English effectively since the school curriculum is heavily focused on the topic. Because Singaporeans are able to collaborate with individuals from all around the world, the country draws a lot of foreign investment. Business studies could help bring in a new generation of entrepreneurs. IIMs have an incubation centre that helps create business ideas. Science, however brilliant a subject, all the others are equally important.

To summarise, while I agree that government expenditure on science education aids a country's growth, I also feel that teaching topics such as foreign languages and business studies are essential.

Sample 10:

Many people believe that science education should be the core focus of government investments rather than other educational content. Most of the reasoning lies in the fact that scientific developments are considered to be the basis of all economic advancement. Though I agree with this opinion on the importance of science, I think all subjects should be treated as equals in the plans of the government.

It is understandable why science is held in such high regards by society as all industrial revolutions since the dawn of man have been the direct results of scientific breakthroughs. In each of these revolutions, humankind’s productivity has exponentially increased, leading to favourable economic booms. For example, the steam engine allowed people and goods to be transported further distances while electricity forever changed the manufacturing world. As a result, the demand for human resources in scientific fields has always been soaring. The private sector alone cannot satisfy this need, and the government must lend a helping hand in funding for the proliferation of science subjects in schools and universities.

However, it is wrong to assume that science has been the sole underlying source of progress. Aside from scientists, people from all backgrounds such as designers, marketers, and behavioural experts work together to turn an idea into reality. For example, although smartphone technologies were already developed in the 1990s, it is not until the late 2000s that smartphones’ sales exploded, all thanks to better and better designs. Therefore, the corresponding studies of designs, psychology, and other non-science subjects are no less critical to economic improvements. Furthermore, trained artists such as actors, singers, and musicians are vital in creating entertainment values that can satiate the society’s needs for happiness, avoiding depressions that can hamper growth. For a country to advance sustainably, the government cannot neglect the values of non-science fields.

In conclusion, both science and arts, when adequately invested, are the essential driving forces behind a well-developed country. The government should aggressively spend on the education of all subjects to maintain an all-rounded high-quality workforce, ready to tackle any challenges in the economy.

Sample 11:

Some people believe that more national funding should be allocated to the teaching of science subjects rather than other subjects because these disciplines could facilitate the growth of a country. This essay strongly disagrees with this opinion, asserting that a strong and flourishing country results from a combination of both humanities and science subjects.

There are valid reasons why some advocate for prioritizing science education. In the current technological landscape, science has paved the way for numerous breakthroughs that drive a country's development. For instance, America is renowned as a technological powerhouse, home to numerous tech giants such as Apple and Google. Such achievements are largely the result of massive investments in science and technology within their educational system. Similarly, countries such as China and Germany have also experienced remarkable growth due to similar investments in these fields. Therefore, it is undeniable that science significantly contributes to national development.

However, for a country to experience holistic development and long-term prosperity, humanities should also be invested in, with history being a prime example. When citizens are knowledgeable about their homeland’s origins and the endeavors of previous generations to unify the country, they develop a sense of patriotism. This patriotism is the foundation of the desire and effort to build and develop a country. Conversely, when people are ignorant about their country's history and have little gratitude towards the past, it is challenging for them to devote themselves to their homeland, potentially leading to issues like brain drain. Moreover, teaching international historical events is equally crucial. Insights into world wars or conflicts occurring in other parts of the world help people, especially the young generations, understand the value of peace, which is another essential groundwork for a developed and united country. Such knowledge can bolster people’s faith in their home country and encourage them to dedicate themselves to its development and protection. Humanities subjects like literature and philosophy also play a vital role in fostering critical thinking, empathy, and ethical reasoning, all of which are essential for well-rounded citizens.

In conclusion, while it is true that science and technology are vital for a country's progress, this essay argues that educational funding should not be disproportionately channeled into these fields at the expense of the humanities. A balanced approach that values both scientific and social subjects is crucial for fostering patriotism, critical thinking, and a comprehensive understanding of the world, which collectively form the foundation of a country's growth.

Sample 12:

There has been a growing debate about the importance of science education in comparison to other subjects. Some people argue that the government should invest more in the teaching of science, as it is vital for building a country’s prosperous future. While I agree that science education is essential, I believe that other subjects also play a significant role in a country's progress, so I disagree that government investment should go to science subjects more than others.

Science education is undoubtedly important as it provides students with the necessary skills and knowledge to tackle real-world problems. Firstly, science education is essential for innovation and technological advancement. It provides the necessary knowledge and skills for students to develop new technologies and products, which can lead to economic growth and improve the quality of life for citizens. Secondly, the challenges faced by humanity today require a strong foundation in scientific knowledge. Issues such as climate change, pandemics, and energy security require scientific expertise to address. By investing in science education, a country can equip its citizens with the necessary skills to tackle these challenges effectively.

However, I also believe that other subjects, such as humanities, social sciences, and languages, are equally important for a country's progress. These subjects help students develop critical thinking skills, creativity, and empathy, which are essential for success in many fields. For example, literature encourages creativity by exposing readers to new and imaginative ideas, concepts, and perspectives. This is essential in fields such as advertising, marketing, and entrepreneurship, where the ability to think outside the box and come up with innovative solutions is highly valued. Moreover, these subjects help students understand different cultures, languages, and perspectives, which can be invaluable in a globalized world. Additionally, history, geography, and languages can help students understand different cultures, traditions, and ways of life.

In conclusion, while I agree that science education is vital for a country's development and progress, I disagree that government funding should be prioritized for this subject over other subjects. Government investment should, therefore, be spread across a range of subjects to give a broad education to strengthen a country’s future development and progress.

Sample 13:

It is sometimes asserted that governments should prioritize investment in scientific disciplines over other subjects to foster their countries’ prosperity. I mostly agree with this assertion due to the significant impact of technological advancements on the economy and social development, although the economic benefits of other industries should not be underestimated.

The foremost rationale why I support increased government funding for the teaching of science subjects is the potential for economic gain. Specifically, tech giants are the primary drivers of wealth in the world’s most powerful economies. For instance, the top ten largest corporations in the United States predominantly comprise major technology companies like Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon. Therefore, governments should prioritize investment in science education to produce more engineers and scientists, who are essential for the establishment and growth of tech enterprises.

Another reason I support government funding for science education is the social impact of technological breakthroughs. In other words, the application of cutting-edge technology can effectively address issues that were once deemed unsolvable. A compelling example of this is China’s success in eradicating poverty in various rural areas. Technical organizations in China have provided low-cost internet connection devices to thousands of villages, enabling numerous farmers to sell their products on live-streaming platforms like Taobao, thereby lifting them out of poverty.

However, I acknowledge the contributions of non-technical fields. It is not uncommon for countries to achieve prosperity without relying solely on tech organizations. Thailand is an excellent example, as the country has invested heavily in educating students about their cultural heritage and the principles of sustainable tourism. This has led to a tourism boom in recent decades, significantly contributing to Thailand becoming the second wealthiest nation in Southeast Asia.

In conclusion, I largely support the idea of governments prioritizing the teaching of scientific subjects, as technological advancements can not only drive economic growth but also foster positive social change despite the economic contributions of other educational fields.

Sample 14:

A widely held perspective suggests that national governments should channel more resources into the teaching of science disciplines to bolster national development and advancement. While I acknowledge the crucial role that scientific education plays in societal progress, I contend that the significance of other academic fields should not be overlooked.

Undeniably, subjects such as physics, chemistry, and biology are fundamental to the evolution of a nation. These areas of study are instrumental in fostering innovative technologies, improving healthcare systems, and addressing pressing societal issues, such as climate change and public health crises. For example, countries that have made substantial investments in scientific education often witness remarkable technological breakthroughs and economic growth. This correlation illustrates that the enhancement of science education is vital for nurturing national progress and resilience.

However, it is crucial to recognize the value of other academic disciplines. Fields such as history, literature, and the arts play a significant role in developing critical thinking, creativity, and effective communication skills among students. These competencies are essential for understanding societal dynamics and appreciating human culture. For instance, the study of history not only teaches individuals to analyze past mistakes but also cultivates an awareness of civic responsibility. Meanwhile, literature encourages self-expression and fosters empathy, both of which are necessary for active citizenship. A well-rounded educational framework must cultivate a diverse workforce that includes not only scientists and engineers but also artists, historians, and philosophical thinkers.

Moreover, it is important to consider that not all students exhibit a preference for scientific subjects. Many individuals may possess a stronger affinity for disciplines such as music, sports, or entrepreneurial studies. If governments were to focus solely on science education, these students would likely experience a subpar educational experience that does not cater to their unique abilities and ambitions. Such a narrow educational approach could ultimately impede progress across various fields that are vital for a comprehensive strategy for national development.

In conclusion, while it is clear that science subjects hold significant importance for a country’s advancement, other fields of study equally deserve recognition and investment. National governments should aim to promote a balanced approach by allocating resources to all academic disciplines, thereby ensuring that students acquire a diverse skill set that contributes to holistic growth and development across multiple sectors of society.

Sample 15:

Some argue that governments should allocate more resources to teaching science-based subjects rather than other disciplines to ensure national development and progress. However, I firmly believe that prioritizing science education over other subjects is not the most effective approach.

Firstly, focusing solely on science subjects could lead to a narrow-minded educational system that neglects the holistic development of students. Science and technology are undoubtedly crucial for economic growth and innovation, but subjects like literature, history, and the arts play an equally important role in fostering creativity, critical thinking, and cultural awareness. For instance, countries like Japan, which has a well-rounded education system, have managed to achieve technological advancements while also preserving their rich cultural heritage. This demonstrates that a balanced approach to education, where science and humanities coexist, is more beneficial for a country’s overall progress.

Secondly, interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for addressing complex global challenges, which often require a blend of scientific knowledge and insights from social sciences, ethics, and policy studies. For example, tackling climate change not only involves understanding scientific data but also requires economic strategies, ethical considerations, and public policy initiatives. By investing in a diverse range of subjects, governments can equip students with the necessary skills to approach problems from multiple perspectives, leading to more comprehensive and sustainable solutions.

In conclusion, I completely disagree with the notion that governments should prioritize science education over other subjects. A well-rounded education that includes both science and non-science subjects is vital for fostering creativity, critical thinking, and interdisciplinary collaboration, all of which are necessary for a nation’s development and progress.

Sample 16:

Some people hold a belief that governments should spend more money on teaching science topics than other subjects. In my opinion, I will change this school of thought.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that undeveloped and developing countries need scientific inventions to enhance their development. One example of these countries is Viet Nam, whose economy has grown significantly by applying mechanization to its agriculture. This is because farmers can boost their productivity and harvest a better crop, which helps them earn more money by using mechanical engines. Moreover, in the age of science and technology, people can quickly get a well-paid job both in their region and overseas if they have been trained in good technological skills in their school. Undoubtedly, with the economic growth and the increase in GDP, the residents will have a thorough life, and the governments will have an opportunity to develop other things.

On the other hand, unlike the nations above, which depend on the available machines, developed nations depend mostly on innovations to expand their development. This puts a force on schools to teach students other subjects to stimulate students' creativity. One example of this type of education is America's education, where pupils can choose the subjects attached to their ability. As a result, this country achieved numerous scientific achievements and innovations, which were devoted to improving other subjects. In conclusion, the aforementioned analyses make me conclude that it is wiser action for undeveloped countries and developing countries to allocate funds for science education than developed countries.

Sample 1:

The notion that sports competitions inevitably lead to emotional stress for young people, guaranteeing a complete ban on their participation, is a misconception that fails to acknowledge the numerous benefits they provide. While it is true that competitive sports can generate pressure and anxiety, these are often outweighed by the positive impacts on physical, mental, and social development.

Firstly, competitive sports can instill valuable life skills and foster resilience in young people. The pressure to perform and the potential for failure in competitions can act as a catalyst for developing coping mechanisms and building resilience. Learning to manage stress, overcome setbacks, and persevere in the face of adversity are essential skills that will benefit young people throughout their lives, both on and off the field. Moreover, competitive sports promote teamwork, discipline, and a strong work ethic, qualities that are highly valued in all aspects of life.

Furthermore, participating in sports competitions can contribute significantly to a young person’s physical and mental well-being. Engaging in regular physical activity is essential for promoting physical health and reducing the risk of chronic diseases. Moreover, sports can boost self-esteem, improve mood, and reduce stress levels. The endorphin rush experienced during exercise can have a positive impact on mental health, providing a sense of accomplishment and well-being.

In conclusion, while sports competitions can certainly generate pressure and anxiety for young people, the potential for stress should not be viewed as an insurmountable obstacle. The numerous benefits of participation, including the development of essential life skills, improved physical and mental well-being, and the fostering of social connections, far outweigh the potential downsides. Therefore, banning young people from participating in sports competitions would be a detrimental decision that would deprive them of invaluable opportunities for growth and development.

Sample 2:

I completely disagree with the parochial notion that youngsters should not be permitted to play sports as competition makes them emotionally stressed. There are a number of arguments that support my view, which I will be putting forth in the upcoming paragraphs.

Tacitly, there are numerous benefits of competing in sports. Such competitions promote skills like self-confidence, team spirit, developing strategies, overcoming obstacles and so on. Admittedly there is a feeling of competitiveness that can cause some amount of emotional stress. However, that is not just limited to the field of sports. Competition is there in every aspect of life, starting with school life and continuing onto when we start working. Rather sports events teach the youth how to overcome challenges, accept failures and keep trying to succeed, which helps them overcome obstacles in their lives as well.

To add to it, sport is a very popular career option for many youngsters. Through the state-level and national-level sporting competitions, the best of the talent can be identified. These youngsters can then move on to competing at an international level and bring name and fame to the country. The government also provides job opportunities to the sport laureates. Furthermore, such competitions promote harmony when people and teams from different cultures, countries and backgrounds compete with one another and strengthen relationships.

The proponents of the view that the youth should not be permitted to participate in sport competitions say that the pressures of winning are too demanding for the players and lead to deleterious consequences, like the win-at-all-cost attitude, not being able to accept failure, drug abuse for better performance, etc. However, this kind of stress is faced by children every day at schools and competing in sports only helps them become more confident and tough enough to face the challenges they face in their personal and professional lives.

To sum up, the children and the youth should be encouraged to participate in sport competitions, to promote their overall development and to inculcate in them life skills, like self-confidence, sportsmanship spirit, feeling of fraternity and many more. I am certain when done in a purposeful and developmentally appropriate manner, which places the needs of the children well ahead of winning, competitive sports can and should be a great experience for kids.

Sample 3:

Playing and competing in sports is a very common activity in any young person’s life. Some people opine to not let youth participate in sports competitions as the stress of competing might affect them emotionally. Although this doesn’t seem very logical, this essay shall elaborate both these views and present a personal stand.

There is no doubt that there is a high amount of tension involved in and around sports competitions. Every participant is under tremendous pressure to win the tournament. Experienced sportsmen may be used to such pressure and intensity, but the young players may not be. They might be heavily disheartened if they lose any match, which might take a toll on their confidence and mental condition. Not to mention, the media sometimes makes a big deal out of every victory and defeat, so as to make the sportsman feel more harassed and stressed about his performance. This is why the people who believe youth should be banned from participating in sports competitions say so.

In disagreement, I believe sports competitions make a young person stronger and determined in life. Competitions teach us how to accept defeat gracefully. They teach us how to work in pressurized conditions, giving our best outcome. Competitions assess our level of expertise and motivate us to keep excelling in our field of sport. Sure, nobody likes to lose, but I do not believe defeat can make anyone too stressed to participate at all. If given proper guidance while training – physical as well as psychological – the youth might not be as troubled by stress of competitions as it is being depicted. There are emotional setbacks in every phase of life; banning oneself from facing the situation is not the answer.

To sum up, I disagree with youth being banned from taking part in sports competitions. There would not be any fear of youth suffering from emotional stress in sports competitions if they are given proper psychological training also, enabling them to handle stress effectively.

Sample 4:

While competition almost always has an inherent degree of stress associated with it, this is not always necessarily a negative thing. In fact, it can be used to develop essential life skills in young people. Prohibiting young people from participating in sports competitions would seem to be a misguided idea at best, and possibly extremely damaging, for the long-term development of youth.

Young people naturally learn about the concept of competition from many aspects of their daily lives. From watching their favorite soccer team or following the most popular music artist; the concepts of ‘the best’, ‘the most popular’ or ‘the most successful’ all carry with them the spirit of competing against others in order to become better than others, in whichever field.

Therefore, there is little evidence that prohibiting young people from competing in sports events would be a positive move in terms of their development as individuals. Apart from this, if the objection is that sports competitions are a source of emotional stress and the aim is to reduce the amount of stress that young people experience, then it would also make sense to prohibit young people from taking academic exams and other such tests, which effectively are a competition, and very likely are a greater source of stress than any sport they might be involved in. Moreover, importantly, most academic testing is compulsory in most countries whereas participation in sports competitions is entirely voluntary; therefore, the concept appears to be flawed from the outset.

In addition, an integral part of growing up is learning how to become a well-rounded and productive member of society and acquire the necessary life skills to thrive in the adult world. As many aspects of adult life involve an element of competition, from competing to obtain employment, a promotion, or even distinguish yourself in your career, it would seem senseless to try and shield youngsters from the fact that competitive stress is a part of life, and in fact can be a motivating factor to excel and do well in life.

In conclusion, personally, I feel that the notion of a ban on young people participating in competitive sports events is not in the best interests of young people in general and has little overall merit.

Sample 5:

Sports are inevitably the most important category among most young people. Some of the masses are convinced that participation in championships is only harmful to the development of youth; at the same time, others believe that adolescence under the pressure of events is necessary for future progress. My insight is that youth should be encouraged to take advantage of the opportunity to train while competing with other young athletes.

Sports undoubtedly bring enormous benefits. Firstly, they encourage children's determination and aspirations. Under the pressure of competition, youth can not only get the opportunity to brush up on their athletic skills, but also improve their problem-solving skills. For example, basketball players will never be able to realize their potential without matches with other players. In addition, competitions force offspring to become accustomed to a healthier life. Ultimately, this will give them the incentive to be more responsible, self-disciplined and have precious goals in this earthly life.

It is important to teach teenagers to be fully accepted by society, and competitive sports is perhaps the most pragmatic method. The experience and problem-solving skills that are carefully trained during matches will become a liability when young students are given more responsibilities as they grow. Thinking logically is essential in any aspect of life, which can be trained through the contest of chess or checkers. For example, children who have experience in playing chess appear to perform better at Math and qualitative analysis than normal students. To sum up, halting offspring from attending contests is nothing but inhibiting them from becoming more consummate adults.

In conclusion, we note that the participation of adolescents in sports competitions is very important for the overall development of children. Therefore, the government and education systems should conduct more activities and competitions to improve future results.

Sample 6:

It is believed by some that participation in competitive sports creates mental stress among the youth, and so they should be forbidden to take part in sports competitions. While competitive sports can cause some stress, I believe that sports competitions are essential for young people and teach them important life skills.

Admittedly, there is a feeling of competitiveness that can cause some amount of emotional stress. Sometimes the pressures of winning are too demanding for the players and lead to deleterious consequences, like the win-at-all-cost attitude, not being able to accept failure, drug abuse for better performance, etc.

However, competition is not just limited to the field of sports. It is there in every aspect of life, starting with school life, and continuing onto when people start working. Sports competitions teach the youth how to overcome challenges, accept failures and keep trying to succeed, which helps them overcome other obstacles in their lives as well. Such competitions also promote skills like self- confidence, team spirit, developing strategies, overcoming obstacles, and so on.

To add to it, sport is a very popular career option for many youngsters. Through the state-level and national-level sporting competitions, the best of the talent can be identified. These youngsters can then move on to competing at an international level and bring name and fame to the country. The government also provides job opportunities to the sport laureates. Furthermore, such competitions promote harmony, when people and teams from different cultures, countries and backgrounds compete with one another and strengthen relationships.

To sum up, the children and the youth should be encouraged to participate in sport competitions, to promote their overall development, and to inculcate in them the life skills, like self-confidence, sportsmanship spirit, feeling of fraternity and many more.

Sample 7:

There are different views about taking part in sport competitions. Some say that sport competitions are too stressful a process, and it should be banned for young people. I do not agree that young people’s sport competitions should be prohibited. In this essay, I will spell out the reasons why I disagree with this statement.

To begin with, sports activities enable children to be healthy and keep fit. Especially, children can find interest in sports activities by competing games with other people such as baseball or soccer games. Sport competitions allow youth to keep taking part in sports and maintain them to be healthy physically and mentally. For example, baseball or soccer games are based on team competitions. While young people are playing these games with others, they can learn teamwork and cooperation. Even though one person is the best performer in the team, they cannot win the game without teamwork and other people’s help. Children will understand this process naturally while they are participating in sport competitions.

Secondly, sport competitions encourage young people to succeed. Winning or losing is the natural process in life. Children can acquire this process by competing in sports games with others. If they lost the game, it could be new stimulation that makes them practice harder. Youth can make better scores when they compete with others. For instance, if they run alone, they might feel exhausted quickly and it will affect their result. By competing with other pupils, they can motivate each other. As a result, it will boost the young’s capabilities, and it will be beneficial for them to achieve their aims.

In conclusion, although sport competitions can be stressful activities for young people, I strongly believe that it should not be banned because these have more benefits for them. Young children can learn teamwork and the way to step forward for their future through the sport competitions.

Sample 8:

While it’s true that sport competitions can be intense and may evoke emotional stress in some individuals, advocating for a ban on youth participation seems like an extreme measure. I disapprove of the idea as engaging in sports competitions offers numerous benefits that contribute to the overall development and well-being of young people and prepare them to wear the stress of life.

Firstly, sports competitions provide an avenue for physical activity, promoting a healthy lifestyle and helping combat the rising issues of sedentary behavior and obesity among the youth. Regular physical exercise has been linked to improved cardiovascular health, enhanced motor skills, and increased overall fitness. Banning youth from sports competitions might deprive them of these essential health benefits.

Secondly, participation in sports fosters important life skills such as teamwork, discipline, and resilience. In a competitive environment, young athletes learn how to collaborate with others, follow rules, and cope with both victories and defeats. These experiences contribute to their personal growth and help build character, preparing them for the challenges they may face later in life.

Moreover, sports competitions can be a source of joy, motivation, and a sense of achievement for young individuals. The thrill of competition often acts as a powerful motivator, encouraging them to set goals, work hard, and strive for excellence. The satisfaction of reaching a personal or team goal can have a positive impact on their self-esteem and confidence.

Lastly, banning youth from sports competitions might inadvertently lead to a decrease in overall interest in physical activities. By fostering a competitive spirit, we encourage a culture of active living and healthy competition, which can have a positive ripple effect on society as a whole.

To recapitulate, instead of an outright ban, a more balanced approach involves ensuring that sports competitions are structured in a way that prioritizes the well-being of young participants.

Sample 1:

While the general role of school is widely recognised, the deeper debate on education philosophy still concerns its primary focus. Some people argue that school is supposed to produce useful citizens and workers for the future instead of catering for individuals’ benefits. I totally agree with this viewpoint.

To begin with, school, being the mainstay of education, is tasked with cultivating a well-behaved and well-informed population. As such, it should prioritise equipping students with relevant knowledge, skills and charisma to thrive in their future career and, more broadly, society. Since children spend the first formative years at school, they should be advised on how to tell right from wrong and perceive and react to the outside world properly. Put differently, school plays a key role in instilling discipline, morality and integrity in the future generations of the population and workforce. Moreover, schools are to ensure proper training to enable children to succeed in the job market. In the end, education helps people make a living later in life, while it also provides manpower for economic growth. How well students can integrate into and contribute to society is clear evidence of schools’ success.

In contrast, benefiting students as individuals should not be the primary function of school. This is because an individualistic approach does not serve, if not distorts, the education orientation of school. Heavy emphasis on individual needs can lead students to care solely about self-interest, whereby they become self-centred and selfish. The promotion of individuality can colour education, turning this sacred work into a commercial commodity which students buy for their personal use and schools sell for profit. In those cases, schools would fail to realise their initial educational mission.

In conclusion, the priority of school should be turning children into good citizens and workers instead of serving individuals’ needs since it helps construct a functioning and harmonious society where everything else is built upon.

Sample 2:

Education has long played a vital role in any individual’s development. It is argued by many that the main purpose of schooling is to train young individuals to be capable citizens and workers for society. However, I totally disagree with such a perspective by arguing that education would mainly contribute to individuals’ fulfillment.

One reason for my disappointment is that practical motivations for attending schools exceed far beyond the rigid system of employment and social standard toward good citizens due to individuals’ distinctiveness. As each person first develops and showcases his own unique characteristics, abilities and passions before forming a part of the broader communities, the mission of education should be to unleash and empower individuals’ potential. With proper studying, children are equipped with essential knowledge, dynamic skills, and a critical mindset so as to utilize their capability to the fullest, thereby pursuing their self-selected vocation. In this way, all children can grow up becoming good citizens in terms of their ethical values and contributions to society, as they have been allowed and facilitated to freely fulfill their life goals, without external efforts in shaping children into molds of typical citizens or workers.

Another point is that schooling should aim for wider objectives in catering for and maximizing individuals’ development. Specifically, apart from citizenship and employment, educational institutions aim to nurture the holistic development and well-being of individuals, therefore fostering pupil’s personal growth in order to reach a fulfilling and balanced future life. Such self-discoveries would eventually shape a sense of identity and intrapersonal intelligence within each student as well as their intrapersonal intelligence, which would eventually enable them to make informed decisions and lead meaningful lives in the long run. Finland’s education system stands out as a prime example that cultivates students’ intellectual and emotional well-being by fostering their creativity, curiosity, and independent thinking, empowering them to be able to navigate an ever-changing world and achieve life fulfillment.

In conclusion, I am completely convinced that the primary goals of education are to facilitate individuals’ growth and enable them to realize their potential towards life fulfillment. During such a process, people would naturally become responsible citizens and capable workers, which should be a less important objective of schooling.

Sample 3:

The primary aim of education should be to mold students into responsible citizens and competent workers rather than merely focusing on individual benefits. I completely agree with this viewpoint, as prioritizing the development of good citizens and workers ensures societal well-being and national progress.

Firstly, educating children to become good citizens is crucial for the development of a harmonious and progressive society. Schools play a significant role in instilling values such as honesty, integrity, and social responsibility. By focusing on these values, the education system fosters a sense of community and cooperation among individuals. For instance, if doctors only prioritize personal gain over the welfare of patients, achieving equitable healthcare would be impossible. Therefore, a focus on citizenship within education promotes collective well-being and discourages selfish behavior.

Secondly, preparing students to be competent workers is essential for the economic growth and stability of a nation. Governments invest substantial resources in the education system with the expectation that it will produce a skilled and morally grounded workforce. If schools were to solely emphasize personal gain, the broader societal benefits would be undermined. The example of Finland’s education system illustrates this well. Finland emphasizes holistic development alongside academic preparation, fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and moral values. This approach has led to a well-rounded and effective education system that benefits both individuals and society at large.

In conclusion, the primary purpose of education should be to develop good citizens and skilled workers. This focus not only benefits individuals but also ensures the overall progress and stability of society.

Sample 4:

The main purpose of schools is a subject of continuous discussion, with some asserting that schools primarily aim to mold children into responsible citizens and effective workers, while others contend that their chief goal is to benefit children on an individual level. I partly agree that schools are primarily intended to transform children into good citizens and workers.

On the one hand, schools undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping children into responsible citizens and productive workers. Firstly, through civic education, children learn about their rights and responsibilities, fostering a sense of community and societal involvement. In fact, schools teach essential social skills, such as teamwork and communication, which are vital in the workplace. Therefore, the structured environment of schools helps instill a strong work ethic, preparing children for the demands of the professional world.

On the other hand, schools also significantly benefit children on an individual level. Firstly, education promotes personal development by encouraging students to explore their interests and passions. Critical thinking skills, developed through various subjects, enable students to analyze and solve problems effectively, which is invaluable in both personal and professional contexts. Moreover, schools provide opportunities for children to nurture their creativity and talents, whether in the arts, sports, or academics, leading to a well-rounded and fulfilling life.

In conclusion, schools serve a dual purpose by preparing children to be good citizens and competent workers while also significantly contributing to their individual growth and development.

Sample 5:

Many are of the opinion that the primary role of schools is to create good citizens, instead of simply working towards individual betterment. In my opinion, schools should aim to elevate the individual, not impose conformity.

Those in favor of this statement argue the value of a well-functioning society. As the world develops and there are advances in medicine, safety, working conditions, and so on it is easy to forget that this level of comfort requires sacrifices for the common good. Individuals must work at companies to stimulate the economy, and the public must have a basic sense of community in order to live peaceably with one’s neighbors. School is where this education can begin. Teachers can explicitly and implicitly guide students to socially beneficial behaviors and educate them well enough to establish a viable future career.

However, I would argue that focusing on the individual will accomplish the goals detailed above but also be mentally healthier. Students who are taught to share, work well in teams, and develop their talents will contribute to society as a byproduct of pursuing their own seemingly selfish interests. Moreover, there may be times when the focus on society will come at the cost of the mental health of individuals. For instance, students who are taught to withhold their personal viewpoints in school, as is common in many authoritarian nations, may harbor resentment and not feel they can fully express themselves in a free environment. Psychological research has shown that the key to healthy growth is feeling safe to express oneself without fear of reprisals and repercussions.

In conclusion, although there is a valid argument in favor of social stability, schools should aim to produce healthy, industrious individuals. Naturally, these goals are not mutually exclusive, and the overlap should be emphasized.

Sample 6:

There are arguments about whether educational institutions have a greater duty to prepare students for the workforce or to help them recognize their own benefits. Although I agree with this sentiment, I also believe that teaching children to be self-serving individuals is crucial.

Needless to add, schools are essential for teaching subjects and developing skills that prepare students to be effective members of society and employees. Teachers are unquestionably the ones that help kids learn the difference between right and wrong and how to choose the correct course in life. Children can develop moral principles and an understanding of the need to be decent citizens if they have thoroughly learned moral lessons. Moreover, from the beginning of time, the school's duty is to equip its pupils with both the necessary academic knowledge and real-world skills to be creative and intelligent workers in the workforce. After all, the purpose of education is to improve people's understanding of one another.

Schools, on the other hand, should benefit children as individuals because these institutions are critical in assisting children to emotionally develop and realize their full potential. For starters, youngsters encourage early social connection with peers at school, which allows them to form friendships and camaraderie. As a result, these social encounters have been shown to be beneficial in helping the progression of interior emotion and feeling. Furthermore, through subject learning at educational establishments, children have more opportunities to expose themselves to diverse fields, which will help them find their likes and dislikes. In this method, schools achieve their goal of fostering pupils' strengths and addressing their flaws.

In conclusion, while it is true that the primary goal of schools should be to prepare children to be productive citizens and workers, I believe that educational institutions should also help students to benefit themselves.

Sample 7:

Some claim that the sole purpose of schools should be to turn young people into upstanding citizens and workers, while others argue that schools should focus on improving them as people. Though the former notion can certainly benefit children individually, I would assert that nurturing children into upstanding citizens and workers is of greater importance.

It is reasonable to argue that schools should aid children in their personal development. Firstly, teachers are trained to assist children in understanding their individual strengths and weaknesses and can subsequently encourage them to build on or refine these attributes. Thus, teachers are well-positioned to aid children’s individual development. Secondly, lessons and extracurricular activities are particularly conducive to school children in building their confidence as individuals. This can occur by having them participate in subjects or activities that they initially are weak in and after extensive learning and practice, they can become self-assured in their ability to tackle novel challenges. Hence their personal psychological growth can be bolstered effectively.

However, schools must take the responsibility for preparing children to enter the workforce and operate within a community. Since children will someday become a part of a society, they will need to be educated in the practical skills and ethical standards needed to thrive within it as contributing citizens. To give an example, in Germany during secondary school, children are given vocational training in various occupational fields such as mechanics and engineering to prepare them for future work. In addition, they are also taught ethics to instill in them a sense of right and wrong and thus they are more likely to behave responsibly towards others.

In conclusion, while schools can be beneficial in terms of building on their innate attributes and developing confidence, I contend it is more important for schools to prioritize their social purpose of cultivating children into moral citizens and workers who can flourish in the adult world.

Sample 8:

Schools are perceived as the lighthouse of a country, and if education is the foundation of a country, then schools are where it should be established. Academies’ primary goal is a never-ending argument, though. I concur that a school’s primary goal should be to develop students into ethical, morally upright individuals committed to assisting society, rather than turning them into avaricious, self-serving money-making machines by assisting them individually merely to be prepared for employment. In the following paragraphs, I shall elaborate on my opinion.

Education’s initial goal is primarily to create an educated society where morals, honesty, and integrity will play a significant role. They would cast aside their own goals to work together for the nation’s sake. A school’s main goal should be to nurture students’ morals and positive character traits while also preparing them for jobs that will benefit society because schools are places where children’s education is taken care of. For instance, universal healthcare would only be a distant dream if skilled and experienced doctors treated patients solely out of financial consideration. Therefore, we should concentrate on improving our educational system, particularly what we educate our youngsters, to create a country where people would help one another rather than become money-making machines.

Moreover, states make significant financial investments to maintain their educational infrastructure. This spending is funded mainly by taxes. In this perspective, the entire educational system would fail if schools adopted an educational system where instructors’ only goal is to educate students on how to gain from employment or enterprises individually. When educating our children, we must use extreme caution. What we educate them while they are young will mold them; thus, it will be quite worrying if schools don’t prepare them to be perfect citizens. Additionally, the primary motivations for sending kids to school shouldn’t be for personal gain, stellar grades, or a brighter future. They should attend schools to become enlightened members of society.

Meanwhile, there is debate over whether education should help children express their uniqueness by fostering their abilities in the arts, music, athletics, or other areas. Although these factors are significant, schools should focus on civic and vocational education since nations want a larger pool of competent workers and more responsible citizens.

In conclusion, the real goal of our schools should be to produce ideal citizens and devoted employees. The way we educate our children in schools affects the larger good of society, a country’s bright and prosperous future, and the individual accomplishments of people. Thus, our education should put a strong emphasis on morality and quality.

Sample 9:

Irrefutable, alma mater plays a crucial role in everyone’s life, owing to which it is generally argued whether the primary purpose of the school is to become a scholar or a social worker. I largely disagree with the notion because schools should teach ethics and enhance skills.

To commence, there are myriad reasons why the school’s motive is to teach ethics to learners. This is because, provided that, the institute should teach moral principles to the students. So, they behave properly with their loved ones rather than in abusive behaviour. Take Canada as an epitome, which showed approximately 78 % of the school should teach moral education to their children as good citizens. As a result, it is a justified boon for them.

Another benefit of the school is that it also enhances different skills, as the institute plays an indispensable role in holistic development. In other words, because of teachers in the education centre, children learn various lessons which are fruitful for the development of mankind. In 2016, the headline of BBC British Broadline company revealed that nearly 56% of the population learnt skills from their school that benefit their life. Consequently, it is constructive development for them.

On the other hand, some people opine that the very purpose of the school is to convert the child into good social citizens. To elaborate more, schools encourage children in order to become social workers as they assist needy individuals in their life. Besides this, it is also beneficial for their not solely motor skills ability but also physical development. Therefore, it is a positive epoch for them.

Having concluded, although the motive of the education centre is for students to become social workers, due to the institute, aspirants acquire various kinds of knowledge and learn ethics.

Sample 10:

Schools play a crucial role in building a path towards establishing a student’s identity as a person. The development of the education system over the years has determined the standards of the nation and its work culture. This essay supports the thought that the education system should focus on mentoring students to be good individuals that will ultimately make them good citizens and employees.

The ancient Indian schooling system was ideal for the training of the pupil. Their childhood used to go to boarding schools known as Gurukul. Unlike today’s teaching methodology, knowledge was transformed by several theoretical and practical means. Children used to be trained to face real-life challenges by the time they left Gurukul. Their passing criteria were not only the knowledge of the subject but also understanding its morals and application of it in real life. This system focused on the student’s individual growth, subconsciously turning them into better in every aspect of life.

On the other hand, today’s teaching is protocoled and monotonous and does not awaken students’ consciousness. Therefore, particular emphasis is given to social etiquette so that they can survive in modern society. Students’ individuality is not taken into account there, for this system fails when it comes to the ultimate formation of excellent and healthy institutions for living. To elaborate, scholars of the school times are rewarded with good pay and designations, and they prove their professional expertise successfully. Still, most of their personal lives are ruined due to their lack of knowledge of moral education, which is essential in building their personality.

To conclude, it is intensely disagreeable that to education system practising social norms over the individuality of the system.

Sample 11:

Schools are considered to be the lighthouse of a nation, and if education is the backbone of a nation, schools are the place to build it. However, the main objective of academies is a never-ending debate. I agree that a school's main purpose should be to turn students into honest and good citizens and making them ready to work for society instead of turning them into selfish money-making machines by helping them individually just to be ready to get a job.

First, the main purpose of education is to build up an enlightened nation where morality, honesty and integrity would be the key characteristics. They would keep aside their personal ambitions and work together for the betterment of the country. Since a school is a place where pupils' education is taken care of, its chief objective should be to focus on nurturing morality and good human characteristics among the students while also preparing them for their careers that would benefit society. To exemplify, if talented and experienced doctors treat patients only for the money, healthcare for all would be a distant dream. So, to build a nation where people will help each other instead of turning into money-making machines, we should focus on our education system, especially what we teach our children.

Second, states spend a lot of money to keep the schools and their education system running. A major portion of this spending comes from tax money. From this regard, if schools plan to adopt an education system where teachers’ sole purpose would be to teach children how to be personally benefitted from jobs or businesses, the whole education system would collapse. We have to be very careful while educating our children. What we teach them in their early stages would shape them, and if the schools fail to teach them to become ideal citizens, it would be a great concern in the future. Moreover, personal benefits, good grades and a better career should not be the main reasons children attend schools. They should attend schools to become enlightened members of society.

In conclusion, making ideal citizens and dedicated workers should be the true objective of our schools. The greater good of society, the bright and prosperous future of a nation, and the personal achievements of individuals are connected with the way we teach our children in schools and that is why our education should focus on morality and quality.

Sample 12:

Opinions are divided on whether the ultimate responsibility of educational institutions is shaping students into productive citizens or fostering the awareness of individual advantages. While I agree with this idea, I also think that it is of paramount importance to train children as people who gain for themselves.

It goes without saying that schools play a pivotal role in teaching disciplines and training skills that turn students into productive citizens and workers. Teachers, undoubtedly, are those who guide children in differentiating between right and wrong as well as leading them to take the right path in life. Once moral lessons are fully obtained, children can be principled and aware of the significance of being good citizens. Also, since the dawn of time, the primary function of education is to enhance the understanding of people; thus, it is the schools’ responsibility to provide their students with essential knowledge as well as practical skills to be intellectual and become innovative workers in the job market.

However, schools should benefit children as individuals because these institutes are crucial in helping children to emotionally develop and unleash their potential. Firstly, children promote their early social interaction with peers at school, via which they can foster friendships and companionship. Thus, these social contacts are proven to be helpful in assisting the advancement of internal emotion as well as feeling. Besides, through subjects learning at educational establishments, children have more chances to expose themselves to various fields, which would accordingly help them discover their likes and dislikes. In this way, schools’ aim is achieved in terms of nourishing students’ strengths and improving their weaknesses.

In conclusion, although it is said that the major function of schools should be training children to become productive citizens and laborers, I would agree that educational institutions ought to fulfill their duty by helping students to gain benefits for themselves.

Sample 13:

While some people argue that the primary purpose of schools is to create good citizens and productive workers, this essay will challenge this notion by emphasizing the importance of individual growth and development within the educational process.

Firstly, schools play a crucial role in fostering the intellectual and creative development of students. This growth is not merely to benefit society but to allow each student to reach their full potential. By providing a diverse range of subjects and learning experiences, schools can help students discover and nurture their passions, interests, and talents. For example, consider a school that offers a wide array of courses, including arts, sciences, humanities, and physical education, allowing their students to explore various subjects and identify areas where their passions and talents lie. This diverse education encourages critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills, which can lead to individual fulfillment and a sense of purpose.

In addition to academic development, schools should also prioritize the emotional and social growth of students. Emotional intelligence and social skills are essential for personal well-being and success in various aspects of life, including relationships and career progression. By creating a supportive and inclusive learning environment, schools can help students develop empathy, resilience, and effective communication skills. These qualities not only contribute to a healthy society but also directly benefit the individuals who possess them, improving their overall quality of life. For instance, schools can implement programs and activities that promote emotional intelligence and social skills, such as group projects, peer mentoring, and conflict resolution workshops. These programs encourage self-awareness, social awareness, responsible decision-making, and relationship management.

In conclusion, while the development of good citizens and productive workers is a valuable goal for schools, I disagree that this is the ultimate goal of schools, and it should not overshadow the importance of individual growth and development.

Sample 14:

The role of schools in shaping the future generation has been a subject of debate for decades. While some argue that schools should primarily focus on moulding children into responsible citizens and productive workers, others claim that the individual development of students should take precedence. 

There is merit in the belief that schools should prioritise instilling qualities that contribute to aspects of citizenship and work. Good education plays a pivotal role in cultivating a sense of civic responsibility, fostering values such as honesty, empathy, and social awareness. Promoting these values is clearly desirable as they could perhaps reduce social issues, such as crime and anti-social behaviour. Moreover, a workforce consisting of diligent and productive individuals drives economic growth and prosperity, again an important benefit for all.

However, focusing solely on societal benefits neglects essential aspects of child development. Young children these days appear to be experiencing higher levels of mental health, such as depression and eating disorders, meaning it is critical to do what is necessary to help each child feel confident within themselves and able to cope with the world we live in today. Schools should, therefore, strive to create an environment that encourages self-discovery and personal growth. Furthermore, personal fulfilment leads to happier, more engaged citizens who are more likely to participate actively in society without schools having to specifically set out to achieve this.

In conclusion, while the goal of schools should indeed involve shaping responsible citizens and productive workers, this objective should not overshadow the significance of individual development. Balancing both aspects ensures that students not only contribute positively to society but also experience personal growth and fulfilment.

Sample 15:

It is argued that the primary objective of schools is to transform children into responsible citizens and employees, instead of providing benefit individually. This essay agrees with this statement because it teaches children the duties of countrymen and it aids them to be ready for future jobs in the market.

Firstly, schools teach children the ethics of responsible citizens in the class. In this way, a strong bond of brotherhood is instilled among children without caring about their race and religion. This leads to children are more likely to live with peace and harmony, when they become adults. For example, in Canada school teachers are told to put an emphasis on teaching duties of a good citizen, and this helped country to have a good reputation of living with peace and harmony.

Secondly, the main objective of schools is to provide the education that would help them in the future, when they start working in the industry. Therefore, subjects related to future jobs should be taught and it will make them ready for the future workforce. To illustrate, in India, during school days subjects related to different types of work are included to make students aware about the different technologies so that they become familiar to the field they want to opt and get jobs in the future.

In conclusion, turning school children into responsible residents and employees is the main responsibility of schools because it teaches them ethics required by a citizen and teaching subjects related to jobs enables them to be ready for future jobs.

Sample 16:

Schools play a very important role in the lives of young children. Many people believe that schools are responsible for teaching their students to become good and responsible citizens of the country. I am completely in favour of this argument.

Children spend a lot of time in schools. Thus, it is the responsibility of every institution to imbibe feelings of empathy, honesty and morality in each child. If these feelings are properly nurtured, the children will definitely grow up to become responsible citizens of the nation and would try to contribute to its growth and development. These children would try to show their appreciation by giving back whatever they can to the country. For example, many children would join the National School Scouts and help in providing aid to the regions that have been affected by natural calamities like floods and earthquakes.

On the other hand, the Government invests a huge sum of the tax-payer’s money in the education of the young minds of the nation. It also provides free education to the children belonging to underprivileged families. Thus, if the schools raise selfish and greedy children who are willing to exploit the nation for their own personal benefits, then, the entire education system would collapse. It would ultimately have a negative impact on the people of that nation. Criminal activities including corruption would be on the rise and economic development would be negligible. For example, if talented doctors of a nation simply treat patients with an aim of making money, then, many poor people might not be able to receive any sort of healthcare due to lack of resources. Thus, the doctors are putting the lives of these poor patients at risk. Ultimately, it is the society that will suffer from the consequences.

In conclusion, it can be said that it is the moral responsibility of each and every school to encourage feelings of responsibility and empathy in the children, so that they can become good and enlightened citizens of the nation in the future.

Sample 17:

Undoubtedly, all schools have a moral responsibility of raising children to become good and responsible citizens of the nation. However, in my opinion, it should not be done at the cost of their individuality.

The children spend an extensive part of their childhood in schools. Therefore, schools must always encourage the children to explore their creativity and make use of it. The development of a child’s personality has a positive impact on both the individual and the nation. For example, most of the leaders of the country were creative thinkers, poets, scientists and artists. Thus, if the schools fail to encourage independent thinking and creativity among the children, then the nation will suffer as a whole.

Encouraging the children to develop their own personalities does not necessarily make them irresponsible citizens of the country. It also does not prove the level of patriotism they have for their own country. For example, some of the greatest patriots of history were independent and creative thinkers.

Schools should always find scope to develop the personality of the children because it helps in boosting their confidence. For example, according to a survey published by CNN in 2014, educated people tend to be more successful and self-confident. It helps them handle pressure and cope up with all types of difficulties that may cross their paths. Strong and confident children will always be able to make the right decisions for themselves. They would also be more willing to take up responsibilities and thus, become more successful in their lives. They also do not easily fall prey to mental illnesses like depression.

In my opinion, education is the backbone of every nation in the world. A well-educated person always proves to be an important asset to the country. Therefore, schools should focus on developing the personality of the children. This is because encouraging the children to become good human beings will, in turn, make them responsible and good citizens of the country. Thus, both of these aspects are intertwined.

Sample 18:

Schools are often known as a second home to children. This is because a huge portion of their childhood is spent in schools. Thus, the kind of education imparted by the schools is very important for the children. Many people are of the view that the main purpose of schools should be to make the children good citizens of the nation. However, in my opinion, this should not be the sole purpose of education in schools.

Schools have a moral responsibility of teaching the children to become good and responsible citizens of the nation. They must teach values like honesty, empathy and integrity to the children. These values, if nurtured, will help the children grow into responsible citizens who would try to work for the benefit of the society in general. For example, many children would join the National School Scouts and help in providing aid to the regions that have been affected by natural calamities like floods and earthquakes. Proper education will also help in the reduction in the rate of crimes and ultimately, result in the creation of a safer society. The schools must focus on making the children more economically independent by making the latter more competent and skilled. For example, in Bangladesh, the employment rate is nearly 30% higher for students who have been trained in vocational courses.

In addition to making children economically productive, the schools should also focus on the personality development of children. Individuality helps people to stand out in the crowd. It helps to boost their confidence levels and make them strong and independent personalities. For example, according to a survey published by CNN in 2014, educated people tend to be more successful and self-confident. It allows them to distinguish between right and wrong and thus, make correct and sensible decisions for themselves. It is important to develop the personality of children as it allows them to successfully handle pressure and tackle all sorts of difficulties in their lives. Personality development tends to make the children happier and consequently, become less prone to mental illnesses, for example, depression.

In conclusion, it can be said that the schools should always focus on the all-round development of the child. It should try to raise them to be good individuals as well as responsible citizens of the country.

Sample 19:

I definitely agree with the statement that the primary aim of schools is to turn the pupils into good citizens and workers rather than benefit them as individuals. I feel that schools have to fulfil both things, but the primary aim is towards the welfare of society, and the benefit to the individual automatically ensues.

Schooling can do a lot for shaping children. Firstly, school is a system with so many possibilities for a child to grow into what he or she actually is. For example, teachers are able to mould children by identifying their hidden strengths, and the same strength may later make the child what he actually is in this world for.

Secondly, since children spend a sizeable amount of their time with teachers and a community of boys and girls from different faiths, statuses and family values – there is a great possibility for a child to undergo a transformation into a good human being. Teachers are a great force to influence children.

Of course, learning academic subjects is the main aim for what students go to school. Definitely, the job market requires professional knowledge the most. But it is also true that if students become good citizens and workers, they are themselves equally benefited.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that raising children into real human beings involves several factors. Among them, the prominent one is good schooling. Schools’ main function is to make students good and responsible workers, and the personal benefit to students also takes place simultaneously.

Sample 20:

Some people are of the opinion that the primary role of schools is to create good citizens, instead of merely working towards individual betterment. During the course of this essay, this statement would be subjected to objective discussion before drawing a rational conclusion.

Obviously, there are a plethora of reasons to support the given perspective; nevertheless, the value of a well-functioning society seems to be the most widely accepted. As contemporary society moves into a phase of rapid developments in medicine, technology, welfare and so on, the luxury of conformity requires people to sacrifice their individualism for common prosperity. To be specific, individuals are expected to function harmoniously to both stimulate the economy and preserve the peaceful existence amongst communities. As much as these prerequisites require education, school is where this education can initiate. In many educational institutions, teachers have the power to both openly and subconsciously influence students’ socially responsible actions and provide them with a solid foundation for future employment.

On the other hand, this perspective should not be considered an ideal one. As a result of following their own ostensibly selfish goals, students who are taught to share, work effectively in teams, and enhance their talents can benefit society. In addition, it’s possible that occasionally the emphasis on society may come at the expense of people’s mental health. For instance, pupils who are instructed to keep their personal opinions to themselves in class, as is typical in many authoritarian countries, could harbour anger and feel unable to properly express themselves in a democratic setting. According to cognitive science, the ability to express oneself without worrying about negative consequences or repercussions is essential for well-rounded development.

In conclusion, while there is a case to be made for societal stability, schools should work to develop strong, motivated students. Naturally, these objectives do not conflict with one another, and it is important to highlight the overlap.

Sample 21:

Schools and other educational institutes are regarded as the most lighthouses of a country as they play a fantastic task by teaching students and helping construct a perfect nation. However, it is a never-ending debate regarding the primary goal of schools.

Firstly, the most crucial aim of education is to develop an educated state where morality, honesty, and ethics are the taxpayers’ vital qualities. They would keep aside their private dream and work collectively for the improvement of the nation. Since a college is a place where instruction is planted and cared for, its principal objective must be to concentrate on nurturing morality and great human traits among the pupils. What good does it bring to society when a gifted and seasoned physician treats patients just for the money he gets? Why should we not now have more professionals whose chief aim is to assist others? If we would like to have more individuals who would help others rather than turn into lucrative machines, we should concentrate on our education system, mainly teaching our kids.

Secondly, states spend a good deal of cash maintaining the colleges and keeping the education system running. A significant part of the spending comes from the taxation average taxpayers pay. From this regard, if colleges aim to embrace an education system where teachers’ sole goal is to teach kids how to become benefitted, the entire schooling system will lose its principal intent. We must be cautious when teaching children. We instruct them in their early phase would turn into their permanent attributes, and when the schools do not teach them to become perfect citizens, it could be a significant concern in the future.

Lastly, personal advantages, memorising some courses and receiving good grades should not be the principal reasons kids attend colleges, as well as the true private benefits, do not lie in the sum of money a person earns; instead, it is characterized by the joy and morality we profit in our own life.

In conclusion, making perfect citizens and committed employees ought to be the genuine objective of our universities. The greater good of the society, the bright and rewarding future of a country, and the individual achievements of people are connected with how we instruct our kids in schools, and that is exactly why our education ought to be focused on quality and morality.

 

Sample 1:

Technological advancements in robotics have sparked a debate regarding their significance in shaping the future of humanity. While some advocate for the pivotal role of robots in our development, others caution against their potential dangers, declaring negative societal impacts. This essay will discuss both perspectives and assert that they are indeed a danger to humanity and have negative effects on society.

Advocates of robotic integration argue that these machines represent a crucial asset in our evolutionary trajectory. Robots offer unparalleled precision, efficiency, and endurance in executing tasks, thereby augmenting human capabilities. For instance, in industries, automation through robots enhances productivity, reducing human error and streamlining processes. Furthermore, in healthcare, robotic surgical systems exhibit remarkable precision, benefiting patients with minimally invasive procedures.

Conversely, sceptics express concerns about the potential perils that arise from reliance on robots. One primary apprehension is the displacement of human labour due to automation, leading to job losses and economic disparity. Moreover, the autonomy and decision-making capabilities of robots raise ethical concerns, especially in fields such as artificial intelligence (AI), where a lack of control might result in unintended consequences, potentially harming society.

Personally, I align with the view that robots pose substantial risks and detrimental effects on society. The rapid integration of robots across various sectors may lead to widespread job displacement, exacerbating socioeconomic inequality. Moreover, the unchecked autonomy of advanced AI systems might pose unforeseen threats to humanity's safety and ethical norms.

In conclusion, while proponents view robots as pivotal in human progress, the potential dangers they pose, such as job displacement and ethical quandaries, warrant a cautious approach. Therefore, it is expected that scientists and technology companies take cautionary approaches while developing and using robots.

Sample 2:

The rise of robots ignites a fiery debate – are they our saviours, paving the path to a brighter future, or harbingers of doom, casting a shadow of technological dystopia? While concerns about their potential dangers hold merit, embracing their transformative potential with careful stewardship offers humanity a far more likely, and far more desirable, outcome, I believe.

Those who fear robots point to the unsettling spectre of automation-fueled unemployment and the erosion of human control. Visions of jobless masses and sentient machines turning on their creators fuel anxieties about a robot-dominated future. The increasing automation of factories and the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence undoubtedly pose challenges, potentially displacing certain workforces.

Conversely, another group of people point out that in industries like healthcare, robots can assist in delicate surgeries, tirelessly monitor patients, and even offer companionship to the lonely. Imagine a world where robots, equipped with artificial empathy, become invaluable caregivers for the elderly, freeing up human healthcare workers for more complex tasks. Additionally, in hazardous environments, from deep-sea exploration to bomb disposal, robots can take on the riskiest jobs, safeguarding human lives. History has shown that technological advancements often create new job opportunities that we cannot even imagine today. Just as the Industrial Revolution birthed new professions, the robotics revolution can usher in an era of innovation and demand for skills in areas like programming, robotics engineering, and ethical oversight.

I believe that the fear of robots stems from a misplaced apprehension towards the unknown. It is not the robots themselves that pose a threat, but our own failure to manage their development and deployment responsibly. By prioritizing ethical considerations, ensuring equitable access to the benefits of automation, and investing in reskilling programs, we can ensure that robots become partners in progress, not harbingers of doom. 

In conclusion, while the rise of robots presents legitimate concerns, their potential to improve our lives is far greater. By embracing them with responsible stewardship, we can weave a future where humans and machines collaborate, not compete, paving the way for a brighter, more prosperous, and ultimately, more humane tomorrow.

Sample 3:

Our society has been undergoing numerous technological changes, among which is the rapid growth of the robotics industry. While some people express their concerns about the possible adverse impacts, I would argue that robots can offer vast benefits for humans’ future development.

On the one hand, the worry about the rise of robotics is justifiable, considering that jobs become casualties. As robots are versatile machines that often complete tasks with precision and ask for no perks such as insurance and paid time off, they appear more competitive than human beings in certain occupations. The assembly line in the automobile industry has already shown that the shift from human labor to machines can yield higher productivity. Another doubt people hold lies in the safety issue because there are situations where robots fail to handle an emergency flexibly but operate as they are programmed, causing damages that otherwise humans could avoid. These incidents inevitably lower people’s trust in automation.

On the other hand, I would side with others who have confidence in robots. Implementing robots benefits employees since they free workers from repetitive and tedious tasks and allow them more time for creative work and innovation. As for dangerous tasks such as defusing bombs or space exploration, robots save lives and go beyond human beings’ capacities, accomplishing what people cannot do. Additionally, in a daily life context, this game-changing technology has been adopted in the healthcare industry, assisting surgery or helping disabled and senior people to lead better lives. Its application in entertainment, households, and personal life is thriving, leading to further improvements in individuals’ lives.

In conclusion, as with any revolutionary technology, robots would give rise to drastic changes, including negative ones like job displacement. But new industries and businesses that people never imagined would also ensue. Therefore, I am convinced that robots will play a crucial role in humans’ future progression.

Sample 4:

Rapid advances in robotics have fueled controversy about the roles of these computerised machines in future society. It is my belief that robots are both beneficial and detrimental in equal measure.

The merits of robotics are increasingly evident in various spheres of life. First, robots boost productivity and improve safety in the workplace. They are ideal for repetitive tasks that require preciseness and consistency, such as packaging and labelling. They can also serve as a substitute for humans in hazardous jobs, like manual welding, which exposes workers to harmful noises and toxic gases. Second, programmed equipment is used for intricate surgeries in the medical field since it enables less invasive and painful procedures and speeds recovery. Additionally, search and rescue operations in emergencies are usually facilitated by robots. Immediate access to victims in places humans cannot reach helps save more lives.

Despite the aforementioned positives, the robotic industry is causing mounting concerns. The automation of workplaces leading to job losses has created anxiety and insecurity among both intellectual and manual workers, and some individuals may even experience a negative impact on their sense of self-worth when replaced by machines. Moreover, replacing conventional employees with wirelessly controlled robots may pose an increased risk of data breaches. Hackers, for instance, can collect patients’ personal information and medical records without the knowledge of hospitals. Another drawback is that computerised machines often have limited functionalities, so it is extremely costly for enterprises to respond quickly to changing business conditions and new technological developments.

To conclude, it is undeniable that robots contribute to better work efficiency and safety standards and offer valuable assistance to medical practitioners. However, job losses in automated workplaces worry many social groups, while cyberspace insecurity and business costs related to robotics bring other problems.

Sample 5:

It is a noticeable fact that robots are used in almost all domains of business and for personal work. Some people think robotics are very beneficial for humans and will improve the quality of products and life, but some people opine that this will lead to job loss and machines’ dominance over humans. Here in this essay, both views will be discussed along with my opinion.

There are many advantages of robots. First, robots can work more efficiently and quickly, which is beneficial to human beings in the future. People can complete their target on time with full accuracy, which improves their work position. Another benefit is that robots will perform an essential role in nuclear power and construction industries because it is very dangerous for a human to work in these companies, so robots will provide safety to all employees by performing a perilous (full of danger or risk.) task. Last but not least, it is very natural that human irritates very quickly in repetitive jobs, but it is more productive for robots to perform the same task again which not only increase the productivity but decrease the employee workload because he/ she gives command only once and machine work continuously until the job is finished.

Despite these advantages, the use of robotics will lead to many disadvantages, such as job losses. Many reports have proved that over-usage/ introduction of robots in every sector has reduced the number of human workers. For example, many restaurants are replacing their workers with single machines, allowing customers to simply enter their orders and receive food at their tables. This process will be beneficial for customers and the company but dangerous for employees. Another drawback is a robot is a machine that can be controlled by people, but if bad people manage it, then it will be proved very dangerous for society. For example, a country’s security systems are controlled by robots so, it could be hazardous if someone hacks the security system because in that way terrible people do whatever they want, and authorities can not handle it.

In conclusion, even though the use of robots may have adverse consequences/results on the development of civilization, I believe the benefits far more than its drawbacks. Governments and corporations should use robots but only in those areas in which they are beneficial to humans.

Sample 6:

Stepping into the 21st century when humans are entitled to a wide range of state-of-the art approaches to improve their standard of living, robots have entered into every corner of human life. Although it is commonly believed by some that the appearance of robots plays a significant role in the development of the human race, others fear that these robots take their tolls on society. As far as I am concerned, robots are really a mixed blessing.

A great deal of benefits from robotic system has been proven in many ways, among which the key one is that compared with human, robots which are incorporated into both domestic and industrial life are able to perform tasks in 24 hours consecutively in factories without resting. The preponderance of evidence has shown that a host of robots can help people to fulfill household duties such as cleaning their houses or washing dishes and so forth, which are by far widely enjoyed in the contemporary society. Another striking feature of the technological revolution is that robots are able to work in extreme condition where human are helpless. The case is true that replacing human labor with robots tends to prevent workers from being exposed to dangerous, stressful or unhealthy environments, constituting the likelihood of reducing labor-related risks.

Although the justification has been given for the significance of these cutting-edge machines, we cannot turn a blind eye to the diversity of repercussions of incorporating robots into the society. Provided that robots are to carry out so many labor tasks and replace labor force, factories need not so many labors that a huge number of workers are being put in the brink of being jobless. Another shortcoming when living in robot-dominated era should be taken into account is that robots have artificial intelligence, and they cannot replace human intelligence in solving various problems. The case is true that few robots have been assigned in carrying out the operation in some hospitals and it seems dangerous for patients, as robots cannot be responsible for their actions.

In the light of these facts, one can subscribe to the notion that robots are neither a boon nor a bane to human life. While its endeavor to bring more convenience to the human race for a better standard of living has been recognized, robots have also put the creativity and employment of humans at risk.

Sample 7:

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular in many parts of the world. However, it is a debatable matter whether robots are a boon or a bane for society. Many people say that robots are beneficial for the progress of the human race while others refute it. This essay shall discuss the statement from both aspects.

Undoubtedly, robots are beneficial for human’s future development in enormous different ways. Robots can reduce human efforts to zero levels when it comes to physically challenging tasks. For instance, ore-mining, construction work, undertakings of dangerous assignments at nuclear power plants, and so on. In such places, robots are the saviors. Moreover, the human brain tends to quickly fester in repetitive work which ultimately affects performance. So, here again, robotic machines can perform the same task for a prolonged time and that too with the same level of pace and efficiency since they begin. Apart from this, robotics is making human life more convenient, comfortable, and easier. For example, Zenbo, a robot, imparts a humanly experience of companionship by sharing emotions with the individuals and performs house-related chores as well.

On the other hand, risks associated with robot technology cannot be ignored. Since it is undeniable that any minute discrepancy in machinery can pose a threat to human lives. Besides this, overdependence on robots makes humans lethargic and shirker which further leads to serious health ailments like obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and depression. Most importantly, unemployment is the major threat to the labor class in the upcoming years due to the adoption of robotic technology at a larger scale.

In my opinion, despite certain disadvantages, there is no exaggeration in saying that in the next few decades, robots will make the world go round. They would be able to do everything and anything possible with par excellence.

Sample 8:

The role of robots in shaping the future has ignited a debate, with some extolling their importance while others decry their negative impact. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and offer my opinion.

Proponents argue that robots are crucial for human advancement. They cite the remarkable precision and efficiency robots bring to industries like manufacturing, boosting productivity and cost-effectiveness. Robots excel in dangerous or inaccessible environments, reducing risks to human life during activities such as deep-sea exploration and search and rescue missions. Moreover, assistive robotås enhance the quality of life for individuals with disabilities, fostering independence.

Conversely, skeptics highlight concerns like job displacement. As robots become more sophisticated, they encroach on human job domains, potentially leading to unemployment and economic disparities. There are also fears that reliance on robots could erode human skills and knowledge. Ethical dilemmas arise from the development of autonomous weapons and surveillance robots, with implications for warfare and privacy rights.

In my view, a balanced approach is essential. Robots undeniably offer benefits, but their integration must be carefully regulated. Job displacement should be managed through reskilling and upskilling programs. To prevent the erosion of human skills, education systems should adapt to the changing landscape. Ethical considerations require stringent regulations to ensure the responsible use of robots.

In conclusion, robots have the potential to shape human society positively but also pose challenges. Careful management and regulation are necessary to harness their benefits while mitigating their adverse effects. Balancing the advantages of robots with potential drawbacks is vital for a harmonious future.

Sample 9:

In the opinion of many, robots are beneficial for the future society, while others believe that robots will make future societies worse off. There are valid points on both sides, and they have merit.

On the one hand, the people who favor robots are thinking on the line of the Industrial Revolution in the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe. In other words, these people believe that robots will make our lives easier, just like the industrial revolution did a few hundred years back for the human race. For example, robots can take up risky and dirty jobs, which is unsafe and undignified for any human. Furthermore, the initial capital may be heavy, but a robot uses minimal maintenance, unlike a human. Thus, robots will make human lives in the future more efficient and more manageable.

On the other hand, as robots enter the labor market, they can threaten the livelihood of many unskilled and semi-skilled workers in the developing world. This is undoubtedly a problem for skilled workers since our research and current technological trends don't show artificial intelligence surpassing human cognitive ability. For example, robots are appropriate for doing tasks like breaking things, welding, painting cars, cleaning, and other tasks requiring much less inexpensive training than humans. Therefore, a rise in unemployment is inevitable in some sectors of the economy in the near future if robots are employed without safety nets.

In conclusion, it can be ascertained that robots can change the way human beings live in the coming years. However, this significant intervention in society has both positive and negative repercussions. The positive includes an efficient life, whereas the negative includes job loss in the Third World. I believe that robots can redefine and make our lives more efficient, but the government should develop adequate public policy. Unskilled and semi-skilled workers should be provided with training to take up alternative forms of employment when robots enter the job market.

Sample 10:

Two shades of opinion exist on the issue of robots in society. The former adheres to the somewhat progressive way of integrating more robots into our daily life for the better, while the latter is much more conservative and sees robots as a threat. While I see some valid points on both sides of the coin, I believe that much of the latter opinion has been shaped by popular culture and the media.

Robots have revolutionized the manufacturing industry, especially those based on the assembly line manufacturing process. It is evident that in a world that moves fast and is always on the move, consumer goods and other industrial products need to be manufactured quickly and efficiently to keep pace with the demand and supply curve. For example, even in China with a vast labor force, the majority of the heavy and dangerous work is done by robots. Thus, robots not only bring speed to the production process they also keep human hands from rough and unsafe work.

On the other hand, some people are obsessed with assessing the adverse and disastrous effects robots can have on human life. Primarily such notions develop after seeing major commercial Hollywood movies which capitalize on fear by showing robots as evil characters. Films like these show robots destroying cities and killing people and destroying the earth. Therefore, these people are very much afraid when others talk about robots' benefits to the world.

In conclusion, some humans acknowledge the beneficial effect of robots on our lives while others fear them. I believe the acknowledging set of humans think from a logical point of view, whereas the people who fear robots are only influenced by commercial films. That is, they don't put much effort into understanding robots. Therefore, in my opinion, robots should be welcomed.

Sample 11:

World opinion is divided between two extremes. One side back investing in robots while the other side is against robots with all their might. While I understand that there are specific reasons in favor of robots, opinion against robots stems from a lack of understanding of the issue.

The first side thinks of robots as what they are. In other words, robots are there to make our life easy, just like every other machine. For example, with the advent of personal computers in the 90s and the introduction of the internet, we live in a much smaller world where humanity is connected. In a similar way, robots introduced in restaurants and hotels have made our lives easy. Thus, jobs that are aligned with serving people are done more efficiently than humans.

However, some people confuse robots with artificial intelligence. That is, robots are machines that follow orders or do repetitive tasks, but artificial intelligence is a system or program that can mimic how a human thinks. It is also important to mention that artificial intelligence doesn't even need a robotic body to operate. For example, virtual assistants on our laptops and phones like Siri, Google Assistant, and Amazon Alexa try to mimic how humans think and speak. On the other hand, most robots in factories don't even look like humans. Thus, the fear of robots is unfounded.

In conclusion, one side thinks of robots as machines listening to orders given by humans, while the other judges them as free-thinking individuals like artificial intelligence. Most robots are making our lives easier and the life of humanity much safer, like working in extreme temperatures or working under a lot of water or air pressure. If any humans even come to the vicinity of those areas, they may lose their life. Equating such important machines with self-thinking systems is a gross error that society must be sensitized about.

Sample 12:

Robots are artificially created intelligent electro-mechanical devices. They are designed by human beings to assist in performing some activities that are considered tiresome, boring, and, at times, risky. Some individuals opine that these robots would be pivotal in the future development of mankind. However, others are sceptical and fear that these robots will have negative effects on society. In the following paragraphs, I intend to discuss both views.

To begin with, robots speed up the production process and are very good at repetitive tasks. For example, it is a well-known fact that the leading products made in developed countries like Japan are made with the help of intelligent machines or robots. What is more, robots can be operated 24 hours per day, which can also raise the productivity of the companies. Secondly, in the field of medicine, robots have been used to do complicated surgeries. For instance, in robotic eye surgery, there are no tremors in the hands of robots; therefore, the scope of serious errors is much reduced with the help of robots.

Robots can also work in extreme conditions where humans are helpless. For example, robots helped a great deal in rescue operations due to the tsunami and were used in nuclear environments to close Fukushima’s reactors. Robots will change the way we live in many ways by lifting more and more tasks off our shoulders. Robots can help us to do household duties like cleaning our house or washing dishes. This way, we have more time to do useful work or spend time with family or friends. Robot toys can play with children and help them in their development. Home security can be done by a robot, which can keep its attention up constantly and look out for unfamiliar situations like a fire or burglar.

However, there are some who think that robots may negatively affect people’s lives and also be extremely dangerous. There could be an increase in unemployment in the future. It is expected that robots could replace many people in their working place. One evidence for this is that a few robots have already started teaching children at schools, while others have been working as servants for several families. And it is clear that some employers will choose cheap robots instead of humans, as they would work round the clock and also not take sick leave or coffee breaks.

In the near future, robots will join our lives in various ways and play a growing role of importance. Robots will make our lives easier and increase our general living comfort. We have created robots, and we should know where to draw the line in their use so that we get the best out of them minus their disadvantages.

Sample 13:

Robots, the marvels of modern technology, have been hailed as path-breaking innovations, and are perceived as critical for future forays by some, while others are cynical of the impact these machines will have on humans.  

Undoubtedly, robots have ushered in an era of convenience; and with the advent of more intelligent machines in the near future, that are almost in the fruition stage, their interaction is bound to rise. This will surely render an ease of life. Smart machines capable of comprehending voice commands and functioning accordingly, would render not only household chores but also tedious office work effortless; thus, affording ever becoming busier humans much more time for themselves.

Besides this, what now many avoid doing considering the nature of task to be extremely hazardous, robots – equipped with smart intelligence – would make those jobs look safer: their interventions would make it possible for humans to stay at a safe distance and let these devices carry out research and experiments in remote and dangerous places, like deep sea and space exploration, assessing volcanoes and their nature, etc. Moreover, robotics, the way it has been developing, it seems, will make errors things of the past, especially in case of high precision equipment manufacturing and surgeries.

However, there are concerned and cynical views regarding the proliferation of robotics in every walk of life. Many feel that the furtherance of these modern machines would cast an evil shadow over humanity, rendering humans incompetent and making them completely dependent on machines; thus exposing them to unwarranted situations in case of an even of some calamity.

In a nutshell, I feel, even though robots present some risks, it would be inappropriate a response to fear these machines; it is necessary to embrace new technology and not treat them with a disdain.

Sample 14:

Robots are likely to become as ubiquitous as the smartphone computers we all carry in our future society. While some people argue that robots might have negative impacts on the future society, personally I believe that the benefits of the robot are likely to outweigh the negative aspects of it.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why it could be argued that robots might have adverse effects on society in the future. Firstly, some people believe that robots will have a negative impact on the human workforce. People will be replaced by machines, and this will increase the unemployment rate. As a result, many other problems may emerge such as poverty and increased crimes. Secondly, people will become more dependent on robots in their daily life, and this may harmfully affect their skills, such as cooking and driving. So, people become less active, and this may result in some health problems like obesity.

On the other hand, I would agree with those who argue that robots will play important positive roles in future society. The first role is that robots could operate in locations that humans cannot reach such as exploration of outer space. They can act as extended eyes for humans enabling them to look beyond their visual boundaries. Moreover, robots will be used inside human bodies for monitoring their health and undertake surgery. The second role that will be played by robots is the helping of elderly and retired people with their daily life activities like cooking and cleaning. Finally, robots could do normal jobs quickly unlike human beings. Robots do not complain or get distracted or tired. They readily work twenty-four hours and require minimal maintenance.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for in and against the role of robots in our future would, but I believe that the robots will add many benefits to the future society.

Sample 15:

Increasing automation has become a controversial topic in recent years. In this essay, I will compare the advantage that robots can perform tasks that are dangerous or difficult with the disadvantage that robots could take over jobs. I will conclude that, despite the drawbacks, this type of development is positive.

One of the main advantages of robots is that they are able to perform tasks that would be dangerous or difficult for a person. For example, robots are already used for bomb disposal, which keeps people out of harm’s way. Similarly, robots are capable of performing delicate and precise tasks in manufacturing and medical tasks settings with a high degree of accuracy. If we allow people to continue to do these jobs, it will lead to lives being lost and inferior products being made.

However, one of the main issues with this is that robots are taking over other jobs that are currently done by humans. In the past, we have seen auto manufacturing turn from a source of jobs to something that is mostly automated. If we see this happen in other industries, it could lead to widespread unemployment and economic insecurity. Although this would be good for factory owners, this type of unemployment has wider negative societal impacts.

In conclusion, while robots have the potential to greatly improve our lives by performing risky and difficult tasks, they also have the potential to take people’s jobs. Ultimately, I believe that this type of technological progress can lead to the creation of new jobs.

Sample 16:

The artificial intelligence is witnessing game-changing development. While some argue that it may pose a threat to human beings and stall social progress, I entertain the view that it will make a huge difference to our future development.

Of all the potential losses, safety issues are the immediate concern. To illustrate, as the working Tenvironment is extremely complex when robots are in use, designers may be unable to take all factors into consideration or precisely predict every possible accident. As a result, machines driven by the encoded programs are less likely to react accurately when emergencies pop up, thus incurring heavy casualties. For instance, there have been several reports about the malfunction of the Al technology installed in transport or manufacturing industry. However, with repeated tests and regular overhaul, those risks can be reduced. The automation technology is believed to eventually reach the high level of accuracy, precision, and sophistication.

On the other hand, the machine learning technology matters a great deal to the future development of mankind. To commence, such technology can uproot the problem brought by the ageing population. Owing to the longevity of pensioners and lower birth rate, an increasing number of countries, especially developed ones, are plagued by inadequate labor force, and such insufficiency is projected to be intensifying in the future. In this case, robots can act as eligible workers and well perform sundry tasks in workplace even with less faults. Besides, people will lead a more convenient life, with intelligent machines to offer 24-hour services, which will reduce and costs of employing more staff to work in turn and meanwhile motivate people to engage themselves in more advanced fields.

In a nutshell, artificial intelligence, negative social impacts though it may bring, will play an - indispensable role in future development.

Sample 17:

Once found in science fiction, robots are being used in a growing array of ways in society nowadays. However, many people see robots as a crucial tool for mankind’s future progress while others express their grave concern that robots are disastrous and have adverse impacts on society. This essay will expound on both perspectives, but in my opinion, robots will be proved to be dangerous for society and the humankind.

To commence with, robots will reap considerable benefits in the near future. First and foremost, it will augment industrial productivity. In simple words, robots can be programmed to operate at a steady optimal speed without pause, and thus producing more products within a shorter time compared to human workers. In addition to this, robotic machines will significantly improve medical care. In the immediate future, for example, robotic surgery will provide pinpoint accuracy during, which in turn, will reduce recovery time for patients. Most importantly, agricultural robots, in the coming days, will handle almost every task like planting, harvesting or spraying from weeds to pests more efficiently than human workers, and thereby yielding more crops.

On the other hand, many experts begin to sternly warn of the potential dangers of robots. First of all, individuals will face real challenges to retain full control of their lives. Human life will be more digitalized and be essentially ceded to code driven. The effect will be intense as automated processes become more intricate and prevalent. Second, there might be a torrent of data abuse. Put simply, most sophisticated robots are and will be in the hands of governments and corporations, thus striving for power and profit respectively. Last but not least, people’s increasing dependence on machine-driven ambience will erode their capacities to ponder, initiate action independent of automated processes, and communicate effectively with each other. Thus, robots will reduce individuals’ social, cognitive, and survival competencies.

In conclusion, robots will bring many adverse effects on human society in the sense that individuals will become more dependent on human-like robotic machines in complex digital systems. It is expected that we will control those machines and never become so dependant on them that they start controlling us.

Sample 1:

It is believed that oral communication is more effective than written communication. In my opinion, deciding which one is more powerful than the other depends on certain circumstances.

When it comes to situations that require body language and facial expressions, spoken words are better than written ones. Dating is an excellent example of this. It is more important to set up a face-to-face conversation with the person we have feelings for than to sit at home and send text messages. Emotion icons, photos or videos can never replace a real smile or the expression of different feelings during a dinner date. Another thing is that meeting and talking directly with each other helps us to have a better understanding of the person we are communicating with. We can easily guess the true feelings of the person we are talking face to face with through his or her facial expressions and gestures, but we cannot do that just by reading some written text.

However, I think that in terms of law and business, written communication is much more important than spoken words. In court, for example, our words might count for nothing if we do not have valid evidence, such as written documents, to support our arguments. Speaking of business, it would be much quicker, more time-saving and more convenient for a company to send emails regarding promotions and sales to a group of targeted customers than to meet and talk with every one of them.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that spoken words are more effective in situations when we need to use our gestures and show emotions, while written communication is preferable in law and business.

Sample 2:

When it comes to imparting and exchanging information, some people believe that speaking is more powerful than writing. Personally, I think that both methods can be effective forms of communication, but it depends on the specific circumstance as to which is the most appropriate at the time.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the other hand, writing can also be an effective tool in everyday communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are effective tools, while speech may sometimes be ignored or interpreted in different ways, written forms are usually stated very clearly. Employees can therefore reread documents repeatedly to avoid miscommunication. Additionally, written documents are usually required in legal procedures. This is the reason why many important documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and e-mails are usually kept in written form.

In conclusion, both spoken and written modes of communication have their own purposes, benefits and drawbacks, and people have to carefully consider which mode to apply in each specific situation.

Sample 3:

Communication plays an important part in the development of individuals. The thought that oral conversation is more successful than composed language is debatable. Some individuals guarantee that talking helps convey emotions and sentiments. Others think written language is more useful in transferring data. I am in agreement with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than the written form.

When used properly, speaking can be an extremely effective and efficient way of communicating. People who use oral communication can make emotional connections with their listeners. People can effectively pass on many different feelings by using their voices, and this is why they are able to inspire others and influence them simply through a compelling speech, a song, or a poem. Your words can be interpreted differently when you use a certain tone, for instance, an emphatic voice while trying to convey a vehement sentence can make an extensive impact on the listener. In addition, face-to-face interactions also make it easier to avoid the misconceptions.

Furthermore, listening helps people to remember and comprehend more. Spoken communication helps us understand the pronunciations and accents of the speaker, something that is impossible through written communication. It may be better to use verbal communication when information is urgently needed, such as an emergency at stake or when the receiver has no access to writing instruments, such as young children.

Nevertheless, some people might argue that correspondence is better for someone who can’t convince others through speech, but it cannot always be a solution. Speaking skills provide a sense of accomplishment and personal development that writing cannot.

In conclusion, I am convinced that verbal interactions are more influential than written ones as the sense of understanding is quite efficient when body language and facial expressions are used.

Sample 4:

Whether written or oral is a more powerful form of communication has long been a subject of debate. Personally, I argue that neither of the forms could be said to be superior since there are nuances that can only be conveyed through either the spoken or written medium.

On the one hand, speeches have always been used as the primary method of addressing large masses of people, for they are more effective at conveying feelings of passion and excitement. Speakers, by lowering and increasing the volume of their voice, can alter the energy of an audience that writers cannot do as easily through the written word. It is no mistake that every political leader conveys their ideas and inspires their people through speeches: successful politicians of the past, such as Obama or Tony Blair, were also great orators who can excite a crowd?

On the other hand, the separation and impartiality of the written form allow the medium to paint more colorful and detailed worlds. The impersonal nature of writing also allows the written form to convey things that would be rejected through the spoken word, and engage in darker, more mature content that provokes the mind. This is why many people still read books since they help to paint a more vivid picture of the subject they are trying to convey. Due to the added layer of engagement required in reading as opposed to listening, readers can explore worlds in greater depth than listeners can.

Overall, I argue that speeches and the written word have different uses for they have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and it cannot be said that one is more powerful than the other.

Sample 5:

Many people opine that oral communication is more powerful than written communication. In this essay, I will explain why I disagree with this idea.

This idea often stems from the fact that spoken communication is the oldest form of communication. Also, it is used as the most common medium for the exchange of information as speakers can give utterance synchronously to their listeners who then are able to respond in real time. In contrast, written form, despite the longer response time, as a more reliable means of communication in the legal, academic and business world should be mentioned. Written documents and correspondences such as agreements, letters, emails, or books are kept as a source of reference while spoken conversations, even recorded, are not legalised and invalid in most cases.

Second, oral communication can facilitate face-to-face communication when speakers can not only use oral and verbal form but also non-verbal tools to convey the emotional message. For example, many political figures are articulate thanks to a combination of inspired words and their ability to read their audiences’ true feelings from facial expressions to adjust their delivery and meaning of speech. Therefore, it is believed that spoken communication is more important than the written one. Of course, writers might not have such luxury, but they seem to pay more attention, and actually have time to do so, to convey their ideas through written language with precise grammar and vocabulary, which are often simplified in spoken language. There are examples of books or pieces of text that are full of enthusiasm and represent effectively complex notions or emotional expressions.

In conclusion, it is difficult to decide whether spoken or written communication is more important than the other.  Both these mediums can play a key role in different circumstances and communication purposes.

Sample 6:

People communicate with each other via different platforms every day. Various types of communication can take place, but the two chief forms are spoken and written communication. Some believe that the former can have stronger impacts on humans compared to the latter. I totally disagree with this opinion as both are equally powerful and useful when used appropriately.

Speaking and listening to people can be effective in many situations. First, many people prefer to talk to others when it comes to personal issues as it is more intimate and is easy to express sympathy and empathy. Second, it is much faster to communicate with somebody by calling as opposed to writing or texting, especially when it comes to an emergency such as calling for an ambulance or seeking help from the police. Finally, an oral discussion is a much more convenient way to exchange ideas, clarify meaning and misunderstanding, or resolve conflicts as people can ask questions and seek responses immediately. Given that, spoken messages can easily be forgotten if not noted down, and speakers often have to repeat the message many times over to

reach the listeners unless the speech is recorded.

On the other hand, reading and writing are also widely used for their benefits. Writing books or journals is a great way to pass on your knowledge to a large audience as many readers can access the books at the same time. Furthermore, written documents can last a lifetime and can be translated into different languages, so they can reach a mass audience generation after generation. Although reading culture is deteriorating among the young, more people than ever before are engaging in online written communication such as writing a Twit or posting a status on their Facebook account.

In conclusion, both forms of communication are powerful in their own ways, and humans need to apply each one appropriately to become effective communicators.

Sample 7:

In modern times communication plays a vital role in our daily life. Communication is the key to interacting and building a reputation with people around. Oral communication is seen to be more successful than writing. Talking helps a person express emotion which does not happen in written texts. Some people also think that written language is more useful for communicating. I definitely go with the fact that spoken communication is much more effective than written ones.

Speaking is considered the most effective way to communicate with others. If the words are used properly, talking can display all kinds of emotions like anger, happiness, frustration, etc. The individuals using spoken communication can connect with the ones they are communicating with. They can rely on listeners. Voices convey actual emotions, and they are able to influence people through their speech. A speech can be compelling, and motivating, for the listeners. For instance, the listeners can understand the tone of the speaker’s mood. He or she can understand from the voice whether the said words were assertive or declarative. Moreover, face-to-face communication also makes communication easier. The chances of miscommunication diminish.

Additionally, listening can help people to memorize and understand more. Moreover, spoken communication helps to understand the accent and pronunciation of the speaker. Sometimes a few words are difficult to understand or pronounce. It is better to have verbal communication rather than writing. Also, during the time of emergency, a call to the receiver can help rather than writing and waiting for a reply.

Nevertheless, some people do prefer written communication as they can’t be convinced through their speech. It is difficult for them to reply then and there. But speaking skills can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building.

Lastly, to conclude, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication.

Sample 8:

In today's fast-paced society, spoken communication is often preferred over written communication. I agree with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than written communication. In this essay, I will explain the advantages and disadvantages of spoken communication to justify my opinion. From my perspective, interaction through our own voices has more beneficial impacts on our daily lives. Firstly, direct communication with people helps to convey emotions in a way that written communication cannot. This is an indispensable and crucial factor in creating long-term interactions. To seize various opportunities and to know people better, verbal communication is the best way. For example, the other day I was standing in line for admission to college. I talked to a few of the students standing with me in the long line. The wait was long, so we got time to speak to each other. Hence, from my freshman year onwards, I already have friends and many known faces thanks to striking up face-to-face conversations with different students. With the passing days, we connected more and more. The reason spoken communication is preferred is that body language and facial expressions can be observed, which helps to understand whether the speaker is talking about something good or bad. On the other hand, written communication restricts us from understanding and sympathizing with emotional feelings. As written communication lacks tone, voice, mood, emotions, and more, this can create misunderstanding as well. Secondly, spoken interaction can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building. For instance, in debate, directly speaking our views in front of a large group of people and waiting for their refusal, helps in the practice of critical thinking and quick response. In contrast, writing our opinions down and sending them may be good for introverts but waiting for a response might create a mishap. Hence, this might create disputes, and this online conversation will end quickly. In conclusion, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication. It also allows for better emotional expression, personal development and opportunities for building relationships. Additionally, it allows for immediate feedback and helps to build critical thinking and quick response skills. Therefore, spoken communication is more beneficial in many aspects of our lives, from personal to professional.

Sample 9:

Some people are in favour of the power of speaking more than that of writing in communication. However, I believe that it all depends on the situations to decide which mode of meaning creation is more important than the other.

For some cases, oral speech conveys ideas and opinions most effectively. In programs like live political debates on television in elections, the sharpest weapon for would-be prime ministers or presidents is obviously their eloquent speeches. In such a live show, spontaneous answers to unexpected questions are usually decisive factors for the persuasive presentation of political stances which can earn them votes. Additionally, in closing sales, the power of convincing a lead to make purchasing decisions is largely dependent on the art of speaking of the salesperson, not on written texts in the product brochure. The power of speaking is also palpable in conflict resolution where typed ideas are not as detailed and well supported as oral reasoning and explanations. That is why people often have to talk their problems out instead of exchanging limited and even easily misunderstood texts.

However, for other purposes, written communication is better for task completion. Indeed, written texts are considered more formal than spoken ones, so in case of an invitation to an important event like a wedding, or a ceremony, letters of invitation are nearly the only means of communication accepted. Also, for working circumstances, the need to keep track of the correspondence among relevant parties is significant, and this inherently requires people to communicate by emails, faxes, or text messages instead of speaking face-to-face or via technological devices. Moreover, in special events like birthdays, or Christmas, a card with elaborated handwritten messages usually means much more than a ready-to-give wish on the tip of one's tongue.

In conclusion, both spoken and written communication are equally necessary for people to function in life, but it is a situational issue when one of them is more powerful than the other.

Sample 10:

It is argued that speaking is a more effective means of communication compared to written forms. However, I strongly disagree with this notion as both of them are capable of having a great influence on human society.

It is undeniable that verbal communication is potent as the emotions of the speaker can be conveyed simultaneously with the intended message. Listeners often experience a wide range of emotions, such as passion, excitement or even intimacy in the tone of the speaker, thus, rendering the main idea aiming at them more convincing and powerful. In contrast, reading about that same idea off a piece of paper may not be as effective because without proper manners of speaking, the audience may fail to comprehend the undertone of the message. For example, politicians often deliver speeches live rather than sending emails or letters because they have a higher chance of winning the general public with an eloquent manner, which can only be conveyed through speaking. As a result, their campaigns can gain more support from the appropriate use of spoken communication.

However, that does not mean written communication is ineffective. The power of such means lies in its reliability which is due to its unchangeability. When a piece of information is printed or written down, there is hardly anything that can be done to alter the meaning of the stored message. Therefore, the possibility of misinterpretation can be mitigated, protecting the authenticity of the information. The power of written words is often shown in contracts or legal documents; such materials are always subject to paperwork because they require a high level of legitimacy, which is better provided by written communication than the spoken one.

In conclusion, the two means of communication are equally powerful depending on the nature of the message. Each method has its own potential, so its use should be carefully considered to get a desired result.

Sample 11:

There is no doubt that there are many ways for two people to communicate, especially with the development of technology. It is frequently argued that written communication is not as effective as vocal communication. Personally, I share this opinion, and the supporting evidence for my viewpoint will be discussed in the lines that follow.

To begin with, the effectiveness of oral communication is the most important defense. It goes without saying that the likelihood of misinterpretation or misunderstanding is extremely low when people communicate face-to-face. Because in-person communication includes eye contact, mannerisms, body language, and other elements that are absent in printed language, people are able to elaborate on their points much more. This is possibly the reason why a sizable majority prefers verbal communication to convey their thoughts and feelings more effectively.

Additionally, verbal communication is the only practical way to send messages on time in the hectic world of today. Today, everyone has a cell phone, making it possible to make contact with anyone anywhere in the world. They can communicate verbally quickly, whereas individuals find reading and sending letters or emails to be much more time-consuming. According to a new Oxford University report, the use of email has decreased by 70% over the past five years due to the growing use of cellular telephones.

To sum up, I’d want to reiterate that verbal communication is unquestionably the most successful form of communication, given the low likelihood of miscommunication and its practicality in contemporary society when written communication sometimes looks laborious and unproductive.

Sample 12:

It is claimed that verbal types of communication are stronger than written ones. Personally, I completely agree with this idea because of some reasons which will be explained in this essay.

To begin with, spoken communication is a powerful way of influencing other people. Firstly, when one gives a speech verbally, they can use their powerful voice as well as gestures to make their talk more convincing. This helps them easily express their emotions and trigger empathy from listeners. For example, many motivational speakers have the ability to tell touching stories which could literally bring tears to people’s eyes. By contrast, if individuals read written messages, it could be difficult for them to visualize the writer’s ideas. Secondly, oral presentations can reach a large audience. For instance, it is possible to deliver a speech in front of thousands of participants in a public event, while it could be hard to publish sufficient documents to provide for the same amount of audience.

At the same time, written communication is less effective in terms of conveying messages. One reason for this is that in many underdeveloped areas around the world, a considerable number of citizens are illiterate. This means they cannot read books or newspapers, and oral speeches seem to be the only way to approach these people. Additionally, it takes a significant amount of time and effort to collect and publish the ideas of an author. Therefore, by the time the necessary information comes to the reader in the form of a book or a newspaper, it may have already become outdated.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that spoken ways of delivering messages are more influential, because they can heighten listeners’ feelings and reach a broader audience quickly. At the same time, in my view, written communication has a smaller impact, as it is time-consuming and also useless for illiterate individuals.

Sample 13:

Some people are of the opinion that spoken communication may have an edge over its written counterpart. From my perspective, both spoken and written forms are important in equal measure, and therefore I completely disagree with the statement.

Spoken language, on the one hand, facilitates our daily communication. Virtually all social activities that human beings engage in such as making purchases, exchanging information or chatting with friends entail people uttering words to one another, and it is not an overstatement to say lack of oral communication may render us unable to carry out any essential tasks in life.

Additionally, when combined with body language, facial expressions, and eye contact, oral communication exhibits strong emotional messages. Whilst political figures make persuasive, well-articulated speeches as an effective tool of persuasion and manipulation, women make full use of their sweet, melodious voices to talk their beloved ones into buying things they want to.

Written language, on the other hand, appears to be relegated and ignored. This is unfortunate because written communication has advantages that would make it a superior choice in some situations over oral communication. From a legal perspective, written language, in the form of legal documents, is instrumental in safeguarding the rights of the people.

Most contracts are carefully drawn up in written forms and require signatures, and therefore they are solid and hard to be breached. In contrast, so-called ‘agreements’ or ‘promises’ in oral forms, in most cases, are invalid.

Moreover, written language is a very efficient representation of complex notions, emotional expressions, and philosophies. Great minds store their ideas in books and novels, and those books have been instrumental in spreading their ideas to a much wider range of audiences. We can see written language as a way of indirectly conversing with not only one, but hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that both spoken and written communication are equally important in our society. Whereas spoken language enables us to do everyday tasks and effectively show our emotions, written language plays a pivotal role in legal matters and allows for great ideas to be spread to a lot of people.

Sample 14:

Regarding conveying and exchanging information, some individuals argue that speaking holds more power than writing. From my perspective, I believe that both approaches can serve as effective means of communication, yet the suitability depends on the particular context.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the contrary, writing can also serve as an effective tool in daily communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are potent instruments, whereas speech might sometimes be disregarded or construed differently, written forms are generally expressed very clearly. Hence, employees can review documents repeatedly to prevent miscommunication. Moreover, written documents are typically indispensable in legal proceedings. This elucidates why many crucial documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and emails are usually documented.

In summary, both verbal and written means of communication serve distinct purposes, advantages, and disadvantages, necessitating individuals to meticulously contemplate which approach to adopt in each specific circumstance.

Sample 15:

The fact that oral languages came into existence tens of thousands of years before written ones across virtually all civilizations makes many people think that spoken communication is more powerful than its written counterpart. This essay argues against this one-dimensional ideology and claims that both forms of communication are equally influential in its own right.

On the one hand, the power of spoken communication derives from its ability to convey information directly and more effectively during face-to-face interactions. Exposed to not only words but also visible emotions and body language, listeners can fully grasp the messages being conveyed and how strongly the speakers really believe in those messages. The revolutionary “I Have a Dream” speech by Dr. Martin Luther King perfectly illuminates this argument. While each word in this historic speech is undoubtedly moving and inspirational, it was the strong, relentless emotions that Dr. King displayed in his speech that rallied support from people all around the globe to his anti-segregation movement.

On the other hand, what constitute the strength of written communication are the official recognition and the social prestige that written documents command. Simply put, written communication is permanent and there are many ways to distinguish the writings of figures of authority, such as signatures or stamps, and hence, it carries more weight. The Constitution of the United States, for example, was written in the 18th century but is still upheld and respected up until this day because it was written by the revered founders of the country, Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. Documents written by famous people in positions of power, as a result, will be more widely accepted and withstand the test of time due to their association with personal reputations.

All things considered, it is imprudent to conclude that one form of communication is better than the other, as both forms have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it depends on the purpose of the users to determine which one is more powerful.

Sample 16:

In this day and age, some people hold the belief that oral communication outclasses written communication in all aspects. While it cannot be denied that spoken communication is important, I do believe that an effective means of communication depends on the situation.

On the one hand, spoken communication entails not only words but also intonation and body gestures, which enormously contribute to the impact that the speakers exert on others. For further elucidation, in certain circumstances, presenting is a more effective approach to convey messages given that a speaker can appeal to more people with a unique tone and attractive body language than a long monotonous essay. A prime example is that in most of the electoral campaigns, candidates often deliver speeches to seek advocates instead of writing letters because their devotion and dedication can be more easily illustrated through words and gestures.

On the other hand, writing is undeniably an effective communication method because of its formality and reliability. To elaborate, a piece of writing often uses formal or academic terms, and it is rarely changed after being printed or made public. Therefore, the readers feel that they are respected, and the possibility of the information being misinterpreted or distorted is minimized. For instance, the power of written communication is demonstrated in the case of a letter sent to a customer or a legal document, indicating the fact that in some situations, oral communication is not preferable.

In conclusion, I am convinced that both speaking and writing are effective methods of communication, and a specific circumstance is the key factor to deciding which outperforms the other.

Sample 17:

People have different views about which method is more useful to communicate between speaking and writing. Some people argue that face to face meeting is more effective to deliver information, while others say that texts are better for that. However, I believe that both these viewpoints are worth considering in depth since they have their own benefits and usage of each method is distinguished according to situations.

First of all, it is true that spoken communication is the most common method to deliver information. Many people tend to converse with others before they write it as a document because talking is convenient and commonplace in people’s lives. For instance, speaking plays an important role when people tell their personal or secret stories to others. In addition, speaking is a powerful method to convey information in an emergency circumstance because it is faster than other communication skills. Meanwhile, people can develop a faith and create a relationship by looking each other’s eyes or sharing a similar emotion during face-to-face meeting. 

On the other hand, writing can enable people to deliver messages in a logical and systematic way. This is because information can be transferred without any distortion and makes people to find a faulty easily. This is the reason why people write a document during contract negotiations. Furthermore, texts are suitable to deliver complex and long-winded stories which are hard to convey by speaking and it is proper to preserve messages for long time or inform to the public at once.

In conclusion, both methods used to communicate have their own characteristics. When people want to deliver messages promptly or with emotion, speaking is more preferable. However, people who need to give concrete information without distortion should select writing to communicate with others. Therefore, I believe that people need to choose the communication method depending on situations they encountered.

Sample 18:

Some people claim that verbal communication is more effective than written communication. In my opinion, this varies from person to person, and sometimes also depends on the context in which the question is to be referred to the other person. Thus, both forms of communication hold equal importance.

Spoken communication is often considered to be more versatile, as during a conversation, the listener can easily capture the emotions of the speaker. Eyes reflect the soul, and facial gestures can easily determine whether the speaker is fake or real. Prominent politicians and influencers around the world use this form of communication while conveying their thoughts. A passionate speech can arouse the emotions of the listeners. If we read history, we will read about brilliant orators who even made revolutions with the power of their fiery speeches. However, this form of communication does not always produce the desired result, as when misunderstandings arise in face-to-face communication, things may go out of control and people might end up deeply scared of an otherwise beautiful relationship. Conversational interactions are also not very suitable for conveying unpleasant messages.

On the other hand, the written form of communication is better for those who do not have the ability to persuade others orally. Some people can't deliver a perfect speech, but their words say a lot about them. The pen is mightier than the sword is not just a saying. Some writers shock the world when they present their ideas and opinions. However, written communication often reaches only a limited section of society.

In conclusion, like the fingers of the human hand, no two people are alike. Some may have excellent oratory skills, while others may excel at written communication. Therefore, it is difficult to say whether written communication is more powerful than verbal communication because it depends entirely on the circumstances and the written or spoken skills of the communicator.

Sample 19:

Nowadays, great emphasis is put on developing communication skills in order to succeed in the job place and in businesses. However, there is a debate going on which mean of communication is the most effective. I am in staunch support of the notion that conveying an argument through speaking is always far better than through writing, as the former involves gestures and expressions helpful to convey ideas more efficiently, and room for the misconception is little compared to that in writing.

To begin with, verbal communication involves hand movements and facial expressions, making it easier for recipients to understand information. That is to say, the audiences not only can listen to what is being said but also in what mood it is being said. For instance, recent research conducted by an American motivational firm revealed that around 70% of their employees follow verbal instructions more precisely than the written ones. The seriousness of instructions is sensed through expressions and body language; therefore, spoken communication is given more weightage than the textual one.

Moreover, there is a lesser chance of ambiguity in a face-to-face interaction than the written correspondence. This is because one has the liberty to ask any question to clear his misconception, rather than developing a wrong understanding. A survey carried out by Oxford University, for example, showed that about 80% of their teachers said that the response of students in verbal lectures is better than that in written lessons. The reason behind this is that the students perfect their concepts by asking questions from the tutors, which is not possible in the case of textual handouts where there are chances of developing wrong concepts and ideas leading to poorer grades.

To conclude, I am ardently in favor of the view that spoken interaction is more instrumental than the written one, as the chance of understanding the ideas are way more than in written communication because of body gestures, facial expressions, and minimal misconceptions.

Dịch câu hỏi:

Một số người tin rằng đọc truyện từ sách thì tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em. Bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý với ý kiến này ở mức độ nào?

Đáp án:

Sample 1 (Mẫu 1):

While it has been said that reading books for pleasure rather than watching TV is more beneficial for one’s imagination and acquiring language skills, I contend that the role of the former in boosting intelligence and language ability is equal to the latter.

On the one hand, books are instrumental in enhancing children’s imagination and development. A kid reading a fairy tale with illustrations will have to think, fantasize and use their creativeness to comprehend ideas and reasoning, which in turn sharpen their mental skills. Moreover, reading books helps to improve language skills. Spending time reading a book which is not written in our mother tongue leads to the development of a strong language base referring to its vocabulary or comprehending the meaning of a word in different contexts. Besides, reading out a book for children is also an effective way to help them improve their communication skill, which is greatly stimulated as the kids grab a spoken word and use it in daily conversations.

On the other hand, watching TV is considered an important activity as reading in order to cultivate one’s imaginativeness regarding its characteristics of programs. Firstly, when audiences watch a tourism channel for example, they are exposed to a wide range of knowledge by seizing images of worldwide landscapes or feel tastes of specialties in various geographical regions. The broadcasting of quiz shows serves as an efficient learning tool for both children and adults who prefer taking challenges which involve critical thinking. Secondly, the role of TV in boosting linguistic competence is pivotal. Recent English programs not only support audience to remember words easily by associating them with vivid images shown on the screen but catch their constant attention with entertaining aspects.

In conclusion, while the benefits of reading are undeniable, they cannot outweigh the role of TV in enhancing a person’s imaginativeness and language skills.

Dịch:

     Mặc dù người ta nói rằng đọc sách để giải trí thay vì xem TV có lợi hơn cho trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ, tôi cho rằng vai trò của việc đọc sách trong việc nâng cao trí thông minh và khả năng ngôn ngữ là ngang bằng với việc xem TV.

     Một mặt, sách đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc phát triển trí tưởng tượng và sự phát triển của trẻ em. Một đứa trẻ đọc một câu chuyện cổ tích có minh họa sẽ phải suy nghĩ, tưởng tượng và sử dụng sự sáng tạo của mình để hiểu các ý tưởng và lý luận, từ đó rèn luyện kỹ năng tư duy. Hơn nữa, đọc sách giúp cải thiện kỹ năng ngôn ngữ. Dành thời gian đọc một cuốn sách không phải tiếng mẹ đẻ giúp xây dựng nền tảng ngôn ngữ vững chắc, từ việc học từ vựng đến hiểu nghĩa của từ trong các ngữ cảnh khác nhau. Ngoài ra, đọc sách thành tiếng cho trẻ em cũng là một cách hiệu quả để giúp chúng cải thiện kỹ năng giao tiếp, vì trẻ sẽ nắm bắt được từ ngữ nói và sử dụng chúng trong các cuộc hội thoại hàng ngày.

     Mặt khác, xem TV được coi là một hoạt động quan trọng không kém việc đọc sách trong việc nuôi dưỡng trí tưởng tượng của con người nhờ vào đặc điểm của các chương trình truyền hình. Thứ nhất, khi khán giả xem một kênh du lịch, họ sẽ được tiếp cận với một kho tàng kiến thức phong phú qua hình ảnh các danh lam thắng cảnh trên thế giới hoặc trải nghiệm hương vị của các đặc sản từ nhiều vùng địa lý khác nhau. Các chương trình đố vui cũng là một công cụ học tập hiệu quả cho cả trẻ em và người lớn, những người thích thử thách tư duy phản biện. Thứ hai, vai trò của TV trong việc nâng cao năng lực ngôn ngữ là rất quan trọng. Các chương trình tiếng Anh hiện nay không chỉ giúp khán giả ghi nhớ từ vựng dễ dàng hơn bằng cách liên kết chúng với hình ảnh sống động trên màn hình mà còn thu hút sự chú ý của người xem nhờ yếu tố giải trí.

     Tóm lại, mặc dù lợi ích của việc đọc sách là không thể phủ nhận, nhưng chúng không thể vượt trội hơn vai trò của TV trong việc nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của một người.

Sample 2 (Mẫu 2):

     Many people believe that reading books is far more beneficial for children than watching television or playing computer games. Personally, I completely agree with this opinion and will analyze the issue in the following essay.

     To begin with, children can better improve their imagination through reading books as opposed to watching television or playing computer games. By reading stories, children have to use their imagination to visualize all the events described in the book. While reading, they will create images, thoughts and opinions in their mind, and therefore enhance their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case for watching television, as it already provides the viewers with vibrant colourful images and sounds. Consequently, it is reasonable to say that reading books helps to improve children’s imagination compared to watching television or playing computer games.

     Additionally, reading stories from a book also develops children’s verbal abilities more so than watching television or playing computer games. Children are exposed to a wide range of vocabulary and sentence structures when reading, and therefore reading books can provide great opportunities for children to advance their ability to describe things, which leads to better writing skills. Meanwhile, rather than text, sound and image are the two key elements of television and computer games, which does little to improve children’s vocabulary.

     In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching television or playing computer games as this activity helps to enhance both imagination and language ability.

Dịch:

     Nhiều người tin rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Cá nhân tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với quan điểm này và sẽ phân tích vấn đề trong bài luận dưới đây.

     Trước hết, trẻ em có thể cải thiện trí tưởng tượng tốt hơn thông qua việc đọc sách thay vì xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc truyện, trẻ phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hình dung tất cả các sự kiện được mô tả trong sách. Trong quá trình đọc, chúng sẽ tạo ra hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và ý kiến trong đầu, nhờ đó nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và sự sáng tạo. Trong khi đó, điều này khó có thể xảy ra khi xem TV, vì TV đã cung cấp sẵn cho người xem hình ảnh đầy màu sắc và âm thanh sống động. Do đó, có thể nói rằng đọc sách giúp cải thiện trí tưởng tượng của trẻ tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử.

     Ngoài ra, đọc truyện từ sách cũng giúp phát triển khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ tốt hơn so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Trẻ em tiếp xúc với một lượng lớn từ vựng và cấu trúc câu khi đọc, nhờ đó việc đọc sách mang lại cơ hội tuyệt vời để trẻ nâng cao khả năng miêu tả, điều này dẫn đến việc cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Trong khi đó, yếu tố chính của TV và trò chơi điện tử là âm thanh và hình ảnh chứ không phải văn bản, do đó, chúng không giúp ích nhiều cho việc mở rộng vốn từ vựng của trẻ.

     Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn hẳn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì hoạt động này giúp nâng cao cả trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ.

Sample 3 (Mẫu 3):

     Nowadays, due to the popularity of technology and its adverse impact on children, many people argue that reading storybooks is more beneficial to children than watching TV programs or playing video games. This essay supports this position for the following reasons.

     Firstly, reading books can help children improve their academic achievements. Children reading books regularly are likely to have competent literacy skills, which is important for their study because schools often require students to comprehend a great deal of knowledge from reading various subjects’ content. Hence, being competent in literacy skills can provide children with an added advantage when completing their assignments. Children with an advantage in literacy skills tend to have higher results in school exams, because they not only have wider knowledge but also better reading and writing skills.

     More importantly, reading stories as a way of entertainment is instrumental in cultivating children’s creativity. In this technological world, when children depend too much on TV and computers in various life aspects, engrossing in books is an undeniably wonderful stress reliever to keep children away from electronic devices. Besides, reading books encourages children to use their imagination to comprehend the plots and characters of these stories, which in turn sharpens their creativity. For instance, when immersing into Harry Potter for relaxation, children have to use their creativity to fantasize and understand the magical world with the existence of many fictional characters such as witches, dragons, or monsters.

     In conclusion, I once again affirm that engaging in stories from books can bring more benefits for children than spending time on TV and video games, because children can gain both educational benefits and great joy when enjoying book stories.

Dịch:

     Ngày nay, do sự phổ biến của công nghệ và những tác động tiêu cực của nó đối với trẻ em, nhiều người cho rằng đọc truyện có lợi hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem các chương trình truyền hình hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Bài luận này ủng hộ quan điểm đó vì những lý do sau đây.

     Thứ nhất, đọc sách có thể giúp trẻ cải thiện thành tích học tập của mình. Trẻ em đọc sách thường xuyên có xu hướng có kỹ năng đọc viết tốt, điều này rất quan trọng đối với việc học tập của chúng vì các trường học thường yêu cầu học sinh tiếp thu một lượng lớn kiến thức từ nhiều môn học khác nhau. Do đó, việc thành thạo kỹ năng đọc viết có thể mang lại lợi thế cho trẻ khi hoàn thành bài tập. Những trẻ có lợi thế về kỹ năng đọc viết có xu hướng đạt điểm cao hơn trong các kỳ thi ở trường, vì chúng không chỉ có kiến thức rộng hơn mà còn có kỹ năng đọc và viết tốt hơn.

     Quan trọng hơn, đọc truyện như một hình thức giải trí giúp nuôi dưỡng trí sáng tạo của trẻ. Trong thời đại công nghệ, khi trẻ em quá phụ thuộc vào TV và máy tính trong nhiều khía cạnh của cuộc sống, việc đắm chìm vào sách là một cách giải tỏa căng thẳng tuyệt vời giúp trẻ tránh xa các thiết bị điện tử. Hơn nữa, đọc sách khuyến khích trẻ sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hiểu cốt truyện và nhân vật trong các câu chuyện, từ đó giúp rèn luyện khả năng sáng tạo. Chẳng hạn, khi đắm chìm vào thế giới của Harry Potter, trẻ sẽ phải vận dụng trí sáng tạo để hình dung và hiểu về thế giới phép thuật với sự tồn tại của các nhân vật hư cấu như phù thủy, rồng hay quái vật.

     Tóm lại, tôi một lần nữa khẳng định rằng đọc truyện từ sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì trẻ có thể nhận được cả lợi ích giáo dục lẫn niềm vui khi đọc sách.

Sample 4 (Mẫu 4):

     Many people believe that reading books is more beneficial for children compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Personally, I completely agree with this opinion and will analyze my point of view in the essay below.

     To begin with, children can better improve their imagination through reading books in comparison with watching TV or playing games. By reading stories, children have to use their imagination to create a vision and visualize all events described by words in the book. While reading, they will create images, thoughts and opinions in their mind, thus enhancing their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case for watching TV, as TV already provides them with the full image and vibrant colours. Consequently, it is reasonable to say that reading books helps children produce more imaginative responses compared to watching TV.

     In addition, reading stories from a book also develops children’s verbal abilities compared to watching TV or playing computer games. Children will be exposed to a wide range of vocabulary as well as sentence structures when reading. Therefore, reading books can provide great opportunities for children to advance their vocabulary level, which can lead to their better writing skills. Meanwhile, when it comes to TV shows or computer games, sounds and images are two key elements rather than texts. That is to say, books are far better than TV or games at increasing children’s vocabulary.

     In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching TV or playing games for children since this activity does good to both their imagination and language ability.

Dịch:

     Nhiều người tin rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi trên máy tính. Cá nhân tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với quan điểm này và sẽ phân tích quan điểm của mình trong bài luận dưới đây.

     Trước hết, trẻ em có thể cải thiện trí tưởng tượng của mình tốt hơn thông qua việc đọc sách so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi. Khi đọc những câu chuyện, trẻ phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng để hình dung và mường tượng tất cả các sự kiện được mô tả bằng ngôn từ trong sách. Trong quá trình đọc, trẻ sẽ tạo ra hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và ý kiến trong tâm trí, từ đó nâng cao trí tưởng tượng và khả năng sáng tạo. Trong khi đó, điều này khó có thể xảy ra khi xem TV, vì TV đã cung cấp sẵn hình ảnh đầy đủ và màu sắc sống động. Do đó, có thể nói rằng đọc sách giúp trẻ tạo ra những phản ứng giàu trí tưởng tượng hơn so với xem TV.

     Ngoài ra, việc đọc những câu chuyện từ sách cũng giúp phát triển khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ tốt hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc, trẻ sẽ tiếp xúc với một loạt từ vựng phong phú cũng như các cấu trúc câu đa dạng. Vì vậy, đọc sách có thể mang đến cơ hội tuyệt vời để trẻ nâng cao vốn từ vựng của mình, từ đó cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Trong khi đó, khi nói đến các chương trình truyền hình hay trò chơi điện tử, âm thanh và hình ảnh là hai yếu tố chính thay vì văn bản. Điều đó có nghĩa là sách vượt trội hơn TV hay trò chơi trong việc mở rộng vốn từ vựng cho trẻ.

     Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn nhiều so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi đối với trẻ em, vì hoạt động này có lợi cho cả trí tưởng tượng và khả năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ.

Sample 5 (Mẫu 5):

     According to some, reading stories from books is superior to watching TV or playing video games for children. I disagree with this sentiment, however, since there is not much evidence for the idea that books are inherently more beneficial to children, and that they should be given both mediums in order to aid their developmental processes.

     On one hand, child psychologists now believe that there may be far more benefits to playing video games which could be beneficial to their long-term development. Games are famous for improving spatial awareness and logic amongst younger children and can also serve to teach morality on a far better level than many books, as they purposely place the player in ethical scenarios with long-term consequences. For example, games such as Undertale are revered for their capabilities in teaching hard-hitting moral philosophy in a hands-on, proactive approach that teaches the player the consequences of their actions.

     On the other hand, reading books is the only real way of improving literacy, which is essential for young children if they want to have a well-paying job in the future. Child literacy is often used as a measure to compare the educational performance of different countries, as a literate population can better absorb instructions needed to carry out their future professions. Therefore, improving a child’s ability to read in the home through stories can be an effective way to improve their chances of financial success in the future.

     Overall, I believe that while the traditional book is still hugely beneficial to children, TV, and video games have been shown to contribute to some aspects of their abilities as well. As such, I believe that both should be consumed by the younger generations in moderation.

Dịch:

     Theo một số người, đọc truyện từ sách có lợi hơn so với việc xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em. Tuy nhiên, tôi không đồng tình với quan điểm này vì không có nhiều bằng chứng cho thấy sách vốn dĩ có lợi hơn cho trẻ em, và rằng trẻ nên được tiếp cận với cả hai phương tiện này để hỗ trợ quá trình phát triển của mình.

     Một mặt, các nhà tâm lý học trẻ em hiện nay tin rằng chơi trò chơi điện tử có thể mang lại nhiều lợi ích lâu dài hơn. Trò chơi nổi tiếng với khả năng cải thiện nhận thức không gian và tư duy logic ở trẻ nhỏ, đồng thời có thể dạy về đạo đức hiệu quả hơn nhiều so với sách, bởi vì chúng cố ý đặt người chơi vào những tình huống đạo đức với hệ quả dài hạn. Ví dụ, trò chơi như Undertale được đánh giá cao nhờ khả năng truyền tải triết lý đạo đức sâu sắc theo cách tiếp cận chủ động, giúp người chơi hiểu rõ hậu quả từ hành động của mình.

     Mặt khác, đọc sách là cách duy nhất để cải thiện khả năng đọc viết, điều này rất quan trọng đối với trẻ nhỏ nếu chúng muốn có một công việc lương cao trong tương lai. Trình độ biết chữ của trẻ em thường được sử dụng để so sánh hiệu suất giáo dục giữa các quốc gia, vì một dân số có trình độ học vấn cao có thể tiếp thu tốt hơn những hướng dẫn cần thiết để thực hiện nghề nghiệp của họ sau này. Do đó, việc cải thiện khả năng đọc của trẻ tại nhà thông qua các câu chuyện có thể là một cách hiệu quả để nâng cao cơ hội thành công tài chính sau này.

     Tóm lại, tôi tin rằng mặc dù sách truyền thống vẫn mang lại nhiều lợi ích lớn cho trẻ em, nhưng TV và trò chơi điện tử cũng đã được chứng minh là đóng góp vào một số khía cạnh phát triển của chúng. Vì vậy, tôi cho rằng cả hai phương tiện này đều nên được trẻ em tiếp cận một cách có kiểm soát.

Sample 6 (Mẫu 6):

     Numerous individuals argue that reading books offers more advantages to children than watching TV or playing computer games. From my perspective, I wholeheartedly support this notion and will elaborate on my standpoint in the ensuing essay.

     Firstly, children can enhance their imagination more effectively through reading books compared to watching TV or playing games. When reading stories, children are required to utilize their imagination to construct mental images and visualize the events described in the book. Through reading, they generate mental images, thoughts, and viewpoints, thereby boosting their imaginative and creative abilities. In contrast, this is less likely to occur while watching TV, as television already presents them with complete images and vivid colors. Consequently, it is fair to argue that reading books stimulates children to produce more imaginative responses than watching TV.

     Moreover, reading stories from books also enhances children’s language skills in contrast to watching TV or playing computer games. When children read, they encounter a wide array of vocabulary and sentence structures. Consequently, reading books offers significant opportunities for children to enhance their vocabulary, which, in turn, contributes to improved writing skills. Conversely, TV shows or computer games primarily rely on sounds and visuals rather than text. Therefore, books surpass TV or games in enriching children’s vocabulary.

     In summary, I am firmly convinced that the benefits of reading books outweigh those of watching TV or playing games for children, as reading contributes positively to both their imaginative faculties and language proficiency.

Dịch:

     Nhiều người cho rằng đọc sách mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn cho trẻ em so với xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử. Theo quan điểm của tôi, tôi hoàn toàn đồng ý với nhận định này và sẽ trình bày quan điểm của mình trong bài viết sau đây.

     Thứ nhất, trẻ em có thể phát triển trí tưởng tượng hiệu quả hơn thông qua việc đọc sách so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi. Khi đọc truyện, trẻ cần phải sử dụng trí tưởng tượng của mình để xây dựng hình ảnh và hình dung các sự kiện được mô tả trong sách. Thông qua việc đọc, trẻ tạo ra những hình ảnh, suy nghĩ và quan điểm trong tâm trí mình, qua đó nâng cao khả năng sáng tạo và tưởng tượng. Ngược lại, điều này ít có khả năng xảy ra khi xem TV, vì truyền hình đã cung cấp sẵn hình ảnh hoàn chỉnh và màu sắc sống động. Do đó, có thể lập luận rằng đọc sách kích thích trẻ tạo ra những phản ứng sáng tạo hơn so với việc xem TV.

     Hơn nữa, đọc truyện cũng giúp nâng cao kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của trẻ hơn so với xem TV hoặc chơi trò chơi điện tử. Khi đọc sách, trẻ tiếp xúc với một loạt từ vựng và cấu trúc câu phong phú. Do đó, việc đọc sách mang lại cơ hội quan trọng để trẻ mở rộng vốn từ vựng của mình, từ đó cải thiện kỹ năng viết. Ngược lại, các chương trình truyền hình hoặc trò chơi điện tử chủ yếu dựa vào âm thanh và hình ảnh thay vì văn bản. Vì vậy, sách vượt trội hơn TV hay trò chơi trong việc giúp trẻ mở rộng vốn từ.

     Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng lợi ích của việc đọc sách vượt trội hơn so với xem TV hay chơi trò chơi điện tử đối với trẻ em, vì việc đọc sách có tác động tích cực đến cả khả năng tưởng tượng và trình độ ngôn ngữ của trẻ.

Sample 7 (Mẫu 7):

     Reading stories in books is a basic way for children to obtain knowledge and open their minds. Although watching TV and playing computer games are also popular educational methods among children, I believe that reading books is better and offers more advantages than watching TV and playing computer games.

     Learning by reading is more effective compared to TV and games because it is an active activity. Like any other skill, reading takes practice. To fully understand the content, children have to give all their attention to the text. Also, more than just understanding a certain topic, children tend to develop imagination, as they imagine the characters from the description they read, which helps them to learn more efficiently and deeply in the future.

     Furthermore, reading stories also helps children master language development, as by reading stories, children learn pronunciation and vocabulary. It also increases a child’s attention span and develops the ability to concentrate. It develops children’s ability to express themselves more confidently, easily, and clearly in spoken and written terms. It develops and fosters a child’s natural curiosity.

     On the other hand, the knowledge disseminated by vivid pictures on screen is easier for children to imbibe, but too many moving objects and colorful images can distract children, especially some young kids, from other important tasks. Playing computer games also can be very addictive, as a result of which children fail to do their homework. Additionally, spending too much time in front of a computer screen or watching TV can lead to health problems such as short-sightedness. Therefore, reading is better for both efficiency and health purposes.

     In conclusion, it can be reiterated that reading stories in books is better than watching TV and playing on computers, as it is a more effective way to learn and is better for health.

Dịch:

     Đọc truyện trong sách là một cách cơ bản để trẻ em tiếp thu kiến thức và mở rộng tư duy. Mặc dù xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử cũng là những phương pháp giáo dục phổ biến đối với trẻ em, nhưng tôi tin rằng đọc sách vẫn tốt hơn và mang lại nhiều lợi ích hơn so với xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử.

     Học tập qua việc đọc hiệu quả hơn so với TV và trò chơi vì đây là một hoạt động chủ động. Giống như bất kỳ kỹ năng nào khác, đọc cần được rèn luyện. Để hiểu được nội dung, trẻ phải tập trung hoàn toàn vào văn bản. Hơn nữa, không chỉ đơn thuần là hiểu một chủ đề nào đó, trẻ còn có xu hướng phát triển trí tưởng tượng, vì chúng hình dung các nhân vật dựa trên mô tả mà chúng đọc được, điều này giúp chúng học hiệu quả hơn và sâu sắc hơn trong tương lai.

     Hơn nữa, đọc truyện cũng giúp trẻ làm chủ khả năng phát triển ngôn ngữ, vì khi đọc truyện, trẻ học cách phát âm và mở rộng vốn từ vựng. Đọc sách cũng giúp tăng khả năng tập trung và phát triển khả năng chú ý của trẻ. Nó giúp trẻ diễn đạt bản thân một cách tự tin, dễ dàng và rõ ràng hơn trong cả lời nói lẫn văn viết, đồng thời nuôi dưỡng trí tò mò tự nhiên của trẻ.

     Mặt khác, kiến thức được truyền tải qua những hình ảnh sống động trên màn hình sẽ dễ dàng thấm nhuần hơn đối với trẻ. Tuy nhiên, quá nhiều hình ảnh chuyển động và màu sắc có thể khiến trẻ, đặc biệt là một số trẻ nhỏ, mất tập trung vào những nhiệm vụ quan trọng khác. Việc chơi trò chơi điện tử cũng có thể gây nghiện, khiến trẻ xao nhãng việc học tập. Ngoài ra, dành quá nhiều thời gian trước màn hình máy tính hoặc TV có thể dẫn đến các vấn đề sức khỏe như cận thị. Do đó, đọc sách vẫn là lựa chọn tốt hơn về cả hiệu quả học tập lẫn sức khỏe.

     Tóm lại, có thể khẳng định rằng đọc truyện trong sách tốt hơn so với xem TV và chơi trò chơi điện tử, vì đây là một phương pháp học tập hiệu quả hơn và có lợi cho sức khỏe hơn.

Sample 8 (Mẫu 8):

     Modernization has brought about abundant conveniences in all aspects of life, with no exception regarding novel entertainments for the youth. While little objections exist against television programs and digital games being adolescents’ contemporary pastimes, conservatives still strongly advocate towards the priority of traditional quality time enjoyments, one of which is book explorations. From a personal perspective, I perceive that both points of view display compelling arguments, and therefore should be equally examined.

     Factually speaking, the comprehension of printed texts has proven its superiority against digital counterparts in regard to the benefits towards children’s neural developments. Much large-scale research publicly confirms television and computers’ detrimental impacts on humans’ neural activities, resulting in dementia, depression and focus deterioration. Reading books, on the other hand, affect brains in ways that an exercise equivalently does to physical well-being. It is, moreover, an undisputed view that reading books plays a crucial role in the success of all outstanding individuals in the modern world, from Elon Musk to Barack Obama.

     Yet, early exposure to technologies would also be of significant advantage to youngsters dwelling in this rapidly evolving time. While access to books certainly helps towards critical thinking, children’s early acquaintance with digital platforms’ unique cultures and insights would enable them to have better success in this increasingly ever-changing world. For instance, potential networks with fellow digital natives and knowledge of new, on-demand skills are among many positive consequences from gaming quests, which critical thinking may not offer as directly. As said, having technological literacy as a part of life equals less risk of falling behind in a digitally embedded reality.

     In conclusion, while opinions divide on whether a conventional approach to children’s entertainment would outweigh that of modern means, I believe both perspectives have plentiful merits to bring about for children’s developments.

Dịch:

     Sự hiện đại hóa đã mang lại vô số tiện ích trong mọi lĩnh vực của cuộc sống, bao gồm cả những hình thức giải trí mới cho giới trẻ. Mặc dù có rất ít sự phản đối đối với các chương trình truyền hình và trò chơi điện tử khi chúng trở thành những thú vui phổ biến của thanh thiếu niên thời nay, nhưng những người theo chủ nghĩa truyền thống vẫn mạnh mẽ ủng hộ việc ưu tiên những hình thức giải trí chất lượng truyền thống, một trong số đó là việc đọc sách. Theo quan điểm cá nhân, tôi nhận thấy rằng cả hai quan điểm đều có những lập luận cạnh tranh và do đó, cần được xem xét một cách công bằng.

     Trên thực tế, khả năng tiếp thu văn bản in đã chứng tỏ sự vượt trội so với các phương tiện kỹ thuật số về lợi ích đối với sự phát triển não bộ của trẻ. Nhiều nghiên cứu quy mô lớn đã công khai xác nhận tác động tiêu cực của truyền hình và máy tính đối với hoạt động thần kinh của con người, gây ra chứng mất trí nhớ, trầm cảm và suy giảm khả năng tập trung. Ngược lại, đọc sách ảnh hưởng đến não bộ theo cách tương tự như việc tập thể dục đối với sức khỏe thể chất. Hơn nữa, không ai có thể phủ nhận rằng đọc sách đóng vai trò quan trọng đối với thành công của những cá nhân xuất sắc trên thế giới hiện đại, từ Elon Musk đến Barack Obama.

     Tuy nhiên, việc tiếp xúc sớm với công nghệ cũng có thể mang lại những lợi ích đáng kể cho giới trẻ trong thời đại phát triển nhanh chóng này. Trong khi đọc sách chắc chắn giúp phát triển tư duy phản biện, thì việc trẻ làm quen sớm với văn hóa và hiểu biết độc đáo của các nền tảng kỹ thuật số sẽ giúp chúng thành công hơn trong một thế giới ngày càng thay đổi. Ví dụ, các kết nối tiềm năng với những người cùng thế hệ kỹ thuật số khác và kiến thức về các kỹ năng mới theo nhu cầu là một trong nhiều hậu quả tích cực của các trò chơi điện tử, điều mà tư duy phản biện không thể mang lại trực tiếp.Như đã nói, có kiến thức về công nghệ như một phần của cuộc sống đồng nghĩa với việc giảm nguy cơ bị tụt hậu trong một thực tế ngày càng gắn liền với kỹ thuật số.

     Tóm lại, trong khi vẫn còn nhữngý kiến trái chiều về việc liệu một cách tiếp cận truyền thống đối với giải trí của trẻ em có vượt trội hơn so với phương tiện hiện đại hay không, tôi tin rằng cả hai quan điểm đều có những lợi ích to lớn đối với sự phát triển của trẻ.

Sample 1:

Fewer people are currently engaging with news, as they believe news is no longer relevant to their day-to-day life. In my opinion, this is the wrong way to think, for watching the news is beneficial to a country’s social and democratic life.

Firstly, uninformed citizens who do not watch the news can often make bad political decisions. A well-informed populace that watches what is happening in the world, on the other hand, can help formulate policies that benefit society, for they are able to appreciate the intricate nuances that comes with any political decision. Switzerland’s ability to implement policies based on direct democracy, for example, has been reliant upon a populace that keeps up with current events. This model has worked well in the past and provides testament to the benefits of a large population being politically informed.

Secondly, reading the news also allows people to become more sociable, for it allows more things for people to talk and debate about. More specifically, by knowing more about what is happening in the world, individuals can talk to their friends on specific news items and their impacts. The prevalence of news in our daily conversations means that they are yet to be obsolete and will only be more important over time as the world expands and there are more stories to be explored. This is one of the reasons why national news media such as the BBC in the UK is such a cherished institution, for it helps to stimulate conversation and lively debates.

In summary, I argue that news stories should remain an important part of people’s lives, for they help instigate more lively discussions, forming a stronger basis for a vibrant society.

Sample 2:

In recent days, it is believed that reading newspapers and watching news on television is unnecessary due to these platforms' irrelevance to daily life. From my perspective, even though reading news is useless to a certain extent, this type of information still plays a vital role in people's lives.

On the one hand, it is indisputable that news portrayed on newsletters and TV programs has no connection to the ordinary's everyday life. In the first place, news coverage is full of politics-related headlines since broadcasts are mainly under the state control. That political news is unappealing for the majority of audiences who would rather watch recreational programs such as sports or music. Another explanation is that newspaper columnists and TV correspondents tend to produce sensational breaking news that captures the attention of readers and viewers. For example, scandals displayed on the cover page are mainly associated with celebrities and the virtual world.

On the other hand, tidings provide numerous kinds of useful information for our daily life. First and foremost, it enables readers to get updates on global events and social matters. For instance, the outbreak of the COVID 19 pandemic devastates the entire world but individuals are able to minimize damages thanks to news. Particularly, tidings allow followers to approach useful preventive measures against this virus and stay away from infected zones. In addition, young viewers are inclined to get the latest trends via online newspapers and TV channels. To illustrate, marketers are able to jump on the bandwagon to change strategies to approach new potential customers, especially younger generations who usually keep updated to new emergent trends. Once these people catch up with the trend, they can significantly boost their revenue.

In conclusion, I am convinced that acquiring information from news is beneficial despite several points proving its uselessness.

Sample 3:

Many people believe that it is a waste of time to read the news which they think is irrelevant to what is happening to our own life. I totally disagree.

On the one hand, when people think that news is unrelated to their life, they tend to think about international and entertaining news. For them, most reports on international emergencies and events that they read about are pointless as they are happening outside of their local community. Also, news coverage of celebrities on TV or the newspaper is purely entertaining and is meaningless to those who show no interest in entertainment. Thus, reading the news seems to be purposeless.

However, they seem to be much biased, as any piece of news can be remarkably helpful in our lives. For example, the news about celebrities could be valuable for the fans resorting to the news media to stay informed about who and what they are interested in. The second example that could be compelling to prove the importance of reading news is the information about the outbreak of coronavirus in Italy. If we-know-who had not ignored this state of emergency declared officially via the mass media and blindly visited the affected area and returned home without an honest health declaration as instructed on the news, they might not have been quarantined and been a factor to spread the disease. Otherwise, those concerned and informed could take corresponding actions to stay safe right away and keep their community safe.

In conclusion, it seems to be not a good idea to think that there is no interrelation between the news and our lives. Therefore, I do not agree that reading news is a time-wasting activity and I think that people should read the news to be up-to-date.

Sample 4:

Some argue that news is irrelevant to people's daily lives, making reading newspapers or watching television news programs a waste of time. However, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.

Firstly, reputable newspapers and news channels cover current affairs that significantly impact people's lives. The media serves as an effective way to disseminate information, even to the most remote places, fostering collective awareness and problem-solving. Reading prestigious sources of information, such as The Washington Post or the BBC, helps readers stay informed about global events. For instance, these outlets' in-depth reporting on issues like climate change or human rights violations can spark public discourse and inspire collective action, acting as catalysts for positive change.

Secondly, the coverage of negative stories in the media can raise awareness and prompt action towards solutions. Being informed enables individuals to avoid threats not only to their well-being but also to their community's safety. For example, extensive media coverage of cancer has led many people to adopt healthier lifestyles. Similarly, those who keep up with news about the Coronavirus pandemic can take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their families. Conversely, individuals who ignore such news may neglect essential medical procedures, thereby jeopardizing their health.

In conclusion, news is far from irrelevant; it plays a crucial role in informing and safeguarding the public, proving that consuming news is indeed a valuable and necessary activity.

Sample 5:

The relevance of news in people's lives today is in contention. Some people claim news programs are unnecessary because they offer little meaningful information. Personally, I believe news still plays a crucial role in informing people of current affairs.

One of the most significant functions of news stories is issuing warnings about upcoming or ongoing emergency problems. In case of natural disasters such as earthquakes or typhoons, broadcasters would give a brief description about the potential damage and advise locals to evacuate or take appropriate preventive measures. Without such coverage, many people would not know how to react when these situations strike, risking injuries or even deaths. Another case in point is disease outbreaks, the most recent of which being the coronavirus pandemic. If news programs had not covered extensively about the critical conditions of those already suffering from this disease, as well as promoting social distancing, it would have taken the world much longer to contain the pandemic, and countless more lives would have been lost.

News programs also serve as a window into the state of the global economy. Many countries rely on each other for energy or other resources, and should problems arise in one nation, others will also undergo shortages or shipment delays. That is why following news programs would help people understand, or perhaps prepare for the consequences of these events. Take the Russia-Ukraine conflict as an example. Because of hostility between these two nations, wheat production and exportation have been limited, thus agriculturalists around the world are trying to diversify their crops. Moreover, cargo aircrafts have had to circumvent, taking longer routes due to fear of entering Russian airspace. As a result, many regions are entering economic recession, and unemployment is on the rise.

In conclusion, although many people argue to the contrary, I am of the opinion that news is essential to our lives, giving us timely caution and also a glimpse into global events.

Sample 6:

It is claimed that news is not linked to one’s daily life, and therefore attention should not be paid to newspapers or news channels on television. Personally, I partly agree with this idea. In my opinion, while certain kinds of news are useless, there are also crucial pieces of news worth following.

On the one hand, several categories of news are simply a waste of time. The first one is updates about celebrities’ life stories, such as who they are dating or where they are spending their holidays. Although these kinds of information do not bring any value to a person, sadly, many young individuals spend more time following them than they should. Additionally, the audience tends to be attracted to shocking stories happening around the world, such as brutal murders or tragic accidents. These stories are irrelevant to people’s lives, and I believe they do not deserve to be given coverage in the press.

Nevertheless, some pieces of information could be necessary. Most importantly, people need to be aware of the serious issues currently taking place in their local area. For instance, residents need to be informed of new contagious diseases or rising cases of crime where they live, which helps them find ways to protect themselves and their families. Furthermore, a person should also follow news and updates related to their profession. For example, doctors have to keep track of the latest innovations in medicines or cures for health issues. Thus, these pieces of news are essential and should receive attention.

In conclusion, although news about famous people or shocking incidents in other parts of the globe can be considered time-wasting, other updates related to one’s career and problems in their local area are vital. In my view, people should be selective about which news to follow when they read newspapers or watch television.

Sample 7:

Some observers have argued that as news events do not often impact their everyday life, keeping up-to-date with this from newspapers and television is not an efficient use of time. Though this view might sound reasonable, I disagree, as being aware of current events through the news is beneficial and far from futile.

The stance of those who regard following the news as pointless is supported by several reasons. Initially, people can feel bothered by the lack of relevance that the news has to their immediate lives. Coverage of international conflicts or political debates, for instance, likely means little to a person who resides somewhere peaceful and politically stable. The time spent staying updated with such stately affairs, additionally, could be more productively allocated elsewhere. In fact, many people are so occupied with their work that they do not have time to consume news; these individuals, thus, could ignore the presence of current affairs in their lives altogether in order to have more time for their jobs and families. They might earn more money or become happier, as a result.

The importance of accessing news keeps it from being a waste of time, however. Firstly, doing so enables people to make informed decisions. By knowing how an area is suffering from an outbreak of disease or conflict, individuals are able to avoid traveling there or plan their trips around said location. More business-minded people, meanwhile, can take advantage of information learned from the news to make profitable choices as well. Watching news, furthermore, can help educate people on cultures and developments beyond their immediate environment. Being aware of these respects would promote understanding towards issues that, despite not impacting daily life directly, might propel individuals to become knowledgeable citizens, who can be of help to the community.

In conclusion, while some pundits dismiss the value of news consumption, I disagree with this view, as it is connected to life in various beneficial aspects. The advantages of being well-informed should not be understated, and remaining updated continues to play a consequential role in contributing to society.

Sample 8:

It is argued that there is no use in reading newspapers and watching news programs on television because news is irrelevant to people’s daily lives. From my perspective, I somewhat agree with this point of view because although I believe there is a connection between news and people’s lives, reading newspapers and watching news on television is pointless.

To begin with, I disagree that news does not have any sort of connection to everyday life. By definition, news is information or reports about recent events and are often categorized into different topics, each of which will attract a certain group of audience. For example, sport-minded people will be interested in reading sport news, while businessman will be more concerned with economic news. In other words, human’s interests in various fields will always be the glue that links news with people’s lives no matter what.

Although news is connected to people’s lives, I do believe reading newspapers or watching television news programs is a waste of time. We can read up to thousands of articles every day, yet very few of them help us make better decisions for our life, business or career. For example, weather forecasts and political news do not affect most of us. In addition, news produces news that captures viewers’ attention since the human brain reacts disproportionately to different types of information. Scandalous, shocking or people-based news, which often hold little value, stimulate us and consume a large amount of our time although we barely learn anything useful out of them.

In conclusion, I argue against the statement claiming that news has no connection to people’s lives because news reports what people are interested in. However, I firmly agree that reading news is a waste of time since it does not help people make better decisions and the media is biasing a large amount of non-helpful news.

Sample 9:

I strongly disagree with the notion that news has no connection to people's lives and that reading newspapers and watching television news programs is a waste of time. In fact, news plays a crucial role in keeping individuals informed, engaged, and empowered in the modern world.

First and foremost, news serves as a primary source of information that directly impacts people's daily lives. Whether it's updates on political decisions, economic trends, or public health issues, news provides the knowledge necessary for individuals to make informed choices. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, news outlets disseminated vital information about safety measures, vaccine distribution, and travel restrictions, enabling people to protect themselves and their communities.

Moreover, news fosters a sense of connectedness by highlighting shared experiences and global events. It allows individuals to understand the challenges faced by others and encourages empathy and solidarity. News stories about humanitarian crises, climate change, or social justice issues can inspire people to take action, donate to causes, or participate in volunteer work to make a positive impact.

Additionally, news plays a pivotal role in holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions. News acts as a powerful watchdog, ensuring accountability in society by revealing instances of corruption, misconduct, and injustice through investigative journalism. This vital function of the news media contributes to upholding the principles of transparency, ethics, and fairness in various sectors, including government, business, and civil society. Without news coverage, instances of abuse of power or corporate malfeasance could go unchecked, potentially causing harm to society.

In conclusion, news is an indispensable part of people's lives, providing information, fostering a sense of connectedness and holding power accountable. Far from being a waste of time, staying informed through news sources is essential for personal growth and societal progress.

Sample 10:

With the relentless surge of technology, there are those who believe that news has lost its relevance and connection to the daily realities of people's lives. Such individuals view the act of reading newspapers or tuning in to televised news programs as a futile endeavor. Although there is some merit to this perspective, I respectfully disagree and contend that news remains intrinsically tied to our lives and society, especially in the context of Vietnam.

One of the main arguments posited by proponents of this view is that a significant portion of the news consists of sensationalist or irrelevant information. Indeed, with media houses constantly competing for ratings and attention, there is a tendency to prioritize shock value over substantive content. For instance, in Vietnam, the extensive coverage of celebrity scandals or minor international events sometimes eclipses pressing domestic issues like agricultural challenges or infrastructural development. Furthermore, the inundation of advertisements, which can be seen as passive forms of news, often do not directly pertain to the lives of the ordinary Vietnamese citizen. This overemphasis on trivial matters, they argue, renders news consumption an inefficient use of time.

However, I believe that despite the occasional detours into the sensational, news remains an essential conduit for information. A well-informed populace is the cornerstone of a thriving democracy. In Vietnam, for example, the coverage of policies on education reforms, public transportation projects, or international trade agreements profoundly impact the lives of its citizens. Not only do these pieces of information shape public opinion, but they also guide critical decisions, from which school to send one's children to, to voting preferences. Moreover, with the current globalized world, understanding international news allows the Vietnamese to gauge potential economic or socio-political shifts that might directly affect the nation. For example, trade policies decided in distant capitals can have immediate repercussions on Vietnam's export-oriented economy.

In conclusion, while the world of news has undoubtedly seen shifts in content prioritization, it remains a pivotal part of our daily existence. It's imperative for citizens, particularly in a rapidly developing country like Vietnam, to remain well-informed and engaged with both local and global events. The occasional frivolities of the media should not overshadow its foundational role in informing and shaping society.

Sample 11:

It is assumed that since news bears no relation to individuals’ lives, reading newspapers and watching news broadcast on TV would be worthless. From a personal perspective, I totally disapprove of this viewpoint, and the following essay would further elaborate on my stance.

To begin with, there exists certain topical affairs that are closely correlated to people’s daily lives. It stands to reason that news pertaining to several aspects namely taxes, governmental regulations or the domestic labor market exerts direct impacts on the livelihood and lifestyle of people in a particular nation. Hence, being notified of such information can compel them to make timely and appropriate adjustments in accordance with ongoing changes in society, thereby having more active control over their day-to-day activities.

In addition, being updated with local and international news in today’s world has become increasingly essential, particularly for young generations. In the current era of hyper connectivity and global digitization, the pressure relating to responsibility heaped on the youth simultaneously becomes acute more than ever. On such ground, it is pivotal that they keep track of news relating to global events with a view to becoming global citizens and successfully integrating to worldwide advancements.

Many may argue that being informed of the latest happenings is a waste of time and effort, an opinion I do not endorse. Indisputably, as society develops, it is being confronted with more intractable problems revolving around education, climate change, pandemic or gender equality. Therefore, by keeping track of news via newspapers and TV broadcast, citizens worldwide can be cognizant of the severity and urgency of such problems, thus making concerted efforts to contribute to the resolution of global pressing issues.

In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that individuals should read newspapers and watch TV news programs for their both individual and social development; therefore, I would totally disagree with the idea of undermining the role of news. To some extent, obtaining news is vital for individuals to become a well-informed and ethical citizen.

Sample 12:

Many people consider news irrelevant to our daily lives, arguing that acquiring new information via newspapers or television is unnecessary and time-consuming. However, I believe that staying informed can still profoundly impact people's lives and is worth the effort.

Firstly, news continues to influence our lives in several ways, especially in enhancing our ability to make sensible decisions. In recent years, many digital newspapers have reported substandard quality of products from fast fashion brands such as H&M, Zara, and Shein. By acquiring this information, consumers can decide not to purchase these products, thus protecting their benefits. Additionally, such reports can pressure companies to improve their practices, showcasing how informed consumers can drive positive change. Therefore, it is reasonable to state that news can affect consumers' decisions and maintain its relevance.

Furthermore, the importance of staying updated with the news should not be underestimated. Due to the ever-changing nature of the world, information must be updated rapidly, often within days or even hours, to avoid dire consequences. For instance, news about weather events or natural disasters should be reported promptly so affected people can be alerted, evacuated, and casualties can be avoided. In such cases, staying connected with the news is not just beneficial but can be a matter of life and death.

In summary, although some view news as insignificant, its relevance cannot be overstated. News plays an essential role in making sound decisions and ensuring safety, such as choosing products wisely and receiving critical alerts during emergencies, helping us citizens effectively manage the complexities of contemporary life.

Sample 13:

It is believed by some that news has nothing to do with people's day-to-day lives and thus, it is pointless to spend time reading news or watching news channels. I believe that rather than a waste of time, there is actually a lot to gain by watching news on the TV and reading newspapers.

There are many reasons why people should keep themselves up to date with news events. Firstly, news is the main source of information about the government policies, which directly impact people's lives. In other words, people can be better prepared to deal with changes in laws if they read the news. For example, when traffic fines were increased, many people were caught unaware and had to pay huge fines. Thus, news makes people better informed citizens.

Secondly, news is a source of inspiration. When people hear or read about other's misfortunes and how they overcame them, they learn to be resilient. Not only that, when they learn about others’ adversity, they learn to appreciate what they have in life, and it encourages them to help and support others. Inspiration can also come in the form of innovative ideas about business. When people hear about others’ success stories, they are motivated to work hard and challenge their limits.

Thirdly, in this era of many truths, newspapers are the only thing that can help us differentiate the actual truth from the many rumours. By watching credible and objective news, people can learn how to distinguish fact from fiction, which in turn develops people's critical thinking abilities as well. Finally, it would be wrong to not consider the role of news in enhancing people's language and vocabulary skills.

To summarize, listening to the news or reading the paper daily is very important to be a part of the global village of today.

Sample 14:

It is claimed that spending time on reading or watching news is absolutely wasteful. Truth be told, I find it hard to agree because having access to daily news is a must to be well informed about what is going on in the world and to be equipped with specialized knowledge for conducting further scientific research.

For the general public, it is advisable to be aware of the current state of affairs. This is certainly directly related to individual life. A typical example of this close relationship is what people should do in case of war. More specifically, after reading news about the outbreak of a war near them, people may immediately prepare food for fear of the possibility of food shortages.

Those who work as scientists are always in need of updated information from news reports about various fields. These range from education to economics and healthcare. For instance, news about the current coronavirus has pushed researchers all over the world to compete 24/7 in inventing a vaccine against it. As a result, it can be argued that news is closely related to the outside world whether common people or experts in the scientific world are taken into consideration.

Summarizing, when it comes to the belief that reading news in newspapers or watching news on television programs is a total waste of time, I am not convinced at all. This is merely because all people need news no matter what job they are engaged in. Depending on their occupation, people might obtain different useful pieces of information when they are exposed to one and the same news item.

Sample 1:

Fewer people are currently engaging with news, as they believe news is no longer relevant to their day-to-day life. In my opinion, this is the wrong way to think, for watching the news is beneficial to a country’s social and democratic life.

Firstly, uninformed citizens who do not watch the news can often make bad political decisions. A well-informed populace that watches what is happening in the world, on the other hand, can help formulate policies that benefit society, for they are able to appreciate the intricate nuances that comes with any political decision. Switzerland’s ability to implement policies based on direct democracy, for example, has been reliant upon a populace that keeps up with current events. This model has worked well in the past and provides testament to the benefits of a large population being politically informed.

Secondly, reading the news also allows people to become more sociable, for it allows more things for people to talk and debate about. More specifically, by knowing more about what is happening in the world, individuals can talk to their friends on specific news items and their impacts. The prevalence of news in our daily conversations means that they are yet to be obsolete and will only be more important over time as the world expands and there are more stories to be explored. This is one of the reasons why national news media such as the BBC in the UK is such a cherished institution, for it helps to stimulate conversation and lively debates.

In summary, I argue that news stories should remain an important part of people’s lives, for they help instigate more lively discussions, forming a stronger basis for a vibrant society.

Sample 2:

In recent days, it is believed that reading newspapers and watching news on television is unnecessary due to these platforms' irrelevance to daily life. From my perspective, even though reading news is useless to a certain extent, this type of information still plays a vital role in people's lives.

On the one hand, it is indisputable that news portrayed on newsletters and TV programs has no connection to the ordinary's everyday life. In the first place, news coverage is full of politics-related headlines since broadcasts are mainly under the state control. That political news is unappealing for the majority of audiences who would rather watch recreational programs such as sports or music. Another explanation is that newspaper columnists and TV correspondents tend to produce sensational breaking news that captures the attention of readers and viewers. For example, scandals displayed on the cover page are mainly associated with celebrities and the virtual world.

On the other hand, tidings provide numerous kinds of useful information for our daily life. First and foremost, it enables readers to get updates on global events and social matters. For instance, the outbreak of the COVID 19 pandemic devastates the entire world but individuals are able to minimize damages thanks to news. Particularly, tidings allow followers to approach useful preventive measures against this virus and stay away from infected zones. In addition, young viewers are inclined to get the latest trends via online newspapers and TV channels. To illustrate, marketers are able to jump on the bandwagon to change strategies to approach new potential customers, especially younger generations who usually keep updated to new emergent trends. Once these people catch up with the trend, they can significantly boost their revenue.

In conclusion, I am convinced that acquiring information from news is beneficial despite several points proving its uselessness.

Sample 3:

Many people believe that it is a waste of time to read the news which they think is irrelevant to what is happening to our own life. I totally disagree.

On the one hand, when people think that news is unrelated to their life, they tend to think about international and entertaining news. For them, most reports on international emergencies and events that they read about are pointless as they are happening outside of their local community. Also, news coverage of celebrities on TV or the newspaper is purely entertaining and is meaningless to those who show no interest in entertainment. Thus, reading the news seems to be purposeless.

However, they seem to be much biased, as any piece of news can be remarkably helpful in our lives. For example, the news about celebrities could be valuable for the fans resorting to the news media to stay informed about who and what they are interested in. The second example that could be compelling to prove the importance of reading news is the information about the outbreak of coronavirus in Italy. If we-know-who had not ignored this state of emergency declared officially via the mass media and blindly visited the affected area and returned home without an honest health declaration as instructed on the news, they might not have been quarantined and been a factor to spread the disease. Otherwise, those concerned and informed could take corresponding actions to stay safe right away and keep their community safe.

In conclusion, it seems to be not a good idea to think that there is no interrelation between the news and our lives. Therefore, I do not agree that reading news is a time-wasting activity and I think that people should read the news to be up-to-date.

Sample 4:

Some argue that news is irrelevant to people's daily lives, making reading newspapers or watching television news programs a waste of time. However, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.

Firstly, reputable newspapers and news channels cover current affairs that significantly impact people's lives. The media serves as an effective way to disseminate information, even to the most remote places, fostering collective awareness and problem-solving. Reading prestigious sources of information, such as The Washington Post or the BBC, helps readers stay informed about global events. For instance, these outlets' in-depth reporting on issues like climate change or human rights violations can spark public discourse and inspire collective action, acting as catalysts for positive change.

Secondly, the coverage of negative stories in the media can raise awareness and prompt action towards solutions. Being informed enables individuals to avoid threats not only to their well-being but also to their community's safety. For example, extensive media coverage of cancer has led many people to adopt healthier lifestyles. Similarly, those who keep up with news about the Coronavirus pandemic can take necessary precautions to protect themselves and their families. Conversely, individuals who ignore such news may neglect essential medical procedures, thereby jeopardizing their health.

In conclusion, news is far from irrelevant; it plays a crucial role in informing and safeguarding the public, proving that consuming news is indeed a valuable and necessary activity.

Sample 5:

The relevance of news in people's lives today is in contention. Some people claim news programs are unnecessary because they offer little meaningful information. Personally, I believe news still plays a crucial role in informing people of current affairs.

One of the most significant functions of news stories is issuing warnings about upcoming or ongoing emergency problems. In case of natural disasters such as earthquakes or typhoons, broadcasters would give a brief description about the potential damage and advise locals to evacuate or take appropriate preventive measures. Without such coverage, many people would not know how to react when these situations strike, risking injuries or even deaths. Another case in point is disease outbreaks, the most recent of which being the coronavirus pandemic. If news programs had not covered extensively about the critical conditions of those already suffering from this disease, as well as promoting social distancing, it would have taken the world much longer to contain the pandemic, and countless more lives would have been lost.

News programs also serve as a window into the state of the global economy. Many countries rely on each other for energy or other resources, and should problems arise in one nation, others will also undergo shortages or shipment delays. That is why following news programs would help people understand, or perhaps prepare for the consequences of these events. Take the Russia-Ukraine conflict as an example. Because of hostility between these two nations, wheat production and exportation have been limited, thus agriculturalists around the world are trying to diversify their crops. Moreover, cargo aircrafts have had to circumvent, taking longer routes due to fear of entering Russian airspace. As a result, many regions are entering economic recession, and unemployment is on the rise.

In conclusion, although many people argue to the contrary, I am of the opinion that news is essential to our lives, giving us timely caution and also a glimpse into global events.

Sample 6:

It is claimed that news is not linked to one’s daily life, and therefore attention should not be paid to newspapers or news channels on television. Personally, I partly agree with this idea. In my opinion, while certain kinds of news are useless, there are also crucial pieces of news worth following.

On the one hand, several categories of news are simply a waste of time. The first one is updates about celebrities’ life stories, such as who they are dating or where they are spending their holidays. Although these kinds of information do not bring any value to a person, sadly, many young individuals spend more time following them than they should. Additionally, the audience tends to be attracted to shocking stories happening around the world, such as brutal murders or tragic accidents. These stories are irrelevant to people’s lives, and I believe they do not deserve to be given coverage in the press.

Nevertheless, some pieces of information could be necessary. Most importantly, people need to be aware of the serious issues currently taking place in their local area. For instance, residents need to be informed of new contagious diseases or rising cases of crime where they live, which helps them find ways to protect themselves and their families. Furthermore, a person should also follow news and updates related to their profession. For example, doctors have to keep track of the latest innovations in medicines or cures for health issues. Thus, these pieces of news are essential and should receive attention.

In conclusion, although news about famous people or shocking incidents in other parts of the globe can be considered time-wasting, other updates related to one’s career and problems in their local area are vital. In my view, people should be selective about which news to follow when they read newspapers or watch television.

Sample 7:

Some observers have argued that as news events do not often impact their everyday life, keeping up-to-date with this from newspapers and television is not an efficient use of time. Though this view might sound reasonable, I disagree, as being aware of current events through the news is beneficial and far from futile.

The stance of those who regard following the news as pointless is supported by several reasons. Initially, people can feel bothered by the lack of relevance that the news has to their immediate lives. Coverage of international conflicts or political debates, for instance, likely means little to a person who resides somewhere peaceful and politically stable. The time spent staying updated with such stately affairs, additionally, could be more productively allocated elsewhere. In fact, many people are so occupied with their work that they do not have time to consume news; these individuals, thus, could ignore the presence of current affairs in their lives altogether in order to have more time for their jobs and families. They might earn more money or become happier, as a result.

The importance of accessing news keeps it from being a waste of time, however. Firstly, doing so enables people to make informed decisions. By knowing how an area is suffering from an outbreak of disease or conflict, individuals are able to avoid traveling there or plan their trips around said location. More business-minded people, meanwhile, can take advantage of information learned from the news to make profitable choices as well. Watching news, furthermore, can help educate people on cultures and developments beyond their immediate environment. Being aware of these respects would promote understanding towards issues that, despite not impacting daily life directly, might propel individuals to become knowledgeable citizens, who can be of help to the community.

In conclusion, while some pundits dismiss the value of news consumption, I disagree with this view, as it is connected to life in various beneficial aspects. The advantages of being well-informed should not be understated, and remaining updated continues to play a consequential role in contributing to society.

Sample 8:

It is argued that there is no use in reading newspapers and watching news programs on television because news is irrelevant to people’s daily lives. From my perspective, I somewhat agree with this point of view because although I believe there is a connection between news and people’s lives, reading newspapers and watching news on television is pointless.

To begin with, I disagree that news does not have any sort of connection to everyday life. By definition, news is information or reports about recent events and are often categorized into different topics, each of which will attract a certain group of audience. For example, sport-minded people will be interested in reading sport news, while businessman will be more concerned with economic news. In other words, human’s interests in various fields will always be the glue that links news with people’s lives no matter what.

Although news is connected to people’s lives, I do believe reading newspapers or watching television news programs is a waste of time. We can read up to thousands of articles every day, yet very few of them help us make better decisions for our life, business or career. For example, weather forecasts and political news do not affect most of us. In addition, news produces news that captures viewers’ attention since the human brain reacts disproportionately to different types of information. Scandalous, shocking or people-based news, which often hold little value, stimulate us and consume a large amount of our time although we barely learn anything useful out of them.

In conclusion, I argue against the statement claiming that news has no connection to people’s lives because news reports what people are interested in. However, I firmly agree that reading news is a waste of time since it does not help people make better decisions and the media is biasing a large amount of non-helpful news.

Sample 9:

I strongly disagree with the notion that news has no connection to people's lives and that reading newspapers and watching television news programs is a waste of time. In fact, news plays a crucial role in keeping individuals informed, engaged, and empowered in the modern world.

First and foremost, news serves as a primary source of information that directly impacts people's daily lives. Whether it's updates on political decisions, economic trends, or public health issues, news provides the knowledge necessary for individuals to make informed choices. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, news outlets disseminated vital information about safety measures, vaccine distribution, and travel restrictions, enabling people to protect themselves and their communities.

Moreover, news fosters a sense of connectedness by highlighting shared experiences and global events. It allows individuals to understand the challenges faced by others and encourages empathy and solidarity. News stories about humanitarian crises, climate change, or social justice issues can inspire people to take action, donate to causes, or participate in volunteer work to make a positive impact.

Additionally, news plays a pivotal role in holding individuals and institutions accountable for their actions. News acts as a powerful watchdog, ensuring accountability in society by revealing instances of corruption, misconduct, and injustice through investigative journalism. This vital function of the news media contributes to upholding the principles of transparency, ethics, and fairness in various sectors, including government, business, and civil society. Without news coverage, instances of abuse of power or corporate malfeasance could go unchecked, potentially causing harm to society.

In conclusion, news is an indispensable part of people's lives, providing information, fostering a sense of connectedness and holding power accountable. Far from being a waste of time, staying informed through news sources is essential for personal growth and societal progress.

Sample 10:

With the relentless surge of technology, there are those who believe that news has lost its relevance and connection to the daily realities of people's lives. Such individuals view the act of reading newspapers or tuning in to televised news programs as a futile endeavor. Although there is some merit to this perspective, I respectfully disagree and contend that news remains intrinsically tied to our lives and society, especially in the context of Vietnam.

One of the main arguments posited by proponents of this view is that a significant portion of the news consists of sensationalist or irrelevant information. Indeed, with media houses constantly competing for ratings and attention, there is a tendency to prioritize shock value over substantive content. For instance, in Vietnam, the extensive coverage of celebrity scandals or minor international events sometimes eclipses pressing domestic issues like agricultural challenges or infrastructural development. Furthermore, the inundation of advertisements, which can be seen as passive forms of news, often do not directly pertain to the lives of the ordinary Vietnamese citizen. This overemphasis on trivial matters, they argue, renders news consumption an inefficient use of time.

However, I believe that despite the occasional detours into the sensational, news remains an essential conduit for information. A well-informed populace is the cornerstone of a thriving democracy. In Vietnam, for example, the coverage of policies on education reforms, public transportation projects, or international trade agreements profoundly impact the lives of its citizens. Not only do these pieces of information shape public opinion, but they also guide critical decisions, from which school to send one's children to, to voting preferences. Moreover, with the current globalized world, understanding international news allows the Vietnamese to gauge potential economic or socio-political shifts that might directly affect the nation. For example, trade policies decided in distant capitals can have immediate repercussions on Vietnam's export-oriented economy.

In conclusion, while the world of news has undoubtedly seen shifts in content prioritization, it remains a pivotal part of our daily existence. It's imperative for citizens, particularly in a rapidly developing country like Vietnam, to remain well-informed and engaged with both local and global events. The occasional frivolities of the media should not overshadow its foundational role in informing and shaping society.

Sample 11:

It is assumed that since news bears no relation to individuals’ lives, reading newspapers and watching news broadcast on TV would be worthless. From a personal perspective, I totally disapprove of this viewpoint, and the following essay would further elaborate on my stance.

To begin with, there exists certain topical affairs that are closely correlated to people’s daily lives. It stands to reason that news pertaining to several aspects namely taxes, governmental regulations or the domestic labor market exerts direct impacts on the livelihood and lifestyle of people in a particular nation. Hence, being notified of such information can compel them to make timely and appropriate adjustments in accordance with ongoing changes in society, thereby having more active control over their day-to-day activities.

In addition, being updated with local and international news in today’s world has become increasingly essential, particularly for young generations. In the current era of hyper connectivity and global digitization, the pressure relating to responsibility heaped on the youth simultaneously becomes acute more than ever. On such ground, it is pivotal that they keep track of news relating to global events with a view to becoming global citizens and successfully integrating to worldwide advancements.

Many may argue that being informed of the latest happenings is a waste of time and effort, an opinion I do not endorse. Indisputably, as society develops, it is being confronted with more intractable problems revolving around education, climate change, pandemic or gender equality. Therefore, by keeping track of news via newspapers and TV broadcast, citizens worldwide can be cognizant of the severity and urgency of such problems, thus making concerted efforts to contribute to the resolution of global pressing issues.

In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that individuals should read newspapers and watch TV news programs for their both individual and social development; therefore, I would totally disagree with the idea of undermining the role of news. To some extent, obtaining news is vital for individuals to become a well-informed and ethical citizen.

Sample 12:

Many people consider news irrelevant to our daily lives, arguing that acquiring new information via newspapers or television is unnecessary and time-consuming. However, I believe that staying informed can still profoundly impact people's lives and is worth the effort.

Firstly, news continues to influence our lives in several ways, especially in enhancing our ability to make sensible decisions. In recent years, many digital newspapers have reported substandard quality of products from fast fashion brands such as H&M, Zara, and Shein. By acquiring this information, consumers can decide not to purchase these products, thus protecting their benefits. Additionally, such reports can pressure companies to improve their practices, showcasing how informed consumers can drive positive change. Therefore, it is reasonable to state that news can affect consumers' decisions and maintain its relevance.

Furthermore, the importance of staying updated with the news should not be underestimated. Due to the ever-changing nature of the world, information must be updated rapidly, often within days or even hours, to avoid dire consequences. For instance, news about weather events or natural disasters should be reported promptly so affected people can be alerted, evacuated, and casualties can be avoided. In such cases, staying connected with the news is not just beneficial but can be a matter of life and death.

In summary, although some view news as insignificant, its relevance cannot be overstated. News plays an essential role in making sound decisions and ensuring safety, such as choosing products wisely and receiving critical alerts during emergencies, helping us citizens effectively manage the complexities of contemporary life.

Sample 13:

It is believed by some that news has nothing to do with people's day-to-day lives and thus, it is pointless to spend time reading news or watching news channels. I believe that rather than a waste of time, there is actually a lot to gain by watching news on the TV and reading newspapers.

There are many reasons why people should keep themselves up to date with news events. Firstly, news is the main source of information about the government policies, which directly impact people's lives. In other words, people can be better prepared to deal with changes in laws if they read the news. For example, when traffic fines were increased, many people were caught unaware and had to pay huge fines. Thus, news makes people better informed citizens.

Secondly, news is a source of inspiration. When people hear or read about other's misfortunes and how they overcame them, they learn to be resilient. Not only that, when they learn about others’ adversity, they learn to appreciate what they have in life, and it encourages them to help and support others. Inspiration can also come in the form of innovative ideas about business. When people hear about others’ success stories, they are motivated to work hard and challenge their limits.

Thirdly, in this era of many truths, newspapers are the only thing that can help us differentiate the actual truth from the many rumours. By watching credible and objective news, people can learn how to distinguish fact from fiction, which in turn develops people's critical thinking abilities as well. Finally, it would be wrong to not consider the role of news in enhancing people's language and vocabulary skills.

To summarize, listening to the news or reading the paper daily is very important to be a part of the global village of today.

Sample 14:

It is claimed that spending time on reading or watching news is absolutely wasteful. Truth be told, I find it hard to agree because having access to daily news is a must to be well informed about what is going on in the world and to be equipped with specialized knowledge for conducting further scientific research.

For the general public, it is advisable to be aware of the current state of affairs. This is certainly directly related to individual life. A typical example of this close relationship is what people should do in case of war. More specifically, after reading news about the outbreak of a war near them, people may immediately prepare food for fear of the possibility of food shortages.

Those who work as scientists are always in need of updated information from news reports about various fields. These range from education to economics and healthcare. For instance, news about the current coronavirus has pushed researchers all over the world to compete 24/7 in inventing a vaccine against it. As a result, it can be argued that news is closely related to the outside world whether common people or experts in the scientific world are taken into consideration.

Summarizing, when it comes to the belief that reading news in newspapers or watching news on television programs is a total waste of time, I am not convinced at all. This is merely because all people need news no matter what job they are engaged in. Depending on their occupation, people might obtain different useful pieces of information when they are exposed to one and the same news item.

Sample 1:

Some people think that the government should allocate more financial resources to medical research instead of environmental protection. I entirely disagree with this statement.

Both medical research activities and environmental protection are equally critical to human well-being. Throughout history, we have had to cope with countless consequences of environmental damage, some of which even threatened the survival of whole communities. We have also been struggling to combat diseases that could cripple the medical systems of entire countries. The peril that people face from those threats cannot be compared with one another by any measures; if they were to be addressed, tremendous government funding would be needed.

Furthermore, preserving the environment is a necessary part of protecting human health. It is true that funding medical research activities is the best way to cure the many serious diseases that are now causing so many problems all over the world, such as Covid-19. However, it is flawed to use this reason to downplay the significance of environmental protection and the need for government funding. In reality, we are facing many other severe health crises that arise from environmental pollution. For example, high levels of air and water contamination are leading to the increased number of cancer cases and deaths. Extreme weather conditions caused by global warming are also among the greatest drivers behind the deterioration of public health.

In conclusion, although medical research is certainly important and should be properly funded, I disagree that it should receive more money from the government than environmental protection.

Sample 2:

Government plays a crucial role in the management of our society. It has been reasoned that the state should invest heavily in the healthcare sector rather than the environmental sector. This essay will explore this topic and present a firm opinion.

To begin with, environmental protection has become an extremely contentious topic. Although it is obvious that humans are capable of damaging the natural world, the extent to which this takes place, and the lasting effect are very much contested. Governments should spend money on indirect methods of environmental protectionism such as educating the public and offering various incentives to those who strive to keep both artificial and natural spaces clean. Firstly, it is relatively inexpensive for political leaders to produce public service announcements on social media outlets such as Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter. Secondly, cash rebates, grocery store vouchers, and tax deductions can be utilized in order to persuade citizens to be “greener”.

Next, a similar case to the above could be made for the healthcare sector. People often do not feel comfortable with the government being involved with personal matters of health and wellness. The extent to which the government is involved in needs does not go further than increasing public health awareness and promoting healthy living. Politicians are neither business nor health professionals. Therefore, the research and development of health care products and services should be left to passionate entrepreneurs, medical practitioners, and scientific professionals. Recently, the world has witnessed a global pandemic, and several private sector companies and manufacturers have successfully produced millions of masks and thousands of life-saving ventilators. Although the government has helped to manage distribution, it has heavily relied on privately owned companies.

In conclusion, governments do serve a vital role in the management and maintenance of society; however, their duties need not go as far as to affect the lives of citizens in an overtly personal way. Governments should instead shift their focus to environmental matters. Perhaps in the future, the state will occupy a more limited role and allow the private sector to do what it does best.

Sample 3:

It is said that government funding should be spent on raising the general level of health instead of environmental preservation. However, I consider this a short-sighted proposal, since there is a direct relationship between health and the quality of the surrounding environment.

The reason why such a strategy will not work is that if the government somehow manages to improve people's health while neglecting the environment, the positive effects will sooner or later diminish. Potential hazards to human health caused by a polluted environment are numerous, including respiratory diseases from prolonged exposure to air pollution, gastrointestinal infections from the direct use of contaminated water, and skin problems from contact with hazardous waste. Such examples mean that even a healthy person will be likely to become ill if he is put in poorly sanitized surroundings. Even if he fully recovers, he will still be exposed to the same hazards if the environment is left unclean. This creates a vicious cycle in which the government keeps diverting resources towards the medical sector but to no avail.

To solve the problem at its root, what the government should do is to adopt environmental policies. Investment in environmental preservation is a sound approach as it not only helps the local residents but also people in other places, who might not directly reap the benefits of a clean environment. For example, Vietnamese people were affected by the Formosa marine environmental disaster, however, since green policies were introduced, sea water has now been cleansed, which leads to cleaner and fresher fish harvested and sold to consumers. This shows that even if consumers do not live near the newly cleansed environment, they will still benefit from it.

In conclusion, I believe it is wrong to allocate funds from environmental protection towards solely improving citizens' health.

Sample 4:

It is often argued that in order for a country to progress more funding should be allocated to medical research instead of environmental protection. While I agree that health research does need extra funding, this should not be at the expense of environmental preservation, which is also crucial to a country’s development.

The first benefit of funding for clinical research is that it can have enormous impacts on human health. This is because clinical experience can provide valuable feedback for improving the use of drugs. For example, the approval of a vaccine is based on a series of controlled clinical trials, often with a few hundred patients, but after approval, it can save millions of lives. Therefore, tracking clinical experience with the drug is important for determining the effectiveness in different populations. Conversely, without sufficient funding from the government, scientists could not carry out necessary research to develop new medicines and treatment guidelines for the public.

On the other hand, I also support government spending on the environment as only the government can pass laws to protect the environment and create regulations to enforce those laws. For example, the government can regulate wastewater management by requiring industries to emit only acceptable amounts of specific pollutants. Furthermore, another large-scale measure that only the government can do is promote green energy. They could invest more in new-energy technologies to find better alternatives to fossil fuels. By doing so, each country can reduce its global emissions from energy production.

In conclusion, while I agree that clinical research should receive substantial funding from the government because of its tremendous benefits for the community, I still feel that only large-scale funding from the government can address environmental issues.

Sample 5:

Many believe governments today should prioritise funding for medicine over environmental studies. In my opinion, learning more about the environment is one way to inform policy regarding climate change but more money should be directed towards medical research.

Those advocating for increased focus on the environment are eager to understand and counter the effects of climate change. There is arguably no greater threat facing the future of human civilisation than a degrading natural world. At the moment, billions are being poured into studies to understand how fast the polar ice caps are melting, what the impact will be, the damage to ecosystems, the interrelation between humans and these delicate ecosystems as well as the role of fossil fuels in aggravating climate change. There are wildly different theories about all these areas, and some think the best utilisation of research grants is to give scientists free rein to study and collaborate in the hope of coming to a stronger consensus, which can then shape international accords and domestic policy decisions.

Despite the force of the above argument, I believe health is a more tangible and pressing concern. There is constant disagreement from climate scientists, and it is unclear if increased funding would be a remedy or injury. Health research is unequivocally positive. Some of the many advances in health from the last several decades include increased understanding of mental illness, less invasive procedures for surgery, better vaccines, and countless new iterations of advanced medical equipment. These are all put into practice immediately and save or better lives in every country around the world. More money for research now would open up possibilities for new medical innovations that could involve experimentation with genetic modification and greater understanding of disease prevention.

In conclusion, making sense of climate change is important but nothing is more essential than one’s health. Governments ought to find ways to balance these competing interests but also be mindful of what most benefits their present citizenry.

Sample 1:

Today technology has changed how people interact with each other. I believe the biggest effects it has had on relationships are that it has reduced in-person interaction and that it has led to the development of online relationships. This has been a positive development because often cyber relationships are more meaningful than in-person relationships.

Technology has reduced face-to-face interaction. For instance, it is not uncommon to see two people sitting at the same table in a restaurant, checking their phones every 30 seconds, and only talking to each other occasionally.

Technology has also given rise to online relationships. Nowadays anyone that has access to the Internet and computers can create a free Facebook or Twitter account and build their social networks on these platforms no matter where on the planet they reside. Take, for example, Chinese teenagers who like collecting insects. On the Internet, they can find and connect with others who share this particular hobby, even if those people live in the Amazon rainforest.

This should be seen as a positive trend because cyberspace relationships can be very meaningful. Today it is very common that those in a person's immediate circle do not support what they pursue. For example, many street artists are looked down on by their family members. Fortunately, Facebook groups give them the power to build their own communities where they can support each other. The inspiration and motivation they obtain there can drive them to work hard to move toward their goals.

In conclusion, technology has reduced in-person interaction and has meanwhile enabled online relationships. This has definitely been a positive trend because online relationships are often more satisfying and meaningful than face-to-face ones.

Sample 2:

Technology is a crucial tool for communication in modern times. It is flourishing in each and every field of communication. Though this invention has changed the way people interact around the world, it has both positive and negative impact on the relationship of people.  

To embark on, with regard to the positive development, technological advancement has made communication between organizations more convenient and time-saving. Many companies and organizations use tools like social media, email and forum to influence a larger number of audiences. This also serves as an advanced mode of learning since schools adopt the method of smart classrooms. With the availability of ecommerce, freelance websites, social media marketing, people can easily buy and sell products and services with effortless communication.

On the other hand, the drawbacks of technology on the relationships of people cannot be ignored. Though technology has advanced greatly, it still lacks the emotional touch of communication. It has affected the love and affection people crave with communication. Millennials today are more fascinated by the virtual world, thereby forgetting the practical side of life. Modern modes of communication are making people busy and less productive. Sharing personal information on social media also invades people’s privacy. For example, individuals spending hours on social media interaction interacting with people from around the world and wasting their valuable time. In fact, family vacation which was previously a private affair has now become a public affair.

To sum up, communication technology can be a blessing or a curse depending upon how people make use of it. Even though it is an easy method of interaction, the relationships formed through technological interaction lack trust and emotion. Hence, people should give preference to face-to-face communication.

Sample 3:

It is evident that technology has transformed the ways of communication and influenced relationships in a variety of ways. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects of this.

The principal way in which relationships have been affected is that they tend to be at a distance rather than face-to-face. The advent of the internet has made it easy for business owners to communicate across the world, with remote job opportunities one call away. Online educational programs are available for people residing in different countries, and it is no longer a dream to attend live classes from the comfortable environment of a home. Not only this, the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube have revolutionized relationships, be it making online friendships with people from other countries or staying in touch with loved ones. Based on this perspective, technology has influenced relationships in a positive way. 

However, despite these advances, the quality of interaction has significantly declined in several respects. If people are developing most of their relationships online, this means that they may also have less fact-to-face contact. This kind of contact on a personal level is important for human beings to feel wanted and a part of society. This may be a particular problem for children's social development as they used to be seen playing out on the streets but are now too often indoors. Technology can also mean people are detached from what is going on around them even when they are out, as can be seen by the many people staring into their mobile phones as they travel or walk around. 

In conclusion, technology has brought some positive developments in the ways people interact with each other. However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on the types of relationships people make. 

Sample 4:

Technology has hardly left any human feeling untouched. Instead, it has played a great role in manipulating and transforming it to a great extent. One of the most highly impacted aspects in this context is human interaction.

Technology has laid its hands on human behavior and has greatly influenced the pattern of human interaction since its introduction. From social media platforms to FaceTime applications, staying in touch has become easier with time. However, it has its downsides as well. With such high-end digital connections, intimate relationships have seen a significant decrease ever since.

These changes result from the freedom of hiding genuine emotions that technology brings. People can now fake caring about someone, express false love, and connect just for the sake of words. This has led to loosened family bonds, false promises between partners, and much more. People do interact with each other, but this interaction is often fake and untrue. Technology's significant impact on human interaction leads to various unwanted consequences. A surge in depression cases, suicides, and unwise decisions have been recorded as a result of such interactions.

Hence, technology has influenced the way people interact both positively and negatively. Undoubtedly, it has helped humans connect from miles away with their loved ones yet has made relations less meaningful and degraded their overall quality.

Sample 5:

Technology has brought vast changes in human behavior since its introduction. Moreover, with its rapid advancement and new changes, it is impacting relationships more rapidly. Interactions have recently been made more accessible due to technology. People can now connect easily and from the ease of their homes. However, it also has its downsides. A detailed study of this significant impact on human relationships due to technology can be understood with various examples.

In recent years, technology has helped humans stay connected at all times. With technology spreading its arms, connections can be made even in the most unexpected and tribal areas of the world. However, this has ultimately transformed human behavior and the way people interact with each other.

A prime example of this change is how people interact since social media's introduction. The introduction of social media platforms has made it easier for people to connect with their loved ones, even at a distance. However, it has entirely transformed how people interact with their close surroundings. This has also led to the expression of fake feelings and false expressions.

Overall, technology has transformed the entire interaction cycle of human beings without letting us realize it. More connections over the internet have paved the way for broken real-life relationships and have ultimately degraded the quality of relationships.

Sample 6:

There has been a change in the different aspects of social relations as affected by technology which we can introduced as more of a post-positively than post-negatively impact.

First, technology has immensely extended the speed and convinience of communication and thus the worth of relationships. For example, a university learner who is learning in another country can use video-calling to speak with the parents daily. An instantaneous means of communication makes it easier to avoid having to wait for a letter to arrive for a day or more as is the norm. Furthermore, social networks allow a person to get acquanted with like-minded strangers with similar interests, career choices, or hobbies, therefore create friendships that last a lifetime.

Despite this perception, this development is fairly beneficial to the masses. Improved communication technology reduces pressure and creates the need for belonging. For instance, when there is negative information, people get to act quickly. Also, positive information is more effective when shared immediately and it helps enhance interpersonal relationships. In addition, this has led to the growth of businesses and the eradication of geographical barriers whereby a company can comfortably and easily transact business with an organization in another country at any given time.

Altogether, it can be highlighted that technology plays a vital role in changing social relations by providing more effective and pleasant means of communication. It has made interpersonal communication better, provided businesses with links and connections as well as made everyone have equal access to information. Thus, it can be concluded that the purpose and use of technology have been mainly beneficial for interactions and relationships for the majority of people.

Sample 7:

It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.

Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow businesspeople in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.

On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result ofisolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these 'virtual' relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.

In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.

Sample 8:

There has been a complex alteration in the various aspects of social relations due to technological advancement resulting in more positive impact than negatives.

First of all, the usage of technology has tremendously augmented the speed and ease of interaction making the relations’ depth richer. For example, a university student studying in another country can utilize video-calling to maintain quotidian contact with his or her parents. Real-time messaging banishes the lengthy wait for the letter, which was taken as conventional before. Besides, one is able to interact with strangers with similar interests, jobs, or hobbies, hence fostering friendships that endure a lifetime.

This development is predominantly propitious for the people. Advanced communication technology reduces stress and creates a feeling of belongingness. For instance, the sectional publicity of negative information can be quickly followed by timely responses. And just as to promote the fast exchange of positive messages, cooperation is strengthened between people. In addition, this technological advancement has boosted business development and erased hegemonic constraints and restrictions that enable business organizations to freely and easily connect with global organizations at any time.

Therefore, one is able to deduce that relations in society have been significantly mediated by technology in the manner in which humans interact offering more effective and fulfilling ways. It has made interpersonal communication easier, created business relationships and opportunities, and given equal opportunity for information access. Hence, the major impact of technology is analyzing and interpreting common interaction and relationship profiles that can be deemed more beneficial and helpful for most people.

Sample 9:

The advent and rapid development of technology have fundamentally transformed the dynamics of interpersonal interactions among individuals. This has also transformed the way we form relationships and bond with each other. This essay contends that the evolution of technology has, in fact, catalyzed a positive shift in the types of relationships people form, fostering connectivity and enhancing social engagement.

Technology has diversified the ways individuals establish and maintain relationships. Social media platforms, for instance, have facilitated connections among individuals globally, transcending geographical barriers. Additionally, online dating applications have revolutionized how people meet and form romantic relationships, offering a wide array of choices and opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals. Technology has also gifted us swift and interactive communication with loved ones no matter the distance. For instance, someone living abroad can make video calls and talk to his or her family members whenever they want. This has reduced the communication gap and significantly enhanced our options to contact others in real-time unlike in the past when sending handwritten letters was perhaps the best option to convey messages or contact someone.

This evolution in the types of relationships forged through technology signifies a positive development. Online connectivity allows individuals to maintain contact with friends, family, and acquaintances across vast distances. Moreover, digital platforms enable marginalized groups, such as those with disabilities or introverted personalities, to establish meaningful connections they may struggle to form in traditional social settings. For instance, social networking sites provide platforms for introverted individuals to express themselves and interact comfortably, fostering self-confidence and social skills.

In conclusion, the impact of technology on relationship dynamics has been transformative, offering diverse avenues for connectivity and social interaction. The ability to form connections across distances and the empowerment of individuals who face social barriers underscore the positive aspects of technological advancements. Embracing these changes in relationship dynamics signifies a positive shift towards enhanced connectivity and inclusivity in contemporary society.

Sample 10:

The ubiquitous presence of technology has undoubtedly redefined the landscape of human interaction, altering the very nature of how we build and maintain relationships. While the advancements of the digital age offer a plethora of tools for communication and connection, a closer examination reveals a disturbing trend – the erosion of genuine, meaningful relationships.

With technology, we make friends more often than ever. We also have a variety of tools to connect with others and remain in touch with people we care about. But one undeniable consequence of this technology-driven relationship is the rise of superficial and fleeting interactions online. Social media platforms, while fostering a sense of instant connectivity, often facilitate shallow exchanges and curated self-presentation. In the pursuit of likes and followers, meaningful conversations and authentic connections are often sacrificed, fostering a culture of virtual intimacy that lacks the depth and genuineness of face-to-face interaction. 

As a result, of the constant bombardment of digital stimuli can contribute to social anxiety and a fear of missing out, hindering our ability to develop genuine relationships. The pressure to maintain an online presence and curate a perfect digital persona can lead individuals to withdraw from real-world interactions, hindering their ability to connect authentically with others. And this is a disturbing outcome of our digital relationship. Additionally, the ease of virtual communication can discourage individuals from developing the interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence necessary for navigating the complexities of face-to-face interaction. For example, a young adult accustomed to online communication might struggle to hold engaging conversations in person, leading to feelings of awkwardness and missed opportunities for meaningful connections.

In conclusion, while technology undoubtedly offers tools for communication and connection, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and potential pitfalls. By prioritizing face-to-face interaction, fostering genuine conversations, and actively engaging with our communities, we can strive to counteract the negative effects of technology on our relationships and cultivate a more meaningful and fulfilling social life.

Sample 11:

There is no doubt that many things have changed in the last few decades; some changes are for the better and some changes are for the worse. One of the fields which were greatly affected by the advent of technology is the way of interaction and communication.

Without any doubt, technology has changed the way we lead our lives, and these changes have been prominent over the last decade. There are several improvements in life due to the positive effects of technology and there are some negative impacts as well. One area that has dramatically changed is the way we communicate and maintain our relationship nowadays. And in my opinion, technology has positively affected our communication and the way we make relationships and maintain it. Despite some negative effects, most of us enjoy the positive things technology has bought for us. In the past, the ways of interaction were very limited. Unleash your imagination; if you want to speak with your friend, you would have to go directly to his house or send him a message which may take a few days to get a response. I completely believe that technology has a great tangible effect on our communication. Nowadays, it's very easy to interact with your relatives - and even with the government and organisations - either by emails, mobiles, chatting, etc. and I think that this has improved and enhanced the relationships.

We no longer need to visit a relative or friend to get updates. Alternatively, we can let them know our updates instantly. Besides personal communications, official and business communications have become easier. Email campaigns offer a good marketing opportunity for business owners and people can complain about a certain thing using emails without exposing their identity. Not all of the people have the availability of technology, and they still use the old form of communication. People now can deceive others using identity theft and fraud identity. The personal touch of communication like handwritten letters, face-to-face communications were more effective in some cases. Like meeting your friend is still more important than just writing him an email.

We make so many friends via chatting or social networking which would not have been possible without the advancement of technology and its contribution to communication. Cell phones, emails and social networking have enhanced the way of communicating and we can talk to anyone with a minimum cost. It's now not unusual to prepare for a visit and even several visits to your relatives and friends on the same day, while in the past this may have taken several weeks or months.

To conclude, despite all that, I still see some failings in the development of the means of interaction. For instance, the very high cost each person spends every day on communication. Another defect is that many elderly people are not accustomed to this modern technology. But that doesn't have a great effect on the positive role technology has made in the field of interaction between people and I think these defects are very easy to be solved.

Sample 12:

A true relationship between two people requires face to face communication and time to truly get to know each other. Regardless of what humans think, all individuals admire the feeling of being wanted even if it’s a lie. The digital world has created the sense that it is passable to be who anyone wishes to be online. However, I believe that the way people know each other online and the type of relationships they make virtually have changed for the worse.

Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, most are being turned inward, forgetting the true definition of a friend. Human beings have feelings, and they feel broken at times and do not always smile but the Internet only shows one's happy moments keeping one from fully being known. The types of friendships people make these days are quick and short-lasting. In real life friendship, people see each other at one’s best and worst time and remain there for one another. This can never be compared to a social network friendship. One can only get to know someone by spending time together for the reason that the Internet cannot replace shared experience and personal communication. However, due to the Internet, people can make friends anywhere in the world which was quite impossible in the past era. Finding school and college friends and getting in touch with them is an advantage that the Internet offers to us. However, true friendship is not possible if two people do not spend time together, share their common interests, talk a lot and help each other both in good and bad times.

Rightfully, life is meant to be lived and have many physical experiences, bonding with another person’s physical presence. Instead of being a true friend to the people around each other, they are spending time online to make friends. This is, in my opinion, a negative aspect of the digital era.

In conclusion, making friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends could be the advantages of the digital era but the way we are becoming dependent on the technology and the way we are pretending to maintain our friendship online have negative consequences on our personal, moral and social aspects.

Sample 13:

It is true that technology in recent years has altered the path that people communicate with each other. There are many ways that technology affects our relationships, and in my opinion, this is a beneficial development.

To begin with, the most obvious transformation in people’s relationships is how they communicate with each other. By this, I mean that the Internet has converted the world into a small village and nowadays people around the world can reach each other easily and rapidly. For example, a friend who lives in the UK can chat and talk with their friends in China using a mobile phone or social network.

Another field in which technology affects our life is the way that people make friends. In other words, it has been observed that these days we can make friends from all nationalities without any effort or travel, and this helps with culture interchange and help people who suffer.

In my thought, this has a positive impact on the community for two reasons. Firstly, human life has become more convenient, this provides people with more opportunity to spend their leisure time with their kin. For instance, with the Internet, we can shop and work from our dwelling house without going outside anymore. Secondly, travel around the globe has become usable and cheap. As a result, people visiting each other and spend a lot of time together hence more connected society emerges.

To conclude, as we have found out there is no easy answer to this question. Nevertheless, technology makes a huge difference in peoples' lives in terms of communication and I believe that this is a positive impact in our society.

Sample 14:

From the last century to the present days, there have been many changes in the way people interact with each other as there have been evolutionary changes in technological fields. One may say this transformation has negative effects on relationships between people or positive effects. I believe that there have been more positive effects than negative ones among the people due to the reasons that in few seconds of time people can contact their dearest ones and technology gives strength to people by making them closer to each other even if they are not.

From the introduction of telecommunication and electronic mail, the lives of people turned out to be easier and communication among people became easier and more convenient. They can contact their families and friends using these advanced services over the countries. Without visiting their homes frequently, they can make money or accomplish their goals. For example, a military man has to serve his country at the borders, and it is uneasy to go home and spend some time with his family and acquaintances thoroughly. However, he can make contact with his family via telephone and other services. With the help of telecommunication and electronic mail, he can keep in touch with his family and buddies. In this way, technology makes people close to each other. This absolutely positive development as we have huge benefits using technology.

With the absence of one's dearest one, he used to be all alone before the introduction of technology. But it is possible to get in touch with his sweetheart. And also, he can send and receive the money within seconds over the thousands of miles using the latest money transfer machines. As a result, he can look over and take care of his family's financial problems and needs without his presence at his home. For instance, my uncle who stays in the United States calls his family and others via ‘Skype’ daily whereas, my dad who used to work in Dubai could not keep in touch with us as at that time the telecommunication had not installed in my village. Thus, that made my father bound to visit us frequently. Consequently, he spent a large amount of money travelling and could not communicate with us as frequently as he wanted to.

In many positive ways, technology has affected the relationships between people, and I would say these are positive developments. Imagine without technology, what would happen to the people and the world. In many ways, we are getting the help of using technology.

Sample 15:

Technological developments in this modern era have transformed the way we socialise. Advancements in communication networks have played a vital role in bringing people closer. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this development and this essay will analyse how technology has changed the types of relationships made by people.

In ancient times, people used letters and telegrams to interact with each other. With the advent of modern communication systems like the telephone and the Internet, people can collaborate more effectively. For instance, we can interact through emails rather than letter and businessman can have online meetings through the conference calls.

Another reason is the widespread use of social networks over the internet; for instance, Facebook, where men and women can now make friends online and interact with them through the post, message and online chat. Video conferencing in the form of Skype has improved instructor and student relationship. Online messaging platforms like mIRC have given people the luxury to choose their own discussion-based chat rooms. There are more ways to socialise now than there used to be in the past.

All these advancements in technology come up with their merits and demerits. Letters, memos and telegrams are replaced by emails and text messages. Human resource hiring can be done through online video conferencing which has eliminated the need for physical presence and travelling requirement. We can now mingle more through Facebook, Pinterest, Google+, Instagram and Orkut and so on. Though one can regard these as positive developments, they do have some negative aspects. These developments have isolated people and discouraged real-world interaction. For instance, youth, in particular, prefers to choose to mix up with people online rather than socialising with them in the real world.

To conclude, technology has no doubt revolutionised the way we interact and hang out but has greatly reduced real-world interaction. Though these virtual relations tend to be positive, we should not deny the importance of physical interaction in our lives.

Sample 16:

Everything has two sides, and the effects of technology on people’s relationships are not an exception. We cannot deny how much technology has transformed the individual reaction with others in his family and the surrounding community.

In my opinion, technology has affected and transformed our life aspects and dealing with other people in a good way. Recently, we have had different fast and cheap methods to call our family and friends. Moreover, some technologies are giving us chances to see and talk with them at the same time. In addition, we are informed on a daily basis with the last updates and news about our friends and family, so we can remember birthdays, graduation parties and even marriage anniversaries. Furthermore, these methods make it faster and easier to call and congratulate another individual.

On the other hand, many people believe that technology is affecting individual relationships badly. They opine that, if we did not have these kinds of technology, we would have been visiting each other regularly.

Not only that, but individuals will not be isolated from each other, especially those who are addicted to using social networking platforms.  As a matter of fact, people rarely talk to each other face-to-face. In particular, people’s personalities are changing so much, because of addiction to using Facebook. It’s one of the vital reasons to decrease confidence and self-esteem.

As can be seen, even if we have some bad effects of technology and how it changed the way people contact each other, we still have much more effects. We can obtain many easy and cheaper methods to contact each other. In fact, technology has enhanced our life and the way we are contacting each other.

Sample 17:

Today, various brand-new methods of telecommunications have tremendously influenced social behaviour. Although their impacts have benefited human lifestyle, they have had some costs as well. However, before evaluating their advantages and disadvantages, it is better to reveal how these breakthroughs affect the ways people relate to each other.

In the old times, when someone wanted to communicate, there were extremely limited means of doing so. Indeed, he should write a letter or have a face-to-face conversation. Likewise, it was possible to be acquainted with new faces either by meeting them personally or being introduced by family and friends.

On the other hand, substantial technological progress has happened in recent years. For instance, smartphones can be utilised both by direct calls and via different applications. Alternatively, the internet can be used either by offline methods like e-mail or by online protocols like chatting programs. Moreover, social networking is another rich aspect of the internet by which everybody is able to find new friends or search for old, missed ones, and it can be used to interact with current relatives as well. Clearly, not only have modern technologies facilitated human interactions, but they also diversified his relationships.

On the debit side, excessive use of virtual connections might weaken the personal relationship with reality. While it seems that people are aware of each other’s statuses on a daily basis, even up-to-the-minute, they may overlook loved ones’ emotional states due to the negligence of their presence.

All in all, contemplating the pros and cons of these phenomena simultaneously, I should say it depends on the person who utilises these state-of-the-art technologies. If he applies them wisely, their pluses will definitely overshadow their pitfalls. After all, in my viewpoint, humankind can eventually address this issue in favour of his civilisation. Hence, I assume it as a mainly positive development in the long run.

Sample 18:

People used to communicate by meeting each other while it has nowadays totally changed since technological advancement. Some assert that utilising technology in daily communication brings more harm than good things. I personally agree with this view and this essay will look into the reason with some considerations.

The first effect of technology usage is that it reduces the sense of togetherness among people. Since they do interaction via telecommunication such as a mobile phone or the internet, it reduces the personal relationship. People cannot catch moments during interaction because they communicate in unreal situations. Take social media as an example, most teenagers talk to their friend via utilising Facebook, Viber, WhatsApp or others. They tend to interact with each other via sending messages thus they can feel the situation or even communication sense just by reading the messages. By contrast, direct communication tends to develop a sense of belonging among people. They will be more comfortable expressing their feelings thus it is easy to get along together.

In addition, it will deteriorate the human behaviour. By using electronic devices in the daily life of communication, it is hard for them to get involved in a social environment. It will decrease their self-confidence to speak in public because they usually interact through devices rather than through face-to-face communication. Moreover, utilising technology in interaction is not free thus you should they should prepare much budget just for communication.

It is true that technology usages enable people to keep in touch with people who live in different places. However, it is not capable of providing a sense of feeling as well as direct communication.

To sum up, by communicating directly, it will help people keep close to each other and able to talk towards them easily and expressively.

Sample 19:

The 21st century has been a game-changer in all aspects of human life. The same case is with relationships which have also taken on a new dimension with technological advancement. Nowadays, relationships are much more fragile, materialistic, mistrustful and doubtful as compared to previous times. I reckon that overall, this development has been quite negative which will be analysed in our paragraphs to follow.

To start with, nowadays technology has made relationships between humans quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationships just on social networking websites without even knowing who is actually communicating with them. For instance, there have been many cases in which the person you are in contact with is actually fake and fraud. He is just playing and making a fool of you, and you believe that you are making a friend or falling in love with him. Consequently, when you know the truth, it is just like a bolt from the blue and your feeling is eradicated. This is evident from the argument above the reality that technological relationships can be quite painful sometimes.

Further, in the new era connections between people can be quite fragile and weak as compared to the strength of relationships before the advent of technology. People without practically meeting each other and actually knowing their strengths and weaknesses tend to trust each other too much and when they face the true facts the relationships are affected and, in some cases, broken down. For instance, a survey was conducted by Indian newspaper regarding the success of technology relationships and the result was reconciling with the point that relationships are very poor, and the failure rate was quite high.

To sum up, these technological relationships have altered the connectivity between two people. I firmly believe that drawbacks outweigh much more as compared to the fruits of these new relationships. However, it is recommended that people should be extremely careful and cautious in making any sought of relationships on social networking websites, chatting software etc.

Sample 20:

Technology has been affecting many aspects of human life including the way people interact with one another. Some believe that it has more benefits for people’s connection than drawbacks, while others contradict it. I personally argue with the former opinion, and through this essay, I am going to explain my reasons.

Initially, the first reason that I am going to elaborate is the way technology better enhances communication among people. A large number of communication gadgets has been invented in order to help communication between people, even for those who are separated by spacious distance, getting simpler and quicker. Thus, by giving an easier chance to be connected, this development has been encouraging society’s sense of togetherness. They do not have to visit their colleagues which are in different regions or cities to ask about their condition, for instance, because they could just pick up their phone and call their friends.

Subsequently, the variety of communication technology has been developed even further. The purpose is not only to make it easier but also to achieve a better quality of communication. We can mention video call, voice messenger and social media as the parts of it. The users are not limited by the elder method of phone call anymore. They can communicate more interactively by using video call. Therefore, they can communicate with others in the wider range of connection by using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. This situation will globally lead people into a worldwide relationship.

On the other hand, there has been a developing trend that people are becoming more individualistic as the effect of technological development. The decreasing opportunity of direct interaction among them is accused as the root of this problem. However, it depends on us as the users to utilise technology wisely. If we can maintain a balance between communication technology and the conventional way of communication, the problem will certainly disappear.

Eventually, the advantages of using technology as part of our communication types outweigh the disadvantages, as long as we can manage it to be the helper, not the loser.

Sample 21:

It is true that some people have shifted their way to keep in touch with others due to the innovation of technology. The massive use of devices in communication, particularly phones and the internet, can be identified as the main difference compared to the past.People rely on those technologies to connect with families, friends and colleagues. Personally, I reckon that this trend may lead people to have a better relationship due to the effectiveness and low cost of communication.

To begin with, the interaction of individuals is presently not limited in one model. It means that people have many choices to stay connected with others than before. Technology offers some applications such as email, Facebook or Twitter. Those social media serve advantages to enhance and build a relationship with others. For example, in workplaces, employees do not have to meet in a certain place to discuss something. Rather they can use video conference to do a meeting. Therefore, various types of communication tools can help people to choose their preference and purpose in communication.

Furthermore, the usage of technology in communication leads to some positive things. It can be assumed that the easiness and effectiveness which are offered by these devices maximise the quality of people life in term of maintenance the relation of people. In addition, these communication tools allow people to spend less money and time. In other words, individuals do not have to visit someone when they want to talk or know friends’ news. Young people nowadays have friends from different countries and can have more friends. They can share their thoughts and updates instantly, which was quite impossible in the past. Some people might argue that people rely too much on technology and that’s they keep a less personal relationship with others. However, I disagree and want to say that technology has made it possible to connect with a dear one, make new friends and build up relationships in a more convenient way.

In conclusion, people always pick the best and most efficient way of communication, and the widespread use of the internet, mobile phone and other ways of communication have positively impacted our life and the way we make and keep our relationship.

Sample 22:

It is commonly noticed that people surrounding us stay connected with other people via social networking sites or other applications and technology have totally changed the way people used to communicate, make friends and keep their relationship. This paradigm shift happened basically because of the advances in technology and widespread use of such technological applications. Shall we welcome this shift or be wary about the changes? In this essay, I am going to discuss how technology has affected the types of relationships people make and whether it is considered as a positive or negative development.

First and foremost, I think that the development of technology has enhanced the relationships people make and maintain. For instance, when a student studies abroad and stays far away from his or her family and friends, social networking sites and other applications can help the student stay connected with his or her family and friends through Skype, for instance. In my opinion, in this case, this is a positive development to deal with homesickness or maintain our interactions with people we care about. Compared to the past decade, when technology was not so advanced, people had to depend on letters to communicate with each other and that was a time-consuming method, and it incurred higher cost. In contrast, in today’s world, people just have to be on laptops or smartphones and can have direct communication and interaction with family and friends. They can see each other contrary to the past method of interchanging written words. In this way, people can keep a close relationship with family and friends. We can now make friends beyond borders and that enhances our perspective about other nations and customs. Online groups, social platforms and social networking sites bring people together who have common interests and there are many events those people meet and plan for the betterment of society.        

In fact, the implication of technology on people’s relationships is a controversial issue. On the one hand, it is a positive development for helping people stay connected with family and friends and making new friends. On the other hand, it can estrange the relationships people make. The argument that it has a negative influence on people’s relationships is based on the scenario that people will avoid face-to-face communication in the long run. Recent research indicates that virtual communication will weaken the communication skill of a person. I still remember a film that I watched had a scene that showed four friends having meals in a restaurant. When they sat together, they did not interact with each other face-to-face but through social applications by sending out the emotions in the social group to show their feelings. This example shows a worrying trend as people enjoy interacting virtually more than face to face due to their reliance on technology. It is important to create awareness to the public that actual communication is more important than virtual interaction to minimise its repercussion.

Overall, as far as I am concerned, the advancement of technology has both positive and negative effects on the kind of relationships people make. We have to be aware that actual interaction is more important to enhance a relationship. We shall connect with family and friends virtually only if we are apart from them.

Sample 23:

Face-to-face communication and enough time to get to know each other well are prerequisites for a real relationship. People all like to feel wanted, even if it’s a false sense, despite what other people may believe. The perception that one can be whoever one wants to be online has been shaped by the digital age. But I think that relationships people form virtually and the way people get to know each other online have changed, mostly negatively.

Most are becoming more inward-focused and have forgotten what it means to be a true friend to those around them, rather than being genuine friends. People are emotional creatures who occasionally feel sad and aren’t always happy, but the Internet only shares positive experiences, preventing people from knowing each other completely. Nowadays, people tend to form fast and transient friendships. In real life friendships, individuals support one another through each other’s highs and lows. This is not at all like friendship on social media. Because the Internet cannot take the place of in-person interactions and shared experiences, getting to know someone requires spending time together.

It is only fitting that life be experienced fully, forming bonds with the physical presence of others. Rather than truly being friends with those in their immediate vicinity, they are utilizing social media to establish connections. I consider this to be a drawback of the digital age.

In conclusion, the digital age may have brought about benefits like reaching out to old friends and forming new ones, but it has also had unfavorable effects on our moral, social, and personal lives due to our growing reliance on technology and the ways we pretend to keep up our online friendships.

Sample 24:

Since communication with others comprises a very essential aspect of our daily life, any alteration in the way we communicate with each other will have a profound effect on our social and professional life. This essay will first discuss how technology has influenced the way we relate with each other presently and will then address the question of whether this influence has been positive or negative.

There are several ways in which the new communication technology has influenced people’s way of interaction with each other. Firstly, social media applications have revolutionized the way we communicate. The reason why many people believe this is that nowadays, you can connect with your family and friends instantly through many social media applications such as the Facebook and twitter applications. It is also possible to say that people are now more encouraged to share their opinions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.

However, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions and prefer carrying out their communication behind closed doors. This is causing more people, especially youths, to lose out on many aspects of personal communication. A particularly good example here is a study conducted in the USA showing that more than 75% of high school students are spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet.

To sum up, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.

Sample 25:

In this contemporary era, the means of communication have updated dramatically with the evolution of cutting-edge technologies. In my perspective, I foster that it is a constructive movement, and this treatise will elucidate my stance in the forthcoming paragraphs with credible illustrations.

To start with, the recent improvements in various aspects of technology have revolutionized the entire world such that the public claim that it makes them establish their communication among their peers in a feasible manner. There are many applications which can be downloaded and installed on our electronic gadgets, such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which enable people to exchange messages, photos and videos. The latest breakthrough, instant calling and face-time features for long periods of time with minimal charges incurred, have made humans have a face-to-face interaction virtually. Many organizations are working tirelessly to achieve these updates frequently and are intuitive. For instance, old people who reside in the suburbs are overwhelmed with amusement since they are frequently having a chat with their children who live either in metro cities or in foreign lands. Thus, it creates a remarkable bonding among families who are far away from one another in distant locations.

In a similar fashion, there are multiple websites on the internet which attract youngsters in modern society. They are fascinated by browsing these sites to find new individuals in nearby areas and are meeting up for casual dates to understand each other. Additionally, some are using these to search for pristine friends and are gradually chatting almost every day. This eventually encourages them to identify partners or peers who have similar interests. By sharing their emotions, they feel relaxed and rejuvenated rather than having trepidation or stress. Hence, it plays a significant role in commencing new bonds for the youth.

Taking everything into consideration, the latest innovations in technology have drastically impacted the entire human population to have noteworthy coordination with parents and grandparents and explore new friends. This essay has exposed a plethora of merits and the advantageous impact of technology on the public worldwide.

Sample 26:

In recent years, with the development of information technology and the evolution of the internet, people interact and communicate better and more effectively than in the past. With new technology, people interact via devices where the technology has been converged. Now it is possible to make calls, watch TV, play video games, listen to music and access internet with only one device. Many people believe that technology may improve the type of the relationships people make whereas others do feel that it has negative effects.

It is believed by some people that technology has a positive effect in the way people interact because it is more convenient on daily basis, and the use of new channels to communicate is often free. For example, if you are looking for a job. You do not have to go to the office nor pay stamps to send your CV. You can do this by email by simply clicking on the “submit” button. It is effective because it saves time, and it is simple to apply. Another significant example is the use of social media platforms. It enables people to share experiences and send information instantaneously which can be seen by everyone, so it improves the way people socialise. Moreover, new channels of communication can help maintain good relationships in business between jobseekers and employers as well as with family and friends on a daily basis.

It is argued by others that technology has a negative impact on the type of relationship people make because it can lead to a development of antisocial behaviours. For instance, teenagers who play video games can find themselves in total confusion between the real world and the virtual world. The law is different because in the real world people have to follow rules whereas in the virtual world there are no constraints. It influences the behaviour of people in a negative way. Moreover, it can create a certain form of addiction for some, leading them to become completely isolated and unaware of what is good and right. Also, the use of the internet can spread bad behaviours such as bullying or the promotion of negative images, comments which will have an impact in people’s lives. For example, on Facebook, several teenagers committed suicide after being bullied by their friends. So, the inappropriate use of technology can lead to healthy issues such as addiction or fatal death.

To sum up, the development of technology has changed the type of relationships people make in both a positive and negative fashion. People use new channels in their daily life because it is convenient as well as cheap. However, the use of the internet needs to be carefully monitored and used appropriately to prevent children and vulnerable people from developing addictions, which could lead to harmful or even fatal consequences.

Sample 27:

Today, more than ever, in regard to determining whether or not advances in technology influence the sorts of relationships people make, various views have been set forward. The expansion of modern means of communicating is the continuing debate that causes so much controversy. This matter is evidenced by some experts who believe that they pose a direct threat to social lives and might come at the expense of severe social isolation and a sedentary lifestyle. Others understand the significance of communication and adhere to the concept that these types of relationships are integral pieces of social communication. Consequently, they are regarded as rewarding. Nevertheless, the opinion set forth by the second category is more logical. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my attitudes on this matter.

To begin with, previously, communication among people looked bleak. People used to fulfill and make an appointment to observe each other, and according to the simple fact that communities had busy folks, and they seem doomed to possess far-reaching communication.

In the next place, modern means of communicating control people’s attention. They are the fastest and easiest way of togetherness. Individuals are at the mercy of the digital world to get in touch with others in the remotest part of the world, leading to saving their own time and hanging out every second. This issue questions the requirement to have face to face connections.

In this hectic way of life, the truth is that the responsibility of real-time discussions, visualization of each other, information exchange which enables a person to share a variety of information like activities, events, interests, thoughts fall upon these ways of communication. Thanks to tremendous advances in technology.

In summary, all in all, rather than devoting a fantastic deal of time and energy solely concerning face to face interaction, the trend today is toward utilizing modern means of communication to get in touch with other individuals. The pivotal role in these ways of communicating performed in interpersonal communication is hard to dismiss. However, many men and women do not appreciate it.

Sample 28:

In recent years, the innovation of techonology has led to various changes in the way people interact. As a result, this causes some specific effects on people’s relationships which are generally considered as beneficial impacts on the society.

Conspicuously, the improvement in techonological devices such as computers with internet connection and mobile phones affect people’s relations in different aspects. Firstly, it helps to diversify kinds of relationships instead of just several traditional ones in the past. Besides people’s interactions in real life, many connections are beign bult through a virtual life on the internet especially via facebook or online games. Secondly, the convenience of communicating between people is likely to make people’s relationships more sociable and hardly understandable. In fact, many friendships are not based on trust or sincerity but benefits which are generally hard to be perceived in a virtual life.

Although the development of technology somehow makes people’s relationships more complicated, I still believe that people are actually beneficial from this. Thanks to internet availability, gaps between people are shortened in magical ways. For example, no matter how far the distance between two people, they still can talk directly to each other provided with the internet access. What’s more, people have never been able to save as much time and communicating expenses as at the present. Instead of waiting for months to receive a response from a posted letter, it just takes some seconds for the letter to be delivered through email even to many partners at the same time.

In conclusion, taking advantage of technological development to facilitate interaction between people is beneficial not only for building a good relationship but also for doing business. 

Sample 29:

Technology is expanding in every field, and connectivity will be no exception. Nonetheless, due to its other pitfalls that cause discussion on its positive and negative effects, this enormous shift in the ways of interaction cannot be regarded as fruitful straight away.

One of the essential advantages of focusing on in terms of positive development is that technology makes connectivity simpler and more convenient. Because of recent events such as Skype, video conferencing, Whatsapp, and social networking sites, such as Facebook, people are hardly a click away from the nears and dears. To a great extent, these advances have made us social. Second, there are enormous opportunities for letters and telephone calls to be sent and for requests to be made. Customers used to be on the S.T.D and I.S.D booth in long queues, but now mobile phones and sophisticated gizmos make it easier for everyone to communicate openly.

On the other hand, certain disadvantages cannot be overlooked as people of today not only spend a long time using computers but also do not want to meet their relatives and friends face-to-face, leading to a fading relationship. One of my school friends, for example, visited me personally on various occasions, such as at festivals and birthdays. Still, nowadays, she sends messages to welcome me and sends salutations to my post. Even most members of the family suffer from asphyxia, which is an unusual illness that flares. For imitating relationships, this is a troubling question.

To recap, despite numerous disadvantages, nobody can afford to tackle this ever-fast digital technology that has to make our lives easier.

Sample 30:

Technological advancements have revolutionized how millions of people interact with each other, and it has gone to a whole new level. With it, how we make relationships has also been affected. The essay will expound on how individuals can now build relationships across the world, and then opine that this is an incredibly positive development.

Unprecedented in human history, modern technology has made it extremely convenient for people to communicate and get in touch with family, relatives, friends or old classmates. Besides, people can communicate instantaneously with someone they have never been acquainted with before and in geography, they have never been to with the help of digital applications like WhatsApp or Viber. They can even find someone on a freelancing platform to have their job done. This is quite different from the conventional relationships we develop by meeting in person; it is, nevertheless, hard to downplay these relationships. Moreover, social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn, provide people with a platform that allows them to live chat and comment on someone else’s matter instantly. Strangely enough, some of them even find their dates online and make friends in a distant country without ever meeting them.

Overall, the phenomenon is a real boon to mankind. The revolution in communication that modern technology brings forth has eroded the traditional notions of national sovereignty. It has blurred the line between national and international boundaries and wielded enormous influence on the values of the national identity so as to transform global citizens; whose ideas, values, ethics, and orientations are no longer moulded by the local culture and environment. Rather global ideals and values are incessantly aired on the web and social media to make a better world. Most importantly, the communication revolution paved the way for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, towards which the globe is rapidly heading.

In conclusion, leading-edge technology has altered our mode of interaction forever, transcending national and cultural barriers so that individuals can frankly chat, talk and can readily keep in touch, and it is a windfall achievement that will transform a new world where things, like culture, sect, and so on, that split people will not exist.

Sample 31:

Technology has revolutionised the way people interact with each other in recent times. However, this has led to a decline in the quality of relationships people make. The impact of technology on relationships is a double-edged sword, and while some may argue that it has been a positive development, I believe that it has had negative effects.

One of the ways that technology has affected relationships is that people are becoming more isolated and less likely to engage in face-to-face interactions. The rise of social media platforms and instant messaging services have made it easier for people to communicate remotely, but it has also led to a decrease in the frequency and quality of in-person interactions. People are now more likely to spend their time on social media rather than meeting up with friends or family members. Moreover, technology has made it easier for people to be dishonest and insincere in their interactions. For instance, people can now hide behind the anonymity of the internet and present a false version of themselves. This has led to a decline in trust and authenticity in relationships.

Another way that technology has affected relationships is that people are now more reliant on their devices than on their relationships. People can now find entertainment and fulfil their social needs through technology, making it less necessary to build and maintain meaningful relationships.

In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly had many positive effects on society, its impact on relationships has been mostly negative. It has led to a decrease in in-person interactions, a decline in genuineness and trust, and an increased reliance on devices over relationships. It is crucial that people recognize these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them by prioritising in-person interactions and being more sincere and honest in their relationships.